The present invention generally relates to packaging systems. More particularly, the present invention relates to a blending scale that accurately doses and homogeneously blends at least two types of granular and flowable products.
In various types of industry, several bagged products are composed of a mixture of 2 or more products. This is the case, among others, of certain animal foods, potting mixes, concrete mixtures, etc. In the cited examples, the importance of the homogeneity of the mixture and the proportions or quantities of each product is relatively low (usually not regulated or standardized). In some other cases, there is a need to homogeneously mix two products (or more) while ensuring that one of the products can be precisely measured to guarantee a minimum proportion or quantity of the latter in a precise quantity of the final blend. The seed industry is a prime example of this type of need.
In the seed industry (corn for example), the growing presence of genetically modified organisms (GMO) or genetically modified seeds (GM seeds) (referred to below as a main product) has created the need to implement laws to control environmental integrity. An example of genetic modification was to create a seed containing (into its genome) a common gene known to be toxic to several varieties of predators' larvae. In doing so, the plants themselves were able to produce a toxic protein and thus become resistant to predators (such as insects) without the need for spraying pesticides. To prevent environmental problems (such as insect mutations or insect dissemination), environmental authorities (such as the Environmental Protection Agency, EPA) established regulations concerning the use of these GM seeds. According to these regulations, the farmers were enforced to use a minimum percentage (traditionally 20%) of non-GM seeds, also known as “refuge” or sacrificial seeds (referred to below as an auxiliary product). This practice is intended to prevent the development of organisms resistant to the GM seeds or ensuring that enough organisms not in contact with GM seeds survive to reproduce. At that time, seed producers realized the competitive edge they would get if they succeed in reducing the proportion of regulated refuge seeds. In fact, non-GM seeds are more vulnerable and more likely to generate losses since they are not treated against predators. Consequently, reducing their proportion will reduce the farmers' losses. Advances in this field allow a decrease of the proportion of non-GM seeds (in such cases 5%). The EPA accepted this reduction but regulated that farmers were no longer allowed to make the compliant refuge proportion (blend) themselves. Seed producers were appointed to make the blend, to record production data and to regularly report to the EPA. Then, they started developing (among others) the concept of refuge-in-the-bag (RIB) which provides the right blend (both type of GM and non-GM seeds) based on the refuge percentage required for a particular corn technology. The RIB concept is convenient for farmers because it enables them to plant only one seed product and brings the following benefits: easier planter configuration, less losses, lower operating costs, less manipulation, less proportion errors, more homogeneous fields, etc. . . . ).
In this example, it is understood that there is a product in a first proportion (which is referred to below as the main product) in which will be incorporated added product(s) of a second proportion (referred to below as the auxiliary product).
Weighing equipment used in the bagging process of products that need to be weighed, such as industrial scales, are equipped with a weighing controller that measures the correct weight to be put into each container.
In the present description, it is to be understood that the term “dosing” includes actions of carrying out a measurement (such as weighing, for example) of a product and releasing the product.
The main characteristics required for dosing and blending seeds are summarily presented hereinbelow:
The prior art documents teach that some dosing and blending systems dedicated to dose different products possess some of the characteristics described hereinabove, but none of them adequately meet all of the described requirements. The following summary analysis highlights the weaknesses of the existing dosing and blending systems.
“Mixing before weighing” processes use different means to mix the products before the dosing operation and measure the total product weight. These systems cannot guarantee the proportions of the blend or homogeneity of the blend due to probable segregation happening in the systems between the mixing action and the final weighing. Therefore, “mixing before weighing” is not an adequate solution in contexts and applications where requirements are more strict.
Combination scales (also named multi head weighers) include several weigh pans (up to 24) which perform accurate weighings of one or multiple products, allowing proportion control, recordability and traceability of data. A certain number of these weighings are combined to reach (or to get as close as possible to) the desired weight, which is calculated. However, combination scales cannot guarantee the homogeneity of the blend since they drop the different products together in a filling chute and rely on the falling action to mix the blend. Moreover, for most of the existing packaging plants, these weighers are too large to retrofit the weighing systems already in place.
Dedicated dosing systems (as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,137,729 B2) can provide a homogeneous blend using a mechanical blender. However, this practice lengthens the system cycle time (thus reducing production rate) and takes up too much place to be integrated with typical compact bagging systems. These systems measure the total product weight, but cannot guarantee the product proportions.
The following table illustrates how the above-mentioned prior art teachings address in part the above needs:
Although different dosing systems are already known and satisfy at least one of the above needs, there is still a need for a dosing system which will meet a majority, if not all, of the requirements described above.
According to the present invention, there is provided a blending scale that is a system for dosing and blending two products consisting of a section for dosing the auxiliary product, a section for feeding the main product and a section for weighing the blend. The blending scale comprises:
Preferably, the present invention measures a defined quantity of the auxiliary product (in this case by weight) and records this value. In other embodiments, the measurements may be done by volume, grain count, particle count, product quantity count or any similar parameter indicative of the quantity of product. The proportion of each product is precisely controlled and may be flexible (it is possible to vary the proportion of each product) in order to meet standards or legal requirements. In fact, in the seed industry for example, a minimal proportion of the auxiliary product is regulated.
Preferably, the present invention provides a homogeneous blend through a dispensing pan which has a controlled opening and a special shape to control the flow and dispersion of the auxiliary product within the dynamic unconstrained stream of the main product. Releasing the auxiliary product in a synchronized manner with the feeding of the main product and properly orient the auxiliary product towards the main product stream helps converge the respective flows of the two products, resulting in a homogeneous (evenly distributed) blend.
Preferably, the present invention precisely measures the total quantity (in this case by weight) of the blend. Since the system had previously measured the auxiliary product, the quantity of the main product is calculated by subtracting the recorded quantity of the auxiliary product from the measured quantity of the blend. In order to obtain a precise total weight, the system may vary the main product quantity according to the (previously measured) auxiliary product.
Preferably, the present invention records and tracks the measured auxiliary product, the total blend quantity as well as each product proportion within each unit. These data may be compiled to allow the issuance of reports to legal entities if required.
Preferably, considering the simplicity of the overall arrangement of the blending scale, the present invention is compact to be integrated to typical packaging systems and may be retrofitted to existing packaging systems.
According to the present invention, there is also provided a method for accurately dosing and homogeneously blending a main product and an auxiliary product comprising the steps of:
Preferably, the method repeats several cycles of steps a) through h).
These and other objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent upon reading the detailed description and upon referring to the drawings in which:
According to the present invention, and as shown in
Referring now to
Referring now to
The controller 20 is an industrial PLC that receives signals from the auxiliary product dosing device 10 and the blend collector 40 to control the desired parameter of the products (auxiliary product and total blend), records the data and controls all the signals to achieve the correct sequence.
According to the present invention, there is also provided a method for accurately measuring a quantity and homogeneously blending a main product and an auxiliary product comprising the steps of:
Preferably, during steps d) and e), steps a) and b) can be performed concurrently so as to prepare for the next cycle of measuring a quantity and homogeneously blending a main product and an auxiliary product.
Preferably, the parameters to be measured by the auxiliary product dosing device 10 and the blend collector 40 can be any one of the following: weight, volume, grain count, particle count, product quality count, or any other similar parameter indicative of a quantity of product.
As would be apparent to a person skilled in the art, the dynamic unconstrained stream consists of the main product free-falling in open air, not encased by a chute, conduit, or other like device, to which is added the auxiliary product according to the quantities and sequence as described above.
Preferably, the main product feeding system 50 is composed of a main feeding hopper 501 and a main feeder 502. In this embodiment, the main feeder 502 is a vertical conduit with a catch gate which opens to release the main product to the blend collector 40 and closes to stop the flow.
As better illustrated in
Although preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described in detail herein and illustrated in the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to these precise embodiments and that various changes and modifications may be effected therein without departing from the scope or spirit of the present invention. Furthermore, it is apparent that this invention can apply to many other uses.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/368,278, filed on Jul. 28, 2010 and entitled “Blending Scale”. The above patent application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61368278 | Jul 2010 | US |