Field
The present invention is generally related to an apparatus, system, and method for mixing and depositing a slurry mixture to form gypsum board.
Description of Related Art
Conventionally, in the art of making drywall, it is generally known to and blend foam into gypsum slurry. Generally, the mixture of materials are combined and swirled to create a vortex in a mixing device of a gypsum board making system. However, this vortex tends to act like a centrifuge (i.e., which is normally designed to separate materials). That is, since the foam and slurry are materials of different densities (relatively heavy gypsum slurry and relatively light weight foam), when these materials are mixed in such a manner and exposed to centrifuge-like conditions, the foam and slurry materials may separate. As such, it has been discovered that, at times, blending of the foam and slurry may be impeded, and thus the formation of a consistent, homogeneous mixture does not occur. Quality issues in the finished gypsum board then ensue, which may include, for example, blisters, blows, voids, poor core formation, uneven drying, and low finished product strengths.
It is an aspect of this disclosure to provide an apparatus for inducing turbulence into a slurry mixture for making gypsum board. The apparatus includes a funnel body having an inner wall, an outer wall, an inlet opening, and an outlet opening, and a plurality of baffles projecting from the inner wall towards a center of the funnel body. The plurality of baffles are spaced around the inner wall. The plurality of baffles are configured to induce turbulence into the slurry mixture poured into the inlet opening as the slurry mixture moves towards the outlet opening before exiting the outlet opening.
Another aspect provides a system for introducing a slurry mixture for making gypsum board. The system includes a mixer constructed and arranged to mix slurry to a first flow rate and direct the mixed slurry to an exit gate, a foam injector constructed and arranged to inject foam into the mixed slurry in the exit gate to form a slurry mixture, a canister constructed and arranged to induce a swirl to the slurry mixture, and a funnel body connected to the canister. The funnel body has an inner wall, an outer wall, an inlet for receiving the slurry mixture from the canister, an outlet, and a plurality of baffles projecting from the inner wall towards a center of the funnel body. The plurality of baffles are spaced around the inner wall. The plurality of baffles are configured to induce turbulence into the slurry mixture poured into the inlet from the canister as the slurry mixture moves towards the outlet before exiting the outlet for depositing onto paper to form the gypsum board.
Yet another aspect of this disclosure provides a method for mixing a slurry mixture for making gypsum board. The method utilizes a system including a mixer constructed and arranged to mix slurry to a first flow rate and direct the mixed slurry to an exit gate, a foam injector constructed and arranged to inject foam into the mixed slurry in the exit gate to form a slurry mixture, a canister constructed and arranged to induce a swirl to the slurry mixture; and a funnel body connected to the canister. The funnel body has an inner wall, an outer wall, an inlet for receiving the slurry mixture from the canister, an outlet, and a plurality of baffles projecting from the inner wall towards a center of the funnel body, the plurality of baffles being spaced around the inner wall and configured to induce turbulence into the slurry mixture poured into the inlet from the canister as the slurry mixture moves towards the outlet. The method includes: mixing slurry at the first flow rate; directing the mixed slurry to the exit gate; injecting foam into the mixed slurry in the exit gate to form the slurry mixture; inducing a swirl to the slurry mixture; inducing a swirl to the slurry mixture, and depositing the slurry mixture via the outlet of the funnel body onto paper to form the gypsum board.
Other aspects, features, and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, the accompanying drawings, and the appended claims.
As noted in the background, slurry and foam should be mixed together as homogenously as possible in order to produce a gypsum board (or plasterboard) product of high quality (i.e., a finished gypsum board product that lacks blisters, blows, voids, and poor core formation). In order to better blend the gypsum slurry and foam together in a more homogeneous fashion, this disclosure provides an apparatus, which may be sometimes referred to as a “baffled donut” herein, that is constructed and arranged to introduce a turbulence into the mixture as it passes through, as well as further mix the slurry mixture. As will become further evident by the description below, the apparatus disclosed herein acts as both a direction-changing device and mix-inducing device for the slurry mixture.
Throughout this disclosure, reference to a “slurry mixture” refers to a mixture of at least slurry and (aqueous) foam. That is, since the slurry is mixed before foam is injected therein, the term “slurry mixture” is used to clarify the product that is input into the disclosed baffled donut apparatus.
In the embodiment as shown in
The lower side 34 may include an angled wall that extends between the edge of the outlet opening 30 and an edge of the second outlet opening 35. However, this illustration is not intended to be limiting. The angled wall may assist in substantially reducing and/or eliminating any dead space and/or backup in the mixture or material as it is deposited from the outlet opening 30 and the second outlet opening 35.
In another embodiment, a lower side 34 and a second outlet opening 35 are not provided in the funnel body 12. That is, the inner wall 14 may extend between the inlet opening 15 at the top portion 18 of the body 12 and the outlet opening 30 at a bottom portion 20.
The funnel body 12 has an overall height DH. The outlet opening 30 may be provided at an outlet height OH measured from a top edge of the funnel body 12 to an edge of the outlet opening 30.
The top edge of the funnel body 12 has a top dimension DT. The inlet opening 15 has an opening dimension DT2. In an embodiment, the opening dimension DT2 of the inlet opening 15 is slightly smaller than the top dimension DT of the top edge. In an embodiment, the top dimension DT is approximately 7 inches (e.g. +/−5%). In an embodiment, the opening dimension DT2 is approximately 6.85 inches (e.g. +/−5%). In another embodiment, DT and DT2 may be equal. Of course, any dimensions noted above may be adjusted based on the system or apparatus being used, as well as the desired dimension of the outlet opening 30.
The bottom edge of the funnel body 12 has a bottom dimension DB. The second outlet opening 35 has an opening dimension DB2. In an embodiment, the opening dimension DB2 of the second outlet opening 35 is slightly smaller than the bottom dimension DB of the bottom edge. In an embodiment, the bottom dimension DB is approximately 7 inches (e.g. +/−5%). In an embodiment, the opening dimension DB2 is approximately 6.75 inches (e.g. +/−5%). In another embodiment, DB and DB2 may be equal. Of course, any dimensions noted above may be adjusted based on the system or apparatus being used, as well as relatively adjusted based on a desired dimension of the outlet opening 30 (discussed further below). In an embodiment, the size or diameter DB2 of the second outlet opening 35 may vary. The size of the second outlet opening 35 may variably depend on a line speed (speed or rate at which the mixed slurry is being delivered) and the type of product being mixed.
The inner wall 14 of the baffled donut apparatus 10 may be provided at an acute angle relative to a longitudinal axis Y that extend through a center of the outlet opening 30, for example. In an embodiment, the inner wall 14 has a slope of approximately 45 degrees (e.g. +/−5%) relative to the longitudinal axis Y. In another embodiment, as shown in
The inner wall 14 may also have a length L2 that extends between the top edge of the inlet opening 15 and an edge of the outlet opening 30, as shown in
The outlet opening 30 has an outlet diameter OD. In an embodiment, the size or diameter OD of the outlet opening 30 may vary from as little as approximately 1 inch (inclusive) (e.g. +/−5%) to as much as approximately 7 inches (inclusive) (e.g. +/−5%), or more. The size of the outlet opening 30 may variably depend on a line speed (speed or rate at which the mixed slurry is being delivered) and the type of product being mixed. In an embodiment, the outlet opening 30 may have a diameter OD in the range of approximately 3 inches (inclusive) (e.g. +/−5%) to approximately 7 inches (inclusive) (e.g. +/−5%).
The angled wall of the lower side 34 may be provided at an acute angle relative to a longitudinal axis Y that extends through a center of the outlet opening 30, for example. In an embodiment, the angled wall has a slope of approximately 45 degrees (e.g. +/−5%) relative to the longitudinal axis Y. In another embodiment, as shown in
In accordance with an embodiment, the angle A1 of the inner wall 14 may be larger or steeper than the angle A2 of walls of the lower side 34. Again, both angles A1 and A2 may vary based on any number of factors, including, but not limited to the size of the outlet opening 30 and/or the type of material being swirled, induced, and delivered, for example.
Other features may be provided on the funnel body 12, which are generally shown in the Figures. For example, the outer side wall of the body 12 may include a stepped configuration and/or grooves that assist in mounting and securing the baffled donut apparatus. As shown in
In addition to the above noted features, the baffled donut apparatus includes a number of baffles 22 projecting from the inner wall 14 towards a center of the funnel body 12. The baffles 22 are static devices that may aid in regulating the flow of the slurry mixture. The baffles 22 induce turbulence into the slurry mixture poured into the inlet opening 15 as the slurry mixture moves towards the outlet opening 30 (before exiting). It should be noted that the baffles 22 were eliminated from
As shown in
In an embodiment, the baffles 22 are spaced equidistantly relative to one another on and around the inner wall 14. In another embodiment, the baffles 22 are provided sporadically along the inner wall 14.
As shown in
The bottom side 36 may also run the length L of the baffle 22. The bottom side 36 includes a width W extending from the leading edge 24 to an end of the trailing edge 26, as shown in
The leading edge 24 of each baffle 22 may be provided at an angle D relative to a plane on the inner wall 14, as shown in
The trailing edge 26 is designed to induce as much turbulence as possible in the slurry mixture and simultaneously prevent build up from forming in the funnel body 12. The trailing edge 26 or side may include a curved or radiussed surface that extends from the leading edge towards the inner wall. In an embodiment, the radius R of the trailing edge 26 is within a range of approximately 5 degrees (e.g. +/−5%) to approximately 20 degrees (e.g. +/−5%). In one embodiment, the radius R of the trailing edge 26 is approximately 10 degrees (e.g. +/−5%). Alternatively, the trailing edge 26 may be an angled surface. For example, in an embodiment, the trailing edge of the baffle 22 is a relative 45 degrees (e.g. +/−5%). The trailing edge angle and/or radius prevents buildup from forming. In an embodiment, more radius may be provided on the trailing edge 26 for a side that includes a steeper angle (e.g., approximately 45 degrees (e.g. +/−5%)). In an embodiment, less or no radius may be for a shallower angle (e.g., approximately 25 degrees (e.g. +/−5%) or less).
In accordance with an embodiment, a shallower angle (e.g., approximately 25 degrees (e.g. +/−5%) or less) on the trailing edge, if possible, may be used for fewer baffles, e.g., for two or three baffles, provided around the funnel body 12. If several or more baffles are included, e.g., if four or more baffles are provided on the funnel body 12, then a steeper angle (e.g., approximately 45 degrees (e.g. +/−5%), or greater than 25 degrees (e.g. +/−5%)) may be used, in accordance with an embodiment, so as to not disturb the turbulence inducing effect of the vertical leading edge of the next baffle.
Each of the baffles 22 also has a first side 40 and a second side 42, as seem in
As illustrated in
The velocity of the moving, spinning slurry mixture stream is thus used by the static baffles 22 to create turbulence, agitation, and induce mixing and blending.
The system 100 including the baffled donut apparatus 10 enables production of a core structure with bigger bubbles, resulting in a finished product that has an improved or better core, by forcing coalescence of the bubbles in the slurry mixture.
Of course, it should be understood that the baffled donut apparatus 10 used in system 100 may be similar to the previously disclosed embodiments. That is, it includes a number of baffles 22 projecting from the inner wall 14 towards a center of the funnel body and spaced around the inner wall 14. The baffles 22 are configured to induce turbulence into the slurry mixture poured into the inlet from the canister 106 as the slurry mixture moves towards the outlet 30 to further swirl and mix the slurry mixture before it exits the outlet for depositing onto paper to form the gypsum board.
Accordingly, the system 100 slows, mixes, and redirects the discharge of slurry from a main mixer. Without this assembly, the slurry may likely exit the mixer at too high of a velocity to be controllable. The slurry would also be too high in elevation in relation to the paper for which it is deposited. Thus, the deposited slurry mixture may not be spread evenly across the paper. Such a combination of too high of a velocity and too sharp of an angle of deposit onto the paper generally results in great difficulties in forming gypsum board, let alone of product of high quality. The result (as seen in the prior art) may include poor edge formation, an inability to form a consistent board profile, and excessive voids (hollow areas) in the finished product. The end product would also have inconsistent density across the finished product, leading to inconsistent strength, poor drying in the kiln, and the need for excessive additives to try to compensate for the inconsistent formation and cross-profile density.
In addition to the gate/canister/donut assembly being used to slow and redirect the gypsum slurry onto the paper for formation, the assembly is also used to inject and entrain foam into the slurry. The movement of foam from being injected into the center of the main mixer and into the gate assembly has many proven advantages, among them being less soap usage, better core formation, easier drying, and higher quality finished product strength, which allows for lighter finished product weight. The baffled donut assembly 10 aids in optimizing this system design and optimizing the process and steps for injecting and mixing in such a manner.
In an embodiment, a mixer boot 108 is provided in the system 100 and receives the slurry mixture exiting from the outlet 30 of the baffled donut apparatus 10. The mixer boot 108 may deposit the slurry mixture onto (or in between) paper that is being conveyed by conveyor 100, to make the gypsum board.
As an example, the flow rate at which the slurry mixture is poured into the canister 106 may range from approximately 3500 lbs/min (e.g. +/−5%) to approximately −5200 lbs/min (e.g. +/−5%). The flow rate of the slurry mixture as it exits the outlet opening 30 of the baffled donut apparatus may range from approximately 3500 lbs/min (e.g. +/−5%) to approximately 5200 lbs/min (e.g. +/−5%).
Of course, it should be understood that the number of baffles 22 included along inner wall 14 is not intended to be limited to the illustrated embodiments. Although two baffles are shown, for example, in the Figures, a single baffle may be provided on the inner wall. Alternatively, three or more baffles may be positioned along the inner wall 14 of the funnel body 10.
Although the baffles 22 as disclosed herein are all similar in shape, size, and dimension, it should be noted that each baffle 22 provided on the inner wall 14 of the funnel body 12 need not all be similar in shape, size, and/or dimension. In an embodiment, the baffles 22 may be dimensioned to optimize for different line speeds, products, etc. For example, in accordance with an embodiment, multiple baffles 22 may be positioned around the inner wall 14 and include different lengths L (different lengths extending between the inlet 18 and the outlet 30 and that differ from the length L2 of the inner wall 14 and length L of another baffle). In an embodiment, one or more baffles 22 provided on the inner wall 14 may have differing width(s). For example, if a single baffle 22 is provided in the funnel body 10, the width W of the baffle may be designed to extend one-third of the way around the funnel (relative to the circumference, for example). In an embodiment, the heights H of leading edges 24 of any of the baffles 22 may vary. In another embodiment, the trailing edges 26 of one, some, or all of baffles 22 may include different curves or radiuses R. In addition or alternatively, the baffles may include different angles and/or different radiussed surfaces (e.g., 180 degrees). Baffles may also be of different shapes.
A donut apparatus having a configuration and construction as disclosed herein was manufactured and installed and tested in a mixing and gypsum board forming system, like system 100, to evaluate effectiveness of the disclosed donut apparatus on reducing blows and blisters in a finished gypsum product. The test was performed with an approximate 13 hour run. The settings were as follows:
Foam formulation settings: Normal
Foam Water: 120 lbs/msf
Foam Air: 20 lbs/msf
Soap: 0.69 lbs/msf
During testing, the system and product were observed during processing. In the system, it was initially observed that the output slurry mixture stream was smoother with minimal scalloping. Also, any movement of the mixer boot in the system was less than usual.
In particular, these results demonstrate the reduction in voids with the use of the baffled donut. The four hour window shown in the screenshot of
With regards to the product itself, its core structure appeared more pronounced and defined than usual, with a more defined bubble structure. In addition, no blisters were noticed after 5 hours of running the system with the baffled donut apparatus therein.
Accordingly, the baffled donut apparatus had a positive effect of eliminating voids in the final product.
To illustratively show the improvements in the finished gypsum board product, photographs were taken of a prior art product formed using a conventional system and a finished product formed during the example testing with the disclosed donut apparatus installed.
Based on this test, then, it was noted that very little to substantially zero blisters or blows were found on the final gypsum board products after the baffled donut apparatus was installed and utilized in production. Also, with the installation and use of the baffled donut apparatus, little to substantially zero build up was observed in the mixer boot. Further, the finished gypsum board product had a more distinct, open core as well as diminished voids.
Accordingly, it may be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that, based the description herein and the performed test, using a baffled donut apparatus such as apparatus 10 results in a more consistently mixed, homogenous slurry mixture (of foam and slurry). The turbulence and blending that is created by the baffles 22 in the apparatus 10 does not disrupt normal production of gypsum boards, or create new problems. Rather, it enhances the production process. The foam is blended in such a way that a cross-profile density of the finished gypsum board is more consistent. This allows for a finished board product that is more easily and consistently dried, which results in lower dryer temperatures and fuel savings. This also provides a finished product that has more desirable core attributes such as greater finished product strengths and a more consistent density and strength across its profile, resulting in a potentially lighter weight finished product. For example, there is less or substantially zero void formation and less blister formation in the finished gypsum board product.
In addition, more consistent blending of foam into the gypsum slurry, which results from utilizing the baffled donut apparatus 10, allows for fewer production related issues and improved production efficiencies. As previously noted above in the testing results, for example, the baffled donut apparatus 10 results in less slurry mixture build-up sticking to the inside of the mixer boot. Thus, less production stoppages resulting from lump formation are required, making the process more efficient. Additionally, with implementation of the disclosed baffled donut apparatus 10, there is less soap usage—and thus cost savings—from the ability to run lower density foam (30% improvement). That is, the herein disclosed baffled donut apparatus 10, and the turbulence it induces, results in better blending of foam and slurry, and allows use of more air to make foam without boot buildup, voids, and blisters. Using more air allows more foam volume with less soap needed to produce the foam, resulting in less costs. Thus, the disclosed apparatus 10 provides an overall ability to optimize the foam system and formulation to improve the characteristics of the finished product and reduce manufacturing costs. Finally, the controlled turbulence inside that is created by the baffled donut apparatus 10 creates a condition of “forced-coalescence” that allows for ideal conditions for the foam to blend with the gypsum slurry in such a way that highly desirable core bubbles are formed. This allows for further optimization of the foam and slurry formulations to further enhance the finished product and improve production efficiencies.
In addition, the design of the baffled donut apparatus 10 enables it to be manufactured for new production lines and systems, or retrofitted for an existing production line and system.
It should be understood, based on the disclosure above, that this disclosure further provides a method for mixing a slurry mixture for making gypsum board. The method as disclosed herein may utilize a system as shown in
The method of manufacturing and materials used to form the disclosed apparatus 10 are not intended to be limited. In an embodiment, the funnel body 12 may be formed from stainless steel and chrome plated or coated on at least the inner wall 14 and lower side 34 therein. The baffles may also include chromed stainless steel. In another embodiment, one or more parts of the apparatus 10 may be formed from plastic. For example, the funnel body 12 may be formed from plastic, while the baffles are made of steel.
Although not described in great detail herein, it should be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that the materials mixed and used in the system 100 and in which the baffled donut apparatus 10 induces flow are not intended to be limited. For example, the gypsum may be a calcined gypsum or hydrated calcium sulphate (e.g., semi-hydrate calcium sulphate, calcium sulfate hemihydrate or anhydrite, anhydrous calcium sulphate or anhydrite (type II or type III), or CaSO4.2(H20), CaSO4.0.5H20, or CaSO4) and is not limited to such. Accordingly, a calcined gypsum slurry may be mixed and flow induced therein. Further, it should be understood that reference to the “slurry mixture” is not limited to just slurry and foam, and that such a “slurry mixture” may also include products or additives to the mixture such as accelerators, retarders, fillers, binders, etc.
Also, the parts of the system 100 as illustrated are not intended to be limiting. Alternate and/or additional parts may be provided as part of system 100 that utilizes the baffled donut apparatus 10 as disclosed herein.
Further, although described herein as being used with a gypsum slurry to produce a gypsum board (or plasterboard) with a gypsum core covered with sheet(s) of paper, it should be understood that the herein disclosed apparatus may be provided in alternate systems or assemblies and/or may be used with other aqueous slurries or solutions, for example, that are mixed or poured and dispensed or output using an outlet to form other products, and thus are not just limited to systems for mixing and depositing gypsum slurry to form gypsum boards.
While the principles of the disclosure have been made clear in the illustrative embodiments set forth above, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications may be made to the structure, arrangement, proportion, elements, materials, and components used in the practice of the disclosure.
It will thus be seen that the features of this disclosure have been fully and effectively accomplished. It will be realized, however, that the foregoing preferred specific embodiments have been shown and described for the purpose of illustrating the functional and structural principles of this disclosure and are subject to change without departure from such principles. Therefore, this disclosure includes all modifications encompassed within the spirit and scope of the following claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/155,241, filed on Apr. 30, 2015. The content of this application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2985219 | Summerfield | May 1961 | A |
3343818 | Plemons et al. | Sep 1967 | A |
4450022 | Galer | May 1984 | A |
5643510 | Sucech | Jul 1997 | A |
5683635 | Sucech et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
6207055 | Satterfield et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6361201 | Russell et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6494609 | Wittbold | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6604849 | Lin et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6742922 | Shrader et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
7296919 | Petersen et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7311436 | Barker et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7524386 | George et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7654807 | Gannaway et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7690834 | Nakamura et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7718019 | Wittbold et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
8016960 | Wittbold et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8066421 | Sethuraman et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8322381 | Glanville | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8475762 | Li et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8685188 | Yamaji et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8834145 | Fahey | Sep 2014 | B2 |
9296124 | Rago et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9856168 | Ueno | Jan 2018 | B2 |
20030117891 | Wittbold | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20060045975 | Yamaji et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060244182 | Wittbold | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20080101150 | George | May 2008 | A1 |
20090122637 | Kruyer | May 2009 | A1 |
20100101682 | Barber | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110228630 | Gillis et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120167805 | Wittbold et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20140029372 | Roark, Jr. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20150231799 | Wittbold et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150315074 | Ueno et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150328607 | Wittbold et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Non-Final Office Action as issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/818,209, dated Jun. 11, 2019. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160317983 A1 | Nov 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62155241 | Apr 2015 | US |