1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a bilateral hearing aid system comprising at least one bone conduction output transducer.
2. Description of Related Art
Examples of bone conduction hearing aid systems are described in U.S. Patent Application Publications 2009/0245553 A1 and 2009/0247810 A1.
Bone conduction hearing aids are used by patients who cannot benefit from electro-acoustic hearing aids. Most of them are suffering from malformed ears, conductive hearing loss or single-sided deafness.
In general, bone conduction hearing aids use a mechanical transducer coupled to the skull to directly transfer sound vibrations through the bone to the cochlea, thereby bypassing the outer and the middle ear.
In case of non-implanted devices the transducer may be incorporated in a BTE (Behind The Ear) housing or an ITE (In the Ear) shell, having direct contact to the skull with the skin in-between, or it may be coupled to the skull using a head belt or an eyeglass adapter, or it may be coupled to the teeth.
In bone-anchored devices, surgically implanted abutments in the skull are used to achieve an improved coupling between the transducer and the skull. Such abutments may be magnets offering a strong transcutaneous magnetic coupling with the externally located transducer, or they may be designed as a percutaneous “screw” on which the transducer is sitting.
Usually the transducer forms part or is connected to an external sound processor, which typically is a BTE- or ITE-type device comprising one or more microphones, a signal processing and amplification unit and a driver for the transducer. The sound processor device is usually placed close to the ear to provide the most natural sound pick up position for the microphones. The transducer may be integrated in the sound processor housing or it may be a separate element connected by wire or by a wireless radio link to the sound processor.
It is generally desirable to fit hearing aids bilaterally in order to achieve the well-known advantages of binaural hearing in terms of speech understanding, sound quality and spatial hearing.
However, the benefit of bilateral fittings is limited in case of bone conduction hearing aids. The reason is that the interaural time differences (ITD) and interaural leveled differences (ILD) cues are disturbed due to the strong transcranial cross-talk effect of bone conduction. Bone-conducted vibrations reach the contralateral cochlea with an average attenuation of just about 10 dB compared to the ipsilateral cochlea. By contrast, for air conduction, i.e. electro-acoustic, hearing aids, the interaural attenuation typically is more than 50 dB. Hence, in case of bone conduction there is an unnatural interference of the sound coming from the ipsilateral transducer and the contralateral transducer. The result are deteriorated ITDs and ILDs, so that the benefit of binaural hearing is quite small compared to what could be expected is the cochleae received proper stimuli.
International Patent Application Publication WO 2009/101622 A2 relates to a sound system for reproducing recorded sound, comprising several loudspeakers and bone conduction speakers to be located at the right side and the left side of a user's head. It is mentioned that transcranial cross talking occurs with the use of bone conduction speakers, and a theoretical analysis of this effect is described. It is also mentioned that interesting effects can be achieved by controlling such cross-talking effect.
The article “Head-related two-channel stereophony with loudspeaker reproduction”, by P. Damaske, JASA, Vol 50, 1971 relates to cross-talk compensation techniques for virtual acoustic imaging with two free-field loudspeakers.
It is an object of the invention to provide for a bilateral hearing aid system comprising at least one bone conduction output transducer, wherein binaural hearing effects should be preserved as far as possible. It is a further object of the invention to provide for a corresponding hearing assistance method.
According to the invention, these objects are achieved by a bilateral bone conduction hearing aid system, a corresponding hearing assistance method, a bimodal hearing aid system as defined in claim 9 and a corresponding hearing assistance method as described herewith.
The invention is beneficial in that, by exchanging cross-talk compensation signals generated according to the respective estimated transcranial transfer function between the right ear side and the left ear side and by subjecting such contralateral cross-talk compensation signal from the “direct” ipsilateral signal prior to supplying the ipsilateral signal as input to the bone conduction output transducer, cross talk compensation can be achieved, thereby preserving binaural effects.
These and further objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following description when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings which, for purposes of illustration only, show several embodiments in accordance with the present invention.
The output transducer 16A may be a bone conduction transducer of any type. In particular, the output transducer 16A may be for direct contact with the skin at the user's skull, or it may be for engagement with implantable abutments. The output transducer 16A also may be coupled to the skull using a head belt or an eyeglass adapter, or it may be coupled to the teeth. The microphone arrangement 12A may comprise a single microphone or a plurality of spaced-apart microphones for enabling acoustic beam forming.
The right ear hearing aid 10A may be realized as a BTE hearing aid, ITE hearing aid or as part of an eyeglass frame. The output transducer 16A may be integrated in the housing of the hearing aid 10A, or it may be realized as an external part connected by wire or by using a wireless radio link to the hearing aid 10A.
The left ear hearing aid 10B comprises the like components as the right ear hearing aid 10A, but in a mirror-like manner, i.e. the left ear filter unit 18B is for generating a left ear cross-talk compensation signal from the processed audio signals of the left ear signal processing unit 14B according to an estimated transcranial transfer function from the left ear bone conduction output transducer 16B to the right ear cochlea 20A, and the adder unit 22B is for adding the right ear cross-talk compensation signal generated by the right ear filter unit 18B to the processed audio signals produced by the left ear audio signal processing unit 14B.
The hearing aids 10A, 10B also include means for exchanging the cross-talk compensation signals between the hearing aids, i.e. means for sending the right ear cross-talk compensation signal from the right ear filter unit 18A to the left hear hearing aid 10B and for sending the left ear cross-talk compensation signal from the left ear filter unit 18B to the right ear hearing aid 10A. Such signal exchange may be realized by a wire connection indicated at 28A and 28B in
Such wired or wireless bidirectional audio link between the right ear hearing aid 10A and the left ear hearing aid 10B may be used not only to exchange the cross-talk compensation signals, but also to exchange audio signals used for acoustic beam forming, noise reduction and/or auditory scene classification, see e.g. V. Hamacher, U. Kornagel, T. Lotter, H. Puder: “Binaural signal processing in hearing aids”, in “Advanced in Digital Speech Transmission”, R. Martin, U. Heute, C. Antweiler (eds.), p. 401-30, Wiley, 2008.
In
The cranial transfer functions from the transducer contact points to the ipsilateral cochlea 20A, 20B are represented by B11(z) and B22(z), respectively, while the transcranial transfer functions from the transducer coupling points to the contralateral cochlea 20B and 20A are designated by B12(z) and B21(z), respectively, with the transcranial transfer functions describing the transfer functions of the cross-talk paths. The sum of the sound arriving from the ipsilateral (“wanted”) and the contralateral (“unwanted cross talk”) transducer at the particular cochlea 20A or 20B is described by Z1(z) and Z2(z), respectively.
According to S. Stenfelt and R. L. Goode: “Transmission properties of bone conducted sound: Measurements in cadaver heads”, JASA 118(4), p. 2373-91, the transmission of vibration in the skull below the first skull resonance frequency, which is approximately 1 kHz, can be approximated by a linear system; for higher frequencies it is not clear whether the bone conduction by the skull can be modeled by a digital filter. However, it is well-known that the frequencies below 1 kHz significantly contribute to binaural hearing benefits, so that a solution reducing cross talk below 1 kHz would be beneficial.
It is the object of the invention to eliminate, as far as possible, the cross-talk signals caused by the transcranial transfer functions B12 and B21. To this end, the right ear hearing aid 10A is provided with a filter unit 18A providing for a transfer function C1(z), and the left ear hearing aid 10B is provide with a filter unit 18B providing for a transfer function C2(z). The filter unit 18A provides for a right ear cross-talk compensation signal, and the filter unit 18B provides for a left ear cross-talk compensation signal, respectively, which signal is combined with the respective contralateral processed audio signal X1′(z) and X2′(z). In practice, the cross-talk compensation signals are negative, so that the respective cross talk compensation signal actually is subtracted from the respective contralateral processed audio signal in order to generate the output signal supplied to the transducer 16A and 16B, respectively.
The signals Z1(z) and Z2(z) arriving at the right ear cochlea 20A and the left ear cochlea 20B, respectively, is given by (in the following “z” will be omitted for simplification):
If the Filters C1(z) and C2(z) are chosen to:
C1=−[B12S1]/[B22S2] (3)
C2=−[B21S2]/[B11S1] (4)
the cross-talk is cancelled out, i.e. both cochlear receive only bone conducted signals coming from the ipsilateral transducer.
For Z1(z) and Z2(z) one then finds:
Z1=G1S1B11[1−(B21B12)/(B11B22)]X1 (5)
Z2=G2S2B22[1−(B21B12)/(B11B22)]X2 (6)
In other words, for generating the cross-talk compensation signals not only the estimated transcranial transfer function but also the estimated ipsilateral cranial transfer function is taken into account. In particular, the right ear cross-talk compensation signal may be generated by amplifying the processed right ear audio signals, i.e. the output signals of the right ear audio signal processing unit 14A, by a factor corresponding to the ratio of the cranial transfer functions from the right ear output transducer 16A to the right ear cochlea 20A and the transcranial transfer functions from the left ear output transducer 16B to the right ear cochlea 20A, multiplied by the ratio of the right ear output transducer transfer function to the left ear output transducer transfer function. The left ear cross-talk compensation signal is generated analogously.
These transfer functions B11, B12, B22 and B21 may be estimated by picking up bone conduction sound reaching the right ear cochlea 20A and bone conduction sound reaching the left ear cochlea 20B by using vibration sensors, such as accelerometer sensors, 34A and 34B attached to the skull on the mastoid at a position as close to the respective cochlea 20A, 20B as possible, and wherein the bone conduction sound is generated by the right ear output transducer 16A and the left ear output transducer 16B, respectively. Since the transfer functions B11, B12, B22 and B21 usually do not change, the accelerometer sensors, 34A and 34B are removed after the fitting procedure.
The best measurement position, of course, would be the respective cochlea 20A, 20B itself. However, in view of the relatively large wavelength of bone conducted sound, the cross-talk cancellation effect provided by the present invention at a place quite close to the cochlea should not deviate too much from the effect at the cochlea itself.
For the calculation of the transfer functions, which has to deal with stability, causality and delay issues, signal processing techniques known from virtual audio imaging can be applied, such as techniques described in J. Kim, S. Kim, C. Yoo, “A Novel Adaptive Crosstalk Cancellation using Psychoacoustic Model for 3D Audio”, Proceedings Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2007, ICASSP 2007, Vol. 1, p. I-185-1-188. The transcranial transfer function B12, B21 and the cranial transfer function B11, B22 for each of the ears may be estimated by using the both output transducers 16A, 16B, the ipsilateral vibration sensor (which is in case of the left ear the sensor 34B), and the contralateral processed audio signals (in this case the audio signals generated by the right ear audio signal processing unit 14A from the audio signals captured by the right ear microphone arrangement 12A), while the ipsilateral audio signal processing unit (here the left ear unit 14B) is not involved. Then the cross-talk compensation signal provided by the contralateral filter unit (here the right ear unit 18A) is adjusted so as to minimize the signal picked up by the ipsilateral vibration sensor 34B. For minimizing the signal picked up by the ipsilateral vibration sensor 34B a least mean squares (LMS) algorithm may be used. An example of such measurement configuration is shown in
Alternatively, standard filters based on empiric cranial transfer function data averaged across a large group of persons, i.e., “default filters” based on measured transfer functions averaged across a large group of persons, may be used for determining the transfer functions of the filter units 18A, 18B.
In addition, after minimizing the signal picked up by the ipsilateral vibration sensor as described with regard to
Alternatively, the cross-talk compensation signal may be adjusted so as to minimize the measured vibrations of the middle ear ossicles, of the oval window or of the round window. Such vibration measurements may be performed in a non-invasive manner by using, for example, a Laser-Doppler-vibrometer through the tympanic membrane.
It is also to be noted that the filter units 18A and 18B attenuate the ipsilateral signals by the factors [1−(B21B12)/(B11B22)]. Since |B12|<|B11| and |B21|<|B22| and since there are phases differences in B12 vs. B11 and B21 vs. B22, the attenuation factor can be small but never be zero, so that it can be compensated by applying the additional gain [1−(B21B12)/(B11B22)]−1 to G1(z) and G2(z) respectively. Preferably, such attenuation is compensated by applying an appropriate additional gain in the audio signal processing unit 14A and 14B.
The measurement set-up of
In general, the above-described principle of cross-talk compensation may be applied also to bilateral system comprising a bone conduction transducer only on one side/ear, while at the other side/ear a type of output transducer other than bone conduction is used, such as a loudspeaker.
In
Such type of output transducer 116B does not provide for a significant cross-talk signal to the other (right) cochlea 20A (i.e. the transcranial transfer function B21 of
The impact of the cross-talk compensation signal on the gain of the left ear hearing aid 10B has to be compensated in the manner discussed above with regard to the system of
While various embodiments in accordance with the present invention have been shown and described, it is understood that the invention is not limited thereto, and is susceptible to numerous changes and modifications as known to those skilled in the art. Therefore, this invention is not limited to the details shown and described herein, and includes all such changes and modifications as encompassed by the scope of the appended claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2010/057929 | 6/7/2010 | WO | 00 | 3/4/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/094812 | 8/26/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3894196 | Briskey | Jul 1975 | A |
5694474 | Ngo et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
20060087203 | Cho | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20090245553 | Parker | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090247810 | Parker et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20110264155 | Van den Heuvel et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 148 527 | Jan 2010 | EP |
2009101622 | Aug 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Database Medline [Online], US National Library of Medicine (NLM), Bethesda, MD, US; Mar. 1998, Snik AF, Beynon AJ, Mylanus EA, Van Der Pouw CT, Cremers CW: Binaural Applicaiton of the Bone-Anchored Heairng Aid; EXP-002616907; Database Accession No. NLM9525238, Abstract, & Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, vol. 107, No. 3 Mar. 31, 1998. |
Junseong Kim, Sanggyun Kim, and Change D. Yoo, A Novel Adaptive Crosstalk Cancellation Using Psychoacoustic Model for 3D Audio, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Apr. 15, 2007, pp. I-185-I-188. |
Abdulrahman Hagr, BAHA: Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid, International Journal of Health Sciences, Qassim University, vol. 1, No. 2, (Jul. 2007/JUMADA 11 1428N), pp. 265-276. |
P. Damaske, Head-Related Two-Channel Stereophony With Loudspeaker Reproduction, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Received Nov. 24, 1970, vol. 50, No. 4, (Part 2), pp. 1109-1115. |
Stefan Stenfelt and Richard L. Goode, Transmission Properties of Bone Conducted Sound: Measuremeents in Cadaver Heads, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118(4), Oct. 2005, pp. 2373-2391. |
Volkmar Hamacher, Ulrich Kornagel, Thomas Lotter, Henning Puder, Binaural Signal Processing in Hearing Aids: Technologies and Algorithms, Template for Book Projekt, pp. 1-35. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130156202 A1 | Jun 2013 | US |