This application is generally related to an apparatus and method for improving the Q factor of a ceramic filter.
In the basic ceramic block filter design, the resonators are formed by typically cylindrical passages, called resonator cavities (e.g., through-holes), extending through the block from the long narrow side to the opposite long narrow side. The block is substantially plated with a conductive material (e.g., metallized) on all but one of its six (outer) sides and on the inside walls formed by the resonator cavities. One of the two opposing sides containing resonator cavity openings is not fully metallized, but instead bears a metallization pattern designed to couple input and output signals through the series of resonator cavities. This patterned side is conventionally labeled as the top of the block. In some designs, the pattern may extend to sides of the block, where input/output electrodes are formed. Ceramic filter performance is limited by electromagnetic losses due to many factors.
Filter performance may be limited by electromagnetic losses in materials used including dielectric material and materials used for conducting paths and pads. Further, geometries of shapes of different elements or portions of elements may affect the performance of a given filter. In ceramic monoblock filters, such as a recessed top pattern (RTP) technology, loss mechanisms arise from current crowding at a sharp junction between the resonator-plated through-hole (e.g., resonator cavities) and the short circuit end at the bottom of the ceramic block. What are needed in the art are methods and devices for optimizing the performance of a device by optimizing the shape of magnetic structures and dielectric sub-elements to minimize losses. Rounding, tapering, or chamfering the edges of the resonator cavities reduces the current crowding, reducing RF losses and improving power handling due to better thermal management.
In an example, a filter may include a block of dielectric material and a through-hole extending through the block from a top surface to a bottom surface of the dielectric block. The dielectric block may include a top surface, a bottom surface, and side surfaces. The through hole comprises a top edge that connects the top surface with an inner wall of the through hole and a bottom edge that connects the bottom surface with the inner wall of the through hole. The top edge or bottom edge may be rounded, chamfered, tapered, or the like.
In another example, a method of creating a filter may include providing a block of dielectric material for a filter, the block may include a top surface, a bottom surface, and a side surfaces; and creating a through-hole extending through the block from the top surface to the bottom surface. The through hole may include a top edge that connects the top surface with an inner wall of the through-hole and a bottom edge that connects the bottom surface with the inner wall of the through-hole. The top edge or bottom edge may be rounded, chamfered, tapered, or the like.
There has thus been outlined, rather broadly, certain examples of the invention in order that the detailed description thereof herein may be better understood, and in order that the present contribution to the art may be better appreciated. There are, of course, additional examples of the invention that will be described below and which will form the subject matter of the claims appended hereto.
In order to facilitate a fuller understanding of the invention, reference is now made to the accompanying drawings, in which like elements are referenced with like numerals. These drawings should not be construed as limiting the invention and intended only to be illustrative.
Disclosed herein are exemplary methods, systems, and apparatus associated with shaping structures of filters. The methods, systems, and apparatus for shaping structures of a filter may reduce RF losses and improve power handling, among other things.
As the frequency of operation of a device (e.g., monoblock filter) increases, the equivalent sizes of the series and parallel resistive elements, sometimes referred to as parasitic resistances, increase due to skin effects, current crowding, or uneven field distributions. This has the effect of lowering the Q of the device as greater valued resistive elements dissipate more energy.
Applying shaping of structures as disclosed herein lowers the values of equivalent series or parallel resistances with resultant increases in performance of the filter (monoblock filter) including improving the achievable Q for the filter.
With continued reference to
The thin plating at sharp edge 27 causes current pinching, particularly if in a high current area (e.g., short circuited area near bottom cavity entry 24) and if conductive material 25 is too thin (<3 skin depth) at RF frequencies radiation losses can occur reducing the overall Q of the resonator. SkinDepth=(2*resistivity/(2*pi*frequency*permeability)){circumflex over ( )}0.5, wherein silver is measured in micro inches. Q is defined as 2π*(total stored energy)/(Lost energy losses in one RF cycle), so decreasing lost energy increases Q. Rounding (e.g., curved like part of a circle), tapering, or chamfering sharp edges 27 reduces the current crowding, reducing RF losses, and improving power handling, which may be due to better thermal management.
With continued reference to
Alternative to rounded edges are tapered or chamfered edges of the dielectric material (and therefore the conductive material) at the entry to a resonator cavity.
For further perspective, attention is turned back with regard to some of the effects of easing the sharpness of edges, such as rounded edges 127 of
A primary source of changing the value of resistive elements is current crowding which occurs especially in areas where resistance to current flows is lowered in localized areas or in areas where the field strength, E and H, is concentrated, for example at the edges of layers, at bends, or at other areas where sharp changes in geometries of either dielectric structures of conducting paths occur. Current crowding is a nonhomogeneous distribution of current density at a given point or area.
Rounding the edges at the bottoms of resonators advantageously minimizes current crowding at the transition between the column for which the walls are plated, and the RF ground plane at the flat bottom of the filter structure. Current crowding at this transition point in conventional architecture is caused by uneven, severe field perturbations that occur at the transition point. As discussed herein, current crowding is further exacerbated at the transition point in conventional architecture designs by the non-uniformity of plating material at the transition. For example, as silver is heated it may pull into itself and away from sharp edges in a way that creates a meniscus shape.
In a further example, rounded edges on the top side of the ceramic device (e.g., the high voltage side or low current side of the filter) produces improvements on filter performance. The benefit of rounding edges of resonator structures is envisaged to be optimal where current is the greatest (e.g., on the bottom side of the device). The bottom of resonator cavity 121 may produce a short circuit where the voltage is zero and current is at a maximum.
In another example, it is advantageous for processing in manufacturing where filters are tumbled to round off edges and it may be difficult not to round off edges on both sides of a ceramic block. For plating reasons, rounding edges of both sides may provide a consistent coating at the flat-surface-face to resonator column junction. Moreover, to some of the issues disclosed herein, pressing, lapping and grinding the blocks creates a ridge around the hole and, in some instances, the plating process does not plate under the ridge. Rounding the edges of the resonator structures eliminates this problem.
Further, advantages of rounding corners on the upper and lower sides may be applicable to certain types of filters, for example, interdigital filters where resonators alternate between open and shorted resonators on each side of the block. In addition, power handling capabilities of a device can be improved as buildup of field strength is thereby minimized, thereby decreasing the likelihood or arcing.
The shaping disclosed herein may reduce the effective values and effects of resistive elements in the device. By so doing, power handling capabilities may be increased when compared to conventional devices. Lower effective resistance has the effect of lowering power dissipation in the device, thereby lowering thermal heating effects. Hence, the device is capable of handling higher power signals, such as, when the filter is used in the transmit path either by itself or as the transmit filter part of a duplex filter combination.
In structures with magnetic properties, the distribution of Electric and Magnetic fields (E and H fields, respectively) become non-uniform at points in the structure where sharp edges occur. Modeling and analysis of these distributions are very complex. However, in general, it is noted that field distributions at given points in a structure may be made more even by lessening the severity of the transition between a given point in a structure and adjacent structure, illustratively, by making the transition more gentle using applications of planar to circular geometric transitions. Enabling the transition to be more gentle using applications of planar to circular geometric transitions lends itself to manufacturability. Mathematically speaking, it may be shown that a transition between a straight surface and a circular structure minimizes the geometric perturbation due to the transition. In a field theory sense, as similarly shown mathematically speaking, a transition between a flat structure and a circular structure minimizes the perturbation to field distributions. This lowers effective resistive dissipation of energy at the transition. This is due to the phenomena in which for the same amount of resistance across a given area, a lower current flow results in lower energy dissipation, thus increasing the effective Q.
While the system and method have been described in terms of what are presently considered to be specific examples, the disclosure need not be limited to the disclosed examples. It is intended to cover various modifications and similar arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the claims, the scope of which should be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and similar structures. The present disclosure includes any and all examples of the following claims.
In this respect, before explaining at least one example of the invention in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and to the arrangements of the components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The invention is capable of examples in addition to those described and of being practiced and carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein, as well as the abstract, are for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting.
Reference in this application to “one example,” “an example,” “one or more examples,” or the like means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the example is included in at least one example of the disclosure. The appearances of, for example, the phrases “an example” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same example, nor are separate or alternative examples mutually exclusive of other examples. Moreover, various features are described which may be exhibited by some examples and not by the other. Similarly, various requirements are described which may be requirements for some examples but not by other examples.
This application claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/418,994 filed Nov. 8, 2016, entitled “Ceramic Filters With Improved Electrical Performance,” the contents of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4523162 | Johnson | Jun 1985 | A |
5436602 | McVeety et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
6448871 | Hiroshima et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6556101 | Tada et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
Entry |
---|
English language abstract of Japanese patent publication 61-214801 to Ichiro Koyama, published on Sep. 24, 1986. (Year: 1986). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180131061 A1 | May 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62418994 | Nov 2016 | US |