This application claims priority to European Patent Application No. 14176546.1 filed Jul. 10, 2014, the contents of which are hereby incorporated in its entirety.
The present invention relates to an axial swirler, in particular for premixing purposes in gas turbines, and it relates further to a burner for a combustion chamber with such an axial swirler. In particular it relates to axial swirlers for the introduction of at least one gaseous and/or liquid into a burner.
Swirlers are used as mixing devices in various technical applications. Optimization of swirlers aims at reducing the energy required to obtain a specified degree of homogeneity of a mixture. In continuous flow mixing the pressure drop over a mixing device is a measure for the required energy. Further, the time and space required to obtain the specified degree of homogeneity are important parameters for the evaluation of mixing devices or mixing elements. Swirlers are typically used for mixing of two or more continuous fluid streams. Axial swirlers are most commonly used as premixers in gas turbine combustors. A so-called swirl number sn characterizes the swirl strength of an axial swirler. The swirl number is defined as the ratio between the axial flux of azimuthal momentum and the axial flux of axial momentum multiplied by the swirler radius. The swirl number is an indication of the intensity of swirl in the annular flow induced by the swirler.
Swirl burners are devices that, by imparting sufficiently strong swirl to an air flow, lead to the formation of a central reverse flow region (CRZ) due to the vortex breakdown mechanism which can be used for the stabilization of flames in gas turbine combustors.
Targeting best fuel-air premixing and low pressure drop is often a challenge for this kind of devices. Good fuel-air premixing must be in fact achieved in a mixing region before the CRZ where the flame is stabilized. This implies the need in this mixing region of sufficiently high pressure losses, i.e. the use of a swirler with sufficiently high swirl number which allows the tangential shearing necessary to well premix fuel with air. High swirl number flows however give also origin to strong shearing at CRZ with too large and unnecessary pressure losses just in this region.
An improvement to the standard design of axial swirl burner has been proposed in U.S. 2012/0285173. This improvement consists in the introduction of a lobed trailing edge which can create small scale counter-rotating vortices embedded into the main vortex and able to enhance fuel-air mixing without significant effect on the swirl number of the main vortex. This solution, which has its origin in the application of lobes to non-swirling devices (disclosed in EP 2 522 912), allows to achieve improved fuel-air mixing also at low swirl numbers of the main swirling flow, with a benefit on pressure losses at the CRZ.
The use of these existing design concepts (standard and lobed swirlers) carries however several risks and disadvantages. In case of the lobed axial swirler, the main risk is flow separation at the trailing edge due to change in the exit flow angle taking place too late along the chord of the swirler. A second deficiency is given by the formation of rotating secondary flow structures in the swirler vanes which, carrying the fuel around, make rather challenging the control and optimization of fuel spatial distribution (spatial un-mixedness). In addition, the strong distortion along the trailing edge given by the lobed structure represents, on its own, a major manufacturing difficulty.
For all these reasons, there is a need for the new swirlers that could allow reduced pressure drop, robust flashback characteristics and improved NOx (due to better mixing), but also keep design relatively simple.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a highly effective swirler with a low pressure drop. As an application of such a swirler a burner comprising such a swirler is disclosed.
The above and other objects are achieved by an axial swirler for a gas turbine burner, comprising a plurality of swirl vanes with a streamline cross-section being arranged around a swirler axis and extending in radial direction between an inner radius (Rmin) and an outer radius (Rmax). The minimum radial distance Rmin is the distance from the swirler axis to the inner side or the inner lateral surface of the swirl vane. The maximum radial distance Rmax is the distance from the swirler axis to the outer side or the outer lateral surface of the swirl vane. Each swirl vane has a leading edge, a trailing edge, and a suction side and a pressure side extending each between said leading and trailing edges. Discharge flow angle (α) between a tangent to the swirl vane camber line at its trailing edge and the swirler axis is first function of radial distance (R) from the swirler axis, and a position of maximum camber of the swirl vane is second function of radial distance (R) from the swirler axis. At least for one swirl vane said first and second functions comprise each a respective local maximum and local minimum values along said radial distance from Rmin to Rmax. According to one embodiment, said first function of radial distance (R) from the swirler axis, and/or said second function of radial distance (R) from the swirler axis are periodic functions. A period of the said first function of radial distance (R) from the swirler axis, or/and said second function of radial distance (R) from the swirler axis is from 1 to 100 mm, preferably in the range 20-60 mm.
According to one embodiment, said first function of radial distance (R) from the swirler axis, and/or said second function of radial distance (R) from the swirler axis are sinusoidal functions.
According to another embodiment, said first function of radial distance (R) from the swirler axis, and/or said second function of radial distance (R) from the swirler axis are triangular or rectangular functions.
According to one embodiment, said first function of radial distance (R) from the swirler axis, and/or said second function of radial distance (R) from the swirler axis are the same function type. For example, they can both be sinusoidal.
According to yet another embodiment said first function of radial distance (R) from the swirler axis, and said second function of radial distance (R) from the swirler axis are substantially in phase along radial distance from Rmin to Rmax.
According to one embodiment, the first periodic function of radial distance (R) from the swirler axis is given by a function:
α0+Rbα*sin(2πNR)
where α0 is fixed angle, α* is maximum angle deviation, b and N are rational numbers.
According to another embodiment all the swirl vanes are identically formed and/or all the swirl vanes are arranged around the swirler axis in a circle.
According to yet another embodiment, the said first function of radial distance (R) from the swirler axis of two adjacent vanes are in phase or are out of phase inverted. If applied to a burner, the swirler as described above leads to a good mixing at low pressure drop but also to a high recirculation flow in a subsequent combustor.
The burner comprising an axial swirler as described above is characterized in that at least one of the swirl vanes is configured as an injection device with at least one fuel nozzle for introducing at least one fuel into the burner.
The burner can comprise one swirler or a plurality of swirlers. A burner with one swirler typically has a circular cross section. A burner comprising a plurality of swirlers can have any cross-section but is typically circular or rectangular. Typically a plurality of burners is arranged coaxially around the axis of a gas turbine. The burner cross-section is defined by a limiting wall, which for example forms a can-like burner.
In one embodiment the burner under full load injects fuel from the suction side or the pressure side of at least one, preferable of all swirl vanes.
In a particularly preferred embodiment, the fuel is injected on the suction side and the pressure side of each swirler vane, i.e. from both sides of the injecting swirl vane simultaneously.
Preferably the axial swirler and/or the burner described above is used in an annular combustor, a can combustors, or a single or reheat engines.
Further embodiments of the invention are laid down in the dependent claims.
Preferred embodiments of the invention are described in the following with reference to the drawings, which are for the purpose of illustrating the present preferred embodiments of the invention and not for the purpose of limiting the same. In the drawings,
For better understanding and appreciation of the embodiments of the present invention, first, design of standard and lobed axial swirler from prior art will be explained.
Design of a Standard Axial Swirler
We refer to a class of swirlers with exit flow angle (a) whose tangent is linearly increasing in radial direction from a minimum value αMIN at the minimum radius Rmin to a maximum value αMAX at the maximum radius RMAX. The radius is normalized with its maximum value, hence RMAX=1:
tan [α(R)]=K1 R+K2; with K1,K2 from αMIN and αMAX
The swirler blade 3 is characterized by a cross section at radius R defined by a given distribution of the camber line and of the blade thickness, for example, as given by NACA type airfoils as shown in
An additional condition is given by the tangent to the camber line at the leading edge aligned with the swirler axis. These two conditions determine a one-to-one relation between the distribution of Ω/L, the ratio between the azimuthal drop Ω from leading to trailing edge in a cylindrical coordinate system and swirler blade axial extension L, and the position of the maximum camber C at any given radius R.
This swirler is shown on the
Design of Lobed Swirler
The axial lobed swirler is usually obtained by superimposing a periodic deviation in the exit flow angle to the main one characterizing the standard axial swirler. The swirler map corresponding to this design is shown in
The deviation that is used here is given by:
Δα(R)=Rbα*sin(2πNlobesR)
where α* is the maximum deviation, Nlobes the number of lobes and where linear dependency from Rb is introduced to modulate the maximum deviation from the minimum to the maximum radiuses. Value of b between 0.3 and 3 are considered.
The design of such a swirler is achieved, by introducing this fluctuation more or less gradually along the airfoils (sometimes suddenly) starting from the position of the maximum camber of the standard axial swirler. Such a design concept leads to a swirler with a periodically lobed trailing edge as shown in
Design of the Swirler According to Invention
The design criteria given in the previous section for the lobed axial swirler implies a periodic fluctuation of the azimuthal drop Ω of the trailing edge. The design according to the embodiments of the invention, proposed here, consists in avoiding this fluctuation of the trailing edge by compensating with a fluctuation in the position of maximum camber C.
The necessary distribution of the position of the maximum camber C which gives a straight trailing edge is shown from the swirler map of
Above described embodiment shows an example where a discharge flow angle α between a tangent 26 to the swirl vane camber line 27 at its trailing edge 24 and the swirler axis 47 is sinusoidal function of a radial distance R from the swirler axis 47, and a position of maximum camber C 21 of the swirl vane is also sinusoidal function of a radial distance R from the swirler axis 47. This type of the function (sinusoidal) is not limiting. The invention covers any case wherein for at least one swirl vane 3 said first and second functions comprise each a respective local maximum and local minimum values along said radial distance from Rmin to Rmax. Local maximum and local minimum are generally defined as follows:
Definition of a local maxima: A function f(x) has a local maximum at x0 if and only if there exists some interval I containing x0 such that f(x0)>=f(x) for all x in I.
Definition of a local minima: A function f(x) has a local minimum at x0 if and only if there exists some interval I containing x0 such that f(x0)<=f(x) for all x in I.
The first derivative of function at local maximum or minimum is zero.
Other non-limiting examples of combinations for discharge flow angle α between a tangent 26 to the swirl vane camber line 27 at its trailing edge 24 and the swirler axis 47, and a position of maximum camber C 21 of the swirl vane as function of a radial distance R from the swirler axis 47 are presented in the dependent claims.
The burner comprising an axial swirler as described above is characterized in that at least one of the swirl vanes is configured as an injection device with at least one fuel nozzle for introducing at least one fuel into the burner.
The burner can comprise one swirler or a plurality of swirlers. A burner with one swirler typically has a circular cross section. A burner comprising a plurality of swirlers can have any cross-section but is typically circular or rectangular. Typically a plurality of burners is arranged coaxially around the axis of a gas turbine. The burner cross-section is defined by a limiting wall, which for example forms a can-like burner.
In one embodiment the burner under full load injects fuel from the suction side or the pressure side of at least one, preferable of all swirl vanes.
In a particularly preferred embodiment, the fuel is injected on the suction side and the pressure side of each swirler vane, i.e. from both sides of the injecting swirl vane simultaneously.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
14176546 | Jul 2014 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20100170255 | Zuo | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20120285173 | Poyyapakkam | Nov 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 394 471 | Mar 2004 | EP |
2 522 912 | Nov 2012 | EP |
2 685 164 | Jan 2014 | EP |
03102407 | Dec 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160010856 A1 | Jan 2016 | US |