The present invention relates generally to the field of medical ablation of biological tissue for treatment of disease and, more particularly, to the controlled application of radio frequency energy to soft tissue and cancerous tissue in humans and mammals to ablate such tissue through cellular destruction by Electrical Membrane Breakdown.
Cancer is not one single disease but rather a group of diseases with common characteristics that often result in sustained cell proliferation, reduced or delayed cell mortality, cooption of bodily angiogenesis and metabolic processes and evasion of bodily immune response which results in undesirable soft tissue growths called neoplasms or, more commonly, tumors. Removal or destruction of this aberrant tissue is a goal of many cancer treatment methods and modalities. Surgical tumor excision is one method of accomplishing this goal. Tissue ablation is another, minimally invasive method of destroying undesirable tissue in the body, and has been generally divided into thermal and non-thermal ablation technologies. Thermal ablation encompasses both the addition and removal of heat to destroy undesirable cells. Cryoablation is a well established technique that kills cells by freezing of the extracellular compartment resulting in cell dehydration beginning at −15 C and by intracellular ice formation causing membrane rupture occurring at colder temperatures. Because cryoablative techniques can rupture the cell membrane without denaturing cell proteins under certain conditions, such techniques have the additional ability to stimulate an antitumor immune response in the patient.
Heat based techniques are also well established for ablation of both cancerous and non cancerous tissues and include radio-frequency (RF) thermal, microwave and high intensity focused ultrasound ablation which raise localized tissue temperatures well above the body's normal 37° C. These methods use various techniques to apply energy to the target cells to raise interstitial temperature. For example, RF thermal ablation uses a high frequency electric field to induce vibrations in the cell membrane that are converted to heat by friction. Cell death occurs in as little as 30 second once the cell temperature reaches 50° C. and decreases as the temperature rises. At 60° C. cell death is instantaneous. If the intracellular temperature rises to between about 60 and 95° C., the mechanisms involved in cell death include cellular desiccation and protein coagulation. When the intracellular temperature reaches 100° C., cellular vaporization occurs as intracellular water boils to steam. In the context of tissue ablation, cell temperatures not exceeding 50° C. are not considered clinically significant. Because cellular proteins are denatured by the heat of thermal ablation techniques, they are not available to stimulate a specific immune response as they may be with cryoablation. Both heat based and cryoablation techniques suffer from the drawback that they have little or no ability to spare normal structures in the treatment zone and so can be contraindicated based on tumor location or lead to complications from collateral injury.
Non thermal ablation techniques include electrochemotherapy and irreversible electroporation which although quite distinct from one another, each rely on the phenomenon of electroporation. With reference to
With continued reference to
Developed in the early 1990's, electrochemotherapy combines the physical effect of reversible cell membrane poration with administration of chemotherapy drugs such as cisplatin and bleomycin. By temporarily increasing the cell membrane permeability, uptake of non-permeant or poorly permeant chemotherapeutic drugs is greatly enhanced. After the electric field is discontinued, the pores close and the drug molecules are retained inside the target cells without significant damage to the exposed cells. This approach to chemotherapy grew out of earlier research developing electroporation as a technique for transfection of genes and DNA molecules for therapeutic effect. In this context, irreversible electroporation leading to cell death was viewed as a failure in as much as the treated cells did not survive to realize the modification as intended.
Irreversible electroporation (IRE) as an ablation method grew out of the realization that the “failure” to achieve reversible electroporation could be utilized to selectively kill undesired tissue. IRE effectively kills a predictable treatment area without the drawbacks of thermal ablation methods that destroy adjacent vascular and collagen structures. During a typical IRE treatment, one to three pairs of electrodes are placed in or around the tumor. Electrical pulses carefully chosen to induce an electrical field strength above the critical transmembrane potential are delivered in groups of 10, usually for nine cycles. Each 10-pulse cycle takes about one second, and the electrodes pause briefly before starting the next cycle. As described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,048,067 to Rubinsky, et. al and application Ser. No. 13/332,133 by Arena, et al. which are incorporated here by reference, the field strength and pulse characteristics are chosen to provide the necessary field strength for IRE but without inducing thermal effects as with RF thermal ablation. However, because cells ablated by IRE methods undergo apoptotic death without membrane rupture their ability to induce a supplemental immune response as observed with cryoablation is impaired. When used as the sole ablative tool in a treatment protocol, IRE's inability to induce a supplemental immune response is a substantial limitation to its therapeutic benefit for patients. On the other hand, cryoablation suffers from the significant clinical disadvantages arising from the extreme cold and its capacity to destroy nearby critical healthy structures. What is needed is a minimally invasive tissue ablation technology that can avoid damaging healthy tissue while exposing cellular contents without denaturing such cellular contents so that they can to trigger a clinically useful immune response.
It is, therefore, an object of the present invention to provide a method of tissue ablation using electrical pulses which causes immediate cell death through the mechanism of complete break down the membrane of the cell.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a method of tissue ablation that causes immediate cell death electrically breaking down the cell membrane such that it can be monitored by immediate pathologic, chemical or spectroscopic examination of the tissue to evaluate efficacy of the treatment and adjust the same as needed.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a method of tissue ablation using electrical pulses that causes immediate cellular membrane breakdown non-thermally so that sensitive tissue structures are spared and the intra-cellular and membrane proteins are spilled into the extracellular space without denaturing to be exposed to the body's immune system in order to illicit a specific tumor immune response.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a method of tissue ablation that exposes non-denatured intra-cellular and membrane proteins to the immune system to illicit a specific tumor immune response which can be modulated and enhanced by a variety of additional immune modulators.
According to the present invention, the above described and other objects are accomplished, by applying to undesirable tissue in the body an external electric field specifically configured to directly and completely disintegrate the cell membrane. Referred to as Electrical Membrane Breakdown (EMB), application of an external oscillating electric field causes vibration and flexing of the cell membrane which results in a dramatic and immediate mechanical tearing or rupturing the cell membrane. EMB applies significantly higher energy levels than prior art methods to rupture the cell membrane rather than to electroporate the cell membrane. Unlike prior art methods, EMB expels the entire contents of the cell into the extracellular fluid and exposes internal components of the cell membrane which induces an inmmunologic response by the subject.
A system for generation of the electric field necessary to induce EMB includes a bipolar pulse generator operatively coupled to a controller for controlling generation and delivery of the electrical pulses necessary to generate an appropriate electric field. The field is generated by therapeutic probes placed in proximity to the soft tissue or cancerous cells within the body of the subject and the bipolar pulses are shaped, designed and applied to achieve that result in an optimal fashion. A temperature probe may be provided for temperature feedback to the controller which is configured to control the signal output characteristics of the signal generator. The EMB protocol calls for a series of short and intense bi-polar electric to generate an oscillating electric field between the electrodes that induce a similarly rapid and oscillating buildup of transmembrane potential across the cell membrane. The built up charge applies a an oscillating and flexing force to the cellular membrane which upon reaching a critical value causes extensive rupture of the membrane and spillage of the cellular content. In addition to being bi-polar, the electric pulses preferably trace a square wave form and are characterized by instant charge reversal that have substantially no relaxation time between the positive and negative polarities of the bi-polar pulse. Instant charge reversal pulses are significantly more effective in destruction of dielectric cell membranes
Important characteristic of the applied electric field include the field strength (Volts/cm), frequency, polarity, shape, duration, number and spacing. Field strength (Volts/cm) is a function of both the applied voltage and the electrode spacing and is preferably in the range of 1.500 V/cm to 10,000 V/cm absent thermal considerations. RF-EMB ablation is preferably performed by application of a series of not less than 100 electric pulses in a pulse train so as to impart the energy necessary on the target tissue without developing thermal issues in any clinically significant way. The pulse duration is preferably from 100 to 1000 μs. The relationship between the duration and frequency of each pulse determines the number of instantaneous charge reversals experienced by the cell membrane during each pulse. The duration of each inter pulse burst interval is determined by the controller 14 based on thermal considerations. Real time temperature feedback of the treatment site may be provided to the controller by which the controller can modulate treatment parameters to eliminate thermal effects as desired. Current flow at the treatment site may also be monitored for this purpose.
The EMB ablation method is carried out by first identifying the location of the soft tissue within the subject to be ablated by medical imaging techniques such as CT or MRI or other means. A preferred position and spacing of the electrodes relative to the target tissue is determined and from 1 to 6 needle electrodes connected to the controller and signal generator are inserted into position in and around the treatment site. Placement and positioning of the electrodes is confirmed by medical imaging and the pulse generator is activated to apply electrical pulses to the electrodes to generate the treatment field thereby causing electrical membrane breakdown of cells in the soft tissue.
Electrical membrane breakdown causes immediate spillage of all intracellular components of the ruptured cells into an extracellular space and exposes the internal constituent parts of the cell and cell membrane including antigens which induce an immunologic response to destroy and remove this and like material in the body of the subject. The immunologic response can be enhanced by administration of agents that increase the immunologic response process including drugs. Electrical membrane breakdown causes immediate, visually observable tissue change, cellular membrane destruction and cell death such that the method may include the biopsy of a portion of the treated target tissue to verify treatment efficacy immediately after completion of the treatment while the patient is still in position for additional treatment. In other embodiments needle probes placed in critical treatment locations could monitor various parameters by means of chemical or spectroscopic means related to the immediate destruction and spillage of the intra-cellular contents also to verify treatment efficacy. In some situation, the mode of treatment may be switched from EMB to thermal ablation without removal or repositioning of the electrodes by reconfiguring the signal generated by the pulse generator to increase the tissue temperature at the electrodes according to known RF thermal techniques.
While the making and using of various embodiments of the present invention are discussed in detail below, it should be appreciated that the present invention provides many applicable inventive concepts that can be embodied in a wide variety of specific contexts. The specific embodiments discussed herein are merely illustrative of specific ways to make and use the invention and do not limit the scope of the invention.
Irreversible electroporation as a tissue ablation method is well developed with commercially manufactured equipment such as the NanoKnife by AngioDynamics (Latham, N.Y.) available on the market. As described, this ablation technique utilizes high electric field strengths, within specific parameters, to induce irreversible electroporation of the cell membrane resulting in eventual cell death due to loss of homeostasis and apoptosis. The present invention also describes methods for ablating cells within the body of a subject utilizing high frequency and high strength electric fields but does so through the entirely different process of Electrical Membrane Breakdown (EMB) using very different energy characteristics. Electrical Membrane Breakdown is the application of an external oscillating electric field to cause vibration and flexing of the cell membrane which results in a dramatic and immediate mechanical tearing, disintegration or rupturing of the cell membrane. Unlike IRE, in which nano-pores are created in the cell membrane but through which little or no content of the cell is released, EMB completely tears open the cell membrane such that the entire contents of the cell are expelled into the extracellular fluid, and internal components of the cell membrane itself are exposed.
The present invention relies on the interaction of an applied electric field with the transmembrane potential but its similarity to IRE ends there. EMB applies significantly higher energy levels by specifically configured electric field profiles to directly and completely disintegrate the cell membrane rather than to electroporate the cell membrane. Others have demonstrated that the energy levels required for EMB is 100 times greater than for IRE using the same pulse configurations (pulse number and voltage density) delivered by currently available IRE equipment and protocols. The inability of current IRE methods and energy protocols to deliver the energy necessary to cause EMB explains why pathologic examination of IRE treated specimens has never shown the pathologic characteristics of EMB and is a critical reason why EMB had not until now been recognized as an alternative method of cell destruction.
With reference to
With reference to
The destruction of dielectric cell membranes through the process of Electrical Membrane Breakdown is significantly more effective if the applied voltage pulse can transition from a positive to a negative polarity without delay in between. Instant charge reversal prevents rearrangement of induced surface charges resulting in a short state of tension and transient mechanical forces in the cells, the effects of which are amplified by large and abrupt force reversals. Alternating stress on the target cell that causes structural fatigue is thought to reduce the critical electric field strength required for EMB. The added structural fatigue inside and along the cell membrane results in or contributes to physical changes in the structure of the cell. These physical changes and defects appear in response to the force applied with the oscillating EMB protocol and approach dielectric membrane breakdown as the membrane position shifts in response to the oscillation, up to the point of total membrane rupture and catastrophic discharge. This can be analogized to fatigue or weakening of a material caused by progressive and localized structural damage that occurs when a material is subjected to cyclic loading, such as for example a metal paper clip that is subjected to repeated bending. The nominal maximum stress values that cause such damage may be much less than the strength of the material under ordinary conditions. The effectiveness of this waveform compared to other pulse waveforms can save up to ⅕ or ⅙ of the total energy requirement.
With reference to
With continued reference to
In addition to controlling the pulse amplitude 30, frequency 31, polarity and shape provided by the pulse generator 16, the logic controller 14 controls the number of pulses 32 to be applied in the treatment series or pulse train, the duration of each pulse 32, and the inter pulse burst delay 33. Although only two are depicted in
In yet another embodiment, the controller may monitor or determine current flow through the tissue during treatment fir the purpose of avoiding overheating while yet permitting treatment to continue by reducing the applied voltage. Reduction in tissue impedance during treatment due to charge buildup and membrane rupture can cause increased current flow which engenders additional heating at the treatment site. With reference to
With reference to
With reference to
The method of ablating undesirable soft tissue of the present invention is carried out by first identifying the location of the soft tissue within the subject to be ablated. Tissue identification may be done by known medical imaging techniques such as ultrasound, CT or MRI. The target soft tissue may or may not be a malignancy but rather need only be tissue that is undesirable in its present location for some reason. After identification of the target tissue, the preferred position and spacing of the electrodes relative to target soft tissue is determined based on the location and shape of the tissue to be ablated, the shape and location of adjacent structures, the dielectric constant and the conductivity of the target and surrounding soft tissue. Typically from 1 to 6 needle type probe electrodes are used. The electrodes are introduced into position in and around the treatment and connected to a controller for controlled delivery of the electric pulses for field generation and treatment. The probe electrodes may include a temperature sensor such as a thermocouple for reading and signaling to the controller the local temperature at or near the electrode. Placement and positioning of the electrodes may preferably be confirmed by medical imaging. The pulse generator is activated by the controller to apply electrical pulses to the electrodes to generate the treatment field as described above thereby causing electrical membrane breakdown of some or all of cells of said soft tissue.
Electrical membrane breakdown, unlike IRE or thermal ablation techniques, causes immediate spillage of all intracellular components of the ruptured cells into an extracellular space and exposes the internal constituent part of the cell membrane to the extracellular space. The intracellular components include cellular antigens and the internal constituent parts of the cell membrane include antigens specific to the cell membrane which induce an immunologic response to destroy and remove this and like material in the body of the subject. Like material may be other material in the body of the subject having the same cellular antigens or cell membrane specific antigens at locations remote from the treatment site including metastatic tissue. However, the human body also has natural defense systems for tumors which prevent destruction and/or removal of the tumor in some cases. One of these operates via an inhibitory signal, which presents itself to the body's cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), the cells in the body that recognize and destroy cancer cells, and binds to the cytototoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) receptor, turning off the cytotoxic reaction that may otherwise destroy the cancer cell.
Thus, according to another embodiment of the present invention, the immunologic response of RF-EMB is enhanced by administration of drugs that increase the immunologic response process including drugs which block inhibition of the CTLA-4 inhibitory signal of cytotoxic lymphocytes, or that bind to the S100-A9 protein, which is involved in modulating regulatory myeloid cell functions. An example of the former drug type is Ipilimumab (marketed as Yervoy®). An example of the latter is Tasquinimod. Such drugs can be administered by any means, including without limitation, intravenously, orally or intramuscularly and may further be injected directly into or adjacent to the target soft tissue immediately before or after applying the EMB electric field or a set number of days before or after an RF-EMB treatment, as described in the sample treatment protocols below. Such immunologic response enhancing drug may be comprised also of autologous dendritic cells. For example, Sipuleucel-T (marketed as Provenge®) therapy uses autologous patient dendritic cells activated with prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) and infused back into the patient's system. Another relevant immunologic drug is pembrolizumab, which works by blocking a protein known as Programmed Death receptor (PD-1), or a related protein known as PD-L 1, both of which are used by tumors as a defense to tumor-fighting cells. Yet another relevant immunologic drug is cyclophosphamide, which depresses regulatory T cells and interfere with DNA replication. Many immunologic drugs such as those described herein are effective against one or a small handful of cancer types, but are not effective, in isolation, against all cancer types for which this class of drugs was designed to be used.
Combining RF-EMB treatment with the administration of an immunologic drug such as those described above leaves the target cells' antigens intact and exposed to the external environment, allowing them to react with the patient's immune system, all of which aids the functioning of the immunologic drug. The combination treatment may aid in the treatment of patients with one of two distinct disease pathologies. In a first embodiment, comprising a method for treating a patient with a primary cancerous tumor and a high likelihood of micrometastatic disease, RF-EMB may be applied to cause direct destruction of the primary tumor preceded or followed by the administration of a immunologic drug regimen designed to interact cooperatively with the intact antigens which have been exposed as a result of the RF-EMB treatment. The immunologic drug chosen may be one that blocks the inhibitory response that may otherwise prevent the patient's body from recognizing and destroying the RF-EMB target cells and others having the same cellular antigens (i.e., micrometastatic growths) as a result of the RF-EMB treatment. In a second embodiment, comprising a method for treating a patient having advanced metastatic disease, RF-EMB treatment may be administered at midpoints of an ongoing treatment plan utilizing an immunologic drug as described above. Under this embodiment. RF-EMB treatments enhance the effectiveness of the immunologic drug by exposing unique cellular antigens to the patient's immune system.
Three sample treatment protocols for the use of RF-EMB in conjunction with the administration of an immunologic drug are now described. In Example 1, 300 mg/m2 of cyclophosphamide are administered intravenously to the patient on Day 1 of treatment. On Day 3, the patient receives RF-EMB treatment according to one of the four protocols described above with reference to
Electrical membrane breakdown causes immediate, visually observable tissue change, cellular membrane destruction and cell death. As a result, the method may include the biopsy of a portion of the treated target tissue to verify treatment efficacy immediately after completion of the treatment while the patient is still in position for additional treatment. Additional treatment may be immediately administered based on the biopsy result and visual determination of treatment efficacy.
Alternatively, because the intracellular environment comprises a unique chemical composition, such as high potassium and uric acid concentrations, spillage of the cell contents can now be detected by methods such as placing one or more needle probes into critical locations of the treatment area to measure chemical levels using chemical reagents, electrical impedance or resistance measurements, pH measurements, spectroscopy, or the like. Moreover, a device such as a microneedle sensor, comprising one or more sensors capable of measuring the above qualities integrated into or inserted through the hollow core of a microneedle, may be inserted at one or more predetermined locations in the treatment area during an RF-EMB procedure to measure cellular spillage via extracellular chemical composition in real time.
According to this method, in a preferred embodiment, a hollow needle having at least one dimension of less than 1 millimeter (known as a microneedle) is outfitted with one or more sensors by inserting the sensor(s) through the hollow center of the needle. The sensor(s) may be one or more of the types described above, including but not limited to a pH sensor, a lactate sensor, a glucose sensor, an electrical impedance sensor, a potassium sensor, and/or a uric acid sensor. Multiple such sensors may be bundled together or a single sensor could be used which measures one or more of the relevant properties. In an alternative embodiment, the sensor may be a spectrometer. Most preferably, one or more sensor-containing microneedles are inserted into the selected treatment area immediately prior to the application of RF-EMB treatment, and remain inserted into the treated tissue for the entire duration of the treatment session. Readings from the sensors may be measured by any means known in the art. Such a method has the added benefit of allowing the treatment provider to observe and quantify the level of target cell destruction, and thereby treatment efficacy, in real time and in vivo. By contrast, prior art, thermal ablation methods or non thermal ablation methods such as IRE lack this capability in that they do not cause a measurable amount of the cellular contents to be spilled into the extracellular area immediately, resulting instead in thermal necrosis or targeted apoptotic cell death which destroys the cell and its contents before any of the cellular contents are exposed for measurement. Thus, prior art ablation methods often required a biopsy of the treated area to determine treatment efficacy, which cannot be completed until the termination of the treatment.
According to this preferred embodiment, treatment parameters and/or location(s) may be monitored and/or adjusted in real time based on the real time measured levels of cellular spillage during the treatment process. In addition, or alternatively, measurements of the cellular contents as described herein may be taken before, after, or between phases of treatment without the need to subject the patient to a biopsy or other invasive procedure to measure treatment efficacy. Measurement techniques for cellular contents are not limited to those described herein, but may be carried out by any means known in the art of measuring chemical compositions of a targeted treatment area in vivo and/or in real time.
In yet another alternate embodiment of the present invention, with or without intermediate biopsy and visual observation for efficacy, the mode of treatment according to the present invention may be switched from EMB to thermal ablation without removal or repositioning of the electrodes. A switch to thermal ablation may be desirable to control bleeding at the tissue site or for direct destruction of undesirable tissue in concert with the RF-EMB. The switch may occur within a single pulse train by operation of the controller, or may be accomplished by a second or additional pulse train directed to RF thermal ablation only. The switch is accomplished by reconfiguring the signal generated by the pulse generator to increase the tissue temperature at the electrodes according to known RF thermal techniques.
Having now fully set forth the preferred embodiment and certain modifications of the concept underlying the present invention, various other embodiments as well as certain variations and modifications of the embodiments herein shown and described will obviously occur to those skilled in the art upon becoming familiar with said underlying concept. It is to be understood, therefore, that the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically set forth in the appended claims.
Studies estimate that cancer kills approximately 20,000 people worldwide per day. Many casualties could be avoided and the quality of life could be improved for many patients with more effective, minimally invasive methods treatment of cancerous tumors and other conditions resulting in unwanted soft tissue. Minimally invasive treatments capable of assisting a patient's own immune system in attacking and removing unwanted or cancerous tissue within the patient's body would further aid in saving lives and improving patient quality of life. What is needed is a minimally invasive method of removal of unwanted soft tissue, such as cancerous tumors. The present invention is an innovative method of ablating unwanted soft tissue within a patient's body that has applicability to many types of cancerous as well as non-cancerous tissue, that significantly improves effectiveness of performing such a procedure, and that further provides a means to directly measure the efficacy of such procedures in vivo and simultaneous with treatment.
This patent application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/912,172 filed Dec. 5, 2013 and titled “Cancer Antigen Enhanced Presentation to Antigen Presenting Cells by Radiofrequency Electrical Membrane Breakdown (RF-EMB) as an Adjuvant Mechanism for Immunotherapy,” which is here incorporated in its entirety by reference. This patent application also claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/451,333, filed Aug. 4, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,154,869, and titled “System and Method For Creating Radio-Frequency Energy Electrical Membrane Breakdown For Tissue Ablation” which is here incorporated in its entirety by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4483338 | Bloom | Nov 1984 | A |
5139496 | Hed et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5575811 | Reid | Nov 1996 | A |
5672174 | Gough et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5931807 | McClure | Aug 1999 | A |
6120493 | Hofmann | Sep 2000 | A |
6135990 | Heller | Oct 2000 | A |
6214297 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6241702 | Lundquist | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6379348 | Onik | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6408199 | Goldin | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6482619 | Rubinsky et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6505629 | Mikus et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6575969 | Rittman, III et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6623480 | Kuo et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6733485 | Whitehurst | May 2004 | B1 |
6978174 | Gelfand et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7113821 | Sun et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7162303 | Levin et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7572623 | Mangano et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7620451 | Demarais et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7653438 | Deem et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7680543 | Azure | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7744878 | Mather | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7853333 | Demarais | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7937143 | Demarais et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7938824 | Chomenky | May 2011 | B2 |
8048067 | Davalos et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8114070 | Rubinsky et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8131371 | Demarais et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8145316 | Deem et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8221411 | Francischelli et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8226648 | Paul et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8231603 | Hobbs et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8282631 | Davalos et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8465484 | Davalos et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8814860 | Davalos et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
9545523 | Nanda | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9598491 | Ahmed et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
10154869 | Onik et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10448989 | Arena et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10849678 | Onik et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
11141216 | Onik et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
20010044596 | Jaafar | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020019644 | Hastings et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020086014 | Korman et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020087151 | Mody et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095124 | Palasis et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020111617 | Cosman et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020128640 | Swanson et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020183684 | Dev et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193784 | McHale et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193789 | Underwood et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193833 | Dimmer et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030018329 | Hooven | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030045495 | Li et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055471 | Fenn et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030093067 | Panescu | May 2003 | A1 |
20030153960 | Chornenky | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163040 | Gildenberg | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030204161 | Ferek-Petric | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030216722 | Swanson et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030216792 | Levin et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040143261 | Hartley et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040248842 | Wagner et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050182462 | Chomenky et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050214268 | Cavanagh et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050221270 | Connelly et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050261672 | Deem | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050288667 | Thompson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288730 | Deem et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060041277 | Deem et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060073589 | Belardelli et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060149147 | Yanof | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161246 | Rhim et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060293725 | Rubinsky et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293730 | Rubinsky et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070031338 | Zabinski | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043345 | Davalos et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070049919 | Lee | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070060989 | Deem | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070066957 | Demarais et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083193 | Werneth et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070083239 | Demarais et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070129720 | Demarais et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070129760 | Demarais | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070233057 | Konishi | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080033417 | Nields et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080058706 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071265 | Azure | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080132884 | Rubinsky et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080132885 | Rubinsky et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080208052 | LePivert et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080247506 | Maschke | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080306476 | Hennings et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319375 | Hardy | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090028857 | Li et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090088648 | Jaffe et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090118727 | Pearson et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090143717 | Bass | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090177094 | Brown et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090292342 | Rubinsky et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090326366 | Krieg | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100023004 | Francischelli et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100030211 | Davalos et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100049031 | Fruland et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100049178 | Deem | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100069833 | Wenderow et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100100092 | Turner et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100152725 | Pearson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100179530 | Long et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100221351 | He et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249771 | Pearson et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100250209 | Pearson et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100261944 | Davalos et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100262067 | Chomenky et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274178 | LePivert et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100331758 | Davalos et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110015630 | Azure | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110082534 | Wallace | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110106221 | Neal, II | May 2011 | A1 |
20110112520 | Michael | May 2011 | A1 |
20110160514 | Long et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110160614 | Long et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110166499 | Demarais et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110190659 | Long et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110190764 | Long et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110202053 | Moss et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110217270 | Cavanagh, III et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120021481 | Hebner et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120041525 | Karni | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120071749 | Xu et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120071872 | Rubinsky et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120071874 | Davalos et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120109122 | Arena et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120143181 | Demarais et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120190040 | Talebpour et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120215218 | Lipani | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120215221 | Woloszko | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120220998 | Long et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120220999 | Long | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120221002 | Long et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120230939 | Perambakam et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120252087 | Hebner et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120253188 | Holland | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120277741 | Davalos et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120277763 | Greenblatt | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130108667 | Wang et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130101551 | Har-Noy | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130071905 | Soikum et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130110098 | Lalonde | May 2013 | A1 |
20130184702 | Neal, II et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130189301 | Har-Noy | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130211230 | Sperling | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130237984 | Sklar | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130289369 | Margolis | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130295110 | Binder et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130302409 | Fuchs et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130304062 | Chan et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130310823 | Gefland et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130345697 | Garcia et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140012251 | Himmelstein et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140039491 | Basok et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140088578 | Rubinsky et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140172054 | Zarins et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140205609 | Valentine | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140234296 | Sharma et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140257272 | Clark et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140328833 | Korman et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140350537 | Baust et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140356397 | Akle et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150150618 | Onik et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150190505 | Yeung | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150201996 | Rubisky | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150230850 | McKay | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150265705 | Li et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150374436 | Subramaniam et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160128767 | Azamian et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160338754 | Baust et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160346354 | Heslet et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160367310 | Onik et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170020931 | Zhou et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170143780 | Zitvogel et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170274011 | Garibyan et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20180021084 | Onik et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180028260 | Onik et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180028267 | Onik et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180133319 | Vo-Dinh et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180154142 | Guo et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180263685 | Onik et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180318365 | Yeung et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180318393 | Pierce et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190023804 | Onik et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190183561 | Hobbs et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190209652 | Pierce et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190241658 | Frederick | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190298770 | Rabinovich et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20200040095 | Onik et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200277379 | Bostwick et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20210177491 | Onik et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1280513 | Jan 2001 | CN |
1658924 | Aug 2005 | CN |
101085391 | Dec 2007 | CN |
103118678 | May 2013 | CN |
2001523987 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2006187446 | Jul 2006 | JP |
2009-297527 | Dec 2009 | JP |
2010500153 | Jan 2010 | JP |
2013531043 | Aug 2013 | JP |
5341287 | Nov 2013 | JP |
2015-38492 | Feb 2015 | JP |
WO 2004037313 | May 2004 | WO |
WO 2008034103 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2010080974 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO 2012088149 | Jun 2012 | WO |
WO 201299974 | Jul 2012 | WO |
WO 2013053775 | Apr 2013 | WO |
WO 2013079980 | Jun 2013 | WO |
WO 2014149690 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO 2015085162 | Jun 2015 | WO |
WO 2015125159 | Aug 2015 | WO |
WO 2015140150 | Sep 2015 | WO |
WO 2015153639 | Oct 2015 | WO |
WO 2016123608 | Aug 2016 | WO |
WO 2016126778 | Aug 2016 | WO |
WO 2016126811 | Aug 2016 | WO |
WO 2016126905 | Aug 2016 | WO |
WO 2016127162 | Aug 2016 | WO |
WO 2016123608 | Aug 2016 | WO |
WO 2016126778 | Aug 2016 | WO |
WO 2016126811 | Aug 2016 | WO |
WO 2016126905 | Aug 2016 | WO |
WO 2016127162 | Aug 2016 | WO |
WO 2017123981 | Jul 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT Appln. No. PCT/US2019/066876, dated Jun. 2, 2020, 11 pages. |
Royal, et al., “Phase 2 trial of single agent ipilimumab (anti-CLTA-4) for locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma,” J. Immunother., 2010, 33(8):828-833. |
Barnett et al., “Surgical ablation as treatment for the elimination of atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis,” The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, May 1, 2006, 131(5):1029-35. |
Cox et al,. “The surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation,” The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 1991, 101(1-4):402-426, 569-592. |
Cummings et al., “Alternative energy sources for the ablation of arrhythmias,” Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, May 2005, 28(5):434-43. |
Doll et al., “Esophageal perforation during left atrial radiofrequency ablation: is the risk too high?,” The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Apr. 1, 2003, 125(4):836-42. |
Ninet et al., “Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation with off-pump, epicardial, high-intensity focused ultrasound: results of a multicenter trial,” The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, Sep. 1, 2005, 130(3):803-e1. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability in international Appln. No. PCT/US2016/016955, dated July 1, 2016, 6 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in international Appln. No. PCT/US2016/016955, dated July 1, 2016, 9 pages. |
Viola et al., “The technology in use for the surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation,” InSeminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Jul. 1, 2002, 14(3):198-205. |
Al Sakere et al., “A study of the immunological response to tumor ablation with irreversible electroporation,” Technol Cancer Res Treat., Aug. 2007, 6(4):301-306. |
Ammar et al., “Impact of a pulsed electric field on damage of plant tissues: effects of cell size and tissue electrical conductivity,” J Food Sci., Jan.-Feb. 2011, 76(1):E90-7. |
Arena et al. “High-Frequency Irreversible Electroporation (H-FIRE) for Non-Thermal Ablation without Muscle Contraction”, Biomed Eng. Online Nov. 21, 2011, 10:102. |
Aronsson et al., “Inactivation of Escherichia coli, Listeria innocua and Saccharomyces cerevisiae in relation to membrane permeabilization and subsequent leakage of intracellular compounds due to pulsed electric field processing,” Int J Food Microbiol., Mar. 1, 2005, 99(1):19-32. |
Asavasanti et al., “Critical electric field strengths of onion tissues treated by pulsed electric fields,” J Food Sci., Sep. 2010, 75(7):E433-43. |
Asavasanti et al., “Permeabilization of plant tissues by monopolar pulsed electric fields: effect of frequency,” J Food Sci. Jan.-Feb. 2011, 76(1):E98-111. |
Au et al., “Irreversible electroporation facilitates gene transfer of a GM-CSF plasmid with a local and systemic response,” Surgery, Sep. 2013, 154(3):496-503. |
Beebe et al., “Non-ionizing radiation with nanosecond pulsed electric fields as a cancer treatment: in vitro studies,” Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc., Sep. 2-6, 2009, pp. 6509-6512. |
Bertacchini et al., “Design of an irreversible electroporation system for clinical use,” Technol Cancer Res Treat., Aug. 2007, 6(4):313-20. |
Brooks et al., “Intratumoral injection of GM-CSF in perspective—A review,” Journal of Medicine. Jan. 1, 2003, 34(1-6):149-53. |
Chang et al. “Changes in Membrane Structure Induced by Electroporation as Revealed by Rapid-Freezing Electron Microscopy”, Biophys J., Jul. 1, 1990, 58(1):1-12. |
Chang et al., “Construction of a Genomic Map of H. pylori by Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE),” Methods Mol Med., 1997, 8:165-176. |
Chen et al., “Leukemic cell intracellular responses to nanosecond electric fields,” Biochem Biophys Res Commun., Apr. 30, 2004, 317(2):421-427. |
Chen et al., “Membrane electroporation theories: a review,” Med Biol Eng Comput., 2006, 44:5-14. |
Chen et al., “Nanosecond electric pulses penetrate the nucleus and enhance speckle formation,” Biochem Biophys Res Commun., Dec. 14, 2007, 364(2):220-225. |
Chen et al., “Picosecond pulsed electric fields induce apoptosis in HeLa cells via the endoplasmic reticulum stress and caspase-dependent signaling pathways,” Int J Oncol., Mar. 2013, 42(3):963-70. |
Crowley “Electrical breakdown of bimolecular lipid membranes as an electromechanical instability,” Biophys J., Jul. 1973, 13(7):711-724. |
Djunzenova et al., “Effect of electric field pulses on the viability and on the membrane-bound immunoglobulins of LPS-activated murine B-lymphocytes: correlation with the cell cycle,” Cymetry, Jan. 1, 1994, 15(1):35-45. |
Dortch et al., “Characterization of pulsed magnetic field therapy in a rat model for rheumatoid arthritis,” Biomed Sci Instrum., 2006, 42:302-307, Abstract Only. |
Dyson et al., “Kinetic and physical studies of cell death induced by chemotherapeutic agents or hyperthermia,” Cell Tissue Kinet., May 1986, 19(3):311-324. |
EP Search Report in European Appln. No. 16744266.4, dated Oct. 18, 2018, 10 pages. |
EP Search Report in European Appln. No. 17739066.3, dated Dec. 17, 2019, 20 pages. |
Eppich et al., “Pulsed electric fields for selection of hematopoietic cells and depletion of tumor cell contaminants,” Nat Biotechnol., Aug. 2000, 18(8):882-887. |
Ersus et al., “Disintegration efficiency of pulsed electric field induced effects on onion (Allium cepa L.) tissues as a function of pulse protocol and determination of cell integrity by 1H-NMR relaxometiy,” J Food Sci. Sep. 2010 ,75(7):E444-52. |
Fehres et al,. “Understanding the biology of antigen cross-presentation for the design of vaccines against cancer,” Frontiers in immunology. Apr. 8, 2014, 5:149. |
Foltz, “Algae Lysis with Pulsed Electric Fields,” California State Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo 2012, [retrieved on May 13, 2019]retrieved from URL <http://digitalcommons.-calpoly.edu/theses/732/>, 76 pages. |
García et al., “Biosynthetic requirements for the repair of sublethal membrane damage in Escherichia coli cells after pulsed electric fields,” J Appl Microbiol., Mar. 2006, 100(3):428-435. |
Garilevich et al., “Outlook for the use of focused shock waves and pulsed electric fields in the complex treatment of malignant neoplasms,” Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006, 1:6370-6372. |
Gómez-Ochoa et al., “Pulsed electromagnetic fields decrease proinflammatory cytokine secretion (IL-1β and TNF-α) on human fibroblast-like cell culture,” Rheumatol Int., Oct. 2011, 31(10):1283-1289. |
Gong et al., “Cancer Patient T Cells Genetically Targeted to Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Specifically Lyse Prostate Cancer Cells and Release Cytokines in Response to Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen,” Neoplasia, Jun. 1999, 1(2):123-127. |
Gordon et al., “Intracellular hyperthermia. A biophysical approach to cancer treatment via intracellular temperature and biophysical alterations,” Med Hypotheses., Jan. 1979, 5(1):83-102. |
Grys et al., “Decreasing the thresholds for electroporation by sensitizing cells with local cationic anesthetics and substances that decrease the surface negative electric charge,” Cell Mol Biol Lett., Mar. 2014, 19(1):65-76. |
Hamid et al., “Safety and tumor responses with lambrolizumab (anti-PD-1) in melanoma,” N Engl J Med., Jul. 11, 2013, 369(2):134-144. |
Harris “Effects of Tumor-like assay conditions, Ionizing radiation, and hyperthermia on immune lysis of tumor cells by cytotoxic T-lymphocytes,” Cancer Res., Aug. 1976, 36(8):2733-2739. |
Hebb et al., “Systemic Antitumor Effects of Intratumoral Administration of the Novel Immunotherapeutic Combination Anti-CTLA4, Anti-CD137, and Anti-0X40 in Mouse Models of Lymphoma and Solid Tumor,” Blood Journal, Dec. 3, 2015 126(23):1552. |
Hillen et al., “Treatment of Metastatic Posterior Vertebral Body Osseous Tumors by Using a Targeted Bipolar Radiofrequency Ablation Device: Technical Note,” Radiology, Jun. 13, 2014, 273(1):261-267. |
Hua et al., “Intense picosecond pulsed electric fields induce apoptosis through a mitochondrial-mediated pathway in HeLa cells,” Mol Med Rep., Apr. 2012, 5(4):981-987. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in International Application No. PCT/US2014/068774, dated Jun. 7, 2016, 13 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in International Application No. PCT/US2016/015944, dated Aug. 1, 2017, 9 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in International Application No. PCT/US2016/016300, dated Aug. 8, 2017, 6 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in International Application No. PCT/US2016/016352, dated Aug. 8, 2017, 6 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in International Application No. PCT/US2016/016501, dated Aug. 8, 2017, 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US2014/068774, dated Mar. 19, 2015, 15 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US2016/015944, dated Jul. 29, 2016, 13 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US2016/016300, dated Jul. 8, 2016, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US2016/016352, dated Jul. 18, 2016, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US2016/016501, dated Sep. 2, 2016, 10 pages. |
Iu et al., “Reduction in levels of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in apple cider by pulsed electric fields,” J Food Prot., Jul. 2001, 64(7):964-969. |
Jaeger et al., “Protective effect of milk constituents and sublethal injuries limiting process effectiveness during PEF inactivation of Lb. rhamnosus,” Int J Food Microbiol., Aug. 31, 2009, 134(1-2):154-161. |
Jeffers et al., “Dimethylformamide as an enhancer of cavitation-induced cell lysis in vitro,” J Acoust Soc Am., Jan. 1995, 97(1):669-676. |
Jia et al., “Crystal stmeture of human grancalcin, a member of the penta-EF-hand protein family,” J Mol Biol., Jul. 28, 2000, 300(5):1271-81. |
JP Office action in Japanese Appln. No. 2017-540247, dated Nov. 26, 2019, 27 pages (with english translation). |
Kawano et al., “Cryoimmunologic Antitumor Effects Enhanced by Dendritic Cells in Osteosarcoma”, Clin Orthop Relat Res., May 2010, 468(5):1373-1383. |
Kennedy et al., “Cationic Peptide Exposure Enhances Pulsed-Electric-Field-Mediated Membrane Disruption,” PLoS One, Mar. 26, 2014, 9(3):e92528. |
Kennedy et al., “Quantification of electroporative uptake kinetics and electric field heterogeneity effects in cells,” Biophys J., Jun. 2008, 94(12):5018-5027. |
Kim et al., “Changes of apoptosis in tumor tissues with time after irreversible electroporation,” Biochem Biophys Res Commun., Jun. 14, 2013, 435(4):651-656. |
Koga et al., “Interstitial Radiofrequency Hyperthermia for Brain Tumors,” Neurol Med Chir., May 1993, 33(5):290-294. |
Koster et al., “Recent developments and future challenges in immune checkpoint inhibitory cancer treatment,” Current opinion in oncology, Nov. 1, 2015, 27(6):482-8. |
Laufer et al., “Tissue Characterization Using Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy Data: A Linear Algebra Approach,” Physiol Measu., 2012, 33:997-1013. |
Lee et al., “Electron microscopic demonstration and evaluation of irreversible electroporation-induced nanopores on hepatocyte membranes,” J Vasc Interv Radiol., Jan. 2012, 23(1):107-113. |
Li et al., “Immunologic Response to Tumor Ablation with Irreversible Electroporation”, PLOS One, Nov. 6, 2012, 7(11):e48749. |
Li et al., “The effect of lipid molecular packing stress on cationic liposome-induced rabbit erythrocyte fusion,” Biochim Biophys Acta., Jan. 14, 1997, 1323(1):105-116. |
Lin et al., “Preparation of antioxidant peptide from egg white protein and improvement of its activities assisted by high-intensity pulsed electric field,” J Sci Food Agric., May 2012, 92(7):1554-1561. |
Ma et al., “Experimental Study on Residual Tumor Angiogenesis after Cryoablation,” Asian Pac J Cancer Prev., 2014, 15(6):2491-2494. |
Maor et al., “Irreversible electroporation attenuates neointimal formation after angioplasty,” IEEE Trans Biomed Eng., Sep. 2008, 55(9):2268-2274. |
Marx et al., “A comparative study on the structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under nonthermal technologies: high hydrostatic pressure, pulsed electric fields and thermo-sonication,” Int J Food Microbiol., Dec. 15, 2011, 151(3)327-337. |
Mi et al., “[Effect of steep pulsed electric fields on the immune response of tumor-bearing Wistar mice],” Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi., Apr. 2007, 24(2):253-256, Abstract Only. |
Miller et al., “Integrated Carbon Fiber Electrodes within Hollow Polymer Microneedles for Transdermal Electrochemical Sensing,” Biomicrofluidics., Mar. 30, 2011, 5(1):13415. |
Miller et al., “Multiplexed microneedle-based biosensor array for characterization of metabolic acidosis,” Talanta., Jan. 15, 2012, 88:739-742. |
Milligan et al., “Interstitial Hyperthermia,” Med Instrum., May-Jun. 1984, 18(3):175-180, Abstract Only. |
Mishra et al., “Electric Property Sensing Biopsy Needle for Prostate Cancer Detection,” Prostate, Nov. 2013, 73(15):1603-1613. |
Morshed et al., “Electrical lysis: dynamics revisited and advances in On-chip operation,”Crit Rev Biomed Eng., 2013, 41(1):37-50. |
Neal et al. “In Vitro and Numerical Support for Combinatorial Irreversible Electroporation and Electrochemotherapy Glioma Treatment”, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, Mar. 2014, 42(3):475-487. |
Neal et al., “Improved local and systemic anti-tumor efficacy for irreversible electroporation in immunocompetent versus immunodeficient mice,” PLOS One., May 24, 2013, 8(5):e64559. |
Neumann et al., “Permeability changes induced by electric impulses in vesicular membranes,” J Membr Biol., Dec. 29, 1972, 10(3):279-290. |
O'Dowd et al., “An assessment of the effect of pulsed electrical fields on tenderness and selected quality attributes of post rigour beef muscle,” Meat Sci., Feb. 2013, 93(2):303-309. |
Onik et al. “Irreversible Electroporation: Implications for Prostate Ablation”, Technology in Cancer Res. and Treatment, Aug. 2007, 6(4): 295-300. |
Onik et al. “Long-Term Results of Optimized Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Average 10-Year Follow-Up in 70 Patients,” Journal of Men's Health, Jun. 2014, 11(2):64-74. |
Onik et al., “Three-Dimensional Sonographically Monitoring Cryosurgery in a Prostate Phantom,” Journal of Ultrasound, 1996, 16:267-270. |
Oshima et al., “Bacterial sterilization and intracellular protein release by a pulsed electric field,” Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol., Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol., 2004, 90:113-33. |
Peper et al., “An impedance-based cytotoxicity assay for real-time and label-free assessment of T-cell-mediated killing of adherent cells,” J Immunol Methods, Mar. 2014, 405:192-198. |
Persson et al., “A model for evaluating therapeutic response of combined cancer treatment modalities: applied to treatment of subcutaneously implanted brain tumors (N32 and N29) in Fischer rats with pulsed electric fields (PEF) and 60Co-gamma radiation (RT),” Technol Cancer Res Treat., Oct. 1, 2003, 2(5):459-470. |
Poudineh et al., “Three-dimensional, sharp-tipped electrodes concentrate applied fields to enable direct electrical release of intact biomarkers from cells,” Lab Chip., May 21, 2014, 14(10):1785-1790. |
Ribas et al., “Dendritic cell vaccination combined with CTLA4 blockade in patients with metastatic melanoma,” Clin Cancer Res., Oct. 1, 2019, 15(19):6267-6275. |
Sabel et al. “Immunologic Response to Cryoablation of Breast Cancer,” Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, Mar. 2005, 90(1):97-104. |
Sabel et al., “Cryo-Immunology: A review of the literature and proposed mechanisms for stumulatory versus suppressive immune responses,” Cryobiology, 2009, 58:1-11. |
Sale et al., “Effects of high electric fields on micro-organisms. 3. Lysis of erythrocytes and protoplasts,” Biochim Biophys Acta., Aug. 1968, 163(1):37-43. |
Schaft et al., “A new way to generate cytolytic tumor-specific T cells: electroporation of RNA coding for a T cell receptor into T lymphocytes,” Cancer Immunol Immunother., Sep. 2006,55(9):1132-1141. |
Shen et al., “Abstract 4746: Modulation of suppressive myeloid populations by tasquinimod,” Cancer Research, Apr. 15, 2013, 73:4746. |
Shipman, “Microneedle Sensors May Allow Real-Time Monitoring of Body Chemistry,” Dec. 13, 2011, [retrieved on May 15, 2019] retrieved from URL <https://news.ncsu.edu/2011/12/wmsnarayanmnsensors/>, 3 pages. |
Somolinos et al., “Inactivation of Escherichia coli by citral,” J Appl Microbiol., Jun. 2010,108(6):1928-1939. |
Somolinos et al., “sigB absence decreased Listeria monocytogenes EGD-e heat resistance but not its Pulsed Electric Fields resistance,” Int J Food Microbiol., Jun. 30, 2010, 141(1-2):32-38. |
Stevenson et al., “Relationship between cell membrane potential and natural killer cell cytolysis in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells,” Cancer Res., Sep. 1, 1989, 49(17):4842-4845. |
Tang et al., “Steep pulsed electric fields modulate cell apoptosis through the change of intracellular calcium concentration,” Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces., Jun. 15, 2007, 57(2):209-214. |
Tarek, “Membrane Electroporation: a molecular dynamics Simulation,” Biophys J., 2005, 88:4045-4053. |
Traitcheva et al., “Electroporation and alternating current cause membrane permeation of photodynamic cytotoxins yielding necrosis and apoptosis of cancer cells,” Bioelectrochemistry., Oct. 2010, 79(2):257-260. |
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, “Kinetics of Microbial Inactivation for Alternative Food Processing Technologies—Pulsed Electric Fields”, A Report of the Institute of Food Technologists for the Food and Drug Administration of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Mar. 29, 2000, 108 pages. |
Veiga et al., “Exposure of human leukemic cells to direct electric current: generation of toxic compounds inducing cell death by different mechanisms,” Cell Biochem Biophys., 2005, 42(1):61-74. |
Vora et al., “Interstitial implant with interstitial hyperthermia,” Cancer, Dec. 1, 1982, 50(11):2518-2523. |
Waitz et al. “Potent Induction of Tumor Immunity by Combining Tumor Cryoablation with Anti-CTLA-4 Therapy”, Cancer Res., Jan. 2012, 72(2):430-439. |
Williams et al., “Gene therapy approaches to prolonging corneal allograft survival,” Expert Opin Biol Ther., Jul. 2004, 4(7):1059-1071. |
Wouters et al., “Membrane permeabilization in relation to inactivation kinetics of Lactobacillus species due to pulsed electric fields,” Appl Environ Microbiol., Jul. 2001, 67(7):3092-3101. |
Yuan et al., “Immunologic responses to xenogeneic tyrosinase DNA vaccine administered by electroporation in patients with malignant melanoma,” J Immunother Cancer, Nov. 18, 2013, 1:20. |
Zheng et al., “Membrane microfilter device for selective capture, electrolysis and genomic analysis of human circulating tumor cells,” J Chromatogr A., Aug. 31, 2007, 1162(2):154-61. |
PRNewswire.com, “Image Guided Cancer Specialists Reports Successful Early Results from Cryoablation and Intra-tumoral Injection of Immunotherapy Drug Combination Yervoy and Keytruda for the Treatment of Cancer,” Feb. 3, 2015, retrieved Nov. 17, 2020 from URL <https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/image-guided-cancer-specialists-reports-successful-early-results-from-cryoablation-and-intra-tumoral-injection-of-immunotherapy-drug-combination-yerivoy-and-keytruda-for-the-treatment-of-cancer-300029347.html>, 3 pages. |
Williams, “The Immunotherapy Revolution: The Best New Hope for Saving Cancer Patients' Lives,” Gatekeeper Press, Nov. 30, 2019, 115 pages. |
AU Office Action in Australian Appln. No. 2020200688, dated Jun. 18, 2020, 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/101,434, filed Nov. 23, 2020, Onik et al. |
Aarts et al., “Cryoablation and immunotherapy: an overview of evidence on its synergy,” Insights Into Imaging, Dec. 2019, 10(1), 12 pages. |
Abdo et al. “Immunotherapy plus cryotherapy: potential augmented abscopal effect for advanced cancers,” Frontiers in Oncology, Mar. 28, 2018, 8:85. |
AMGen.com, “FDA Approves IMLYGIC™ (Talimogene Laherparepvec) as First Oncolytic Viral Therapy in the US,” retrieved Aug. 13, 2020 from URL <https://www.amgen.com/media/news-releases/2015/10/fda-approves-imlygic-talimogene-laherparepvec-as-first-oncolytic-viral-therapy-in-the-us/, Oct. 27, 2015, 7 pages. |
Arora et al., “Neoadjuvant Intratumoral Cytokine-Loaded Microspheres are Superior to Postoperative Autologous Cellular Vaccines in Generating Systematic Anti-Tumor Immunity,” Journal of Surgical Oncology 94(5):403-412, dated Oct. 1, 2006. |
Bastianpillai et al., “Harnessing the immunomodulatory effect of thermal and non-thermal ablative therapies for cancer treatment,” Tumor Biology, Dec. 1, 2015, 36(12):9137-46. |
Bulvik et al., “Irreversible electroporation versus radiofrequency ablation: a comparison of local and systemic effects in a small-animal model,” Radiology, Aug. 2016, 280(2):413-24. |
Chang et al., “Blocking of the PD-1/PD-L1 Interaction by ad-Peptide Antagonist for Cancer Immunotherapy,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Sep. 28, 2015, 54(40):11760-4. |
EP Extended Search Report in European Appln. No. 17739066.3, dated Dec. 16, 2019, 20 pages. |
EP European Search Report in European Application No. 17739066, dated Aug. 13, 2019, 23 pages. |
Fehres et al., “Understanding the Biology of Antigen Cross-Presentation for the Design of Vaccines Against Cancer,” Frontiers in Immunology, Apr. 8, 2014, 5(149):1-10. |
Immuno-OncologyNews.com, “Cryoablation Combined With Intra-tumoral Injection of Immunotherapeutic Drugs Offers Promising Outcomes,” Feb. 10, 2015, 2 pages. |
Ito et al., “Immune adjuvant activity of pre-resectional radiofrequency ablation protects against local and systemic recurrence in aggressive murine colorectal cancer,” PLoS One, Nov. 23, 2015, 10(11):e0143370, 23 pages. |
Jonathan et al., “Systemic Antitumor Effects of Intratumoral Administration of the Novel Immunotherapeutic Combination Anti-CTLA4, Anti-CD137, and Anti-OX40 in Mouse Models of Lymphoma and Solid Tumor,” Blood, Jan. 1, 2015, 126(23):1552. |
Koster et el., “Recent developments and future challenges in immune checkpoint inhibitory cancer treatment,” Curr Opin Oncol., Nov. 2015, 27(6):482-488. |
Machlenkin et al., “Combined dendritic cell cryotherapy of tumor induces systemic antimetastatic immunity,” Clinical Cancer Research, Jul. 1, 2005, 11(13):4955-61. |
Marabelle et al., “Intratumoral anti-CTLA-4 therapy: enhancing efficacy while avoiding toxicity,” Clinical Cancer Research,Oct. 1, 2013, 19(19):5261, 4 pages. |
Marabelle et al., “Intratumoral immunization: a new paradigm for cancer therapy,” Clinical Cancer Research, Apr. 1, 2014, 20(7):1747-56. |
Marabelle et al., “Intratumoral immunotherapy: using the tumor as teh remedy,” Annals of Oncology, Dec. 1, 2017, 28:xii33-43, 11 pages. |
Marabelle et al., “Starting the fight in the tumor: expert recommendations for the development of human intratumoral immunotherapy (HIT-IT),” Annals of Oncology, Nov. 1, 2018, 29(11):2163-74. |
Mizukoshi et al., “Enhancement of tumor-associated antigen-specific T cell responses by radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma,” Hepatology, Apr. 2013, 57(4):1448-57. |
Paiella et al., “Local ablative strategies for ductal pancreatic cancer (radiofrequency ablation, irreversible electroporation): a review,” Gastroenterology Research and Practice, Oct. 2016, vol. 2016, 10 pages. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability in International Application No. PCT/US2017/013486, dated Jul. 17, 2018, 33 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US2017/013486, dated May 19, 2017, 38 pages. |
Rosenberg et al., “Image guided cryoablation of cancer with intra-tumoral injection of anti-CTLA-4 and PD-1 immune check-point inhibitors,” Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer, Dec. 2015, 3(2):1-4. |
Shi et al., “PD-1 blockade boosts radiofrequency ablation-elicited adaptive immune responses against tumor,” Clinical Cancer Research, Mar. 1, 2016, 22(5):1173-84. |
Sidana, “Cancer immunotherapy using tumor cryoablation,” Immunotherapy, Jan. 2014, 6(1):85-93. |
Somasundaram et al., “Nivolumab in Combination with Ipilimumab for the Treatment of Melanoma. Expert Review of Anti-Cancer Therapy,” 15(10):1-13, dated Oct. 2015. |
Waitz et al., “CTLA-4 blockade synergizes with cryoablation to mediate tumor rejection,” Oncoimmunology, Jul. 1, 2012, 1(4):544-6. |
Wang et al., “In Vitro Characterization of the Anti-PD-1 Antibody Nivolumab, BMS-936558, and In Vivo Toxicology in Non-Human Primates,” Cancer Immunology Research 2(9):846-856, dated May 28, 2014. |
Woolley et al., “Effect of Freezing Parameters (Freeze Cycle and Thaw Process) on Tissue Destruction Following Renal Cryoablation,” Journal of Endourology 16(7):519-522, dated Sep. 2002. |
Yu et al., “Treatment of osteosarcoma with microwave thermal ablation to induce immunogenic cell death,” Oncotarget, Aug. 2014, 5(15):6526-39. |
Zhou et al., “Structural repertoire of HIV-1-neutralizing antibodies targeting the CD4 supersite in 14 donors,” Cell, Jun. 4, 2015, 161(6):1280-92. |
CA Office Action in Canadian Appln. No. 2,932,765, dated Jul. 5, 2022, 7 pages. |
CA Office Action in Canadian Appln. No. 2,975,123, dated Feb. 8, 2022, 4 pages. |
Carosella et al., “A systematic review of immunotherapy in urologic cancer: evolving roles for targeting of CTLA-4, PD-1/PD-L1, and HLA-G,” European Urology, Aug. 1, 2015, 68(2):267-79. |
Chen et al., “Intratumoural GM-CSF microspheres and CTLA-4 blockade enhance the antitumour immunity induced by thermal ablation in a subcutaneous murine hepatoma model,” International Journal of Hyperthermia, Jan. 1, 2009, 25(5):374-82. |
CN Office Action in Chinese Appln. No. 201780012169.0, dated Mar. 14, 2022, 11 pages. |
JP Japanese Office Action in Japanese Appln. No. 2018-555838, dated Jan. 24, 2022, 9 pages (with English translation). |
JP Office action in Japanese Appln. No. 2016-536858, dated Nov. 12, 2019, 29 pages (with english translation). |
Wikipedia.com [online], “Irreversible Electroporation,” Sep. 8, 2018, retrieved on Sep. 11, 2019, retrieved from URL <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irreversible_electroporation>, 13 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200038093 A1 | Feb 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61912172 | Dec 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15102120 | US | |
Child | 16597249 | US | |
Parent | 14451333 | Aug 2014 | US |
Child | 15102120 | US |