Catheter with removable vision probe

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11684758
  • Patent Number
    11,684,758
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, April 30, 2020
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 27, 2023
    10 months ago
Abstract
A robotic system comprises an instrument including proximal distal sections. The distal section comprises a steerable segment and a distal tip. The instrument also includes a main lumen and a pull wire. The system also comprises a sensor to detect a position of the distal tip of the instrument and a computing device that causes the system to record a position of a working configuration of the distal tip, determine, based on a sensor signal, a movement of the distal tip in response to insertion of a probe into the main lumen, and generate a control signal based on the determined movement. The system also comprises a drive interface connected to the pull wire at the proximal section of the instrument. The drive interface adjusts a tensioning of the pull wire based on the control signal to return the distal tip towards the working configuration recorded before the movement occurred.
Description
BACKGROUND

Medical devices that navigate body lumens need to be physically small enough to fit within the lumen. Lung catheters, for example, which may be used to perform minimally invasive lung biopsies or other medical procedures, may need to follow airways that decrease in size as the catheter navigates branching passages. To reach a target location in a lung, a catheter may need to follow passages having diameters as small as 3 mm or less. Manufacturing a catheter that includes the mechanical structures suitable for remote or robotic operation and that has a diameter that is sufficiently small to navigate such small lumens can be challenging. In particular, one desirable configuration for remotely operated catheter would provide a tool mounted on a steerable segment; tendons or pull wires that extend down the length of the catheter to an external drive system that pulls on the tendons to actuate the tool or steerable segment; lumens for suction and/or irrigation; a vision system for viewing of the target location; and sensors to identify the location of the instrument relative to a patient's body. Accommodating all of the desired features and elements of a lung catheter or other device having a diameter about 3 mm or less can be difficult.


SUMMARY

In accordance with an aspect of the invention, a catheter system has a removable vision probe that can be replaced with a biopsy probe or other medical probe. The vision probe may be used for navigation to a work site and then removed and replaced with the biopsy probe that takes a tissue sample. The catheter system can thus provide a high level of vision and medical functionality in a small diameter. Control logic for robotic actuation of the catheter adjust for issues that may occur if the catheter moves while the tools or probes are swapped or if the patient moves. In particular, when the vision probe is removed, feedback control and a distal sensor (such as a fiber-optic shape sensor) are used to maintain or return to the desired location or working configuration for use of the biopsy probe. The feedback information from the sensor thus can be used to control the actuator tendons such that the working configuration of a distal tip of the catheter is maintained even under disturbances due to tool removal or anatomy motion. In this way, accuracy of the catheter system is maintained and biopsy yield may be improved. Instead of maintaining a constant working configuration, parameters of the desired working configuration can be recorded, and the catheter can be straightened or relaxed for easier removal and insertion of probes and subsequently returned to the desired working configuration after a new probe has been inserted or upon user indication.


One specific embodiment of the invention is a medical system including a catheter and control logic. The catheter includes a main lumen and a mechanical system. The main lumen accommodates either a vision probe or a medical probe and is too narrow to simultaneously guide both a vision probe and a medical probe to the distal tip. The control logic operates the mechanical system to control a pose of a distal tip of the catheter. In particular, the control logic can identify a desired working configuration of the distal tip while the vision probe is deployed and can hold or return the catheter to the desired working configuration when the vision probe has been removed from the catheter and the medical probe is deployed in the main lumen.


Another specific embodiment of the invention is a medical system including a removable vision probe and a catheter. The catheter has a lumen sized to guide either the vision system or a medical tool to a distal tip of the catheter. Further, the catheter has a width less than about 3 mm and is too narrow to simultaneously guide both the vision probe and the medical probe to the distal tip.


Yet another embodiment of the invention is a process that includes: using a vision probe deployed in a catheter when identifying a working configuration of a distal tip of the catheter, removing the vision probe from the catheter; deploying a medical probe in place of the vision probe that was removed; and actuating the catheter to maintain or return to the working configuration of the distal tip when a medical probe is deployed in the catheter in place of the vision probe.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows a robotic catheter system in accordance with an embodiment of the invention having multiple control modes.



FIG. 2 shows an embodiment of an actuated distal tip that can be employed in the system of FIG. 1.



FIGS. 3A and 3B show cross-sectional views of proximal and distal sections of a catheter in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.



FIG. 4 shows a cross-sectional view of a vision probe that may be deployed in the catheter of FIGS. 3A and 3B and swapped out for use of medical probes in the catheter shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B.



FIG. 5 is a flow diagram of a process for using the catheter system with a removable vision system and multiple control modes.



FIG. 6 is a flow diagram of a catheter control process in a steering mode.





Use of the same reference symbols in different figures indicates similar or identical items.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A catheter system can employ a vision probe that is interchangeable with one or more medical probes or tools. The vision probe can be removed and replaced with a medical probe used in a medical procedure. The interchanging of the vision and medical probes may permit the catheter system to have a smaller diameter and thus navigate smaller passages than would a similar system that simultaneously accommodates both vision and medical systems. Alternatively, interchanging probes allow more space for vision and medical systems having greater functionality than might a catheter that must simultaneously accommodate both vision and medical systems.


One method for using a catheter system includes steering a catheter along a body lumen for at least part of the path to a work site for a medical procedure. A vision system may then be deployed in the catheter during the steering and/or used to view the work site reached when navigation is complete. The vision system can also be used to help identify a desired working configuration for the catheter and when manipulating the catheter into the desired working configuration. The control system of the catheter can then record the working configuration and may be placed in a “holding” mode in which the pose of the catheter relative to a patient is monitored and the catheter is actuated to actively maintain or return to the recorded working configuration. The control system may provide different types of control modes, which may be useful for different types of medical probes or different types of medical procedures. For example, if the medical probe includes a laser, a combination of the location and orientation of the distal tip of the catheter can be controlled so that the distal tip remains targeted on a specific location in the patient. An alternative holding mode can maintain the location of the distal tip of the catheter while permitting the orientation of the distal tip to change or maintain a distal tip along a line.



FIG. 1 schematically illustrates a catheter system 100 in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. In the illustrated embodiment, catheter system 100 includes a catheter 110, a drive interface 120, control logic 140, an operator interface 150, and a sensor system 160.


Catheter 110 is a generally flexible device having one or more lumens including a main lumen that can accommodate interchangeable probes such as described further below. Flexible catheters can be made using a braided structure such as a woven wire tube with inner or outer layers of a flexible or low friction material such as polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). In one embodiment, catheter 110 includes a bundle of lumens or tubes held together by a braided jacket and a reflowed (i.e., fused by melting) jacket of a material such as Polyether Block Amide (Pebax). Alternatively, an extrusion of a material such as Pebax can similarly be used to form multiple lumens in catheter 110. Catheter 110 particularly includes a main lumen for interchangeable probe systems and smaller lumens for pull wires and sensor lines. In the illustrated embodiment, catheter 110 has a proximal section 112 attached to drive interface 120 and a distal section 114 that extends from the proximal section 112. An additional steerable segment 116 (e.g., a metal structure such as shown in FIG. 2 and described further below) can form a distal subsection of distal section 114. Pull wires extend from drive system 120 through proximal section 112 and distal section 114 and connect to steerable segment 116.


The overall length of catheter 110 may be about 60 to 80 cm or longer with distal section 114 being about 15 cm long and steerable segment 116 being about 4 to 5 cm long. In accordance with an aspect of the invention, distal section 114 has a smaller diameter than does proximal section 112 and thus can navigate smaller natural lumens or passages. During a medical procedure, at least a portion of proximal section 112 and all of distal section 114 may be inserted along a natural lumen such as an airway of a patient. The smaller diameter of distal section 114 permits use of distal section 114 in lumens that may be too small for proximal section 112, but the larger diameter of distal section 114 facilitates inclusion of more or larger structures or devices such as electromagnetic (EM) sensors 162 that may not fit in distal section 114.


Steerable segment 116 is remotely controllable and particularly has a pitch and a yaw that can be controlled using pull wires. Steerable segment 116 may include all or part of distal section 114 and may be simply implemented as a multi-lumen tube of flexible material such as Pebax. In general, steerable segment 116 is more flexible than the remainder of catheter 110, which assists in isolating actuation or bending to steerable segment 116 when drive interface 120 pulls on actuating tendons. Catheter 110 can also employ additional features or structures such as use of Bowden cables for actuating tendons to prevent actuation from bending proximal section 112 (or bending any portion the section of 114 other than steerable segment 116) of catheter 110. FIG. 2 shows one specific embodiment in which steerable segment 116 is made from a tube 210 that in catheter 110 of FIG. 1 contains multiple tubes defining a main lumen for a probe system and smaller lumens for actuation tendons 230 and a shape sensor not shown in FIG. 2. In the illustrated embodiment, tendons 230 are placed 90° apart surrounding lumen 312 to facilitate steering catheter 110 in pitch and yaw directions defined by the locations of tendons 230. A reflowed jacket, which is not shown in FIG. 2 to better illustrate the internal structure of steerable segment 116, may also cover tube 210. As shown in FIG. 2, tube 210 is cut or formed to create a series of flexures 220. Tendons 230 connect to a distal tip 215 of steerable segment 116 and extend back to a drive interface 120. Tendons 230 can be wires, cables, Bowden cables, hypotubes, or any other structures that are able to transfer force from drive interface 120 to distal tip 215 and limit bending of proximal section 112 when drive interface 120 pulls on tendons 230. In operation, pulling harder on any one of tendons 230 tends to cause steerable segment 116 to bend in the direction of that tendon 230. To accommodate repeated bending, tube 210 may be made of a material such as Nitinol, which is a metal alloy that can be repeatedly bent with little or no damage.


Drive interfaces 120 of FIG. 1, which pulls on tendons 230 to actuate steerable segment 116, includes a mechanical system or transmission 124 that converts the movement of actuators 122, e.g., electric motors, into movements of (or tensions in) tendons 230 that run through catheter 110 and connect to steerable segment 116. (Push rods could conceivably be used in catheter 110 instead of pull wires but may not provide a desirable level of flexibility.) The movement and pose of steerable segment 116 can thus be controlled through selection of drive signals for actuators 122 in drive interface 120. In addition to manipulating tendons 230, drive interface 120 may also be able to control other movement of catheter 110 such as range of motion in an insertion direction and rotation or roll of the proximal end of catheter 110, which may also be powered through actuators 122 and transmission 124. Backend mechanisms or transmissions that are known for flexible-shaft instruments could in general be used or modified for drive interface 120. For example, some known drive systems for flexible instruments are described in U.S. Pat. App. Pub. No. 2010/0331820, entitled “Compliant Surgical Device,” which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Drive interface 120 in addition to actuating catheter 110 should allow removal and replacements of probes in catheter 110, so that the drive structure should be out of the way during such operations.


A dock 126 in drive interface 120 can provide a mechanical coupling between drive interface 120 and catheter 110 and link actuation tendons to transmission 124. Dock 126 may additionally contain electronics for receiving and relaying sensor signals from portions of sensor system 160 in catheter 110 and contain an electronic or mechanical system for identifying the probe or the type of probe deployed in catheter 110.


Control logic 140 controls the actuators in drive interface 120 to selectively pull on the tendons as needed to actuate and steer steerable segment 116. In general, control logic 140 operates in response to commands from a user, e.g., a surgeon or other medical personnel using operator interface 150, and in response to measurement signals from sensor system 160. However, in holding modes as described further below, control logic 140 operates in response to measurement signals from sensor system 160 to maintain or acquire a previously identified working configuration. Control logic 140 may be implemented using a general purpose computer with suitable software, firmware, and/or interface hardware to interpret signals from operator interface 150 and sensor system 160 and to generate control signals for drive interface 120.


In the illustrated embodiment, control logic 140 includes multiple modules 141, 142, 143, and 144 that implement different processes for controlling the actuation of catheter 110. In particular, modules 141, 142, 143, and 144 respectively implement a position stiffening mode, an orientation stiffening mode, a target position mode, and a target axial mode, which are described further below. A module 146 selects which control process will be used and may base the selection on user input, the type or status of the probe deployed in catheter 110, and the task being performed. Control logic 140 also includes memory storing parameters 148 of a working configuration of steerable segment 116 that is desired for a task, and each of the modules 141, 142, 143, and 144 can uses their different control processes to actively maintain or hold the desired working configuration.


Operator interface 150 may include standard input/output hardware such as a display, a keyboard, a mouse, a joystick, or other pointing device or similar I/O hardware that may be customized or optimized for a surgical environment. In general, operator interface 150 provides information to the user and receives instructions from the user. For example, operator interface 150 may indicate the status of system 100 and provide the user with data including images and measurements made by system 100. One type of instruction that the user may provide through operator interface 150, e.g., using a joystick or similar controller, indicates the desired movement or position of steerable segment 116, and using such input, control logic 140 can generate control signals for actuators in drive interface 120. Other instructions from the user can select an operating mode of control logic 140.


Sensor system 160 generally measures a pose of steerable segment 116. In the illustrated embodiment, sensor system 160 includes EM sensors 162 and a shape sensor 164. EM sensors 162 include one or more conductive coils that may be subjected to an externally generated electromagnetic field. Each coil of EM sensors 162 then produces an induced electrical signal having characteristics that depend on the position and orientation of the coil relative to the externally generated electromagnetic field. In an exemplary embodiment, EM sensors 162 are configured and positioned to measure six degrees of freedom, e.g., three position coordinates X, Y, and Z and three orientation angles indicating pitch, yaw, and roll of a base point. The base point in system 100 is at or near the end of proximal section 112 and the start of distal section 114 of catheter 110. Shape sensor 164 in the exemplary embodiment of the invention includes a fiber grating that permits determination of the shape of a portion of catheter 110 extending from the base point, e.g., the shape of distal section 114 or steerable segment 116. Such shape sensors using fiber gratings are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,720,322, entitled “Fiber Optic Shape Sensor” and U.S. Pat. No. 7,930,065, entitled “Robotic Surgery System Including Position Sensors using Fiber Bragg Gratings,” which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. An advantage of the illustrated type of sensor system 160 is that EM sensors 162 can provide measurements relative to the externally generated electrical field, which can be calibrated relative to a patient's body. Thus, system 160 can use EM sensors 162 to reliably measure the position and orientation of a base point for shape sensor 164, and shape sensor 164 need only provide shape measurement for a relatively short distance. Additionally, distal section 114 only contains shape sensor 164 and may have a diameter that is smaller than the diameter of proximal section 112. More generally, sensor system 160 need only be able to measure the pose of steerable segment 116, and other types of sensors could be employed.



FIGS. 3A and 3B respectively show cross-sections of the proximal and distal sections 112 and 114 of catheter 110 in one embodiment of the invention. FIG. 3A shows an embodiment of catheter 110 having a body 310 that includes a main lumen 312 for a vision or medical probe, lumens 314 containing tendons 230, lumens 316 containing EM sensors 162 or associated signal wires, and a lumen 318 containing a fiber shape sensor 164. Main lumen 312, wire lumens 314, and a shape sensor lumen 318 extend into distal section 114 as shown in FIG. 3B, but lumens 316 for EM sensors 162 are not needed in distal section 114 because EM sensors 162 are only in proximal section 112. Accordingly, distal section 114 can be smaller than proximal section 112. In an exemplary embodiment, body 310 in proximal section 112 has an outer diameter of about 4 mm (e.g., in a range from 3 to 6 mm) and provides main lumen 312 with a diameter of about 2 mm (e.g., in a range from 1 to 3 mm) and in distal section 114 has an outer diameter of about 3 mm (e.g., in a range from 2 to 4 mm) while maintaining the diameter of main lumen 312 at about 2 mm. A smooth taper (as shown in FIG. 1) or an abrupt step in body 310 can be used at the transition from the larger diameter of proximal section 112 to the smaller diameter of distal section 116.


The specific dimensions described in above are primarily for a catheter that accommodates probes having a diameter of 2 mm, which is a standard size for existing medical tools such as lung biopsy probes. However, alternative embodiments of the invention could be made larger or smaller to accommodate medical probes with a larger or smaller diameter, e.g., 1 mm diameter probes. A particular advantage of such embodiments is that a high level of functionality is provided in a catheter with relative small outer diameter when compared to the size of probe used in the catheter.



FIGS. 3A and 3B also show a sheath 360 that may be employed between catheter body 310 and a probe in main lumen 312. In one embodiment of catheter 110, sheath 360 is movable relative to body 310 can be extended beyond the end of steerable segment 116. This may be advantageous in some medical procedures because sheath 360 is even smaller than distal section 114 and therefore may fit into smaller natural lumens or passages. For example, if catheter 110 reaches a branching of lumens that are too small to accommodate steerable segment 116, steerable segment 116 may be pointed in the direction of the desired branch, so that sheath 360 can be pushed beyond the end of steerable segment 116 and into that branch. Sheath 360 could thus reliably guide a medical probe into the desired branch. However, sheath 360 is passive in that it is not directly actuated or steerable. In contrast, distal section 114 accommodates pull wires 230 that connect to steerable segment 116 and can be manipulated to steer or pose steerable segment 116. In some medical applications, the active control of steerable segment 116 is desirable or necessary during a medical procedure, and passive sheath 360 may not be used in some embodiments of the invention.


Main lumen 312 is sized to accommodate a variety of medical probes. One specific probe is a vision probe 400 such as illustrated in FIG. 4. Vision probe 400 has a flexible body 410 with an outer diameter (e.g., about 2 mm) that fits within the main lumen of catheter 110 and with multiple inner lumens that contain the structures of vision probe 400. Body 410 may be formed using an extruded flexible material such as Pebax, which allows creation of multiple lumens. In the illustrated embodiment, the structure of vision probe 400 includes a CMOS camera 420, which is at the distal end of the probe and connected through one or more signal wires (not shown) that extend along the length of vision probe 400, e.g., to provide a video signal to control logic 140 or operator interface 150 as shown in FIG. 1. Vision probe 400 also includes illumination fibers 430 that provide light for imaging within a body lumen and fluid ports 326 for suction and irrigation that may be useful, for example, for rinsing of a lens of camera 420. Vision probe 400 may additionally include an electromagnetic sensor (not shown) embedded just proximally to camera 420 to provide additional pose information about the tip of vision probe 400.


Vision probe 400 is adapted to be inserted or removed from catheter 110 while catheter 110 is in use for a medical procedure. Accordingly, vision probe 400 is generally free to move relative to catheter 110. While movement relative to catheter 110 is necessary or desirable during insertion or removal of vision probe 400, the orientation of a vision probe 400 (and some medical probes) may need to be known for optimal or easier use. For example, a user viewing video from vision probe 400 and operating a controller similar to a joystick to steer catheter 110 generally expects the directions of movement of the controller to correspond to the response of steerable segment 116 and the resulting change in the image from vision probe 400. Operator interface 150 needs (or at least can use) information on the orientation of vision probe 400 relative to tendons 230 in order to provide a consistency in directions used in the user interface. In accordance with an aspect of the invention, a keying system (not shown) can fix vision probe 400 into a known orientation relative to catheter 110 and tendons 230. The keying system may, for example, include a spring, fixed protrusion, or latch on vision probe 400 or steerable segment 116 and a complementary notch or feature in steerable segment 116 or vision probe 400.


Vision probe 400 is only one example of a probe system that may be deployed in catheter 110 or guided through catheter 110 to a work site. Other probe systems that may be used include, but are not limited to, biopsy forceps, biopsy needles, biopsy brushes, ablation lasers, and radial ultrasound probes. In general, catheter 110 can be used with existing manual medical probes that are commercially available from medical companies such as Olympus Europa Holding GmbH.


The catheter system 100 of FIG. 1 can be used in procedures that swap a vision probe and a medical probe. FIG. 5 is a flow diagram of one embodiment of a process 500 for using the catheter system 100 of FIG. 1. In process 500, vision probe 400 is deployed in catheter 110 in step 510, and catheter 110 is inserted along a path including a natural lumen of a patient. For example, for a lung biopsy, steerable segment 116 of catheter 110 may be introduced through the mouth of a patient into the respiratory tract of the patient. Vision probe 400 when fully deployed in catheter 110 may fit into a keying structure that keeps vision probe 400 in a desired orientation at or even extending beyond steerable segment 116 to provide a good forward view from the steerable segment 116 of catheter 110. As noted above, steerable segment 116 of catheter 110 is steerable, and vision probe 320 can provide video of the respiratory tract that helps a user when navigating catheter 110 toward a target work site. However, use of vision probe 400 during navigation is not strictly necessary since navigation of catheter 110 may be possible using measurements of sensor system 160 or some other system with or without vision probe 400 being deployed or used in catheter 110. The path followed to the work site may be entirely within natural lumens such as the airways of the respiratory track or may pierce and pass through tissue at one or more points.


When steerable segment 116 reaches the target work site, vision probe 400 can be used to view the work site as in step 530 and to pose steerable segment 116 for performance of a task at the target work site as in step 540. Posing of steerable segment 116 may use images or visual information from vision probe 400 and measurements from sensor system 160 to characterize the work site and determine the desired working configuration. The desired working configuration may also depend on the type of tool that will be used or the next medical task. For example, reaching a desired working configuration of catheter 110 may bring the distal tip of steerable segment 116 into contact with tissue to be treated, sampled, or removed with a medical tool that replaces vision probe 400 in catheter 110. Another type of working configuration may point steerable segment 116 at target tissue to be removed using an ablation laser. For example, tissue could be targeted in one or more 2D camera views while vision probe 400 is still in place in catheter 110, or target tissue can be located on a virtual view of the work site using pre-operative 3D imaging data together with the position sensing relative to patient anatomy. Still another type of working configuration may define a line for the insertion of a needle or other medical tool into tissue, and the working configuration includes poses in which the distal tip of steerable segment 116 is along the target line. In general, the desired working configuration defines constraints on the position or the orientation of the distal tip of steerable segment 116, and the shape of more proximal sections of catheter 110 is not similarly constrained and may vary as necessary to accommodate the patient.


Step 550 stores in memory of the control logic parameters that identify the desired working configuration. For example, the position of a distal tip or target tissue can be defined using three coordinates. A target line for a need can be defined using the coordinates of a point on the line and angles indicating the direction of the line from that point. In general, control logic 120 uses the stored parameters that define the desired working configuration when operating in a holding mode that maintains steerable segment 116 of catheter 110 in the desired working configuration as described further below.


Step 560 selects and activates a holding mode of the catheter system after the desired working configuration has been established and recorded. Control logic 140 for catheter 110 of FIG. 1 may have one or more modules 141, 142, 143, and 144 implementing multiple stiffening modes that may be used as holding modes when the desired configuration of steerable segment 116 has fixed constraints. The available control modes may include one or more of the following.


1.) A position stiffness mode compares the position of the distal tip of steerable segment 116 as measured by sensor system 160 to a desired tip position and controls the actuators to minimize the difference in desired and measured tip positions. The position stiffness mode may particularly be suitable for general manipulation tasks in which the user tries to precisely control the position of the tip and for situations where the distal tip contacts tissue.


2.) An orientation stiffness mode compares the measured orientation or pointing direction of the distal tip to a desired pointing direction of the distal tip and controls the actuators to minimize the difference in desired and actual tip pointing direction. This orientation stiffening that may be suitable, e.g., when controlling an imaging device such as vision probe 400 attached steerable segment 116, in which case the viewing direction is kept as desired, while the exact position of steerable segment 116 may be less important.


3.) A target position stiffness mode uses a combination of the measured tip position and pointing direction to control catheter 110 to always point the distal tip of steerable segment 116 towards a specified target point some distance in front of steerable segment 116. In case of external disturbances, control logic 140 may control the actuators to implement this target position stiffening behavior, which may be suitable, e.g., when a medical probe inserted though the catheter contains an ablation laser that should always be aimed at a target ablation point in tissue.


4.) A target axial motion stiffness mode uses a combination of the measured tip position and pointing direction to ensure that the distal tip of steerable segment 116 is always on a line in space and has a pointing direction that is also along that line. This mode can be useful, e.g., when inserting a biopsy needle along a specified line into tissue. Tissue reaction forces could cause the flexible section of catheter 110 to bend while inserting the needle, but this control strategy would ensure that the needle is always along the right line.


The selection of a mode in step 560 could be made through manual selection by the user, based on the type of probe that is being used (e.g., grasper, camera, laser, or needle) in catheter 110, or based on the activity catheter 110 is performing. For example, when a laser is deployed in catheter 110, control logic 120 may operate in position stiffness mode when the laser deployed in catheter 110 is off and operate in target position stiffness mode to focus the laser on a desired target when the laser is on. When “holding” is activated, control logic 140 uses the stored parameters of the working configuration (instead of immediate input from operator interface 150) in generating control signals for drive interface 120.


The vision probe is removed from the catheter in step 570, which clears the main lumen of catheter 110 for the step 580 of inserting a medical probe or tool through catheter 110. For the specific step order shown in FIG. 5, control logic 140 operates in holding mode and maintains steerable segment 116 in the desired working configuration while the vision system is removed (step 570) and the medical probe is inserted (step 580). Accordingly, when the medical probe is fully deployed, e.g., reaches the end of steerable segment 116, the medical probe will be in the desired working configuration, and performance of the medical task as in step 590 can be then performed without further need or use of the removed vision probe. Once the medical task is completed, the catheter can be taken out of holding mode or otherwise relaxed so that the medical probe can be removed. The catheter can then be removed from the patient if the medical procedure is complete, or the vision or another probe can be inserted through the catheter if further medical tasks are desired.


In one alternative for the step order of process 500, catheter 110 may not be in a holding mode while the medical probe is inserted but can be switched to holding mode after the medical probe is fully deployed. For example, catheter 110 may be relaxed or straightened for easy remove of vision probe 400 (step 570) and insertion of the medical probe (step 580). Once holding mode is initiated, e.g., after insertion of the medical probe, control logic 140 will control the drive interface 130 to return steerable segment 116 to the desired working configuration if steerable segment 116 has moved since being posed in the desired working configuration. Thereafter, control logic 140 monitors the pose of steerable segment 116 and actively maintains steerable segment 116 in the desired working configuration while the medical task is performed in step 590.



FIG. 6 shows a flow diagram of a process 600 of a holding mode that can be implemented in control logic 140 of FIG. 1. Process 600 begins in step 610 with receipt of measurement signals from sensor system 160. The particular measurements required depend on the type of holding mode being implemented, but as an example, the measurements can indicate position coordinates, e.g., rectangular coordinates X, Y, and Z, of the distal tip of steerable segment 116 and orientation angles, e.g., angles θX, θY, and θZ of a center axis of the distal tip of steerable segment 116 relative to coordinate axes X, Y, and Z. Other coordinate systems and methods for representing the pose of steerable segment 116 could be used, and measurements of all coordinates and direction angles may not be necessary. However, in an exemplary embodiment, sensor system 160 is capable of measuring six degrees of freedom (DoF) of the distal tip of steerable segment 116 and of providing those measurements to control logic 140 in step 610.


Control logic 140 in step 620 determines a desired pose of steerable segment 116. For example, control logic 140 can determine desired position coordinates, e.g., X′, Y′, and Z′, of the end of steerable segment 116 and desired orientation angles, e.g., angles θ′X, θ′Y, and θ′Z of the center axis of steerable segment 116 relative to coordinate axes X, Y, and Z. The holding modes described above generally provide fewer than six constraints on the desired coordinates. For example, position stiffness operates to constrain three degrees of freedom, the position of the end of steerable segment 116 but not the orientation angles. In contrast, orientation stiffness mode constrains one or more orientation angles but not the position of end of steerable segment 116. Target position stiffness mode constrains four degrees of freedom, and axial stiffness mode constrains five degrees of freedom. Control logic 610 can impose further constraints to select one of set of parameters, e.g., X′, Y′, and Z′ and angles θ′X, θ′Y, and θ′Z, that provides the desired working configuration. Such further constraints include but are not limited to mechanical constraints required by the capabilities of steerable segment 116 and of catheter 110 generally and utilitarian constraints such as minimizing movement of steerable segment 116 or providing desired operating characteristics such as smooth, non-oscillating, and predictable movement with controlled stress in catheter 110. Step 620 possibly includes just keeping a set pose steerable segment 116 by finding smallest movement from the measured pose to a pose satisfying the constraints, e.g., finding the point on the target line closest to the measure position for axial motion stiffness or finding some suitable pose from registered pre-op data that is close to the current pose.


Control logic 140 in step 630 uses the desired and/or measured poses to determine corrected control signals that will cause drive interface 120 to move steerable segment 116 to the desired pose. For example, the mechanics of catheter 110 and drive interface 120 may permit development of mappings from the desired coordinates X′, Y′, and Z′ and angles θ′X, θ′Y, and θ′Z to actuator control signals that provide the desired pose. Other embodiments may use differences between the measured and desired pose to determine corrected control signals. In general, the control signals may be used not only to control actuators connected through tendons to steerable segment 116 but may also control (to some degree) insertion or roll of catheter 110 as a whole.


A branch step 650 completes a feedback loop by causing process 600 to return to measurement step 610 after control system 140 applies new control signals drive interface 120. The pose of distal tip is thus actively monitored and controlled according to fixed constraints as long as control system 120 remains in the holding mode. It may be noted, however, that some degrees of freedom of steerable segment 116 may not require active control. For example, in orientation stiffness mode, feedback control could actively maintain pitch and yaw of steerable segment 116, while the mechanical torsional stiffness of catheter 110 is relied on hold the roll angle fixed. However, catheter 110 in general may be subject to unpredictable external forces or patient movement that would otherwise cause catheter 110 to move relative to the work site, and active control as in process 600 is needed to maintain or hold the desired working configuration.


Some embodiments or elements of the above invention can be implemented in a computer-readable media, e.g., a non-transient media, such as an optical or magnetic disk, a memory card, or other solid state storage containing instructions that a computing device can execute to perform specific processes that are described herein. Such media may further be or be contained in a server or other device connected to a network such as the Internet that provides for the downloading of data and executable instructions.


Although the invention has been described with reference to particular embodiments, the description is only an example of the invention's application and should not be taken as a limitation. Various adaptations and combinations of features of the embodiments disclosed are within the scope of the invention as defined by the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A robotic system, comprising: an instrument, comprising: a proximal section,a distal section, the distal section comprising a steerable segment and a distal tip,a main lumen extending through the instrument, andat least one pull wire;at least one sensor configured to detect a position of the distal tip of the instrument;computer readable media having stored thereon executable instructions;a computing device in communication with the computer readable media and configured to execute the instructions to cause the system to at least: record a position of a working configuration of the distal tip of the instrument;determine, based on a sensor signal from the at least one sensor, a movement of the distal tip of the instrument in response to insertion of a probe into the main lumen of the instrument; andgenerate at least one control signal based on the determined movement; anda drive interface connected to the at least one pull wire at the proximal section of the instrument, the drive interface configured to adjust a tensioning of the at least one pull wire based on the at least one control signal, wherein the adjusted tensioning facilitates returning the distal tip of the instrument to the position of the working configuration recorded before the movement occurred.
  • 2. The robotic system of claim 1, wherein the drive interface is connected to a robotic manipulator assembly, the robotic manipulator assembly and the drive interface configured to navigate the distal section of the instrument through a body lumen to target tissue.
  • 3. The robotic system of claim 1, further comprising an electromagnetic field generator, wherein: the at least one sensor comprises a set of one or more electromagnetic sensors in the distal section of the instrument; andthe computing device is configured to execute the instructions to cause the system to: determine a first position of the set of the one or more electromagnetic sensors based on information from the set of the one or more electromagnetic sensors; anddetermine the movement of the distal tip of the instrument based on the determined first position.
  • 4. The robotic system of claim 1, wherein: the at least one sensor comprises one or more acceleration sensors; andthe computing device is configured to execute the instructions to cause the system to: determine a first position of the one or more acceleration sensors based on information from the one or more acceleration sensors; anddetermine the movement of the distal tip of the instrument based on the determined first position.
  • 5. The robotic system of claim 1, wherein the instructions comprise commands for the drive interface to selectively pull the at least one pull wire to return the distal tip of the instrument to the position of the working configuration.
  • 6. The robotic system of claim 1, further comprising: an operator interface configured to generate control signals for the drive interface.
  • 7. The robotic system of claim 1, wherein the computing device is configured to execute the instructions to cause the system to identify the probe.
  • 8. The robotic system of claim 1, wherein the probe comprises a biopsy probe.
  • 9. A method of controlling at least one pull wire of an instrument, the method comprising: recording a working configuration of the instrument using a computing device, the instrument comprising: a proximal section,a distal section, the distal section comprising a steerable segment and a distal tip,a main lumen extending through the instrument, andthe at least one pull wire;inserting a probe into the main lumen of the instrument;determining, based on a sensor signal from at least one sensor, a movement of the distal tip of the instrument away from the recorded working configuration in response to the insertion of the probe;generating at least one control signal based on the determined movement of the distal tip of the instrument; andadjusting a tensioning of the at least one pull wire based on the at least one control signal, wherein the adjusted tensioning facilitates returning the distal tip of the instrument to the recorded working configuration.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, wherein: the at least one sensor comprises a set of one or more electromagnetic sensors in the distal section of the instrument; andthe determining of the movement of the distal tip of the instrument is based on receiving sensor information from the set of one or more electromagnetic sensors.
  • 11. The method of claim 9, wherein: the at least one sensor comprises one or more acceleration sensors; andthe determining of the movement of the distal tip of the instrument is based on receiving sensor information from the one or more acceleration sensors.
  • 12. The method of claim 9, wherein adjusting the tensioning of the at least one pull wire includes selectively pulling the at least one pull wire to return the distal tip of the instrument to the recorded working configuration.
  • 13. The method of claim 9, further comprising: receiving control signals from an operator interface configured to generate control signals to move the instrument into the recorded working configuration.
  • 14. The method of claim 9, further comprising: identifying the probe.
  • 15. A non-transient computer readable storage medium having stored thereon instructions that, when executed, cause at least one computing device to at least, for an instrument comprising at least one pull wire: pose a distal tip of the instrument in a working configuration;determine a position of the working configuration of the distal tip of the instrument;determine, based on a sensor signal from at least one sensor, a movement of the distal tip of the instrument in response to insertion of a probe into a main lumen of the instrument;generate at least one control signal based on the determined movement; andadjust a tensioning of the at least one pull wire based on the at least one control signal, wherein the adjusted tensioning facilitates returning the distal tip of the instrument to the position of the working configuration.
  • 16. The non-transient computer readable storage medium of claim 15, wherein: the at least one sensor comprises a set of one or more electromagnetic sensors in a distal section of the instrument; andthe instructions that cause the at least one computing device to determine the movement of the distal tip of the instrument cause the at least one computing device to determine the movement of the distal tip of the instrument based on sensor information from the set of one or more electromagnetic sensors.
  • 17. The non-transient computer readable storage medium of claim 15, wherein: the at least one sensor comprises one or more acceleration sensors; andthe instructions that cause the at least one computing device to determine the movement of the distal tip of the instrument cause the at least one computing device to determine the movement of the distal tip of the instrument based on sensor information from the one or more acceleration sensors.
  • 18. The non-transient computer readable storage medium of claim 15, wherein the instructions that cause the at least one computing device to adjust the tensioning of the at least one pull wire include instructions that cause the at least one computing device to selectively pull the at least one pull wire to return the distal tip of the instrument to the position of the working configuration.
  • 19. The non-transient computer readable storage medium of claim 15, wherein the instructions further cause the at least one computing device to: receive control signals from an operator interface configured to generate control signals to pose the distal tip of the instrument in the working configuration.
  • 20. The non-transient computer readable storage medium of claim 15, wherein the instructions further cause the at least one computing device to: identify the probe.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This patent application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/257,387 filed Sep. 6, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/274,208 filed Oct. 14, 2011, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. This patent document is related to and incorporates by reference the following co-filed patent applications: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/274,198, filed Oct. 14, 2011 entitled “Catheters with Control Modes for Interchangeable Probes”; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/274,229, filed Oct. 14, 2011 entitled “Vision Probe and Catheter Systems”; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/274,237, filed Oct. 14, 2011 entitled “Catheter Sensor Systems.”

US Referenced Citations (526)
Number Name Date Kind
3096962 Meijs Jul 1963 A
3546961 Marton Dec 1970 A
4437114 Larussa Mar 1984 A
4644237 Frushour et al. Feb 1987 A
4748969 Wardle Jun 1988 A
4792715 Barsky et al. Dec 1988 A
4809191 Domeier et al. Feb 1989 A
4905082 Nishigaki et al. Feb 1990 A
4949927 Madocks et al. Aug 1990 A
5114403 Clarke et al. May 1992 A
5174276 Crockard Dec 1992 A
5201757 Heyn et al. Apr 1993 A
5251611 Zehel et al. Oct 1993 A
5280781 Oku Jan 1994 A
5285796 Hughes Feb 1994 A
5297536 Wilk Mar 1994 A
5307437 Facq et al. Apr 1994 A
5351693 Taimisto et al. Oct 1994 A
5408263 Kikuchi et al. Apr 1995 A
5417210 Funda et al. May 1995 A
5429604 Hammersmark et al. Jul 1995 A
5487757 Truckai et al. Jan 1996 A
5588949 Taylor et al. Dec 1996 A
5613946 McKeever Mar 1997 A
5617515 MacLaren et al. Apr 1997 A
5624380 Takayama et al. Apr 1997 A
5631973 Green May 1997 A
5643175 Adair Jul 1997 A
5672877 Liebig et al. Sep 1997 A
5729129 Acker Mar 1998 A
5752112 Paddock et al. May 1998 A
5755713 Bilof et al. May 1998 A
5759151 Sturges Jun 1998 A
5792135 Madhani et al. Aug 1998 A
5797900 Madhani et al. Aug 1998 A
5817084 Jensen et al. Oct 1998 A
5855569 Komi et al. Jan 1999 A
5868760 McGuckin, Jr. Feb 1999 A
5876325 Mizuno et al. Mar 1999 A
5892860 Maron et al. Apr 1999 A
5899425 Corey, Jr. et al. May 1999 A
5899851 Koninckx May 1999 A
5976071 Sekiya Nov 1999 A
5982791 Sorin et al. Nov 1999 A
6004016 Spector Dec 1999 A
6013024 Mitsuda et al. Jan 2000 A
6030130 Paddock et al. Feb 2000 A
6066090 Yoon May 2000 A
6120433 Mizuno et al. Sep 2000 A
6132368 Cooper Oct 2000 A
6161032 Acker Dec 2000 A
6171277 Ponzi Jan 2001 B1
6188355 Gilboa Feb 2001 B1
6191414 Ogle et al. Feb 2001 B1
6198974 Webster, Jr. Mar 2001 B1
6200274 McNeirney Mar 2001 B1
6203493 Ben-Haim Mar 2001 B1
6246200 Blumenkranz et al. Jun 2001 B1
6253770 Acker et al. Jul 2001 B1
6275628 Jones et al. Aug 2001 B1
6331181 Tierney et al. Dec 2001 B1
6332089 Acker et al. Dec 2001 B1
6335617 Osadchy et al. Jan 2002 B1
6347892 Paddock et al. Feb 2002 B1
6352503 Matsui et al. Mar 2002 B1
6366722 Murphy et al. Apr 2002 B1
6366799 Acker et al. Apr 2002 B1
6371952 Madhani et al. Apr 2002 B1
6380732 Gilboa Apr 2002 B1
6389187 Greenaway et al. May 2002 B1
6396574 Lee et al. May 2002 B1
6432041 Taniguchi et al. Aug 2002 B1
6441577 Blumenkranz et al. Aug 2002 B2
6451027 Cooper et al. Sep 2002 B1
6453190 Acker et al. Sep 2002 B1
6459926 Nowlin et al. Oct 2002 B1
6470205 Bosselmann et al. Oct 2002 B2
6471710 Bucholtz Oct 2002 B1
6478028 Paolitto et al. Nov 2002 B1
6484118 Govari Nov 2002 B1
6487352 Sobiski et al. Nov 2002 B1
6490467 Bucholz et al. Dec 2002 B1
6554793 Pauker et al. Apr 2003 B1
6571639 May et al. Jun 2003 B1
6572629 Kalloo et al. Jun 2003 B2
6574355 Green Jun 2003 B2
6575644 Paddock et al. Jun 2003 B2
6578967 Paddock et al. Jun 2003 B1
6618612 Acker et al. Sep 2003 B1
6645196 Nixon et al. Nov 2003 B1
6648816 Irion et al. Nov 2003 B2
6671055 Wavering et al. Dec 2003 B1
6671581 Niemeyer et al. Dec 2003 B2
6695871 Maki et al. Feb 2004 B1
6720988 Gere et al. Apr 2004 B1
6743239 Kuehn et al. Jun 2004 B1
6758843 Jensen et al. Jul 2004 B2
6783491 Saadat et al. Aug 2004 B2
6790173 Saadat et al. Sep 2004 B2
6817974 Cooper et al. Nov 2004 B2
6833814 Gilboa et al. Dec 2004 B2
6837846 Jaffe et al. Jan 2005 B2
6837847 Ewers et al. Jan 2005 B2
6866671 Tierney et al. Mar 2005 B2
6899672 Chin et al. May 2005 B2
6902560 Morley et al. Jun 2005 B1
6936042 Wallace et al. Aug 2005 B2
6942613 Ewers et al. Sep 2005 B2
6960162 Saadat et al. Nov 2005 B2
6960163 Ewers et al. Nov 2005 B2
6984203 Tartaglia et al. Jan 2006 B2
6991602 Nakazawa et al. Jan 2006 B2
6994703 Wang et al. Feb 2006 B2
6997870 Couvillon, Jr. Feb 2006 B2
7007699 Martinelli et al. Mar 2006 B2
7041052 Saadat et al. May 2006 B2
7042573 Froggatt May 2006 B2
7090637 Danitz et al. Aug 2006 B2
7090683 Brock et al. Aug 2006 B2
7128708 Saadat et al. Oct 2006 B2
7139601 Bucholz et al. Nov 2006 B2
7197354 Sobe Mar 2007 B2
7233820 Gilboa Jun 2007 B2
7252660 Kunz Aug 2007 B2
7277120 Gere et al. Oct 2007 B2
7320700 Cooper et al. Jan 2008 B2
7371028 Gordon et al. May 2008 B2
7398116 Edwards Jul 2008 B2
7500947 Kucklick et al. Mar 2009 B2
7594912 Cooper et al. Sep 2009 B2
7607440 Coste-Maniere et al. Oct 2009 B2
7715105 Forkey et al. May 2010 B2
7720322 Prisco et al. May 2010 B2
7725214 Diolaiti May 2010 B2
7772541 Froggatt et al. Aug 2010 B2
7853307 Edwards Dec 2010 B2
7920909 Lyon et al. Apr 2011 B2
7922650 McWeeney et al. Apr 2011 B2
7930065 Larkin et al. Apr 2011 B2
7947000 Vargas et al. May 2011 B2
7962193 Edwards et al. Jun 2011 B2
8016749 Clerc et al. Sep 2011 B2
8335557 Maschke Dec 2012 B2
8376934 Takahashi et al. Feb 2013 B2
8396595 Dariush Mar 2013 B2
8442618 Strommer et al. May 2013 B2
8506555 Ruiz Morales Aug 2013 B2
8554368 Fielding et al. Oct 2013 B2
8720448 Reis May 2014 B2
8738181 Greer et al. May 2014 B2
8784303 Laby et al. Jul 2014 B2
8784435 Cooper et al. Jul 2014 B2
8827948 Romo et al. Sep 2014 B2
8858424 Hasegawa et al. Oct 2014 B2
8929631 Pfister et al. Jan 2015 B2
8945095 Blumenkranz et al. Feb 2015 B2
9014851 Wong et al. Apr 2015 B2
9060678 Larkin et al. Jun 2015 B2
9125639 Mathis et al. Sep 2015 B2
9129417 Zheng et al. Sep 2015 B2
9199372 Henderson et al. Dec 2015 B2
9226796 Bowling et al. Jan 2016 B2
9256940 Carelsen et al. Feb 2016 B2
9289578 Walker et al. Mar 2016 B2
9314306 Yu Apr 2016 B2
9345456 Tsonton et al. May 2016 B2
9358682 Ruiz Morales Jun 2016 B2
9387048 Donhowe et al. Jul 2016 B2
9452276 Duindam et al. Sep 2016 B2
9504604 Alvarez Nov 2016 B2
9522034 Johnson et al. Dec 2016 B2
9561083 Yu et al. Feb 2017 B2
9622827 Yu et al. Apr 2017 B2
9629595 Walker et al. Apr 2017 B2
9636184 Lee et al. May 2017 B2
9675422 Hourtash et al. Jun 2017 B2
9713509 Schuh et al. Jul 2017 B2
9727963 Mintz et al. Aug 2017 B2
9737371 Romo et al. Aug 2017 B2
9737373 Schuh Aug 2017 B2
9744335 Jiang Aug 2017 B2
9763741 Alvarez et al. Sep 2017 B2
9788910 Schuh Oct 2017 B2
9789608 Itkowitz et al. Oct 2017 B2
9818681 Machida Nov 2017 B2
9844353 Walker et al. Dec 2017 B2
9844412 Bogusky et al. Dec 2017 B2
9867635 Alvarez et al. Jan 2018 B2
9931025 Graetzel et al. Apr 2018 B1
9949749 Noonan et al. Apr 2018 B2
9955986 Shah May 2018 B2
9962228 Schuh et al. May 2018 B2
9980785 Schuh May 2018 B2
9993313 Schuh et al. Jun 2018 B2
10016900 Meyer et al. Jul 2018 B1
10022192 Ummalaneni Jul 2018 B1
10080576 Romo et al. Sep 2018 B2
10238837 Duindam et al. Mar 2019 B2
10299870 Connolly et al. May 2019 B2
10568700 Donhowe et al. Feb 2020 B2
10653866 Duindam et al. May 2020 B2
10682070 Duindam Jun 2020 B2
10744303 Duindam et al. Aug 2020 B2
20010049509 Sekine et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020077550 Rabiner et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020087169 Brock et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020120252 Brock et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020143319 Brock Oct 2002 A1
20020151967 Mikus et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020156345 Eppler et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020161280 Chatenever et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020173786 Kortenbach et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030045778 Ohline et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030050649 Brock et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030182091 Kukuk Sep 2003 A1
20030236455 Swanson et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030236505 Bonadio et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040024311 Quaid et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040054355 Gerbi et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040083808 Rambow et al. May 2004 A1
20040116803 Jascob et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040138525 Saadat et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040138529 Wiltshire et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040147837 MacAulay et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040153191 Grimm et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040202400 Kochergin et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040249367 Saadat et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040257021 Chang et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050004431 Kogasaka et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050043718 Madhani et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050049486 Urquhart et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050059960 Simaan et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050065397 Saadat et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050065398 Adams Mar 2005 A1
20050065400 Banik et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050096502 Khalili May 2005 A1
20050102062 Green May 2005 A1
20050131343 Abrams et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050192532 Kucklick et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050197536 Banik et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050197557 Strommer et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050215983 Brock Sep 2005 A1
20050222554 Wallace et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050251176 Swanstrom et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050256398 Hastings et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050261551 Couvillon, Jr. Nov 2005 A1
20050272977 Saadat et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050284221 Danisch et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060004286 Chang et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060013523 Childlers et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060015096 Hauck et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060025652 Vargas Feb 2006 A1
20060041293 Mehdizadeh et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060095022 Moll May 2006 A1
20060149418 Anvari Jul 2006 A1
20060161045 Merril et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060161136 Anderson et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060184016 Glossop et al. Aug 2006 A1
20070013336 Nowlin et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070016070 Grunwald et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070021738 Hasser et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070043455 Viswanathan et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070049908 Boese et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070055128 Glossop et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070055291 Birkmeyer et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070065077 Childers et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070083217 Eversull et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070089557 Solomon et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070106116 Sugimoto May 2007 A1
20070135803 Belson Jun 2007 A1
20070135886 Maschke Jun 2007 A1
20070137371 Devengenzo et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070150155 Kawai et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070151391 Larkin et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070156020 Foley et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070173694 Tsuji et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070197896 Moll et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070225554 Maseda et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070249911 Simon Oct 2007 A1
20070253599 White et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070265503 Schlesinger et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070270642 Bayer et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070283970 Mohr et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070287884 Schena Dec 2007 A1
20070287889 Mohr Dec 2007 A1
20070287992 Diolaiti et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070299353 Harlev et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080046122 Manzo et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080058861 Cooper et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080064921 Larkin et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080064927 Larkin et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080064931 Schena et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080065097 Duval et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080065098 Larkin et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080065099 Cooper et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080065100 Larkin Mar 2008 A1
20080065101 Larkin Mar 2008 A1
20080065102 Cooper Mar 2008 A1
20080065103 Cooper et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080065104 Larkin et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080065106 Larkin Mar 2008 A1
20080065107 Larkin et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080065109 Larkin et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080065110 Duval et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080071288 Larkin et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080071289 Cooper et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080071290 Larkin et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080071291 Duval et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080097155 Gattani et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080103362 Couvillon, Jr. May 2008 A1
20080108870 Wiita et al. May 2008 A1
20080123921 Gielen et al. May 2008 A1
20080140087 Barbagli Jun 2008 A1
20080147089 Loh et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080151041 Shafer et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080156971 Ogisu et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080159653 Dunki-Jacobs et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080172049 Bredno et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080231221 Ogawa Sep 2008 A1
20080249640 Vittor et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080255505 Carlson et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080287963 Rogers et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080312771 Sugiura Dec 2008 A1
20090030307 Govari et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090076534 Shelton, IV et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090085807 Anderson Apr 2009 A1
20090088756 Anderson Apr 2009 A1
20090088774 Swarup et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090096443 Anderson Apr 2009 A1
20090105799 Hekmat et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090118620 Tgavalekos et al. May 2009 A1
20090123111 Udd May 2009 A1
20090137952 Ramamurthy et al. May 2009 A1
20090184825 Anderson Jul 2009 A1
20090198298 Kaiser et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090231419 Bayer Sep 2009 A1
20090245600 Hoffman et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090248040 Cooper et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090281566 Edwards et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090287354 Choi Nov 2009 A1
20090314131 Bailey Dec 2009 A1
20090322001 Luke et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090326322 Diolaiti et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090326552 Diolaiti Dec 2009 A1
20090326553 Mustufa et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100030115 Fujimoto et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100041949 Tolkowsky Feb 2010 A1
20100076263 Tanaka et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100076303 McKinley Mar 2010 A1
20100082041 Prisco Apr 2010 A1
20100121138 Goldenberg et al. May 2010 A1
20100121139 Ouyang et al. May 2010 A1
20100125284 Tanner et al. May 2010 A1
20100210939 Hartmann et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100222647 Hashimshony et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100234856 Stoianovici et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100256812 Tsusaka et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100274087 Diolaiti et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100292535 Paskar Nov 2010 A1
20100331820 Prisco et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100332033 Diolaiti et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110021903 Strommer et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110028991 Ikeda et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110040305 Gomez et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110040404 Diolaiti et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110054309 Edwards Mar 2011 A1
20110082365 McGrogan et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110082462 Suarez et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110092808 Shachar et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110125032 McIntyre et al. May 2011 A1
20110130750 Ormsby et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110137122 Kawai Jun 2011 A1
20110152879 Williams et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110153252 Govari et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110160570 Kariv et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110172680 Younge et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110172687 Woodruff et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110184241 Zubiate et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110184276 Lyon et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110196199 Donhowe et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110196419 Cooper Aug 2011 A1
20110201883 Cooper et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110201922 Hezemans et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110202068 Diolaiti et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110224684 Larkin et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110224685 Larkin et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110224686 Larkin et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110224687 Larkin et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110224688 Larkin et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110224689 Larkin et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110224825 Larkin et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110237889 Tanaka Sep 2011 A1
20110277576 Cooper Nov 2011 A1
20110277579 Anderson et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110277580 Cooper et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110277775 Holop et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110277776 McGrogan et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110282356 Solomon et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110282357 Rogers et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110282358 Gomez et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110282359 Duval Nov 2011 A1
20110282491 Prisco et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110319910 Roelle et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120000427 Nilsson Jan 2012 A1
20120010628 Cooper et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120046522 Naito Feb 2012 A1
20120059249 Verard et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120071752 Sewell et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120116393 Jimenez et al. May 2012 A1
20120123441 Au et al. May 2012 A1
20120150075 Ludwin et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120165608 Banik et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120182409 Moriyama et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120209293 Carlson et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120215094 Rahimian et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120253276 Govari et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120289815 Keast et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120328077 Bouvier Dec 2012 A1
20130085330 Ramamurthy et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130090530 Ramamurthy et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130096385 Fenech et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130102846 Sjostrom et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130131503 Schneider et al. May 2013 A1
20130144124 Prisco et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130165854 Sandhu et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130165945 Roelle et al. Jun 2013 A9
20130169272 Eichler et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130172906 Olson et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130218005 Desai et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130223702 Holsing et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130303944 Duindam Nov 2013 A1
20130325030 Hourtash et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140114180 Jain Apr 2014 A1
20140135985 Coste-Maniere et al. May 2014 A1
20140142591 Alvarez et al. May 2014 A1
20140163664 Goldsmith Jun 2014 A1
20140296870 Stern et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140296872 Cooper et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140309649 Alvarez et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140316420 Ballard et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140357984 Wallace et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140364870 Alvarez et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150051592 Kintz Feb 2015 A1
20150088161 Hata et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150101442 Romo Apr 2015 A1
20150104284 Riedel Apr 2015 A1
20150119628 Bharat et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150119638 Yu et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150164594 Romo et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150164596 Romo et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150202015 Elhawary et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150223902 Walker et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150265359 Camarillo Sep 2015 A1
20150265807 Park et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150297864 Kokish et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150335480 Alvarez et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150342695 He et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150359597 Gombert et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150374956 Bogusky Dec 2015 A1
20160001038 Romo et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160005168 Merlet Jan 2016 A1
20160005220 Weingarten et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160005576 Tsukamoto Jan 2016 A1
20160007880 Duindam Jan 2016 A1
20160016319 Remirez et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160029998 Brister et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160045269 Elhawary et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160051221 Dickhans et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160066794 Klinder et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160073928 Soper et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160081568 Kolberg et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160100772 Ikuma et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160228032 Walker et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160270865 Landey et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160278865 Capote et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160287111 Jacobsen Oct 2016 A1
20160287279 Bovay et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160296294 Moll et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160331469 Hall et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160338787 Popovic et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160346924 Hasegawa et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160354057 Hansen et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160360947 Iida et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160360949 Hyodo et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160374541 Agrawal et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170007337 Dan Jan 2017 A1
20170056215 Nagesh et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170068796 Passerini et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170100199 Yu et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170119413 Romo May 2017 A1
20170119481 Romo et al. May 2017 A1
20170151027 Walker et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170165011 Bovay et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170165503 Hautvast et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170172673 Yu et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170202627 Sramek et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170209073 Sramek et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170251988 Weber et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170280978 Yamamoto et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170281049 Yamamoto et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170290631 Lee et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170304015 Tavallaei et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170325715 Mehendale et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170333679 Jiang Nov 2017 A1
20170340396 Romo et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170365055 Mintz et al. Dec 2017 A1
20170367782 Schuh et al. Dec 2017 A1
20180025666 Ho et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180177383 Noonan et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180177556 Noonan Jun 2018 A1
20180177561 Mintz et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180214011 Graetzel et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180221038 Noonan et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180221039 Shah Aug 2018 A1
20180250083 Schuh et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180250085 Simi et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180271616 Schuh et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180279852 Rafii-Tari et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180280660 Landey et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180289243 Landey et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180289431 Draper et al. Oct 2018 A1
20190192819 Duindam et al. Jun 2019 A1
20200023201 Overweg Jan 2020 A1
20200146757 Fenech et al. May 2020 A1
20200275860 Duindam Sep 2020 A1
20210016061 Duindam et al. Jan 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (49)
Number Date Country
101088451 Dec 2007 CN
101247847 Aug 2008 CN
101404921 Apr 2009 CN
101918073 Dec 2010 CN
102013100605 Jul 2014 DE
1566150 Aug 2005 EP
1800593 Jun 2007 EP
2158834 Mar 2010 EP
2392435 Dec 2011 EP
3025630 Jun 2016 EP
S57190549 Nov 1982 JP
H06285009 Oct 1994 JP
H07504363 May 1995 JP
H07505790 Jun 1995 JP
H1020214 Jan 1998 JP
2000093522 Apr 2000 JP
2000166936 Jun 2000 JP
2001046529 Feb 2001 JP
2003275223 Sep 2003 JP
2008018007 Jan 2008 JP
2008508987 Mar 2008 JP
2009530069 Aug 2009 JP
19990087101 Dec 1999 KR
WO-9313916 Jul 1993 WO
WO-9605768 Feb 1996 WO
WO-9729690 Aug 1997 WO
WO-9744089 Nov 1997 WO
WO-0051486 Sep 2000 WO
WO-0156457 Aug 2001 WO
WO-0207809 Jan 2002 WO
WO-2004016155 Feb 2004 WO
WO-2005087128 Sep 2005 WO
WO-2006039092 Apr 2006 WO
WO-2006122061 Nov 2006 WO
WO-2007109418 Sep 2007 WO
WO-2007109778 Sep 2007 WO
WO-2007146987 Dec 2007 WO
WO-2008028149 Mar 2008 WO
WO-2008111070 Sep 2008 WO
WO-2008147961 Dec 2008 WO
WO-2009002701 Dec 2008 WO
WO-2009120940 Oct 2009 WO
WO-2009148317 Dec 2009 WO
WO-2010039394 Apr 2010 WO
WO-2011001300 Jan 2011 WO
WO-2011085166 Jul 2011 WO
WO-2011100110 Aug 2011 WO
WO-2011132409 Oct 2011 WO
WO-2017048194 Mar 2017 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (229)
Entry
Exhibit I, Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s vs Defendant Auris Health, Inc, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Claim Construction, Case No. 18-1359 (MN), Nov. 20, 2019, 59 pages.
Exhibit J, Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review 35 U.S.C. § 314, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, IPR2019-01496 U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276 B2, Before Ulrike W. Jenks, Tina E. Hulse, and James A. Worth, Administrative Patent Judges, Feb. 13, 2020, 21 pages.
Exhibit K, Declaration of William Cimino Regarding U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, Sep. 27, 2016, in the United States Patent and Trademark, inventors: Vincent Duindam et al., 126 pages.
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, Filed: Oct. 14, 2011, 113 pages.
Patent Owner's Mandatory Notices of U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner: Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, IPR2019-01496, Sep. 3, 2019, 6 pages.
Petitioner's Updated Exhibit List of U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, review No. IPR2019-01496 dated Oct. 15, 2019, 04 pages.
Exhibit 1, Before Ulrike W. Jenks, Tina E. Hulse, and James A. Worth, Administrative Patent Judges, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc v. Patent Owner: Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., IPR2019-01173, Document 215-1, Entered: Dec. 16, 2019, 197 pages.
Exhibit 1, Redacted in its Entirety, Demand for Jury Trial, Defendant Auris Health,Inc.'s First set of Requests for production to Plaintiffs, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Document 233-1, 2019, 1-70 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2018/039604 dated Sep. 14, 2018, 6 pages.
Kukuk M., et al., “TBNA-protocols: Guiding TransBronchial Needle Aspirations Without a Computer in the Operating Room”, International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), Oct. 5, 2001, LNCS 2208, pp. 997-1006.
Petitioner's Request for Rehearing of the Institution Decision of U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, Review No. IPR2019-01496 dated Mar. 16, 2020, 9 pages.
Shaw Keller LLP, Responsive Letter to Honorable Maryellen Noreika from David M. Fry, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. vs Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Redacted—Public Version, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Document 236, Apr. 1, 2020, 1-117 pages.
Shaw Keller LLP, Letter, The Honorable Maryellen Noreika from David M. Fry, Case No. 18-1359(MN), Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Defendant: Auris Health, Inc., held on Mar. 31, 2020, pp. 1-77.
Stipulation Regarding U.S. Pat. No. 8,142,447, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Mar. 20, 2020, 2 pages.
Verdaasdonk R., et al., “Effect of Microsecond Pulse Length and Tip Shape on Explosive Bubble Formation of 2.78 μm Er,Cr;YSGG and 2.94 μm Er:YAG Laser”, Proceedings of SPIE, Jan. 23, 2012, vol. 8221 (12), 1 page.
[Proposed] Amended Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 61, 2019, 14 pages.
[proposed] Order Regarding Access to Source Code, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 46, Mar. 21, 2019, 3 pages.
[Proposed] Stipulated Protective Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 45, Mar. 21, 2019, 31 pages.
Abbott, Daniel J. et al. “Design of an Endoluminal NOTES Robotic System,” Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2007, pp. 410-416.
Al-Ahmad A., et al., “Early Experience with a Computerized Obotically Controlled Catheter System,” Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, Apr. 2005, vol. 12(3), pp. 199-202.
Amended Joint Claim Construction Chart, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 123-1, Nov. 13, 2019, 31 pages.
Amended Joint Claim Construction Chart, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 81, Aug. 29, 2019, 29 pages.
Amending Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 62, 2019, 14 pages.
Anisfield, Nancy: “Ascension Technology Puts Spotlight on DC Field Magnetic Motion Tracking,” HP Chronicle, Aug. 2000, vol. 17, No. 9, 3 Pages.
Ascari, Luca et al., “A New Active Microendoscope for Exploring the Sub-Arachnoid Space in the Spinal Cord,” Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2003, pp. 2657-2662, vol. 2, IEEE.
Auris Health, Inc.'s Opposition to Motion for Reargument Regarding Mar. 11, 2019 Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Jury Trial Demanded, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 52, Mar. 29, 2019, 8 pages.
Barnes Industries, Inc., “How a Ball Screw Works,” 4 pages, Copyright 2007; Internet: http://www.barnesballscrew.com/ball.htm.
Berthold III, John W., “Historical Review of Microbend Fiber-Optic Sensors,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 13, No. 7, Jul. 1995, pp. 1193-1199.
Blue Road Research, “Overview of Fiber Optic Sensors,” 40 pages, first posted Dec. 8, 2004. Internet< www.bluerr.com/papers/Overview_of_FOS2.pdf>.
Cao, Caroline G.L., “Designing Spatial Orientation in Endoscopic Environments,” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting, 2001, pp. 1259-1263.
Cao, Caroline G.L., “Disorientation in Minimal Access Surgery: A Case Study,” Proceedings of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress, pp. 4-169-4-172.
Childers, Brooks A., et al., “Use of 3000 Bragg grating strain sensors distributed on four eight-meter optical fibers during static load tests of a composite structure,” SPIE 8th International Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials, Mar. 4-8, 2001, Newport Beach, California, 10 Pages.
Choi, Dong-Geol et al., “Design of a Spring Backbone Micro Endoscope,” Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2007, pp. 1815-1821.
Compendium of Inventor Declarations in Support of Plaintiffs Intutive Surgical, Inc. and Intutive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Document 29, Dec. 11, 2018, 2 pages.
Complaint for Patent Infringement, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand for Jury Trial, Aug. 31, 2018, 14 pages.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/762,185, filed Jun. 13, 2007.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,028, filed Jun. 13, 2006.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,029, filed Jun. 13, 2006.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,030, filed Jun. 13, 2006.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,075, filed Jun. 13, 2006.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,125, filed Jun. 13, 2006.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,126, filed Jun. 13, 2006.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,129, filed Jun. 13, 2006.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,131, filed Jun. 13, 2006.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,172, filed Jun. 13, 2006.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,198, filed Jun. 13, 2006.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,207, filed Jun. 13, 2006.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,328, filed Jun. 13, 2006.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 61/334,978, filed May 14, 2010.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,173, filed Jun. 13, 2006.
Cowie, Barbara M., et al., “Distributive Tactile Sensing Using Fibre Bragg Grating Sensors for Biomedical Applications,” 1st IEEE / RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob 2006), Feb. 2006, pp. 312-317.
Curriculum Vitae of Prof. Ron Alterovitz, Ph.D, Professor, Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Jan. 14, 2019, 22 pages.
Danisch, Lee et al., “Spatially continuous six degree of freedom position and orientation sensor,” Sensor Review, 1999, vol. 19, Issue 2, pp. 106-112.
Dario, Paolo et al., “A Miniature Device for Medical Intracavitary Intervention,” Micro Electro Mechanical Systems '91 Proc IEEE ‘An Investigation of Micro Structures, Sensors, Actuators, Machines and Robots’, 1991, pp. 171-175, IEEE.
Declaration of David Styka in Support of Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Opening Brief in Support of Its Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(A), United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-LPS, Jury Trial Demanded. Document 18, 2018, 3 pages.
Declaration of Kelly E. Farnan in Support of Auris Health, Inc.'s Opposition to Motion for Reargument Regarding Mar. 11, 2019 Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 53, 2019, 3 pages.
Declaration of Laura E. Miller in Support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Stay, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Exihibit, Document 122, Nov. 13, 2019, 50 pages.
Declaration of Laura Miller in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Reargument Regarding Mar. 11, 2019 Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 44, 2019, 1 page.
Declaration of Nathan B. Sabri in Support of Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Opening Brief in Support of Its Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(A), United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-LPS, Jury Trial Demanded, Document 16, 2018, 7 pages.
Declaration of Shaelyn K. Dawson in Support of Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Stay Case Pending Inter Partes Review, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 119, 2019, 3 pages.
Declaration of Shaelyn K. Dawson in Support of Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Reply in Support of Its Motion to Stay Case Pending Inter Partes Review, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 127, 2019, 2 pages.
Declaration of Taylor Patton in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Redacted—Public Version, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Document 30, Dec. 11, 2018, 15 pages.
Declaration of Vera Ranieri in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359 MN, Document 28, Demand for Jury Trial, 2018, 4 pages.
Declaration of Prof. Ron Alterovitz, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, 2019, 25 pages.
Declaration of Professor Mark E. Rentschler, Ph.D, Mar. 2018, 58 pages.
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Amended Notice of Deposition of Catherine J. Mohr, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Demand for Jury Trial, Document 99, Oct. 9, 2019, 2 pages.
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Amended Notice of Deposition of Vincent Duindam, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 100, Demand for Jury Trial, Oct. 9, 2019, 2 pages.
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Answer to Plaintiffs' Complaint for Patent Infringement, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-LPS, Jury Trial Demanded, Document 12, Oct. 25, 2018, 12 pages.
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Notice of 30(B)(6) Deposition of Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 120, Nov. 12, 2019, 10 pages.
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Notice of Deposition of Catherine J. Mohr, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 94. Oct. 2, 2019, 2 pages.
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Notice of Deposition of Mark E. Rentschler, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Demand for Jury Trial, Document 103, Oct. 15, 2019, 2 pages.
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'S Notice of Deposition of Tim Soper, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand for Jury Trial, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 87, Sep. 13, 2019, 2 pages.
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Notice of Deposition of Vincent Duindam, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc. Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 93, Oct. 2, 2019, 2 pages.
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'S Opening Brief In Support of Its Motion to Stay Case Pending inter Partes Review, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Jury Trial Demanded, Document 118, Oct. 30, 2019, 18 pages.
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Opening Brief in Support of Its Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(A), United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-LPS, Jury Trial Demanded, Document 15, Oct. 29, 2018, 25 pages.
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'S Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Demand for Jury Trial, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, 2019, 38 pages.
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Reply Brief in Support of Its Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Demand for Jury Trial, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 126, Nov. 15, 2019, 13 pages.
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Reply Brief in Support of Its Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.s.c. § 1404(a), United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Document 31, Nov. 18, 2018, 14 pages.
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Supplemental Corporate Disclosure Statement Per F.r.c.p. 7.1, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Jury Trial Demanded, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Apr. 17, 2019, 2 pages.
Defendant's Corporate Disclosure Statement per F.R.C.P. 7.1(a), United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-LPS, Jury Trial Demanded, Document 13, Oct. 25, 2018, 1 page.
Duncan, Roger, “Sensing Shape: Fiber-Bragg-grating sensor arrays monitor shape at a high resolution,” 2005, pp. 18-21, SPIE.
Excerpts from the deposition of Mark Edwin Rentschler, Ph.D., Oct. 21, 2019, 35 pages.
Excerpts from Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, 2003, 11th Edition, 3 pages.
Exhibit 1, Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Preliminary Election of Asserted Claims, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Demand for Jury Trial, Document 119-1, Aug. 9, 2019, 5 pages.
Exhibit 1, [Proposed] Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand for Jury Trial, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 43-2, 2019, 14 pages.
Exhibit 1, Declaration, Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(D) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Form 10-K, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Intuitive Surgical, Inc, Document 28-1, 2018, 12 pages.
Exhibit 1, Fox Chase Cancer Center Among First in U.S. to Use Innovative Technology for Lung Cancer Diagnosis, Temple Health, Retrieved from the Internet: (https://www.foxchase.org/news/2018-08-15-Monarch-Robotic-Bronchoscopy), Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 23-3, Aug. 15, 2018, 4 pages.
Exhibit 1, Morrison & Foerster, via Email, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. v. Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Sep. 9, 2019, Document 127-1, 22 pages.
Exhibit 10, “Auris Health Lands $220M to Expand Sales of Lung Testing Medical Robot,” exome, Frank Vinluan, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-10, 2018, 4 pages.
Exhibit 10, From: Dawson, Shaelyn K, Subject: Intuitive v. Auris: Summary of Sep. 26, 2019 meet-and-confer re: Intuitive's deficient production. Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 119-10, 2019, 4 pages.
Exhibit 11, “Auris Health Lands $220M to Expand Sales of Lung Testing Medical Robot,” Xcomony, Nov. 28, 2018, Auris, Auris Health, Inc , Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-11, 2018, 4 pages.
Exhibit 11, U.S Food and Drug Administration, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 119-11, Auris Surgical Robotics, Inc, Mar. 22, 2018, 12 pages.
Exhibit 12, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Form D, Notice of Exempt Offering of Securities, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-12, 2018, 7 pages.
Exhibit 13, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Form D, Notice of Exempt Offering of Securities, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-13, 2018, 7 pages.
Exhibit 14, “Auris Surgical Robotics Agrees to Acquire Hansen Medical,” Market Wired, Source: Hansen Medical, Inc. The Global Leader in Intravascular Robotics, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-14, Apr. 20, 2016, 2018, 4 pages.
Exhibit 15, Declaration, Delaware, U.S. District Court, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-15, 2018, 3 pages.
Exhibit 2, [proposed] Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 43-3, 2019, 19 pages.
Exhibit 2, Declaration, “Pairing Human Ingenuity with Technology,” Intuitive, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-2, 2018, 13 pages.
Exhibit 2, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,801,601, USPTO, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 119-2, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2019-01173, Jun. 12, 2019, 85 Pages.
Exhibit 2, UPMC Hamot First in U.S. to Use Innovative Robotic Technology to Detect Lung Cancer Earlier, UPMC Life Changing Medicine, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 23-4, 2018, 3 pages.
Exhibit 3, Declaration, Contact Intuitive, Office locations and contact Information, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-3, 2018, 5 pages.
Exhibit 3, Letter, Careers Audacious goals. Audacious challenges, Auris Health Inc, Retrieved from the Internet: (https://www.aurishealth.com/jobs?gh_jid=1256912), 2018, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 23-5, 7 pages.
Exhibit 3, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 6,800,056, USPTO, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 119-3, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2019-01189, Jun. 13, 2019, 73 Pages.
Exhibit 4, “da Vinci Robotic Surgery,” Christiana Care Health System, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center & Research Institute, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-4, 2018, 3 pages.
Exhibit 4, Letter, Robotic Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions, ClinicalTrials.gov, Document 23-6, Retrieved from the Internet: (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03727425), Auris Health, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 23-6, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03727425, 2018, 9 pages.
Exhibit 4, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 6,246,200, USPTO, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2019-01448, Document 119-4, Aug. 5, 2019, 86 pages.
Exhibit 5, “Auris Health, Ethicon's Neuwave Ink Robot-assisted Bronchoscope Ablation Dev Deal,” May 16, 2018, By Fink Densford, Retrieved from the Internet: (https://https://www.massdevice.com/auris-health-ethicons-neuwave-ink-robot-assisted-bronchoscope-ablation-dev-deal/), Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 23-7, 2018, MassDevice Medical Network, 12 pages.
Exhibit 5, Declaration, “Beebe Healthcare Introduces the da Vinci® Xi™ Robotic Surgical System,” Submitted by Rachel on Jun. 8, 2018, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-5, 4 Pages.
Exhibit 5, Petition for Inter Partes Review ot U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, USPTO, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2019-01496, Document 119-5, Aug. 15, 2019, 72 pages.
Exhibit 6, Declaration, “Fox Chase Cancer Center Among First in U.S. to Use Innovative Technology for Lung Cancer Diagnosis,” Philadelphia International Medicine® News Bureau, Fox Chase Cancer Center Temple Health, For Immediate Release, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-6, Aug. 23, 2018, 3 pages.
Exhibit 6, Letter, Nathan, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. et al. v. Auris Health, Inc., C.A. No. 18-1359-LPS, Document 23-8, 2018, 4 pages.
Exhibit 6, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,142,447, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2019-01533, Document 119-6, Aug. 29, 2019, 84 pages.
Exhibit 7, “UPMC Hamot First in U.S. to Use Innovative Robotic Technology to Detect Lung Cancer Earlier,” UPMC Life Changing Medicine, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-7, 2018, 3 pages.
Exhibit 7, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 6,491,701, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2019-01532, Document 119-7, Aug. 29, 2019, 79 Pages.
Exhibit 8, Careers Audacious goals. Audacious challenges, Auris, Retrieved from the Internet: (URL:http://https://www.aurishealth.com/jobs?gh_jid=1256912), Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-8, 2018, 8 pages.
Exhibit 8, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 6,522,906, USPTO, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, IPR2019-01547, Document 119-8, Aug. 30, 2019, 82 pages.
Exhibit 9, “Robotic Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions, ” ClinicalTrials.gov, U.S National Library of Medicine, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03727425, Auris Health, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-9, 2018, 8 pages.
Exhibit 9, Trial Statistics, USPTO, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 119-9, 2019, 12 pages.
Exhibit A, “Johnson & Johnson Announces Agreement to Acquire Auris Health, Inc,” Auris Health's Robotic Platform Expands Johnson & Johnson's Digital Surgery Portfolio, New Brunswick, NJ—Feb. 13, 2019, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 36-1, 2019, 4 pages.
Exhibit A, Da Vinci by Intuitive, enabling Surgical care to get patients back to what matters, Aug. 29, 2019, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 114-1, Retrieved from the internet: URL: [https://www.intuitive.com/en-us/products-and-services/da-vinci], pp. 4 pages.
Exhibit A, Intuitive, Annual Report 2017, Intuitive Surgical, Inc, www.intuitivesurgical.com, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 16-1, 2018, 144 pages.
Exhibit A, Letter, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. v. Auris Health, Inc., Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Doc 53-1, 2019, 86 pages.
Exhibit A, Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Notice of Deposition under Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(B)(6) Directed to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-LPS, Demand for Jury Trial, Document 23-1, Dec. 3, 2018, 7 pages.
Exhibit B, Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s First Set of Requests for Production of Documents to Defendant Auris Health, Inc, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc. Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-LPS, Document 23-2, Dec. 3, 2018, 9 pages.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 12840613.9 dated Oct. 6, 2015, 9 pages.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP20070798487, dated Jan. 30, 2015, 8 pages.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP19174999.3 dated Nov. 26, 2019, 10 pages.
Gagarina, T. et al., “Modeling and experimental analysis of a new bellow type actuators for active catheter end-effector,” Proc. 10th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2001, pp. 612-617, IEEE.
Gander, M.J. et al., “Bend measurement using Bragg gratings in multicore fibre,” Electronics Letter, Jan. 20, 2000, vol. 36, No. 2, 2 Pages.
Hagn U., et al., “DLR MiroSurge: A Versatile System for Research in Endoscopic Telesurgery,” International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2010, vol. 5 (2), 11 pages.
Hansen Medical, Inc., “Sensei: Discover Your Sixth Sense”, Brochure, 2007, 10 pages.
Hansen Medical, Inc., “Bibliography”, Jun. 22, 2005, 1 page, retrieved from the internet [URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20060714042735if_/http://hansenmedical.com/bibliography.aspx].
Hansen Medical, Inc., “System Overview”, 2005, 2 pages,retrieved from the internet [URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20060714043118if_/http://hansenmedical.com/system.aspx].
Hansen Medical, Inc., “Technology Advantages”, 2005, 1 page,retrieved from the internet [URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20060713011151if_/http://hansenmedical.com/advantages.aspx].
Hansen Medical, Inc., “Sensei-X:Robotic Catheter System”, Brochure, 2009, 5 pages.
Hill, Kenneth O., “Fiber Bragg grating technology fundamentals and overview,” IEEE Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 15, Issue 8, Aug. 1997, pp. 1263-1276.
Ikuta, Koji et al., “Development of remote microsurgery robot and new surgical procedure for deep and narrow space,” Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, 2003, pp. 1103-1108, vol. 1, IEEE.
Ikuta, Koji et al., “Shape memory alloy servo actuator system with electric resistance feedback and application for active endoscope,” Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1988, pp. 427-430, vol. 1, IEEE.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2012/059889, dated Mar. 29, 2013, 14 pages.
International Search Report for application No. PCT/US07/71085, dated Sep. 17, 2008, 2 pages.
Ion by Intuitive, A New Robotic Endoluminal Platform for Minimally Invasive Peripheral Lung Biopsy, Aug. 29, 2019, Retrived from the internet: [https://www.intuitive.com/en-us/products-andservices/ion], 5 pages.
Jin, Long et al., “Two-dimensional bend sensing with a cantilever-mounted FBG [Fiber Bragg Grating],” Meas. Sci. Technol., 2006, pp. 168-172, vol. 17, Institute of Physics Publishing.
Joint Claim Construction Brief, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 113, Oct. 29, 2019, 103 pages.
Joint Claim Construction Chart, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 76, Aug. 2, 2019, 31 pages.
Kenneth Salisbury Jr., “The heart of microsurgery,” The American Society of Mechanical Engineers , 1998, 12 pages.
Kreger, Stephen et al., “Optical Frequency Domain Reflectometry for High Density Multiplexing of Multi-Axis Fiber Bragg Gratings,” 16th International Conference on Optical Fiber Sensors (OFS-16), Oct. 2003, Nara, Japan, pp. 526-529.
Le Roux, P.D., et al., “Robot-assisted Microsurgery: A Feasibility Study in the Rat,” Neurosurgery, Mar. 2001, vol. 48 (3), pp. 584-589.
Lertpiriyasuwat, Vatchara et al., “Extended Kalman Filtering Applied to a Two-Axis Robotic Arm with Flexible Links,” International Journal of Robotics Research, 2000. vol. 19., No. 3, pp. 254-270.
Letter Response, Kelly E. Farnan, By CM/ECF, Richards Layton & Finger, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 24, RLF1 20392700v.1, Document 24, Dec. 4, 2018, 3 pages.
Letter, Shaw Keller LLP, By CM/ECF & Hand Delivery, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Oct. 29, 2019, Document 112, 1 page.
Lunwei Z., et al., “FBG Sensor Devices for Spatial Shape Detection of Intelligent Colonoscope,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Apr. 2004, New Orleans, Louisiana, pp. 835-840.
Markman Hearing, Before: The Honorable Maryellen Noreika. Case No. 18-1359(MN), Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Defendant: Auris Health, Inc., held on Nov. 20, 2019, pp. 1-162.
Marrouche N.F., et al., “AB32-1: Preliminary Human Experience Using a Novel Robotic Catheter Remote Control”, May 6, 2005, 1 page.
Martinez, A. et al., “Vector Bending Sensors Based on Fibre Bragg Gratings Inscribed by Infrared Femtosecond Laser,” Electronics Letters, 2005, pp. 472-474, vol. 41—Issue 8.
Measurand, “ShapeTape Overview,” Measurand ShapeTape Advantage, pp. 1-3, first posted Nov. 3, 2004. Internet<www.measurand.com/products/ShapeTape_overview.html>.
Meltz, Gerald, “Overview of Fiber Grating-Based Sensors,” Proceedings of SPIE Distributed Multiplexed Fiber Optic Sensors VI, Nov. 27, 1996, Eds. Kersey et al.,vol. 2838, pp. 2-22.
Memorandum Opinion, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359 (MN), May 31, 2019, 13 pages.
Memorandum Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359 (MN), 2019, 16 pages.
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Maryellen Noreika. Telephone Conference held on Aug. 21, 2019, 1 page.
Motion to Stay, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 117, Oct. 30, 2019, 2 pages.
Nambi M., et al., “A Compact Telemanipulated Retinal-Surgery System that Uses Commercially Available Instruments with a Quick-Change Adapter,” Journal of Medical Robotics Research, 2016, vol. 1 (2), 14 pages.
Office Action dated Jun. 17, 2014 for Japanese Application No. 20130179563 filed Aug. 30, 2013, 7 pages.
Oh S., et al., “P5-75: Novel Robotic Catheter Remote Control System: Safety and Accuracy in Delivering RF Lesions in All 4 Cardiac Chambers”, 2005, pp. S277-S278.
Olympus , Your Vision, Our Future. “Endoscope Overview 2008,” Evis Exera II, HDTV 1080, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 114-1, 6 pages.
Olympus Medical Systems, “Olympus ScopeGuide Receives FDA Clearance,” Press Release dated May 24, 2011, 2 pages.
Oral Order, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. et al. v. Auris Health, Inc, 1-18-cv-01359 (DED), docket entry 25, 2018, 1 Page.
Oral Order, re 37 Proposed Scheduling Order, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. et al. v. Auris Health, Inc, 1-18-cv-01359 (DED), 2019, 1 page.
Order Conduct of the Proceeding, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board,Case IPR2019-01173. Case IPR2019-01189, Case IPR2019-01496, Case IPR2019-01547, Dated Dec. 9, 2019, 04 pages.
Order Regarding Access to Source Code, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Mar. 21, 2019, 3 pages.
Order Scheduling Adr Teleconference, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 142, 2019, 4 pages.
Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359 (MN), Document 70, 2019, 1 page.
Partial European Search Report for Application No. EP19174999.3 dated Aug. 21, 2019, 11 pages.
Partial European Search Report for Application No. EP20120840613, dated Jun. 5, 2015, 5 pages.
Patent Owner's Preliminary Response for U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, Review No. IPR2019-01496 dated Nov. 22, 2019, 33 pages.
Patent Owner's Response to Supplemental Paper Regarding Claim Construction Arguments and Rulings in a Related District Court Action of U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, Review No. IPR2019-01496 dated Dec. 20, 2019, 4 pages.
PCT/US07/71085 Written Opinion, dated Sep. 17, 2008, 5 pages.
PCT/US09/46446 International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Dec. 14, 2009, 21 pages.
PCT/US09/46446 Partial International Search Report and Invitation to Pay Additional Fees, dated Sep. 18, 2009, 9 pages.
PCT/US2011/035113 International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Aug. 4, 2011, 13 pages.
Petitioner's Updated Exhibit List of U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, review No. IPR2019-01496 dated Dec. 9, 2019, pp. 1-4.
Petitioner's Updated Exhibit List of U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, review No. IPR2019-01496 dated Dec. 5, 2019, pp. 1-4.
Plaintiffs' First Notice of Rule 30(B)(6) Deposition of Defendant Auris Health, Inc, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Document 129, Case No. 18-1359-MN, 2019, 14 Pages.
Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Corporate Disclosure Statement, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Aug. 31, 2018, 1 page.
Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Notice of Subpoenas to Produce Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civil Action, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 82, 2019, 20 pages.
Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 26, Dec. 11, 2018, 23 pages.
Plaintiffs' Motion for Reargument Regarding Mar. 11, 2019 Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 43, Mar. 15, 2019, 8 pages.
Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Stay, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 121, Nov. 13, 2019, 21 pages.
Proposed Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Document 43-1, 2019, 1 page.
Proposed Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 37, 2019, 17 pages.
Proposed Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case 18-1359-MN, Document 41, 2019, 17 pages.
PTAB Teleconference for review No. IPR2019-01496 dated Dec. 6, 2019, Petitioner Auris Health, Inc, pp. 1-33.
Rassweiler J., et al., “The Role of Imaging and Navigation for Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery,” Journal of Endourology, May 2009, vol. 23 (5), pp. 793-802.
Reddy V.Y., et al., “P1-53: Porcine Pulmonary Vein Ablation Using a Novel Robotic Catheter Control System and Real-time Integration of CT Imaging with Electroanatomical Mapping”, 2005, p. S121.
Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark, To: Mail Stop 8, Director of USPTO, Alexandria, VA, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 3, 2018, 2 pages.
Rosenberg J.M., Artificial Intelligence & Robotics, 1986, 3 pages.
Rule 7.1.1 Certificate, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-01359-MN, Document 117-2, Oct. 30, 2019, 2 pages.
Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Document 42, 2019, 17 pages.
Shang, J. et al., “An Articulated Universal Joint Based Flexible Access Robot for Minimally Invasive Surgery,” 2011 IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), May 9-13, 2011, London, UK, pp. 1147-1152.
Shaw Keller LLP, Letter Proposed Scheduling Order, By CM/ECF & Hand Delivery, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 39, Feb. 28, 2019, 1 page.
Shaw Keller LLP, Letter to Request Scheduling of a Discovery Teleconference, By CM/ECF & Hand Delivery, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 20, Nov. 8, 2018, 1 page.
Shaw Keller LLP, Letter, Karen E. Keller, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Intuitive Surgical, Inc., et al. v. Auris Health, Inc., Document 23, By CM/ECF & Hand Delivery, Dec. 3, 2018, 4 pages.
Shaw Keller LLP, Letter, Written to Advise the Court that Auris has “Entered into a Definitive Agreement”, By CM/ECF & Hand Delivery, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 36, Feb. 20, 2019, 1 page.
Sheila Weller, He Helped Pioneer Robotic Surgery. Now He Wants to Reinvent Lung Cancer Care, JNJ.com, Apr. 2019, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 114-2, Retrived from the internet : [https://www.jnj.com/personal-stories/why-robotic-surgery-pioneer-frederic-moll-is-now-tackling-lung-cancer-care], 6 pages.
Slepian M.J., “Robotic Catheter Intervention: The Hansen Medical Sensei™ Robotic Catheter System,” 2010, 28 pages.
Stieber, Michael E. et al., “Vision-Based Sensing and Control for Space Robotics Applications,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Aug. 1999, vol. 48, No. 4, pp. 807-812.
Sturges R.H. Jr., et al., “A Voice-Actuated, Tendon-Controlled Device for Endoscopy”, 1996, pp. 603-617.
Sturges, Robert H. et al., “A Flexible, Tendon-Controlled Device for Endoscopy,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, 1993, vol. 12(2), pp. 121-131.
Super Dimension, “How it Works”, 2005, 2 pages, retrieved from the internet [URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20070510094239/http://www.superdimension.com/new_resources.html].
Super Dimension,“Overview”, 2005, 2 pages, retrieved from the internet [URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20070510094239/http://www.superdimension.com/new_resources.html].
Super Dimension,“System Elements”, 2005, 2 pages, retrieved from the internet [URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20070510094239/http://www.superdimension.com/new_resources.html].
Supplemental Briefing Regarding Claim Construction Arguments and Rulings in Parallel District Court Action of U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, Review No. IPR2019-01496 dated Dec. 13, 2019, 5 pages.
Szewczyk, Jerome et al., “An active tubular polyarticulated micro-system for flexible endoscope,” Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences. vol. 271, Experimental Robotics VII, 2000, pp. 179-188, Springer-Verlag.
Tab 1, “Declaration of Stephen J. Blumenkranz in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer,” United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Demand for Jury Trial, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 29-1, 2018, 3 pages.
Tab 2, “Declaration of Thomas G. Cooper in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer,” United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand for Jury Trial, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 29-2, 2018, 3 pages.
Tab 3, “Declaration of Nicola Diolaiti in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer,” United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand for Jury Trial, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 29-3, 2018, 3 pages.
Tab 4, “Declaration of Vincent Duindam in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer,” Demand for Jury Trial, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 29-4, Demand for Jury Trial, 2018, 3 pages.
Tab 5,“Declaration of Carolyn M. Fenech in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer,” United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand for Jury Trial, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 29-5, 2018, 3 pages.
Tab 6, “Declaration of Gary S. Guthart in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer,” United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand for Jury Trial, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 29-6, 2018, 3 pages.
Tab 7, “Declaration of Catherine J. Mohr in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer,” Demand for Jury Trial, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 29-7, 2018, 3 pages.
Tab 8, “Declaration of Robert Matthew Ohline in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer,”United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand for Jury Trial, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 29-8, 2018, 3 pages.
Tab 9, “Declaration of David J. Rosa in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer,” : United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand for Jury Trial, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 29-9, 2018, 3 pages.
The Da Vinci Surgical system, Retrieved from the internet: [http://web.archive.org/web/20080724022504/http:/www.intuitivesurgical.com/products/davinci_surgicalsystem/], 2 pages.
Transcript Teleconference, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359(MN), Document 58, 2019, 11 pages.
Transcript, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-(MN), Document 83, 9 pages.
Vertut, Jean and Phillipe Coiffet, Robot Technology: Teleoperation and Robotics Evolution and Development, English translation, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Inglewood Cliffs, NJ, USA 1986, vol. 3A, 332 pages.
Waldman H., Dictionary of Robotics, 1985, 4 pages.
Wang, Yi-Ping et al., “A novel long period fiber grating sensor measuring curvature and determining bend-direction simultaneously,” IEEE Sensors Journal, 2005, pp. 839-843, vol. 5—Issue: 5, IEEE.
Webster, Robert J. III et al., “Toward Active Cannulas: Miniature Snake-Like Surgical Robots,” 2006, 7 pages.
Wong, Allan C. L. et al., “Multiplexed fibre Fizeau interferometer and fibre Bragg grating sensor system for simultaneous measurement of quasi-static strain and temperature using discrete wavelet transform,” Measurement Science and Technology, 2006, pp. 384-392, vol. 17—Issue 2, Institute of Physics Publishing.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200254223 A1 Aug 2020 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 15257387 Sep 2016 US
Child 16863067 US
Parent 13274208 Oct 2011 US
Child 15257387 US