Modern operating systems may allow operation with multiple display screens. Windows 98, for example, allows two different display cards to be used in the system, each display card running an associated display.
The present application defines automatic arranging of the content on multiple display screens. The arranging is “intelligent” in the sense that the arrangement on the screens depends on environment and/or history in a way to provide meaningful content to the user. The content is variable depending on conditions. In an embodiment, the system learns preferences from previous operations. For example, rules can be applied based on a user's previous settings for a condition.
A specified condition can include its own set of rules.
These and other aspects will now be described in detail with respect to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The computer can also be a multiple processor computer. The operating system can assign threads to the two processors such that each one processor handles the display for a different one of the screens. This is most advantageously accomplished by including the display drivers on the motherboard itself. However, it can also be accomplished on the PCI bus, e.g. by using PCI bridges in which the PCI bus is periodically controlled by alternate processors. The operating system controls the two display devices according to the description given herein.
An alternative computer system with multiple display screens is shown in
The present application is disclosed in the context of a Windows™ type operating system in which multiple windows of information can be open at once. Other operating systems can alternatively be used. The operating system controls the screens as described herein.
The contents of the main screen is defined as usual—as the main or focus screen. The alternative screens 305 and 310 change content based on conditions. The conditions can include the software that is running and/or the software that has run in the past.
Screen 305 shows a content control menu 306. The AUTO setting is the default setting for the screen, but other options can be selected. The content control part can be caused to automatically hide when it is not being used. Placing the cursor over that spot thereafter causes the content control to reappear.
The “auto” setting operates according to a flowchart of preferences indicating the content that the alternative screens will display based on the computer's condition and a previous operation, the “history”. The user can also select to override the automatic operation as disclosed herein. These preferences effectively form “rules”.
Manual operations are also available.
The WINS option causes the auxiliary screen to display reduced versions of all inactive windows as shown in
Therefore, the current focus screen is shown in the main screen 300, while the auxiliary screen 305 shows the
The HISTORY configuration is shown in
Another alternative which can be selected is the desktop, in which the user always sees their DESKTOP in auxiliary screen 305. Other alternatives, not specifically disclosed herein, are also possible.
When the auto selection is selected, the operating system automatically selects which of the multiple modes will appear on the auxiliary screen. This automatic mode configures the auxiliary screen 305 to automatically provide content which is most likely to be the content that is most useful to the user under the conditions. The content can also be based on choices made by the user during a previous operation.
The operation progresses as shown in
At 500, the system first determines if the application is a type which can be displayed on multiple screens without adaptation, e.g. a multi-screen enabled game or application is displayed on the screens as described herein. If so, the content is displayed on the multiple screens at 502.
If 500 is negative, the operation moves to 505 which detects a web browser operation. If a browser is active at 505, the system first determines if the browser is reading a page which has multi screen-capable-frames. Multi-screen frames allow display in either one screen or multiple screens.
If the web browser detects that the current system is not a special multi-screen enabled frame, then the current page is simply displayed on the main screen 300, and the auxiliary screen 305 is then configured to receive the last web page that was opened at 509. In this way, the system displays the current page, and the last page. When the system is operating in this latter mode, it becomes possible to flip screens. Therefore, a special hotkey 392 is displayed on the main screen in an “always on top” mode. If this portion is actuated by a click, then the main and previous screens are switched. At 515, no browser has been detected, so the system determines if an application is running. Different applications are defined, for example in the windows registry. The present application discusses two such applications, a word processing program such as Microsoft Word, an e-mail program and a web page production program such as “Front Page”. These different options are shown in steps 520, 525 and 530 respectively.
In the word processing program, the main screen displays the currently active document, while the auxiliary screen display previously opened documents at 522. The previous documents may be displayed in miniature form (like
Analogously, in an e-mail program at 525, the main screen showing the list of available e-mail or current open e-mails is first displayed. At this time, the auxiliary screen display, in order of preference, the last e-mail screen worked on, if not, the last window displayed, and if not the desktop at 525.
The development program, here a web page development program at 530, displays the main control and the main screen on the main screen 300 at 532. The auxiliary screen shows other web pages which are linked to the main web page. If no such pages have yet been formed, the auxiliary screens can show other hidden toolbars and help screens.
In this way, the user need not configure the multiple screens. Rather they are automatically configured for the user based on data about what the user might want.
While this system provides preferences, it should be understood that the user may have their own preference that differs from the presets. The system provides a customization feature. However, it is understood that real customization features are usually only fully utilized by so called power users. Therefore this system provides both a direct customization feature, and also a context-imitating customization feature. The real customization feature is shown in
In addition, the rule-based interface enables different operations at different times. For example, as shown, the user can specify an additional “If” 718. For example, if more than four documents are open, then use the alternative screen in a different way than it would be used if 3 or fewer documents are open. A priority 730 is also set, to determine how to handle multiple rules. The priority sets the order of execution of the rules.
Each of these preferences is then compiled into a plurality of text-based rules shown in
The rules are assembled based on their priority. Each time a rule is completed, the go button 740 is executed. This rule is then added to the end of the list for that priority assigned to that rule. For example,
The rules are shown above as editable using pull down boxes of alternatives. However, the rules can alternatively be plain text type rules, e.g., using Visual Basic or other comparable programming language. The rules can also be written as part of a registry file, e.g., the WINDOWS™ registry. Any form of rule which has conditions and results can be used.
In addition to the manual editing of the rules, the rules can be automatically formed and/or changed by context type automatic formation. Each time a window is displayed, the user has the capability to override the current contents of that window. This can be done using the menu 306, for example. The flowchart effecting that manual operation is shown in
A change is detected at 900. Once the change is detected, the conditions of the change are detected at 905. That is, a currently running application is detected and all Ifs associated with that currently running application are pulled up. A determination is then made about whether the current condition represents the currently active condition associated with “Then”, or one of auxiliary “Elses”. At step 910, the system executes the new display condition. This is done by accepting the operation executed in the menu. At step 915 the rule is changed to indicate the new preferences. Of course, this possibility can be overridden. If no rule is found at 905, then a new rule of priority 5 is formed at 920.
Other modifications are contemplated. For example, other forms could be used to express the rules and the preferences. While this system is disclosed for use in editing rules for display, it should be understood that the selectable form of if-then-else that is described for setting preferences could be used for other preference setting operations, such as in the Windows registry or other comparable preference setting parts. All such modifications are intended to be encompassed within the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/569,816, filed May 12, 2000.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4566004 | Emerson | Jan 1986 | A |
4933885 | Kato et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5179648 | Hauck | Jan 1993 | A |
5283856 | Gross et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5307055 | Baskin et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5315697 | Nagamatsu | May 1994 | A |
5481735 | Mortensen et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5682486 | Grossman et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5682529 | Hendry et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5694121 | Krause et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5727155 | Dawson | Mar 1998 | A |
5745109 | Nakano et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5757371 | Oran et al. | May 1998 | A |
5760776 | McGurrin et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5796397 | Kusano | Aug 1998 | A |
5889517 | Ueda et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5923307 | Hogle, IV | Jul 1999 | A |
5927307 | King | Jul 1999 | A |
5995085 | Bowen | Nov 1999 | A |
5999177 | Martinez | Dec 1999 | A |
6002395 | Wagner et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006225 | Bowman et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6043817 | Bolnick et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6104359 | Endres et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6144358 | Narayanaswamy et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6191758 | Lee | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6297817 | Larson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310655 | Godwin | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6327482 | Miyashita | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331840 | Nielson et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6338004 | Usui | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6456304 | Angiulo et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6522309 | Weber | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6587082 | Moore | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6728680 | Aaron et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6859219 | Sall | Feb 2005 | B1 |
7007240 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7030837 | Vong et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7032172 | Lee et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
20050149879 | Jobs et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0822436 | Jan 1996 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09569816 | May 2000 | US |
Child | 11775868 | US |