The present disclosure relates to illumination and inspection of a substrate, particularly illumination and inspection of specular surfaces of a silicon wafer edge with diffuse light from a plurality of light sources for enhanced viewing of the wafer edge.
The statements in this section merely provide background information related to the present disclosure and may not constitute prior art.
Substrate processing, particularly silicon wafer processing involves deposition and etching of films and other processes at various stages in the eventual manufacture of integrated circuits. Because of this processing, contaminants, particles, and other defects develop in the edge area of the wafer. This includes particles, contaminants and other defects such as chips, cracks or delamination that develop on edge exclusion zones (near edge top surface and near edge back surface), and edge (including top bevel, crown and bottom bevel) of the wafer. It has been shown that a significant percentage of yield loss, in terms of final integrated circuits, results from particulate contamination originating from the edge area of the wafer causing killer defects inside the FQA (fixed quality area) portion of the wafer. See for example, Braun, The Wafer's Edge, Semiconductor International (Mar. 1, 2006), for a discussion of defects and wafer edge inspection methodologies.
Attempts at high magnification inspection of this region of the wafer have been confounded by poor illumination of these surfaces. It is difficult to properly illuminate and inspect the edge area of an in-process wafer. An in-process wafer typically has a reflective specular (“mirror”) surface. Attempts at illuminating this surface from a surface normal position frequently results in viewing reflections of surrounding environment of the wafer edge thus making it difficult to visualize defects or distinguish the defects from reflective artifact. Further, the wafer edge area has a plurality of specular surfaces extending from the near edge top surface across the top bevel, the crown, the bottom bevel to the near edge bottom surface. These too cause non-uniform reflection of light necessary for viewing the wafer edge area and defect inspection. In addition, color fidelity to observed films and contrast of lighting are important considerations for any wafer edge inspection system.
Therefore, there is a need for a system that adequately illuminates the edge area of a wafer for inspection. It is important that the system provide for illumination and viewing suitable for a highly reflective surface extending over a plurality of surfaces and for a variety of defects to be observed. The system must provide for efficient and effective inspection of the edge area for a variety of defects.
Further areas of applicability will become apparent from the description provided herein. It should be understood that the description and specific examples are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure.
The object of the present invention is to provide a color image-based edge defect inspection and review system. It comprises an illuminator to provide uniform diffused illumination across the five wafer edge regions: top near edge surface, top bevel, apex, bottom bevel and bottom near edge surface, an optical imaging subsystem to image a portion of wafer edge supported by a wafer chuck, a positioning assembly to orientate the optical imaging subsystem to the user-defined inspection angle, an eccentricity sensor to actively measure the center offset of a wafer relative to the rotation center of the wafer chuck, a wafer chuck to hold the backside of a wafer onto the supporting pins, a linear stage to move a wafer from its load position to the inspection position, a rotary stage rotates the wafer in a step-and-stop fashion, a control console to provide tool control functions as well as at least the following capabilities: 1) automatic capture of defects of interest with enough sensitivity and speed, 2) automatic defect detection and classification, 3) automatic measurement of wafer edge exclusion width; and 4) automatic report of inspection results to the yield management system of a semiconductor fabrication plant.
In accordance with the present disclosure, a substrate illumination system has a light diffuser with an opening extending at least a portion of its length for receiving an edge of a wafer. The system also comprises a plurality of light sources in proximity to the light diffuser. The system further comprises an optic for viewing the wafer wherein the optic is exterior of the light diffuser and is angled off of the wafer edge surface normal position.
In an additional aspect, the system comprises an illumination control system for independently controlling the plurality of light sources. Individually or by groups or sections, the plurality of lights can be dimmed or brightened. In addition, the plurality of lights can change color, individually or by groups or sections. Yet another aspect of the system comprises a rotation mechanism for rotating the optic from a position facing the top of the wafer to a position facing the bottom of the wafer. In an additional aspect of the system, the plurality of light sources is an LED matrix or alternatively a flexible OLED or LCD. In this aspect the flexible OLED or LCD can act in place of the plurality of lights or in place of both the light diffuser and the plurality of lights. The light sources can also be one or more halogen lamps. The one or more halogen lamps can be coupled to an array of fiber optics.
In yet an additional aspect, the system comprises a method for imaging the specular surface of a substrate. This method comprises, isolating a portion of the substrate in a light diffuser, emitting light onto the specular surface to be imaged and imaging the specular surface with an optic positioned at an angle off the specular surface normal from a position exterior to the light emitter.
The drawings described herein are for illustration purposes only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure in any way.
The following description is merely exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the present disclosure, application, or uses. It should be understood that throughout the drawings, corresponding reference numerals indicate like or corresponding parts and features.
Referring to
The system 10 can be used to uniformly illuminate for brightfield inspection of all surfaces of an edge area of the substrate 22 including, a near edge top surface 24, a near edge bottom surface 26, a top bevel 28, a bottom bevel 30 and a crown 32.
The optic 18 is a lens or combination of lenses, prisms, and related optical hardware. The optic 18 is aimed at the substrate 22 at an angle off a surface normal to the crown 32 of the substrate 22. The angle of the optic 18 advantageously allows for preventing a specular surface of the substrate 22 from reflecting back the optic 18 whereby the optic 18 “sees itself.” The viewing angle is typically 3 to 6 degrees off normal. Some optimization outside of this range is possible depending on illuminator alignment relative to the substrate 22 and the specific optic 18 configuration.
The imaging system 20 is for example a charge-coupled device (CCD) camera suitable for microscopic imaging. The imaging system 20 may be connected to a display monitor and/or computer (not shown) for viewing, analyzing, and storing images of the substrate 22.
Diffuser 12 is formed of a translucent material suitable for providing uniform diffuse illumination. The diffuser 12 may be formed of a frosted glass, a sand blasted quartz or a plastic or the like, where light passing through it is uniformly diffused. In a preferred embodiment, the diffuser 12 is a circular cylinder as illustrated. Diffuser 12 may be an elliptic cylinder, generalized cylinder, or other shape that allows for surrounding and isolating a portion of a substrate 22 including the substrate 22 edge. The slot 14 in the diffuser 12 extends for a suitable length to allow introduction of the substrate 22 into the diffuser 12 far enough to provide uniform illumination of the edge area and to isolate the edge area from the outside of the diffuser 12.
Importantly, the interior of the diffuser 12 serves as a uniform neutral background for any reflection from the specular surface of the substrate 22 that is captured by the optic 18. Thus, the optic 18 while looking towards focal point F on the specular surface of the crown 32 images (sees) the interior of the diffuser 12 at location I. Similarly, the optic 18 looking towards focal points F′ and F″ on the specular surfaces of the top bevel 28 and bottom bevel 30 respectively, images the interior of the diffuser 12 at locations I′ and I″.
The angle of the optic 18 in cooperation with the diffuser 12 prevents reflective artifacts from interfering with viewing the plurality of specular surfaces of the edge area of the substrate 22. Instead, and advantageously, a uniform background of the diffuser 12 interior is seen in the reflection of the specular surfaces of the substrate 22.
The plurality of lights 16 is a highly incoherent light source including an incandescent light. In a preferred embodiment, the plurality of lights 16 is an array of LEDs. Alternatively, a quartz halogen bulb can be the light source with fiber optics (not shown) used to distribute light of this single light source radially around the diffuser 12. In another preferred embodiment the plurality of lights 16 is an array of fiber optics each coupled to an independent, remotely located quartz tungsten halogen (QTH) lamp.
The plurality of lights 16 is preferably a white light source to provide the best color fidelity. In substrate 22 observation, color fidelity is important because of film thickness information conveyed by thin film interference colors. If the substrate 22 surface is illuminated with light having some spectral bias, the thin film interference information can be distorted. Slight amounts of spectral bias in the light source can be accommodated by using filters and/or electronic adjustment (i.e., camera white balance).
In operation, a substrate 22, for example, a wafer is placed on a rotatable chuck (not shown) that moves the edge of the wafer into the slot 14 of the diffuser 12. The light controller 34 activates in suitable brightness the plurality of lights 16 for providing uniform illumination of the edge area of the wafer. The wafer is viewed through the imaging system 20 via the optic 18 and inspected for defects. The wafer may be automatically rotated or manually rotated to allow for selective viewing of the wafer edge. Thus, observation of the wafer edge for defects is facilitated and is unhindered by a specular surface of the wafer.
With added reference to
The intensity of a portion of the plurality of lights 16 is dimmed or brightened to anticipate the reflective effect of specular surfaces that are inherent to the substrate 22, particularly at micro locations along the edge profile that have very small radii of curvature. These micro locations are the transition zones 33 where the top surface 24 meets the top bevel 28 and the top bevel meets the crown 32 and the crown meets the bottom bevel 30 and the bottom bevel 30 meets the bottom surface 26.
An example of addressable illumination is illustrated in
Further, addressable illumination is useful to accommodate intensity variation seen by the optic 18 due to view factor of the substrate 22 edge area. Some portions of the substrate 22 edge area have a high view factor with respect to the illumination from the diffuser 12 and consequently appear relatively bright. Other portions with low view factor appear relatively dark. Addressable illumination allows mapping an intensity profile onto the wafer surface that allows for the view factor variation and provides a uniformly illuminated image. The required intensity profile can change with viewing angle change of the optic 18.
Addressability of the illumination or its intensity can be accomplished in a number of ways. One embodiment is to locate independently controllable light-emitting diodes (LEDs) around the outside of the diffuser 12 consistent with the plurality of lights 16. Another alternative is to employ a small flexible organic light-emitting diode (OLED), liquid crystal display (LCD) or other micro-display module. Such modules are addressable to a much greater degree than an LED matrix. In this embodiment the flexible OLED, LCD or other micro-display module can replace both the plurality of lights 16 and the diffuser 12. For example, a flexible OLED can both illuminate and have a surface layer with a matte finish suitable for acting as a diffuser and neutral background for imaging. Further, the flexible OLED can be formed into a suitable shape such as a cylinder. Examples of a suitable OLED are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,019,717 and 7,005,671, incorporated herein by reference.
Further, those modules can also provide programmable illumination across a broad range of colors including white light. Color selection can be used to highlight different thin films and can be used in combination with part of an OLED, for example, emitting one color while another part of the OLED emits another color of light. In some cases it can be beneficial to use only part of the light spectrum, for example, to gain sensitivity to a film residue in a given thickness range. This is one mode of analysis particularly applicable to automatic defect classification. One analysis technique to detect backside etch polymer residue preferentially looks at light reflected in the green portion of the spectrum. Thus, this embodiment of the system 10 provides for a suitable color differential based inspection of the substrate 22.
Now referring to
Now referring to
The operation of this embodiment of the system 10 is substantially the same as described above with the additional functionality of radially moving the optic 18 to further aid in inspecting all surfaces of the edge of the substrate 22. Further, the substrate 22 can be rotated either manually or automatically by the rotatable chuck 56 to facilitate the inspection process.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The motorized zoom lens 125 can be configured in the low magnification range for inspection purpose and high magnification range for review purpose. As shown in
The control console 76 controls the system 10 via the tool control software. In this regard, the console 76 controls the motion of linear stage 72 and rotary stage 74, positioning the assembly 68 to the user-defined inspection angle. The controller further presets the magnification of the motorized zoom lens 125 and focus position of the motorized focus lens 124, initializing the image acquisition timing and other essential functions to complete the automatic inspection of a wafer using user-predefined routines. The control console 76 also displays the acquired images and runs the defect inspection and classification software, reporting the results files to a factory automation system.
Referring generally to
Then, the wafer is rotated and the eccentricity sensor 70 starts to measure the eccentricity of the wafer relatively to the spin center of the rotary stage 74. The eccentricity information is fed back to the control console 76. At the same time, the positioning assembly 68 moves the optical imaging subsystem 64 to the routine inspection angle. Then the linear stage 72 moves the substrate 22 to the inspection position from the load position. The rotary stage 74 starts to move forward one step (routine-defined angle) and stops completely. The illuminator 11 is turned on, and the camera 127 takes an image of the portion of the wafer edge within the field of view of the optical imaging system 64. After completion, the rotary stage 74 rotates one more step, settling down completely. The linear stage 72 moves the substrate 22 to the best focus position based on the eccentricity data stored in the control console 76. During the movement of the stage 72, the control console 76 downloads the previous images from the camera to the onboard memory and the hard disk media. Then, the camera 127 takes the second picture of the wafer edge. The above steps are repeated until the region of interest or the whole circumference of the substrate 22 is imaged.
If the system is set to inspect the edge regions of substrate 22 in more than one inspection angles, the control console 76 moves the positioning assembly 68 to another inspection angle, repeating the steps described above. The images of the edge of the substrate 22 at the new inspection angle are recorded until all inspection angles of interest are covered.
After the completion of imaging all the predefined edge regions of substrate 22, the transport robot arm 27 picks the substrate 22 from the inspection chamber, and place it back to a FOUP or a cassette in the equipment front end module.
While the system 10 takes pictures of the edge of substrate 22, the inspection and classification software installed in control console 76 processes the raw images, detects the defects of interest, classifies them into different classes or category and outputs to the results files. To review a specific defect found by the system 10, the location and the inspection angle of the specific defect can be retrieved from the results files. As shown in
Referring to
During operation, the control console 76 processes the recorded images to calculate the profile of the cut line 141 as well as the following parameters: the center disposition from the wafer center, mean edge exclusion distance, the standard deviation, and the peak-to-peak variation. The results are output to the results file with predefined format.
As shown in
It should be appreciated that while the embodiments of the system 10 are described in relation to an automated system, a manual system would also be suitable. This includes a hybrid automated/manual inspection with automated or manual defect classification as described in U.S. Provisional Patent Application 60/964,163, filed Aug. 9, 2007, entitled “Apparatus and Method for Wafer Edge Defects Detection” and U.S. Provisional Patent Application 60/964,149, filed Aug. 9, 2007, entitled “Apparatus and Method for Wafer Edge Exclusion Measurement”, both incorporated herein by reference. This also includes automated inspection in conjunction with automated wafer handling including robotic wafer handling with wafers delivered via FOUP or FOSB.
Thus, a cost effective yet efficient and effective system is provided for illuminating and inspecting the plurality of surfaces of the edge area of a substrate 22 and providing high quality imaging of the inspected surfaces while avoiding the interference associated with specular surfaces. The system provides for improving quality control of wafer processing through edge inspection with the intended benefit of identifying and addressing defects and their causes in the IC manufacturing process with resulting improvement in yield and throughput.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/417,297, filed on May 2, 2006, entitled “Substrate Illumination and Inspection System”. The disclosure of the above application is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4099831 | Freeman | Jul 1978 | A |
5172005 | Cochran et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5461417 | White et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5629607 | Callahan et al. | May 1997 | A |
5825482 | Nikoonahad et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5864394 | Jordan, III et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5883710 | Nikoonahad et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5912735 | Xu | Jun 1999 | A |
6021380 | Fredriksen et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6081325 | Leslie et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6147357 | Nicolesco | Nov 2000 | A |
6208411 | Vaez-Iravani | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215551 | Nikoonahad et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217034 | Smedt et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6282309 | Emery | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6369524 | Sid | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6414752 | Sullivan et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6433561 | Satya et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6483638 | Shafer et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6525883 | Hirohara et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6538375 | Duggal et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6538730 | Vaez-Iravani et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6559938 | Smedt | May 2003 | B1 |
6560011 | Chuang et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6578961 | Vaez-Iravani | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6603541 | Lange | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6608676 | Zhao et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6614507 | Young et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6614520 | Bareket et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6636301 | Kvamme et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6636302 | Nikoonahad et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6661521 | Stern | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6661580 | Solarz | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6674522 | Krantz et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6686996 | Sullivan et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6724473 | Leong et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6770862 | Maciuca et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6778267 | Drake | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6781688 | Kren et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6791680 | Rosengaus et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6798503 | Hiramoto et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6801358 | Shafer et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6806951 | Wack et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6816249 | Fairley et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6816251 | Swan et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6820349 | Peine | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6844927 | Stokowski et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6850321 | Yu | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6862142 | Lange | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6879390 | Kvamme et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6882415 | Watkins et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6888627 | Leslie et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6903338 | Mankos et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6906794 | Tsuji | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6919957 | Nikoonahad et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6922236 | Vaez-Iravani et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6937753 | O'Dell et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6946670 | Zurbrick | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6947588 | Sim | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6985220 | Chen et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6999183 | Nielsen et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7001055 | Lange | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7005671 | Yamazaki et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7009696 | Sullivan et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7012683 | Wolf et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7013222 | Strader | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7019717 | Yumoto et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7038771 | Smedt | May 2006 | B2 |
7038772 | Chen et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7038773 | Kuhlmann et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7046355 | Yu | May 2006 | B2 |
7068363 | Bevis et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7072034 | Rosengaus et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7075637 | Leslie et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7079237 | Woo et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7079238 | Vaez-Iravani et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7088443 | Vaez-Iravani et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7092082 | Dardzinski | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7126681 | Chen et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7130036 | Kuhlmann et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7130039 | Vaez-Iravani et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7136234 | Shafer et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7161667 | Meeks et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7161668 | Meeks et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7161669 | Velidandla et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7164475 | Fairley et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7199946 | Jeong | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7209227 | Smedt | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7218391 | Meeks | May 2007 | B2 |
7218392 | Biellak et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7227628 | Sullivan et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7227984 | Cavan | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7298940 | Abu-Ageel | Nov 2007 | B2 |
20030173525 | Seville | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20050122509 | Backhauss | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050226129 | Carr | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060245965 | Wienecke et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070035727 | Chen et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070067134 | Borowicz et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 001 460 | May 2000 | EP |
2000-136916 | May 2000 | JP |
2003-243465 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2006-294969 | Oct 2006 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080030731 A1 | Feb 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11417297 | May 2006 | US |
Child | 11891657 | US |