Blends of a polycarbonate resin and interpolymer modifier

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to blends of a polycarbonate resin and an interpolymer modifier, said blends having good processing characteristics, impact resistance and weatherability. The resulting blends are useful in the production of weatherable, impact resistant molded and shaped articles.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Polycarbonate resins are tough, rigid engineering thermoplastics having good impact strength. They, however, have low flow characteristics which sometimes causes difficulties in processing. Various prior art attempts have been made to blend polycarbonate resins with other polymeric modifiers to solve this problem while still retaining the toughness and impact resistance of the polycarbonate resin.
Acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) graft copolymers have been blended with polycarbonate resins to yield a lower cost blend having improved processing characteristics while retaining good impact resistance (see U.S. Pat. No. 3,130,177 to T. S. Grabowski, and Plastics World, November 1977, pp. 56-58). The impact resistance of such blends, however, tends to deteriorate after the material has been exposed to such environmental factors as sunlight.
Blends of polycarbonate resin and acrylic/styrene polymers are also known (U.S. Pat. No. 3,655,826 to R. P. Fellmann et al. and Japanese Patent Document No. 52-94349).
SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
The present invention relates to weatherable, impact resistant blends of: (1) a polycarbonate resin; and (2) an interpolymer modifier comprising crosslinked (meth)-acrylate, crosslinked styrene-acrylonitrile, and uncrosslinked styrene-acrylonitrile polymeric components, said blends having improved processability as compared to polycarbonate resin alone. The particular type of interpolymer used as one component in the blends of the present invention is responsible for this improvement in their processing characteristics while conferring a greater degree of weather resistance on the blends (as compared to conventional ABS resin additives) and also maintaining acceptable, even superior, impact resistance for the blends (as compared to the use of conventional acrylic/styrene containing polymers).
DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
The blends of the present invention comprise: (1) a polycarbonate resin; and (2) an interpolymer modifier comprising crosslinked (meth)acrylate, crosslinked styrene-acrylonitrile, and uncrosslinked styrene-acrylonitrile polymeric components.
The term "polycarbonate resin", as used herein, is intended to encompass polycarbonate-type resins which are formed by the condensation polymerization of a dihydric phenol, such as a bis(hydroxyphenyl)alkane, and a carbonate precursor, such as a carbonyl halide, as major monomeric reactants. Details regarding the structure of these materials and the processes for forming them are available from a number of sources including "Polycarbonates", Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Second Edition, Vol. 16, pp. 106-115, John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 1968, which is incorporated herein by reference. If desired, the monomeric reaction medium used to form such polycarbonate-type resins can contain other monomeric reactants that do not adversely affect the basic characteristics of the polycarbonate resin. Representative examples of possible additional monomeric reactants include: reactive flame retardant monomers, chain branching monomers, chain transfer agents, and the like. Some recently issued patents which describe some of the various types of reactants that may be used to form these polycarbonate resins include: U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,766,139 and 3,931,108; and U.S. Pat. No. Re. 27,682.
The terminology "interpolymer modifier comprising crosslinked (meth)acrylate, crosslinked styrene-acrylonitrile, uncrosslinked styrene acrylonitrile components" is meant to encompass the type of interpolymer compositions described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,944,631 to A. J. Yu et al. These interpolymer compositions are formed by the following type of three-step, sequential polymerization process:
1. emulsion polymerizing a monomer charge (herein designated "(meth)acrylate", for purposes of the present invention), of at least one C.sub.2 -C.sub.10 alkyl acrylate, C.sub.8 -C.sub.22 alkyl methacrylate, or compatible mixtures thereof, in an aqueous polymerization medium in the presence of an effective amount of a suitable di- or polyethylenically unsaturated crosslinking agent for such a type of monomer, with the C.sub.4 -C.sub.8 alkyl acrylates being the preferred (meth)acrylate monomers for use in this step;
2. emulsion polymerizing a monomer charge of styrene and acrylonitrile in an aqueous polymerization medium, also in the presence of an effective amount of a suitable di- or polyethylenically unsaturated crosslinking agent for such monomers, said polymerization being carried out in the presence of the product from Step 1 so that the crosslinked (meth)acrylate and crosslinked styrene-acrylonitrile components form an interpolymer wherein the respective phases surround and penetrate one another; and
3. either emulsion or suspension polymerizing a monomer charge of styrene and acrylonitrile, in the absence of a crosslinking agent, in the presence of the product resulting from Step 2. If desired, Steps 1 and 2 can be reversed in the above described procedure.
This product, which is used as the interpolymer modifier in the blends of the present invention generally comprises from about 5% to about 50%, by weight, of at least one of the above-identified crosslinked (meth)acrylates, from about 5% to about 35%, by weight, of the crosslinked styrene-acrylonitrile component and from about 15% to about 90%, by weight, of the uncrosslinked styrene-acrylonitrile component. It contains little graft polymerization between the styrene-acrylonitrile copolymer components and the crosslinked (meth)acrylate polymeric component. Further details regarding this type of polymer composition can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 3,944,631 to A. J. Yu et al., which is incorporated herein by reference.
Blending of the aforementioned polycarbonate resin and interpolymer modifier can be effected by any of the well-known polymer blending processes, such as two-roll or Banbury milling, single or multiple screw extrusion or any other method which applies sufficient heat and shear to the respective polymeric ingredients (polycarbonate resin and interpolymer modifier) to obtain a satisfactory blend in accordance with the present invention. Generally, blends with desirable properties can be obtained by blending the polymeric ingredients of the blend at temperatures of from about 176.7.degree. C. to about 315.6.degree. C., with the most preferable results being realized at from about 204.4.degree. C. to about 287.8.degree. C. because at lower blending temperatures there is the possibility of a lessening in the impact properties of the blend, while at higher temperatures there is the possibility that degradation of the interpolymer modifier may result. Blending at higher temperatures involves an additional expenditure of heat energy.
Useful, weatherable, processable blends of the polycarbonate resin and the above-described interpolymer modifier can be formulated in weight ratios of polycarbonate to interpolymer ranging from about 90:10 to about 5:95, preferably from about 70:30 to about 30:70, depending upon the types of physical properties desired in the final product. Such conventional processes as injection molding, extrusion, sheet extrusion followed by thermoforming, compression molding, and rotational molding can be used. If desired, final articles containing the blends of the present invention can be formed directly from powders of the polycarbonate and interpolymer, without prior blending, by either direct extrusion or injection molding of mixtures of such powders.
Generally, the use of lower amounts of modifier will yield a blend which has a greater degree of toughness and a higher heat deflection temperature. The use of higher amounts of the modifier will yield a more easily processable blend. It has been found that injection molded specimens of the blends containing low amounts of modifier will have greater impact resistance than specimens formed by compression molding. When compression molding is used, blends containing either high or low amounts of the modifier have a lessened impact resistance as compared to blends containing the polycarbonate and interpolymer modifier in a more equivalent amount, for example, from about 40:60 to about 60:40.

The following Examples illustrate certain preferred embodiments for the blends of the present invention and illustrate some of their properties.
EXAMPLE 1
This Example illustrates the process that was used to make the crosslinked acrylate/crosslinked styrene-acrylonitrile/uncrosslinked styrene-acrylonitrile interpolymer modifier of the type described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,944,631 to A. J. Yu et al. which was used in the blends described in Example 2.
The following ingredients were used in the three-step, all-emulsion, polymerization sequence:
______________________________________STEP 1Ingredients Amount (in gm.)______________________________________Butyl acrylate monomer 5,334.5Butylene glycol diacrylatecrosslinker 12.8Deionized water 41,172.1Ammonium persulfate initiator 21.3Disodium isodecyl sulfosuccinateemulsifier (AEROSOL A-268 fromAmerican Cyanamid) - 50 wt. %solution 85.3Sodium bicarbonate buffer 21.3______________________________________
______________________________________STEP 2Ingredients Amount (in gm.)______________________________________Styrene monomer 1,414.1Acrylonitrile monomer 523Divinyl benzene crosslinker(55 wt. % solution) 7.76______________________________________
______________________________________STEP 3Ingredients Amount (in gm.)______________________________________Styrene monomer 1,916.17Acrylonitrile monomer 716.3Sodium lauryl sulfate emulsifier(SIPEX UB from Alcolac, Inc.)30 wt. % solution 302.7Ammonium persulfate initiator 24t-dodecyl mercaptan chaintransfer agent 29.1______________________________________
______________________________________Post TreatmentIngredients Amount (in gm.)______________________________________Butylated hydroxy toluene(0.2 wt. % solution) 38.73Hindered phenolic oxidative/thermal stabilizer (IRGANOX,from Ciba-Geigy Corp.) - 0.05wt. % solution 9.69______________________________________
The following polymerization procedure was used:
Steps 1 and 2:
1. The butyl acrylate monomer and butylene glycol diacrylate crosslinking agent were premixed.
2. All the ingredients for Step 1 were then charged into a reactor equipped with a stirrer and were agitated at 90 to 100 rpm.
3. The reactor was evacuated for 5 min., and nitrogen gas was then charged into the reactor to break the vacuum so as to exclude oxygen from the reactor interior. This operation was repeated once.
4. The reaction mixture was then heated to 60.degree. C., and this temperature was maintained until the solids content in the mixture had reached 11% by weight.
5. The reactor was then evacuated, and the styrene, acrylonitrile and divinyl benzene reactants for Step 2 were added. The pressure was returned to 0 kg./cm..sup.2 gauge.
6. The reaction mixture was maintained at 60.degree. C. until the solids content had reached 14% by weight.
Step 3:
7. The reactor was again evacuated, and the ingredients for Step 3 were added. The pressure was returned to 0 kg./cm..sup.2 gauge.
8. The temperature was maintained at 60.degree. C. until the solids content had reached 31%, by weight, which indicated substantial completion of the reaction.
9. The reaction mixture was then allowed to cool.
Post Treatment:
10. The post treatment ingredients were then added to terminate the reaction and stabilize the product against oxidative or thermal degradation and the mixture was stirred for 15 minutes.
11. The reaction mixture was filtered through a screen to separate reactor coagulum.
12. The latex from the filtering operation was then coagulated by addition of magnesium sulfate at a pH of 3.5 and the mixture was centrifuged and reslurried twice. The coagulated product was then dried.
EXAMPLE 2
This Example illustrates the general procedure that was used to make polycarbonate/interpolymer modifier blends for testing, with the modifier being made in accordance with Example 1.
The modifier from Example 1, and the polycarbonate resin (LEXAN 101, from General Electric Company) were both dried at 110.degree. C. for several hours. Varying selected amounts of each were then mixed in pellet form and were extruded twice at 260.degree. C. and 60 rpm in a single screw extruder having a 3.81 cm. diameter, and a length to diameter ratio of 20:1. The extrusion screw was a two-stage screw with a compression ratio of 2:1. Varying amounts were also injection molded at front zone temperatures ranging from 232.degree. C. to 288.degree. C., depending upon polycarbonate content.
Compression molding temperatures of appropriate test pieces ranged from 204.degree. C. to 232.degree. C., using 9072 kg. pressure to form 15.24 cm..times.15.24 cm..times.0.3175 cm. plaques.
The Table which follows shows the blends that were prepared and the physical properties which were obtained.
______________________________________ Izod Impact*Wt. % in Blend (J/m)Modifier Polycarbonate Inj. Molded Comp. Molded______________________________________100 0 182 22475 25 432 43850 50 598 59825 75 689 4700 100 993 85______________________________________ *ASTM-D256, Method A, 0.3175 cm. thick specimens. The abbreviation "J/m" stands for Joules/meter. Higher numbers are more desirable.
______________________________________ Heat DeflectionWt. % in Blend Tensile Flex. Temp. Poly- Yield Modulus** Under Load**Modifier carbonate (MPa) Stress* (GPa) (.degree. C.)______________________________________100 0 41.3 1.74 8775 25 45.8 1.82 9450 50 50.3 2.05 10425 75 54.3 2.08 1260 100 59.9 2.16 136______________________________________ *for injection molded samples using ASTM-D638 with the modifications whic follow. The specimens were 0.32 cm. .times. 0.32 cm. in cross-section wit a gauge length of 1.42 cm. The abbreviation "MPa" stands for megapascals (10.sup.6 Pa). Higher numbers are more desirable. **for compression molded pieces using ASTM-D790, Method I, Procedure A (specimen cross-section: 1.27 cm. .times. 0.32 cm., 5.08 cm. span) and ASTM D-648 (load 1.82 MPa; specimen thickness 0.32 cm.), respectively. Th abbreviation "Gpa" stands for gigapascals (10.sup.9 Pa). Higher numbers are more desirable.
EXAMPLE 3
This Example illustrates the process used to prepare another interpolymer modifier of the type described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,944,631 to A. J. Yu et al. containing a lower rubber content than was present in the modifier of Example 1. This modifier was then used to form the blends described in Example 4.
The following ingredients were used in a three-step, all-emulsion, polymerization:
______________________________________STEP 1Ingredients Amount (in gm.)______________________________________Butyl acrylate monomer 1,786Butylene glycol diacrylate crosslinker 4.27Deionized water 13,720Ammonium persulfate initiator 7.1Disodium isodecyl sulfosuccinateemulsifier (AEROSOL A-268) - 50 wt.% solution 28.4Sodium bicarbonate buffer 7.1______________________________________
______________________________________STEP 2Ingredients Amount (in gm.)______________________________________Styrene monomer 471.4Acrylonitrile monomer 174.3Divinyl benzene crosslinker(55 wt. % solution) 2.59______________________________________
______________________________________STEP 3Ingredients Amount (in gm.)______________________________________Styrene monomer 11,255Acrylonitrile monomer 4,167Deionized water 24,239Sodium lauryl sulfate emulsifier(SIPEX UB) - 30 wt. % solution 386Ammonium persulfate initiator 30.6t-dodecyl mercaptan chain transfer agent 37.1______________________________________
______________________________________Post Treatment:Ingredients Amount (in gm.)______________________________________Butylated hydroxy toluene(0.2 wt. % solution) 35.8Hindered phenolic oxidative/thermal stabilizer (IRGANOX)0.05 wt. % solution 8.9______________________________________
The following polymerization procedure was employed:
Steps 1 and 2, as described in Example 1, were used with a 18.92 liter reactor being employed.
The procedure for Step 3 was as follows:
1. The water, emulsifier and initiator for Step 3 were charged into a 75.7 liter reactor and the mixture was agitated at 90 to 100 rpm.
2. The product latex from Step 2 was added to this reactor along with the styrene and acrylonitrile.
3. The reactor was evacuated, and the vacuum was broken with nitrogen gas. This procedure was repeated once.
4. The pressure was returned to 0 psig, and the mixture was heated to 60.degree. C.
5. The reaction was allowed to continue until a 32 wt. % solids content of product was reached.
6. The same post treatment procedure shown in Example 1 was used.
7. The product was coagulated using aluminum sulfate and was washed twice and dried as described in Example 1.
EXAMPLE 4
This Example reports the test results for various compositions, some of which contain the modifier of Example 3. The test procedures described in Example 2 were employed.
______________________________________ Izod ImpactWt. % in Blend (J/m)Modifier Polycarbonate Inj. Molded Comp. Molded______________________________________100 0 -- 21 50 50 502 288 0 100 993 85______________________________________ Heat DeflectionWt. % in Blend Tensile at Flex. Temp. Poly Yield Modulus Under LoadModifier carbonate (MPa) (GPa) (.degree. C.)______________________________________100 0 -- 2.59 94 50 50 59.2 2.34 103 0 100 59.9 2.16 136______________________________________
EXAMPLE 5
This Example illustrates the mechanical properties for a series of blends of polycarbonate and various types of modifier additives.
Sample No. 1 is a blend of 60 wt. % polycarbonate resin and 40 wt. % of the modifier of Example 1.
Sample No. 2 is a blend of 60 wt. % polycarbonate and 40 wt. % of the modifier of Example 3.
Sample No. 3 is a commercially available blend of 60 weight % polycarbonate and 40 wt. % of an ABS resin additive. This is presented for comparative purposes.
______________________________________ Flex. ModulusSample No. Tensile Yield Str. (MPa) (GPa)______________________________________1 51.9 2.162 61.5 2.453 58.9 2.45(Comparative) Heat Deflection Temp. Under Load HardnessSample No. (.degree. C.) (Barcol)______________________________________1 102 702 107 773 108 76(Comparative) Izod Impact NotchedSample No. (J/m) Reversed Notch______________________________________1 587 1,8692 566 2,6703 480 3,043(Comparative)______________________________________
EXAMPLE 6
Specimens of the three types of samples shown in Example 5 were exposed, for varying lengths of time in an Xenon arc accelerated aging apparatus, and their impact values were tested on the exposed sides using the conventional notched and reversed notch Izod tests. The blends of the present invention (Sample Nos. 1 and 2) showed a superior retention of impact resistance compared to a conventional polycarbonate/ABS blend comparative (Sample No. 3).
______________________________________ Notch Izod Impact Strength (J/m)Sample No. Direction Initial 25 hours 100 hours______________________________________1 Forward 587 609 603 Reverse 1,879 1,795 1,2812 Forward 566 582 555 Reverse 2,678 2,947 2,4343 Forward 480 395 315(Compara- Reverse 3,032 1,281 598tive)Sample No. Notch Direction 300 hours 800 hours______________________________________1 Forward 512 491 Reverse 988 9182 Forward 448 438 Reverse 582 5553 Forward 224 96*(Comparative) Reverse 235 160*______________________________________ *brittle fracture occurred.
EXAMPLE 8
This Example illustrates the melt viscosity values for a series of materials. Lower numbers indicate a more easily processable material.
______________________________________ Melt ViscosityMaterial (poise at 1000 sec.sup.1)______________________________________Polycarbonate (control) 9200Yu et al. interpolymer modifier(from Example 1) (control) 263060 wt. % polycarbonate/40 wt.% Yu et al. interpolymermodifier 3300______________________________________
A commercially available blend of 60 wt. % polycarbonate and 40 wt. % ABS has a melt viscosity of 3100 poise (at 1000 sec.sup.-1) which is only slightly less than the melt viscosity of a 60:40 blend formed in accordance with the present invention.
The foregoing Examples illustrate certain preferred embodiments of the present invention and should not be construed in a limiting sense. The scope of protection that is sought is set forth in the claims which follow.

Number	Name	Date
3130177	Grabowski	Apr 1964
3239582	Keskkula et al.	Mar 1966
3345434	Griffith	Oct 1967
3655826	Fillmann et al.	Apr 1972
3843390	Hudson et al.	Oct 1974
3896185	Yonemitsu et al.	Jul 1975
3944631	Yu et al.	Mar 1976
3957921	Iwahashi et al.	May 1976

Blends of a polycarbonate resin and interpolymer modifier

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

US Classifications

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

US Referenced Citations (8)

Foreign Referenced Citations (1)

Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)