Beginning with Bragg's introduction of crystallography in 1912, Moseley's ordering of the chemical elements in 1913, and Compton's discovery of the momentum of a photon in 1923, much of what has been learned about physics, chemistry, and biology in the last century was discovered using X-rays. X-rays are now widely used as a tool in materials science and protein crystallography. In medicine, too, X-rays have progressed from Roentgen's first shadow images of the bones in his hand to 3-D computerized tomography.
Many aspects of the present disclosure can be better understood with reference to the following drawings. The components in the drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon clearly illustrating the principles of the present disclosure. Moreover, in the drawings, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the several views.
a) illustrates electron trajectories from a gated field-emitting tip of the system of
b) is an image or an example of a diamond cathode tip and self-aligned gate in accordance with various embodiments of the present disclosure.
Disclosed herein are various embodiments related to channeling radiation as a source of hard X-rays. Reference will now be made in detail to the description of the embodiments as illustrated in the drawings, wherein like reference numbers indicate like parts throughout the several views.
Roentgen's discovery of X-rays in 1895 opened up a new window on the physical world. Paralleling and enabling the advances in X-ray applications has been the continued development of X-ray sources, which have moved from Roentgen's primitive Crookes tube to the recent development of the X-ray free-electron laser (FEL) at SLAC. However, the hard X-ray FEL is large and expensive, and an experiment that requires a day on the machine costs about $1 million just for the machine time. For this reason, most X-ray needs are satisfied by a variety of “conventional” sources and a growing number of unconventional sources that can be dispersed among the labs and offices where the X-rays are used.
A figure of merit can be used to compare the various X-ray sources. Although the total number of X-ray photons is a useful measure for many applications such as, e.g., sterilizing food, newer applications in medical imaging and physics research depend on the coherence of the X-rays. This is better represented by the spectral brilliance (BO of the X-ray beam, which is defined as the number of photons per second, per unit area, per unit solid angle, per unit relative bandwidth:
where n is the number of photons, lithe frequency, t the time, A the area, and Ω the solid angle of the beam.
The importance of the spectral brilliance may be illustrated by focusing an X-ray beam on a specimen using a zone plate. Compared to the flux at the zone plate, the flux (photons per unit area per unit time) at the focus is increased by the factor of 4N2, where N is the number of zones. However, the number of zones cannot usefully exceed the reciprocal bandwidth of the X-ray beam or the coherence of the interfering waves is lost. Putting this together with some simple geometric arguments, the flux at the focus is on the order of Φ˜λBv/2f, where is the wavelength of the X-rays and f is the focal length of the zone plate. This depends only on the spectral brilliance. In a modern synchrotron with a spectral brilliance on the order of 1019 photons/s/mm2/mrad2/0.1% BW at a wavelength of 1 nm (1.2 keV), and a focal length of 1 cm, the photon flux at the focus is 1027 photons/m2-s. For a dipole-allowed, lifetime-broadened transition, the cross-section for x-rays to interact with an atom is on the order of λ2/4˜10−19 m2, and the relative line width is on the order of 4rc/3λ˜1/300, where rc is the classical electron radius. Even allowing for the fact that the radiation bandwidth, 1/N˜1/100, where N is the number of undulator periods, is a bit larger than the line width, the rate of excitation of each atom in the sample is 107/s! This makes it possible to detect a single atom in fluorescence.
Conventional X-ray sources are the result of improvements to the original Crookes tube used by Roentgen. Electrons are accelerated electrostatically from about 10 kV to about 100 kV and impact a metal target. The X-radiation consists of sharp lines (e.g., a few eV wide) from inner-shell transitions in the atoms of an anode plus a broad Bremsstrahlung background. The principle limitation in conventional X-ray tubes is heating of the anode by the electron impacts. To address this problem, high-power tubes use a rotating anode, and in some cases liquid-metal jets have been used. The spectral brilliance from a conventional high-power tube can be as high as 1010 photons/s/mm2/mrad2/0.1% BW at the characteristic lines of the anode, such as 9 keV for Cu Kα and 20 keV for Mo Kα radiation. The Bremsstrahlung background is broad and accounts for most of the photons that are radiated, but the spectral brilliance of the Bremsstrahlung is about three orders of magnitude smaller.
Synchrotron radiation sources presently offer the highest average spectral brilliance in the X-ray regime. Broadband radiation is generated in the bending magnets of an electron storage ring. Spectral brilliance as high as 1015 photons/s/mm2/mrad2/0.1% BW in the keV range has been obtained this way at the Advanced Light Source at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. The critical frequency, above which the radiation begins to fall off exponentially, is ωcrit=3γ2ωNRC, where γ is the Lorentz parameter of the electrons, ωNRC=eB/m˜104 eV is the nonrelativistic cyclotron frequency for the magnetic field B (which may typically be about 1 T) in the bending magnet, e is the electron charge, and is the electron mass. Electrons in the 10 GeV range are needed to generate hard X-rays. To improve the spectral brilliance, static undulator magnets are used to generate narrow-band X-rays at a wavelength of λx˜λu/γ2, where λu is the period of the undulator. The properties of magnet materials optimize λu around a few centimeters, so production of hard X-rays needs electrons in the 10 GeV range. Average spectral brightness in excess of 1019 photons/s/mm2/mrad2/0.1% BW in the 10 keV range has been achieved this way at the Advanced Photon Source at Argonne National Laboratory.
To avoid the GeV electrons needed for conventional undulators, Compton backscatter of laser photons (sometimes referred to as laser undulators) from a relativistic electron beam can be used. The X-ray photon energy is then hvx=4γ2hvL˜5γ2 eV for a 1 μm laser (photon energy hvL˜1.2 eV), which allows hard X-rays to be generated using 10-50 MeV electrons. The linewidth of the X-rays can be determined by the emittance of the electron beam, which causes the focused electrons to cross the axis at an angle. When the laser and the electron beam are optimally focused in the interaction region, the average spectral brilliance is found to be:
where σT is the Thomson cross-section, h is Planck's constant, c is the speed of light, τe is the electron pulse length, τL is the laser pulse length (which may typically be about the same as the electron pulse length), {circumflex over (B)}N is the peak normalized brightness of the electron beam, and
The spectral brilliance will be reduced if the energy spread of the electrons is too large or if the intensity of the laser is high enough to shift the frequency of the backscattered photons. Although the above expression suggests that the spectral brilliance is independent of the electron-beam current, this is true only down to the current at which the broadening of the X-rays is dominated by the energy spread of the electron beam or the laser broadening, rather than the emittance. The only parameters in this expression are the peak brightness of the electron beam and the average laser power. For RF photoelectric injectors, the brightness is on the order of 1013 A/m2-steradian, so to achieve a spectral brilliance of 1012 photons/s/mm2/mrad2/0.1% BW in the 10 keV range, which is an advance of two orders of magnitude beyond a conventional source, requires a laser average power of 1 kW. This might be achieved by recirculating a laser beam of lower power.
Channeling radiation offers an alternative to Compton backscatter. In a crystal, the ions in each crystal plane form a sheet of positive charge. Referring to
Referring now to
The spectral brilliance of the x-radiation depends on how tightly the electron beam can be focused, and this depends on the emittance and the convergence angle of the beam. A high-intensity channeling radiation source may be implemented using a high-brightness electron beam incident on a diamond crystal. Diamond is the best material for this application owing to its high thermal conductivity and radiation resistance. Using a gridded thermionic gun, the normalized emittance of the beam after aperturing can be 10 μm rms at a peak current of 30 A, which corresponds to a peak brightness on the order of 109 A/m2-sterad. With the beam focused to a mm-size spot on the diamond crystal, as many as 1010-1011 photons/s can be obtained in a 10% bandwidth, which corresponds roughly to an average spectral brilliance on the order of 106 photons/s/mm2/mrad2/0.1% BW.
Referring to
The field-emitting tip 415 may be, e.g., a pyramid including a nanodiamond layer. A diamond field-emitting tip may be formed by deposition of a nanodiamond layer in a pyramidal mold. The interior of the pyramid defined by the nanodiamond layer may then be filled with microdiamond or other material. A gated field-emitting tip 415 may be formed using either a volcano process or a SOI process. Other embodiments may include field-emitting tips 415 including, e.g., carbon nanotubes (which may be formed in pyramidal or non-pyramidal shapes), metallic needles (which may be formed using etching or photolithography), or silicon pyramids.
To estimate the emittance from a single field-emitting tip 415, the code CPO was used to simulate the emission from a diamond field emitter with a gated structure 503, as shown in
As illustrated in
In some embodiments, an array of field-emitting cathode tips may be utilized in the RF gun. The field-emitting tips may be gated individually or as a group. For example, gating of the field-emitting tips may be staggered to allow a series of emissions to be accelerated and focused on a diamond crystal to produce hard X-rays. In other implementations, at least a portion of the array of field-emitting tips may be gated together to increase the emission from the electron gun. The beams from each tip would be focused on a corresponding focal spot (e.g., about 20 nm to about 100 nm in diameter) on a diamond crystal. Image processing may then be used to separate an acquired image into portions associated with each field-emitting tip. The separated portions may then be recombined to produce a final image.
An X-ray source based on an RF accelerator could be made compact by using X-band linac technology. Acceleration gradients in excess of 100 MV/m have now been achieved, so that a 40-MeV accelerator—capable of producing 85-keV CR photons—may be achieved with 40 cm of acceleration. Higher-frequency accelerators fabricated lithographically may also make it possible to place the entire accelerator and X-ray source on a single chip.
Because the X-rays are produced by the interaction of the electron beam 418 with the crystal 412, the maximum current of the electron beam 418 is limited by heating of, and radiation damage to, the crystal 412. Measurements and computations show that for diamond at room temperature the effects of heating are acceptable up to a few mA of beam current, so this will not be a limitation even for continuous wave (cw) operation. Measurements show that radiation damage becomes significant above a total beam fluence on the order of a few C per square centimeter. Thus, a 40 nm focal spot is destroyed in about 100 ms. Movement of the crystal 412 can litigate some of this effect. By moving the crystal 412 at about 0.1 mm/s, the crystal is destroyed at a rate of about 0.01 square millimeters per hour.
Diamond field emission cathodes offer a rugged cathode design with individual emitters having exquisitely small emittance. An array of field-emitting cathode tips may be implemented with diamond field emission cathodes. Ungated diamond field emission arrays can be fabricated using, e.g., a pyramidal mold or other appropriate cathode shape.
Diamond deposition is used to form the diamond field emission array 812 in
In
Gated diamond field emission arrays may be fabricated from the ungated diamond field emission arrays in two ways: a volcano process or a SOI process.
Gated diamond field emission arrays may be fabricated from the ungated diamond field emission arrays in two ways: a volcano process or a SOI process.
Channeling radiation can be a source of extremely high spectral brilliance X-rays. The diamond field emission arrays have exhibited excellent uniformity after hitting with greater than 1 μA/tip. Individual diamond field emitters provide electron beams with exquisite brightness. A normalized emittance of 4 nm may be measured. Images from discrete cathode tips may be separated in an XDFI image.
It should be emphasized that the above-described embodiments of the present disclosure are merely possible examples of implementations set forth for a clear understanding of the principles of the disclosure. Many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiment(s) without departing substantially from the spirit and principles of the disclosure. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure and protected by the following claims.
It should be noted that ratios, concentrations, amounts, and other numerical data may be expressed herein in a range format. It is to be understood that such a range format is used for convenience and brevity, and thus, should be interpreted in a flexible manner to include not only the numerical values explicitly recited as the limits of the range, but also to include all the individual numerical values or sub-ranges encompassed within that range as if each numerical value and sub-range is explicitly recited. To illustrate, a concentration range of “about 0.1% to about 5%” should be interpreted to include not only the explicitly recited concentration of about 0.1 wt % to about 5 wt %, but also include individual concentrations (e.g., 1%, 2%, 3%, and 4%) and the sub-ranges (e.g., 0.5%, 1.1%, 2.2%, 3.3%, and 4.4%) within the indicated range. The term “about” can include traditional rounding according to significant figures of numerical values. In addition, the phrase “about ‘x’ to ‘y’” includes “about ‘x’ to about ‘y’”.
This application claims priority to copending U.S. provisional application entitled “CHANNELING X-RAYS” having Ser. No. 61/730,670, filed Nov. 28, 2012, the entirety of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
This invention was made with government support under agreement N66001-11-1-4196 awarded by DARPA and agreement N00014-07-1-1037 awarded by the ONR. The Government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61730670 | Nov 2012 | US |