The present patent application is a national phase application of International Application No. PCT/NZ2010/000062, filed Apr. 1, 2010.
This invention relates to automated methods of cutting an animal carcass and apparatus therefor.
There is a general need to automate the processing of animal carcasses into required cuts. The manual butchering of animal carcasses requires skill and judgement in the manipulation of both meat and tools. With skilled staff manual butchering methods are able to produce a relatively high standard of butchered meat product. However, these methods can be time consuming and a considerable amount of training is required to achieve good results. Furthermore, the skill and judgement of the butcher can falter, resulting in an inaccurately butchered meat product and reduced yield or injury to the butcher. Human contact with the carcass also increases the risk of bacterial contamination of the meat product. Manual processing is also costly and working hours may be inflexible.
There has therefore been an effort to automate the butchering of animal carcasses, particularly in large-scale commercial slaughtering/butchering operations. Automated carcass cutting methods have reduced butchering time and butcher injury. However, such systems have been expensive and are typically only capable of performing a limited number of the required processing operations, require transfer between manual and automated processes and are often not adapted to take into account variations between different animal carcasses. Such systems may also create processing bottlenecks—particularly where manual processing cannot be performed at the rate of automated processing.
A significant problem preventing, the full automation of animal carcass cutting operations has been the absence of an end to end system capable of performing all major processing cuts. Prior systems have not been truly integrated so that product and information flows with processing. Whilst X-ray and vision systems have been employed these have not been integrated in an end to end system.
It is an object of the present invention to provide meat processing methods and apparatus overcoming at least some of these disadvantages or to at least provide the public with a useful choice.
According to one aspect there is provided a method of processing a portion of a carcass including the steps of:
According to another aspect there is provided a carcass cutting apparatus including:
According to another aspect there is provided a carcass cutting apparatus including:
According to another aspect there is provided a method of removing a spinal cord from a carcass portion in which the spinal cord has been cut at each end including the steps of:
According to another aspect there is provided a method of performing a longitudinal cut along a saddle section of a carcass including the steps of:
According to another aspect there is provided a method of cutting a saddle section of a carcass including the steps of:
According to another aspect there is provided a method of processing a carcass including the steps of:
According to another aspect there is provided a method of processing carcass portions comprising:
According to another aspect there is provided a meat processing system including:
According to another aspect there is provided a method of performing a plurality of sequential cuts on a carcass using computer controlled cutting apparatus including the steps of:
The accompanying drawings which are incorporated in and constitute part of the specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the general description of the invention given above, and the detailed description of embodiments given below, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
The system shown in
A robotic arm 3 transfers a fore-quarter section 4 from fore-quarter primal cutting section 1 to conveyor 5. Whilst robotic arms 3 and 18 are shown in this embodiment simpler purpose-built transfer mechanisms could be employed. Robotic arm 3 may place fore-quarter section cut side down so that it sits in a known orientation on conveyor 5. Conveyor 5 may be indexed so that robotic arms 6 to 9 may acquire a fore-quarter section at a known position on the conveyor. Alternatively sensors may be used to detect the position of a fore-quarter section and acquire it. Alternatively fore-quarter sections could be deposited into containers on a conveyor adapted to hold the fore-quarter sections in a desired orientation.
Referring now to
Once the fore-quarter section is firmly secured to robotic arm 6 the fore-quarter section is moved to be imaged by optical imaging apparatus 14 as shown in
The imaging apparatus may project structured light onto the fore-quarter section and multiple images may be acquired to develop a true three dimensional model. To achieve this a laser line may scan across the fore-quarter section with images captured at regular intervals to acquire a true three dimensional image in each orientation.
A datum referencing device 15 in the form of three orthogonally disposed reference points (balls in this case) may be attached to the end of robotic arm 6 so that the images captured by imaging apparatus 14 may be referenced to the robotic arm.
After imaging the robotic arm 6 moves the fore-quarter section with respect to the blade of a bandsaw 16 to perform any or all of a knuckle cut, neck cut, brisket cut, shank cut, vertebrae split, and any other desired cut. Depending upon the arrangement the bandsaw may be rotatable through 90 degrees to facilitate the vertebrae split.
It is to be appreciated that from the fore-quarter section being acquired by robotic arm 6 it is continuously held in a fixed relationship to robotic arm 6 throughout imaging and multiple cutting operations; thus avoiding the need to re-index the position of the fore-quarter section with respect to the robotic arm which would occur were the fore-quarter section to be transferred between the various operations.
Referring now to
After imaging the spinal cord is removed as shown schematically in
The probe 29 and cup 32 may be positioned according to standard anatomical positioning for a particular species where supports 20 and 21 centralise the spinal column to an acceptable tolerance or alternatively they may be positioned utilizing imaging information from cameras 27 and 28 and suitable positioning mechanisms.
Once the spinal column is removed support 19 advances to a saddle cutting station, station 23 in this case as shown in
When the saddle section 31 is in the desired position it may be held via a plurality of grippers 36 to 41 actuated by hydraulic or pneumatic rams 42 to 48 which hold the ribs of saddle section 31 against bar 49 so as to firmly hold the saddle section 31 during cross and flap cuts. A similar gripping arrangement is provided on the opposite side. The use, of multiple grippers has been found to hold the ribs of the flaps more effectively than a single gripper. As shown in
Finally a vertebrae cut is performed as shown in
Referring now to
In
The carcass portions may be continuously advanced along linear conveyor 62 and processed as they move or may be stopped for processing at certain locations or a combination of both. Carcass portion 86 may be advanced through rotary cutter blades 77 and 78 to perform brisket and or flap cuts or carcass portion 86 may be held in a stationary position and apparatus of the type shown in
There are thus provided an integrated automated meat processing system allowing fully automated end to end processing. By allowing scalability of sub-processing stations to the desired processing rate equipment utilization may be optimized and bottlenecks avoided. As information flows with processing it may be used and combined with additional information at each stage of processing. This arrangement also provides enhanced traceability of product to each sub-processing station.
Fully automated processing provides increased accuracy resulting in enhanced product yield and value. This may be achieved using X-ray and optical information, optimized cutting path calculation and robotic accuracy. Robotic processing avoids labour related expenses and allows greater flexibility in operating schedules.
By minimizing product transfer multiple processing steps may be performed without requiring re-indexing of the carcass portion position and orientation with respect to processing equipment. By imaging a carcass portion whilst it is held by a robotic arm cutting paths may be easily determined with respect to the robotic arm without requiring indexing of image information to a robotic arm where a carcass portion is acquired after imaging.
There is also provided a method of effectively removing the spinal cord without requiring splitting of the spinal column.
While the present invention has been illustrated by the description of the embodiments thereof, and while the embodiments have been described in detail, it is not the intention of the applicant to restrict or in any way limit the scope of the appended claims to such detail. Additional advantages and modifications will readily appear to those skilled in the art. Therefore, the invention in its broader aspects is not limited to the specific details, representative apparatus and method, and illustrative examples shown and described. Accordingly, departures may be made from such details without departure from the spirit or scope of the applicant's general inventive concept.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
576070 | Apr 2009 | NZ | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/NZ2010/000062 | 4/1/2010 | WO | 00 | 10/3/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/114397 | 10/7/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4209878 | Albert | Jul 1980 | A |
4389749 | Korhonen | Jun 1983 | A |
4847954 | Lapeyre et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4875254 | Rudy et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
5194036 | Chevalier et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5314375 | O'Brien et al. | May 1994 | A |
5372540 | Burch et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5746648 | Boeyen et al. | May 1998 | A |
5853320 | Wathes et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
RE36664 | O'Brien et al. | Apr 2000 | E |
6354933 | Archambault et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
7251537 | Blaine et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7285040 | Ilch et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7404759 | Sato | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7623249 | Sandberg et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7651388 | Faires et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7841264 | Kim et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20020155803 | Tieleman | Oct 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10150394 | Apr 2003 | DE |
2759866 | Aug 1998 | FR |
2427121 | Dec 2006 | GB |
WO-2008010732 | Jan 2008 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120040597 A1 | Feb 2012 | US |