1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to furnace equipment for use in petrochemical plants, and more particularly, to improved centrifugally-cast tubes for use in such equipment and a method and apparatus of making such tubes.
2. Description of the Related Art
It is well known that there are two basic types of furnaces used in petrochemical plants, one being “steam cracker” furnaces, and the other being “steam reformer” furnaces. Steam cracker furnaces are mainly used to make ethylene, and steam reformer furnaces are mainly used to make hydrogen. Both types of furnaces include a number of tubes, generally arranged vertically, that form a continuous flow path, or coil, through the furnace. The flow path or coil includes an inlet and an outlet. In both types of furnaces, a mixture of a hydrocarbon feedstock and steam are fed into the inlet and passed through the tubes. The tubes are exposed to extreme heat generated by burners within the furnace. As the feedstock/steam mixture is passed through the tubes at high temperatures the mixture is gradually broken down such that the resulting product exiting the outlet is ethylene in the case of a steam cracker furnace and hydrogen in the case of a steam reformer furnace.
The petrochemical industry has in the past recognized at least three desirable features in a steam cracker or steam reformer furnace. First, it is important to maximize the heat transfer rate from the furnace burners through the walls of the tubes and into the mixture of hydrocarbons and steam in order to increase the efficiency of the furnace. Second, it is important to make furnace tubes from materials that are resistant to what is known in the metallurgical arts as “creep”. Third, it is important to make furnace tubes so as to be resistant to corrosion, carburization and metal dusting.
With regard to the second important feature, “creep” is basically the gradual elongation of a metal when placed under stress and subjected to high temperatures. Various creep-resistant alloys are known to those of skill in the art. Two main methods have developed within the industry of making furnace tubes with creep-resistant alloys, one being to extrude the tube, and the other being to centrifugally cast the tube. A centrifugally-cast tube is one formed by pouring an alloy in liquid form into a tubular mold that is rotating at a high speed. The alloy is allowed to cool so as to form the centrifugally-cast tube. The internal bore of the tube is then mechanically-machined by boring to achieve the desired inner diameter, resulting in a cylindrical tube having a circular cross section with a generally constant inner and outer diameter. The industry has discovered, however, that centrifugally-cast tubes exhibit superior creep properties in comparison to extruded tubes. In particular, upon inspecting cross-sections of extruded and centrifugally-cast tubes, the industry has discovered that extruded tubes have a very fine grain metallurgical structure, whereas centrifugally-cast tubes have much larger, and columnar, grains. Further, extruded tubes have a lower carbon content when compared to the carbon content of centrifugally-cast tubes. The larger, columnar grains and higher carbon content are what give the centrifugally-cast tubes superior creep properties in comparison to the fine grain microstructure and lower carbon content of extruded tubes.
One approach to achieving two of the above-identified objectives is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,250,340 (“the '340 patent”). In particular, the '340 patent discloses a method of modifying a centrifugally-cast tube by adding a series of longitudinally-disposed fins and valleys in the typically-circular internal bore of the tube. In this manner, the internal surface area of the tube is increased, thereby increasing the heat-transfer rate therethrough. As such, the '340 patent results in a tube that is resistant to creep (since it is centrifugally cast from a creep-resistant alloy) and has an increased heat transfer rate (by virtue of its modified internal profile). A key drawback to the tube disclosed in the '340 patent, however, is that it is not resistant to corrosion, carburization or metal dusting. This is because the tube in the '340 patent is made using an electrochemical machining (ECM) method, as opposed to a mechanical machining process (e.g., the boring process traditionally used to provide the desired diameter in a centrifugally-cast tube). As is known in the art, use of the ECM method results in an electropolished surface and does not provide adequate deformation and/or orientation of the subsurface or material lattice of the inner surface of the tube. In this regard, it is well known that an electropolished surface is not resistant to corrosion, carburization or metal dusting. See, e.g., M
As such, there remains a need in the art for a centrifugally-cast tube, and method and apparatus of making same, that (1) has an increased heat-transfer rate, (2) is resistant to creep, (3) is resistant to corrosion, carburization and metal dusting, (4) has a desirable surface roughness and dimensional accuracy, and (5) is cost-efficient. The present invention has been developed to overcome the foregoing deficiencies and meet the above-described needs.
In one aspect, the present invention may be a centrifugally-cast tube comprising: a tubular body made from a creep-resistant alloy, the body having an exterior surface and an interior surface, the interior surface including a plurality of bosses and a plurality of grooves, and the plurality of bosses and grooves being mechanically machined into the interior surface. Another feature of this aspect of the invention may be that the plurality of bosses and grooves are defined by a plurality of intersecting concave and convex radii. Another feature of this aspect of the invention may be that the plurality of bosses and grooves are formed by a broaching process. Another feature of this aspect of the invention may be that the interior surface is resistant to carburization and metal dusting. Another feature of this aspect of the invention may be that the surface roughness and dimensional accuracy of the interior surface is superior to that of a centrifugally-cast tube wherein the plurality of bosses and grooves are formed by a electrochemical machining process. Another feature of this aspect of the invention may be that the plurality of bosses and grooves form a profile that is at least 5% longer than a circumference of a smallest circle that encompasses the entire resulting profile. Another feature of this aspect of the invention may be that the interior surface has a surface roughness of less than 125 RMS (CLA).
In another aspect, the present invention may include a method of improving a centrifugally-cast tube comprising: passing a first cutting tool having a plurality of first cutting inserts through a bore of the tube so as to mechanically remove a first quantity of material from the bore and to commence the formation of a plurality of grooves and bosses; passing a second cutting tool having at plurality of second cutting inserts through the bore so as to mechanically remove a second quantity of material from the bore and to continue the formation of the plurality of grooves and bosses, the plurality of second cutting inserts having dimensions different than corresponding dimensions of the plurality of first cutting inserts; and continuing to pass additional cutting tools having a plurality of additional cutting inserts through the bore so as to continue to mechanically remove additional quantities of material from the bore until a desired profile of grooves and bosses is achieved, each set of additional cutting tools having dimensions different than corresponding dimensions of the cutting inserts employed in the immediately preceding pass. Another feature of this aspect of the invention may be that the dimensions of each subsequent set of cutting tools are larger than the corresponding dimensions of the cutting tools employed in the immediately preceding pass. Another feature of this aspect of the invention may be that the dimensions incrementally increase at a rate of between 0.05 mm and 0.1 mm per pass.
In another aspect, the present invention may include a method of improving a centrifugally-cast tube comprising forming a plurality of grooves and bosses in an interior surface of the tube by mechanically deforming the interior surface. Another feature of this aspect of the invention may be that the plurality of grooves and bosses are gradually formed by passing a series of cutting tools having incrementally-differing dimensions over the interior surface.
In yet another aspect, the present invention may include an apparatus for improving a centrifugally-cast tube comprising: a first and a second guide adapted to hold the tube; a telescoping shaft adapted to pass longitudinally through a bore of the tube; and at least one cutting tool attached to the shaft and including a plurality of cutting inserts, the cutting tool being adapted to mechanically form a profile of grooves and bosses within the bore of the tube. Another feature of this aspect of the invention may be that the cutting inserts are indexable. Another feature of this aspect of the invention may be that the cutting inserts are provided with concave cutting surfaces. Another feature of this aspect of the invention may be that the cutting inserts are provided with convex cutting surfaces. Another feature of this aspect of the invention may be that the at least one cutting tool includes a plurality of cutting tools attached to the shaft, and further including at least one spacer collar disposed about the shaft and adapted to maintain the cutting tools in spaced relationship. Another feature of this aspect of the invention may be that the apparatus may further include means for lubricating the apparatus. Another feature of this aspect of the invention may be that the apparatus may further include means for attaching the at least one cutting tool to the shaft. Another feature of this aspect of the invention may be that the apparatus may further include means for attaching the at least one cutting tool to the shaft. Another feature of this aspect of the invention may be that the apparatus may further include at least one centering guide. Other features and aspects of the present invention will be explained below.
While the invention will be described in connection with the preferred embodiments, it will be understood that it is not intended to limit the invention to those embodiments. On the contrary, it is intended to cover all alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Referring to the drawings in detail, wherein like numerals denote identical elements throughout the several views, there is shown in
Each of the plurality of bosses 18 and grooves 20 is mechanically machined into the interior surface 16 so as to deform and orient the subsurface or material lattice of the interior surface 16 of the tube 10. As such, the result is a centrifugally-cast tube 10 that is resistant to corrosion, carburization and metal dusting. In addition, since the tube 10 is centrifugally cast, it is resistant to creep, and since the addition of the bosses 18 and grooves 20 result in an increased surface area of the interior surface 16 when compared to the interior surface of a tube of circular cross-section, the tube 10 also has an improved heat-transfer rate.
The present invention also includes a new method and apparatus of manufacturing the tube 10. A specific embodiment of an apparatus 22 of the present invention is shown schematically in
With reference to
The cutting tools 60 are further illustrated in
Another specific embodiment of a cutting assembly 44′ is shown in
As shown in
Referring back to
In a specific embodiment, each “roughing” pass made at a depth of 0.1 mm may be made at a speed of 12 meters/minute, and each “finishing” pass made at a depth of 0.05 mm may be made at a speed of 18 meters/minute. As explained above, as the final size of the profile is approached, the size of the incremental increases in the sizes of the support rings 62 may be lowered, for example, to less than 0.05 mm, in order to achieve a more desirable surface roughness and dimensional accuracy, and thereby result in a tube having a greater resistance to carburization and metal dusting. In actual testing, a tube of the present invention has been achieved wherein the internal surface 16 has a surface roughness of 0.8 Ra μm, which equates to 32 RMS (CLA). “RMS” means Root Mean Square and in micro inch is a United States unit for surface roughness. “CLA” means Center Line Average and in micro inch is a United Kingdom unit for surface roughness. “Ra” in micrometer is a European unit for surface roughness. The surface roughness of 32 RMS (CLA) achieved by the present invention is far superior to the surface finish of 130 RMS (CLA) reported in the '340 patent, and also to a surface roughness of 125 RMS (CLA), which is the usual surface roughness targeted in connection with finned tubes.
From the above description it should now be apparent that the present invention has a number of advantages. Use of the method and apparatus of the present invention results in a centrifugally-cast tube having a macrostructure with a large grain size and high creep properties. In addition, subsurface deformation and, orientation is achieved by the cutting passes of the hard metal (carbide) cutting inserts over the interior surface. Deformation of the primary carbides in the lattice at the interior tube surface can even be observed at high magnification.
It is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the exact details of construction, operation, exact materials or embodiments shown and described, as obvious modifications and equivalents will be apparent to one skilled in the art. For example, while the term “tube” has been used to describe the present invention, it should be understood that the present invention applies equally to any conduit of any cross-sectional geometry (e.g, square, rectangular, etc.), and is not limited to a tube of circular cross-section. In addition, while the tube 10 and related method and apparatus 22 has been illustrated and discussed in the context of a particular geometric profile (e.g, bosses 18 and grooves 20 having semi-circular profiles), the present invention is intended to cover bosses and grooves of any geometric or other profile, and is not intended to be limited to semi-circular profiles. In addition, while the present invention has been illustrated in the context of grooves and bosses that are aligned with the longitudinal axis of the tube, the present invention is also intended to cover tubes and the related method and apparatus in which the grooves and bosses are formed in a spiral or helical pattern within the tube. This may be achieved by the present invention by rotating the cutting assemblies 44 at a constant rate as they are being passed through the tube. Further, while the present invention has been explained in the context of steam reformer furnaces and steam cracker furnaces, the present invention may also be useful in other applications. For example, the present invention may be applied to heaters used in DRI (Direct Reduction of Iron) plants, which is a main area where metal dusting is observed. Accordingly, the invention is therefore to be limited only by the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2210848 | Bohle | Aug 1940 | A |
2315476 | Groene | Mar 1943 | A |
2547509 | Tozer | Apr 1951 | A |
2864591 | Frink | Dec 1958 | A |
2978797 | Ekelund | Apr 1961 | A |
3088494 | Koch et al. | May 1963 | A |
3267564 | Keyes | Aug 1966 | A |
3274978 | Palchik | Sep 1966 | A |
3600922 | Schmeling | Aug 1971 | A |
3627516 | Bellot et al. | Dec 1971 | A |
3692429 | Redding | Sep 1972 | A |
3769194 | Haggerty | Oct 1973 | A |
3776018 | French | Dec 1973 | A |
3875997 | Newson | Apr 1975 | A |
3946472 | Proulx et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
3954421 | Heuschkel | May 1976 | A |
4012829 | Dvorov et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4026779 | Shaw | May 1977 | A |
4154296 | Fijas | May 1979 | A |
4216575 | Carnavos | Aug 1980 | A |
4248179 | Bonner | Feb 1981 | A |
4274766 | Raupp et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4277207 | Proulx | Jul 1981 | A |
4342642 | Bauer | Aug 1982 | A |
4411569 | Pizzola | Oct 1983 | A |
4444589 | Sugitani et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4657074 | Tomita | Apr 1987 | A |
4690737 | Vishnitsky | Sep 1987 | A |
4729155 | Cunningham | Mar 1988 | A |
4827074 | Suwa | May 1989 | A |
4985609 | Hofele | Jan 1991 | A |
5004529 | Vishnitsky | Apr 1991 | A |
5152646 | Bauer | Oct 1992 | A |
5271809 | Holzhausen | Dec 1993 | A |
5352068 | Roseliep | Oct 1994 | A |
5388329 | Randlett | Feb 1995 | A |
5409675 | Narayanan | Apr 1995 | A |
5503506 | Yuan | Apr 1996 | A |
5628589 | Peuterbaugh | May 1997 | A |
5655599 | Kasprzyk | Aug 1997 | A |
5803165 | Shikazono | Sep 1998 | A |
5820320 | Kobari et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
6217456 | Jacob | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6250340 | Jones et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6558086 | Rigotti et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6644358 | Demarest et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
7520705 | Degesne | Apr 2009 | B2 |
20030019533 | Demarest et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030209126 | Demarest et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040079216 | Demarest et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20060056934 | Demarest et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060062646 | Demarest et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070178328 | Demarest et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20090158807 | Demarest et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090175697 | Demarest et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100215454 | Demarest et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1752709 | Jul 1971 | DE |
32 38 964 | Apr 1984 | DE |
40 07 831 | Sep 1991 | DE |
0305632 | Mar 1989 | EP |
0305799 | Mar 1989 | EP |
607894 | Jul 1994 | EP |
0668114 | Aug 1995 | EP |
889146 | Jan 1999 | EP |
0980729 | Feb 2000 | EP |
1538481 | Sep 1968 | FR |
2333870 | Jan 1979 | FR |
2687946 | Sep 1993 | FR |
969796 | Dec 1961 | GB |
954348 | Apr 1964 | GB |
1281117 | Jul 1972 | GB |
1367980 | Sep 1974 | GB |
1532851 | Nov 1978 | GB |
2021632 | Dec 1979 | GB |
2064400 | Jun 1981 | GB |
2086291 | May 1982 | GB |
2100284 | Dec 1982 | GB |
2148758 | Jun 1985 | GB |
2174945 | Nov 1986 | GB |
0812926 | Dec 1997 | GB |
1170644 | Nov 1999 | GB |
01-234126 | Aug 1983 | JP |
58-132081 | Aug 1983 | JP |
58-173022 | Oct 1983 | JP |
1790638 | Jan 1993 | RU |
716731 | Feb 1980 | SU |
1357161 | Dec 1987 | SU |
1516263 | Oct 1989 | SU |
1696197 | Jul 1991 | SU |
WO 9856872 | Dec 1998 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100275753 A1 | Nov 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09933475 | Jul 2001 | US |
Child | 10600001 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12397111 | Mar 2009 | US |
Child | 12775651 | US | |
Parent | 11690272 | Mar 2007 | US |
Child | 12397111 | US | |
Parent | 11254243 | Oct 2005 | US |
Child | 11690272 | US | |
Parent | 10600001 | Jun 2003 | US |
Child | 11254243 | US |