This invention relates to balloon catheters.
The body includes various passageways such as arteries, other blood vessels, and other body lumens. These passageways sometimes become occluded by a tumor or restricted by plaque. To widen an occluded body vessel, balloon catheters can be used, for example, in angioplasty.
A balloon catheter can include an inflatable and deflatable balloon carried by a long and narrow catheter body. The balloon is initially folded around the catheter body to reduce the radial profile of the balloon catheter for easy insertion into the body.
During use, the folded balloon can be delivered to a target location in the vessel, e.g., a portion occluded by plaque, by threading the balloon catheter over a guide wire emplaced in the vessel. The balloon is then inflated, e.g., by introducing a fluid into the interior of the balloon. Inflating the balloon can radially expand the vessel so that the vessel can permit an increased rate of blood flow. After use, the balloon is deflated and withdrawn from the body.
In another technique, the balloon catheter can also be used to position a medical device, such as a stent or a stent-graft, to open and/or to reinforce a blocked passageway. For example, the stent can be delivered inside the body by a balloon catheter that supports the stent in a compacted or reduced-size form as the stent is transported to the target site. Upon reaching the site, the balloon can be inflated to deform and to fix the expanded stent at a predetermined position in contact with the lumen wall. The balloon can then be deflated, and the catheter withdrawn.
One common balloon catheter design includes a coaxial arrangement of an inner tube surrounded by an outer tube. The inner tube typically includes a lumen that can be used for delivering the device over a guide wire. Inflation fluid passes between the inner and outer tubes. An example of this design is described in Arney U.S. Pat. No. 5,047,045, the entire contents of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
In another common design, the catheter includes a body defining a guide wire lumen and an inflation lumen arranged side-by-side. Examples of this arrangement are described in Wang U.S. Pat. No. 5,195,969 the entire contents of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
In aspects, the invention features a balloon catheter including a tubular member that has a first proximal section and a second, distal section and a transition, the second section having a column strength less than a column strength of the first section and one or more of the features described herein.
In an aspect, the invention features a concentric balloon catheter, having a polymeric outer tubular member, including a balloon and a polymeric inner tubular member. The inner tubular member has a first, proximal section, a second more distal section, and a transition. The second section has a column strength and/or flexural modulus of about 75% or less than the column strength of the first section. The transition is located, e.g., about 1 to 10 cm, about 2 to 9 cm, about 4 to 8 cm from the distal end of the inner tubular member.
In another aspect, the invention features a concentric vascular angioplasty balloon catheter that includes an outer tubular member defining a lumen. A balloon is attached to the outer tubular member. The catheter also includes an inner tubular member comprising multiple layers located within the lumen of the outer tubular member. The inner tubular member has a first, proximal section welded to a second, more distal section to define a transition located proximal of the balloon. The inner tubular member has three or more layers in each of the first and second sections and the second section has a column strength less than a column strength of the first section.
In another aspect, the invention features a balloon catheter having a tubular member, a first lumen for delivery over a guidewire and a second lumen for communicating inflation fluid to the balloon. The tubular member also has a first proximal section, a second, distal section and a transition. The second section has a column strength, per unit length, less than the column strength, per unit length, of the first section and the transition is located about 1.0 cm or more from the distal end of the tubular member. The tubular member exhibits improved trackability, e.g. 10, 20, or 30 percent or more improved trackability, when compared to a monolithic tubular member having a column strength intermediate to the column strength of the first and second sections.
Embodiments may include one or more of the following. The transition is in the range of about 1 to about 10 cm (e.g., about 3 to about 8 cm, about 4 to about 7.5 cm, about 4 to about 7 cm) from the distal end of the inner tubular member. A distance measured from the transition to a distal end of the inner tubular member is no more than about 20 percent (e.g., no more than about 5 percent) of an overall length of the inner tubular member. The first section has a column strength, per 2.54 cm, of about 5 g to 20 g and the second section can have a column strength of about 2 to 7 g. The second section has a flexural modulus of about 75 percent or less (e.g., between about 20 and 40 percent) of a flexural modulus of a flexural modulus of the first section. The location of the transition is located proximal of the balloon. The balloon is between about 8 and 40 millimeters in length, the balloon has an inflated diameter of between about 1.5 and 10 millimeters, and/or the balloon includes polyethylene terethalate or nylon. The transition can also be located at a joint between the first and second tube sections. Trackability can be measured by push response, track force and/or input force.
Embodiments may also include one or more of the following. The transition includes a thickness variation of a first polymer and a second polymer. The transition includes a variation in diameter of the tubular member such as the first and second sections having different diameters. Where the first and second sections have different diameters, the sections can have the same polymer composition. The first and second sections of the catheter can also have different polymer compositions.
Embodiments may include one or more of the following. The catheter has at least one of the first and second sections include multiple layers, including an inner most layer. These multiple layers can include at least two layers (e.g., 3 or more layers). The outermost layers of the first and second sections are formed of different polymers and the other layers of the first and second sections are formed of the same polymer. The outermost layer of the first section is formed of nylon and/or the outermost layer of the second section is formed of polyether-block co-polyamide. The first and second sections can have the same innermost layer, e.g., formed of polyethylene. In other words, the inner most layer of the two sections can be the same material throughout. A second layer in both the proximal and distal sections can be elastomeric. The catheter can be a vascular angioplasty catheter. The first and second lumens of the catheter can be arranged side-by-side in a tubular body. The first and second lumens can be concentric. The outer tubular member is of a monolithic polymer construction, for example, formed of polyamide.
Embodiments may include one or more of the following advantages. A catheter having enhanced deliverability can be provided. The catheter can accommodate a gradual unfolding of a balloon, and hence a corresponding variation in stiffness near the distal end of the catheter, as the catheter is delivered into a tortuous lumen. The buckling strength of proximal and distal sections along the catheter length can be selected to provide sufficient pushability, so that the catheter can be urged distally from its proximal end, and sufficient trackability, so that the catheter can be guided along a tortuous path over a guide wire. The sections can be characterized by, for example, their column strength and/or flexural modulus. The sections can be tubes made of multiple polymer layers that provide advantages such as high collapse resistance and low friction lumen walls. The outer layer of the multi-layer structure can be a highly elastic polymer, such as an elastomer. The multilayer tubular member can have a substantially constant outer diameter along its length. Alternatively, the diameter can vary. The thickness of each of the layers can be selected to affect catheter performance.
The details of one or more embodiments of the invention are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims, including methods of manufacture and use.
Like reference symbols in the various drawings indicate like elements.
Referring to
The outer tube 12 extends from the proximal end to the balloon 8. A lumen 13 is defined between the inner tube 10 and the outer tube 12 through which inflation fluid can be delivered (arrows 14). The balloon 8 is attached at its proximal end to the outer tube 12 and at its distal end to the inner tube 10. Referring to
In embodiments, the distal portion of the catheter has a length of about, e.g., 60 to 140 cm. The balloon has an inflated diameter of about 1.5 to 10 mm, a length of about 8 to 40 mm and can include a relatively stiff, noncompliant material such as a biaxially oriented polymer, e.g. PET or nylon. The balloon can also be formed of compliant or semi-compliant materials such as PEBAX, available from Atofina, Philadelphia, Pa., as an example. The outer tube is a relatively stiff, burst-resistant polymer such as polyamide-12. Typically, the catheter inner tube has an overall length of about 25 cm to 140 cm, but can be longer or shorter depending on the application. For example, in coronary applications, the catheter typically has an overall length sufficient to be delivered femorally, via the femoral artery, or brachially, via the brachial artery. The catheter can also be delivered peripherally, for example, via the radial artery. For vascular applications, the length is typically about 135 to 140 cm. The catheter can be a rapid exchange type catheter in which the guidewire exits the guidewire lumen distal of the proximal portion 4.
Referring to
Referring also to
The catheter deliverability is enhanced by selecting in combination the relative buckling strength of the proximal and distal sections of the inner tube and the location of the transition between the sections. The buckling strength of the proximal and distal sections can be determined by measuring the column strength and/or flexural modulus of the sections. The position of the transition is measured from the distal end. The buckling strength differences and position of the transition are selected to balance the catheter pushability and trackability. Pushability is the capability to transmit to the distal end of the catheter an axial or rotational force imposed on the proximal end of the catheter. Trackability is the capability to pass a torturous passageway. Trackability is generally facilitated by a more flexible catheter but too much lateral flexibility can lead to problems such as buckling as the catheter is directed around a sharp curvature.
In a typical application, the performance requirements for deliverability become more severe as the catheter is urged more deeply into a vessel. Greater pushability is required since the distance between the more proximal portion, which is grasped by the physician, and the distal end increases. At the same time, in more remote portions of the vessel, the vessel diameter typically narrows and the vessel becomes more tortuous, thus greater trackability is also desirable.
In embodiments, the column strength and/or flexural modulus of the distal section is about 75% or less, e.g. 40%–20%, than the column strength and/or flexural modulus of the proximal section. The transition is located from the distal end at a position corresponding to about 20% or less, e.g. 10% or 5% or less, than the overall length of the tube. In embodiments, the column strength (measured per 2.54 cm length) of the proximal section is in the range of about 1 to 20 g, e.g., about 2 to 17 g. In embodiments, the column strength (measured per 2.54 cm length) of the distal section is in the range of about 2–7 g and the column strength of the proximal portion is in the range of about 9 to 16 g. In embodiments, the transition is about 1 to 10 cm, e.g., 1.5 to 9 cm, 3 to 8 cm, 4 to 7.5 cm, or 7 cm or less from the distal end of the catheter. The position of the transition can be varied depending on the length of the balloon. The transition is typically under or proximal of the balloon. For a longer balloon, the transition position is generally further from the distal end of the catheter. The transition is typically not so far proximal of the balloon that the unwrapped balloon does not influence the stiffness of substantially the length of the distal section. For example, the transition is typically within about 5 cm or 2 cm or less of the most proximal inflated portion of the balloon. (The most proximal inflated portion is distal of the region where the balloon is attached to the catheter.) In addition, the location of the transition can be selected such that the transition does not substantially extend beyond an introducer. A catheter and introducer can be provided as a kit such that the transition permits a range of catheter extensions without the transition extending beyond the introducer.
Referring particularly to
The outer layers 40, 46 of the inner tube can be selected to balance pushability and trackability. The outer layer 40 in the proximal section is typically a stiffer material than the outer layer 46 of the distal section 16. The layers 40, 46 meet at a transition 56 at a position, P, from the distal end of the tube. In embodiments, the flexural modulus of the layer 46 is about 75% or less than the flexural modulus of the layer 40. In embodiments, the flexural modulus of the layer 46 is about 15 to 500 MPa and the flexural modulus of the layer 40 is about 700 to 4000 MPa. Suitable polymers include elastomers, such as thermoplastic elastomers. Examples include nylons such as nylon 12. In a particular example, the proximal outer layer 40 is a blend of 60% TR55LX amorphous polyamide 12 available from EMS, Switzerland (flexural modulus of 2000 MPa) and 40% L20 polyamide 12 also available from EMS, Switzerland (flexural modulus of 1100 MPa). The flexural modulus of the blend is about 1600 MPa. The distal outer layer 46 is a blend of 75% Pebax 7033 available from Atofina, Philadelphia, Pa. (flexural modulus of 465 MPa) and 25% Pebax 5533 available from Atofina, Philadelphia, Pa. (flexural modulus of 201 MPa). The flexural modulus of the blend is about 400 MPa. The tube can be manufactured by separately coextruding tube elements for the proximal and distal portions, cutting the tube elements to desired lengths, and bonding the tube elements by comelting with a laser.
Referring to
The outer layer is composed of two sublayers 73, 75. In the proximal section, the layer 73 is relatively thin and the layer 75 is relatively thick. In the distal section, layer 73 is relatively thin and the layer 75 is relatively thick. The column strength or flexural modulus of the materials in layers 73, 75, the relative thickness of the layers, and the transition 72 can be varied. For example, in the example illustrated, the material in layer 73 may have a greater flexural modulus than the material in layer 75. In this arrangement, the transition 72 has a transition length tL over which the thickness of sublayers 73, 75 varies. The flexibility in the transition varies. The transition position, P, is measured from the distal end of the tube to the middle of the transition length tL. In embodiments in which a variation in relative thickness of the sublayers extends to the distal end, the transition length is measured at the middle of the transition. The tube can be made by coextrusion. Coextrusion is described in WO 01/32398A1, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Referring now to
Column Strength and Flexural Modulus Measurements
Column strength can be measured by investigating load before buckling. Referring to
Push Strength and Track Force
Referring to
A suitable path 124 is defined in a tube element made of Teflon™, which has an inner diameter of 0.074 inch, and a wall thickness of 0.006 inch. The path has an overall length of about 13.25 inch. The path has a first straight leg 125 of 11.25 inch, a 1.5 inch diameter semicircular bend 128 and a second straight leg 130 of 0.5 inch. A 0.014 inch diameter guide wire is positioned in the path. A tortuous path 124 mimics the path found in the coronary arteries. Entrance of a test sample into the tortuous path 124 simulates the exiting of the distal end of the catheter from the introducer into the path defined by the exposed artery (see
Tube Data
Referring to Table I, column strength and push response data for several tube samples is provided.
In Samples 1 and 2, proximal and distal inner tube sections are formed by coextrusion. The tubes are extruded with an inner diameter equal to about 0.017 inches and an outer diameter equal to about 0.022 inches. The proportional thickness for each of the three layers is 0.8:0.4:1 for the inside, middle and cover layers, respectively. In both the proximal and distal sections, the inside layer is PE (Marlex 4903) and the middle layer is Plexar PX-380. The proximal section (Sample 1) of the outer layer is a pellet mixed blend of 60% TR55LX amorphous polyamide 12 and 40% L20 polyamide 12. The distal section of the outer layer is a pellet mixed blend of 75% Pebax 7033 and 25% Pebax 5533. After forming the proximal and distal three-layer sections, each is tested to determine their respective column strengths. As the table indicates, the column strength of the distal section (Sample 2) was about 35% of the column strength of the proximal section (Sample 1).
In Sample 3, a two section tube is prepared by laser welding squared ends of the proximal and distal sections described in Samples 1 and 2 to form a bi-component inner tube. (As used herein, “bi-component” refers to an inner tube having a transition as described above. The term “monolithic” refers to an inner tube having no transition (e.g., an inner tube of constant coextrusion).) The end of the distal section is then trimmed to a length of 5 cm (this distance being the transition position P measured from the distal end). As the table indicates, the bi-component tube in Sample 3 has a push response of about 23 g/cm. In Sample 4, the tube structure is the same as in Sample 3 but the transition is at 7 cm. The push response is about 19 g/cm.
In Sample 5, an inner tube is formed by constant coextrusion with no transition (i.e., the inner tube is monolithic). The outer layer of the tube is Pebax 7233 and the middle layer and inside layer are Plexar PX-380 and Marlex 4903, respectively. The column strength is 5.7 g, intermediate between the proximal and distal portions in Samples 1 and 2. In Sample 5, the push strength is 19 g/cm, which is about 18% less than the push strength of Sample 3. Thus, bi-component Sample 3 exhibits an improved push strength relative to monolithic Sample 5.
In Samples 6–8, tubes having varying dimensions are investigated. In Sample 6, a monolithic tube component is extruded to have three layers. The outer layer is L20 polyamide 12 and the inside and middle layers are Marlex 4903 and Plexar PX-380, respectively. Sample 7 is also a monolithic tube component formed of an outer layer of L20 polyamide 12, a middle layer of Plexar PX-380 and an inside layer of Marlex 4903. Each of the layers of the Samples 6 and 7 are of constant wall thickness, but the outer diameter of Sample 7 is less than the outer diameter of Sample 6. Sample 6 has an outer diameter of 0.0235 inch and Sample 7 has an outer diameter of 0.021 inch. The column strength of Sample 6 is 8.4 g and the column strength of Sample 7 is 5.9 g.
Sample 8 combines Samples 6 and 7 by tapering the outer layer of L20 polyamide 12, from the proximal outer diameter of 0.0235 inch to a smaller distal diameter of 0.021 inch a position (P) 5 cm from the distal end. The outer layer diameter is tapered by varying the puller speed during coextrusion. The inner tubular member is tested as outlined above. As the data indicates, Sample 8 exhibits a push response of about 24 g/cm.
Referring now to Table II, track work data is provided for a series of coaxial catheters using inner tubes of different designs.
To obtain comparative track, the inner tube designs were combined with an outer tube and balloon of common design to provide a catheter assembly. The outer tube included a hypotube of stainless steel that has a length of about 40 inches, an inner diameter of about 0.019 inch and an outer diameter of about 0.023 inch. Laser welded to the distal end of the hypotube is a second tubular section. The second tubular section is made of Pebax 72D, which extends about 15 inches and has an outer diameter of about 0.032 inch and has an inner diameter of about 0.026 inch. The balloon is attached at the distal end at the second tubular section.
Monolithic Sample 1 is a catheter assembly including an inner tube that is a monolithic, three layer extrusion including Pebax 7233 as the outer layer, Marlex 4903 as the middle layer and Plexar PX-380 as the inside layer.
Bi-Component Sample 1 includes an inner tube that has three layers and proximal and distal sections. The proximal section has an inside layer of PE (Marlex 4903), a middle layer of Plexar PX-380 and a outer layer (proximal outer) of a pellet mixed blend of 60% TR55LX amorphous polyamide 12 and 40% L20 polyamide 12. The distal section includes an inside layer of PE (Marlex 4903), a middle layer of Plexar PX-380 and a outer layer (distal outer) of a pellet mixed blend of 75% Pebax 7033 and 25% Pebax 5533. The proximal and distal sections are joined by welding.
Bi-Component Sample 2 has three layers and a proximal and distal section. Inside and middle layers are formed of Marlex 4903 and Plexar PX-380, respectively. The outer layer in the proximal section (proximal outer) is Pebax 7233. The outer layer in the distal section is Pebax 63D.
Bi-Component Sample 3 has three layers and a proximal and distal section. Inside and middle layers are formed of Marlex 4903 and Plexar PX-380, respectively. The outer layer in the proximal section (proximal outer) is Pebax 7233. The outer layer in the distal section is Pebax 66D. The transition region of each of the three bi-component samples is located 7 cm from the distal end.
As the data indicates, the bi-component samples required substantially less work, and hence improved trackability compared to the monolithic samples. In addition, Bi-component Sample 1, which corresponds to Sample 4 in Table I, illustrates improved trackability while maintaining push response of certain monolithic samples, translating to improved deliverability.
Referring now to
Referring now to Table III, data for catheter assemblies with bi-component samples having inner tubes having different transition locations is provided.
The inner tube has proximal and distal sections composed as described above in Bi-Component Sample 1 of Table II. Sample A has a transition location 7 cm from the distal end, Sample B has a 2.5 cm transition location and Sample C has a 1 cm transition location. As the data indicates, Sample A, having a 7 cm transition location, required substantially less input work to traverse the test path compared to bi-component samples having 1 cm and 2.5 cm transition locations.
Referring as well to
Other Embodiments
Referring to
Referring to
In further embodiments, the catheter body is a rapid-exchange type catheter body which includes a pathway for the guide wire to exit at a location distal to the proximal end and proximal of the balloon. In further embodiments, the balloon catheter can be arranged for use in non-vascular applications such as the esophagus, the gastrointestinal tract, or the urinary tract.
This application claims the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/450,255, filed Feb. 26, 2003.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3733309 | Wyeth et al. | May 1973 | A |
| 3745150 | Corsover | Jul 1973 | A |
| 3769984 | Muench | Nov 1973 | A |
| 3771527 | Ruisi | Nov 1973 | A |
| 3799172 | Szpur | Mar 1974 | A |
| 3807408 | Summers | Apr 1974 | A |
| 3814137 | Martinez | Jun 1974 | A |
| 3833004 | Vazquez et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
| 3837347 | Tower | Sep 1974 | A |
| 3861972 | Glover et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
| 3889685 | Miller, Jr. et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
| 3924634 | Taylor et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
| 3959426 | Seefluth | May 1976 | A |
| 3962519 | Rusch et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
| 3996938 | Clark, III | Dec 1976 | A |
| 4035534 | Nyberg | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4047868 | Kudo et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
| 4061707 | Nohtomi et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
| 4079850 | Suzuki et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
| 4085757 | Pevsner | Apr 1978 | A |
| 4105022 | Antoshkiw et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4140126 | Choudhury | Feb 1979 | A |
| 4141364 | Schultze | Feb 1979 | A |
| 4195637 | Gruntzig et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
| 4198981 | Sinnreich | Apr 1980 | A |
| 4213461 | Pevsner | Jul 1980 | A |
| 4222384 | Birtwell | Sep 1980 | A |
| 4233022 | Brady et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4250072 | Flynn | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4581390 | Flynn | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4597755 | Samson et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4627436 | Leckrone | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4627844 | Schmitt | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4636346 | Gold et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4637396 | Cook | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4748982 | Horzewski et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4776846 | Wells | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4782834 | Maguire et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4842590 | Tanabe et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4917667 | Jackson | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4921483 | Wijay et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4976690 | Solar et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 5047045 | Arney et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5094799 | Takashige et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5100381 | Burns | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5100721 | Akao | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5100992 | Cohn et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5102416 | Rock | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5108415 | Pinchuk et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5108420 | Marks | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5114423 | Kasprzyk et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5116318 | Hillstead | May 1992 | A |
| 5125913 | Quackenbush | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5137512 | Burns et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5147302 | Euteneuer et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5156857 | Wang et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5160321 | Sahota | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5163949 | Bonutti | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5171221 | Samson | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5176697 | Hasson et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5179174 | Elton | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5183613 | Edwards | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5188593 | Martin | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5195969 | Wang et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5195970 | Gahara | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5195972 | Inoue | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5201706 | Noguchi et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5209728 | Kraus et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5209729 | Hofmann et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5223205 | Jackowski et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5226880 | Martin | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5248305 | Zdrahala | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5250069 | Nobuyoshi et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5254090 | Lombardi et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5254091 | Aliahmad et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5254107 | Soltesz | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5263962 | Johnson et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5270086 | Hamlin | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5272012 | Opolski | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5277199 | DuBois et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5279560 | Morrill et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5279594 | Jackson | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5279596 | Castaneda et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5290306 | Trotta et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5304171 | Gregory et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5304197 | Pinchuk et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5306246 | Sahatjian et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5312356 | Engelson et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5318041 | DuBois et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5318587 | Davey | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5330428 | Wang et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5330429 | Noguchi et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5334146 | Ozasa | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5336205 | Zenzen et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5342307 | Euteneuer et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5344401 | Radisch et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5358486 | Saab | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5358493 | Schweich, Jr. et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5364357 | Aase | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5366472 | Hillstead | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5370655 | Burns | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5372603 | Acker et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5413559 | Sirhan et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5425712 | Goodin | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5441484 | Atkinson et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5445624 | Jimenez | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5447497 | Sogard et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5470322 | Horzewski et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5480383 | Bagaoisan et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5499973 | Saab | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5499980 | Euteneuer | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5507995 | Schweich, Jr. et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5509899 | Fan et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5509910 | Lunn | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5531719 | Takahashi | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5533985 | Wang | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5544121 | Dosaka et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5569218 | Berg | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5622665 | Wang | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5649909 | Cornelius | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5658263 | Dang et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5676659 | McGurk | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5700252 | Klingenstein | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5728063 | Preissman et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5728067 | Enger | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5749849 | Engelson | May 1998 | A |
| 5755690 | Saab | May 1998 | A |
| 5759173 | Preissman et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5759191 | Barbere | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5772641 | Wilson | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5775327 | Randolph et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5800391 | Kontos | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5836925 | Soltesz | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5851203 | van Muiden | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5868704 | Campbell et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5868706 | Cox | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5951929 | Wilson | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5971975 | Mills et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5980505 | Wilson | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5980530 | Willard et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5984907 | McGee et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6004289 | Saab | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6021340 | Randolph et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6030369 | Engelson et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6036677 | Javier, Jr. et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6039743 | Quiachon et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6045547 | Ren et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6059769 | Lunn et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6066114 | Goodin et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6068634 | Lorentzen Cornelius et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6086556 | Hamilton et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6093177 | Javier, Jr. et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6103037 | Wilson | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6106485 | McMahon | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6106510 | Lunn et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6129708 | Enger | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6132824 | Hamlin | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6135992 | Wang | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6136258 | Wang et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6139525 | Davis-Lemessy et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6168588 | Wilson | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6179856 | Barbere | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6195969 | Yilmaz | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6197015 | Wilson | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6200290 | Burgmeier | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6217565 | Cohen | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6234995 | Peacock, III | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6240231 | Ferrera et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6273879 | Keith et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6299596 | Ding | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6319228 | Kastenhofer | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6319244 | Suresh et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6328731 | Ouchi | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6355027 | Le et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6406457 | Wang et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6443925 | Schaible et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6465067 | Wang et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6482348 | Wang et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6503223 | Sekido et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6503353 | Peterson et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6517548 | Lorentzen Cornelius et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6527789 | Lau et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6530938 | Lee et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6562021 | Derbin et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6575934 | Duchamp | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6579277 | Rabiner et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6589226 | Owens | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6648024 | Wang | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6663614 | Carter | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6702802 | Hancock et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6706010 | Miki et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6726714 | DiCaprio et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6793634 | White et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6887219 | Wantink | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6942648 | Schaible et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6960188 | Jörgensen | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 20010021840 | Suresh et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20020077654 | Javier, Jr. et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020081406 | Wang et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020156459 | Ye et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020156460 | Ye et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20030009129 | Miller et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030083691 | Wantink | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030093059 | Griffin et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030100849 | Jang | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030105426 | Jorgensen | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030139759 | Schaible et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20040054323 | Wantink | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040065979 | Wang | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040116901 | Appling | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040210210 | Quint | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040210211 | Devens, Jr. et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040225279 | Raymond | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040236310 | Chin et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040243102 | Berg et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050148997 | Valley et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2347024 | Nov 1995 | CA |
| WO0045885 | Aug 2000 | WO |
| WO0132398 | May 2001 | WO |
| WO0143944 | Jun 2001 | WO |
| WO0236194 | May 2002 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20040210211 A1 | Oct 2004 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60450255 | Feb 2003 | US |