The present invention generally relates to heat exchangers. The invention particularly relates to channel fin heat exchangers having fluid passages defined by pairs of channels coupled to one another with folded joints.
Heavy duty plate fin heat exchangers are generally characterized by first and second flow passages having perpendicular flow directions, commonly referred to as cross flow. The flow passages are commonly formed by series of spacer bars and plates enclosing fins in parallel at a predetermined spacing. Plate fin heat exchangers are usually produced with piece-by-piece processes that generally require a significant amount of manual labor to manufacture the components and assemble the heat exchanger cores. These products include a relatively large number of brazed joints which may be vulnerable to leaks. As such, these products commonly provide low first pass yield braze rates leading to increased scrap rates and/or costly repairs.
Due to the high costs commonly associated with plate fin heat exchangers, end users often use less expensive but also less durable types of heat exchangers including tube-header heat exchangers, such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,233,719 to Rhodes and U.S. Pat. No. 4,311,193 to Verhaeghe et al. Tube-header heat exchangers generally use fewer components relative to comparable plate fin heat exchangers. However, these products often require customized header plates at various core depths or core stacking heights leading to expensive tooling, increased complexity during production and assembly, and a loss of reliability relative to plate fin heat exchangers due in part to a lack of internal fins and often thin outer tube walls.
In view of the above, it can be appreciated that there are certain problems, shortcomings or disadvantages associated with the prior art, and that it would be desirable if improved methods were available for manufacturing heat exchangers that were capable of at least partly overcoming or avoiding these problems, shortcomings or disadvantages.
The present invention provides channel fin heat exchangers and methods of manufacturing heat exchanger cores for use in the same, for the purpose of producing reliable, high-pressure capacity heat exchangers with semi or fully automated processes.
According to one aspect of the invention, a heat exchanger is provided that includes a series of alternating first and second fluid passages with the first fluid passages having a first flow direction and the second fluid passages having a second flow direction perpendicular to the first flow direction, channels located between and separating the first and second fluid passages formed of a multilayer of a braze clad alloy or a multilayer of brazing material having a thickness of greater than 0.3 mm, spacer bars located at and sealing sides of the first fluid passages with longitudinal axes parallel to the first flow direction and perpendicular to the second flow direction, side walls located at and sealing sides of the second fluid passages with longitudinal axes parallel to the second flow direction and perpendicular to the first flow direction and formed by folded portions of pairs of adjacent channels coupled to form a joint, fins located within the first and second fluid passages, and side panels located at and sealing oppositely disposed ends of the series of alternating first and second fluid passages.
According to another aspect of the invention, a method is provided for manufacturing a heat exchanger core that includes a series of alternating first and second fluid passages separated by channels, the first fluid passages having a first flow direction and the second fluid passages having a second flow direction perpendicular to the first flow direction. The method includes providing a continuous, elongated planar strip of material, advancing the strip in a longitudinal direction thereof along a path, flattening the strip, folding edges of the strip to define partial fold patterns having folded portions perpendicular to unfolded portions of the strip, cutting a formed portion of the strip to produce one of the channels having a predetermined longitudinal length, and assembling pairs of the channels such that the respective partial fold patterns interlock or overlap to define a joint.
Technical effects of the heat exchanger and the method described above preferably include the ability to use semi or fully automated processes to produce solid braze joints free of gaps and leaks and thereby yield reliable, high-pressure capacity heat exchangers.
Other aspects and advantages of this invention will be further appreciated from the following detailed description.
Side panels 10 are located on ends of the series of fluid passages and provide a bounding surface on sides of outermost fins 16 to improve the strength of the heat exchanger structure. Although represented as planar, the side panels 10 may include various mounting features in certain applications.
Oppositely disposed sides of each of the first and second fluid passages are fluidically closed with elongated spacer bars 15 and side walls 17, respectively, that are longitudinally aligned with the flow paths of the corresponding fluid passages. Each of the side walls 17 are defined by folded portions 21 of a pair of adjacent channels 19 coupled to define a joint. For example,
As another example,
In view of the above, it should be understood that the edges of the individual channels (e.g., 19 and 119) may have one or more folded portions (e.g., 21 and 121) and define one or more spacings 112 and may subsequently be coupled to form overlapping and/or interlocking side walls (e.g., 17 and 117).
Although the channels 19 and 119 may be formed by various processes, the overlapping and/or interlocking channel structure described herein provides for the individual members to be formed by an automatic or semiautomatic, continuous process. For example, channels may be formed to include edges with partial fold patterns and a predetermined length from a continuous, elongated, and generally planar sheet or strip of a metal with one or more clad layers of brazing material thereon. The strip may be advanced in its longitudinal direction along a forming path wherein the strip is ultimately formed into multiple individual channels. Within the forming path, the surface of the strip may be flattened using, for example, sets of rolling wheels. Subsequently or simultaneously, one or both edges of the strip may be folded to define the desired partial fold pattern of the channels. Preferably, the edges are formed by a continuous rolling process. The formed portion of the strip may then be cut, for example, with a roller, to yield a channel of a desired length. If each pair of channels includes two identical members arranged to interlock or couple with one another as represented in
Using this type of continuous process, the channels 19 may be formed by folding both edges of the strip ninety degrees once, for example, with V-shaped or W-shaped rollers, such that the resulting folded portions 21 are perpendicular to unfolded portions of the strip (e.g., the body of the channel 19). Notably, one of the folded portions 21 should be longer than the other folded portion 21 as represented in
Channels with edges having multiple folds may be formed using substantially the same method by adding additional folding steps, for example, using a combination of V-shaped, W-shaped, and/or U-shaped rollers aligned parallel to the forming path, to form the desired partial fold patterns. These folds may be formed consecutively or simultaneously. The width of the spacing 112 (“U” in
Due to the construction of the channels 19 and 119, the channel fin heat exchanger cores 13 and 113 may be assembled by essentially stacking the various components. Thus, an automatic heat exchanger core assembly machine can build the channel fin heat exchanger cores 13 and 113 with relatively low labor content and at relatively high building rates. Such processes may be compatible with emerging industry trends such as the concept commonly referred to as Industry 4.0. Automating the assembly process may reduce a significant amount of manual labor, raw material inventory, and production lead time relative to conventional manufacturing processes.
Once assembled, a brazing process may be performed to complete the construction of the channel fin heat exchanger cores 13 and 113. While various brazing processes may be used, it is preferred that a controlled atmosphere brazing (CAB) process is performed. The brazed components, including the channels 19 and 119, may use the brazing material alone, or in combination with a braze supportment such as a braze paste. Preferably, the channels 19 and 119 are formed of a multilayer of a braze clad alloy or of a brazing material having a thickness of greater than 0.3 mm to provide an adequate welding joint with a heavy duty tank (e.g., about 2.5 mm thick).
The edges of the channels 19 and 119 may be precisely deformed during the manufacturing thereof in order to control the degree of angles defined between the resulting folded portions 21 and 121. For example, the angle 130 (
Brazing clearance is particularly important in applications in which the brazing material could be significantly reduced in thickness during the brazing process, for example, down to about ninety percent of its original thickness. Preferably, once assembled brazing clearances between folded portions 21 and 121 of the channels 19 and 119 are less than 0.127 mm. Clearances below 0.127 mm allow for the channel fin heat exchanger cores 13 and 113 to be brazed in either less commonly used vertical or more commonly used horizontal CAB furnaces, potentially with a 97% to 100% of first pass yield braze rate, which allows for the product line to be fully automated. It is believed that any V-shaped pairs (“V” in
The folded joint side walls of the channels of the channel fin heat exchangers are believed to provide several advantages over the spacer bars and plates of conventional plate fin heat exchangers. As examples, the structures and methods of manufacturing described herein promote and likely result in a reduced heat exchanger weight, reduced cost of assembly, reduced duration of the brazing process, and reduced costs associated with operation of the heat exchanger relative to comparable plate fin heat exchangers.
As a nonlimiting example, a plate fin heat exchanger core having fifty internal passages of 100 mm deep and 1000 mm long may have approximately 220.4 m of braze joint length. In contrast, a channel fin heat exchanger core having the same dimensions and same passage numbers of would have approximately only 20.4 m of braze joint length. Thus, the channel fin heat exchanger would have 90.7% less braze joint length, which suggests that the channel fin heat exchanger would also have a significantly improved first pass yield of braze rate relative to the plate fin heat exchanger.
Unlike tube-header heat exchangers, the channel fin heat exchangers do not require specialty tools to form customized components while providing durability, construction flexibility, heat transfer efficiency, and structural strength on par or more likely exceeding plate fin heat exchangers.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,681,155 to Kredo appears to disclose a heat exchanger assembled by a manual stacking process. While not intending to promote any particular interpretation, it appears that Kredo's process would result in a heat exchanger core having a low braze first pass yield rate and the potential for substantial leaks. For example, regular 180-degree return bends generally have an inner radius equal to about one material thickness of the material being bent. In such instance, the resulting gap or spacing between folded portions has a dimension of about two material thicknesses. Producing a bend with a smaller inner radius inherently causes material stretching (deformation). In addition, if these a U-shaped bends (having an inner radius of less than one material thickness) are not supported in some manner, the material may subsequently springback to cause to form a V-shaped bend.
During a brazing process, a portion of the bent material (e.g., clad) will flow to form the braze joint leaving the bent material thinner than prior to brazing, generally about a ten percent reduction in thickness. If the brazing clearance between components is too large, gaps may form in the braze joint leading to leaks. It is believed that the clearance between folds needs to be smaller than 0.127 mm in order to provide a solid braze joint free of gaps and leaks.
Kredo discloses pairs of members that are combined by having folded portions on a first member with about one material thickness being inserted into spacings between two folded portions on a second member. Based on this assembly configuration, the inner bending radius between the folded portions on the second member would be expected be between one-half to one material thickness in order to receive the folded portion of the first member. Therefore, once assembled there would be a gap between the folded portions of the first and second members, and/or the folded portions of the second member would be deformed. Regardless, it is believed that this type of configuration would result in a brazing clearance of greater than 0.127 mm between folds. As such, it is expected that Kredo's folding process followed by brazing would likely result in gaps between folds which can leak during use.
In contrast, the channel fin heat exchangers disclosed herein are formed with interference fit between adjacent folds, for example, by inserting a pair of V-shaped adjacent folded portions with a combined width of about two material thicknesses into a spacing having a width of about two material thicknesses. As noted previously, the angle between the pair of V-shaped adjacent folded portions should be less than 3.6 degrees to control the combined width the pair of V-shaped adjacent folded portions and promote an interference fit within the spacing. In this configuration, during the brazing process the melted clad material is drawn between the folded portions due to capillary attraction resulting in a solid braze joint without leaks.
Therefore, while the invention has been described in terms of specific embodiments, it is apparent that other forms could be adopted by one skilled in the art. For example, the physical configuration of the channel fin heat exchanger, the fluid passages, the fold patterns of the channels 19 and 119, and their respective components could differ in appearance and construction from the embodiments described and shown in the figures, and various materials could be used in their fabrication. In addition, the invention encompasses additional embodiments in which one or more features or aspects of a disclosed embodiments may be omitted or one or more features or aspects of different disclosed embodiments may be combined. Accordingly, it should be understood that the invention is not necessarily limited to any embodiment described herein or shown in the figures. It should also be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed above are for the purpose of describing the disclosed embodiments, and do not necessarily serve as limitations to the scope of the invention. Therefore, the scope of the invention is to be limited only by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2846198 | Sturges | Aug 1958 | A |
2912749 | Bauernfeind et al. | Nov 1959 | A |
3053511 | Godfrey | Sep 1962 | A |
3241607 | Rutledge | Mar 1966 | A |
3495656 | Dickson | Feb 1970 | A |
3517731 | Rothman | Jun 1970 | A |
3601185 | Rothman | Aug 1971 | A |
4006776 | Pfouts et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
4246963 | Anderson | Jan 1981 | A |
4473111 | Steeb | Sep 1984 | A |
4607684 | Wiard et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4681155 | Kredo | Jul 1987 | A |
4729428 | Yasutake et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4804041 | Hasegawa et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4934455 | Hasegawa et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5538079 | Pawlick | Jul 1996 | A |
5709264 | Sweeney et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
6019169 | Ruppel et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6857469 | Meller et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7107680 | Ueda | Sep 2006 | B2 |
8079508 | Foust | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8091621 | Zobel et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8276654 | Zaffetti et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8579021 | Kuehne et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8726508 | Zobel | May 2014 | B2 |
20090014165 | Zobel | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090218085 | Rogers et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20160265854 | Rice | Sep 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3580942 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2016-142490 | Aug 2016 | JP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2019/032110, dated Aug. 27, 2019, (11 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200116432 A1 | Apr 2020 | US |