The present invention relates to buoyancy devices for very deep water applications and methods for producing such buoyancy devices.
Most underwater equipment (in particular equipment for offshore exploration and oil and natural gas production, e.g. risers) and all underwater vehicles require the use of buoyancy systems to impart positive buoyancy properties to the underwater equipment or vehicle.
The use of a buoyant pourable material, called syntactic foam, is known for underwater vehicles, e.g. remotely operated vehicles (ROV), and for risers which convey oil and/or natural gas from the seabed to the surface treatment plants, such as for example rigs, FPSO (floating production, storage and offloading) units, floating rigs or floating installation means etc.
Syntactic foam is a mixture of epoxy resin, polyester or other polymers with hollow glass micro-spheres having diameter of 15 μm . . . 136 μm and variable thickness of 1 μm . . . 2 μm and/or with larger size hollow glass macro-spheres, which may have diameters from a few millimeters to a few tens of millimeters. The syntactic foam may be formed into complex shapes and solidified, e.g. by means of curing, to form a solid block.
The ratio between total dry weight of the buoyant material (including all its components) and the weight of an equal volume of seawater is a parameter named “relative density”. The lower the numeric value of the relative density, the higher is the buoyancy efficiency of the syntactic foam, i.e. the ratio between the net buoyancy of the buoyant material and the weight of an equal volume of seawater, where the net buoyancy corresponds to the difference between the weight of the buoyant material in water and its dry weight.
As the water depth, and consequently the hydrostatic pressure to which the buoyant material is subjected, increases, the syntactic foam must have an increasingly greater compressive strength, which can be achieved, within given limits, by increasing the ratio between wall thickness and diameter of the glass spheres. An increase of weight and a decrease of the buoyancy efficiency results.
Taking geometric imperfections, the material of the glass micro-spheres and the actual conditions of use into account, buoyant materials made of syntactic foam with sufficient compressive strength for water depth of up to 3000 meters could ideally achieve a limit buoyancy efficiency of about 0.5. The manufacturers of syntactic foam for water depths of up to 2500 m-3000 m declare relative density values of about 0.6.
In deeper water, the more efficient, lighter syntactic foams would be crushed and the use of heavier syntactic foams, which are more pressure-resistant, would imply a considerable increase of volume and costs of the buoyant material for a given buoyancy.
For example, at a depth of 6000 meters, a typical work class ROV would require a volume of syntactic foam in the order of twice the size of the buoyant volume required at a depth of 3000 meters.
The use of macro-spheres of different materials has been experimented with the two-fold objective of reducing the specific weight of the buoyant body and of increasing its hydrostatic compressive strength at the same time.
WO 99/44881 describes an example of aluminum macro-sphere having a diameter of 240 mm and a wall thickness of 4 mm, produced by forging and thermally treating two semi-spherical caps and by gluing the semi-spherical caps by means of cyanoacrylate adhesive.
Despite the excellent theoretical buoyancy efficiency given by the lightness of the material and the high theoretical ratio between outer diameter and wall thickness of the forged and glued sphere, its compressive strength is compromised, in practice, by the shape and material discontinuity at the joint line and by the shape imperfections of the forged semi-spherical caps, as well as by the unsuitability of the material properties, in particular the yield strength of aluminum. For these reasons, the metal macro-sphere suggested in WO 99/44881 has a critical load (buckling strength) and a maximum yield strength which are not always satisfactory for hydrostatic pressures in deep seawater.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,598,106 describes the use of macro-spheres made of ceramic material inserted in a syntactic foam housing, in which the cavities of the housing which receive the spheres allow the introduction of water which applies the hydrostatic pressure directly on the spheres.
The production of hollow spheres of ceramic material and the use of hollow ceramic spheres in buoyancy bodies of a remotely operated underwater vehicle (ROV) are described in scientific literature,
The first of the two studies reports a sensitivity of ceramic to sustained pressure and to work cycles (cyclic fatigue life), which can cause unexpected failures at load values lower than the theoretical values.
Thus, it is the object of the invention to provide buoyancy systems for very deep water (deeper than 3000 m) which have a satisfactory buoyancy efficiency, preferably greater than 0.5, and which can better sustain the hydrostatic working pressure (p>300 bar).
It is a particular object of the invention to provide buoyancy systems with one or more hollow macro-spheres resistant to sustained cyclic and/or permanent stresses, as well as impacts.
It is a further object of the invention to provide buoyancy systems with one or more hollow macro-spheres made of light, but ductile material with a high yield strength to better sustain the maximum hydrostatic pressures.
It is a further particular object of the invention to provide buoyancy systems with one or more hollow micro-spheres made of metal material having a high geometric uniformity and material homogeneity to avoid problems of instability induced by imperfections.
These and other objects are achieved by means of a buoyancy device comprising:
By virtue of the use of nano-crystalline metal material as structural material of the microscopic buoyancy spheres, it is possible to increase the yield strength, ductility and tenacity of the spherical shell for a given weight, thus increasing the maximum load (maximum hydrostatic pressure strength) of the buoyancy spheres for a given buoyancy efficiency.
In response to extreme stresses of the spherical shell, the nano-particle size allows a crystal growth with consequent increase of the particle size which permits the activation of more conventional deformation mechanisms, such as the multiplication and the accumulation of the intragranular dislocations, which favor strain hardening, greater tenacity and high plastic deformations.
According to an aspect of the invention, the spherical shell is obtained by means of deposition of metal nano-particles along a predetermined spherical geometry.
A two-fold technical effect is achieved by obtaining the spherical shell by deposition of metal nano-particles along a predetermined spherical geometry. The deposition of nano-particles allows a particle-by-particle construction of the spherical cap following precisely the ideal spherical geometry to sustain hydrostatic pressure and considerably reducing geometric imperfections. On the other hand, the same particle-by-particle construction allows to obtain the crystalline structure with nanometric grain size and high mechanical property homogeneity of the metal material in all the zones of the spherical shell.
This allows to obtain metal macro-spheres with high buoyancy efficiency (low relative density) which have a high maximum load value (as a function of the yield strength of the material) and a high critical load value (buckling as a function of the modulus of elasticity and of the geometric and material imperfections).
Expressed in simplified formulas which can be used for the approximate design of the hollow macro-spheres, the compressive stress limit (maximum load) and critical pressure (critical load) values are:
σc=(p*r)/(2*t)≤σlim/SF
pcr=K*E*t2/r2
where:
The present invention provides buoyancy systems with metal macro-spheres, in which the σc and pcr values are both increased for a given buoyancy, with respect to the prior art. This allows to use the buoyancy systems at depths from 4500 m to 6000 m with corresponding hydrostatic pressures from about 450 bar to 600 bar.
According to an aspect of the invention, the spherical shell constitutes a supporting layer of a multilayer spherical wall having a base layer with a deposition surface on which the spherical shell is formed by means of electrodeposition.
The base layer may be a thin, light layer with very high geometric accuracy but without particular mechanical strength, which ensures the geometric accuracy during particle-by-particle construction of the spherical shell by means of electrodeposition.
The spherical shell is preferably made of aluminum or aluminum alloy, e.g. aluminum-manganese (Al—Mn) alloy. Aluminum and its alloys are light, may be constructed in controlled manner by means of deposition of nano-particles with expectable and repeatable results with regard to the crystalline structure and the grain size, as described for example in Electrodeposited Al—Mn alloys with microcrystalline, nanocrystalline, amorphous and nano-quasicrystalline structures, S. Y. Ruan and C. A. Schuh, Acta Mater 57,3810(2009), Towards electroformed nonstructured aluminium alloys with high strength and ductility, Schuh A. C. Ruan S., MIT, 2011.
More in general, in addition to electrodeposition, suitable procedures for nano-particle deposition or for atomic or molecular deposition may include physical vapor deposition (PVD), chemical vapor deposition (CVD) and powder deposition, ensuring however a nano-particle size of the deposited powder.
Examples of electrodeposition procedures include electroplating and electrophoretic deposition.
Examples of physical vapor deposition (PVD) are thermal evaporation deposition (which exploits the Joule effect), electron beam physical vapor deposition (which vaporizes the material to be deposited by means of an electron beam), sputtering (in which the material to be deposited is eroded by plasma), arc evaporation deposition (in which the evaporation is produced by an electric discharge directed onto the material), pulsed laser deposition (with vaporization of the material by means of high-power laser). The resulting structure of the spherical shell is constructed atom-by-atom (atomic or molecular deposition).
Examples of procedures of powder deposition with nano-particle sizes are welded powder deposition, laser powder deposition, powder bed 3D printing.
According to a further aspect of the invention, the nano-crystalline metal of the spherical shell has a particle size without an amorphous phase (or with an amorphous phase lower than 3% Vol), and preferably also substantially unimodal. Such a property can be easily verified by means of electronic microscopy of specimens on the outer surface of the spherical shell.
A possible measure to avoid the formation of an amorphous phase in metal alloys, in particular aluminum alloys, constructed by means of electrodeposition is the application of pulsed current PC instead of a constant direct current DC at the anode and cathode poles in the electrolytic bath. Such processes are known and industrially used to obtain coatings with given surface properties (hardness etc.), while the present invention envisages its use for the targeted construction of the spherical shell as supporting and self-supporting structure of the underwater buoyancy device.
In particular, the electrodeposition of the spherical shell with the application of pulsed current leads to a series of structural advantages which make the aluminum alloy more ductile:
Scientific confirmation and possible hypotheses on the reasons for these effects on the crystalline morphology of the material are given in scientific literature, e.g. in Towards electroformed nonstructured aluminium alloys with high strength and ductility, Schuh A. C. Ruan S., MIT, 2011.
In accordance with a further aspect of the invention, the support structure comprises a polymeric material or a syntactic foam as described with reference to the prior art, in which one or more macro-spheres are inserted with or without adhesion between sphere and matrix. In accordance with a yet further aspect of the invention, the support structure comprises a flexible net or a rigid frame forming individual seats and/or grouping seats configured to receive the buoyancy spheres either individually or in clusters. Such seats may be reversibly opened or accessible for replacement or maintenance operations of the buoyancy spheres.
In accordance with a further aspect of the invention, the buoyancy device comprises a plurality of such modular support structures which are reversibly connected to one another. This allows a modulation or adjustment of both the shape and the buoyancy capacity of the buoyancy device and an easier adaptation thereof to the offshore operative conditions (spaces, dimensions, weights, assembly sequences, accessibility for maintenance operations).
In accordance with a further aspect of the invention, either the buoyancy spheres themselves (either individually or in groups or clusters) or the support structures may be externally coated by means of a protective layer of material (e.g. rubber, polymer, foam) adapted to attenuate the impacts and/or dissipate and distribute impact energy deriving from environmental factors, such as for example underwater currents.
The buoyancy device is particularly suited for deep water applications. Preferably, the device can sustain a hydrostatic pressure higher than 300 bar, and more preferably either equal to or higher than 450 bar. Preferably, the buoyancy spheres can sustain a stress in the spherical shell wall of 450 MPa, and more preferably of 700 MPa.
In order to better understand the invention and appreciate its advantages, some non-limitative examples of embodiments will be described below with reference to the figures, in which:
With reference to the figures, a buoyancy device is indicated as a whole by reference numeral 1 and comprises a support structure 2, which can be connected (e.g. by means of a fastening band 17) to an underwater application, e.g. a riser 3, one or more buoyancy spheres 4 connected to the support structure 2 and having a metal spherical shell 5, which delimits a spherical inner volume 6 (not necessarily completely void). The buoyancy spheres 4 each has an outer diameter greater than 0.5 cm, a radial thickness t of the spherical shell 5 greater than 0.08 mm, and a specific weight lower than 500 kg/m3. The spherical shell is obtained in one piece (without mechanical joints and without weld seams or gluing) in nano-crystalline metal with an average grain size of less than 1000 nanometers, preferably in the range from 10 nm to 800 nm, and even more preferably in the range from 10 nm to 200 nm.
According to an embodiment, the spherical shell 5 is obtained by deposition of metal nano-particles along a predetermined spherical geometry.
The spherical geometry may be dictated by a substrate 9 of predetermined spherical shape, on which the nano-particles are deposited. In the case in which this substrate 9 defines the shape of a spherical inner surface of the spherical shell 5 to be constructed and remains therein, the spherical shell would constitute a supporting layer of a multilayer spherical wall 8 having a base layer 9 (substrate) with a deposition surface 10 on which the spherical shell 5 is formed, e.g. by means of electrodeposition.
In alternative embodiments, the spherical shell 5 may be constructed by means of the deposition of nano-particles on substrate systems or outer spherical shapes, on substrate or spherical shapes, which are either subsequently or sequentially removed from the spherical shell 5, or by means of the deposition of particles, e.g. nano-powders in the absence of a support spherical substrate (3D printing principle).
In a preferred embodiment, the spherical shell 5 is made of aluminum or aluminum alloy, e.g. aluminum-manganese alloy (Al—Mn).
In an embodiment, the nano-crystalline metal of the spherical shell 5 has a granulometry substantially without an amorphous phase, and preferably also substantially unimodal. The choice of configuring the spherical shell 5 in nano-crystalline metal without an amorphous phase reduces the onset of at least some fragility phenomena which can be related precisely to the presence of the amorphous phase in the metal.
The support structure 2 may comprise a polymeric matrix 11 (epoxy resin, polyester or other polymers) or a syntactic foam, as described with reference to the prior art, in which one or more buoyancy spheres 4 (
According to an embodiment, the buoyancy device comprises a plurality of such support structures 2 configured as reversibly connectible modules, and preferably mutually stackable.
The buoyancy spheres 4 may comprise buoyancy spheres 4 of different size positioned in the support structure 2 (syntactic foam, frame, net, cage housing) so that the smaller buoyancy spheres 4 fill the interspaces between the larger buoyancy spheres 4, thus compacting the buoyancy device 1 and concentrating the buoyancy in smaller spaces. The buoyancy spheres 4 may be externally coated by a protection layer 18 of material adapted to attenuate impacts and/or to dissipate the impact energy, e.g. soft rubber, polymeric foams.
According to an embodiment, the buoyancy sphere 4 and the buoyancy device 1 are manufactured by the following steps:
In an embodiment, the plastic inner sphere 9 is made by means of roto-molding, by introducing polymeric powders in a revolving heated hollow mold, which melts and distributes the polymeric resin uniformly about the spherical inner wall and then cools the module to solidify and extract the inner sphere 9.
The inner sphere may be constructed by two or more parts.
Alternatively, the metallization of the inner sphere 9 may be performed by means of vacuum spraying, flame spraying or arc spraying.
Metals which can be used for metallization are, for example, Ni, Cu, Zn, Al, Ag.
The step of preparing by means of metallization can be avoided by making the inner sphere 9 directly of a suitable material as substrate for the later construction of the spherical shell 5.
In an embodiment of the buoyancy device 1 for 4000 m of depth, the buoyancy spheres 4 have outer diameters comprised between ⅕ of an inch and 4 inches (1 inch=2.54 cm) and thickness from 0.08 mm to 5 mm as a function of the outer diameter.
The sphericity tolerances may be referred to the critical arc model, which is known and widely disclosed in literature and will not be repeated here for the sake of conciseness, and may be in the order of up to 10% of sphericity tolerances and up to −10% of thickness tolerances (along the critical arc) in any point of the buoyancy sphere 4.
An outer working pressure is of 410 bar and requires a maximum dimensioning pressure of the buoyancy spheres 4 of 600 bar, considering an exemplary safety factor of 1.5 applied to the working pressure. In the example, the modulus of elasticity of the nano-structured metal material (Al—Mn aluminum alloy) of the spherical shell 5 is of 70 GPa. Thus, the modulus of elasticity E and also the yield stress limit σy of the metal alloy of the spherical shell 5 are much higher than the yield stress values of the aluminum alloys used in the prior art for particular applications (e.g. Al 7075-T6σy=570 MPa, Al 7068-T6511σ=680 MPa), while the specific weight (density) of the metal alloy of the spherical shell 5 remains lower than 3000 kg/m3, preferably lower than 2820 kg/m3.
The chart in
The chart further indicates exemplary and preferred ranges, diameters and diameter/thickness ratios of the buoyancy spheres 4 according to the invention.
The buoyancy device 1 according to the invention has many advantages, in particular:
Obviously, a person skilled in art may make further changes and variants to the buoyancy device 1 and to the production method according to the present invention, all of which without departing from the scope of protection of the invention, as defined in the following claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
MI2015A0176 | Feb 2015 | IT | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2016/050661 | 2/9/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/128884 | 8/18/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3729756 | Cook et al. | May 1973 | A |
4048686 | Ege | Sep 1977 | A |
4075862 | Ames | Feb 1978 | A |
4133182 | Chateau | Jan 1979 | A |
4933917 | Bruneval | Jun 1990 | A |
5807027 | Ostergaard | Sep 1998 | A |
7449074 | Branagan | Nov 2008 | B2 |
20100171312 | Burns | Jul 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 375 024 | Jul 1978 | FR |
2 167 017 | Feb 1988 | GB |
WO 9944881 | Sep 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180022422 A1 | Jan 2018 | US |