The invention is based on a bistable solenoid valve for a hydraulic braking system according to the definition of the species of independent patent claim 1. The subject matter of the present invention is also a hydraulic braking system for a vehicle having at least one such bistable solenoid valve.
Known hydraulic vehicle braking systems comprise a muscle-power-actuatable master cylinder, to which wheel brake cylinders of wheel brakes are hydraulically connected. The connection of the wheel brake cylinders is typically via a hydraulic unit, which comprises solenoid valves, hydraulic pumps, and hydraulic accumulators and enables a wheel-individual brake pressure regulation. Such brake pressure regulations enable the implementation of various safety systems, for example, antilock braking systems (ABS), electronic stability programs (ESP), etc., and the execution of various safety functions, for example, an antilock braking function, an anti-slip regulation (ASR), etc. Control and/or regulating procedures in the antilock braking system (ABS) or in the anti-slip regulation system (ASR system) or in the electronic stability program system (ESP system) for the pressure buildup or pressure dissipation in the corresponding wheel brakes can be carried out via the hydraulic unit. To carry out the control and/or regulating procedures, the hydraulic unit comprises solenoid valves, which can usually be held in unique positions as a result of the opposing forces “magnetic force”, “spring force”, and “hydraulic force”.
Moreover, designing hydraulic vehicle braking systems as power braking systems is known from the prior art, i.e., providing them with an external energy supply unit, which provides the energy required for service braking. The external energy supply unit typically comprises a hydraulic pressure accumulator, which is charged using a hydraulic pump. The muscle power exerted by the driver supplies a target value for the level of the braking force. An actuation of the vehicle braking system by the muscle power of the vehicle driver is only performed in an emergency mode as so-called auxiliary braking in the event of failure of the external energy supply unit. Assisted braking systems are also known, in which a part of the energy required for the brake actuation originates from an external energy supply unit and the other part originates from the muscle power of the vehicle driver. Both the power braking systems and also the assisted braking systems do not require a brake booster.
A hydraulic vehicle braking system having a muscle-power-actuatable master cylinder, to which wheel brake cylinders of wheel brakes are hydraulically connected, and having a hydraulic pressure source as an external energy supply unit, with which hydraulic pressure can be applied to the wheel brake cylinders for brake actuation, is known from DE 10 2008 001 013 A1. In this case, a pressure chamber of the master cylinder is connected via a decoupling valve to a brake fluid storage container, so that the pressure chamber can be switched to be depressurized. A brake actuation is performed as power braking using the external energy supply unit. Moreover, a hydraulic pedal travel simulator is integrated into the master cylinder, which is switchable to be depressurized via a simulator valve.
A bistable solenoid valve of the type in question is known from DE 33 05 833 A1, which comprises an exciter coil and an armature, which plunges therein and consists of permanent-magnetic material, is polarized in its movement direction, and forms a valve part. A magnetic field conducting body protrudes like a core into the exciter coil and fills up a part of the length of the exciter coil. A further magnetic field conducting body is arranged adjacent to the end of the exciter coil into which the armature plunges and is formed in the form of a ring disk, which encloses the armature with a spacing. If the exciter coil is deenergized, forces act between these magnetic field conducting bodies and the armature which move the armature into catch positions or at least fix it therein, and thus ensure stable switch positions of the solenoid valve. There is no requirement for a spring, which can move the valve part into a predetermined catch position, in this solenoid valve.
The bistable solenoid valve for a hydraulic braking system having the features of independent patent claim 1 has the advantage that in a solenoid valve having a deenergized first operating state, a further deenergized second operating state can be implemented. This means that embodiments of the present invention provide a bistable solenoid valve which can be switched over between the two operating states by applying a switchover signal, wherein the solenoid valve remains permanently in the respective operating state until the next switchover signal. In this case, the first operating state can correspond to a closed position of the solenoid valve and the second operating state can correspond to an open position of the solenoid valve. The change between the two operating states can be carried out, for example, by briefly energizing the active actuator of the magnet assembly and/or by applying a switchover signal or current pulse to the magnet assembly. Using such brief energizing, the power consumption can advantageously be reduced in comparison to a conventional solenoid valve having two operating states, which only comprises one deenergized first operating state and has to be energized for the duration of the second operating state to implement the energized second operating state. Alternatively, the solenoid valve can be switched over from the open position into the closed position by briefly energizing the magnet assembly and then switched over from the closed position into the open position when a retaining pressure in the solenoid valve falls below a predetermined pressure threshold value.
A lighter valve armature than in the case of the conventional embodiment as a steel part can be provided by the embodiment as a plastic component. Moreover, the magnet receptacle and any arbitrary number of equalizing grooves can be integrated easily into the valve armature. The lighter valve armature and the permanent magnet arranged in the valve armature enable a reduction of the switching energy which has to be applied to switch the bistable solenoid valve between its states. The magnet assembly can thus be implemented having a shorter coil winding, so that the winding body and the housing jacket and also the guide sleeve and the valve armature can also be shortened and the complete installation space of the solenoid valve can be reduced. Due to the reduced installation length in the axial direction, more structural space is advantageously available for other assemblies and safety functions in the vehicle.
Embodiments of the present invention provide a bistable solenoid valve for a hydraulic braking system, having a magnet assembly and a guide sleeve, in which a pole core is arranged fixedly and a valve armature having a permanent magnet, which is polarized in its movement direction, is arranged axially displaceably. The magnet assembly is pushed onto the pole core and the guide sleeve. The pole core forms an axial stop for the valve armature. The valve armature is drivable by a magnetic force generated by the magnet assembly or by a magnetic force of the permanent magnet and pushes a closing element into a valve seat during a closing movement and raises the closing element off the valve seat during an opening movement. In this case, the valve armature is embodied as a plastic component and the permanent magnet is embedded or installed in a magnet receptacle on a first end face of the valve armature facing toward the pole core.
Moreover, a hydraulic braking system for a vehicle is proposed, having a hydraulic unit and multiple wheel brakes. The hydraulic unit comprises at least one brake circuit, which comprises at least one solenoid valve and carries out a wheel-individual brake pressure regulation. In this case, the at least one brake circuit comprises at least one bistable solenoid valve.
Embodiments of the bistable solenoid valve according to the invention can be used for normally open and for normally closed functions. The energizing of the magnet assembly can advantageously be briefly reversed in polarity via switches in the corresponding control unit. This opens up potential savings in a hydraulic braking system by unifying the valve types used and reducing the variety of variations of valve types in the construction kit for the hydraulic unit. In general and independently of the embodiment of the braking system, the use of a bistable solenoid valve instead of a permanently energized solenoid valve provides savings potential by reducing the electric power consumption. Moreover, the vehicle electrical system is relieved and the CO2 emissions are reduced by the brief energizing of the magnet assembly. Furthermore, costly heating concepts in the electronic control unit of the braking system can be omitted. Moreover, fewer and/or smaller heatsinks, fewer heat resistant materials, and smaller spacings between the components in the control unit are possible, so that further structural space can advantageously be saved.
Advantageous improvements of the device specified in independent patent claim 1 and the method specified in independent patent claim 1 are possible by way of the measures and refinements set forth in the dependent claims.
It is particularly advantageous that the valve armature comprises at least two equalizing grooves and at least two ribs, which are each arranged between two adjacent equalizing grooves and partially enclose the permanent magnet. In this case, an end of the individual ribs partially enclosing the permanent magnet can be embodied in each case as a cover, in which the permanent magnet is embedded. Alternatively, an end of the individual ribs partially enclosing the permanent magnet can be embodied in each case as a catch hook, which can be locked with the permanent magnet. Moreover, the catch hooks can each comprise an insertion bevel, via which the permanent magnet can be installed. In one preferred embodiment, the valve armature comprises four equalizing grooves and four ribs, so that even at low temperatures, a rapid pressure equalization is possible in the air gap between the pole core and the valve armature and the switching time can be reduced. A cavity then also results between valve armature and pole core due to the covers and/or catch hooks formed between the pole core and the permanent magnet, when the valve armature presses against the pole core via the covers and/or catch hooks. A faster pressure equalization in the air gap between valve armature and pole core is enabled by this cavity between the valve armature and the pole core and the equalizing grooves, since a direct fluid connection is provided between the axial grooves of the armature and the end face of the armature or permanent magnet. An improvement of the closing time, in particular at low temperatures, can thus advantageously be achieved, by the so-called “hydraulic sticking” between the pole core and armature being reduced by the fluid connection, and also a buildup of a closing fluidic counterforce on the first end face of the armature being promoted by rapid propagation of the fluid. An additional contour is thus not required on the pole core to avoid the hydraulic sticking of the valve armature on the pole core and to effectuate better closing behavior and thus better closing dynamics at low temperatures. The hydraulic sticking results in particular due to adhesion forces, which act between smooth surfaces of the pole core and the first end face of the armature or the permanent magnet pressing against one another.
In a further advantageous embodiment of the bistable solenoid valve, the permanent magnet can be retained on the pole core in a deenergized open position of the solenoid valve, so that an air gap between pole core and valve armature is minimal and the closing element is raised off the valve seat.
In a further advantageous embodiment of the bistable solenoid valve, the magnet assembly can be energized using a first current direction during the closing movement, which generates a first magnetic field, which has the effect that the pole core repels the permanent magnet having the valve armature, so that the air gap between the valve armature and the pole core is enlarged and the closing element is pushed into the valve seat.
In a further advantageous embodiment of the bistable solenoid valve, a restoring spring can be arranged between the pole core and the valve armature. A spring force of the restoring spring can advantageously assist the closing movement. Moreover, in a deenergized closed position of the solenoid valve, a pressure confined in the solenoid valve and/or the restoring spring can hold the closing element in the valve seat to form a seal. Furthermore, the permanent magnet can move the valve armature in the direction of the pole core during the opening movement, so that the air gap between the valve armature and the pole core is reduced in size and the closing element is raised off the valve seat when the pressure confined in the solenoid valve falls below a pre-determinable limiting value. The effective spring force can be predetermined via the properties of the restoring spring so that the solenoid valve remains independent of the confined pressure in the closed position and the effective magnetic force of the permanent magnet is equalized. In an embodiment without restoring spring, a pressure limiting value can be predetermined via the properties of the permanent magnet and the resulting magnetic force, and if the pressure confined in the solenoid valve falls below this pressure limiting value, the valve armature moves from the closed position into the open position. Alternatively, the resulting magnetic force of the permanent magnet can be predetermined as sufficiently small that the valve armature with the closing element remains in the closed position independently of the confined pressure.
In a further advantageous embodiment of the bistable solenoid valve, the magnet assembly can be energized using a second current direction during the opening movement, which generates a second magnetic field, which causes the pole core and the permanent magnet having the valve armature to be attracted to one another, so that the air gap between the valve armature and the pole core is reduced in size and the closing element is raised off the valve seat. In this embodiment, the properties of the permanent magnet are selected so that the magnetic force of the permanent magnet is less than the active closing force, which the confined pressure and/or the restoring force generate.
In a further advantageous embodiment of the bistable solenoid valve, the permanent magnet can be arranged inside the magnet assembly independently of the armature stroke. The permanent magnet is thus always in the area of effect of the magnetic field generated by the magnet assembly upon energizing of the magnet assembly and can thus advantageously have smaller dimensions.
In an advantageous embodiment of the hydraulic braking system, the at least one bistable solenoid valve can release a brake pressure regulation in at least one associated wheel brake in the deenergized open position and can confine a present brake pressure in the at least one associated wheel brake in the deenergized closed position. An additional function can thus be implemented on a usually provided hydraulic unit having ESP functionality with little additional expenditure, which can electrohydraulically confine a present brake pressure in the corresponding wheel brake and retain it with little power consumption over a longer timeframe. This means that the existing pressure supply, the pipelines from the hydraulic unit to the wheel brakes, and sensor and communication signals can be used not only for the ESP function and/or ABS function and/or ASR function, but rather also for an electrohydraulic pressure retention function in the wheel brakes. Costs, structural space, weight, and wiring can thus advantageously be saved with the positive effect that the complexity of the braking system is reduced.
In a further advantageous embodiment of the hydraulic braking system, the at least one brake circuit can comprise a fluid pump, a suction valve, which connects a suction line of the fluid pump to a muscle-power-actuated master cylinder during a brake pressure regulation and disconnects the suction line of the fluid pump from the muscle-power-actuated master cylinder in the normal mode, and a switchover valve, which connects the muscle-power-actuated master cylinder to at least one associated wheel brake in the normal mode and retains the system pressure in the brake circuit during a brake pressure regulation. In this case, the switchover valve and/or the suction valve can be embodied as a bistable solenoid valve.
In an alternative embodiment of the hydraulic braking system, the at least one brake circuit can comprise a hydraulic pressure generator, the pressure of which is settable via a servo motor, a simulator valve, which connects a pedal simulator to a muscle-power-actuated master cylinder in the normal mode, and disconnects the pedal simulator from the master cylinder in the emergency mode and during a brake pressure regulation, a brake circuit disconnecting valve, which connects the muscle-power-actuated master cylinder to at least one associated wheel brake in the emergency mode and disconnects the muscle-power-actuated master cylinder from the at least one associated wheel brake in the normal mode and during a brake pressure regulation, and a pressure switching valve, which connects the hydraulic pressure generator to the at least one associated wheel brake in the normal mode and during a brake pressure regulation and disconnects the hydraulic pressure generator from the at least one associated wheel brake in the emergency mode. In this case, the simulator valve and/or the brake circuit disconnecting valve and/or the pressure switching valve can be embodied as a bistable solenoid valve.
Exemplary embodiments of the invention are illustrated in the drawing and are explained in greater detail in the following description. In the drawing, identical reference signs identify components or elements which execute identical or similar functions.
As is apparent from
As is furthermore apparent from
As is furthermore apparent from
As is furthermore apparent from
A cavity then also results between valve armature 40A, 40B, 40C and pole core 11 due to the covers 45A, 45B or catch hooks 45C formed between the pole core 11 and the permanent magnet 18 when the valve armature 40A, 40B, 40C presses against the pole core 11 in the open position via the covers 45A, 45B or the catch hooks 45C. Due to this cavity between the valve armature 11 and the pole core 11 and the equalizing grooves 42A, 42B, 42C, a faster pressure equalization is enabled in the air gap 12 between valve armature 40A, 40B, 40C and pole core 11, since a direct fluid connection is provided between the equalizing grooves 42A, 42B, 42C of the valve armature 40A, 40B, 40C and the end face of the valve armature 40A, 40B, 40C or the permanent magnet 18, respectively. An improvement of the closing time, in particular at low temperatures, can thus advantageously be achieved, by the so-called “hydraulic sticking” between the pole core 11 and the valve armature 40A, 40B, 40C being reduced by the fluid connection, and also a buildup of a closing fluidic counterforce on the first end face of the armature being promoted by rapid propagation of the fluid. Moreover, the covers 45A, 45B or catch hooks 45C act as damping elements, so that no damage to the permanent magnet 18 results due to the impact of the permanent magnet 18 on the pole core 11.
As is furthermore apparent from
As is furthermore apparent from
As is furthermore apparent from
As is furthermore apparent from
As is furthermore apparent from
As is furthermore apparent from
As is furthermore apparent from
As is furthermore apparent from
Alternatively, the magnetic force of the permanent magnet can be predetermined so that to open the solenoid valve 10A, the permanent magnet 18 moves the valve armature 40A in the direction of the pole core 11 during the opening movement if the pressure confined in the solenoid valve 10A sinks below a pre-determinable limiting value, so that the air gap 12 between the valve armature 40A and the pole core 11 is reduced in size and the closing element 41 is raised off the valve seat 15.1. In this embodiment, the solenoid valve 10A changes from the closed position into the open position without energizing of the magnet assembly 20A in dependence on the active hydraulic force and/or the confined pressure. This means that the magnetic force of the permanent magnet 18 is greater than the acting closing force, which the confined pressure and/or the restoring spring 16 generate if the confined pressure falls below the predetermined limiting value.
As is furthermore apparent from
In an alternative exemplary embodiment (not shown) of a bistable solenoid valve, in contrast to the illustrated exemplary embodiments of the bistable solenoid valve 10A, 10B, a restoring spring 16 is not arranged between the pole core 11 and the valve armature 40A, 40B, 40C. The permanent magnet 18 is then embodied in this exemplary embodiment as a circular disk or as a polygonal plate. Similarly to the illustrated exemplary embodiments, the permanent magnet 18 is retained on the pole core 11 in the deenergized open position of the exemplary embodiment (not shown) of the solenoid valve, so that the air gap 12 between pole core 11 and valve armature 40A, 40B, 40C is minimal and the closing element 41 is raised off the valve seat 15.1. For closing, the magnet assembly 20A, 20B of the solenoid valve (not shown) is energized during the closing movement using a first current direction, which generates the first magnetic field, which causes the pole core 11 to repel the permanent magnet 18 with the valve armature 40A, 40B, 40C, so that the air gap 12 between the valve armature 40A, 40B, 40C and the pole core 11 is enlarged and the closing element 41 is pushed into the valve seat 15.1. In contrast to the illustrated exemplary embodiments of the solenoid valve 10A, 10B, in the exemplary embodiment of the solenoid valve (not shown) only a pressure confined in the solenoid valve holds the closing element 41 in the valve seat 15.1 to form a seal. To open the solenoid valve, the magnet assembly 20A, 20B is energized during the opening movement using a second current direction, which generates a second magnetic field, which causes the pole core 11 and the permanent magnet 18 with the valve armature 40A, 40B, 40C to attract one another, so that the air gap 12 between the valve armature 40A, 40B, 40C and the pole core 11 is reduced in size and the closing element 41 is raised off the valve seat 15.1.
Alternatively, the magnetic force of the permanent magnet can be predetermined so that to open the solenoid valve, the permanent magnet 18 moves the valve armature 40A, 40B, 40C in the direction of the pole core 11 during the opening movement if the pressure confined in the solenoid valve sinks below a pre-determinable limiting value, so that the air gap 12 between the valve armature 40A, 40B, 40C and the pole core 11 is reduced in size and the closing element 41 is raised off the valve seat 15.1. In this embodiment, the solenoid valve changes from the closed position into the open position without energizing of the magnet assembly 20A, 20B in dependence on the active hydraulic force and/or on the confined pressure. This means that the magnetic force of the permanent magnet 18 is greater than the acting closing force which the confined pressure generates when the confined pressure falls below the predetermined limiting value.
As is furthermore apparent from
As is apparent from
As is furthermore apparent from
As is furthermore apparent from
For this purpose, the at least two brake circuits BC1A, BC2A can each comprise a bistable solenoid valve 10A, 10B (not shown in greater detail), which has a deenergized closed position and a deenergized open position and is switchable between the two positions. Thus, for example, in each case a first bistable solenoid valve 10A, 10B can be looped into the respective brake circuit BC1A, BC2A in such a way that in the deenergized open position, it releases the brake pressure regulation in at least one associated wheel brake RR, FL, FR, RL and in the deenergized closed position, it confines a present brake pressure in the at least one associated wheel brake RR, FL, FR, RL. The first bistable solenoid valves 10A, 10B can be looped at various positions into the respective brake circuit BC1A, BC2A. Thus, the bistable solenoid valves 10A, 10B can be looped into the respective brake circuit BC1A, BC2A, for example, between the corresponding switchover valve USV1, USV2 and the inlet valves EV1, EV2, EV3, EV4 before an outlet duct of the corresponding fluid pump RFP1, RFP2. Alternatively, the bistable solenoid valves 10A, 10B can each be looped into the respective brake circuit BC1A, BC2A between the master cylinder 5A and the corresponding switchover valve USV1, USV2 directly before the corresponding switchover valve USV1, USV2. As a further alternative arrangement, the bistable solenoid valves 10A, 10B can each be looped into the respective brake circuit BC1A, BC2A between the corresponding switchover valve USV1, USV2 and the inlet valves EV1, EV2, EV3, EV4 after the outlet duct of the fluid pump RFP1, RFP2. Moreover, in a further alternative arrangement, the bistable solenoid valves 10A, 10B can each be looped into the respective brake circuit BC1A, BC2A between the master cylinder 5A and the corresponding switchover valve USV1, USV2 in the common fluid branch directly after the master cylinder 5A. Moreover, the bistable solenoid valves 10A, 10B can each be looped into the respective brake circuit BC1A, BC2A directly before an associated wheel brake RR, FL, FR, RL.
Moreover, in the illustrated exemplary embodiment, the two switchover valves USV1, USV2 and the two suction valves HSV1, HSV2 can each be embodied as a bistable solenoid valve 10A, 10B.
As is furthermore apparent from
In the illustrated hydraulic braking system 1B, the brake pressure in the normal driving mode is not conventionally generated by a vacuum brake booster assisted via the driver foot, but rather via the motor-operated pressure generator ASP. When the driver actuates the brake pedal 3B, this braking intention is sensed by the system via corresponding sensor units (not shown) and the simulator valve SSV and the pressure switching valves PSV1, PSV2 and the brake circuit disconnecting valves CSV1, CSV2 are switched simultaneously. The simulator valve SSV is switched over from the deenergized closed position into the deenergized open position. The driver thus displaces volume in the pedal simulator PFS and the driver receives haptic feedback about the braking procedure. The two brake circuit disconnecting valves CSV1, CSV2 are switched over from the deenergized open position into the deenergized closed position, whereby the brake lines from the master cylinder 5B are blocked. The pressure switching valves PSVT, PSV2 are switched over from the deenergized closed position into the deenergized open position, whereby the brake lines from the pressure generator ASP to the brake circuits BC1B, BC2B are opened and the pressure generator ASP can set the desired wheel-individual brake pressure.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2017 208 938.5 | May 2017 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2018/058699 | 4/5/2018 | WO | 00 |