The present invention relates to computer security in general, and, more particularly, to authentication based on geo-location history.
In many instances it is desirable for security reasons to require that a user be authenticated before he or she is allowed to access a resource (e.g., file, application, etc.) of a data-processing system (e.g., a desktop personal computer, a server, a personal digital assistant [PDA], a smartphone, etc). Typically a user is presented with an authentication challenge, and the user must supply a valid response to the challenge. A ubiquitous challenge/response mechanism, colloquially referred to as “logging in,” is to prompt a user for his or her username and password. A disadvantage of this technique, however, is that users often select passwords that can be easily guessed. In addition, passwords can be stolen by spyware or other “malware” that is installed surreptitiously on a user's computer.
Another popular challenge/response mechanism—which is often used as a backup in case a user forgets his or her password—is a secret question (e.g., “What is your mother's maiden name?”, “What was your first telephone number?”, etc.) to which the user provides an answer, a priori. Subsequently, at authentication time, the user is presented with the secret question and must respond with the previously-supplied answer. The efficacy and security of this mechanism relies on using a secret question whose answer is easily remembered by the user, but is unlikely to be known by an imposter. This technique, unfortunately, also suffers from a number of disadvantages: first, the answer to a secret question is typically much easier to guess than a good password; second, it is possible that the information requested is publicly obtainable; and third, security administrators all seem to use the same “classic” secret questions, so that a question compromised on one system likely compromises other systems as well.
Therefore, what is needed is a secure authentication technique that overcomes some of the disadvantages of the prior art.
The present invention is a secure method of authenticating users without some of the disadvantages of the prior art. In particular, the illustrative embodiments maintain a geo-location history of a wireless device (e.g., a Global Positioning System [GPS]-enabled wireless telecommunications terminal, a smart card, a radio frequency identification [RFID] tag, etc.), and the user is authenticated by asking one or more questions based on the geo-location history, such as:
In the first illustrative embodiment, a user of a geo-location-enabled wireless telecommunications terminal (e.g., a GPS-enabled cell phone, a GPS-enabled notebook computer, etc.) who attempts to access a restricted resource is challenged with one or more questions that are generated from the terminal's geo-location history. In the second illustrative embodiment, a user of a data-processing system who attempts to access a restricted resource is asked to provide a username Z. The user is then challenged with one or more questions that are generated from the geo-location history of a wireless device that is associated with username Z (e.g., a cell phone that belongs to the user whose username is Z, an on-board navigation system of a car that belongs to the user whose username is Z, etc.).
The illustrative embodiment comprises: receiving a response to an authentication challenge, wherein the response is provided by a user, and wherein the authentication challenge comprises a question about the user's geo-location history; and determining whether the user is successfully authenticated based on how consistent the response is with the geo-location history of a wireless device.
Telecommunications network 105 is a network that comprises one or more wireless elements (e.g., wireless access points, wireless base stations, etc.) and is capable of transporting signals to and from wireless telecommunications terminals, such as terminal 110, and data-processing systems, such as server 120 and geo-location server 130. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure, although in the illustrative embodiments telecommunications network 105 is depicted as a single network, in some other embodiments of the present invention telecommunications network 105 might actually comprise two or more networks.
Geo-location-enabled wireless telecommunications terminal 110 is a device that is capable of:
As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, there are a variety of well-known methods for estimating geo-location based on received electromagnetic signals (e.g., via a Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver, via triangulation, via RF fingerprinting, etc.), and it will be clear to those skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure, how to make and use embodiments of the present invention for terminals that use these methods—as well as embodiments in which the estimation of terminal 110's geo-location is performed by an entity other than wireless telecommunications terminal 110. As will further be appreciated by those skilled in the art, hands-free wireless telecommunications terminal 110 might communicate via one or more protocols (e.g., Code Division Multiple Access [CDMA], Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers [IEEE] 802.11, Bluetooth, etc.), and it will be clear to those skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure, how to make and use embodiments of the present invention based on these protocols.
Server 120 is a data-processing system that is capable of receiving and transmitting signals via telecommunications network 105, of hosting one or more resources (e.g., files, applications, etc.) that require a user to be authenticated before access is granted, and of performing the tasks described below and with respect to
For easier digestion, a description of geo-location server 130 is deferred until after that of geo-location history database 140 and
Geo-location history database 140 is a database that is capable of storing and organizing data in a manner that enables efficient access and queries. For illustrative purposes, geo-location database 140 is a relational database; however, it will be clear to those skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure, how to make use other embodiments of the present invention in which geo-location database 140 is some other kind of database (e.g., an object-oriented database, a hierarchical database, etc.).
As shown in
As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, in some embodiments of the present invention the schema of table 203 might be augmented with additional information—for example, minimum speed—which might indicate whether there was a traffic jam during a user's commute on a highway and enable challenge questions such as “Were you in a traffic jam yesterday?”, “Did you see an accident?”, and so forth.
Now returning to
As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, there are a variety of ways in which the aforementioned thread of geo-location server 130 can carry out task (iii). For example, the event represented by the first row of table 203 in
At task 610, wireless telecommunications terminal 110 receives an authentication challenge from server 120, in response to either (i) the user of terminal 110 attempting to access a restricted resource of server 120, or (ii) an authentication request sent to server 120 by terminal 110 after the user of terminal 110 attempts to access a restricted resource of terminal 110.
At task 620, wireless telecommunications terminal 110 presents the authentication challenge to its user (e.g., via its video display, speaker, etc.), in well-known fashion.
At task 630, wireless telecommunications terminal 110 receives its user's response, in well-known fashion.
At task 640, wireless telecommunications terminal 110 transmits the response to server 120, in well-known fashion.
At task 710, server 120 receives a signal S from a wireless telecommunications terminal, in well-known fashion. (In order to simplify the description of the remaining tasks of
At task 720, server 120 checks whether signal S requires that the user of wireless terminal 110 has been authenticated. If so, execution proceeds to task 730, otherwise execution continues at task 750. (As described above, in some embodiments only a subset of signals received from terminal 110 might require the user to be authenticated, while in some other embodiments authentication might be required for any signal received from terminal 110.)
At task 730, server 120 checks whether the user of wireless terminal 110 has been successfully authenticated. If so, execution continues at task 750, otherwise execution proceeds to task 740.
At task 740, server 120 authenticates the user, as described below and with respect to
At task 750, server 120 branches to either task 760 or task 770, depending on whether or not the authentication at task 740 was successful.
At task 760, server 120 processes signal S in accordance with how it is programmed, in well-known fashion. After task 760, execution continues back at task 710.
At task 770, server 120 transmits a message to wireless telecommunications terminal 110 indicating that authentication failed. After task 770, execution continues back at task 710.
Although the method of
At subtask 810, server 120 sets an authentication status flag for terminal 110's user to unsuccessful.
At subtask 820, server 120 generates an authentication challenge based on terminal 110's geo-location history. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, there are a variety of methods that could be used to generate questions from geo-location history database 140. For example, a challenge might be generated by selecting one of the events for terminal 110 from table 203, describing the event using a portion of the information for that event (preferably using meaningful descriptions such as the locale name rather than the locale identifier), and prompting the user to supply one or more missing data about the event. As will further be appreciated by those skilled in the art, challenges that incorporate more complex concepts, such as “When was the last time you were at Yankee Stadium?”, might be generated by instantiating “prepared statement” queries that have been composed a priori.
At subtask 830, server 120 transmits the authentication challenge to telecommunications terminal 110, in well-known fashion.
At subtask 840, server 120 receives a response to the authentication challenge from telecommunications terminal 110, in well-known fashion.
At subtask 850, server 120 determines whether the response is sufficiently consistent with terminal 110's geo-location history (e.g., how close a particular time specified by the user is to a time obtained from the geo-location history, etc.) As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the particular bounds or other criteria that are employed in this determination is largely a policy issue to be decided by an administrator, programmer, etc., and it will be clear to those of ordinary skill in the art, after reading this disclosure, how to implement this determination in accordance with such policies.
If the response is determined to be sufficiently consistent with terminal 110's geo-location history at subtask 850, execution proceeds to subtask 860, otherwise execution continues at subtask 870.
At subtask 860, server 120 sets the authentication status flag for terminal 110's user to successful.
At subtask 870, server 120 transmits the value of the authentication status flag to wireless telecommunications terminal 110, in well-known fashion. After subtask 870, execution continues at task 750 of
As shown in
Geo-location-enabled wireless device 901 is capable of:
Server 920 is a data-processing system that is capable of receiving and transmitting signals via telecommunications network 105, of hosting one or more resources (e.g., files, applications, etc.) that require a user to be authenticated before access is granted, and of authenticating a user as in the first illustrative embodiment, with the following exceptions:
As shown in
Although the second illustrative embodiment is disclosed in the context of restricting access to a data-processing system (902), it will be clear to those skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure, how to make and use embodiments of the present invention for restricting access to other types of systems (e.g., automobiles, safes, home-security systems, etc.) that are not typically thought of as “data-processing systems.”
Furthermore, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure, that some embodiments of the present invention might incorporate additional geo-location-based data, such as traffic data and news reports, and it will be clear to those skilled in the art, after reading this disclosure, how to make and use embodiments that incorporate such data and that generate authentication challenges based, at least in part, on such data.
It is to be understood that the above-described embodiments are merely illustrative of the present invention and that many variations of the above-described embodiments can be devised by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the invention. For example, in this Specification, numerous specific details are provided in order to provide a thorough description and understanding of the illustrative embodiments of the present invention. Those skilled in the art will recognize, however, that the invention can be practiced without one or more of those details, or with other methods, materials, components, etc.
Furthermore, in some instances, well-known structures, materials, or operations are not shown or described in detail to avoid obscuring aspects of the illustrative embodiments. It is understood that the various embodiments shown in the Figures are illustrative, and are not necessarily drawn to scale. Reference throughout the specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” or “some embodiments” means that a particular feature, structure, material, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment(s) is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention, but not necessarily all embodiments. Consequently, the appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment,” “in an embodiment,” or “in some embodiments” in various places throughout the Specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, materials, or characteristics can be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. It is therefore intended that such variations be included within the scope of the following claims and their equivalents.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent Ser. No. 11/611,720, filed Dec. 15, 2006, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5757916 | MacDoran et al. | May 1998 | A |
7099676 | Law et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7242950 | Suryanarayana | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7397365 | Wang | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7542931 | Black | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7974602 | Agrawal | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8424061 | Rosenoer | Apr 2013 | B2 |
20020068580 | Bala et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020076015 | Norwitz et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030022673 | Bantz | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030236614 | Yamakita et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20050128304 | Manasseh | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060020816 | Campbell | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070053306 | Stevens | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070118520 | Bliss | May 2007 | A1 |
20070197197 | Minear | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208503 | Harnsberger | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070234408 | Burch et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080033877 | Blair | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080070550 | Hose | Mar 2008 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Seerna Sharma, Location Based Authentication, May 20, 2005, University of New Orleans ScholarWorks@UNO. pp. 1-58. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150230086 A1 | Aug 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11611720 | Dec 2006 | US |
Child | 14690840 | US |