The invention relates to a brush assembly. More specifically, the invention relates to a brush holder assembly that may be used in electrical devices and/or slip ring assemblies.
The purpose of a brush in an electrical device is to pass electrical current from a stationary contact to a moving contact surface, or vice versa. Brushes and brush holders are used in electrical devices such as electrical generators and electrical motors of all sizes. They are also used on slip ring assemblies, for example, slip ring assemblies on a rotating machine such as a rotating crane. Brushes in many electrical devices are blocks or other structures made of conductive material, such as graphite, carbon graphite, electrographite, metal graphite, or the like, that are adapted for continuous contact with a conductive surface to pass electrical current. A brush typically includes one or more electrical shunts or wires to provide an electrical current path from the brush to other structure. Typically a brush assembly provides for continuing contact between a stationary brush and a moving conductive surface, or vice versa. Over time, the brush will be reduced in size, or get shorter, for example as the contact surface of the brush wears down. It would be desirable to provide a brush assembly that allows for continuing good contact even as the brush wears down, and which enables quick, safe replacement of brushes.
In many designs, a brush box type brush holder is used to support the brush during operation. The brush and box are designed such that the brush can slide within the box to provide for continuing contact between the brush and the conductive surface contacted by the brush. During wear of a brush, fine particles and/or dust can be created, which can collect on nearby surfaces and the inside of the brush box. Such material can create deposits of brush material on the inside of the brush box that can restrict sliding movement of the brush within the box, which in turn can reduce the quality of the contact between the brush and the contact surface. It would be desirable to provide a brush assembly that allows for a reduction of such restriction in movement of the brush. Additionally, it would be desirable to provide a brush assembly which does not allow current to pass through the box to thereby avoid detrimental effects, such as electrical erosion of the surfaces of the box, or collection of deposits on the surface of the box, which can restrict movement of the brush within the box.
Further, typically such boxes include a back plate which is used to enable a spring to press the brush against a conductive surface. It would also be desirable to provide a brush assembly which can function without requiring a back plate.
In some instances a brush may become so worn as to require replacement. In some such cases, for example in power generation, it may be difficult or expensive to stop the motion of the moving conductive surface to replace the brush. However, removal of the brush while relative motion between the brush and the conductive surface is ongoing can create a risk of arcing between the brush and the conductive surface, or can create a risk of accidental short circuiting the flow of electricity in other components. It would be desirable to provide a brush assembly that allows for safe, easy removal and replacement of a worn brush without requiring an adjacent collector ring, commutator or other moving part to be stopped.
Some example embodiments relate to a brush holder and brush that can be readily removed from service without removing attachment hardware such as nuts or bolts. Additional example embodiments pertain to a brush holder that provides a mechanism for retaining a brush in the holder as the assembly is removed. In some such embodiments, the brush is contained within the brush holder assembly during removal, thereby providing for a more contained system that is easier to deal with and control during removal, thereby reducing the likelihood of accidental short circuiting of electrical current flow during a removal process. Additionally, in some such embodiments, the more contained system allows operations such as the removal of the brush assembly and/or the replacement or repair of a brush to be performed in a shorter period of time and with greater ease.
Other example embodiments relate to a brush holder including a replaceable contact system. Some example embodiments pertain to an assembly for attaching a brush spring while eliminating the need for back plate. Other example embodiments pertain to a brush holder using an insulation scheme to control the flow of current so that current does not pass through the brush box.
Some example embodiments pertain to a locking structure to ensure the holder stays locked in place. Several example locking structures include an over-center spring or tension-loaded device that does not release unless a force is applied to overcome the over-center force. Some example locking structures include a safety tab for interacting across a hinged or pivoting portion of a brush holder to prevent motion of the hinge or pivot unless a safety release device is used to release or move the safety tab.
Additional embodiments include features to prevent arcing between a brush and a conductive surface during removal of a brush while relative motion between the brush and the conductive surface continues. Some embodiments include mechanisms that allow for replacement of conductive and/or tension mechanisms within a brush holder structure when a brush wears out, simplifying the process of maintaining such elements. Some such embodiments provide for quick, unobstructed access to the inside of a brush box included in the assembly for cleaning and maintenance.
The following detailed description should be read with reference to the figures, in which like elements in different figures are numbered in like fashion. The figures, which are not necessarily to scale, depict selected embodiments and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. In some cases, the figures may be highly diagrammatic in nature. Examples of constructions, materials, dimensions, and manufacturing processes are provided for various elements, but are not intended to limit such elements to particular manufactures. Those skilled in the art will recognize that many of the examples provided have suitable alternatives that may be utilized.
As used herein, the terms “upper portion” and “lower portion” are intended as merely illustrative terms which may provide a frame of reference for explanations of the drawings and claims. Merely placing an element “upside-down” does not change the inventive concepts herein. Also as used herein, the term “box” does not refer to a particular structure or enclosure. As illustrated in several of the Figures, a box may include a first side, a second side, and a center portion attached between and at approximately right angles to the first and second sides. Often the term box will refer to a shielding or other piece of material that may surround another element on several sides. The term “adjacent” includes relatively close proximity, but does not imply contact between two elements which are adjacent one another.
The following detailed description is believed to describe a number of distinct inventions and inventive concepts. Each of the following inventions is illustrated herein as different aspects of one illustrative embodiment. The several inventions detailed below may be used in isolation from one another to accomplish a variety of tasks. Their inclusion in an individual example together should not be interpreted as requiring use of any one invention with any other inventive concept disclosed herein
The beam 14 is also hingedly attached to an upper beam 18. The hinged attachment may be at about pivot line Y. The upper beam 18 couples to an upper mount block 20, forming another hinge corresponding to pivot line Z. The upper mount block 20 engages the lower mount block 16 as better seen in
Also illustrated in
The various elements noted in
Several parts may also include non-conductive or conductive coatings, polishes, anti-corrosive coatings, or coatings such as Teflon or the like, which may inhibit accumulation of dirt and/or debris, inhibit corrosion, or provide a smooth or slippery surface. Several parts may also include surfaces that have been treated or finishing to inhibit accumulation of dirt and/or debris, inhibit corrosion, or provide a smooth or slippery surface.
For example, some embodiments may include one or more components or parts that include a surface that is electropolished. Electropolishing is a nonmechanical method of polishing metal surfaces that is actually the reverse of electroplating. It is an electro-chemical process that mechanically restructures the surface of a metal by expelling electrons from the exposed surface and causing a smoothing reaction. Surface metal is removed by anodic dissolution. This is achieved by making the object or portion of the brush holder assembly to be polished the anode in an electrolytic circuit, the cathode being of suitable material, for example, copper, carbon, or the like. The cathode is typically assembled to mirror the surface of the piece being polished. The electrode potential of the metal piece is altered, typically within a heated electrolyte bath. Suitable electrolytes are used, for example, polishing acids, for example, phosphoric, hydrofluoric, nitric, or sulfuric acids, or the like, or combinations thereof. The anode and cathode are typically submersed in a plating bath including the electrolytes, and an electrical current is passed through the system to dissolve material from the surface of the anode, and deposit material onto the cathode. The plating bath may be heated, as is generally known, and agitation of the system can be created, for example, through blowing air through the bath.
One aspect to the electropolishing process is the difference in current densities across the microscopic surface being treated. The current density is greatest at high points and lowest at the low points. The rate of the electrochemical reaction is directly proportional to the current densities. The increased current density at the raised, or high points causes metal to dissolve faster at these points and thus levels, or smoothens, the surface material.
In some embodiments, the process is so refined that removal of material can be controlled within the range of about 0.0001 inch to about 0.0005 inch. Some surfaces can be obtained that become non-particulating surfaces, for example, that are so smooth that at least some particles cannot be entrapped and adhere to the metal surface. Additionally, electropolishing can promote corrosion resistance by removing surface contaminants and promoting the formation of a uniform and protective passive oxide layer.
Such surface treatments or coatings can be particularly useful when applied to or used on the inner surfaces of the brush box 10 that may come into contact with the surfaces of the brush 12. It is desirable that the brush 12 is able to slide within the box 10 to be biased into contact with the surface 13 when the beam 14 is in the engaged configuration relative to a lower mount block 16. Such coatings or treatments may enhance and preserve the ability of the brush to slide within the box. For example, if the inner surface of the brush box is polished, coated, or treated as discussed above, in at least some embodiments, there will be less likelihood that particles and/or dust can collect on the surfaces on the inside of the brush box and create deposits that can restrict movement of the brush within the box. Additionally, the polished, coated or treated surfaces may be smoother or more lubricious, and therefore allow for better movement of the brush within the box.
In an illustrative use of the embodiments shown in
The brush spring 24 provides force that pushes the brush 12 toward the bottom edge of the brush box 10 as shown by arrow 11. The force provided by the brush spring 24 may be augmented by other biasing structures in some embodiments, while in other embodiments the brush spring 24 may by itself provide force to the brush 12 without other structure.
The brush 12 is shown extending past the bottom edge of the brush box 10. This enables a portion of the brush 12 to be supported by the brush box 10, while also allowing the brush 12 to engage and contact an adjacent conductive surface 13 without damaging the bottom of the brush box 10.
While the brush spring 24 continues to apply force to the brush 12, a brush catch mechanism (not shown in
The movement of the beam 14, safety catch 22 and upper beam 18 also exposes several additional aspects. The upper mount block 20 is shown to engage with the lower mount block 16 with a fork 36. The upper mount block 20 can also be attached to the lower mount block 16 using any suitable attachment mechanism, such as a bolt or screw, or the like, for example, as shown and discussed below with reference to
Referring to
To further control current passage, various elements including in particular the beam 14 and brush box 10 may in some embodiments be constructed of or coated with non-conductive materials. Also, in some embodiments, the brush spring 24 may likewise be coated or constructed to prevent current passage.
Actions to disengage the device, changing the configuration from that of
The brush is omitted in
The notch 57 is sized and shaped to receive the spring hook (not shown) in order to attach the brush spring 24 to the beam 14. By attaching the brush spring 24 to the beam 14, there is no need to supply a back plate to the device, as is often used in other brush holders. Such a construction allows the spring 24 to bias the brush 12 against a conductive surface 13, and allows the brush to slide up and down within the box.
In some embodiments, the attachment mechanism may be an easily removed or detached attachment apparatus, so that the brush spring 24 may be quickly and easily replaced. In other embodiments, the brush spring 24 and attachment mechanism may be more permanent, but may be provided such that the beam 14 is not damaged in removing the brush spring 24 and attachment mechanism. One example of such an embodiment would be to make the beam 14 of a material that does not melt or exhibit plastic deformation until a very high temperature, with the brush spring 24 and attachment mechanism of lower temperature deformation/melting point materials, so that heating in a furnace or by use of a torch could allow ready detachment of the brush spring 24 without damaging the beam 14. In still other embodiments, the brush spring 24 may be permanently attached to the beam 14, and the beam 14 may be reused only a few times until the brush spring 24 is no longer satisfactory for use, at which time the beam 14 with the brush spring 24 may be discarded.
In an alternative embodiment, a brush spring may be provided which, rather than coiling in on itself as the brush spring 24 of
Also illustrated in
A pivot pin 62 is also shown in
In other embodiments, the brush conductor 26 (not shown) may include an attachment apparatus which attaches to the beam 14 instead of a separate terminal, with the brush conductor 26 (not shown) also including a design allowing it to contact and conduct current to/from a conductor strap (also not shown).
Also illustrated quite clearly in
In some embodiments, the terminal 28 and/or the conductor strap 34 can include material or structure adapted or configured to provide a connecting force between the terminal and the conductor strap 34. For example, the terminal 28 and/or the conductor strap 34, or both, can include or be made of a spring material that is configured to bias one or more portions of the terminal 28 and the conductor strap 34 into electrical connection with each other when the mounting bracket is in an engaged position relative to a mount block. For example, in the embodiment shown, the terminal 28 includes two leafs 70 that extend outward from the terminal to provide a generally u-shaped structure. The conductor strap 34 also includes two leafs 72 that form a generally u-shaped structure. The leafs 70, or portions thereof, can be made of or include a portion of which is a spring material, such as a spring polymer, spring metal, for example spring copper or the like. The leafs 70 can be shaped or configured such that at least a portion of the space between the leafs 70 is smaller than the distance between the outer surfaces of the leafs 72 of the conductor strap 34. Due to the shape, and the use of a spring material, when the leafs 70 come into contact with the leafs 72, the leafs 70 are spread apart slightly to engage the leafs 72. However, due to the spring nature of the leafs 70, they bias themselves toward the leafs 72 to provide a connecting force between the terminal and the conductor strap 34. It should be understood that in other embodiments, only one leaf 70 could be used, or more than two leafs 70 could be used, and a similar biasing force can be created. It should also be understood that the leafs 72 of the conductor strap 34 could also be made of a spring material and be adapted or configured to provide an outward biasing force against the leafs of the terminal. In yet other embodiments, the leafs 70 of the terminal could be adapted and configured to fit within the leafs 72 of the conductor strap 34, and to provide an outward biasing force, and/or the leafs 72 of the conductor strap 34 could be adapted and configured to provide an inward biasing force.
In one embodiment, the lock pin 63 (
The removal tool 80 also includes a release tab 84. The release tab 84 may be a spring-loaded device which couples with a spring loaded catch pin 92 (
Also illustrated is a safety tab release 86 including a ledge groove 88 and a leading edge 90. Referring now to both
In one embodiment, the leading edge 90 (
Also shown in
The terminal 28 is adapted to slide into place on a beam 14. Referring to
The conductor receiver 100 may be sized or otherwise adapted to provide good contact with a brush conductor 26 (
A brush catch 110 is engaged with a brush catch spring 112 in the brush catch notch 56. A brush release tab 114 is a part of the lower mount block 16. The brush release tab 114 may be created or attached by any suitable method. The guide tab 116 is a part of the beam 14 as further illustrated, for example, in
In other embodiments, other brush catch mechanisms may also be used to prevent the brush 12 from falling out of the bottom of the brush box 10. For example, referring to
As shown in
For some embodiments, when the hinge Y is in the configuration as shown in
The lower mount block 16 may include a fork seat 142 for receiving a fork of an upper mount block such as the upper mount block 20 as shown in
The lower mount block 16 may be mounted on any number of surfaces. Of particular use may be the fact that lower mount block 16 can be mounted onto a flat surface. This means that the lower mount block 16 can be retro-fitted onto existing brush riggings. For example, an existing rigging may include a number of bolts and other elements, which may be removed and/or cut off of the existing rigging, leaving behind a flat surface. The lower mount block 16 may then be mounted onto the remaining flat surface by, for example, welding it into place. Alternatively, any remaining flat surface may be fitted with two bolts, properly placed, to which the lower mount block 16 may be attached. Because the present embodiment can be separated into multiple pieces, with the lower mount block 16 being the only portion that must be “fixed” to a location, attachment steps are simplified, because other parts can be set aside until the lower mount block 16 is placed and secured.
In some other embodiments, additional structures 185, such as one or more Belleville washers, disc springs, or the like, can be disposed about the bolt 183 between the upper mount block 20 and the head of the bolt 183 to provide a degree of separation force between the upper mount block 20 and the bolt head. The bolt can then be tightened down against the additional structures 185, such as Belleville washers, disc springs, or the like, such that the additional structures 185 provide a predetermined level of force against the upper mount block 20. In such embodiments, when the additional “over center” force is applied to force the holder into an engaged position (for example, the beam 132 and removal receiver 134 into the configuration shown in
In
From
While the above embodiments are often described in terms of removing or replacing a brush, in some embodiments the primary use of these devices may be to allow a maintenance worker to repair, monitor or otherwise service a commutator, collector ring, or other conductive surface which a brush is designed to engage. For example, not only do brushes wear down over time, but commutators engaged by brushes also exhibit degradation due to wear. It may be useful to easily or reversibly disengage a brush from a commutator to determine the extent of wear and perform repairs.
Additionally, different embodiments of the invention can be suited and sized for use in the particular electrical device in which they are to be incorporated. For example, some embodiments are suited and sized for use in large industrial electrical generators or motors. Some embodiments are particularly well suited and sized for use in power plants, for example power plants having a capacity in the range of about 0.5 to about 900 megawatts, and in some embodiments, power plants having a capacity in the range of about 300 or greater. It should be recognized, however, that the invention is not limited to use in such embodiments.
Those skilled in the art will recognize that the present invention may be manifested in a variety of forms other than the specific embodiments described and contemplated herein. Accordingly, departures in form and detail may be made without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention as described in the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/023,933, filed Sep. 11, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/464,462, filed May 4, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,546,993, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/180,004, filed Jul. 11, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,179,014 which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/886,979, filed Sep. 21, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,990,018, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/652,533, filed Jan. 5, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,880,363, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/191,783, filed on Aug. 14, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,768,174; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/535,878, filed on Sep. 27, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,417,354, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/378,155, filed on Mar. 17, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,122,935; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/172,315, filed Jun. 30, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,141,906; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/322,957, filed Dec. 18, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,034,430; which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/342,175, filed Dec. 18, 2001, all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
629418 | Baylis | Jul 1899 | A |
985951 | Sparks | Mar 1911 | A |
1132304 | Cunningham | Mar 1915 | A |
1355254 | Parsons | Oct 1920 | A |
1366404 | MacDougall | Jan 1921 | A |
1488574 | Wagner | Apr 1924 | A |
1488575 | Wagner | Apr 1924 | A |
2194620 | Sekyra | Mar 1940 | A |
2840734 | Nottelmann et al. | Sep 1956 | A |
2840732 | Nottelmann et al. | Jun 1958 | A |
3316431 | Manoni | Apr 1967 | A |
3346431 | Hammonds | Oct 1967 | A |
3387155 | Krulls | Jun 1968 | A |
3432708 | Bissett | Mar 1969 | A |
3445705 | Irwin | May 1969 | A |
3466481 | Sckerl | Sep 1969 | A |
3482135 | Hurlin | Dec 1969 | A |
3521102 | Kumar | Jul 1970 | A |
3590298 | Hudak | Jun 1971 | A |
3656018 | Maher | Apr 1972 | A |
3710160 | Voglesonger | Jan 1973 | A |
3710478 | Krulls | Jan 1973 | A |
3842302 | Apostoleris | Oct 1974 | A |
3863085 | Shapiro et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
3864803 | Ohmstedt et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3867659 | Seaburg et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3898492 | Vassos et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
3902088 | Guglielmo | Aug 1975 | A |
3967148 | Walsh | Jun 1976 | A |
3968391 | Blank | Jul 1976 | A |
3983432 | Rankin | Sep 1976 | A |
4074162 | Parzych | Feb 1978 | A |
4082975 | Azarov et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4166968 | Prittie | Sep 1979 | A |
4296346 | Ooki et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4297605 | Tak | Oct 1981 | A |
4329611 | Ohmstedt et al. | May 1982 | A |
4329612 | Averill | May 1982 | A |
4340832 | Cheetham | Jul 1982 | A |
4354128 | Chew et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4355254 | Oki et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4366404 | Ziegler | Dec 1982 | A |
4409508 | Ooki et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4420705 | Kimberlin | Dec 1983 | A |
4513395 | Henry et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4513495 | Kimberlin | Apr 1985 | A |
4633552 | Eriksson | Jan 1987 | A |
4663552 | Ohmstedt | May 1987 | A |
4843274 | Paisley | Jun 1989 | A |
5043619 | Kartman | Aug 1991 | A |
5159222 | Southall | Oct 1992 | A |
5414319 | Nowicki et al. | May 1995 | A |
5444320 | Clarke et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5608280 | Tamemoto et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5648695 | Yamaguchi et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5731650 | Scheucher | Mar 1998 | A |
5819092 | Ferguson et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5939812 | Wetzel | Aug 1999 | A |
5949175 | Cummins | Sep 1999 | A |
6087754 | Berger | Jul 2000 | A |
6124652 | Karasa | Sep 2000 | A |
6133665 | Prell et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6169351 | Bohart | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6246145 | Morimoto | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246146 | Schiller | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6255955 | Blaettner | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6326716 | Niimi | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6356004 | Porter et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6515989 | Ronneke | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6600744 | Carr et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6618355 | Gulliford et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6636502 | Lager et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6680556 | Menz | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6738752 | Sako et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6824577 | Deshpande | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6960922 | Klaar | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7034430 | Custforth | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7053516 | Yu | May 2006 | B2 |
7122935 | Custforth | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7141906 | Custforth | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7218028 | Annis et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7365470 | Eger et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7417354 | Cutsforth | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7564160 | Cutsforth et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7608970 | Eger et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7768174 | Cutsforth et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7880362 | Cutsforth et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7880363 | Cutsforth et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7990018 | Cutsforth et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8049392 | Quail et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8179014 | Cutsforth et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8546993 | Cutsforth et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
20030151328 | Cutsforth et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030173856 | Raye et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20050156477 | Bocka | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060112584 | Jones | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060119211 | Annis et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20100133950 | Custforth et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
847126 | Jun 1998 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Plaintiff Cutsforth, Inc.'s Complaint filed May 17, 2012 in Case No. 0:12-CV-01200 SRN-JSM in Dist. Court of MN. |
Wabtec's Answer and Counterclaims filed Jul. 6, 2012 in Case No. 0:12-CV-01200 SRN-JSM in Dist. Court of MN. |
Fulmer's Answer and Counterclaims filed Jul. 6, 2012 in Case No. 0:12-CV-01200 SRN-JSM in Dist. Court of MN. |
Plaintiff Cutsforth, Inc.'s Amended Complaint filed Jul. 13, 2012 in Case No. 0:12-CV-01200 SRN-JSM in Dist. Court of MN. |
Wabtec's Answer and Counterclaims to Cutsforth's Amended Complaint filed Jul. 27, 2012 in Case No. 0:12-CV-01200 SRN-JSM in Dist. Court of MN. |
Fulmer's Answer and Counterclaims to Cutsforth's Amended Complaint filed Jul. 27, 2012 in Case No. 0:12-CV-01200 SRN-JSM in Dist. Court of MN. |
Plaintiff Cutsforth, Inc.'s Answer to Counterclaims of Fulmer Company, LLC filed Jul. 30, 2012 in Case No. 0:12-CV-01200 SRN-JSM in Dist. Court of MN. |
Plaintiff Cutsforth, Inc.'s Answer to Counterclaims of Wabtec filed Jul. 30, 2012 in Case No. 0:12-CV-01200 SRN-JSM in Dist. Court of MN. |
Plaintiff Cutsforth, Inc.'s Answer to Defendants' First Set of Interrogatories filed Sep. 24, 2012 in Case No. 0:12-CV-01200 SRN-JSM in Dist. Court of MN. |
Plaintiff Cutsforth, Inc.'s Second Amended Complaint filed Sep. 25, 2012 in Case No. 0:12-CV-01200 SRN-JSM in Dist. Court of MN. |
Lemm's Answer and Counterclaims to Cutsforth's Second Amended Complaint filed Oct. 9, 2012 in Case No. 0:12-CV-01200 SRN-JSM in Dist. Court of MN. |
Motivepower's Answer and Counterclaims to Cutsforth's Second Amended Complaint filed Oct. 9, 2012 in Case No. 0:12-CV-01200 SRN-JSM in Dist. Court of MN. |
Wabtec's Answer and Counterclaims to Cutsforth's Second Amended Complaint filed Oct. 9, 2012 in Case No. 0:12-CV-01200 SRN-JSM in Dist. Court of MN. |
Plaintiff Cutsforth, Inc.'s Answer to Amended Counterclaims of Fulmer Company, LLC filed Oct. 26, 2012 in Case No. 0:12-CV-01200 SRN-JSM in Dist. Court of MN. |
Plaintiff Cutsforth, Inc.'s Answer to Counterclaims of Motivepower, Inc. filed Oct. 26, 2012 in Case No. 0:12-CV-01200 SRN-JSM in Dist. Court of MN. |
Plaintiff Cutsforth, Inc.'s Answer to Wabtec's Amended Counterclaims filed Oct. 26, 2012 in Case No. 0:12-CV-01200 SRN-JSM in Dist. Court of MN. |
Plaintiff Cutsforth, Inc.'s Memorandum in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss Inequitable Conduct Pleadings filed Oct. 26, 2012 in Case No. 0:12-CV-01200 SRN-JSM in Dist. Court of MN. |
Declaration of Joseph A. Herriges in Support of Plaintiff Cutsforth, Inc.'s Memorandum of Law in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss Inequitable Conduct Pleadings filed Oct. 26, 2012 in Case No. 0:12-CV-01200 SRN-JSM in Dist. Court of MN. |
Plaintiff Cutsforth, Inc.'s First Supplemental Response to Defendants' First Set of Interrogatories filed Oct. 26, 2012 in Case No. 0:12-CV-01200 SRN-JSM in Dist. Court of MN. |
Defendant's Preliminary Non-Infringement, Unenforceability and Invalidity Contentions filed Nov. 9, 2012 in Case No. 0:12-CV-01200 SRN-JSM in Dist. Court of MN. |
Defendants' Opposition to Motion to Dismiss filed Nov. 16, 2012 in Case No. 0:12-CV-01200 SRN-JSM in Dist. Court of MN. |
Declaration of Jason A. Engel in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Motion to Dismiss filed Nov. 16, 2012 in Case No. 0:12-CV-01200 SRN-JSM in Dist. Court of MN. |
Plaintiff Cutsforth, Inc.'s Reply Memorandum in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss Inequitable Conduct Pleadings (Redacted Version) filed Dec. 3, 2012 in Case No. 0:12-CV-01200 SRN-JSM in Dist. Court of MN. |
Plaintiff Cutsforth, Inc.'s Response to Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions filed Dec. 21, 2012, in Case No. 0:12-CV-01200 SRN-JSM in Dist. Court of MN. |
Transcript of Hearing on Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss on Jan. 15, 2013 in Case No. 0:12-CV-01200 SRN-JSM in Dist. Court of MN. |
Joint Claim Construction Statement filed May 3, 2013 in Case No. 0:12-CV-01200 SRN-JSM in Dist. Court of MN. |
Defendants' Unenforceability and Invalidity Contentions filed May 8, 2013 in Case No. 0:12-CV-01200 SRN-JSM in Dist. Court of MN. |
Plaintiff Cutsforth, Inc.'s Final Infringement Contentions filed May 10, 2013 in Case No. 0:12-CV-01200 SRN-JSM in Dist. Court of MN. |
Memorandum Opinion and Order filed Jun. 6, 2013 in Case No. 0:12-CV-01200 SRN-JSM in Dist. Court of MN. |
Documents depicting brush holder designs, sent by applicant on Apr. 5, 2002 (3 pgs). |
Documents depicting various processes of electropolishing, sent by applicant on Dec. 17, 2002 (3 pgs). |
Cutsforth Preliminfringement Contentions w-Exs A-E Oct. 5, 2012 filed in Case No. 0:12-cv-01200 in Dist. Court of MN. |
Defs Exs 1-5 to Non-Infringe Contentions Nov. 9, 2012 filed in Case No. 0-12-cv-01200 in Dist. Court of MN. |
Defs Exs A-E to Invalidity Contents Nov. 9, 2012 filed in Case No. 0:12-cv-01200 in Dist. Court of MN. |
Defs Non-Infringe-Invalidity Contentions Nov. 9, 2012 filed in Case No. 0:12-cv-1200 in Dist. Court of MN. |
Cutsforth Resp to Defs Invalidity Contentions Dec. 21, 2012 filed in Case No. 0:12-cv-01200 in Dist. Court of MN. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,122,935 filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on May 6, 2013. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,141,906 filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on May 6, 2013. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,417,354 filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on May 6, 2013. |
Defendant's Unenforceability and Invalidity Contentions, filed May 10, 2013 in Case No. 0:12-CV-01200-SRN-JSM in Dist. Court of MN. |
Joint Claim Construction Statement, filed May 3, 2013 in Case No. 0:12-CV-01200-SRN-JSM in Dist. Court of MN. |
Patent Owner Cutsforth, Inc.'s Preliminary Response filed Aug. 6, 2013 in Case IPR2013-00267 for Patent 7,122,935. |
Decision Institution of Inter Partes Review dated Nov. 1, 2013 for Case IPR2013-00267 for Patent 7,122,935. |
General Electric Company “Collector and Carbon Brush Rigging Installation, Operation and Maintenance” (Revised May 2009). |
Ohmstedt, et al. “Maintaining Carbon-Brush Collectors” Power, Jun. (1976). |
Clyde V. Maughan, “Maintaining Carbon-Brush Collectors” Combined Cycle Journal pp. 98-104 (2010). |
Jeff D. Koenitzer, P.E., “Brushholders and the Performance of Carbon Brushes” Electrical Apparatus Service Association, Inc., Tech Note No. 22 (2003). |
GE Industrial & Power Systems, “Collectors, Brush Rigging, Cartridge Brush Holders and Brushes”, revised Oct. 1992, pp. 1-30. |
GE Power Systems, “Brush Rigging and Collector Rings”, Revised Jul. 1994, pp. 1-8. |
The New Oxford American Dictionary (Oxford University Press 2001). |
Declaration of Thomas A. Keim, Sc.D., dated Feb. 6, 2014, in Case IPR2013-00267 for Patent 7,122,935. |
Declaration of Dustin Cutsforth, dated Feb. 6, 2014, in Case IPR2013-00267 for Patent 7,122,935. |
Patent Owner Cutsforth, Inc.'s Response dated Feb. 6, 2014 in Case IPR2013-00267 for Patent 7,122,935. |
Supplemental Declaration of Thomas A. Keim, Sc.D, dated Feb. 28, 2014 in Case IPR2013-00267 for Patent 7,122,935. |
Petitioners Reply to Patent Owner's Response dated May 6, 2014 for Case IPR2013-00267 for Patent 7,122,935. |
Final Written Decision entered Oct. 30, 2014 in Case IPR2013-00267 for Patent 7,122,935. |
Patent Owner Cutsforth, Inc.'s Preliminary Response filed Aug. 6, 2013 in Case IPR2013-00268 for Patent 7,141,906. |
Decision Institution of Inter Partes Review dated Nov. 1, 2013 for Case IPR2013-00268 for Patent 7,141,906. |
Roark, et al. “Formulas for Stress and Strain” Fifth Edition (1975) pp. 89-205. |
Gere, et al. “Mechanics of Materials” Second Edition (1984) pp. 1-26. |
Webster's Third New International Dictionary of the English Language Unabridged (1961) 6 pages. |
Oxford Dictionary of Mechanical Engineering (2013) 4 pages. |
Declaration of Thomas A. Keim, Sc.D., dated Feb. 6, 2014, in Case IPR2013-00268 for Patent 7,141,906. |
Patent Owner Cutsforth, Inc.'s Motion to Amend U.S. Pat. No. 7,141,906 Under 35 U.S.C. Section 316 and 37 CFR Section 42.121 dated Feb. 6, 2014, in Case IPR2013-00268 for Patent 7,141,906. |
Patent Owner Cutsforth, Inc.'s Response filed Feb. 6, 2014 in Case IPR2013-00268 for Patent 7,141,906. |
Decision on Motion to Amend Claims entered Feb. 18, 2014 in Case IPR2013-00268 for Patent 7,141,906. |
Supplemental Declaration of Thomas A. Keim, Sc.D, dated Feb. 28, 2014 in Case IPR2013-00268 for Patent 7,141,906. |
Petitioners Reply to Patent Owner's Response dated May 6, 2014 for Case IPR2013-00268 for Patent 7,141,906. |
Final Written Decision entered Oct. 30, 2014 in Case IPR2013-00268 for Patent 7,141,906. |
Patent Owner Cutsforth, Inc.'s Preliminary Response filed Aug. 6, 2013 in Case IPR2013-00270 for Patent 7,417,354. |
Decision Institution of Inter Partes Review entered Nov. 1, 2013 for Case IPR2013-00270 for Patent 7,417,354. |
The American Heritage Dictionary of The English Language Fourth Edition, Houghton Mifflin Company (2000) 4 pages. |
Webster's Third New International Dictionary of the English Language Unabridged (1993) 3 pages. |
Declaration of Thomas A. Keim, Sc.D., dated Feb. 6, 2014, in Case IPR2013-00270 for Patent 7,417,354. |
Declaration of Dustin Cutsforth, dated Feb. 6, 2014, in Case IPR2013-00270 for Patent 7,417,354. |
Patent Owner Cutsforth, Inc.'s Motion to Amend U.S. Pat. No. 7,417,354 Under 35 U.S.C. Section 316 and 37 CFR Section 42.121 dated Feb. 6, 2014, in Case IPR2013-00270 for Patent 7,417,354. |
Patent Owner Cutsforth, Inc.'s Response dated Feb. 6, 2014 in Case IPR2013-00270 for Patent 7,417,354. |
Decision on Motion to Amend Claims entered Feb. 18, 2014 in Case IPR2013-00270 for Patent 7,417,354. |
Supplemental Declaration of Thomas A. Keim, Sc.D, dated Feb. 28, 2014 in Case IPR2013-00270 for Patent 7,417,354. |
Petitioners Reply to Patent Owner's Response dated May 6, 2014 for Case IPR2013-00270 for Patent 7,417,354. |
Final Written Decision entered Oct. 30, 2014 in Case IPR2013-00270 for Patent 7,417,354. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,179,014 filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on May 8, 2013. |
Patent Owner Cutsforth, Inc.'s Preliminary Response filed Aug. 8, 2013 in Case IPR2013-00272 for Patent 8,179,014. |
Decision Institution of Inter Partes Review entered Nov. 1, 2013 for Case IPR2013-00272 for Patent 8,179,014. |
Parslow, “Improved Safety of Carbon-Brush Collector Maintenance on Turbine-Generators Retrofitted With On-Line, Removable Plug-In Brush Holders” Energy-Tech.com pp. 1-5 (Jun. 2010). |
Clyde Maughan, “Recent Publications” retrieved from Internet: http://home.earthlink.net/˜theclyde/Publications.html retrieved on Feb. 1, 2014 (Dec. 17, 2013). |
Clyde V. Maughan, P.E. “Carbon Brush Collector Maintenance on Turbine-Generators” pp. 57-62 IEEE (2007). |
Declaration of Thomas A. Keim, Sc.D., dated Feb. 6, 2014, in Case IPR2013-00272 for Patent 8,179,014. |
Declaration of Dustin Cutsforth, dated Feb. 6, 2014, in Case IPR2013-00272 for Patent 8,179,014. |
Patent Owner Cutsforth, Inc.'s Motion to Amend U.S. Pat. No. 8,179,014 Under 35 U.S.C. Section 316 and 37 CFR Section 42.121 dated Feb. 6, 2014, in Case IPR2013-00272 for Patent 8,179,014. |
Patent Owner Cutsforth, Inc.'s Response dated Feb. 6, 2014 in Case IPR2013-00272 for Patent 8,179,014. |
Decision on Motion to Amend Claims entered Feb. 18, 2014 in Case IPR2013-00272 for Patent 8,179,014. |
Supplemental Declaration of Thomas A. Keim, Sc.D, dated Feb. 28, 2014 in Case IPR2013-00272 for Patent 8,179,014. |
Petitioners Reply to Patent Owner's Response dated May 6, 2014 for Case IPR2013-00272 for Patent 8,179,014. |
Final Written Decision entered Oct. 30, 2014 in Case IPR2013-00272 for Patent 8,179,014. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,990,018 filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on May 8, 2013. |
U.S. Examiner Karl Tamai, USPTO Final Office Action, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/096,990, mailed Dec. 6, 2007, 10 pages. |
Patent Owner Cutsforth, Inc.'s Preliminary Response filed Aug. 8, 2013 in Case IPR2013-00274 for Patent 7,990,018. |
Decision Institution of Inter Partes Review entered Nov. 1, 2013 for Case IPR2013-00274 for Patent 7,990,018. |
Patent Owner Cutsforth, Inc.'s Response dated Feb. 6, 2014 in Case IPR2013-00274 for Patent 7,990,018. |
Declaration of Thomas A. Keim, Sc.D., dated Feb. 6, 2014, in Case IPR2013-00274 for Patent 7,990,018. |
Declaration of Dustin Cutsforth, dated Feb. 6, 2014, in Case IPR2013-00274 for Patent 7,990,018. |
Supplemental Declaration of Thomas A. Keim, Sc.D, dated Feb. 28, 2014 in Case IPR2013-00274 for Patent 7,990,018. |
Petitioners Reply to Patent Owner's Response dated May 6, 2014 for Case IPR2013-00274 for Patent 7,990,018. |
Final Written Decision entered Oct. 30, 2014 in Case IPR2013-00274 for Patent 7,990,018. |
R. D. Hall and R. P. Roberge, “Carbon Brush Performance on Slip Rings”, Proc. Conf. Rec. Annu. Pulp Paper Ind. Tech. Conf., pp. 1-6 (2010). |
The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language 3rd Ed., Houghton Mifflin Company (1996). |
Claim Chart of U.S. Pat. No. 7,122,935, filed as Exhibit 2014 with Patent Owner Cutsforth, Inc.'s Response dated Feb. 6, 2014 in Case IPR2013-00267 for U.S. Pat. No. 7,122,935. |
Claim Chart of U.S. Pat. No. 7,417,354, filed as Exhibit 2014 with Patent Owner Cutsforth, Inc.'s Response dated Feb. 6, 2014 in Case IPR2013-00270 for U.S. Pat. No. 7,417,354. |
Claim Chart of U.S. Pat. No. 8,179,014, filed as Exhibit 2014 with Patent Owner Cutsforth, Inc.'s Response dated Feb. 6, 2014 in Case IPR2013-00272 for U.S. Pat. No. 8,179,014. |
Claim Chart of U.S. Pat. No. 7,990,018, filed as Exhibit 2017 with Patent Owner Cutsforth, Inc.'s Response dated Feb. 6, 2014 in Case IPR2013-00274 for U.S. Pat. No. 7,990,018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150137656 A1 | May 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60342175 | Dec 2001 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11378155 | Mar 2006 | US |
Child | 11535878 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14023933 | Sep 2013 | US |
Child | 14607522 | US | |
Parent | 13464462 | May 2012 | US |
Child | 14023933 | US | |
Parent | 13180004 | Jul 2011 | US |
Child | 13464462 | US | |
Parent | 12886979 | Sep 2010 | US |
Child | 13180004 | US | |
Parent | 12652533 | Jan 2010 | US |
Child | 12886979 | US | |
Parent | 12191783 | Aug 2008 | US |
Child | 12652533 | US | |
Parent | 11535878 | Sep 2006 | US |
Child | 12191783 | US | |
Parent | 11172315 | Jun 2005 | US |
Child | 11378155 | US | |
Parent | 10322957 | Dec 2002 | US |
Child | 11172315 | US |