Patent Application
20070292440
The invention relates generally to the suppression of unwanted immune responses, particularly of counter-adaptive T-lymphocyte mediated immune responses. The invention relates in particular to the prevention, treatment, suppression or reversal of immune-system driven rejection of grafted tissue or a grafted organ in a recipient host.
Organ transplantation between genetically non-identical individuals invariably results in immunological rejection of the organ through T cell dependent mechanisms, unless the rejection process is bridled by administering drugs that suppress T cell function. Several U.S. patents disclose the use of such immunosuppressant drugs for inhibiting graft rejection, including U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,104,858; 5,008,246; and, 5,068,323. Other conventional agents are described in Suthanthiran et al. (1994), 331 New Eng. Med. J. 365-376. Both calcineurin phosphatase inhibitors and glucocorticosteroids are used clinically, and both prevent the T cell mediated release of activating cytokines, particularly IL-2. However, therapy with these types of conventional agents remains imperfect. Both types act by impairing signalling through the T cell antigen receptor (TCR), the sole mediator of T cell antigen specificity, and act on all T cells indiscriminately. In addition, the effect of these drugs is not lasting, such that cessation of treatment generally results in graft loss. Thus, in order to maintain viable, functional integration of the graft, transplant recipients must suffer the consequences of long-term, non-specific immunosuppresion. These consequences include an increased risk of infection and malignancy, as well as toxicity, particularly to sensitive organs or tissues, such as the kidney, liver and pancreas.
Islet cell transplantation (ICT) can result in the reversal of hyperglycemia and normalization of metabolic control of blood glucose (Ricordi, Diabetes Reviews 4:356-369, 1996; Scharp et al., Diabetes 39:515-518, 1990; Socci et al., Acta Diabetot 28:151-157, 1991; Warnock et al, Diabetologia 34:55-58, 1991; Ricordi et al., Transplantation 53:407-414, 1992; Gores et al., Lancet 341:19-21, 1993; Alejandro et al., Diabetes 46:1983-1989, 1997; in individuals afflicted with diabetes mellitus (DM). Even in the absence of insulin independence, administration of reduced dosages of exogenous insulin in transplant recipients with functioning islet allografts (basal c-peptide production >1.0 ng/mL) results in excellent metabolic control and normalization of hemoglobin Alc (HbAIc) (Ricordi. Diabetes Reviews 4:356-369, 1996; Scharp et al., Diabetes 39:515-518, 1990; Socci et al., Acta Diabetot 28:151-157, 1991; Warnock et al., Diabetologia 34:55-58, 1991; Ricordi et al., Transplantation 53:407-414, 1992; Gores et al., Lancet 341:19-21, 1993; Alejandro et al., Diabetes 46:1983-1989, 1997). Hypoglycemia has not been observed, and functioning islet allografts in recipients with autoimmune diabetes have now been documented at over 6 years post-transplant (Alejandro et al., Diabetes 46:1983-1989, 1997). Despite these significant advances, broad based application of islet cell transplantation to control DM has been limited by the requirement for chronic, generalized immunosuppression of the recipient. This limitation is related not only to the risks associated with chronic immunosuppression, but also to the diabetogenic effects of the immunosuppressive drugs currently used.
These limitations of current therapies to control DM have stimulated widespread interest in developing therapies for the induction of donor-specific immunological tolerance, thus obviating the need for life-long immunosuppression of graft recipients. Promising initial results have been obtained by several investigators, using a variety of rodent model systems for allotransplantation. When tested in large-animal preclinical models (e.g., canine, non-human primate), however, the rodent results have been found to be poorly predictive of the results of ICT in models more closely mimetic of human ICT.
There is accordingly a need for improved or more effective immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory treatments for graft recipients, including humans. In particular, there is a need for treatments that do not require pan-T cell immunosuppression, i.e., treatments that do not leave the recipient vulnerable to malignancies or opportunistic infection. More pointedly, there is a need for treatments that have lesser toxicity than currently available therapeutic agents. Similarly, there is a need for treatments that promote lasting functional integration of the graft, i.e., integration that persists beyond termination of the course of treatment.
It is an object of this invention to provide an immunomodulatory agent that mitigates counter-adaptive T cell responses without the need for pan-T cell immunosuppression. Another object is to provide an immunomodulatory agent that promotes functional integration of a tissue graft, particularly a pancreatic islet-derived tissue graft, in a recipient host, particularly a human host. Another object is to provide an immunomodulatory agent that inhibits immunological rejection of grafted tissue, particularly of grafted pancreatic islets or other insulin-producing tissue. A further object is to provide an immunomodulatory agent that interrupts delivery of a costimulatory signal to activated T cells. A particular object is to provide a CD40:CD154 binding interrupter, such as a CD154 blocking agent, for use in therapy, particularly for use in therapy to mitigate, delay or reverse immunological rejection of grafted tissue. A more general object of the invention is to improve the availability of tissue grafts, particularly insulin-producing tissue grafts, by providing immunomodulatory compositions that allow functional integration of non-autologous tissue (e.g., allogeneic or xenogeneic tissue) into a recipient host. A further general object is to prevent, mitigate, attenuate or treat diabetes mellitus (DM).
The present invention rests on the discovery that use of a CD40:CD154 binding interruptor, such as a CD154 blocking agent, whether used alone or in combination with another therapeutic agent, such as an immunomodulatory agent or a tolerizing agent, attenuates, suppresses, prevents, delays or reverses counter-adaptive immune system rejection of grafted insulin-producing tissue in a recipient host, without the need for pan-suppression of the recipient's immune system.
The invention accordingly provides methods and compositions for immunomodulatory therapy for recipients of grafted, insulin-producing tissue. A first method inhibits rejection of an insulin-producing tissue graft by a graft recipient. A second method prolongs survival of the tissue graft. A third method reverses rejection of the tissue graft. A fourth method preserves function of the tissue graft. A fifth method restores function of an impaired graft. A sixth method induces immunological tolerance to the tissue graft. All of the foregoing methods involve treating the graft recipient with a CD40:CD154 binding interruptor, by which is meant any agent that interrupts the binding of CD40 Ligand (i.e., CD40L, also known as CD154 or the 5c8 antigen, and sometimes referred to in the art as gp39) to its counter or cognate receptor (here, CD40). Preferably, the binding interruptor is a CD154 (CD40L) blocking agent, by which is meant any agent that binds to CD154 and prevents or interferes with its binding to counter receptors (e.g., CD40). An exemplary CD154 blocking agent is a monoclonal antibody (MAb), particularly one having the antigen-specific binding characteristics of the 5c8 MAb disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,474,771, the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The foregoing methods can be practiced with all types of insulin-producing tissue grafts, such as whole pancreatic tissue or pancreatic islets isolated by conventional techniques. Thus, the invention is suitable for use where the graft recipient (recipient host) is a mammal, preferably a primate, most preferably a human. In particular, the invention is suitable for use where the graft recipient is afflicted with, or at risk of, an impairment of metabolic control of glucose metabolism, such as DM. The graft donor can be a non-syngeneic member of the same phylogenetic species as the graft recipient (i.e., an allogeneic donor, providing allograft tissue), or a member of a distinct phylogenetic species (i.e., a xenogeneic donor, providing xenograft tissue). If a xenogeneic donor is used as the graft tissue source, preferably the donor is relatively MHC-compatible with the recipient host; for example, a baboon or chimpanzee would be preferred as a donor for grafting tissue into a human. The invention can be used to promote engraftment of other types of insulin-producing tissue, including cell populations of isolated adult or fetal islet β cells, or cultured islet β cells (whether derived from a primary cell culture or an immortalized cell line). Indeed, the invention can be used to promote engraftment of any cell inducibly or stably expressing an insulin gene, such as an engineered or host cell produced by conventional genetic engineering techniques. Optionally, the insulin-producing tissue can be physically separated from tissues of the recipient by an immunoisolation device.
In view of the foregoing, it should be clear that the invention provides a method of restoring metabolic control of glucose metabolism in a mammal in need thereof. This method involves implanting insulin producing tissue into the mammal, and treating the mammal with a CD40:CD154 binding interrupter, preferably with a CD154 blocking agent. In preferred embodiments, the CD154 blocking agent is a monoclonal antibody having the antigen-specific binding properties of MAb 5c8. In an exemplary protocol, which has been validated by testing in relevant large-animal preclinical models of human DM, engraftment is induced by administration of the MAb prior to ICT, followed (preferably) by at least two administrations of the MAb within a two-week period following ICT (i.e., following implantation of insulin-producing tissue). Thereafter, as desired, engraftment is maintained by administration of the MAb one month (defined as four weeks) after ICT. The maintenance can be repeated as necessary or as deemed prudent.
Optionally, engraftment can be enhanced by concurrently treating the mammal with a tolerizing agent, by which is meant any agent that preserves engraftment beyond the cessation of immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive therapy. An exemplary tolerizing agent comprises bone marrow tissue, or a population of bone marrow derived cells, that are MHC-compatible with the tissue graft (here, with the insulin-producing tissue). Preferably, the bone marrow or cells are syngeneic with the donor or source of insulin-producing tissue. Long-term survival of the tolerizing agent in the graft recipient accordingly renders the recipient immunologically chimeric, a state manifested by donor-specific immunological tolerance. Populations of marrow-derived, CD34(+) hematopoeitic cells (stem cells) are particularly preferred as tolerizing agents. Especially preferred are populations of stem cells having a CD40(−) cell surface phenotype.
In another aspect, the invention provides a method of detecting an impairment of metabolic control of glucose metabolism in a mammal. This method is sufficiently sensitive to reveal subclinical (e.g., cryptic or asymptomatic) impairment of blood glucose metabolism, for example where the mammal is at risk of developing DM or is at risk of or in the early stages of rejecting engrafted insulin-producing tissue. The method involves assessing glucose content of a sample comprising blood, withdrawn from the mammal at least one hour and less than six hours (preferably, about two hours) after the mammal has ingested food. The mammal is considered to have impaired glucose metabolism if the glucose content of this postprandial (PPD) sample is found to be 150 mg/dl or higher (i.e., to exceed about 150 mg/dl). Reliability of the method is improved if two such samples, withdrawn on consecutive days, are assessed and both reveal glucose contents of 150 mg/dl or higher.
The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention, as well as the invention itself, will be more fully understood from the following description of preferred embodiments, when read together with the accompanying drawings, in which:
T cell activation, and immunological processes dependent thereon, requires both T cell receptor (TCR) mediated signals and simultaneously delivered costimulatory signals. An important costimulatory signal is delivered by the ligation of CD40 on an antigen-presenting cell, such as a B cell, by CD40L (CD154) on a T cell. Human CD40 is a 50 kD cell surface protein expressed on mature B cells, as well as on macrophages and activated endothelial cells. CD40 belongs to a class of receptors involved in programmed cell death, including Fas/CD95 and the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha receptor. Human CD154 (CD40L) is a 32 kD type II membrane glycoprotein with homology to TNF alpha that is transiently expressed, transiently, primarily on activated T cells. CD40:CD154 binding has been shown to be required for all T cell-dependent antibody responses. In particular, CD40:CD154 binding provides anti-apoptotic and/or lymphokine stimulatory signals.
The importance of CD40:CD154 binding in promoting T cell dependent biological responses was more fully appreciated when it was discovered that X-linked hyper-IgM syndrome (X-HIGM) in humans is the phenotype resulting from genetic lack of functional CD154. Affected individuals have normal or high IgM levels, but fail to produce IgG, IgA or IgE antibodies, and suffer from recurrent, sometimes severe, bacterial and parasitic infections, as well as an increased incidence of lymphomas and abdominal cancers. A similar phenotype is observed in non-human animals rendered nullizygous for the gene encoding CD154 (knockout animals). B cells of CD154 nullizygotes can produce IgM in the absence of CD40L:CD154 binding, but are unable to undergo isotype switching, or to survive normally after affinity maturation. Histologically, lymph node germinal centers fail to develop properly, and memory B cells are absent or poorly developed. Functionally, these defects contribute to a severe reduction or absence of a secondary (mature) antibody response. Defects in cellular immunity are also observed, manifested by an increased incidence of bacterial and parasitic infections. Many of these cell-mediated defects are reversible by administration of IL-12 or IFN-gamma. These observations substantiate the view that normal CD40:CD154 binding promotes the development of Type I T-helper cell immunological responses.
A number of preclinical studies have established that agents capable of interrupting CD40:CD154 binding have promise as immunomodulating agents. In particular, studies involving small-animal organ or tissue transplantation models have shown that CD40:CD154 interruptors promote survival of allogeneic grafts. In selected models, transient administration of agents interfering with T cell costimulation has resulted in the induction of indefinite graft acceptance. Interruption of CD40:CD154 binding in particular has yielded promising results, since it appears that engagement of this counter-receptor pair precedes other costimulatory signals in chronology and hierarchy (Ranheim et al., J. Exp Med 177:925-935, 1993; Roy et al., Eur J Immunol 25:596-603, 1995; Han et al., J Immunol 155:556-567, 1995; Shinde et al., J Immunol 157:2764-2768, 1996; Yang et al., Science 273:1862-1864, 1996; Grewal et al., Science 273:1864-1867-1996; Lederman et al., J Immunol 149:3817-3826, 1992.). Blockade of CD40:CD154 binding has resulted in prolongation of cardiac (Larsen et al., Transplantation 61:4-9, 1996; Larsen et al., Nature 381:434-438, 1996), cutaneous (Larsen et al., Nature 381:434-438, 1996; Markees et al., Transplantation 64:329-335, 1997) and islet allografts (Parker et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:9560-9564, 1995; Rossini et al., Cell Transplant 5:49-52) in rodents, and of allogeneic kidneys in primates (Kirk et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 194:8789-8794, 1997). It has also been demonstrated to delay-onset of autoimmune diabetes in non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice (Balasa et al., J Immunol 159:4620-4627, 1997). Lastly, it has been reported that interference with CD40:CD154 binding prevents the production of inflammatory cytokines (Dechanet et al., J Immunol 159:5640-5647, 1997; Kiener et al., J. Immunol 155:4917-4925, 1995.
CD40:CD154 blockade thus may provide potentially powerful therapies for prevention of islet allograft or xenograft failures in individuals having defective glucose metabolism, such as Type I diabetes. However, as noted above, studies in rodent model systems have correlated poorly with the outcome of testing or therapy of large animals, including humans.
Disclosed herein are studies assessing the effects of a preferred CD154 blocking agent, a humanized MAb having the antigen-specific binding properties of MAb 5c8 (Lederman et al., J. Exp. Med. 175:10911101, 1992), in large-animal preclinical models of islet allotransplantation. Specifically, the present models involve CD154 blockade monotherapy of baboons (Papio hamadryas) and other non-human primates. Results obtained from these studies strongly suggest that CD154 blockade monotherapy will promote long-term engraftment of insulin-producing tissue in humans, particularly humans afflicted with DM or a similar defect in glucose homeostasis.
The following discussion illustrates and exemplifies the variety of contexts and circumstances in which the invention can be practiced, as well as providing proof-of-principle studies involving specific embodiments of the invention.
Recipient Hosts
The invention can be used for treatment or prophylaxis of any mammalian recipient of an insulin-producing tissue graft, or any mammal in need of an insulin-producing tissue graft. Recipient hosts (also referred to as recipients or hosts) accordingly are afflicted with, or at risk of, a defect in metabolic control of blood glucose metabolism (glucose homeostasis). For example, the recipient can be hyper- or hypo-glycemic. The invention is particularly suitable for use with diabetic recipients, particularly recipients afflicted with diabetes mellitus (DM). Preferably, the recipient is a primate, more preferably a higher primate, most preferably a human. In other embodiments, the recipient may be another mammal in need of a tissue graft, particularly a mammal of commercial importance, or a companion animal or other animal of value, such as a member of an endangered species. Thus, recipient hosts also include, but are not limited to, sheep, horses, cattle, goats, pigs, dogs, cats, rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, gerbils, rats and mice.
Donor or Graft Tissue
The invention can be used with any type of insulin-producing tissue transplant or graft procedure, particularly procedures wherein the donor (graft) tissue is affected by, or at risk of, failure or rejection by the recipient host's immune system. In particular, the invention can be used in any context wherein the donor tissue is not histocompatible (MHC-compatible) with the recipient host. Thus, in addition to autologous or syngeneic donor tissue, the invention can be used with allogeneic or even xenogeneic donor tissue. The donor tissue can be derived, by conventional means, from a volunteer or other living donor, or from a cadaveric donor. Preferably, the donor is as histocompatible as practicable with the recipient host. Thus, where the recipient host is a human, autologous and allogeneic donor tissue is preferred. However, the donor tissue can be obtained from a heterologous species (in which case it is referred to as a heterograft), such as a non-human primate (e.g., a chimpanzee or a baboon), or another relatively compatible mammal (e.g., a pig).
In some embodiments, the donor tissue comprises an intact pancreas. In other embodiments, the donor tissue comprises a part, portion or biopsy of a donor pancreas. The donor pancreas can be obtained from a living donor or can be retrieved from a suitable cadaver. If a cadaveric donor is used, the pancreas is preferably exposed to cold ischemic conditions for no more than about eight hours. In still other embodiments, the donor tissue comprises insulin-producing cells, particularly isolated or suspended islets or islet cells, including cells withdrawn or excised from a fetal or adult donor, cells maintained in primary culture, or an immortalized cell line. Appropriate means for preparing donor islets or islet cell suspensions from whole pancreata are well known (see, e.g., Ricordi et al. (1988), 37 Diabetes 413-420; Tzakis et al. (1990), 336 Lancet 402-405; Linetsky et al. (1997), 46 Diabetes 1120-1123). Appropriate pancreata are obtained from donors essentially free of defects in blood glucose homeostasis. Other sources of insulin-producing cells include fetal islet progenitor cells, optionally expanded in primary culture. Any appropriate cell type can be used, however, including cells harboring exogenous genetic material encoding an expressible insulin gene. Thus, the invention encompasses the use of transfected or transformed host cells, which have been (or are derived from ancestor cells which have been) engineered to express insulin, either constitutively or inducibly (e.g., under control of a glucose-responsive promoter or enhancer). In other embodiments, the invention encompasses the use of pancreatic or other donor cell types derived from a transgenic mammal that has been engineered to include genetic material necessary for the production of insulin in some or all of its body tissues.
The insulin producing tissue (donor tissue) is introduced systemically or locally into the recipient host. For example, isolated, suspended or dispersed insulin-producing cells can be infused intravascularly, or implanted into a desired site, such as a bone marrow cavity, the liver, within the kidney capsule, intramuscularly, or intraperiotoneally. In some embodiments, the cells are mitotically competent and produce new tissue of donor origin. In other embodiments, the cells are not mitotically competent, but remain viable in the donor, and produce or express insulin. In any event, an effective amount of insulin-producing cells or tissue is implanted, by which is meant an amount sufficient to attenuate (detectably mitigate) the recipient's defect in glucose metabolism (e.g., hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia). Optimally, the amount is sufficient to restore the recipient's ability to maintain glucose homeostasis—that is, to free the recipient from dependence on conventional (e.g., injected or inhaled) insulin replacement therapy.
In some embodiments, the insulin-producing tissue is physically separated (isolated) from surrounding tissues of the recipient by an immunoisolation device. Appropriate devices protect the insulin-producing tissue from most effectors of cellular and humoral immunity, including but not limited to, leukocytes, immunoglobulin and complement. Thus, the immunoisolation device generally provides a semipermeable barrier, such as a membrane, having a pore size sufficient to prevent diffusion therethrough of molecules more massive than about 50 to 100 kD. The barrier defines an isolation chamber in which the insulin-producing tissue is disposed, and is free of any sites at which the insulin-producing tissue can physically contact cells or tissues external to the barrier. Any conventional device, envelope, capsule or microcapsule can be used, including single- or double-walled alginate microcapsules (e.g., as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,227,298, the teachings of which are incorporated by reference herein). Other conventional microcapsules include alginate polylysine microcapsules, chemically cross-linked alginate microcapsules, and capsules formed of other biocompatible polymers, formed into a structurally sound immunoisolation device of any desired shape or size (see, e.g., Jaink et al. (1996), 61 Transplantation 4, the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference).
In further embodiments, a tolerizing agent, such as bone marrow or cells derived therefrom, also is implanted into the recipient host. Any tolerogenic tissue or cell type can be used as a tolerizing agent, including pancreatic stromal cells as well as bone marrow cells. The tolerogenic cells are MHC-compatible with the insulin-producing tissue, and are preferably obtained from the donor who provided the insulin-producing tissue or are syngeneic therewith. Appropriate means for preparing bone marrow or cell populations thereof are well known (see, e.g., Sharp et al. (1984), 69 J. Immunol. Meth. 187-195, Fontes et al. (1995), in Methods in Cell Transplantation, Ricordi, ed., R.G. Landes Co., pub., pp. 619-628). Preferably, the bone marrow is processed using Ceprate® SC Stem Cell Concentration System (CellPro, Inc., Bothell, Wash.; see CellPro Investigator Brochure, rev. 06.01.97), or equivalent thereto, to provide a bone marrow derived cell population enriched in CD34(+) hematopoeitic cells. Standard fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis or immunofluorescence staining reveals that this population of CD34(+) cells is essentially free of CD40(+) cells, however some dim staining for CD40 may be observed. As the CD34(+) cell population is a dynamic stem cell population, it is believed that the presence of a low level of CD40(+) cells corresponds to the frequency at which the stem cells commence differentiation along a B cell lineage. Indeed, preliminary FACS studies have established that the only CD40(+) cells (which typically represent no more than about 0.7% of the total) in the CD34(+) stem cell population also are CD19(+). CD19 is the earliest currently known B cell lineage marker. Accordingly, to ensure use of a true stem cell population as the tolerizing agent, the CD34(+) cells can be further depleted of CD40(+) cells by conventional negative selection means (e.g., selective cytolysis, cell sorting, panning or the like).
Exemplary CD40:CD154 Binding Interruptors
Therapeutic compounds useful for practice of the invention include any compound that blocks the interaction of cell surface CD40 (e.g., on B cells) with CD40L (CD154) expressed, e.g., on the surface of activated T cells. CD40:CD154 binding interrupter compounds, such as CD154 blocking agents, that are specifically contemplated include polyclonal antibodies and monoclonal antibodies (MAbs), as well as antibody derivatives such as chimeric molecules, humanized molecules, molecules with reduced effector functions, bispecific molecules, and conjugates of antibodies. In a preferred embodiment, the antibody has the antigen-specific binding characteristics of MAb 5c8, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,474,771, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference. In a currently highly preferred embodiment, the antibody is a humanized 5c8. Other known antibodies against CD154 include antibodies ImxM90, ImxM91 and ImxM92 (obtained from Immunex), an anti-CD40L mAb commercially available from Ancell (clone 24-31, catalog #353-020, Bayport, Minn.), and an anti-CD40L mAb commercially available from Genzyme (Cambridge, Mass., catalog #80-3703-01). Also commercially available is an anti-CD40L mAb from PharMingen (San Diego, catalog #33580D). Numerous additional anti-CD40L antibodies have been produced and characterized (see, e.g., WO 96/23071 of Bristol-Myers Squibb, the specification of which is hereby incorporated by reference).
The invention also includes use of CD 154 blocking agents of other types, such as complete Fab fragments, F(ab′)2 compounds, VH regions, FV regions, single chain antibodies (see, e.g., WO 96/23071), polypeptides, fusion constructs of polypeptides, fusions of CD40 (such as CD40Ig, as in Hollenbaugh et al., J. Immunol. Meth. 188:1-7, 1995, which is hereby incorporated by reference), and small molecule compounds such as small semi-peptidic compounds or non-peptide compounds, all capable of blocking or interrupting CD40:CD154 binding. Procedures for designing, screening and optimizing small molecules are provided in PCT/US96/10664, filed Jun. 21, 1996, the specification of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Various forms of antibodies also can be produced using standard recombinant DNA techniques (Winter and Milstein, Nature 349: 293-99, 1991). For example, “chimeric” antibodies may be constructed, in which the antigen binding domain from an animal antibody is linked to a human constant domain (an antibody derived initially from a nonhuman mammal in which recombinant DNA technology has been used to replace all or part of the hinge and constant regions of the heavy chain and/or the constant region of the light chain, with corresponding regions from a human immunoglobin light chain or heavy chain) (see, e.g., Cabilly et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,816,567; Morrison et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 81: 6851-55, 1984). Chimeric antibodies reduce the immunogenic responses elicited by animal antibodies when used for human therapy or prophylaxis.
In addition, recombinant “humanized” antibodies can be synthesized. Humanized antibodies are antibodies initially derived from a nonhuman mammal in which recombinant DNA technology has been used to substitute some or all of the amino acids not required for antigen binding with amino acids from corresponding regions of a human immunoglobin light or heavy chain. That is, they are chimeras comprising mostly human immunoglobulin sequences into which the regions responsible for specific antigen-binding have been inserted (see, e.g., PCT patent application WO 94/04679). Animals are immunized with the desired antigen, the corresponding antibodies are isolated and the portion of the variable region sequences responsible for specific antigen binding are removed. The animal-derived antigen binding regions are then cloned into the appropriate position of the human antibody genes in which the antigen binding regions have been deleted. Humanized antibodies minimize the use of heterologous (inter-species) sequences in antibodies for use in human therapies, and are less likely to elicit unwanted immune responses. Primatized antibodies can be produced similarly.
Another embodiment of the invention includes the use of human antibodies, which can be produced in nonhuman animals, such as transgenic animals harboring one or more human immunoglobulin transgenes. Such animals may be used as a source for splenocytes for producing hybridomas, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,569,825.
Antibody fragments and univalent antibodies also can be used in practice of this invention. Univalent antibodies comprise a heavy chain/light chain dimer bound to the Fc (or stem) region of a second heavy chain. “Fab region” refers to those portions of the chains which are roughly equivalent, or analogous, to the sequences which comprise the Y branch portions of the heavy chain and to the light chain in its entirety, and which collectively (in aggregates) have been shown to exhibit antibody activity. A Fab protein includes aggregates of one heavy and one light chain (commonly known as Fab′), as well as tetramers which correspond to the two branch segments of the antibody Y, (commonly known as F(ab)2), whether any of the above are covalently or non-covalently aggregated, so long as the aggregation is capable of selectively reacting with a particular antigen or antigen family.
In addition, standard recombinant DNA techniques can be used to alter the binding affinities of recombinant antibodies with their antigens by altering amino acid residues in the vicinity of the antigen binding sites. The antigen binding affinity of a humanized antibody may be increased by mutagenesis based on molecular modeling (Queen et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 86:10029-33, 1989; PCT patent application WO 94/04679). It may be desirable to increase or to decrease the affinity of the antibodies for CD40L, depending on the targeted tissue type or the particular treatment schedule envisioned. This may be done utilizing phage display technology (see, e.g., Winter et al., Ann. Rev. Immunol. 12:433-455, 1994; and Schier et al., J. Mol. Biol. 255:28-43, 1996, which are hereby incorporated by reference). For example, it may be advantageous to treat a patient with constant levels of antibodies with reduced affinity for CD40L for semi-prophylactic treatments. Likewise, antibodies with increased affinity for CD40L may be advantageous for short-term treatments.
Routes of Administration
The CD40:CD154 binding interrupters, including CD154 blocking agents, used in the invention can be administered in any manner which is medically acceptable. Depending on the specific circumstances, local or systemic administration may be desirable. Preferably, the agent is administered via a parenteral route such as by an intravenous, intraarterial, subcutaneous, intramuscular, intraorbital, intraventricular, intraperitoneal, subcapsular, intracranial, intraspinal, or intranasal injection, infusion or inhalation. The agent also can be administered by implantation of an infusion pump, or a biocompatible or bioerodable sustained release implant, into the recipient host, either before or after implantation of donor tissue. Alternatively, certain compounds of the invention, or formulations thereof, may be appropriate for oral or enteral administration. Still other compounds of the invention will be suitable for topical administration.
In further embodiments, the CD40:CD154 binding interrupter is provided indirectly to the recipient, by administration of a vector or other expressible genetic material encoding the interrupter. The genetic material is internalized and expressed in cells or tissue of the recipient, thereby producing the interrupter in situ. For example, a suitable nucleic acid construct would comprise sequence encoding one or more of the MAb 5c8 immunoglobulin (Ig) chains as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,474,771. Other suitable constructs would comprise sequences encoding chimeric or humanized versions of the MAb 5c8 Ig chains or antigen-binding fragments thereof. Still other suitable constructs would comprise sequences encoding part or all of other CD154-specific MAbs. The construct is delivered systemically or locally, e.g., to a site vicinal to the site of implantation of insulin-expressing tissue.
Alternatively, the vector or other genetic material encoding the interrupter is internalized within a suitable population of isolated cells to produce interuptor-producing host cells. These host cells then are implanted or infused into the recipient, either locally or systemically, to provide in situ production of the CD40:CD154 binding interrupter. Appropriate host cells include cultured cells, such as immortalized cells, as well as cells obtained from the recipient (e.g., peripheral blood or lymph node cells, such as natural killer (NK) cells).
In general, compounds of the invention are administered to the recipient host. However, the compounds also can be administered to the donor, or to the donor tissue. For example, a compound of the invention can be included in a perfusion or preservative fluid in which the donor tissue is stored or transported prior to its integration into the recipient host.
Formulation
In general, the compound(s) used in practice of the invention are suspended, dissolved or dispersed in a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or excipient. The resulting therapeutic composition does not adversely affect the recipient's homeostasis, particularly electrolyte balance. Thus, an exemplary carrier comprises normal physiologic saline (0.15M NaCl, pH 7.0 to 7.4). Other acceptable carriers are well known in the art and are described, for example, in Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, Gennaro, ed., Mack Publishing Co., 1990. Acceptable carriers can include biocompatible, inert or bioabsorbable salts, buffering agents, oligo- or polysaccharides, polymers, viscosity-improving agents, preservatives, and the like.
Any CD40:CD154 binding interrupter, such as a CD154 blocking agent, that is used in practice of the invention is formulated to deliver a pharmaceutically-effective or therapeutically-effective amount or dose, which is an amount sufficient to produce a detectable, preferably medically beneficial effect on the recipient. Medically beneficial effects would include preventing, delaying or attenuating deterioration of, or detectably improving, the recipient's medical condition. As an example, renal function and health of a kidney allograft or xenograft can be monitored by routinely measuring the concentrations of blood urea nitrogen or creatinine, or the volume or solute contents of urine, or the rate of clearance of relevant solutes from the blood into the urine. Similarly, glucoregulatory function and health of insulin-producing allograft or xenograft can be monitored by routinely measuring the concentrations of blood or urine glucose, glucose metabolites, or insulin, or measuring insulin response to glucose challenge, e.g., in a conventional glucose tolerance test. Thus, an effective amount of a therapeutic compound of the invention, such as a CD154 blocking agent, is any amount which detectably decreases the recipient's dependence on insulin replacement therapy. An optimal effective amount is one which substantially frees the recipient of dependence on exogenous insulin. More specifically, an effective amount is one which induces partial or substantially complete engraftment (acceptance and function) of donor insulin-producing tissue.
Dosages and Frequency of Treatment
The amount of and frequency of dosing for any particular compound to be used in practice of the invention is within the skills and clinical judgement of ordinary practitioners of the tissue transplant arts, such as transplant surgeons. The general dosage and administration regime is established by preclinical and clinical trials, which involve extensive but routine studies to determine effective, e.g., optimal, administration parameters for the desired compound. Even after such recommendations are made, the practitioner will often vary these dosages for different recipient hosts based on a variety of considerations, such as the recipient's age, medical status, weight, sex, and concurrent treatment with other pharmaceuticals. Determining effective dosage and administration regime for each CD40:CD154 binding interruptor used to inhibit graft rejection is a routine matter for those of skill in the pharmaceutical and medical arts. The dosage amount and timecourse of should be sufficient to produce a clinically beneficial change in one or more indicia of the recipient's health status. Exemplary timecourse and dosage regimes are set forth in the proof-of-principle studies included herein. Essentially, the invention involves administration of a CD40:CD 154 binding interrupter (exemplified by a humanized MAb 5c8, hu5c8) in an acceptance-inducing regime, followed if deemed prudent by an acceptance-maintaining regime.
To exemplify dosing considerations for an anti-CD40L compound, the following examples of administration strategies are given for an anti-CD40L mAb. The dosing amounts could easily be adjusted for other types of anti-CD40L compounds. In general, single dosages of between about 0.05 and about 50 mg/kg patient body weight are contemplated, with dosages most frequently in the 1-20 mg/kg range. For acute treatment, such as before or at the time of transplantation, or in response to any evidence that graft rejection is beginning, an effective dose of antibodies ranges from about 1 mg/kg body weight to about 20 mg/kg body weight, administered daily for a period of about 1 to 5 days, preferably by bolus intravenous administration. The same dosage and dosing schedule may be used in the load phase of a load-maintenance regimen, with the maintenance phase involving intravenous or intramuscular administration of antibodies in a range of about 0.1 mg/kg body weight to about 20 mg/kg body weight, for a treatment period of anywhere from weekly to 3 month intervals. Chronic treatment may also be carried out by a maintenance regimen, in which antibodies are administered by intravenous or intramuscular route, in a range of about 0.1 mg/kg body weight to about 20 mg/kg body weight, with interdose intervals ranging from about 1 week to about 3 months. In addition, chronic treatment may be effected by an intermittent bolus intravenous regimen, in which between about 1.0 mg/kg body weight and about 100 mg/kg body weight of antibodies are administered, with the interval between successive treatments being from 1 to 6 months. For all except the intermittent bolus regimen, administration may also be by oral, pulmonary, nasal or subcutaneous routes.
If desired, the effectiveness of the antibodies can be increased by administration serially or in combination with conventional anti-rejection therapeutic agents or drugs such as, for example, corticosteroids or immunosuppressants. Alternatively, the antibodies may be conjugated to a conventional agent. This advantageously permits the administration of the conventional agent in an amount less than the conventional dosage, for example, less than about 50% of the conventional dosage, when the agent is administered as monotherapy. Accordingly, the occurrence of many side effects associated with that agent should be avoided.
Combination therapies according to this invention for treatment of graft rejection include the use of anti-CD40L antibodies together with agents targeted at B cells, such as anti-CD19, anti-CD28 or anti-CD20 antibody (unconjugated or radiolabeled), IL-14 antagonists, LJP394 (LaJolla Pharmaceuticals receptor blocker), IR-1116 (Takeda small molecule) and anti-Ig idiotype monoclonal antibodies. Alternatively, the combinations may include T cell/B cell targeted agents, such as CTLA4Ig, IL-2 antagonists, IL-4 antagonists, IL-6 antagonists, receptor antagonists, anti-CD80/CD86 monoclonal antibodies, TNF, LFA1/ICAM antagonists, VLA4/VCAM antagonists, brequinar and IL-2 toxin conjugates (e.g., DAB), prednisone, anti-CD3 MAb (OKT3), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), cyclophosphamide, and other immunosuppressants such as calcineurin signal blockers, including without limitation, tacrolimus (FK506). Combinations may also include T cell targeted agents, such as CD4 antagonists, CD2 antagonists and IL-12.
For maintenance of graft integration, or in a period following suppression of an acute episode of graft rejection, a maintenance dose of anti-CD40L antibodies, alone or in combination with a conventional anti-rejection agent is administered, if necessary. Subsequently, the dosage or the frequency of administration, or both, may be reduced. Where no sign of graft rejection is evident, treatment might cease, with vigilant monitoring for signs of graft rejection. In other instances, as determined by the ordinarily skilled practitioner, occasional treatment might be administered, for example at intervals of four weeks or more. Recipient hosts may, however, require intermittent treatment on a long-term basis upon any recurrence of disease symptoms.
Pre-Clinical Model Systems for Evaluating CD40:CD154 Interruptor Treatment Regimes
Preferred, exemplary model systems for testing efficacy of a CD40:CD154 interrupting compound (e.g., an anti-CD40L compound or a CD154 blocking agent, such as a MAb having the specificity of MAb 5c8) are the primate (baboon and/or rhesus monkey) islet allograft models disclosed in prior related U.S. Provisional Ser. No. 60/050,267 (Jun. 20, 1997), the teachings of which are incorporated by reference herein. Such primate models have been shown to be rigorous tests of immune manipulation: they are exquisitely sensitive to even minor changes in allograft function or adverse effects on recipient wound healing and immune system function. In addition, the models have obvious biological similarity to human renal transplantation. Specifically, genes that encode MHC proteins are well conserved between humans and the primates used as basis for the models, and the primates' rejection of vascularized organs closely parallels that seen in clinical settings.
Baboon Model of ICT for Pancreatectomy-Induced Diabetes.
Identification of donor-recipient pairs. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from 10 potential recipients (Baboons, Papio hamadryas, male and female, 1-2 years of age, approximately 4.0 kg) from the Mannheimer facility (Homestead, Fla.) were used as responders against PBMC from 11 male donors (over 2 years of age, purchased from the Southwest Foundation in Texas) in a one way mixed leukocyte culture (MLC). The baboon MLC was performed via standardized methods for human MLC. With respect to low background and high specific reactivity, utilization of medium supplemented with human serum yielded superior results, as compared to media with baboon or fetal calf serum. The donors were of a sufficient size that enough islets and bone marrow were obtained from 1 donor to allow for transplantation into 2 recipients. In contrast to the modest MLC responses observed when PBMC from animals at Mannheimer were used as MLC responders and stimulators, the MLC reactivity between these animals was excellent, with all potential recipients yielding stimulation indices (S.I.) of ≧10.0 against the stimulators (donors, backgrounds <200-300 counts per minute, cpm). An attempt was made to choose two recipients with similar MLC reactivity to the designated donor, and donor-recipient pairs with varying degrees of alloreactivity were chosen. An MLC S.I. of >10 was considered very reactive and was chosen as the minimal acceptable disparity; as a comparison, when animals from Mannheimer were used as donors and recipients, the MLC S.I, were usually less than 5.
Islet/bone marrow preparation and administration. Islets were separated from the pancreas one day prior to ICT (i.e., on study day −1) by minor modifications of the automated method for human islet isolation (Ricordi et al., Diabetes 37-413-420, 1988; Selvaggi et al., Transplant. Proc. 29: 1967-1968, 1997) using Liberase® (0.47 mg/ml collagenase solution, obtained from Boehringer-Mannheim, Indianapolis, Ind.). Cold ischemia time of the pancreata averaged 0.5±0.1 hours. The islets were enriched in a three-layer discontinuous Euroficoll gradient (1.108, 1.096, 1.037), in which the digested pancreatic tissue was bottom-loaded with the 1.108 layer. A cell separator (COBE 299 1, COBE, Lakewood, Colo.) was used for centrifugation of the gradients (Robertson, Chadwick, Contractor, James, London. Acta Diabetologica 30: 93-98, 1993). The number, volume, and purity of islets obtained was determined as follows: the final islet preparation was suspended in 250 ml RPMI 1640 solution, three 100 ul samples were stained with dithizone (Latif et al., Transplantation 45: 827-830, 1988) and counted to assess total islet yield, and the data was mathematically converted to determine the total number of islets with an average-diameter of 150 pm (islet equivalent; IEQ) (Ricordi et al., Acta Diabetol. Lat. 27: 185-195, 1990).
For studies on enhancing tolerance, vertebral body was harvested from the pancreas donor and processed to obtain donor bone marrow cells (DBMC) generally according to routine modifications of methods for processing of human vertebral bodies. For recipients of donor bone marrow, infusions were administered on days 5 and II post ICT. A total dose of 109 nucleated cells per kg recipient body weight was given.
Restraint of animals. For chemical restraint, ketamine hydrochloride was injected into the gluteus muscle (10 mg/kg of body weight). Prolongation of sedation was achieved by administering ketamine HCl, i.m., at a dose of 5 mg/kg. Additional ketamine was given whenever an animal responded to a toe-pinch stimulus. Since previous studies have shown that ketamine reduces first phase insulin response to glucose (FPIR), the ketamine dose was maintained as low as possible in all metabolic tests (Lehmann et al., J. Med. Primatol. 26: 312-321, 1997). The total dose of ketamine to maintain satisfactory sedation over a period of 30 minutes was 35±2 mg/kg. Animals were physically restrained while sedated by ketamine. Surgical and vascular penetration sites were prepared using betadine and alcohol alternating scrubs. Indwelling catheters were placed intravenously and secured.
Pancreatectomy and ICT. On the day of ICT (study day 0), the islet preparation was centrifuged and the pellet was resuspended in supplemented CMRL 1066, followed by overnight culture at 22° C. Prior to transplantation, the preparation was centrifuged and the pellet was resuspended in 20 ml RPMI 1640 solution containing 2.5% donor serum and 200 NU heparin. The number of IEQ was determined immediately prior to transplantation. Total pancreatectomy was performed according to established surgical techniques. After completion of the total pancreatectomy, a 20G angiocatheter was inserted into one of the mesenteric vessel tributaries of the portal vein, and ICT was accomplished by gravity infusion of the islet preparation over a 10 min period.
Immunosuppression and post-operative care. FK506 (tacrolimus) was chosen as the immunosuppressant, as this drug is currently utilized in human ICT. FK506 administration commenced at 5 days prior to ICT. A dosage of 0.1 mg/kg/day, i.m. was administered to recipient baboons. Drug levels were monitored daily and dosage was adjusted to maintain trough levels of approximately 15 ng/ml. Humanized anti-CD 154, (derived from MAb 5c8, Lederman et al., J. Exp. Med. 175:1091-1101, 1992) was given i.v. on study days −1, 3, and 10 at a dosage of 10 or 20 mg/kg, and serum levels of 5c8 and anti-5c8 were assessed by ELISA.
For the first post-operative day (study day 1, or POD 1), the baboons were given intravenous fluids. The animals were subsequently fed a diet containing 60 g of carbohydrate per day, with 45 g of monkey biscuits (supplemented with viokase) and 15 g of fruit. Based on experience with the first two animals treated with anti-CD 154, subsequent baboons were treated with small subcutaneous insulin doses (approximately 0.5 U/kg of body weight per day), for a period of 14-20 days after islet transplantation, in order to prevent “exhaustion” of the islets, thus optimizing the conditions necessary for successful engraftment.
Monitoring. Fasting and post-prandial blood glucose (FG and PPG, respectively) were monitored via heel stick and blood testing with a Glucometer Elite, and at least once weekly, a blood sample was drawn to obtain plasma for testing of FG levels with a Beckman glucose analyzer. In general a blood sample was also obtained to confirm unusually high readings. Blood samples were drawn from all animals in the anti-CD 154 study prior to each dose of MAb (prior to day −1 and just before antibody administration on days 3 and 10) and weekly thereafter. At approximately 3 months post-transplant, testing was decreased to every other week. The blood samples were used for phenotyping of peripheral blood to assess leukocyte subsets and determination of CBC and chemistries, 5c8 and anti-5c8 levels, insulin and C-peptide levels, and chimerism. Blood was drawn periodically for retesting of MLC reactivity to donor and 3rd party antigens.
Assays. Plasma insulin was assayed by a double antibody method (Linco Research, Inc., St. Charles, Mo.). The lower limit of detection was 20 pmol/l and the average intra-assay coefficient variation was 6%. C-peptide was assayed in plasma with a lower detection limit of 6% and intra-assay coefficient of variation of 6%. Plasma glucose was measured using a glucose analyzer (Beckman Instruments, Palo Alto, Calif.). Whole blood capillary glucose levels were measured with an Elite Glucometer (Bayer, Elkhard, Ind.). Validity of the insulin assay for baboons was demonstrated by the parallelism of insulin concentrations in dilutions of serum with the insulin standard curve. Glucagon was measured using a double antibody assay (DPC, Los Angeles, Calif.). These commercial kits have been previously validated by serial dilutions (Goodner et al., Diabetes 38: 925-931, 1989).
Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Testing (IVGTT). It has been previously shown that in vivo islet-cell function tests give an accurate reflection of changes in β cell mass. (McCulloch et al., Diabetes 40: 673-679, 1991). Intravenous glucose tolerance tests were carried out after a 16- to 18-h overnight fast, as previously described (Lehmann et al., J. Med. Primatol. 26: 312-321, 1997). In brief, blood samples were collected at −10, −5, and 0 min. Then 0.5 g glucose per kg of body weight in a 50% glucose solution was injected over 20 seconds into the saphenous vein. 1.5 ml samples were collected from the contralateral femoral artery at 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 min post injection. Thus, a total of 12 blood samples were withdrawn over a 40 min period. The samples were drawn into glass tubes containing 0.05 ml 15% fluid EDTA and 0.2 ml trasylol (500 K.I.U. aprotinin/ml blood), placed on ice, and centrifuged within 10 minn. Plasma was then frozen at −80° C. and assayed later for glucose, immunoreactive insulin, and glucagon.
Statistical analysis and calculations. Results are set forth as means ±SEM. The glucose disappearance constant (Kg) was calculated from the IVGTT as the slope of the decline of the loge (In) plasma glucose between 10 and 30 min. after the glucose injection, multiplied by 100. The acute insulin response to glucose (AIRG) was calculated as the incremental area under the insulin curve (AUC) between 1-10 min after the IV glucose injection. The incremental responses (AUCGlucose, AUCInsulin) were calculated by means of the trapezoidal rule with subtraction of the basal values from 1 to 30 minutes, Data were analyzed with Statistica for Windows software (Version 5.0, 1997. Statsoft Inc., Tulsa, Okla., USA).
Results.
CD154 blockade therapy prolongs survival and function of islet allografts. All baboons became normoglycemic immediately post transplant. As shown below in Table 1, ICT of allogeneic islets, in the absence of immunosuppressive or CD154 blockade therapy, resulted in rejection at day 8. Conventional immunosuppression with FK506 (alone or in combination with whole bone marrow or stem cell selected marrow) failed to improve islet survival, with animals rejecting at days 10, 8, and 10, respectively. In striking contrast, treatment of 4 out of 5 baboons with anti-CD154 (5C8) MAb resulted in extended islet allograft survival, well beyond that of control or FK506 treated animals. Results of this study also are set forth in line graph form in
CD154 blockade therapy can be applied in conjunction with bone marrow cell transfer. Three baboons received delayed infusions of whole bone marrow (n=2) or stem cell selected marrow (selected over a Ceprate® column, CellPro, Bothell, Wash.) (n=1) on PODs 5 and 11. These baboons were given 5C8 induction therapy (20 mg/kg days −1, 3, and 10) and then placed on monthly maintenance therapy, starting at POD 28. One animal did extremely well, remaining free of rejection until POD 241. A second animal experienced rejection on POD 112, was treated for rejection and maintained until POD 162. The third animal was treated for rejection on day 70 and maintained till POD 124.
Effect of CD 154 blockade therapy on graft function, including control of glucose metabolism. Repeated IVGTTs in the control animals showed an excellent reproducibility of first phase insulin secretion (FPIS). In particular, one glucose tolerance test (IPGTT) and immunohistochemistry performed in an animal euthanized on day 79, revealed functioning graft tissue in the liver, with no residual insulin production from extrahepatic sites. Other animals in the study were found to have functioning islet allografts, with graft survivals ranging between >125 and >220 days. Repeated IVGTTs 4 to 16 weeks after pancreatectomy and islet transplantation showed almost identical Kg values in all animals, for up to 8 postoperative weeks. Kg values did decline thereafter in baboons treated with hu5c8 at the time of rejection. Stable values were observed in baboons treated with maintenance doses of hu5c8. Islet mass, as estimated by FPIS, was reduced with each rejection episode over time. In contrast, FPIS (follow-up 16 weeks) after islet transplantation for animals on hu5c8 maintenance therapy was well preserved. Two control animals were also studied. In some of the IVGTT, technical problems prompted administration of more ketamine than in the previous study, which resulted in a reduced Kg value and FPIR. However, on follow-up with the standard dose of ketamine, these indices were back to normal.
During the course of the present studies, it was discovered that graft rejection could be detected prior to elevation of FG by assessing the 2 hour PPG. Historically, islet graft rejection has been defined as two consecutive FGs greater than 250 mg/dl. It now has been discovered, however, that two consecutive 2 hour PPG greater than 150 mg/dl provides a sensitive index of the early stages of graft rejection. Application of antirejection therapy, whether with a CD154 blocker or a conventional antirejection agent, thus can be applied sufficiently early in the rejection process to permit rescue of metabolically viable graft tissue. For rescue of rejecting grafts by hu5c8, the same dosage regimen used to induce graft acceptance was repeated.
Conclusions from baboon studies. The foregoing studies demonstrate that hu5c8 promotes islet engraftment, allows long-term survival of allogeneic islets, and has no adverse effect on either insulin secretion or overall insulin sensitivity. Furthermore, these studies establish for the first time that engraftment can be maintained, and that reversal of islet rejection episodes in a large animal model is possible, with CD154 blockade therapy. The therapies described herein thus can result in preservation insulin secretion and overall insulin sensitivity at pre-ICT levels in large animals.
areceived a reduced dose of 5c8
bAnimal 34R; sacrificed on POD 79 with partial function, having experienced a rejection episode at POD 58, which was successfully reversed
cAnimal 12R; sacrificed on POD 302 with partial function, having experienced six successfully treated episodes of rejection, beginning at POD 59
dAnimal 29R; sacrificed on POD 300, fully rejected, having experienced one episode of rejection
eAnimal 14R; sacrificed on POD 301 with partial function, having experienced four successfully treated episodes of rejection, beginning on POD 31
fsacrificed on POD 130, fully rejected
gsacrificed on POD 253 with partial function
hdiscussed below
idied insulin independent on POD 16 due to partial intestinal obstruction
Rhesus Monkey Model of ICT for Pancreatectomy-Induced Diabetes.
Unless specified, all procedures were generally as described above for the baboon model studies.
Animal procedures. SPF rhesus monkeys, 2-7 years of age, are readily available from COVANCE (Alice, Tex.) or the Mannheimer Foundation, Inc. (Homestead, Fla.) or similar vendors. Upon admission, all monkeys are examined to determine their general health, physical condition, and psychological status. All surgical procedures are carried under aseptic conditions. Animals are fasted for 12-18 hours before surgery and will be pre-anesthetized with i.m. ketamine (10 mg/kg) and atropine (0.04 mg/kg). Once the animal is sedated, an endotracheal tube and an i.v. catheter are promptly installed. The endotracheal tube is used to protect the airway and provide easy access for emergency drugs. The animals are anesthetized with an isoflurane and oxygen combination. Normal saline solution for injection is infused through the catheter throughout the entire ICT procedure at a rate of 10 ml/kg/hour.
A midline incision is made to gain access to the abdominal organs. For both donor and recipient animals, a total pancreatectomy is performed with preservation of the duodenum. Islets are isolated from the donor pancreas by conventional means for subsequent transplantation into pancreatectomized, diabetic monkeys. Following exsanguination of the donor under anesthesia, the vertebral bodies are removed through the abdominal incision with the aid of a Striker Saw. The bones are immediately processed to remove the marrow. In some recipients, bone marrow cells are infused into the recipient through the cephalic vein using a y-type blood set with filter.
After pancreatectomy of the recipient animals, a tributary of the inferior or superior mesentneric vein is catheterized and islets are infused via gravity drainage into the liver. Thereafter, surgical incisions are closed according to conventional surgical technique. At the end of the procedure, the animal are placed on oxygen alone and the endotracheal tube is removed when the animal sufficiently revived to control the airway. Post-ICT, recipients are placed in an ICU cage and observed until they are clinically stable. Antibiotics (Baytril) are given post-operatively (5 mg/kg i.m, q 24 hours for 5 days). Bupomorphine (0.05 mg/kg, i.m.) is used as needed as an analgesic.
Monkeys are fasted after surgery and given gatorade p.o. on POD 1. On POD2, they are started on a twice daily soft diet, consisting of banana and softened (with water) high protein monkey chow containing viokase (I banana plus 4 biscuits). Normal diet is resumed on POD 3 (6-8 biscuits plus fruit, with viokase, twice daily). Each animal is fed individually to avoid competition during feeding. Sick monkeys are hand fed to improve general health and nutrition. Critically ill animals will be treated in isolation until they are well. Monkeys which are determined to be terminal or untreatable are sacrificed by fast i.v. injection of potassium chloride through an i.v. catheter.
Monitoring. Blood sampling for the purposes of glucose and insulin monitoring, immune monitoring, etc., does not exceed 1% of body weight at any one time or 7% of body weight over a one month period. Fasting blood glucose (FG) levels are determined by using a lancet to prick the heel, to obtain a small drop of blood for placement on a glucometer strip. In certain situations, e.g., where the glucose appears high (>200 mg/dl), venipuncture is performed to obtain a plasma sample for analysis on a Beckman glucose analyzer. Blood samples are also obtained prior to and at intervals post transplant to assess recipient anti-donor immunoreactivity. Intravenous glucose tolerance testing (IVGTT) is performed as described above, pre-transplant and at 4-6 week intervals thereafter.
Results.
CD 154 blockade therapy prolongs survival and function of islet allografts in diabetic rhesus monkeys, as well as in baboons. As shown above in Table 1, the present study demonstrated that hu5c8 monotherapy prolongs islet allograft acceptance in a second non-human primate species. This study utilized the acceptance-inducing regimen of hu5c8 administration on study days −1, 0, 3 and 10. A monthly acceptance-maintaining regimen also was followed, in order to maintain serum levels of hu5c8. The results, also set forth in
The invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. The foregoing embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects illustrative of, rather than limiting on, the invention disclosed herein. Scope of the invention thus is indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description, and all changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are intended to be embraced therein.
This is a continuation-in-part of prior U.S. Provisional Ser. No. 60/050,267, filed Jun. 20, 1997, of prior U.S. Provisional Ser. No. 60/077,265, filed Mar. 9, 1998 and a continuation of prior PCT application S.N. PCT/US98/12892, filed Jun. 19, 1998. The teachings of all three earlier-filed patent applications are incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60050267 | Jun 1997 | US | |
| 60077265 | Mar 1998 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10270783 | Oct 2002 | US |
| Child | 11638244 | Dec 2006 | US |
| Parent | 09465608 | Dec 1999 | US |
| Child | 10270783 | Oct 2002 | US |
| Parent | PCT/US98/12892 | Jun 1998 | US |
| Child | 09465608 | Dec 1999 | US |
