The present invention relates to an improved cable assembly for electrical test and measurement instrument probes.
Electrical test and measurement instruments such as oscilloscopes use a probe to interface with the device under test (“DUT”). The probe connects the DUT to the instrument, through a cable. The DUT often cannot be directly lined up with the instrument, causing the cable to bend or twist. The cable typically resists being bent or twisted, which introduces mechanical stresses to the interface between the probe and the DUT. These stresses can compromise the probe's connection to the DUT or even damage the interface.
Previous attempts to eliminate these stresses have involved securing the probe tip to the DUT, or securing the cables so that they cannot impart any mechanical stress to the DUT. For example, securing the probe tip to the DUT using tape or glue, or anchoring the cable to a stationary point near the DUT. These solutions, however, require extra work when connecting the probe to the DUT. They also prevent the probe from being easily disconnected when another device needs to be tested. Some solutions may even damage the interface between the probe and DUT when the probe is disconnected.
Attempts have also been made to manufacture a cable with an outer jacket material that makes the cable more formable. This reduces some, but not all of the cable's resistance to twisting. And because the formable outer jacket does not protect the cable as well against damage, the performance of these cables tends to deteriorate over time.
Thus, there is a need for a cable assembly that will eliminate the mechanical stresses to the DUT interface that are caused by the cable's resistance to bending and twisting, while protecting the cable from damage.
Embodiments of the present invention provide an improved probe cable assembly for electrical test and measurement instruments that reduces mechanical stresses normally caused by the cable's resistance to bending and twisting. A pliable spine holds the cable assembly in position after it has been bent or twisted, preventing mechanical stresses to the probe's interface with the device under test. A flexible boot surrounds the cable assembly, allowing it to bend and twist within a range of motion that will not damage the assembly.
The objects, advantages, and other novel features of the present invention are apparent from the following detailed description when read in conjunction with the appended claims and attached drawings.
In order to measure signals in a device under test (“DUT”), test and measurement instruments such as oscilloscopes use a probe to connect to the device. The probe connects to the instrument via one or more signal cables. Usually, the DUT and instrument cannot be lined up perfectly, and the cables must be bent or twisted into position.
Unfortunately, the cables used in electrical test and measurement instruments typically resist bending and twisting. For example, coaxial cable (also referred to as “coax”) is commonly used because it shields the test and measurement signals from electrical interference and resists being crushed. Once it is bent or twisted, however, most coax will attempt to return to its original position. This imparts mechanical stresses to the interface between the probe and DUT.
These mechanical stresses can compromise the integrity of the connection, or worse, damage the interface. Both can occur easily when the probe is attached to a small or fragile DUT interface. For example, some interfaces may consist of one or more delicate 0.004 inch diameter wires that connect the probe to the device.
Accordingly, embodiments of the present invention provide an improved test probe cable assembly that retains its position after being bent or twisted thus imparting fewer mechanical stresses to the probe-DUT interface.
In one embodiment, cable assembly 100 may comprise one or more signal cables 205 and a spine 210, as shown in
Spine 210 counteracts the signal cables' resistance to bending and twisting, which allows the cable assembly 100 to remain in position without adding mechanical stress to the DUT-probe interface. Spine 210 is normally selected from an appropriate gauge and material to counteract the properties of signal cables 205. For example, in one embodiment the pliable spine 210 may consist of a copper 20 AWG (American Wire Gauge) dead-soft wire. In some cases, however, users may prefer a stiffer spine. This could reassure the user that the cable assembly will eliminate cable stresses. Other users may prefer a softer spine for applications where flexibility is more important and cable stresses are not as much of a concern. For example, when connecting the probe to a more robust DUT interface. Thus, in some embodiments spine 210 may be softer or stiffer in order to provide the user with a desired cable feel.
An anchor at probe tip 105 may be used to secure spine 210 and prevent it from moving with respect to the probe tip 105. In one embodiment, the anchor may be a U-shaped bend in spine 210 that loops around a section of probe tip 105. In other embodiments, the anchor may comprise an L-shaped section of spine that is received by a hole or slot in probe tip 105. Any other suitable anchor mechanisms known in the art to secure spine 210 to probe tip 105 may also be used.
As shown in
In
Although
Although specific embodiments of the invention have been described for purposes of illustration, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the invention should not be limited except as by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6169834 | Keller | Jan 2001 | B1 |
7270485 | Robinson | Sep 2007 | B1 |
9404940 | Campbell | Aug 2016 | B1 |
20040165853 | Matsueda | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040182170 | Harju | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050053342 | Melton | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050162147 | Cannon | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20080008430 | Kewitsch | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080247720 | Cody | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080250632 | Dayton | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090204118 | Pratt | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100027955 | Parikh | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100186989 | Alvelo | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20120153980 | Wu et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130033280 | Engquist | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130056267 | Hatton | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20160172076 | Hess | Jun 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202010009369 | Sep 2010 | DE |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 16183615.0, dated Nov. 11, 2016, 6 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170045550 A1 | Feb 2017 | US |