Medical devices that navigate body lumens need to be physically small enough to fit within the lumen. Lung catheters, for example, which may be used to perform minimally invasive lung biopsies or other medical procedures, may need to follow airways that decrease in size as the catheter navigates branching passages. To reach a target location in a lung, a catheter may need to follow passages having diameters as small as 3 mm or less. Manufacturing a catheter that includes the mechanical structures suitable for remote or robotic operation and that has a diameter that is sufficiently small to navigate such small lumens can be challenging. In particular, one desirable configuration for remotely operated catheter would provide a tool mounted on a steerable segment; tendons or pull wires that extend down the length of the catheter to an external drive system that pulls on the tendons to actuate the tool or steerable segment; lumens for suction and/or irrigation; a vision system for viewing of the target location; and sensors to identify the location of the instrument relative to a patient's body. Accommodating all of the desired features and elements of a lung catheter or other device having a diameter about 3 mm or less can be difficult.
In accordance with an aspect of the invention, a catheter system has a removable vision probe that can be replaced with a biopsy probe or other medical probe. The vision probe may be used for navigation to a work site and then removed and replaced with the biopsy probe that takes a tissue sample. The catheter system can thus provide a high level of vision and medical functionality in a small diameter. Control logic for robotic actuation of the catheter adjust for issues that may occur if the catheter moves while the tools or probes are swapped or if the patient moves. In particular, when the vision probe is removed, feedback control and a distal sensor (such as a fiber-optic shape sensor) are used to maintain or return to the desired location or working configuration for use of the biopsy probe. The feedback information from the sensor thus can be used to control the actuator tendons such that the working configuration of a distal tip of the catheter is maintained even under disturbances due to tool removal or anatomy motion. In this way, accuracy of the catheter system is maintained and biopsy yield may be improved. Instead of maintaining a constant working configuration, parameters of the desired working configuration can be recorded, and the catheter can be straightened or relaxed for easier removal and insertion of probes and subsequently returned to the desired working configuration after a new probe has been inserted or upon user indication.
One specific embodiment of the invention is a medical system including a catheter and control logic. The catheter includes a main lumen and a mechanical system. The main lumen accommodates either a vision probe or a medical probe and is too narrow to simultaneously guide both a vision probe and a medical probe to the distal tip. The control logic operates the mechanical system to control a pose of a distal tip of the catheter. In particular, the control logic can identify a desired working configuration of the distal tip while the vision probe is deployed and can hold or return the catheter to the desired working configuration when the vision probe has been removed from the catheter and the medical probe is deployed in the main lumen.
Another specific embodiment of the invention is a medical system including a removable vision probe and a catheter. The catheter has a lumen sized to guide either the vision system or a medical tool to a distal tip of the catheter. Further, the catheter has a width less than about 3 mm and is too narrow to simultaneously guide both the vision probe and the medical probe to the distal tip.
Yet another embodiment of the invention is a process that includes: using a vision probe deployed in a catheter when identifying a working configuration of a distal tip of the catheter, removing the vision probe from the catheter; deploying a medical probe in place of the vision probe that was removed; and actuating the catheter to maintain or return to the working configuration of the distal tip when a medical probe is deployed in the catheter in place of the vision probe.
Use of the same reference symbols in different figures indicates similar or identical items.
A catheter system can employ a vision probe that is interchangeable with one or more medical probes or tools. The vision probe can be removed and replaced with a medical probe used in a medical procedure. The interchanging of the vision and medical probes may permit the catheter system to have a smaller diameter and thus navigate smaller passages than would a similar system that simultaneously accommodates both vision and medical systems. Alternatively, interchanging probes allow more space for vision and medical systems having greater functionality than might a catheter that must simultaneously accommodate both vision and medical systems.
One method for using a catheter system includes steering a catheter along a body lumen for at least part of the path to a work site for a medical procedure. A vision system may then be deployed in the catheter during the steering and/or used to view the work site reached when navigation is complete. The vision system can also be used to help identify a desired working configuration for the catheter and when manipulating the catheter into the desired working configuration. The control system of the catheter can then record the working configuration and may be placed in a “holding” mode in which the pose of the catheter relative to a patient is monitored and the catheter is actuated to actively maintain or return to the recorded working configuration. The control system may provide different types of control modes, which may be useful for different types of medical probes or different types of medical procedures. For example, if the medical probe includes a laser, a combination of the location and orientation of the distal tip of the catheter can be controlled so that the distal tip remains targeted on a specific location in the patient. An alternative holding mode can maintain the location of the distal tip of the catheter while permitting the orientation of the distal tip to change or maintain a distal tip along a line.
Catheter 110 is a generally flexible device having one or more lumens including a main lumen that can accommodate interchangeable probes such as described further below. Flexible catheters can be made using a braided structure such as a woven wire tube with inner or outer layers of a flexible or low friction material such as polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). In one embodiment, catheter 110 includes a bundle of lumens or tubes held together by a braided jacket and a reflowed (i.e., fused by melting) jacket of a material such as Polyether Block Amide (Pebax). Alternatively, an extrusion of a material such as Pebax can similarly be used to form multiple lumens in catheter 110. Catheter 110 particularly includes a main lumen for interchangeable probe systems and smaller lumens for pull wires and sensor lines. In the illustrated embodiment, catheter 110 has a proximal section 112 attached to drive interface 120 and a distal section 114 that extends from the proximal section 112. An additional steerable segment 116 (e.g., a metal structure such as shown in
The overall length of catheter 110 may be about 60 to 80 cm or longer with distal section 114 being about 15 cm long and steerable segment 116 being about 4 to 5 cm long. In accordance with an aspect of the invention, distal section 114 has a smaller diameter than does proximal section 112 and thus can navigate smaller natural lumens or passages. During a medical procedure, at least a portion of proximal section 112 and all of distal section 114 may be inserted along a natural lumen such as an airway of a patient. The smaller diameter of distal section 114 permits use of distal section 114 in lumens that may be too small for proximal section 112, but the larger diameter of distal section 114 facilitates inclusion of more or larger structures or devices such as electromagnetic (EM) sensors 162 that may not fit in distal section 114.
Steerable segment 116 is remotely controllable and particularly has a pitch and a yaw that can be controlled using pull wires. Steerable segment 116 may include all or part of distal section 114 and may be simply implemented as a multi-lumen tube of flexible material such as Pebax. In general, steerable segment 116 is more flexible than the remainder of catheter 110, which assists in isolating actuation or bending to steerable segment 116 when drive interface 120 pulls on actuating tendons. Catheter 110 can also employ additional features or structures such as use of Bowden cables for actuating tendons to prevent actuation from bending proximal section 112 (or bending any portion the section of 114 other than steerable segment 116) of catheter 110.
Drive interfaces 120 of
A dock 126 in drive interface 120 can provide a mechanical coupling between drive interface 120 and catheter 110 and link actuation tendons to transmission 124. Dock 126 may additionally contain electronics for receiving and relaying sensor signals from portions of sensor system 160 in catheter 110 and contain an electronic or mechanical system for identifying the probe or the type of probe deployed in catheter 110.
Control logic 140 controls the actuators in drive interface 120 to selectively pull on the tendons as needed to actuate and steer steerable segment 116. In general, control logic 140 operates in response to commands from a user, e.g., a surgeon or other medical personnel using operator interface 150, and in response to measurement signals from sensor system 160. However, in holding modes as described further below, control logic 140 operates in response to measurement signals from sensor system 160 to maintain or acquire a previously identified working configuration. Control logic 140 may be implemented using a general purpose computer with suitable software, firmware, and/or interface hardware to interpret signals from operator interface 150 and sensor system 160 and to generate control signals for drive interface 120.
In the illustrated embodiment, control logic 140 includes multiple modules 141, 142, 143, and 144 that implement different processes for controlling the actuation of catheter 110. In particular, modules 141, 142, 143, and 144 respectively implement a position stiffening mode, an orientation stiffening mode, a target position mode, and a target axial mode, which are described further below. A module 146 selects which control process will be used and may base the selection on user input, the type or status of the probe deployed in catheter 110, and the task being performed. Control logic 140 also includes memory storing parameters 148 of a working configuration of steerable segment 116 that is desired for a task, and each of the modules 141, 142, 143, and 144 can uses their different control processes to actively maintain or hold the desired working configuration.
Operator interface 150 may include standard input/output hardware such as a display, a keyboard, a mouse, a joystick, or other pointing device or similar I/O hardware that may be customized or optimized for a surgical environment. In general, operator interface 150 provides information to the user and receives instructions from the user. For example, operator interface 150 may indicate the status of system 100 and provide the user with data including images and measurements made by system 100. One type of instruction that the user may provide through operator interface 150, e.g., using a joystick or similar controller, indicates the desired movement or position of steerable segment 116, and using such input, control logic 140 can generate control signals for actuators in drive interface 120. Other instructions from the user can select an operating mode of control logic 140.
Sensor system 160 generally measures a pose of steerable segment 116. In the illustrated embodiment, sensor system 160 includes EM sensors 162 and a shape sensor 164. EM sensors 162 include one or more conductive coils that may be subjected to an externally generated electromagnetic field. Each coil of EM sensors 162 then produces an induced electrical signal having characteristics that depend on the position and orientation of the coil relative to the externally generated electromagnetic field. In an exemplary embodiment, EM sensors 162 are configured and positioned to measure six degrees of freedom, e.g., three position coordinates X, Y, and Z and three orientation angles indicating pitch, yaw, and roll of a base point. The base point in system 100 is at or near the end of proximal section 112 and the start of distal section 114 of catheter 110. Shape sensor 164 in the exemplary embodiment of the invention includes a fiber grating that permits determination of the shape of a portion of catheter 110 extending from the base point, e.g., the shape of distal section 114 or steerable segment 116. Such shape sensors using fiber gratings are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,720,322, entitled “Fiber Optic Shape Sensor” and U.S. Pat. No. 7,930,065, entitled “Robotic Surgery System Including Position Sensors using Fiber Bragg Gratings,” which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. An advantage of the illustrated type of sensor system 160 is that EM sensors 162 can provide measurements relative to the externally generated electrical field, which can be calibrated relative to a patient's body. Thus, system 160 can use EM sensors 162 to reliably measure the position and orientation of a base point for shape sensor 164, and shape sensor 164 need only provide shape measurement for a relatively short distance. Additionally, distal section 114 only contains shape sensor 164 and may have a diameter that is smaller than the diameter of proximal section 112. More generally, sensor system 160 need only be able to measure the pose of steerable segment 116, and other types of sensors could be employed.
The specific dimensions described in above are primarily for a catheter that accommodates probes having a diameter of 2 mm, which is a standard size for existing medical tools such as lung biopsy probes. However, alternative embodiments of the invention could be made larger or smaller to accommodate medical probes with a larger or smaller diameter, e.g., 1 mm diameter probes. A particular advantage of such embodiments is that a high level of functionality is provided in a catheter with relative small outer diameter when compared to the size of probe used in the catheter.
Main lumen 312 is sized to accommodate a variety of medical probes. One specific probe is a vision probe 400 such as illustrated in
Vision probe 400 is adapted to be inserted or removed from catheter 110 while catheter 110 is in use for a medical procedure. Accordingly, vision probe 400 is generally free to move relative to catheter 110. While movement relative to catheter 110 is necessary or desirable during insertion or removal of vision probe 400, the orientation of a vision probe 400 (and some medical probes) may need to be known for optimal or easier use. For example, a user viewing video from vision probe 400 and operating a controller similar to a joystick to steer catheter 110 generally expects the directions of movement of the controller to correspond to the response of steerable segment 116 and the resulting change in the image from vision probe 400. Operator interface 150 needs (or at least can use) information on the orientation of vision probe 400 relative to tendons 230 in order to provide a consistency in directions used in the user interface. In accordance with an aspect of the invention, a keying system (not shown) can fix vision probe 400 into a known orientation relative to catheter 110 and tendons 230. The keying system may, for example, include a spring, fixed protrusion, or latch on vision probe 400 or steerable segment 116 and a complementary notch or feature in steerable segment 116 or vision probe 400.
Vision probe 400 is only one example of a probe system that may be deployed in catheter 110 or guided through catheter 110 to a work site. Other probe systems that may be used include, but are not limited to, biopsy forceps, biopsy needles, biopsy brushes, ablation lasers, and radial ultrasound probes. In general, catheter 110 can be used with existing manual medical probes that are commercially available from medical companies such as Olympus Europa Holding GmbH.
The catheter system 100 of
When steerable segment 116 reaches the target work site, vision probe 400 can be used to view the work site as in step 530 and to pose steerable segment 116 for performance of a task at the target work site as in step 540. Posing of steerable segment 116 may use images or visual information from vision probe 400 and measurements from sensor system 160 to characterize the work site and determine the desired working configuration. The desired working configuration may also depend on the type of tool that will be used or the next medical task. For example, reaching a desired working configuration of catheter 110 may bring the distal tip of steerable segment 116 into contact with tissue to be treated, sampled, or removed with a medical tool that replaces vision probe 400 in catheter 110. Another type of working configuration may point steerable segment 116 at target tissue to be removed using an ablation laser. For example, tissue could be targeted in one or more 2D camera views while vision probe 400 is still in place in catheter 110, or target tissue can be located on a virtual view of the work site using pre-operative 3D imaging data together with the position sensing relative to patient anatomy. Still another type of working configuration may define a line for the insertion of a needle or other medical tool into tissue, and the working configuration includes poses in which the distal tip of steerable segment 116 is along the target line. In general, the desired working configuration defines constraints on the position or the orientation of the distal tip of steerable segment 116, and the shape of more proximal sections of catheter 110 is not similarly constrained and may vary as necessary to accommodate the patient.
Step 550 stores in memory of the control logic parameters that identify the desired working configuration. For example, the position of a distal tip or target tissue can be defined using three coordinates. A target line for a need can be defined using the coordinates of a point on the line and angles indicating the direction of the line from that point. In general, control logic 120 uses the stored parameters that define the desired working configuration when operating in a holding mode that maintains steerable segment 116 of catheter 110 in the desired working configuration as described further below.
Step 560 selects and activates a holding mode of the catheter system after the desired working configuration has been established and recorded. Control logic 140 for catheter 110 of
1.) A position stiffness mode compares the position of the distal tip of steerable segment 116 as measured by sensor system 160 to a desired tip position and controls the actuators to minimize the difference in desired and measured tip positions. The position stiffness mode may particularly be suitable for general manipulation tasks in which the user tries to precisely control the position of the tip and for situations where the distal tip contacts tissue.
2.) An orientation stiffness mode compares the measured orientation or pointing direction of the distal tip to a desired pointing direction of the distal tip and controls the actuators to minimize the difference in desired and actual tip pointing direction. This orientation stiffening that may be suitable, e.g., when controlling an imaging device such as vision probe 400 attached steerable segment 116, in which case the viewing direction is kept as desired, while the exact position of steerable segment 116 may be less important.
3.) A target position stiffness mode uses a combination of the measured tip position and pointing direction to control catheter 110 to always point the distal tip of steerable segment 116 towards a specified target point some distance in front of steerable segment 116. In case of external disturbances, control logic 140 may control the actuators to implement this target position stiffening behavior, which may be suitable, e.g., when a medical probe inserted though the catheter contains an ablation laser that should always be aimed at a target ablation point in tissue.
4.) A target axial motion stiffness mode uses a combination of the measured tip position and pointing direction to ensure that the distal tip of steerable segment 116 is always on a line in space and has a pointing direction that is also along that line. This mode can be useful, e.g., when inserting a biopsy needle along a specified line into tissue. Tissue reaction forces could cause the flexible section of catheter 110 to bend while inserting the needle, but this control strategy would ensure that the needle is always along the right line.
The selection of a mode in step 560 could be made through manual selection by the user, based on the type of probe that is being used (e.g., grasper, camera, laser, or needle) in catheter 110, or based on the activity catheter 110 is performing. For example, when a laser is deployed in catheter 110, control logic 120 may operate in position stiffness mode when the laser deployed in catheter 110 is off and operate in target position stiffness mode to focus the laser on a desired target when the laser is on. When “holding” is activated, control logic 140 uses the stored parameters of the working configuration (instead of immediate input from operator interface 150) in generating control signals for drive interface 120.
The vision probe is removed from the catheter in step 570, which clears the main lumen of catheter 110 for the step 580 of inserting a medical probe or tool through catheter 110. For the specific step order shown in
In one alternative for the step order of process 500, catheter 110 may not be in a holding mode while the medical probe is inserted but can be switched to holding mode after the medical probe is fully deployed. For example, catheter 110 may be relaxed or straightened for easy remove of vision probe 400 (step 570) and insertion of the medical probe (step 580). Once holding mode is initiated, e.g., after insertion of the medical probe, control logic 140 will control the drive interface 130 to return steerable segment 116 to the desired working configuration if steerable segment 116 has moved since being posed in the desired working configuration. Thereafter, control logic 140 monitors the pose of steerable segment 116 and actively maintains steerable segment 116 in the desired working configuration while the medical task is performed in step 590.
Control logic 140 in step 620 determines a desired pose of steerable segment 116. For example, control logic 140 can determine desired position coordinates, e.g., X′, Y′, and Z′, of the end of steerable segment 116 and desired orientation angles, e.g., angles θ′X, θ′Y, and θ′Z of the center axis of steerable segment 116 relative to coordinate axes X, Y, and Z. The holding modes described above generally provide fewer than six constraints on the desired coordinates. For example, position stiffness operates to constrain three degrees of freedom, the position of the end of steerable segment 116 but not the orientation angles. In contrast, orientation stiffness mode constrains one or more orientation angles but not the position of end of steerable segment 116. Target position stiffness mode constrains four degrees of freedom, and axial stiffness mode constrains five degrees of freedom. Control logic 610 can impose further constraints to select one of set of parameters, e.g., X′, Y′, and Z′ and angles θ′X, θ′Y, and θ′Z, that provides the desired working configuration. Such further constraints include but are not limited to mechanical constraints required by the capabilities of steerable segment 116 and of catheter 110 generally and utilitarian constraints such as minimizing movement of steerable segment 116 or providing desired operating characteristics such as smooth, non-oscillating, and predictable movement with controlled stress in catheter 110. Step 620 possibly includes just keeping a set pose steerable segment 116 by finding smallest movement from the measured pose to a pose satisfying the constraints, e.g., finding the point on the target line closest to the measure position for axial motion stiffness or finding some suitable pose from registered pre-op data that is close to the current pose.
Control logic 140 in step 630 uses the desired and/or measured poses to determine corrected control signals that will cause drive interface 120 to move steerable segment 116 to the desired pose. For example, the mechanics of catheter 110 and drive interface 120 may permit development of mappings from the desired coordinates X′, Y′, and Z′ and angles θ′X, θ′Y, and θ′Z to actuator control signals that provide the desired pose. Other embodiments may use differences between the measured and desired pose to determine corrected control signals. In general, the control signals may be used not only to control actuators connected through tendons to steerable segment 116 but may also control (to some degree) insertion or roll of catheter 110 as a whole.
A branch step 650 completes a feedback loop by causing process 600 to return to measurement step 610 after control system 140 applies new control signals drive interface 120. The pose of distal tip is thus actively monitored and controlled according to fixed constraints as long as control system 120 remains in the holding mode. It may be noted, however, that some degrees of freedom of steerable segment 116 may not require active control. For example, in orientation stiffness mode, feedback control could actively maintain pitch and yaw of steerable segment 116, while the mechanical torsional stiffness of catheter 110 is relied on hold the roll angle fixed. However, catheter 110 in general may be subject to unpredictable external forces or patient movement that would otherwise cause catheter 110 to move relative to the work site, and active control as in process 600 is needed to maintain or hold the desired working configuration.
Some embodiments or elements of the above invention can be implemented in a computer-readable media, e.g., a non-transient media, such as an optical or magnetic disk, a memory card, or other solid state storage containing instructions that a computing device can execute to perform specific processes that are described herein. Such media may further be or be contained in a server or other device connected to a network such as the Internet that provides for the downloading of data and executable instructions.
Although the invention has been described with reference to particular embodiments, the description is only an example of the invention's application and should not be taken as a limitation. Various adaptations and combinations of features of the embodiments disclosed are within the scope of the invention as defined by the following claims.
This patent application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/257,387 filed Sep. 6, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/274,208 filed Oct. 14, 2011, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. This patent document is related to and incorporates by reference the following co-filed patent applications: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/274,198, filed Oct. 14, 2011 entitled “Catheters with Control Modes for Interchangeable Probes”; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/274,229, filed Oct. 14, 2011 entitled “Vision Probe and Catheter Systems”; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/274,237, filed Oct. 14, 2011 entitled “Catheter Sensor Systems.”
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3096962 | Meijs | Jul 1963 | A |
3546961 | Marton | Dec 1970 | A |
4437114 | Larussa | Mar 1984 | A |
4644237 | Frushour et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4748969 | Wardle | Jun 1988 | A |
4792715 | Barsky et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4809191 | Domeier et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4905082 | Nishigaki et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4949927 | Madocks et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5114403 | Clarke et al. | May 1992 | A |
5174276 | Crockard | Dec 1992 | A |
5201757 | Heyn et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5251611 | Zehel et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5280781 | Oku | Jan 1994 | A |
5285796 | Hughes | Feb 1994 | A |
5297536 | Wilk | Mar 1994 | A |
5307437 | Facq et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5351693 | Taimisto et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5408263 | Kikuchi et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5417210 | Funda et al. | May 1995 | A |
5429604 | Hammersmark et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5487757 | Truckai et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5588949 | Taylor et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5613946 | McKeever | Mar 1997 | A |
5617515 | MacLaren et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5624380 | Takayama et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5631973 | Green | May 1997 | A |
5643175 | Adair | Jul 1997 | A |
5672877 | Liebig et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5729129 | Acker | Mar 1998 | A |
5752112 | Paddock et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755713 | Bilof et al. | May 1998 | A |
5759151 | Sturges | Jun 1998 | A |
5792135 | Madhani et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797900 | Madhani et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5817084 | Jensen et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5855569 | Komi et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5868760 | McGuckin, Jr. | Feb 1999 | A |
5876325 | Mizuno et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892860 | Maron et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5899425 | Corey, Jr. et al. | May 1999 | A |
5899851 | Koninckx | May 1999 | A |
5976071 | Sekiya | Nov 1999 | A |
5982791 | Sorin et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6004016 | Spector | Dec 1999 | A |
6013024 | Mitsuda et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6030130 | Paddock et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6066090 | Yoon | May 2000 | A |
6120433 | Mizuno et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6132368 | Cooper | Oct 2000 | A |
6161032 | Acker | Dec 2000 | A |
6171277 | Ponzi | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188355 | Gilboa | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6191414 | Ogle et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198974 | Webster, Jr. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6200274 | McNeirney | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203493 | Ben-Haim | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6246200 | Blumenkranz et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253770 | Acker et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275628 | Jones et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6331181 | Tierney et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332089 | Acker et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6335617 | Osadchy et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6347892 | Paddock et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6352503 | Matsui et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366722 | Murphy et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6366799 | Acker et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371952 | Madhani et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6380732 | Gilboa | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389187 | Greenaway et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6396574 | Lee et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6432041 | Taniguchi et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441577 | Blumenkranz et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6451027 | Cooper et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453190 | Acker et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459926 | Nowlin et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470205 | Bosselmann et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6471710 | Bucholtz | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6478028 | Paolitto et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6484118 | Govari | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487352 | Sobiski et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6490467 | Bucholz et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6554793 | Pauker et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6571639 | May et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6572629 | Kalloo et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6574355 | Green | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6575644 | Paddock et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6578967 | Paddock et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6618612 | Acker et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6645196 | Nixon et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6648816 | Irion et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6671055 | Wavering et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671581 | Niemeyer et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6695871 | Maki et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6720988 | Gere et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6743239 | Kuehn et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6758843 | Jensen et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6783491 | Saadat et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6790173 | Saadat et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6817974 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6833814 | Gilboa et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6837846 | Jaffe et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6837847 | Ewers et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6866671 | Tierney et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6899672 | Chin et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6902560 | Morley et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6936042 | Wallace et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6942613 | Ewers et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6960162 | Saadat et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6960163 | Ewers et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6984203 | Tartaglia et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6991602 | Nakazawa et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6994703 | Wang et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6997870 | Couvillon, Jr. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7007699 | Martinelli et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7041052 | Saadat et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7042573 | Froggatt | May 2006 | B2 |
7090637 | Danitz et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7090683 | Brock et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7128708 | Saadat et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7139601 | Bucholz et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7197354 | Sobe | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7233820 | Gilboa | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7252660 | Kunz | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7277120 | Gere et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7320700 | Cooper et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7371028 | Gordon et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7398116 | Edwards | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7500947 | Kucklick et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7594912 | Cooper et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7607440 | Coste-Maniere et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7715105 | Forkey et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7720322 | Prisco et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7725214 | Diolaiti | May 2010 | B2 |
7772541 | Froggatt et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7853307 | Edwards | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7920909 | Lyon et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7922650 | McWeeney et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7930065 | Larkin et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7947000 | Vargas et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7962193 | Edwards et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8016749 | Clerc et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8335557 | Maschke | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8376934 | Takahashi et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8396595 | Dariush | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8442618 | Strommer et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8506555 | Ruiz Morales | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8554368 | Fielding et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8720448 | Reis | May 2014 | B2 |
8738181 | Greer et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8784303 | Laby et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8784435 | Cooper et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8827948 | Romo et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8858424 | Hasegawa et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8929631 | Pfister et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8945095 | Blumenkranz et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9014851 | Wong et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9060678 | Larkin et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9125639 | Mathis et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9129417 | Zheng et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9199372 | Henderson et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9226796 | Bowling et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9256940 | Carelsen et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9289578 | Walker et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9314306 | Yu | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9345456 | Tsonton et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9358682 | Ruiz Morales | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9387048 | Donhowe et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9452276 | Duindam et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9504604 | Alvarez | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9522034 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9561083 | Yu et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9622827 | Yu et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9629595 | Walker et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9636184 | Lee et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9675422 | Hourtash et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9713509 | Schuh et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9727963 | Mintz et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9737371 | Romo et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9737373 | Schuh | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9744335 | Jiang | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9763741 | Alvarez et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9788910 | Schuh | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9789608 | Itkowitz et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9818681 | Machida | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9844353 | Walker et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9844412 | Bogusky et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9867635 | Alvarez et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9931025 | Graetzel et al. | Apr 2018 | B1 |
9949749 | Noonan et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9955986 | Shah | May 2018 | B2 |
9962228 | Schuh et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9980785 | Schuh | May 2018 | B2 |
9993313 | Schuh et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10016900 | Meyer et al. | Jul 2018 | B1 |
10022192 | Ummalaneni | Jul 2018 | B1 |
10080576 | Romo et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10238837 | Duindam et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10299870 | Connolly et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10568700 | Donhowe et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10653866 | Duindam et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10682070 | Duindam | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10744303 | Duindam et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
20010049509 | Sekine et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020077550 | Rabiner et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087169 | Brock et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020120252 | Brock et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020143319 | Brock | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020151967 | Mikus et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156345 | Eppler et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161280 | Chatenever et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020173786 | Kortenbach et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030045778 | Ohline et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030050649 | Brock et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030182091 | Kukuk | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030236455 | Swanson et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236505 | Bonadio et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040024311 | Quaid et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040054355 | Gerbi et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040083808 | Rambow et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040116803 | Jascob et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040138525 | Saadat et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138529 | Wiltshire et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040147837 | MacAulay et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153191 | Grimm et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040202400 | Kochergin et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040249367 | Saadat et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040257021 | Chang et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004431 | Kogasaka et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050043718 | Madhani et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049486 | Urquhart et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050059960 | Simaan et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065397 | Saadat et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065398 | Adams | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065400 | Banik et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050096502 | Khalili | May 2005 | A1 |
20050102062 | Green | May 2005 | A1 |
20050131343 | Abrams et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050192532 | Kucklick et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050197536 | Banik et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050197557 | Strommer et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050215983 | Brock | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050222554 | Wallace et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050251176 | Swanstrom et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050256398 | Hastings et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050261551 | Couvillon, Jr. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050272977 | Saadat et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050284221 | Danisch et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004286 | Chang et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060013523 | Childlers et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015096 | Hauck et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060025652 | Vargas | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041293 | Mehdizadeh et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060095022 | Moll | May 2006 | A1 |
20060149418 | Anvari | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161045 | Merril et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161136 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060184016 | Glossop et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070013336 | Nowlin et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016070 | Grunwald et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070021738 | Hasser et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070043455 | Viswanathan et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070049908 | Boese et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055128 | Glossop et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055291 | Birkmeyer et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070065077 | Childers et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083217 | Eversull et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070089557 | Solomon et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070106116 | Sugimoto | May 2007 | A1 |
20070135803 | Belson | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070135886 | Maschke | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070137371 | Devengenzo et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150155 | Kawai et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070151391 | Larkin et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070156020 | Foley et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070173694 | Tsuji et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070197896 | Moll et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070225554 | Maseda et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070249911 | Simon | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070253599 | White et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070265503 | Schlesinger et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270642 | Bayer et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070283970 | Mohr et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070287884 | Schena | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070287889 | Mohr | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070287992 | Diolaiti et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070299353 | Harlev et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080046122 | Manzo et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080058861 | Cooper et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080064921 | Larkin et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080064927 | Larkin et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080064931 | Schena et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065097 | Duval et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065098 | Larkin et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065099 | Cooper et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065100 | Larkin | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065101 | Larkin | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065102 | Cooper | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065103 | Cooper et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065104 | Larkin et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065106 | Larkin | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065107 | Larkin et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065109 | Larkin et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065110 | Duval et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071288 | Larkin et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071289 | Cooper et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071290 | Larkin et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071291 | Duval et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080097155 | Gattani et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080103362 | Couvillon, Jr. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080108870 | Wiita et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080123921 | Gielen et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080140087 | Barbagli | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147089 | Loh et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080151041 | Shafer et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080156971 | Ogisu et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080159653 | Dunki-Jacobs et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080172049 | Bredno et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080231221 | Ogawa | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080249640 | Vittor et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255505 | Carlson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080287963 | Rogers et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080312771 | Sugiura | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090030307 | Govari et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090076534 | Shelton, IV et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090085807 | Anderson | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090088756 | Anderson | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090088774 | Swarup et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090096443 | Anderson | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105799 | Hekmat et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090118620 | Tgavalekos et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090123111 | Udd | May 2009 | A1 |
20090137952 | Ramamurthy et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090184825 | Anderson | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090198298 | Kaiser et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090231419 | Bayer | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090245600 | Hoffman et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090248040 | Cooper et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090281566 | Edwards et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090287354 | Choi | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090314131 | Bailey | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090322001 | Luke et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326322 | Diolaiti et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326552 | Diolaiti | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326553 | Mustufa et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100030115 | Fujimoto et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100041949 | Tolkowsky | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100076263 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076303 | McKinley | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082041 | Prisco | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100121138 | Goldenberg et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121139 | Ouyang et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100125284 | Tanner et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100210939 | Hartmann et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100222647 | Hashimshony et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100234856 | Stoianovici et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100256812 | Tsusaka et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274087 | Diolaiti et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100292535 | Paskar | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100331820 | Prisco et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332033 | Diolaiti et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110021903 | Strommer et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110028991 | Ikeda et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110040305 | Gomez et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110040404 | Diolaiti et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110054309 | Edwards | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110082365 | McGrogan et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110082462 | Suarez et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110092808 | Shachar et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110125032 | McIntyre et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110130750 | Ormsby et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110137122 | Kawai | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110152879 | Williams et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110153252 | Govari et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110160570 | Kariv et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110172680 | Younge et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110172687 | Woodruff et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110184241 | Zubiate et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110184276 | Lyon et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110196199 | Donhowe et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110196419 | Cooper | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110201883 | Cooper et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110201922 | Hezemans et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110202068 | Diolaiti et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110224684 | Larkin et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110224685 | Larkin et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110224686 | Larkin et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110224687 | Larkin et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110224688 | Larkin et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110224689 | Larkin et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110224825 | Larkin et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110237889 | Tanaka | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110277576 | Cooper | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110277579 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110277580 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110277775 | Holop et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110277776 | McGrogan et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110282356 | Solomon et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110282357 | Rogers et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110282358 | Gomez et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110282359 | Duval | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110282491 | Prisco et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110319910 | Roelle et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120000427 | Nilsson | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120010628 | Cooper et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120046522 | Naito | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120059249 | Verard et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120071752 | Sewell et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120116393 | Jimenez et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120123441 | Au et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120150075 | Ludwin et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120165608 | Banik et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120182409 | Moriyama et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120209293 | Carlson et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120215094 | Rahimian et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120253276 | Govari et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120289815 | Keast et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120328077 | Bouvier | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130085330 | Ramamurthy et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130090530 | Ramamurthy et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130096385 | Fenech et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130102846 | Sjostrom et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130131503 | Schneider et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130144124 | Prisco et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130165854 | Sandhu et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130165945 | Roelle et al. | Jun 2013 | A9 |
20130169272 | Eichler et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130172906 | Olson et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130218005 | Desai et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130223702 | Holsing et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130303944 | Duindam | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130325030 | Hourtash et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140114180 | Jain | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140135985 | Coste-Maniere et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140142591 | Alvarez et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140163664 | Goldsmith | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140296870 | Stern et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140296872 | Cooper et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140309649 | Alvarez et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140316420 | Ballard et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140357984 | Wallace et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140364870 | Alvarez et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150051592 | Kintz | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150088161 | Hata et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150101442 | Romo | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150104284 | Riedel | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150119628 | Bharat et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150119638 | Yu et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150164594 | Romo et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150164596 | Romo et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150202015 | Elhawary et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150223902 | Walker et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150265359 | Camarillo | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150265807 | Park et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150297864 | Kokish et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150335480 | Alvarez et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150342695 | He et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150359597 | Gombert et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150374956 | Bogusky | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160001038 | Romo et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160005168 | Merlet | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160005220 | Weingarten et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160005576 | Tsukamoto | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160007880 | Duindam | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160016319 | Remirez et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160029998 | Brister et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160045269 | Elhawary et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160051221 | Dickhans et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160066794 | Klinder et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160073928 | Soper et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160081568 | Kolberg et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160100772 | Ikuma et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160228032 | Walker et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160270865 | Landey et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160278865 | Capote et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160287111 | Jacobsen | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160287279 | Bovay et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160296294 | Moll et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160331469 | Hall et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160338787 | Popovic et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160346924 | Hasegawa et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160354057 | Hansen et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160360947 | Iida et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160360949 | Hyodo et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160374541 | Agrawal et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170007337 | Dan | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170056215 | Nagesh et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170068796 | Passerini et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170100199 | Yu et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170119413 | Romo | May 2017 | A1 |
20170119481 | Romo et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170151027 | Walker et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170165011 | Bovay et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170165503 | Hautvast et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170172673 | Yu et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170202627 | Sramek et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170209073 | Sramek et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170251988 | Weber et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170280978 | Yamamoto et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170281049 | Yamamoto et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170290631 | Lee et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170304015 | Tavallaei et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170325715 | Mehendale et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170333679 | Jiang | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170340396 | Romo et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170365055 | Mintz et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170367782 | Schuh et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180025666 | Ho et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180177383 | Noonan et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180177556 | Noonan | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180177561 | Mintz et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180214011 | Graetzel et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180221038 | Noonan et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180221039 | Shah | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180250083 | Schuh et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180250085 | Simi et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180271616 | Schuh et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180279852 | Rafii-Tari et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180280660 | Landey et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180289243 | Landey et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180289431 | Draper et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20190192819 | Duindam et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20200023201 | Overweg | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200146757 | Fenech et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200275860 | Duindam | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20210016061 | Duindam et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101088451 | Dec 2007 | CN |
101247847 | Aug 2008 | CN |
101404921 | Apr 2009 | CN |
101918073 | Dec 2010 | CN |
102013100605 | Jul 2014 | DE |
1566150 | Aug 2005 | EP |
1800593 | Jun 2007 | EP |
2158834 | Mar 2010 | EP |
2392435 | Dec 2011 | EP |
3025630 | Jun 2016 | EP |
S57190549 | Nov 1982 | JP |
H06285009 | Oct 1994 | JP |
H07504363 | May 1995 | JP |
H07505790 | Jun 1995 | JP |
H1020214 | Jan 1998 | JP |
2000093522 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000166936 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2001046529 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2003275223 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2008018007 | Jan 2008 | JP |
2008508987 | Mar 2008 | JP |
2009530069 | Aug 2009 | JP |
19990087101 | Dec 1999 | KR |
WO-9313916 | Jul 1993 | WO |
WO-9605768 | Feb 1996 | WO |
WO-9729690 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO-9744089 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO-0051486 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO-0156457 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO-0207809 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO-2004016155 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO-2005087128 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO-2006039092 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO-2006122061 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO-2007109418 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO-2007109778 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO-2007146987 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO-2008028149 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO-2008111070 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO-2008147961 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO-2009002701 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO-2009120940 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO-2009148317 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO-2010039394 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO-2011001300 | Jan 2011 | WO |
WO-2011085166 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO-2011100110 | Aug 2011 | WO |
WO-2011132409 | Oct 2011 | WO |
WO-2017048194 | Mar 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Exhibit I, Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s vs Defendant Auris Health, Inc, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Claim Construction, Case No. 18-1359 (MN), Nov. 20, 2019, 59 pages. |
Exhibit J, Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review 35 U.S.C. § 314, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, IPR2019-01496 U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276 B2, Before Ulrike W. Jenks, Tina E. Hulse, and James A. Worth, Administrative Patent Judges, Feb. 13, 2020, 21 pages. |
Exhibit K, Declaration of William Cimino Regarding U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, Sep. 27, 2016, in the United States Patent and Trademark, inventors: Vincent Duindam et al., 126 pages. |
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, Filed: Oct. 14, 2011, 113 pages. |
Patent Owner's Mandatory Notices of U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner: Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, IPR2019-01496, Sep. 3, 2019, 6 pages. |
Petitioner's Updated Exhibit List of U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, review No. IPR2019-01496 dated Oct. 15, 2019, 04 pages. |
Exhibit 1, Before Ulrike W. Jenks, Tina E. Hulse, and James A. Worth, Administrative Patent Judges, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc v. Patent Owner: Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., IPR2019-01173, Document 215-1, Entered: Dec. 16, 2019, 197 pages. |
Exhibit 1, Redacted in its Entirety, Demand for Jury Trial, Defendant Auris Health,Inc.'s First set of Requests for production to Plaintiffs, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Document 233-1, 2019, 1-70 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2018/039604 dated Sep. 14, 2018, 6 pages. |
Kukuk M., et al., “TBNA-protocols: Guiding TransBronchial Needle Aspirations Without a Computer in the Operating Room”, International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), Oct. 5, 2001, LNCS 2208, pp. 997-1006. |
Petitioner's Request for Rehearing of the Institution Decision of U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, Review No. IPR2019-01496 dated Mar. 16, 2020, 9 pages. |
Shaw Keller LLP, Responsive Letter to Honorable Maryellen Noreika from David M. Fry, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. vs Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Redacted—Public Version, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Document 236, Apr. 1, 2020, 1-117 pages. |
Shaw Keller LLP, Letter, The Honorable Maryellen Noreika from David M. Fry, Case No. 18-1359(MN), Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Defendant: Auris Health, Inc., held on Mar. 31, 2020, pp. 1-77. |
Stipulation Regarding U.S. Pat. No. 8,142,447, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Mar. 20, 2020, 2 pages. |
Verdaasdonk R., et al., “Effect of Microsecond Pulse Length and Tip Shape on Explosive Bubble Formation of 2.78 μm Er,Cr;YSGG and 2.94 μm Er:YAG Laser”, Proceedings of SPIE, Jan. 23, 2012, vol. 8221 (12), 1 page. |
[Proposed] Amended Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 61, 2019, 14 pages. |
[proposed] Order Regarding Access to Source Code, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 46, Mar. 21, 2019, 3 pages. |
[Proposed] Stipulated Protective Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 45, Mar. 21, 2019, 31 pages. |
Abbott, Daniel J. et al. “Design of an Endoluminal NOTES Robotic System,” Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2007, pp. 410-416. |
Al-Ahmad A., et al., “Early Experience with a Computerized Obotically Controlled Catheter System,” Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, Apr. 2005, vol. 12(3), pp. 199-202. |
Amended Joint Claim Construction Chart, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 123-1, Nov. 13, 2019, 31 pages. |
Amended Joint Claim Construction Chart, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 81, Aug. 29, 2019, 29 pages. |
Amending Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 62, 2019, 14 pages. |
Anisfield, Nancy: “Ascension Technology Puts Spotlight on DC Field Magnetic Motion Tracking,” HP Chronicle, Aug. 2000, vol. 17, No. 9, 3 Pages. |
Ascari, Luca et al., “A New Active Microendoscope for Exploring the Sub-Arachnoid Space in the Spinal Cord,” Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2003, pp. 2657-2662, vol. 2, IEEE. |
Auris Health, Inc.'s Opposition to Motion for Reargument Regarding Mar. 11, 2019 Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Jury Trial Demanded, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 52, Mar. 29, 2019, 8 pages. |
Barnes Industries, Inc., “How a Ball Screw Works,” 4 pages, Copyright 2007; Internet: http://www.barnesballscrew.com/ball.htm. |
Berthold III, John W., “Historical Review of Microbend Fiber-Optic Sensors,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 13, No. 7, Jul. 1995, pp. 1193-1199. |
Blue Road Research, “Overview of Fiber Optic Sensors,” 40 pages, first posted Dec. 8, 2004. Internet< www.bluerr.com/papers/Overview_of_FOS2.pdf>. |
Cao, Caroline G.L., “Designing Spatial Orientation in Endoscopic Environments,” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting, 2001, pp. 1259-1263. |
Cao, Caroline G.L., “Disorientation in Minimal Access Surgery: A Case Study,” Proceedings of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress, pp. 4-169-4-172. |
Childers, Brooks A., et al., “Use of 3000 Bragg grating strain sensors distributed on four eight-meter optical fibers during static load tests of a composite structure,” SPIE 8th International Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials, Mar. 4-8, 2001, Newport Beach, California, 10 Pages. |
Choi, Dong-Geol et al., “Design of a Spring Backbone Micro Endoscope,” Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2007, pp. 1815-1821. |
Compendium of Inventor Declarations in Support of Plaintiffs Intutive Surgical, Inc. and Intutive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Document 29, Dec. 11, 2018, 2 pages. |
Complaint for Patent Infringement, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand for Jury Trial, Aug. 31, 2018, 14 pages. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 11/762,185, filed Jun. 13, 2007. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,028, filed Jun. 13, 2006. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,029, filed Jun. 13, 2006. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,030, filed Jun. 13, 2006. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,075, filed Jun. 13, 2006. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,125, filed Jun. 13, 2006. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,126, filed Jun. 13, 2006. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,129, filed Jun. 13, 2006. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,131, filed Jun. 13, 2006. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,172, filed Jun. 13, 2006. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,198, filed Jun. 13, 2006. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,207, filed Jun. 13, 2006. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,328, filed Jun. 13, 2006. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 61/334,978, filed May 14, 2010. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,173, filed Jun. 13, 2006. |
Cowie, Barbara M., et al., “Distributive Tactile Sensing Using Fibre Bragg Grating Sensors for Biomedical Applications,” 1st IEEE / RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob 2006), Feb. 2006, pp. 312-317. |
Curriculum Vitae of Prof. Ron Alterovitz, Ph.D, Professor, Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Jan. 14, 2019, 22 pages. |
Danisch, Lee et al., “Spatially continuous six degree of freedom position and orientation sensor,” Sensor Review, 1999, vol. 19, Issue 2, pp. 106-112. |
Dario, Paolo et al., “A Miniature Device for Medical Intracavitary Intervention,” Micro Electro Mechanical Systems '91 Proc IEEE ‘An Investigation of Micro Structures, Sensors, Actuators, Machines and Robots’, 1991, pp. 171-175, IEEE. |
Declaration of David Styka in Support of Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Opening Brief in Support of Its Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(A), United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-LPS, Jury Trial Demanded. Document 18, 2018, 3 pages. |
Declaration of Kelly E. Farnan in Support of Auris Health, Inc.'s Opposition to Motion for Reargument Regarding Mar. 11, 2019 Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 53, 2019, 3 pages. |
Declaration of Laura E. Miller in Support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Stay, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Exihibit, Document 122, Nov. 13, 2019, 50 pages. |
Declaration of Laura Miller in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Reargument Regarding Mar. 11, 2019 Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 44, 2019, 1 page. |
Declaration of Nathan B. Sabri in Support of Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Opening Brief in Support of Its Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(A), United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-LPS, Jury Trial Demanded, Document 16, 2018, 7 pages. |
Declaration of Shaelyn K. Dawson in Support of Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Stay Case Pending Inter Partes Review, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 119, 2019, 3 pages. |
Declaration of Shaelyn K. Dawson in Support of Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Reply in Support of Its Motion to Stay Case Pending Inter Partes Review, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 127, 2019, 2 pages. |
Declaration of Taylor Patton in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Redacted—Public Version, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Document 30, Dec. 11, 2018, 15 pages. |
Declaration of Vera Ranieri in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359 MN, Document 28, Demand for Jury Trial, 2018, 4 pages. |
Declaration of Prof. Ron Alterovitz, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, 2019, 25 pages. |
Declaration of Professor Mark E. Rentschler, Ph.D, Mar. 2018, 58 pages. |
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Amended Notice of Deposition of Catherine J. Mohr, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Demand for Jury Trial, Document 99, Oct. 9, 2019, 2 pages. |
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Amended Notice of Deposition of Vincent Duindam, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 100, Demand for Jury Trial, Oct. 9, 2019, 2 pages. |
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Answer to Plaintiffs' Complaint for Patent Infringement, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-LPS, Jury Trial Demanded, Document 12, Oct. 25, 2018, 12 pages. |
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Notice of 30(B)(6) Deposition of Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 120, Nov. 12, 2019, 10 pages. |
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Notice of Deposition of Catherine J. Mohr, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 94. Oct. 2, 2019, 2 pages. |
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Notice of Deposition of Mark E. Rentschler, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Demand for Jury Trial, Document 103, Oct. 15, 2019, 2 pages. |
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'S Notice of Deposition of Tim Soper, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand for Jury Trial, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 87, Sep. 13, 2019, 2 pages. |
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Notice of Deposition of Vincent Duindam, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc. Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 93, Oct. 2, 2019, 2 pages. |
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'S Opening Brief In Support of Its Motion to Stay Case Pending inter Partes Review, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Jury Trial Demanded, Document 118, Oct. 30, 2019, 18 pages. |
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Opening Brief in Support of Its Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(A), United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-LPS, Jury Trial Demanded, Document 15, Oct. 29, 2018, 25 pages. |
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'S Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Demand for Jury Trial, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, 2019, 38 pages. |
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Reply Brief in Support of Its Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Demand for Jury Trial, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 126, Nov. 15, 2019, 13 pages. |
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Reply Brief in Support of Its Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.s.c. § 1404(a), United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Document 31, Nov. 18, 2018, 14 pages. |
Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Supplemental Corporate Disclosure Statement Per F.r.c.p. 7.1, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Jury Trial Demanded, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Apr. 17, 2019, 2 pages. |
Defendant's Corporate Disclosure Statement per F.R.C.P. 7.1(a), United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-LPS, Jury Trial Demanded, Document 13, Oct. 25, 2018, 1 page. |
Duncan, Roger, “Sensing Shape: Fiber-Bragg-grating sensor arrays monitor shape at a high resolution,” 2005, pp. 18-21, SPIE. |
Excerpts from the deposition of Mark Edwin Rentschler, Ph.D., Oct. 21, 2019, 35 pages. |
Excerpts from Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, 2003, 11th Edition, 3 pages. |
Exhibit 1, Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Preliminary Election of Asserted Claims, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Demand for Jury Trial, Document 119-1, Aug. 9, 2019, 5 pages. |
Exhibit 1, [Proposed] Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand for Jury Trial, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 43-2, 2019, 14 pages. |
Exhibit 1, Declaration, Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(D) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Form 10-K, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Intuitive Surgical, Inc, Document 28-1, 2018, 12 pages. |
Exhibit 1, Fox Chase Cancer Center Among First in U.S. to Use Innovative Technology for Lung Cancer Diagnosis, Temple Health, Retrieved from the Internet: (https://www.foxchase.org/news/2018-08-15-Monarch-Robotic-Bronchoscopy), Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 23-3, Aug. 15, 2018, 4 pages. |
Exhibit 1, Morrison & Foerster, via Email, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. v. Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Sep. 9, 2019, Document 127-1, 22 pages. |
Exhibit 10, “Auris Health Lands $220M to Expand Sales of Lung Testing Medical Robot,” exome, Frank Vinluan, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-10, 2018, 4 pages. |
Exhibit 10, From: Dawson, Shaelyn K, Subject: Intuitive v. Auris: Summary of Sep. 26, 2019 meet-and-confer re: Intuitive's deficient production. Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 119-10, 2019, 4 pages. |
Exhibit 11, “Auris Health Lands $220M to Expand Sales of Lung Testing Medical Robot,” Xcomony, Nov. 28, 2018, Auris, Auris Health, Inc , Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-11, 2018, 4 pages. |
Exhibit 11, U.S Food and Drug Administration, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 119-11, Auris Surgical Robotics, Inc, Mar. 22, 2018, 12 pages. |
Exhibit 12, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Form D, Notice of Exempt Offering of Securities, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-12, 2018, 7 pages. |
Exhibit 13, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Form D, Notice of Exempt Offering of Securities, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-13, 2018, 7 pages. |
Exhibit 14, “Auris Surgical Robotics Agrees to Acquire Hansen Medical,” Market Wired, Source: Hansen Medical, Inc. The Global Leader in Intravascular Robotics, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-14, Apr. 20, 2016, 2018, 4 pages. |
Exhibit 15, Declaration, Delaware, U.S. District Court, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-15, 2018, 3 pages. |
Exhibit 2, [proposed] Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 43-3, 2019, 19 pages. |
Exhibit 2, Declaration, “Pairing Human Ingenuity with Technology,” Intuitive, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-2, 2018, 13 pages. |
Exhibit 2, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,801,601, USPTO, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 119-2, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2019-01173, Jun. 12, 2019, 85 Pages. |
Exhibit 2, UPMC Hamot First in U.S. to Use Innovative Robotic Technology to Detect Lung Cancer Earlier, UPMC Life Changing Medicine, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 23-4, 2018, 3 pages. |
Exhibit 3, Declaration, Contact Intuitive, Office locations and contact Information, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-3, 2018, 5 pages. |
Exhibit 3, Letter, Careers Audacious goals. Audacious challenges, Auris Health Inc, Retrieved from the Internet: (https://www.aurishealth.com/jobs?gh_jid=1256912), 2018, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 23-5, 7 pages. |
Exhibit 3, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 6,800,056, USPTO, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 119-3, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2019-01189, Jun. 13, 2019, 73 Pages. |
Exhibit 4, “da Vinci Robotic Surgery,” Christiana Care Health System, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center & Research Institute, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-4, 2018, 3 pages. |
Exhibit 4, Letter, Robotic Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions, ClinicalTrials.gov, Document 23-6, Retrieved from the Internet: (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03727425), Auris Health, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 23-6, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03727425, 2018, 9 pages. |
Exhibit 4, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 6,246,200, USPTO, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2019-01448, Document 119-4, Aug. 5, 2019, 86 pages. |
Exhibit 5, “Auris Health, Ethicon's Neuwave Ink Robot-assisted Bronchoscope Ablation Dev Deal,” May 16, 2018, By Fink Densford, Retrieved from the Internet: (https://https://www.massdevice.com/auris-health-ethicons-neuwave-ink-robot-assisted-bronchoscope-ablation-dev-deal/), Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 23-7, 2018, MassDevice Medical Network, 12 pages. |
Exhibit 5, Declaration, “Beebe Healthcare Introduces the da Vinci® Xi™ Robotic Surgical System,” Submitted by Rachel on Jun. 8, 2018, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-5, 4 Pages. |
Exhibit 5, Petition for Inter Partes Review ot U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, USPTO, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2019-01496, Document 119-5, Aug. 15, 2019, 72 pages. |
Exhibit 6, Declaration, “Fox Chase Cancer Center Among First in U.S. to Use Innovative Technology for Lung Cancer Diagnosis,” Philadelphia International Medicine® News Bureau, Fox Chase Cancer Center Temple Health, For Immediate Release, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-6, Aug. 23, 2018, 3 pages. |
Exhibit 6, Letter, Nathan, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. et al. v. Auris Health, Inc., C.A. No. 18-1359-LPS, Document 23-8, 2018, 4 pages. |
Exhibit 6, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,142,447, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2019-01533, Document 119-6, Aug. 29, 2019, 84 pages. |
Exhibit 7, “UPMC Hamot First in U.S. to Use Innovative Robotic Technology to Detect Lung Cancer Earlier,” UPMC Life Changing Medicine, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-7, 2018, 3 pages. |
Exhibit 7, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 6,491,701, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Inter Partes Review No. IPR2019-01532, Document 119-7, Aug. 29, 2019, 79 Pages. |
Exhibit 8, Careers Audacious goals. Audacious challenges, Auris, Retrieved from the Internet: (URL:http://https://www.aurishealth.com/jobs?gh_jid=1256912), Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-8, 2018, 8 pages. |
Exhibit 8, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 6,522,906, USPTO, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner: Auris Health, Inc, Patent Owner Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, IPR2019-01547, Document 119-8, Aug. 30, 2019, 82 pages. |
Exhibit 9, “Robotic Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions, ” ClinicalTrials.gov, U.S National Library of Medicine, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03727425, Auris Health, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 28-9, 2018, 8 pages. |
Exhibit 9, Trial Statistics, USPTO, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 119-9, 2019, 12 pages. |
Exhibit A, “Johnson & Johnson Announces Agreement to Acquire Auris Health, Inc,” Auris Health's Robotic Platform Expands Johnson & Johnson's Digital Surgery Portfolio, New Brunswick, NJ—Feb. 13, 2019, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 36-1, 2019, 4 pages. |
Exhibit A, Da Vinci by Intuitive, enabling Surgical care to get patients back to what matters, Aug. 29, 2019, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 114-1, Retrieved from the internet: URL: [https://www.intuitive.com/en-us/products-and-services/da-vinci], pp. 4 pages. |
Exhibit A, Intuitive, Annual Report 2017, Intuitive Surgical, Inc, www.intuitivesurgical.com, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 16-1, 2018, 144 pages. |
Exhibit A, Letter, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. v. Auris Health, Inc., Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Doc 53-1, 2019, 86 pages. |
Exhibit A, Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Notice of Deposition under Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(B)(6) Directed to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-LPS, Demand for Jury Trial, Document 23-1, Dec. 3, 2018, 7 pages. |
Exhibit B, Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s First Set of Requests for Production of Documents to Defendant Auris Health, Inc, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc. Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-LPS, Document 23-2, Dec. 3, 2018, 9 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 12840613.9 dated Oct. 6, 2015, 9 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP20070798487, dated Jan. 30, 2015, 8 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP19174999.3 dated Nov. 26, 2019, 10 pages. |
Gagarina, T. et al., “Modeling and experimental analysis of a new bellow type actuators for active catheter end-effector,” Proc. 10th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2001, pp. 612-617, IEEE. |
Gander, M.J. et al., “Bend measurement using Bragg gratings in multicore fibre,” Electronics Letter, Jan. 20, 2000, vol. 36, No. 2, 2 Pages. |
Hagn U., et al., “DLR MiroSurge: A Versatile System for Research in Endoscopic Telesurgery,” International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2010, vol. 5 (2), 11 pages. |
Hansen Medical, Inc., “Sensei: Discover Your Sixth Sense”, Brochure, 2007, 10 pages. |
Hansen Medical, Inc., “Bibliography”, Jun. 22, 2005, 1 page, retrieved from the internet [URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20060714042735if_/http://hansenmedical.com/bibliography.aspx]. |
Hansen Medical, Inc., “System Overview”, 2005, 2 pages,retrieved from the internet [URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20060714043118if_/http://hansenmedical.com/system.aspx]. |
Hansen Medical, Inc., “Technology Advantages”, 2005, 1 page,retrieved from the internet [URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20060713011151if_/http://hansenmedical.com/advantages.aspx]. |
Hansen Medical, Inc., “Sensei-X:Robotic Catheter System”, Brochure, 2009, 5 pages. |
Hill, Kenneth O., “Fiber Bragg grating technology fundamentals and overview,” IEEE Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 15, Issue 8, Aug. 1997, pp. 1263-1276. |
Ikuta, Koji et al., “Development of remote microsurgery robot and new surgical procedure for deep and narrow space,” Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, 2003, pp. 1103-1108, vol. 1, IEEE. |
Ikuta, Koji et al., “Shape memory alloy servo actuator system with electric resistance feedback and application for active endoscope,” Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1988, pp. 427-430, vol. 1, IEEE. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2012/059889, dated Mar. 29, 2013, 14 pages. |
International Search Report for application No. PCT/US07/71085, dated Sep. 17, 2008, 2 pages. |
Ion by Intuitive, A New Robotic Endoluminal Platform for Minimally Invasive Peripheral Lung Biopsy, Aug. 29, 2019, Retrived from the internet: [https://www.intuitive.com/en-us/products-andservices/ion], 5 pages. |
Jin, Long et al., “Two-dimensional bend sensing with a cantilever-mounted FBG [Fiber Bragg Grating],” Meas. Sci. Technol., 2006, pp. 168-172, vol. 17, Institute of Physics Publishing. |
Joint Claim Construction Brief, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 113, Oct. 29, 2019, 103 pages. |
Joint Claim Construction Chart, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 76, Aug. 2, 2019, 31 pages. |
Kenneth Salisbury Jr., “The heart of microsurgery,” The American Society of Mechanical Engineers , 1998, 12 pages. |
Kreger, Stephen et al., “Optical Frequency Domain Reflectometry for High Density Multiplexing of Multi-Axis Fiber Bragg Gratings,” 16th International Conference on Optical Fiber Sensors (OFS-16), Oct. 2003, Nara, Japan, pp. 526-529. |
Le Roux, P.D., et al., “Robot-assisted Microsurgery: A Feasibility Study in the Rat,” Neurosurgery, Mar. 2001, vol. 48 (3), pp. 584-589. |
Lertpiriyasuwat, Vatchara et al., “Extended Kalman Filtering Applied to a Two-Axis Robotic Arm with Flexible Links,” International Journal of Robotics Research, 2000. vol. 19., No. 3, pp. 254-270. |
Letter Response, Kelly E. Farnan, By CM/ECF, Richards Layton & Finger, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 24, RLF1 20392700v.1, Document 24, Dec. 4, 2018, 3 pages. |
Letter, Shaw Keller LLP, By CM/ECF & Hand Delivery, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Oct. 29, 2019, Document 112, 1 page. |
Lunwei Z., et al., “FBG Sensor Devices for Spatial Shape Detection of Intelligent Colonoscope,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Apr. 2004, New Orleans, Louisiana, pp. 835-840. |
Markman Hearing, Before: The Honorable Maryellen Noreika. Case No. 18-1359(MN), Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Defendant: Auris Health, Inc., held on Nov. 20, 2019, pp. 1-162. |
Marrouche N.F., et al., “AB32-1: Preliminary Human Experience Using a Novel Robotic Catheter Remote Control”, May 6, 2005, 1 page. |
Martinez, A. et al., “Vector Bending Sensors Based on Fibre Bragg Gratings Inscribed by Infrared Femtosecond Laser,” Electronics Letters, 2005, pp. 472-474, vol. 41—Issue 8. |
Measurand, “ShapeTape Overview,” Measurand ShapeTape Advantage, pp. 1-3, first posted Nov. 3, 2004. Internet<www.measurand.com/products/ShapeTape_overview.html>. |
Meltz, Gerald, “Overview of Fiber Grating-Based Sensors,” Proceedings of SPIE Distributed Multiplexed Fiber Optic Sensors VI, Nov. 27, 1996, Eds. Kersey et al.,vol. 2838, pp. 2-22. |
Memorandum Opinion, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359 (MN), May 31, 2019, 13 pages. |
Memorandum Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359 (MN), 2019, 16 pages. |
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Maryellen Noreika. Telephone Conference held on Aug. 21, 2019, 1 page. |
Motion to Stay, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 117, Oct. 30, 2019, 2 pages. |
Nambi M., et al., “A Compact Telemanipulated Retinal-Surgery System that Uses Commercially Available Instruments with a Quick-Change Adapter,” Journal of Medical Robotics Research, 2016, vol. 1 (2), 14 pages. |
Office Action dated Jun. 17, 2014 for Japanese Application No. 20130179563 filed Aug. 30, 2013, 7 pages. |
Oh S., et al., “P5-75: Novel Robotic Catheter Remote Control System: Safety and Accuracy in Delivering RF Lesions in All 4 Cardiac Chambers”, 2005, pp. S277-S278. |
Olympus , Your Vision, Our Future. “Endoscope Overview 2008,” Evis Exera II, HDTV 1080, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 114-1, 6 pages. |
Olympus Medical Systems, “Olympus ScopeGuide Receives FDA Clearance,” Press Release dated May 24, 2011, 2 pages. |
Oral Order, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. et al. v. Auris Health, Inc, 1-18-cv-01359 (DED), docket entry 25, 2018, 1 Page. |
Oral Order, re 37 Proposed Scheduling Order, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. et al. v. Auris Health, Inc, 1-18-cv-01359 (DED), 2019, 1 page. |
Order Conduct of the Proceeding, Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board,Case IPR2019-01173. Case IPR2019-01189, Case IPR2019-01496, Case IPR2019-01547, Dated Dec. 9, 2019, 04 pages. |
Order Regarding Access to Source Code, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Mar. 21, 2019, 3 pages. |
Order Scheduling Adr Teleconference, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 142, 2019, 4 pages. |
Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359 (MN), Document 70, 2019, 1 page. |
Partial European Search Report for Application No. EP19174999.3 dated Aug. 21, 2019, 11 pages. |
Partial European Search Report for Application No. EP20120840613, dated Jun. 5, 2015, 5 pages. |
Patent Owner's Preliminary Response for U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, Review No. IPR2019-01496 dated Nov. 22, 2019, 33 pages. |
Patent Owner's Response to Supplemental Paper Regarding Claim Construction Arguments and Rulings in a Related District Court Action of U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, Review No. IPR2019-01496 dated Dec. 20, 2019, 4 pages. |
PCT/US07/71085 Written Opinion, dated Sep. 17, 2008, 5 pages. |
PCT/US09/46446 International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Dec. 14, 2009, 21 pages. |
PCT/US09/46446 Partial International Search Report and Invitation to Pay Additional Fees, dated Sep. 18, 2009, 9 pages. |
PCT/US2011/035113 International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Aug. 4, 2011, 13 pages. |
Petitioner's Updated Exhibit List of U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, review No. IPR2019-01496 dated Dec. 9, 2019, pp. 1-4. |
Petitioner's Updated Exhibit List of U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, review No. IPR2019-01496 dated Dec. 5, 2019, pp. 1-4. |
Plaintiffs' First Notice of Rule 30(B)(6) Deposition of Defendant Auris Health, Inc, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Document 129, Case No. 18-1359-MN, 2019, 14 Pages. |
Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Corporate Disclosure Statement, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Aug. 31, 2018, 1 page. |
Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Notice of Subpoenas to Produce Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civil Action, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 82, 2019, 20 pages. |
Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 26, Dec. 11, 2018, 23 pages. |
Plaintiffs' Motion for Reargument Regarding Mar. 11, 2019 Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 43, Mar. 15, 2019, 8 pages. |
Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Stay, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-MN, Document 121, Nov. 13, 2019, 21 pages. |
Proposed Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Document 43-1, 2019, 1 page. |
Proposed Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 37, 2019, 17 pages. |
Proposed Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case 18-1359-MN, Document 41, 2019, 17 pages. |
PTAB Teleconference for review No. IPR2019-01496 dated Dec. 6, 2019, Petitioner Auris Health, Inc, pp. 1-33. |
Rassweiler J., et al., “The Role of Imaging and Navigation for Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery,” Journal of Endourology, May 2009, vol. 23 (5), pp. 793-802. |
Reddy V.Y., et al., “P1-53: Porcine Pulmonary Vein Ablation Using a Novel Robotic Catheter Control System and Real-time Integration of CT Imaging with Electroanatomical Mapping”, 2005, p. S121. |
Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark, To: Mail Stop 8, Director of USPTO, Alexandria, VA, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 3, 2018, 2 pages. |
Rosenberg J.M., Artificial Intelligence & Robotics, 1986, 3 pages. |
Rule 7.1.1 Certificate, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-01359-MN, Document 117-2, Oct. 30, 2019, 2 pages. |
Scheduling Order, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, C.A. No. 18-1359-MN, Document 42, 2019, 17 pages. |
Shang, J. et al., “An Articulated Universal Joint Based Flexible Access Robot for Minimally Invasive Surgery,” 2011 IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), May 9-13, 2011, London, UK, pp. 1147-1152. |
Shaw Keller LLP, Letter Proposed Scheduling Order, By CM/ECF & Hand Delivery, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 39, Feb. 28, 2019, 1 page. |
Shaw Keller LLP, Letter to Request Scheduling of a Discovery Teleconference, By CM/ECF & Hand Delivery, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 20, Nov. 8, 2018, 1 page. |
Shaw Keller LLP, Letter, Karen E. Keller, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Intuitive Surgical, Inc., et al. v. Auris Health, Inc., Document 23, By CM/ECF & Hand Delivery, Dec. 3, 2018, 4 pages. |
Shaw Keller LLP, Letter, Written to Advise the Court that Auris has “Entered into a Definitive Agreement”, By CM/ECF & Hand Delivery, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 36, Feb. 20, 2019, 1 page. |
Sheila Weller, He Helped Pioneer Robotic Surgery. Now He Wants to Reinvent Lung Cancer Care, JNJ.com, Apr. 2019, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 114-2, Retrived from the internet : [https://www.jnj.com/personal-stories/why-robotic-surgery-pioneer-frederic-moll-is-now-tackling-lung-cancer-care], 6 pages. |
Slepian M.J., “Robotic Catheter Intervention: The Hansen Medical Sensei™ Robotic Catheter System,” 2010, 28 pages. |
Stieber, Michael E. et al., “Vision-Based Sensing and Control for Space Robotics Applications,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Aug. 1999, vol. 48, No. 4, pp. 807-812. |
Sturges R.H. Jr., et al., “A Voice-Actuated, Tendon-Controlled Device for Endoscopy”, 1996, pp. 603-617. |
Sturges, Robert H. et al., “A Flexible, Tendon-Controlled Device for Endoscopy,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, 1993, vol. 12(2), pp. 121-131. |
Super Dimension, “How it Works”, 2005, 2 pages, retrieved from the internet [URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20070510094239/http://www.superdimension.com/new_resources.html]. |
Super Dimension,“Overview”, 2005, 2 pages, retrieved from the internet [URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20070510094239/http://www.superdimension.com/new_resources.html]. |
Super Dimension,“System Elements”, 2005, 2 pages, retrieved from the internet [URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20070510094239/http://www.superdimension.com/new_resources.html]. |
Supplemental Briefing Regarding Claim Construction Arguments and Rulings in Parallel District Court Action of U.S. Pat. No. 9,452,276, Review No. IPR2019-01496 dated Dec. 13, 2019, 5 pages. |
Szewczyk, Jerome et al., “An active tubular polyarticulated micro-system for flexible endoscope,” Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences. vol. 271, Experimental Robotics VII, 2000, pp. 179-188, Springer-Verlag. |
Tab 1, “Declaration of Stephen J. Blumenkranz in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer,” United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Demand for Jury Trial, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 29-1, 2018, 3 pages. |
Tab 2, “Declaration of Thomas G. Cooper in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer,” United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand for Jury Trial, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 29-2, 2018, 3 pages. |
Tab 3, “Declaration of Nicola Diolaiti in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer,” United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand for Jury Trial, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 29-3, 2018, 3 pages. |
Tab 4, “Declaration of Vincent Duindam in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer,” Demand for Jury Trial, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 29-4, Demand for Jury Trial, 2018, 3 pages. |
Tab 5,“Declaration of Carolyn M. Fenech in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer,” United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand for Jury Trial, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 29-5, 2018, 3 pages. |
Tab 6, “Declaration of Gary S. Guthart in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer,” United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand for Jury Trial, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 29-6, 2018, 3 pages. |
Tab 7, “Declaration of Catherine J. Mohr in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer,” Demand for Jury Trial, Case 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 29-7, 2018, 3 pages. |
Tab 8, “Declaration of Robert Matthew Ohline in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer,”United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand for Jury Trial, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 29-8, 2018, 3 pages. |
Tab 9, “Declaration of David J. Rosa in Support of Plaintiffs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendant Auris Health, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer,” : United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Demand for Jury Trial, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-MN, Document 29-9, 2018, 3 pages. |
The Da Vinci Surgical system, Retrieved from the internet: [http://web.archive.org/web/20080724022504/http:/www.intuitivesurgical.com/products/davinci_surgicalsystem/], 2 pages. |
Transcript Teleconference, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359(MN), Document 58, 2019, 11 pages. |
Transcript, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiffs: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc., v. Defendant: Auris Health, Inc, Case No. 18-1359-(MN), Document 83, 9 pages. |
Vertut, Jean and Phillipe Coiffet, Robot Technology: Teleoperation and Robotics Evolution and Development, English translation, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Inglewood Cliffs, NJ, USA 1986, vol. 3A, 332 pages. |
Waldman H., Dictionary of Robotics, 1985, 4 pages. |
Wang, Yi-Ping et al., “A novel long period fiber grating sensor measuring curvature and determining bend-direction simultaneously,” IEEE Sensors Journal, 2005, pp. 839-843, vol. 5—Issue: 5, IEEE. |
Webster, Robert J. III et al., “Toward Active Cannulas: Miniature Snake-Like Surgical Robots,” 2006, 7 pages. |
Wong, Allan C. L. et al., “Multiplexed fibre Fizeau interferometer and fibre Bragg grating sensor system for simultaneous measurement of quasi-static strain and temperature using discrete wavelet transform,” Measurement Science and Technology, 2006, pp. 384-392, vol. 17—Issue 2, Institute of Physics Publishing. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200254223 A1 | Aug 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15257387 | Sep 2016 | US |
Child | 16863067 | US | |
Parent | 13274208 | Oct 2011 | US |
Child | 15257387 | US |