This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(b) to UK Application No. 1511200.6, filed 25 Jun. 2015 and entitled “STEERABLE ANTENNA SYSTEM”, and to UK Application No. 1514938.8, filed 21 Aug. 2015 and entitled “BEARING CALCULATION”. Both applications are incorporated by reference herein.
The present technique relates to the field of data processing and more particularly the calculation of bearings.
It is known to use global navigation system signals in order to determine the location of a device capable of receiving such signals. For example, such navigation systems signals include GPS (The Global Positioning System), GLONASS (The Russian Global Navigation Satellite System), the planned European Union Galileo positioning system, India's Indian Regional Navigation Satellite System and the Chinese BeiDou Navigation Satellite System as well as ground-based navigation system signals such as is used in A-GPS (assisted-GPS). These systems typically provide an absolute location of the receiving device. For example, a GPS receiver can translate received GPS signals into longitudes and latitudes.
Such navigation systems, although highly precise, are often slightly inaccurate. For example, a GPS signal may provide a location that is several metres away from the correct location.
Additionally, although such systems typically provide a location of the receiver, it would be desirable to be able to use these systems to produce an absolute bearing, e.g. a bearing relative to true north or true east (90 degrees clockwise of true north). Knowledge of an absolute bearing can be particularly useful in communications systems. For example, knowing the absolute bearing of a directional antenna may have make it possible to estimate which devices are likely to receive a transmission.
Viewed from a first example configuration, there is provided an apparatus comprising: a location receiver to receive a signal indicative of a location of the location receiver; a movement mechanism to rotate the location receiver about an axis and to provide an angle of the location receiver about the axis from a known point; and calculation circuitry to produce an output value indicative of an absolute bearing of the known point about the axis, based on a plurality of given angles of the location receiver about the axis from the known point, and a plurality of associated locations of the location receiver indicated by the signal received when the location receiver is at each of the given angles.
Viewed from a second example configuration, there is provided a method comprising the steps: receiving a signal indicative of a location of the location receiver; rotating the location receiver about an axis; providing an angle of the location receiver about the axis from a known point; and producing an output value indicative of an absolute bearing of the known point about the axis, based on a plurality of given angles of the location receiver about the axis from the known point, and a plurality of associated locations of the location receiver indicated by the signal received when the location receiver is at each of the given angles.
Viewed from a third example configuration, there is provided An apparatus comprising: means for receiving a signal indicative of a location of the location receiver; means for rotating the location receiver about an axis; means for providing an angle of the location receiver about the axis from a known point; and means for producing an output value indicative of an absolute bearing of the known point about the axis, based on a plurality of given angles of the location receiver about the axis from the known point, and a plurality of associated locations of the location receiver indicated by the signal received when the location receiver is at each of the given angles.
The present technique will be described further, by way of example only, with reference to embodiments thereof as illustrated in the accompanying drawings, in which:
Before discussing the embodiments with reference to the accompanying figures, the following description of embodiments and associated advantages is provided.
In accordance with one example configuration there is provided an apparatus comprising: a location receiver to receive a signal indicative of a location of the location receiver; a movement mechanism to rotate the location receiver about an axis and to provide an angle of the location receiver about the axis from a known point; and calculation circuitry to produce an output value indicative of an absolute bearing of the known point about the axis, based on a plurality of given angles of the location receiver about the axis from the known point, and a plurality of associated locations of the location receiver indicated by the signal received when the location receiver is at each of the given angles.
In accordance with the above, a location receiver is rotated (e.g. in a circle) about an axis. At two or more angles (measured in radians) of the location receiver about the axis from the known point (e.g. at two or more angular displacements from the known point), a reading is taken from the location receiver in order to arrive at an angle/reading pair. The calculation circuitry uses two or more of these pairs in order to determine an absolute bearing of the known point. By determining the absolute bearing in this manner, it is possible to compensate for inaccuracy in the location signal while determining the absolute bearing of the known point, which can be used to establish how the apparatus is oriented.
In some embodiments, the apparatus further comprises: a noise filter, wherein the signal indicative of the location of the location receiver comprises a noise component; and the noise filter is to filter out the noise component. The filter may be used to remove a noise component from the received signal that is used to determine a location of the receiver. For example, the filter may be a low-pass filter. The filter can be used to further increase the accuracy of the absolute bearing determined by the calculation circuitry. The noise filter may be implemented at a variety of different points within the apparatus.
Although the calculation circuitry may have a number of different components, in some embodiments, the calculation circuitry comprises: a correlator to correlate the angle of the location receiver about the axis from a known point and output a correlation result; and a phase angle extractor to produce the output value from the correlation result.
In some embodiments, the correlator comprises: a multiplier to multiply the location of the location receiver by e−jφ, where j is the unit imaginary number and φ is the angle of the location receiver about the axis from the known point with which the location is associated, and to output a plurality of multiplication results; and an integrate and dump filter to operate on the plurality of multiplication results. The correlator in these embodiments considers an angle/reading pair (the reading taken at a particular angle from the known point about the axis). The particular angle is denoted by φ. A particular reading is multiplied by the conjugate, i.e. e−jφ, where j is the unit imaginary number (often referred to as i, or √(−1)). This produces a single multiplication result. By providing multiple angle/reading pairs, a plurality of multiplication results are produced. These are provided to an integrate and dump filter. The integrate and dump filter may, for example, average the provided values and accordingly, eliminate or reduce any noise component inherent in the location value obtained from the location receiver. The result from the integrate and dump filter is the output value and this is indicative of an absolute bearing of the known point about the axis.
The absolute bearing may be represented in a number of different ways. For example, in some embodiments, the absolute bearing of the known point about the axis is a bearing of the known point about the axis relative to true east. The term “true east” is used here to refer to 90 degrees clockwise from true north. For example, true east can be thought of as being along the line of zero latitude. In other embodiments, the absolute bearing may be a bearing relative to true north.
The received signal may be indicative of a location of the location receiver in a number of different ways. For example, in some embodiments, the signal is indicative of a longitude and latitude of the location receiver.
In some embodiments, the signal is a navigation system signal. For example, the signal may be a satellite based global navigation system signal that allows a receiver to estimate or determine its location based on the time taken for signals to travel from one or more satellites to the receiver. These timings may then be used to narrow down the possible locations of the receiver, for example, into an average or expected longitude and latitude. An example of such a satellite based global navigation system signal is a GPS signal. Other systems may include GLONASS (The Russian Global Navigation Satellite System), the planned European Union Galileo positioning system, India's Indian Regional Navigation Satellite System and the Chinese BeiDou Navigation Satellite System.
In some embodiments, the apparatus receives a further signal indicative of a location of the location receiver; and the further signal is a ground based global navigation system signal. Such systems may be used in order to further refine or aid the determination of the location of the location receiver. For example, assisted-GPS (A-GPS) is a ground-based system that can be used to improve the startup performance of a GPS receiver in order for a location receiver to determine its location more quickly.
In some embodiments, the apparatus further comprises: an antenna assembly to perform at least one of receiving or transmitting a further signal, wherein the antenna assembly defines a reference plane; the movement mechanism is to rotate the antenna assembly about the axis; the location receiver is directly or indirectly mounted to the antenna assembly at a distance from the axis equal to the radius such that when the movement mechanism rotates the antenna assembly about the axis, the location receiver rotates about the axis. In such embodiments, the location receiver is directly or indirectly mounted on the antenna assembly such that as the antenna assembly rotates, the location receiver rotates as well. Accordingly, once the absolute bearing of the known point has been determined, since the rotation of the location receiver/antenna assembly around the known point at the axis is known, it is possible to determine the absolute bearing of a reference plane of the antenna assembly. This can be useful where the antenna assembly prominently transmits or receives in a particular direction, in order to help orient the antenna assembly in order to improve reception and/or transmission.
In some embodiments, the apparatus further comprises: an antenna bearing calculation unit to determine an indication of an absolute bearing of the reference plane based on an absolute bearing of the known point about the axis, an angle of the location receiver about the axis from a known point and a position at which the location receiver is directly or indirectly mounted to the antenna assembly. The antenna bearing calculation unit may be used to determine the absolute bearing of the reference plane at a particular time.
There are a number of ways of representing an indication of the absolute bearing of the reference plane. However, in some embodiments, the indication of the absolute bearing of the reference plane is a vector perpendicular to the reference plane.
In some embodiments, the axis is perpendicular to the reference plane; and the axis passes through a mid-point of the antenna assembly. In this manner, the antenna assembly may rotate on the spot. For example, the orientation of the rotation assembly changes without changing the position of the assembly. Conversely, the location receiver continues to rotate at a radius, thereby altering its position as it rotates.
In some embodiments, the axis is upright. For example, the axis may be substantially perpendicular to the plane of the ground.
In some embodiments, the calculation circuitry is to produce the output value and a further output value indicative of a tilt of the location receiver, additionally based on a radius between the location receiver and the axis. The tilt of the location receiver may be defined as, for example, the angle between the horizontal plane (e.g. the plane tangent to the Earth's surface at the location of the apparatus) and the plane formed by the rotation of the location receiver about the axis. Calculating both the tilt and the absolute bearing can be achieved by additionally considering the radius between the location receiver and the axis (in addition to the plurality of given angles of the location receiver about the axis from the known point and the plurality of associated locations of the location receiver indicated by the signal received when the location receiver is at each of the given angles).
There are a number of ways in which the tilt can be determined. In some embodiments, the calculation circuitry comprises cost minimising circuitry to calculate the output value and further output value by performing a cost minimising function. For example, the cost minimising function can be based on a least squares estimate of the output value and the further output value. For example, given a cost function C(absolute bearing, tilt), the cost minimising function may use a least squares estimate in order to seek the absolute bearing and tilt values that best fit the received location data from the location receiver.
In some other embodiments, the calculation circuitry comprises: a correlator to correlate the angle of the location receiver about the axis from a known point and output a correlation result; a phase angle extractor to produce the output value from the correlation result; and a tilt estimator to produce the further output value based on a magnitude of the correlation result.
Particular embodiments will now be described with reference to the figures.
The location receiver 110 may be made to rotate about an axis 130 using a movement mechanism. The location receiver rotates at a radius r from the axis 130. In this embodiment, the location receiver 110 is directly attached to the movement mechanism 120 itself, which rotates about the axis 130. The location receiver 110 is therefore capable of clockwise or anticlockwise movement about axis 130. The location receiver 110 makes an angle with a known point 140 and the movement mechanism 120 is able to determine this angle. In
Although the above apparatus describes the use of a GPS signal, the location receiver 110 may also use other satellite based systems. For example, the location receiver 110 may operating using a GLONASS (The Russian Global Navigation Satellite System) signal. The apparatus may alternatively use a ground-based navigation signal, or may use such a signal in addition to a satellite based system in order to assist the operation of or refine the estimate produced by, a satellite based system.
Pk=rej(θ+φ
Where r is the radius that the location receiver 110 makes with the axis 130, j is the unit imaginary number (i.e. √(−1)), θ is the absolute bearing of the known point 140 about the axis 130, φk is the bearing of the location receiver 110 from the known point 140 about the axis 130 at reading k, and nk is the noise component at reading k. This equation represents a conversion of a location reading into polar form. It also recognises that the location of the location receiver about the axis 130 is a function of absolute bearing of the known point 140 and the angle that the location receiver makes with the axis 130 and the known point 140.
The multiplier 210 multiplies Pk by the conjugate e−j(φ
Pk×e−j(φ
Accordingly, the result of the multiplication is a function of θ, i.e. the absolute bearing of the known point 140 about the axis 130 and a modified noise component nke−j(φ
In this embodiment, the multiplication result passes through a low pass filter 220. This filter is strictly optional and in other embodiments, the multiplication result may pass directly to the integrate and dump filter 230. In this embodiment, the low-pass filter performs a filtering process such that the noise component is reduced.
In any event, the multiplication result or filtered multiplication result passes to the integrate and dump filter 230. This determines a total sum (T) of all readings in order to provide an average value. The averaging performed by the integrate and dump filter 230 has the effect of reducing or eliminating the noise component, thereby producing the value rej(θ). From this, an angle estimation {circumflex over (θ)} is produced using a phase angle extractor 250.
In this embodiment, the angle estimate corresponds with the absolute bearing of the known point 140 relative to true east. In other words, an angle estimate of 0 means that the bearing of the known point about the axis 130 points true east (where true east is π/2 radians clockwise of true north, along a line of 0 latitude).
The process starts at step 305 and at step 310, the variables N, A, and M are set to the desired values as specified above. At step 315, the quality of the GPS measurements is evaluated and, if necessary, the values of N, A, and M are changed. For example, if the GPS signal is particularly poor then the values of N, A, and M are altered so that more readings are taken. At step 320, the location receiver is rotated counter clockwise until a mechanical end stop is reached. In other words, the location receiver is rotated counter clockwise as far as it will go. Once this end point is reached, the orientation of the location receiver 110 at this position is assigned an angle. In this embodiment, the assigned angle is −188 degrees because at the position of the mechanical stop, the location receiver 110 will be −188 degrees from the known point about the axis 130. Note that the mechanical stop may be in another position, provided the position is known in advance. At step 325, the antenna is then rotated by 8 degrees until it is at an angle of −180 degrees from the known point. At step 330, the variable n (the current rotation number) is initialised to 0. At step 335, it is determined whether or not n (the current rotation number) is less than N (the number of rotations to be performed). If not, then at step 340, the readings can be used to calculate the bearing offset, and the process completes at step 345. Alternative, if n is not less than N then at step 350, n is incremented by 1. The value a (the current angle of rotation) is initialised to −180 degrees at step 355. At step 360, it is determined whether or not a (the current angle of rotation) is greater than 180 degrees. This represents the situation in which the location receiver has completed an entire rotation from −180 degrees to 180 degrees. If this is the case, then the process returns to step 335. Otherwise, the process proceeds to step 365 where m (the number of readings taken at this position) is initialised to 0. At step 370, m is incremented by one. At step 375, the longitude and latitude are determined from the GPS signal received by the location receiver 110. At step 380, it is determined whether or not m (the number of readings taken at this position) is less than M (the number of readings to take at each position). If so, then the process returns to step 370 where the value of m is incremented and another reading is taken. If not, then the process proceeds to step 385 where the value of a (the current angle of rotation) is incremented by the scanning resolution (A). At step 390, the location receiver 110 is rotated by A degrees and flow proceeds to step 360.
In effect, the flowchart shown in
Using a similar methodology to that described above, it is possible to determine both the absolute bearing of a known point 140 and also the tilt of the location receiver relative to the plane tangent to the Earth's surface at the location of the location receiver 110. The different angles involved can be seen with reference to
There are a number of ways of determining both θ0 and θ1. In one embodiment, cost minimising circuitry may be used to perform a cost minimising function based on θ0 and θ1. For example, consider the following quadratic cost function:
Where k is the number of readings, Pk is location reading number k (as previously discussed), j is the unit imaginary number (√(−1)), φk is the angle made by the location receiver 110 about the axis 130 at reading k and xk(θ1)=r[cos(φk)+j sin(φk)cos(θ1)] denotes the trajectory of the ellipse. The aim is to minimise C(θ0,θ1) with respect to θ0 and θ1. In other words, this method seeks to compute the absolute bearing and tilt estimates that best fit the received location data.
Minimizing C(θ0,θ1) with respect to θ0 yields:
Where ∠z denotes the angle of the complex number z and * refers to the complex conjugate. In other words, xk*(θ1)=r[cos(φk)−j sin(φk)cos(θ1)]. In the above equation, it can be seen that {circumflex over (θ)}0 is a function of θ1. Substituting {circumflex over (θ)}0(θ1) into C(θ0,θ1) yields:
The least squared tilt estimate {circumflex over (θ)}1 is evaluated by firstly finding the minimum of C({circumflex over (θ)}0(θ1),θ1) and then the least square estimate of the absolute bearing angle {circumflex over (θ)}0 is derived via back substitution. Accordingly, the value of θ1 for which C({circumflex over (θ)}0(θ1),θ1) attains its minimum (arg min) is computed by:
And the least squared estimate of θ0 is given by:
Another way to determine both the absolute bearing and tilt is schematically illustrated by the calculation circuitry 400 shown in
Assuming that φk is sampled uniformly in a circle then by performing trigonometric and algebraic manipulation, it can be shown that:
Where n again represents a noise component. The bearing and tilt estimates are therefore given by:
This method may be less computationally expensive than using the previously described cost minimising circuitry.
In the present application, the words “configured to . . . ” are used to mean that an element of an apparatus has a configuration able to carry out the defined operation. In this context, a “configuration” means an arrangement or manner of interconnection of hardware or software. For example, the apparatus may have dedicated hardware which provides the defined operation, or a processor or other processing device may be programmed to perform the function. “Configured to” does not imply that the apparatus element needs to be changed in any way in order to provide the defined operation.
Although illustrative embodiments of the invention have been described in detail herein with reference to the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to those precise embodiments, and that various changes, additions and modifications can be effected therein by one skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention as defined by the appended claims. For example, various combinations of the features of the dependent claims could be made with the features of the independent claims without departing from the scope of the present invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1511200.6 | Jun 2015 | GB | national |
1514938.8 | Aug 2015 | GB | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3789415 | Vickland | Jan 1974 | A |
3844341 | Bimshas, Jr. et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
4436190 | Wentzell | Mar 1984 | A |
4599620 | Evans | Jul 1986 | A |
4633256 | Chadwick | Dec 1986 | A |
4959653 | Ganz | Sep 1990 | A |
5049891 | Ettinger et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5125008 | Trawick et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5357259 | Nosal | Oct 1994 | A |
6124832 | Jeon et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6404385 | Croq et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6448930 | Judd | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6486832 | Abramov et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6522898 | Kohno et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6621454 | Reudink et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6784830 | Lawrence | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6934511 | Lovinggood et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6963747 | Elliott | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7062294 | Rogard et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7403748 | Keskitalo et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7515916 | Alexander | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7593693 | Kasapi et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7664534 | Johnson | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7697626 | Wang et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
8340580 | Epstein | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8509724 | D'Amico et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8577416 | Nandagopalan et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8630267 | Jin | Jan 2014 | B1 |
9173064 | Spain, Jr. | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9179360 | Vivanco | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9692124 | Caimi et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9698891 | Larsson | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9706419 | Bozier et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9924385 | Lysejko et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9973943 | Lysejko et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
20020042274 | Ades | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020142779 | Goto et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020159409 | Wolfe et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030195017 | Chen et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030228857 | Maeki | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040043745 | Najarian | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040077354 | Jason et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040106436 | Ochi et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040204850 | MacNeille | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040233103 | Toshev | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040242274 | Corbett et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050048921 | Chung | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050063340 | Hoffmann et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050157684 | Ylitalo et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050192037 | Nanda et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050285784 | Chiang et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060072518 | Pan et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060292991 | Abramov et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20080005121 | Lam et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080123589 | Lee et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080287068 | Etemad | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090005121 | Wong et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090032223 | Zimmerman et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090046638 | Rappaport et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090067333 | Ergen et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090086864 | Komninakis et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090103492 | Altshuller et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090116444 | Wang et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090207077 | Hwang et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090252088 | Rao et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090274076 | Muharemovic et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090310554 | Sun et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100071049 | Bahr et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100130150 | D'Amico et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100216477 | Ryan | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100240380 | Yim et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110003554 | Sekiya | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110163905 | Denis et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110235569 | Huang et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110244808 | Shiotsuki et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110312269 | Judd et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120002598 | Seo et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120015659 | Kalyani et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120046026 | Chande et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120119951 | Vollath | May 2012 | A1 |
20120252453 | Nagaraja et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120299765 | Huang et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120329511 | Keisu | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130041549 | Reeve | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130203401 | Ryan et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130215844 | Seol et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140256376 | Weissman et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140313080 | Smith et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150065164 | Hoseinitabatabaei | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150078191 | Jongren et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20160037550 | Barabell et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160255667 | Schwartz | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160262045 | Yang et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160277087 | Jo et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160377695 | Lysejko et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160380353 | Lysejko et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160380354 | Bozier et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160380355 | Lysejko et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160380363 | Logothetis | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160381570 | Lysejko et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160381574 | Dudzinski et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160381585 | Dudzinski et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160381590 | Lysejko et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160381591 | Lysejko et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160381698 | Grinshpun et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170111181 | Zhou | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170280314 | Yang et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1284794 | Feb 2001 | CN |
104635203 | May 2015 | CN |
0654915 | May 1995 | EP |
1903348 | Mar 2008 | EP |
2113145 | Nov 2009 | EP |
2207267 | Jul 2010 | EP |
2391157 | Nov 2011 | EP |
2448144 | May 2012 | EP |
2506625 | Oct 2012 | EP |
2538712 | Dec 2012 | EP |
2318914 | May 1998 | GB |
2484377 | Apr 2012 | GB |
H05188128 | Jul 1993 | JP |
H06188802 | Jul 1994 | JP |
101346062 | Dec 2013 | KR |
9426001 | Nov 1994 | WO |
199965105 | Dec 1999 | WO |
0152447 | Jul 2001 | WO |
0231908 | Apr 2002 | WO |
03096560 | Nov 2003 | WO |
2004095764 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2004114546 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2005064967 | Jul 2005 | WO |
2007010274 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2007069809 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2008064696 | Jun 2008 | WO |
2008111882 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2008151057 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2010077790 | Jul 2010 | WO |
2011044947 | Apr 2011 | WO |
2011060058 | May 2011 | WO |
2014106539 | Jul 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 15/186,134 dated Mar. 14, 2017, 8 pages. |
U.S. Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 15/182,209 dated Apr. 13, 2017, 17 pages. |
Doi et al., “Low-Cost Antenna Array Via Antenna Switching for High Resolution 2-D DOA Estimation,” SIPS 2013 Proc. IEEE, Oct. 16, 2013, pp. 83-88. |
Jung et al., “Attitude Sensing Using a GPS Antenna on a Turntable: Experimental Tests,” NAVIGATION, J. of the Institute of Navigation, Fairfax, VA, US, vol. 51, No. 3, Dec. 1, 2004, pp. 221-230. |
PCT Search Report from PCT/GB2016/051234 (corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 15/187,570), dated Aug. 5, 2016, 13 pgs. |
PCT Search Report from PCT/GB2016/051360 (corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 15/187,900), dated Aug. 19, 2016, 12 pgs. |
PCT Search Report from PCT/GB2016/051615 (corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 15/187,515), dated Aug. 12, 2016, 13 pgs. |
PCT Search Report from PCT/GB2016/051617 (corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 15/187,616), dated Aug. 23, 2016, 11 pgs. |
PCT Search Report from PCT/GB2016/051618 (corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 15/187,602), dated Aug. 12, 2016, 12 pgs. |
PCT Search Report from PCT/GB2016/051759 (corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 15/187,680), dated Sep. 14, 2016, 15 pgs. |
PCT Written Opinion from PCT/GB2016/051195, dated May 17, 2017, 5 pgs. |
PCT Written Opinion from PCT/GB2016/051205, dated May 16, 2017, 5 pgs. |
PCT Written Opinion from PCT/GB2016/051234, dated May 17, 2017, 10 pgs. |
PCT Written Opinion from PCT/GB2016/051285, dated May 10, 2017, 5 pgs. |
PCT Written Opinion from PCT/GB2016/051360, dated Jun. 1, 2017, 6 pgs. |
PCT Written Opinion from PCT/GB2016/051428, dated Jun. 2, 2017, 12 pgs. |
PCT Written Opinion from PCT/GB2016/051615, dated May 17, 2017, 5 pgs. |
PCT Written Opinion from PCT/GB2016/051759, dated May 18, 2017, 6 pgs. |
Office Action in related Case U.S. Appl. No. 15/186,134 dated Nov. 22, 2016, 18 pages. |
PCT Search Report from PCT/GB2016/051428 (corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 15/187,188), dated Dec. 13, 2016, 19 pgs. |
Office Action in related Case U.S. Appl. No. 15/187,574 dated May 15, 2018, 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/187,570—Office Action dated Feb. 27, 2018, 16 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/187,602—Office Action dated Feb. 22, 2018, 19 pages. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 15/187,515 dated May 4, 2018, 8 pages. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 15/187,616 dated Jan. 9, 2018, 12 pages. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 15/187,680 dated May 21, 2018, 8 pages. |
U.S. Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 15/187,574 dated Dec. 15, 2017, 14 pages. |
UK Search Report from GB 1514938.8, dated Apr. 18, 2016, 4 pgs. |
UK Search Report from GB 1516901.4, dated Mar. 18, 2016, 5 pgs. |
UK Search Report from GB 1518654.7, dated Mar. 24, 2016, 3 pgs. |
UK Search Report from GB 1519216.4, dated Apr. 15, 2016, 5 pgs. |
UK Search Report from GB 1519220.6, dated Apr. 4, 2016, 4 pgs. |
UK Search Report from GB 1519228.9, dated Apr. 29, 2016, 4 pgs. |
UK Search Report from GB 1519270.1, dated Apr. 25, 2016, 5 pgs. |
UK Search Report from GB 1519272.7, dated Jun. 10, 2016, 3 pgs. |
UK Search Report from GB 1519273.5, dated Apr. 27, 2016, 3 pgs. |
PCT Search Report from PCT/GB2016/051195, dated Jul. 25, 2016, 13 pgs. |
PCT Search Report from PCT/GB2016/051205, dated Jul. 25, 2016, 13 pgs. |
Office Action in related Case U.S. Appl. No. 15/187,680 dated Nov. 3, 2017, 8 pages. |
PCT Search Report from PCT/GB2016/051285, dated Jul. 13, 2016, 12 pgs. |
UK Search Report from GB 1519237.0, dated Jun. 10 Apr. 2016, 3 pgs. |
Office Action in related Case U.S. Appl. No. 15/187,515 dated Dec. 7, 2017, 9 pages. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 15/182,209 dated Nov. 22, 2017, 13 pages. |
U.S. Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 15/187,574 dated Dec. 15, 2017, 14 pages. |
U.S. Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 15/187,570 dated Jun. 7, 2019, 17 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160377695 A1 | Dec 2016 | US |