All of the material in this patent document is subject to copyright protection under the copyright laws of the United States and of other countries. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
1. Field of the Present Invention
The present invention relates generally to the installation of stringlines for guiding construction equipment, and, in particular, to the automated installation of stringlines, for guiding slip form paving machines, using 3D control data.
2. Background
In the construction industry, a longstanding issue has been how to accurately determine, on the construction site, the desired location for a building, road or other construction project as specified in plans developed by an architect, engineer, or the like. Most commonly, surveying techniques, supplemented in recent decades by advances in surveying technology, have been used to pinpoint and mark precise locations on a construction site, thereby guiding construction workers as they work.
Unfortunately, during construction, the locations marked by the surveyors may be affected by the construction process itself. For example, stakes that are laid out by surveyors to mark the edges of a planned road may be moved, covered or destroyed by earth-moving equipment as excavation, fill or the like is carried out. As a result, construction must often be halted temporarily while surveyors reestablish the construction locations, and then the earth-moving process is continued.
More recently, advances in global positioning system (“GPS”) technology have begun to find applicability in the construction industry. Perhaps most obviously, GPS technology is now widely used by surveyors in finding locations because it permits actual physical locations to be determined with accuracy to the hundredth of a foot. Because the plans for most construction projects today are developed via computer, such techniques are particularly useful because the plans can be coordinated with the GPS data, thereby providing precise guidance during the surveying process.
In addition, however, GPS has begun to be used to guide the operation of construction equipment during the construction process itself. In fact, the use of so-called three-dimensional (“3D”) controls to direct the operation of construction equipment is becoming increasingly common, particularly with regard to earthmoving equipment. A typical implementation of a 3D control system in such a context involves the use of one or more fixed base stations, located in and around the construction site, coupled with a mobile unit disposed on the individual construction equipment that is to be controlled via the system. As described below, the type of control system used may vary, but in each case, the exact position of each base station may be established by conventional surveying means, supplemented by the use of GPS technology.
In one type of 3D control system, the mobile unit is also a GPS unit, and thus the position of the mobile unit, and indirectly, the construction equipment on which it is carried, may be determined with some accuracy using only the mobile unit. The position information provided by the mobile GPS unit by itself is of only limited accuracy. However, in this arrangement, the GPS data developed by the mobile unit may be supplemented and adjusted, as appropriate, using additional GPS data from the fixed base stations, the position of each of which is known with great accuracy. This, in turn, provides highly accurate information about the exact position of the mobile unit, and indirectly, the construction equipment. Such a system is sometimes referred to as a real time kinematic (“RTK”) GPS system.
More commonly, however, the base station is a robotic laser-based tracking station, sometimes called a “total station,” and the mobile unit includes a prism, wherein the robotic tracking station produces one or more lasers and directs them toward the construction equipment, and more particularly, toward the prism, which is mounted in a prominent location on the construction equipment to maximize its ability to receive the laser. In this type of 3D control system, the laser is used to determine the position of the prism relative to the base station by calculating distance and angle. Because the position of the base station is known, the position of the prism, and indirectly the position of the construction equipment, may be established using the combination of the GPS information developed by the base station and the relative positional information provided using the laser and prism.
For a variety of reasons, however, it is very difficult to use these systems to control equipment such as slip form paving machinery, an example of which is shown in
Unfortunately, this approach includes a number of inherent inaccuracies, particularly for curbing machines and other slip form paving machines. First, this approach is dependent upon sufficient movement by the machine in a straightforward direction. The approach cannot work at all if the machine is not moving, because direction of travel cannot be determined in this way if the current location and the previous location are the same. Further, the approach may be highly inaccurate if the current location and the previous location are particularly close to each other, which may happen if the machine is operating in a confined area or is of a type that can spin in place or turn with a very tight turning radius.
Another inaccuracy stems from the fact that machine orientation is not exactly equivalent to direction of travel. For example, it is impossible to determine precisely whether the path traveled by the machine from its previous location to its current location followed a straight line or a curved one. Because the orientation of the machine at the current location will be different if the machine followed a straight line to get there than if it followed a curved one, this uncertainty translates to corresponding uncertainty in the orientation of the machine.
Yet another inaccuracy stems from the use of positional data for only a single point (the point at which the mobile unit is positioned on the machine) to represent the position of the entire machine. In fact, most machines are several meters wide, several meters long and at least a couple of meters high. Because GPS (coupled with one of the systems described above) may be used to determine location to accuracies of considerably less than a meter, the positional data thus determined is accurate only for a small part of the machine, i.e., the exact location of the mobile unit on the machine. The position or location of other parts of the machine, such as the machine's operational components, may be determined only by combining information about the relative disposition of the mobile unit on the machine with knowledge of the geometry of the machine. For machines whose typical use involves travel only in a linear direction, and deviations from such travel occur only infrequently, this approximation may be acceptable. However, for other types of machines that turn regularly, or whose operational components move or are adjusted dramatically relative to the rest of the machine, the error induced between the fixed position of the mobile unit and the position or orientation of the operational components can become dramatic, thus rendering the use of such a system unsuitable for controlling certain types of machines.
The significance of this problem increases in relation to the degree of independence with which the operational components of the machine move relative to the movement of the machine itself. For example, in a curbing machine, the slip forming equipment mounted on the machine is typically adapted to form curbs having very short radiuses of curvature while the machine itself moves forward or stops altogether. When this type of curb is being formed, the movement of the operational components is thus very different from the movement of the machine itself. Conventional systems are ill-equipped to address this issue.
Paving and curbing equipment further require the attitude of the machine side-to-side (generally referred to as “cross slope”) and the attitude of the machine front-to-back (generally referred to as “long slope”) to be accurately controlled in order to maintain the proper three-dimensional form (side-to-side and front-to-back) of the pavement or curbing being formed. Traditionally, the machine location, direction, and long slope is referenced from a stringline that is placed ahead of time to guide the location of the slip-forming equipment on the machine, while cross slope is monitored by a cross slope sensor. If a 3D control system of one of the types described hereinabove is applied to such equipment, the only information continuously established with regard to the machine is the location of the single mobile unit (most often, a prism); all other information must be extrapolated, with varying degrees of accuracy, or must be developed using other means. For example, the determination of long slope requires an additional sensor over and above the cross slope sensor. Such a sensor is not usually provided on stringline-controlled machines, and thus represents an additional complication in the application of conventional 3D control systems to, for example, paving and curbing machines.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, advances have been made recently in this technology area, including early development of an automated paving machine, as described in co-pending and commonly-assigned U.S. Patent Application No. 60/910,251 (“the '251 patent application”), the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference, that utilizes a 3D control system for a paving machine. Such advances may address some of the aforementioned problems, but no commercial product has yet to be provided. Moreover, such a 3D control system may be difficult to use while maintaining a high level of accuracy. Furthermore, it might be cost-prohibitive to equip all construction machines on a job site with 3D control systems. For these reasons and others, it may continue to be useful to install and use stringlines for guidance of conventional paving machines, and it would be foolish to ignore the traditional importance of the stringline in establishing, indirectly, the location of other features as well. Conventionally, the stringline is one of the first construction elements put in place on a construction site. Other construction elements are either placed based directly on the stringline or are placed based on the paving structure that is built by the paving machine.
Nonetheless, the benefits of GPS and laser-based 3D systems are apparent. Thus, until accurate 3D control systems for stringline-guided paving machines are widely and economically available, a need exists for a system that utilizes at least some of the benefits of GPS and laser-based 3D systems for aid in pointing to and/or ultimately controlling the placement of physical references such as stakes or stringlines.
Broadly defined, the present invention according to one aspect includes an automated stringline installation system comprising a vehicle; a 3D control system, at least partly carried by the vehicle, for determining location information; and an adjustable arm assembly, mounted on the vehicle, that identifies the location of a relative point in a stringline installation using the location information determined by the 3D control system.
In a feature of this aspect, the relative point is a particular point, on the ground, where a stake is to be installed in a stringline installation. With regard to this feature, the adjustable arm assembly is adapted to install the stake at the particular point. In an additional feature, the relative point is a particular point, elevated over the ground, through which a string is to be installed in a stringline installation. With regard to this feature, the adjustable arm assembly is adapted to position the string such that it is routed through the particular point, and the adjustable arm assembly is adapted to install the string such that is routed through the particular point.
In another feature of this aspect, the automated stringline installation system further comprises a reel assembly for carrying a spool of string such that the string may be routed from the reel assembly to the particular point. In an additional feature, the relative point is a particular point, in an existing stringline installation, whose actual location is to be determined. With regard to this feature, the automated stringline installation system further comprises a database in which the actual location of the particular point is recorded as installed data.
In yet another feature, the adjustable arm assembly includes an operational arm and a translational platform. In accordance with this feature, the translational platform includes a mechanical assembly that permits the operational arm to be displaced, relative to the vehicle, in one or more degree of freedom. With regard to this feature, the operational arm shifts, along at least one axis, relative to the vehicle. With further regard to this feature, the operational arm rotates, around at least one axis, relative to the vehicle. In furtherance of this feature, the mechanical assembly includes a plurality of adjustment mechanisms, each permitting the operational arm to be displaced in exactly one degree of freedom.
In additional features, the adjustable arm assembly includes an articulated arm and the automated stringline installation system further comprises an arm-mounted locator assembly disposed at a distal end of the adjustable arm assembly and arranged to point to the relative point. In another feature, the automated stringline installation system further comprises a sensor used to determine information pertaining to the location of a distal end of the adjustable arm assembly relative to the 3D control system. With regard to this feature, the sensor determines a state or position of an adjustment mechanism in the adjustable arm assembly; the sensor determines a distance or angle of a first portion of the adjustable arm assembly relative to a second portion of the adjustable arm assembly; and the sensor determines a distance or angle between the distal end of the adjustable arm assembly and the 3D control system directly.
In another feature, the 3D control system includes a fixed base station locatable in the general vicinity of the vehicle on a construction site, and a mobile unit carried by the vehicle. In accordance with this feature, the fixed base station is equipped with GPS and the mobile unit includes a GPS unit, and the base station is a robotic laser-based tracking station and the mobile unit includes a prism.
The present invention according to a second aspect includes an automated stringline installation system comprising an operational arm having a proximal end and a distal end; a string, dispensed from the operational arm, for use in a stringline installation; and a sensor used to determine information pertaining to the location of the distal end of the operational arm assembly relative to the proximal end of the operational arm.
In a feature of this aspect, the automated stringline installation system further comprises a machine controller that determines the location of the distal end of the operational arm assembly relative to the proximal end of the operational arm using the information determined by the sensor. In another feature of this aspect, the automated stringline installation system further comprises a geodetic device carried adjacent the proximal end of the operational arm, wherein the machine controller further determines the location of the distal end of the operational arm assembly relative to the geodetic device using the information determined by the sensor. In accordance with this feature, the geodetic device includes a GPS unit and the geodetic device includes a prism.
In an additional feature of this aspect, the sensor determines a state or position of an adjustment mechanism in the operational arm. With regard to this feature, the sensor determines a distance or angle of a first portion of the operational arm relative to a second portion of the adjustable arm assembly, the sensor determines a distance or angle between the distal end of the operational arm and the proximal end of the operational arm directly, and the sensor determines a distance or angle between the distal end of the operational arm and the geodetic device directly.
In yet another feature, the automated stringline installation system further comprises a translational platform supporting the operational arm. With regard to this feature, the translational platform includes a mechanical assembly that permits the operational arm to be displaced in one or more degree of freedom. In accordance with this feature, the operational arm shifts along at least one axis and the operational arm rotates around at least one axis. It is preferred that the mechanical assembly includes a plurality of adjustment mechanisms, each permitting the operational arm to be displaced in exactly one degree of freedom.
In a further feature, the operational arm includes an articulated arm. In a still further feature, the distal end of the operational arm is adapted to identify the location of a relative point in a stringline installation using the location information determined by the sensor. With regard to this feature, the relative point is a particular point, on the ground, where a stake is to be installed in a stringline installation. In accordance with this feature, the operational arm is adapted to install the stake at the particular point. In furtherance of this feature, the relative point is a particular point, elevated over the ground, through which the string is to be installed in a stringline installation. With respect to this feature, the operational arm is adapted to position the string such that it is routed through the particular point and the operational arm is adapted to install the string such that is routed through the particular point. It is preferred that the automated stringline installation system further comprise a reel assembly for carrying a spool of the string such that the string may be routed from the reel assembly to the particular point.
In another feature, the relative point is a particular point, in an existing stringline installation, whose actual location is to be determined. With regard to this feature, the automated stringline installation system further comprises a database in which the actual location of the particular point is recorded as installed data. In an additional feature, the automated stringline installation system further comprises an arm-mounted locator assembly disposed at the distal end of the operational arm and arranged to point to the relative point.
In a yet another feature, the automated stringline installation system further comprises a reel assembly for carrying a spool of the string such that the string may be routed from the reel assembly to the distal end of the operational arm. In accordance with this feature, the automated stringline installation system further comprises a string tensioning device. With regard to this feature, the string tensioning device is disposed at the distal end of the operational arm.
The present invention according to a third aspect includes a method of installing a stringline for guiding construction equipment comprising providing a vehicle having machine controller, including a memory, and an adjustable arm assembly mounted thereon, the adjustable arm assembly having a proximal end and a distal end; storing data representative of a desired location for a stake in the memory, the stake being a stake in a stringline installation; driving the vehicle in the immediate vicinity of the desired stake location; automatically determining an actual location indicated by the distal end of the adjustable arm assembly; comparing the actual location of the distal end of the adjustable arm assembly to the desired stake location stored in the memory; and installing a stringline stake in the actual location indicated by the distal end of the adjustable arm assembly according to the outcome of the comparing step.
Further areas of applicability of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description provided hereinafter. It should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating the preferred embodiment of the invention, are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
Further features, embodiments, and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description with reference to the drawings, wherein:
As a preliminary matter, it will readily be understood by one having ordinary skill in the relevant art (“Ordinary Artisan”) that the present invention has broad utility and application. Furthermore, any embodiment discussed and identified as being “preferred” is considered to be part of a best mode contemplated for carrying out the present invention. Other embodiments also may be discussed for additional illustrative purposes in providing a full and enabling disclosure of the present invention. Moreover, many embodiments, such as adaptations, variations, modifications, and equivalent arrangements, will be implicitly disclosed by the embodiments described herein and fall within the scope of the present invention.
Accordingly, while the present invention is described herein in detail in relation to one or more embodiments, it is to be understood that this disclosure is illustrative and exemplary of the present invention, and is made merely for the purposes of providing a full and enabling disclosure of the present invention. The detailed disclosure herein of one or more embodiments is not intended, nor is to be construed, to limit the scope of patent protection afforded the present invention, which scope is to be defined by the claims and the equivalents thereof. It is not intended that the scope of patent protection afforded the present invention be defined by reading into any claim a limitation found herein that does not explicitly appear in the claim itself.
Thus, for example, any sequence(s) and/or temporal order of steps of various processes or methods that are described herein are illustrative and not restrictive. Accordingly, it should be understood that, although steps of various processes or methods may be shown and described as being in a sequence or temporal order, the steps of any such processes or methods are not limited to being carried out in any particular sequence or order, absent an indication otherwise. Indeed, the steps in such processes or methods generally may be carried out in various different sequences and orders while still falling within the scope of the present invention. Accordingly, it is intended that the scope of patent protection afforded the present invention is to be defined by the appended claims rather than the description set forth herein.
Additionally, it is important to note that each term used herein refers to that which the Ordinary Artisan would understand such term to mean based on the contextual use of such term herein. To the extent that the meaning of a term used herein—as understood by the Ordinary Artisan based on the contextual use of such term—differs in any way from any particular dictionary definition of such term, it is intended that the meaning of the term as understood by the Ordinary Artisan should prevail.
Furthermore, it is important to note that, as used herein, “a” and “an” each generally denotes “at least one,” but does not exclude a plurality unless the contextual use dictates otherwise. Thus, reference to “a picnic basket having an apple” describes “a picnic basket having at least one apple” as well as “a picnic basket having apples.” In contrast, reference to “a picnic basket having a single apple” describes “a picnic basket having only one apple.”
When used herein to join a list of items, “or” denotes “at least one of the items,” but does not exclude a plurality of items of the list. Thus, reference to “a picnic basket having cheese or crackers” describes “a picnic basket having cheese without crackers”, “a picnic basket having crackers without cheese”, and “a picnic basket having both cheese and crackers.” Finally, when used herein to join a list of items, “and” denotes “all of the items of the list.” Thus, reference to “a picnic basket having cheese and crackers” describes “a picnic basket having cheese, wherein the picnic basket further has crackers,” as well as describes “a picnic basket having crackers, wherein the picnic basket further has cheese.”
Referring now to the drawings, in which like numerals represent like components throughout the several views, the preferred embodiments of the present invention are next described. The following description of the preferred embodiment(s) is merely exemplary in nature and is in no way intended to limit the invention, its application, or uses.
The 3D control system 20 includes a mobile unit 22, a base station 24, a machine controller 26 and a user interface (not shown). The 3D control system 20 may be either a conventional GPS-only system or a conventional laser-based tracking system, each of which is well known to the Ordinary Artisan but is described in some detail herein. In summary, in a GPS-only system, the base station 24 and mobile unit 22 are each GPS-equipped, and the mobile unit 22 utilizes GPS information from the base station 24 to provide a more accurate determination of location. As noted previously, such a system is sometimes referred to as an RTK GPS system. In a laser-based tracking system, the base station 24 is a robotic laser-based tracking station or total station, and the mobile unit 22 is equipped with a prism. In either case, positional data is relayed to the machine controller 26, which includes a data processor/comparator or the like, converts positional data developed by the mobile unit 22 and base station 24 into control information for navigating the vehicle 30. The mobile unit 22 may be designed to be compatible with conventional GPS base station products in order to reduce the cost of developing the system 20 and to reduce implementation costs for operators of slip form paving machines 12.
Although shown only schematically, the vehicle 30 may be any suitable transportation device capable of carrying the other components while traversing the general course along which the stringline 14 is to be installed. Accordingly, although the vehicle 30 need not follow the stringline course precisely (i.e., the operation of the automated arm assembly 40, described below, provides some tolerance), the vehicle 30 needs to be capable of navigating a path that mimics the course within the tolerance provided by the automated arm assembly 40. Such a course may be calculated automatically by the machine controller 26, or it may determined manually by the operator. In at least one embodiment, preferred for its ease of implementation, the vehicle 30 is a pick-up truck that may or may not be pulling a trailer. In this embodiment, the automated arm assembly 40 may be mounted in the cargo bed of the pick-up, and the user interface may be mounted in the cab of the pick-up for ready access by the driver/operator. The trailer may be particularly suited to carrying stringline stake and rod assemblies 16 for ready supply during the stringline installation process. In at least one other embodiment, the vehicle 30 is a custom-built or custom-modified vehicle having four-wheel steering for more precise navigational ability. The design and implementation of such a vehicle 30 will be within the skill of the Ordinary Artisan.
The user interface includes such elements as are necessary to provide appropriate feedback and control. The user interface may include, for example, at least one display, one or more indicators, and one or more system controls. A 3D display may be included in order to provide the operator with a three-dimensional indication of the location of the vehicle 30, the mobile unit 22, the automated arm assembly 40, or any combination thereof. A video display, linked to a video camera or the like stationed in proximity to the automated arm assembly 40, may be included to provide the operator with one or more images of the actual operation of the arm assembly 40 for verification purposes, manual control, or the like. Indicators may include appropriate audio and/or visual indicators for providing the operator with status information, to indicate the proximity of the vehicle and/or the arm assembly 40 to a desired location 61 in the stringline 14, or the like. For example, an audio indicator might change pitch and intensity as the operator moves closer to a stake location 61, similar to the operation of audio indicators used in metal detectors and satellite antenna pointing equipment, and visual indicators might be configured to provide directional and distance information using LED light bars or a compass style pointing mechanism so the operator can adjust the vehicle's speed and direction when approaching a stake location 61. Finally, system controls may include all those necessary to activate and operate the system 10, to access site plan data, and the like.
The automated arm assembly 40 includes an operational arm 42, a translational platform 44 for adjusting the position and/or orientation of the arm 42, a reel assembly 46 on which is mounted a spool 48 of string 15, and an optional string tensioning device 50. The reel assembly 46 and a proximal end 52 of the arm 42 are mounted on the translational platform 44 such that string 15 from the spool 48 may be unwound and routed through or along the arm 42 to its distal end 54, from whence the stringline 14 may be installed according to the desired stringline design. Although shown only schematically, the operational arm 42 itself may take on any convenient form, but should be rigid enough to permit the precise position of the distal end 54 to be accurately determinable relative to the platform 44 and/or the vehicle 30, and particularly relative to the mobile unit 22 of the 3D control system 20.
Although the route of the string 15 from the reel assembly 46 to the distal end 54 of the operational arm 42, and from there to the stakes 17 of the stringline installation, inherently creates tension in the string 15, this tension is preferably controlled using a conventional tensioning device 50.
The translational platform 44 is a mechanical assembly that permits the operational arm 42 to be displaced (shifted or rotated) in one or more degree of freedom (i.e., shifted along one or more axis, rotated about one or more axis, or the like), or any combination thereof, depending upon its implementation. In the embodiment illustrated in
Although not illustrated, the Ordinary Artisan will understand that still other mechanical structures may be utilized to accomplish similar purposes without departing from the scope of the present invention. For example, some or all of the elements of the automated arm assembly 40 to be replaced with an articulated operational arm whose various operational elements can be cooperatively controlled to maneuver the distal end thereof as desired, and information from sensors corresponding to those described previously may be used to determine the actual position of the distal end by applying the relative positional information derived therefrom to the vehicle's actual position as determined by the 3D control system 20. In at least one aspect of the present invention, the design of the automated arm assembly 40 is not important; the ability to position the distal end of the assembly 40 in a desired location is.
In use, stringline data is derived from conventional 3D design and modeling software systems used by engineering and contracting firms in the road/real estate development industry. Site plan data is output from such systems in a preferably standard file format, and the data for the stringline portion of the design is extracted and the appropriate offset for the stringline position, relative to the project itself, is established. For example, for a curb and gutter project 13, the curb and gutter design is extracted from the database and a Top Back of Curb (“TBOC”) offset for the stringline position is established based upon a curb-and-gutter contractor's field operation requirements. Next, the stake locations 61 necessary to insure proper stringline positioning are determined, either automatically or manually. For example, stake locations 61 around a curve may be determined based on based upon a rule that limits the chord effect of stringline 14 such that a stake 17 would be required every x feet for a radius of y feet.
The stake placements 61 so determined may be reviewed by a curb-and-gutter contractor's data management specialist to insure compliance with any required field operations rules and site specific circumstances. For example, stake placement may also be affected by slope changes and other infrastructure elements or factors on the work site. The resulting stringline 3D data file would then be converted into a machine control format necessary to operate the automated stringline installation system 10 at the construction site, and the resulting control data is loaded into the machine controller 26.
Based upon GPS positioning relative to the stringline design, as established in the 3D data file, an operator drives the vehicle 30 in the area of stringline installation. The operator positions the vehicle 30 within a specified operating area, defined by the operational reach of the automated arm assembly 40, adjacent the next stake placement defined in the stringline data file. Positioning may be accomplished manually, either in accordance with information provided by the machine controller 26 or by dead reckoning, or may be accomplished automatically under the control of the machine controller 26 or a related component. It is contemplated that positioning the vehicle 30 within a radius of three feet around the desired stringline stake position 61 will be sufficient. In maneuvering the vehicle 30 into position, the operator may use the visual and audio indicators provided by the user interface as described previously.
Upon reaching the necessary vehicle position, the operator stops the vehicle 30 and preferably places it into a “locked” position or state. Using the translational platform 44, the position of the distal end 54 of the operational arm 42 may be adjusted until it reaches a desired location, the desired location being established according to any of a variety of predetermined criteria as more fully described below. For example, in one or more embodiments, the desired location of the end of the operational arm 42 is a point relatively close to a desired stake location 61 for the stringline 14 being installed. While maintaining the end of the operational arm 42 in place, the operator determines the precise location 61 on the ground at which the next stake 17 is to be placed. Such determination may be made manually or automatically as further described hereinbelow. The operator or the assistant may then drive a stake 17 into the ground at the identified location 61 using conventional means.
During this process, the operational arm 42 also maintains the position of the string 15. Thus, once the stake 17 is in place, the disposition of the rod 18 may be readily adjusted by manipulating the clamp 19 until the string-holding end of the rod 18 is located at the necessary height, distance from the stake 17, and orientation. Once so arranged, the string 15 may then be easily mounted on the rod 18 using conventional means. When the process is complete, the operator may then remove the vehicle 30 from its “locked” position or state and drive it to the next stake location. The process is then repeated for each stake location 61 in the design.
Precise stringline locations, such as stake locations 61 and string/rod interconnection locations, may be determined in a variety of ways. In the embodiment illustrated in
In operation, the arm-mounted locator assembly 80 can be used to identify specific locations on the ground, such as stake locations 61, or specific points along a string 15, such as the points at which the string 15 is to be attached to respective rods 18. More particularly, the machine controller 26 may adjust the position of the operational arm 42, and if appropriate the arm-mounted locator assembly 80 itself, as necessary such that the first locator arm 82 (and more particularly, the pointer device 86 at the distal end thereof) points downward to the precise location 61 on the ground at which the next stake 17 is to be placed. Similarly, the machine controller 26 may adjust the position of the operational arm 42, and if appropriate the arm-mounted locator assembly 80 itself, as necessary such that the second locator arm 84 (and more particularly, the pointer device 88 at the distal end thereof) points upward to the precise location along the string 15 where the next rod 18 is to be connected thereto. In at least some embodiments, the first pointer device 86 points to the stake location 61 while the second pointer device 88 simultaneously points to the rod connection point, thereby permitting an operator to install the stake 17 and the rod 18 and connect the string 15 without having to reposition the vehicle 30 or the operational arm 42.
In a simpler arrangement, illustrated in
Alternatively, in still another preferred embodiment (not shown), the machine controller 26 of
Although likewise not illustrated, it will be appreciated that any of these arrangements may be supplemented with an arm-mounted locator assembly 80 as described in
In at least some embodiments of the present invention, the process of driving a stake 17 into the ground at each location 61 indicated by the arm-mounted locator assembly 80 may be automated. For example, when the vehicle 30 reaches the vicinity of a new stake location, the vehicle 30 may be stopped and placed into a “locked” state and the operational arm 42 may be loaded with a stake and rod assembly 16. Loading the operational arm 42 may be accomplished manually or automatically by removing a stringline stake and rod assembly 16 from a trailer optionally pulled behind the vehicle 30 or from any other suitable carrying location. The operational arm 42 may then place the stake 17 in the proper location 61 with the proper orientation, and drive the stake 17 into the ground. The automated arm assembly 40 must at least be capable of a positioning accuracy such that the stake placement is within the adjustment range of the stringline rod 18. Initially, it is contemplated that placing and driving the stake 17 within a radius of one foot around the desired stringline stake position 61 will be sufficient.
Once again, during this process, the operational arm 42 also maintains the position of the string 15. Thus, once the stake 17 is in place, the disposition of the rod 18 may be readily adjusted by manipulating the clamp 19 until the string-holding end of the rod 18 is located at the necessary height, distance from the stake 17, and orientation. Once so arranged, the string 15 may then be easily mounted on the rod 18 using conventional means. When the process is complete, the operator may then remove the vehicle 30 from its “locked” position or state and drive it to the next stake location. The process is then repeated for each stake location 61 in the design.
In at least some embodiments of the present invention, the stake location 61 identified by the arm-mounted locator assembly 80 is known, at least relative to the distal end 54 of the operational arm 42, and thus this location 61 may be recorded as installed data for “as-built” documentation.
Alternatively, a robotic method of precisely installing the string 15 in conjunction with the robotic installation of the stakes 17 may be developed and applied. Preferably, the stakes 17 are placed and the string 15 attached in the precise location during a single pass through the installation area. In order to achieve this type of operation, the geometry between the stake 17, rod 18, and string 15 must be controlled. This control can be implemented with either fixed geometry between the parts of the stringline 14, such that the geometry is consistent and predictable, or with means to manipulate the geometries from detectable and measurable positions to stable and calculable positions with the required accuracy, even after use in harsh field environments. It is contemplated that positioning accuracy within +/−0.125 inches will be sufficient. In other words, the string-holding end of each rod 18 must be placed within an eighth of an inch of its intended location. Once the stake and rod assembly 16 is installed with the string-holding end of the rod 18 in the proper location, the string 15 may be automatically attached or mounted within the rod's holding slot. Further, a system for such automatic installation preferably includes means for tying-off and tensioning the string 15 such that it maintains its position when in use guiding the operation of a conventional slip form paving machine 12.
Once the stringline 14 has been fully installed, using any of the systems 10,110,210,310 or variations thereof described above, a conventional slip form paving machine 12 may be operated to form the desired curb and gutter installation 13, as shown in
Based on the foregoing information, it is readily understood by those persons skilled in the art that the present invention is susceptible of broad utility and application. Many embodiments and adaptations of the present invention other than those specifically described herein, as well as many variations, modifications, and equivalent arrangements, will be apparent from or reasonably suggested by the present invention and the foregoing descriptions thereof, without departing from the substance or scope of the present invention.
Accordingly, while the present invention has been described herein in detail in relation to its preferred embodiment, it is to be understood that this disclosure is only illustrative and exemplary of the present invention and is made merely for the purpose of providing a full and enabling disclosure of the invention. The foregoing disclosure is not intended to be construed to limit the present invention or otherwise exclude any such other embodiments, adaptations, variations, modifications or equivalent arrangements; the present invention being limited only by the claims appended hereto and the equivalents thereof. Although specific terms are employed herein, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for the purpose of limitation.
The present application is a U.S. nonprovisional patent application of, and claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to, each of: U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/910,247, filed Apr. 5, 2007, U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/910,243, filed Apr. 5, 2007, and U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/910,251, filed Apr. 5, 2007, and each of these provisional patent applications is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3763567 | Hudis | Oct 1973 | A |
4185712 | Bulger | Jan 1980 | A |
4197032 | Miller | Apr 1980 | A |
4319859 | Wise | Mar 1982 | A |
4526493 | Hall et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4726682 | Harms et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4789266 | Clarke, Jr. et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4808026 | Clarke, Jr. et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4943119 | Zarniko et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4961173 | Sehr et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4988233 | Kasler et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5035290 | Harms et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5035384 | Werthmann | Jul 1991 | A |
5046888 | King | Sep 1991 | A |
5051025 | Taylor, Jr. | Sep 1991 | A |
5059062 | Bresnahan | Oct 1991 | A |
5061115 | Godbersen et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5062737 | Samuels | Nov 1991 | A |
5101360 | Bennett | Mar 1992 | A |
5173309 | Belarde | Dec 1992 | A |
5190397 | Bengford et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5209602 | Godbersen | May 1993 | A |
5258961 | Sehr et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
D344942 | Gilman et al. | Mar 1994 | S |
5309407 | Sehr et al. | May 1994 | A |
5318377 | Swisher, Jr. et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5352063 | Allen et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5405212 | Swisher, Jr. et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5477459 | Clegg et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5492432 | Eben et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5533888 | Belarde | Jul 1996 | A |
5549412 | Malone | Aug 1996 | A |
5553407 | Stump | Sep 1996 | A |
5588776 | Swisher, Jr. et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5616291 | Belarde | Apr 1997 | A |
5659985 | Stump | Aug 1997 | A |
5662431 | Colvard | Sep 1997 | A |
D386152 | Warneke | Nov 1997 | S |
5704142 | Stump | Jan 1998 | A |
5745074 | Laude | Apr 1998 | A |
5791815 | Rowe | Aug 1998 | A |
5862501 | Talbot et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5903235 | Nichols | May 1999 | A |
5924817 | Godbersen | Jul 1999 | A |
5929807 | Viney et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5935183 | Sahm et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5941659 | Godbersen | Aug 1999 | A |
5944770 | Enge et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5951613 | Sahm et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5977908 | Nichols | Nov 1999 | A |
5984420 | Murray et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5988936 | Smith | Nov 1999 | A |
6027282 | Horn | Feb 2000 | A |
6033031 | Campbell | Mar 2000 | A |
6047227 | Henderson et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6052083 | Wilson | Apr 2000 | A |
6055486 | Minnich et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6067046 | Nichols | May 2000 | A |
6099204 | Godbersen | Aug 2000 | A |
6109111 | Heimbruch et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6109825 | Yon | Aug 2000 | A |
6119376 | Stump | Sep 2000 | A |
6171016 | Pauls et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6171018 | Ohtomo et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6191732 | Carlson et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195922 | Stump | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6234713 | Rowe et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6253160 | Hanseder | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6286607 | Ohtomo et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6295746 | Meduna et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304210 | Allison et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312194 | Simons | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330503 | Sharp et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332736 | Cape et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6364028 | Ferrell et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6367764 | Butler | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371566 | Haehn | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6384823 | Donoghue | May 2002 | B1 |
6386793 | Lenz et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6421926 | Cappuccio | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425186 | Oliver | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6427441 | Wustefeld et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6430504 | Gilbert et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6457779 | Busley et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6467383 | Charbonnier | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6467992 | Dietrich | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6471442 | Deeb et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477795 | Stump | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6481924 | Smolders et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
D467824 | Svendsen et al. | Dec 2002 | S |
6497531 | Sipherd et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6508606 | James, III et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6520716 | Rower | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6529828 | Williams et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6540435 | Lizarraga | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6577141 | Gandrud | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6579037 | Guntert et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6582152 | Leone et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6587891 | Janky et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6594912 | Ashjaee | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6628308 | Greenberg et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6633256 | Zhdanov et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6640687 | Frantz et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6655465 | Carlson et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6655869 | Deeb et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6679649 | Capolupo | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6692185 | Colvard | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6701647 | Stump | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6709195 | Piccoli et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6711838 | Staub et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6715957 | Colvard et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6736216 | Savard et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
D492306 | Martin et al. | Jun 2004 | S |
6772565 | Schlitz et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6782320 | Bahder | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6791492 | Miyasaka et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6799922 | Smith | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6805516 | Barnat et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6817253 | Gandrud | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6837046 | Gollner | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6841100 | Seppanen | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6849211 | Jarvinen et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6862525 | Beason et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6871138 | Minelli | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6872028 | Aeschlimann et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6877818 | Gaertner et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6880643 | Zimmerman et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6883815 | Archer | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6890123 | Piccoli | May 2005 | B2 |
6904394 | Jaffrey | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6912455 | Beek | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6916070 | Sehr | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6923290 | MacLeod et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6923630 | Allen | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6925892 | Gandrud | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6934631 | Dentinger et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
D509760 | Burrell et al. | Sep 2005 | S |
6947820 | Ohtomo et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6950059 | Rapoport et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6966387 | Marriott, Jr. et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6966859 | Pollman | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6970069 | Murphy | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6971472 | Pedersen et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6984089 | Colvard | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7003386 | Ericsson et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7393156 | Dunstan | Jul 2008 | B1 |
20030074812 | Stump | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040028476 | Payne et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040057795 | Mayfield et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040161299 | Smith | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040168358 | Stump | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050264445 | Brabec et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060198700 | Maier et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070058161 | Nichols et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080253834 | Colvard | Oct 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19951297 | Apr 2001 | DE |
2000500195 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2000319815 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2001512543 | Aug 2001 | JP |
1020050115234 | Dec 2005 | KR |
9534849 | Dec 1995 | WO |
2008124657 | Oct 2008 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080253835 A1 | Oct 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60910247 | Apr 2007 | US | |
60910243 | Apr 2007 | US | |
60910251 | Apr 2007 | US |