Automatic aircraft separation assurance

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20170084183
  • Publication Number
    20170084183
  • Date Filed
    September 18, 2015
    10 years ago
  • Date Published
    March 23, 2017
    9 years ago
Abstract
The present invention replaces the use of a pilot information display method and instead relies upon an automated three dimensional aircraft tracking system using only aircraft tracking data supplied by internal spherical coverage dual mode sensor system. Separation is accurately predicted and minimum flight path separation (from all nearby aircraft) is automatically assured by signals to the aircraft flight control system without action or intervention by the pilot. When predicted separation is less than minimum separation for the host aircraft, flight control is temporarily removed from the pilot until the automated system redirects the flight path to enable the predicted separation to exceed the minimum separation for the host aircraft. When on-board sensor system predicts separation greater than required minimum, then flight control is returned to the pilot.
Description
REFERENCES CITED

U.S. Pat. No. 8,744,738 June 2014 Bushwell


This patent describes prediction of flight path for own aircraft and for second aircraft, determines minimum projected separation, but relies on data supplied from external data sources. No description of on-board sensor data to provide tracking data for second aircraft


U.S. Pat. No. 8,380,424 February 2013 Bushwell


This patent describes prediction of flight path for own aircraft and for second aircraft, determines minimum projected separation, but relies on data supplied from external data sources. No description of on-board sensor data to provide tracking data for second aircraft


U.S. Pat. No. 7,706,979 April 2010 Hefferwitz


Data source used for developing tracking predictions and separation are only from outside the aircraft. No description of on-board sensing.


U.S. Pat. No. 7,580,776 August 2009 McCusker


This patent has no description of on board sensor capability, but does use path prediction to project minimum separation. Pilot notified, pilot has final responsibility for collision avoidance.


All current references and published literature for aircraft separation assurance and/or air traffic collision avoidance systems are based on using data supplied by external sources, and/or internal data sources, but wherein pilot (human operator) has ultimate responsibility for air collision prevention (URCP). Pilot's own aircraft flight path control (whether pilot is in cockpit or in a ground station for UAS) is via manual operational control means. Pilot flight path control is optionally aided by automated navigation and flight control systems that collect and employ the referenced external/internal data sources. The pilot is assisted by displays during manual and automated flight control, including those displays associated with an on-board Traffic Collision Avoidance System (TCAS, when that system is installed). Result is that pilot (human) inspection of a display plus exercise of human judgement is required before adequate separation from other aircraft can be achieved for the host aircraft. This shortcoming of existing flight control systems can result in pilot error regarding maintenance of adequate separation and guarantee of collision avoidance at all times. Elevation of the separation assurance (and collision avoidance) probability (to level that is guaranteed) requires the temporary elimination of the human pilot (on the ground or in the cockpit) in the flight control loop. That probability elevation step requires use of an on-board system that is independent of all external sources of traffic control data. Guarantee of automatic separation assurance under the described invention is enabled by incorporation of features that also automatically and continually calibrate and functionally validate reliable system operation. Therefore, the method and system herein described temporarily accepts and guarantees URCP.


The present invention replaces the use of a pilot information display method and instead relies upon an automated three dimensional aircraft tracking system so that separation is accurately measured and minimum flight path separation (from all nearby aircraft) is automatically assured by signals to the aircraft flight control system without action or intervention by the pilot. The pilot will be notified by a display that the automated separation assurance system is temporarily controlling the aircraft flight and the pilot will again be notified when flight control is returned to the pilot. Three dimensional separation tracking is enabled by use of dual sensor modes; that is use of co-bore-sighted high resolution three dimensional radar with two dimensional electro-optical camera. This use of three dimensional tracking assures higher reliability of the separation assurance system and allows the separation assurance and collision avoidance to be automated. This system eliminates any possible pilot error and results in greater air safety for manned or unmanned aircraft. A display showing minimum separation distance (in KM), based upon tracking data and projected flight path for all aircraft in the vicinity is provided at all times to the pilot of a manned aircraft or to the operator of unmanned aircraft. This data provides direct evidence that the system is functional and reliable. This system only removes flight control from the pilot if separation distance is compromised and only for a brief period of time until separation distance is restored to a value higher than the minimum. This automated system operates in virtual real time and has higher probability of preventing collision threat from nearby aircraft that systems that rely on pilot display and pilot decision by eliminating all possibility of human error.












Table of Claims Comparison










Claim # and Summary
U.S. Pat. No. 8,744,738
U.S. Pat. No. 7,706,979
U.S. Pat. No. 7,580,776





1 Automatic Separation
Path prediction based on
Path prediction depends
Relies upon external


Assurance Sensor suite
externally supplied data
on externally supplied
data inputs to predict


uses dual mode sensor
generating commands to
data or use of
aircraft path; collision


(radar plus EO/IR
pilot for separation;
transponders (not on all
avoidance depends


camera) using only
commands that may be
aircraft) so method is
upon pilot decision,


internal sensor to
result in pilot decision
not universal to
which may be in error


eliminate pilot error &
error. No spherical sensor.
guarantee collision
based on supplied


2 ASAS
Computer predicts time of
Estimation of time of
No corresponding


characterized by
closest approach based
closest approach based
claim


on-board dual
on external inputs; no
on stored equations



mode sensor
internal sensor provides
using externally



having spherical
certain data for reliability
supplied data on aircraft



field-of-regard
of such prediction
future path



3 AASA spherical
Internal hemispherical
Additional cubic
No corresponding


coverage by combining
sensors not described
equation but no
claim


two opposing

external sensor to



hemispherical sensor

assure separation



4 Multiplicity of on-
Breach of closest
Estimated aircraft
No corresponding


board dual mode
approach based on
position vectors
claim


sector sensors make
external data, not on-
obtained from external



up the hemispherical
board sensor
sources



5 On-board Sector
Flight control commands
Air vehicle avoidance
No corresponding


sensors are dual mode
generated from external
by pilot flight control
claim


using radar and camera
data
using 3D display of



6 On-board 3D
Computer
Graphic
No on-


radar plus 2D
generates
displays for
board


video provide
commands
pilot based
sensor


data for
based on
on external
claim


7 3D tracking
Computer
Aircraft
No on-


provided by processor
alters flight
position
board


fusion of outputs from
path based on
vectors
sensor


two on-board sensors
externally
determined
claim



supplied data
from






text missing or illegible when filed




8 Hemispherical
Aircraft maneuver
Estimated closest
No corresponding


field-of-regard
altered by flight control
approach by computer
claim


provided by
based on externally
from external data for



combining on-board
supplied aircraft
pilot in cockpit or at



sensor output data
position data
ground station of



from sector field-of-

unmanned aircraft



view for all sectors





in the hemisphere





9 Spherical Field-
Commands for
Aircraft position
No corresponding


of-Regard
aircraft maneuver
projection and
claim


covered by
altered by flight
maneuver altered by



combining
control based on
flight control based



coverage of two
externally supplied
on externally



on-board
aircraft position data
supplied aircraft




text missing or illegible when filed



text missing or illegible when filed




10 Processor
Separation distance
Estimated closest
No corresponding


predicts
prediction is based on
approach by computer
claim


minimum
externally supplied
from external data for



separation
position data which may
pilot in cockpit or at



distance from
omit certain nearby
ground station of



on-board sensor
aircraft having lesser
unmanned aircraft but



tracking data for
separation distance
not tracking nearby non-



spherical field-

cooperating aircraft



of-regard





11 Processor
Pilot makes the decision
Graphic display for pilot
No corresponding


temporarily
to change aircraft flight
is used by pilot to
claim


disables pilot
if display indicates
enable flight control



flight control if
separation distance is
system to change



separation
less than minimum
direction if separation



distance is
separation distance
distance is below



below minimum

minimum separation



separation

distance for host aircraft



distance for






text missing or illegible when filed






12 Cockpit
No indication in claims
2D or 3D display
No corresponding


display provided
that aircraft position and
provides prediction of
claim


indicating
minimum separation
separation distance



separation
distance is presented to
computation based on



distance
pilot on a cockpit display
externally supplied data



determined from

by GPS or other



on-board

external means



spherical dual





mode sensor






text missing or illegible when filed






13 Processor
On board computer
Computer programmed
No corresponding


commands from
sends commands for
to reduce the delta
claim


on-board sensor
flight maneuver based
separation using



to flight control
on data provided by
external data from



enable reduction
external sources
satellite or other



in predicted

sources



separation





14 Pilot display
Pilot has flight control at
Computer programmed
No corresponding


indicator that
all times and makes any
to reduce predicted path
claim


pilot flight
decision to avoid
delta using externally



control has been
possible collision. Pilot
supplied location data



disabled when
error is not removed as
for host and other



predicted
possible cause for
aircrafts. Pilot controls



minimum
collision
flight path



separation has





been breached





15 When
Separation module
Computer estimates air
No corresponding


predicted
provides prediction of
vehicle position for
claim


separation
separation for the pilot
cockpit display enabling



exceeds
who retains flight control
pilot to operate flight



minimum
based on externally
controls to avoid



separation then
supplied location data.
collision. Possible pilot



pilot control is
Collision can result from
error is not avoided



restored based
pilot error or unreliable




on data from on-
external data





text missing or illegible when filed







text missing or illegible when filed indicates data missing or illegible when filed







TECHNICAL FIELD

The invention relates to the field of avionics airborne flight safety and in particular to an apparatus and method for automatic air vehicle separation assurance (and collision avoidance) that eliminates any possibility for pilot error aboard a host aircraft (or at ground station for unmanned aircraft) or failure of external flight traffic control systems data input. Elimination of pilot or human error potentially elevates aircraft, separation assurance, collision avoidance and aviation safety to a new level for manned and unmanned aircraft.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a drawing of an aircraft in which forward and rearward hemispherical, 4Pi steradians, field-of-regard (180 degrees by 180 degrees) are shown along with indication of a small conical sector field-of-view (about 30 degrees by 30 degrees)



FIG. 2 is drawing of a hemispherical subsystem indicating separate conical sectors covering the entire 2Pi field-of-regard.



FIG. 3 is a block diagram for the Automatic Aircraft Separation Assurance sensor suite system





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

A sensor suite for a host aircraft (10) extends the field-of-regard to full spherical coverage, 4Pi steradians. The method and apparatus makes use of two hemispherical sensor subsystems as shown in FIG. 1. A first hemispherical subsystem field-of-regard (12) is directed forward of the aircraft (10) while a second hemispherical subsystem field-of-regard (11) is directed to the rear. Each hemispherical subsystem field-of-regard is composed of many instantaneous search sectors (13) each operating a dual mode sensor for detecting, tracking and characterizing other aircraft.


Drawing of an exemplary dual mode sensor hemispherical subsystem (20) is shown in FIG. 2. Individual sector conical fields-of-view (22) for radar sensor and EO/IR camera are positioned over a conical surface (21). One radar antenna option is a flat patch array (23), however, alternative antenna types include horn, horn-lens, etc. EO/IR camera apertures (24) share the field-of-view sector with a radar sensor antenna (23) and are typically co-boresighted with a radar beam.


A block diagram for the spherical coverage dual mode automatic aircraft separation assurance system (30) is presented in FIG. 3. A forward-directed hemispherical sensor subsystem (32) and a rear-directed hemispherical sensor subsystem (31) are indicated. Output (36) of forward-directed hemispherical subsystem (32) is connected to processor (33). Output (37) of rear-directed hemispherical subsystem (31) is connected to processor (33). Output (38) of the processor (33) is connected to the pilot display (34). A second output (39) of the processor (33) is connected to the host aircraft flight control system (35).

Claims
  • 1. Automatic Aircraft Separation Assurance apparatus and method disposed aboard a host aircraft requiring minimum separation distance, said apparatus including a sensor suite, processor, separation assurance algorithms and pilot display, said method detecting and tracking all aircraft in the spherical field-of-regard of said host aircraft, said processor predicting said host aircraft separation distance, said pilot display informing pilot of predicted separation distance, said pilot display alerting pilot if flight control is removed from the pilot. Said processor operating said separation assurance algorithms on said sensor suite tracking data predicting said host vehicle tracking separation below specified minimum separation for said host aircraft, said AASA apparatus temporarily suspending pilot flight control, supplies direction/altitude commands to said host aircraft flight control system, indicates via said pilot display suspension of pilot flight control. Said direction/altitude commands enable increased tracking separation of said host aircraft to exceed said minimum separation distance. Said sensor suite track data processor separation assurance algorithms return pilot flight control when said separation distance exceeds said minimum separation distance.
  • 2. The AASA apparatus of claim 1 further characterized by dual mode sensor suite for detection and tracking of aircraft in said spherical field-of-regard of said host aircraft.
  • 3. The AASA apparatus of claim 1 further characterized by said dual mode sensor suite having first hemispherical dual mode sensor subsystem mounted and aligned with said host vehicle flight path direction plus second hemispherical dual mode sensor subsystem aligned with said first hemispherical dual mode sensor directed opposing said flight path direction.
  • 4. The AASA apparatus of claim 1 further characterized by said hemispherical dual mode sensor subsystem consisting of a multiplicity of dual mode sector sensors arrayed on a hemispherical surface.
  • 5. The AASA apparatus of claim 1 further characterized by said dual mode sector sensors covering a specified angular sector field-of-view of said hemispherical field-of-regard.
  • 6. The AASA apparatus of claim 1 further characterized by said dual mode sector sensor consisting of three dimensional radar sensor disposed and aligned with two dimensional electro-optical video sensor sharing said sector field-of-view.
  • 7. The AASA apparatus of claim 1 further characterized by said processor fusing output of said three dimensional radar sensor with output of said two dimensional electro-optical sensor to provide three dimensional tracking data for all detected aircraft in said sector field-of-view of said hemisphere field-of-regard.
  • 8. The AASA apparatus of claim 1 further characterized by said processor combining three dimensional tracking data for said host aircraft in said sector field-of-view with three dimensional tracking data for said aircraft from all said dual mode sensor sectors in said first hemispherical field-of-regard.
  • 9. The AASA apparatus of claim 1 further characterized by said processor three dimensional tracking data for said host aircraft spherical field-of-regard combining three dimensional tracking data for first hemispherical field-of-regard with three dimensional tracking data for said host aircraft second hemispherical field-of-regard.
  • 10. The AASA apparatus of claim 1 further characterized by said processor predicting minimum separation distance enabled by said separation assurance algorithms operating on said three dimensional tracking data in said spherical field-of-regard.
  • 11. The AASA apparatus of claim 1 further characterized by said processor temporarily disabling pilot flight control when said predicted separation distance is below said minimum separation distance for said host aircraft.
  • 12. The AASA apparatus of claim 1 further characterized by said cockpit display of said predicted separation distance.
  • 13. The AASA apparatus of claim 1 further characterized by said processor commands to said flight control system enabling change in said host aircraft direction and/or altitude to reduce predicted separation distance.
  • 14. The AASA apparatus of claim 1 further characterized by said cockpit display indicator that pilot flight control has been disabled because said aircraft minimum separation distance has been breached.
  • 15. The AASA apparatus of claim 1 further characterized by said cockpit display that pilot flight control has been restored when said minimum separation distance predicted by said processor has been exceeded.