This description relates to charged particle (e.g., proton or ion) radiation therapy.
The energy of a proton or ion beam for therapy needs to be high compared to the energy of an electron beam used in conventional radiotherapy. A proton beam, for example, that has a residual range of about 32 cm in water is considered adequate to treat any tumor target in the human population. When allowance is made for the reduction in residual range that results from scattering foils used to spread the beam, an initial proton beam energy of 250 MeV is needed to achieve the residual range of 32 cm.
Several kinds of particle accelerators can be used to produce a 250 MeV proton beam at a sufficient beam current (e.g., about 10 nA) for radiotherapy, including linear accelerators, synchrotrons, and cyclotrons.
The design of a proton or ion radiation therapy system for a clinical environment should take account of overall size, cost, and complexity. Available space is usually limited in crowded clinical environments. Lower cost allows more systems to be deployed to reach a broader patient population. Less complexity reduces operating costs and makes the system more reliable for routine clinical use.
Other considerations also bear on the design of such a therapy system. By configuring the system to apply the treatment to patients who are held in a stable, reproducible position (for example, lying supine on a flat table), the physician can more precisely relocate the intended target, relative to the patient's anatomy, at each treatment. Reliable reproduction of the patient's position for each treatment also can be aided using custom molds and braces fitted to the patient. With a patient in a stable, fixed position, the radiotherapy beam can be directed into the patient from a succession of angles, so that, over the course of the treatment, the radiation dose at the target is enhanced while the extraneous radiation dose is spread over non-target tissues.
Traditionally, an isocentric gantry is rotated around the supine patient to direct the radiation beam along successive paths that lie at a range of angles in a common vertical plane toward a single point (called an isocenter) within the patient. By rotating the table on which the patient lies around a vertical axis, the beam can be directed into the patient along different paths. Other techniques have been used to vary the position of the radiation source around the patient, including robotic manipulation. And other ways to move or reposition the patient have been used.
In high energy x-ray beam therapy, the x-ray beam may be directed toward the isocenter from an electron linear accelerator mounted on the gantry or robotic arm.
In typical proton beam therapy, the circular particle accelerator that produces the beam is too large to mount on the gantry. Instead, the accelerator is mounted in a fixed position and the particle beam is redirected through a rotating gantry using magnetic beam steering elements. Blosser has proposed to mount an accelerator on the side of the gantry near the horizontal axis of rotation.
In general, in one aspect, an accelerator is mounted on a gantry to enable the accelerator to move through a range of positions around a patient on a patient support. The accelerator is configured to produce a proton or ion beam having an energy level sufficient to reach any arbitrary target in the patient from positions within the range. The proton or ion beam passes essentially directly from the accelerator housing to the patient.
Implementations may include one or more of the following features. The gantry is supported for rotation on bearings on two sides of the patient support. The gantry has two legs extending from an axis of rotation and a truss between the two legs on which the accelerator is mounted. The gantry is constrained to rotate within a range of positions that is smaller than 360 degrees, at least as large as 180 degrees and in some implementations in the range from about 180 degrees to about 330 degrees. (A rotation range of 180 degrees is sufficient to provide for all angles of approach into a supine patient.) Radio-protective walls include at least one wall that is not in line with the proton or ion beam from the accelerator in any of the positions within the range; that wall is constructed to provide the same radio-protection with less mass. The patient support is mounted in an area that is accessible through a space defined by a range of positions at which the gantry is constrained not to rotate. The patient support is movable relative to the gantry including rotation about a patient axis of rotation that is vertical. The patient axis of rotation contains an isocenter in the vicinity of a patient on the patient support. The gantry axis of rotation is horizontal and contains the isocenter. The accelerator weighs less than 40 Tons and in typical implementations within a range from 5 to 30 tons, occupies a volume of less than 4.5 cubic meters and typically in a range from 0.7 to 4.5 cubic meters, and produces a proton or ion beam having an energy level of at least 150 MeV and in a range from 150 to 300 MeV, for example 250 MeV.
The accelerator can be a synchrocyclotron with a magnet structure that has a field strength of at least 6 Tesla and can be from 6 to 20 Tesla. The magnet structure includes superconducting windings that are cooled by cryo-coolers. The proton or ion beam passes directly from the accelerator to the general area of the patient stand. A shielding chamber containing the patient support, the gantry, and the accelerator includes at least one wall of the chamber being thinner than other walls of the chamber. A portion of the chamber can be embedded within the earth.
In general, in one aspect, an accelerator is configured to produce a proton or ion beam having an energy level sufficient to reach any arbitrary target in a patient. The accelerator is small enough and lightweight enough to be mounted on a rotatable gantry in an orientation to permit the proton or ion beam to pass essentially directly from the accelerator housing to the patient.
In general, in one aspect, a medical synchrocyclotron has a superconducting electromagnetic structure that generates a field strength of at least 6 Tesla, produces a beam of particles, such as protons, having an energy level of at least 150 MeV, has a volume no larger than 4.5 cubic meters, and has a weight less than 30 Tons.
In general, in one aspect, a patient is supported within a treatment space, a beam of proton or ions pass in a straight line direction from an output of an accelerator to any arbitrary target within the patient, and the straight line direction is caused to be varied through a range of directions around the patient.
In general, in an aspect, a structure includes a patient support and a gantry on which an accelerator is mounted to enable the accelerator to move through a range of positions around a patient on the patient support. The accelerator is configured to produce a proton or ion beam having an energy level sufficient to reach any arbitrary target in the patient from positions within the range. A walled enclosure contains the patient support, the gantry, and the accelerator. In some examples, more than half of the surface of the walled enclosure is embedded within the earth.
Other aspects include other combinations of the aspects and features discussed above and other features expressed as apparatus, systems, methods, software products, business methods, and in other ways.
By generating a magnetic field of about 10 Tesla, the size of the accelerator approaches 1.5 meter and the mass is reduced to about 15 to 20 tons. The weight will depend on the stray magnetic field that is to be allowed near the accelerator. Even smaller weights and sizes may be possible. This enables the cyclotron to be placed on a gantry, with the output beam aimed directly at the isocenter, and rotated around the patient, thus simplifying the delivery of proton or ion beam radiation therapy. All extracted beam focusing and steering elements are incorporated into the accelerator or immediately adjacent to it. The direct mounting of the accelerator on the gantry eliminates beam transport elements that would otherwise be required to transport the beam from the accelerator to the target volume within the patient. The size, complexity and cost of a proton or ion beam therapy system are reduced and its performance is improved. Reducing the range of rotation of the gantry to be less than 360 degrees in the vertical plane reduces the thickness of the shielding barrier that must be provided at locations to which the beam is never directed. It also allows for ease of access to the patient treatment space. The synchrocyclotron can be scaled to arbitrarily high fields without compromising beam focusing during acceleration. The elimination of cryogenic liquid cooled coils reduces the risk to the operator and the patient if vaporized liquid cryogen were to be released during a fault condition such as a magnet quench.
Other advantages and features will become apparent from the following description and from the claims.
As shown in
In some implementations, the steel gantry has two legs 508, 510 mounted for rotation on two respective bearings 512, 514 that lie on opposite sides of the patient. The accelerator is supported by a steel truss 516 that is long enough to span a treatment area 518 in which the patient lies (e.g., twice as long as a tall person, to permit the person to be rotated fully within the space with any desired target area of the patient remaining in the line of the beam) and is attached stably at both ends to the rotating legs of the gantry.
In some examples, the rotation of the gantry is limited to a range 520 of less than 360 degrees, e.g., about 180 degrees, to permit a floor 522 to extend from a wall of the vault 524 that houses the therapy system into the patient treatment area. The limited rotation range of the gantry also reduces the required thickness of some of the walls (which never directly receive the beam, e.g., wall 530) which provide radiation shielding of people outside the treatment area. A range of 180 degrees of gantry rotation is enough to cover all treatment approach angles, but providing a larger range of travel can be useful. For example the range of rotation may usefully be between 180 and 330 degrees and still provide clearance for the therapy floor space. When the range of travel is large, the gantry may swing to positions that are hazardous to people or equipment positioned in a portion of the therapy space.
The horizontal rotational axis 532 of the gantry is located nominally one meter above the floor where the patient and therapist interact with the therapy system. This floor is positioned about 3 meters above the bottom floor of the therapy system shielded vault. The accelerator can swing under the raised floor for delivery of treatment beams from below the rotational axis. The patient couch moves and rotates in a substantially horizontal plane parallel to the rotational axis of the gantry. The couch can rotate through a range 534 of about 270 degrees in the horizontal plane with this configuration. This combination of gantry and patient rotational ranges and degrees of freedom allow the therapist to select virtually any approach angle for the beam. If needed, the patient can be placed on the couch in the opposite orientation and then all possible angles can be used.
In some implementations, the accelerator uses a synchrocyclotron configuration having a very high magnetic field superconducting electromagnetic structure. Because the bend radius of a charged particle of a given kinetic energy is reduced in direct proportion to an increase in the magnetic field applied to it, the very high magnetic field superconducting magnetic structure permits the accelerator to be made smaller and lighter.
For an average magnetic field strength larger than about 5 Tesla, an isochronous cyclotron (in which the magnet is constructed to make the magnetic field stronger near the circumference than at the center to compensate for the mass increase and maintain a constant frequency of revolution) is impractical to use to achieve 250 MeV protons. This is because the angular variation in magnetic field used to maintain the beam focus in the isochronous cyclotron cannot be made large enough using iron pole face shaping.
The accelerator described here is a synchrocyclotron. The synchrocyclotron uses a magnetic field that is uniform in rotation angle and falls off in strength with increasing radius. Such a field shape can be achieved regardless of the magnitude of the magnetic field, so in theory there is no upper limit to the magnetic field strength (and therefore the resulting particle energy at a fixed radius) that can be used in a synchrocyclotron.
Certain superconducting materials begin to lose their superconducting properties in the presence of very high magnetic fields. High performance superconducting wire windings are used to allow very high magnetic fields to be achieved.
Superconducting materials typically need to be cooled to low temperatures for their superconducting properties to be realized. In some examples described here, cryo-coolers are used to bring the superconducting coil windings to temperatures near absolute zero. Using cryo-coolers, rather than bath cooling the windings in liquid Helium, reduces complexity and cost.
The synchrocyclotron is supported on the gantry so that the beam is generated directly in line with the patient. The gantry permits rotation of the cyclotron about a horizontal rotational axis that contains a point (isocenter 540) within or near the patient. The split truss that is parallel to the rotational axis, supports the cyclotron on both sides.
Because the rotational range of the gantry is limited, a patient support area can be accommodated in a wide area around the isocenter. Because the floor can be extended broadly around the isocenter, a patient support table can be positioned to move relative to and to rotate about a vertical axis 542 through the isocenter so that, by a combination of gantry rotation and table motion and rotation, any angle of beam direction into any part of the patient can be achieved. The two gantry arms are separated by more than twice the height of a tall patient, allowing the couch with patient to rotate and translate in a horizontal plane above the raised floor.
Limiting the gantry rotation angle allows for a reduction in the thickness of at least one of the walls surrounding the treatment room. Thick walls, typically constructed of concrete, provide radiation protection to individuals outside the treatment room. A wall downstream of a stopping proton beam needs to be about twice as thick as a wall at the opposite end of the room to provide an equivalent level of protection. Limiting the range of gantry rotation enables the treatment room to be sited below earth grade on three sides while allowing an occupied area adjacent to the thinnest wall reducing the cost of constructing the treatment room.
In the example implementation shown in
The radiation therapy system described in this example is used for proton radiation therapy, but the same principles and details can be applied in analogous systems for use in heavy ion (ion) treatment systems.
As shown in
The two superconducting magnet coils are centered on a common axis 47 and are spaced apart along the axis. As shown in
The geometry of the coil is maintained by mounting the coils in a “reverse” rectangular bobbin 56 and incorporating a pre-compression stainless steel bladder 58 between each coil and an inner face 57 of the bobbin to exert a restorative force 60 that works against the distorting force produced when the coils are energized. The bladder is pre-compressed after the coils and the heater blanket are assembled on the bobbin, by injecting epoxy into the bladder and allowing it to harden. The precompression force of the bladder is set to minimize the strain in the brittle Nb3Sn superconducting matrix through all phases of cool-down and magnet energizing.
As shown in
As shown in
The superconducting coils are maintained at temperatures near absolute zero (e.g., about 4 degrees Kelvin) by enclosing the coil assembly (the coils and the bobbin) inside an evacuated annular aluminum or stainless steel cryostatic chamber 70 that provides a free space around the coil structure, except at a limited set of support points 71, 73. In an alternate version the outer wall of the cryostat may be made of low carbon steel to provide an additional return flux path for the magnetic field. The temperature near absolute zero is achieved and maintained using two Gifford-McMahon cryo-coolers 72, 74 that are arranged at different positions on the coil assembly. Each cryo-cooler has a cold end 76 in contact with the coil assembly. The cryo-cooler heads 78 are supplied with compressed Helium from a compressor 80. Two other Gifford-McMahon cryo-coolers 77, 79 are arranged to cool high temperature (e.g., 60-80 degrees Kelvin) leads 81 that supply current to the superconducting windings.
The coil assembly and cryostatic chambers are mounted within and fully enclosed by two halves 81, 83 of a pillbox-shaped magnet yoke 82. In this example, the inner diameter of the coil assembly is about 140 cm. The iron yoke 82 provides a path for the return magnetic field flux 84 and magnetically shields the volume 86 between the pole faces 44, 46 to prevent external magnetic influences from perturbing the shape of the magnetic field within that volume. The yoke also serves to decrease the stray magnetic field in the vicinity of the accelerator.
As shown in
The discharged electrons ionize the gas exiting through a small hole from tube 194 to create a supply of positive ions (protons) for acceleration by one semicircular (dee-shaped) radio-frequency plate 100 that spans half of the space enclosed by the magnet structure and one dummy dee plate 102. As shown in
For the beam emerging from the centrally located ion source to clear the ion source structure as it begins to spiral outward, a large voltage difference is required across the radiofrequency plates. 20,000 Volts is applied across the radiofrequency plates. In some versions from 8,000 to 20,000 Volts may be applied across the radiofrequency plates. To reduce the power required to drive this large voltage, the magnet structure is arranged to reduce the capacitance between the radio frequency plates and ground. This is done by forming holes with sufficient clearance from the radiofrequency structures through the outer yoke and the cryostat housing and making sufficient space between the magnet pole faces.
The high voltage alternating potential that drives the dee plate has a frequency that is swept downward during the accelerating cycle to account for the increasing relativistic mass of the protons and the decreasing magnetic field. The dummy dee does not require a hollow semi-cylindrical structure as it is at ground potential along with the vacuum chamber walls. Other plate arrangements could be used such as more than one pair of accelerating electrodes driven with different electrical phases or multiples of the fundamental frequency. The RF structure can be tuned to keep the Q high during the required frequency sweep by using, for example, a rotating capacitor having intermeshing rotating and stationary blades. During each meshing of the blades, the capacitance increases, thus lowering the resonant frequency of the RF structure. The blades can be shaped to create a precise frequency sweep required. A drive motor for the rotating condenser can be phase locked to the RF generator for precise control. One bunch of particles is accelerated during each meshing of the blades of the rotating condenser.
The vacuum chamber 119 in which the acceleration occurs is a generally cylindrical container that is thinner in the center and thicker at the rim. The vacuum chamber encloses the RF plates and the ion source and is evacuated by the vacuum pump 111. Maintaining a high vacuum insures that accelerating ions are not lost to collisions with gas molecules and enables the RF voltage to be kept at a higher level without arcing to ground.
Protons traverse a generally spiral path beginning at the ion source. In half of each loop of the spiral path, the protons gain energy as they pass through the RF electric field in space 107. As the ions gain energy, the radius of the central orbit of each successive loop of their spiral path is larger than the prior loop until the loop radius reaches the maximum radius of the pole face. At that location a magnetic and electric field perturbation directs ions into an area where the magnetic field rapidly decreases, and the ions depart the area of the high magnetic field and are directed through an evacuated tube 38 to exit the yoke of the cyclotron. The ions exiting the cyclotron will tend to disperse as they enter the area of markedly decreased magnetic field that exists in the room around the cyclotron. Beam shaping elements 107, 109 in the extraction channel 38 redirect the ions so that they stay in a straight beam of limited spatial extent.
The magnetic field within the pole gap needs to have certain properties to maintain the beam within the evacuated chamber as it accelerates. The magnetic field index
n=−(r/B)dB/dr
must be kept positive to maintain this “weak” focusing. Here r is the radius of the beam and B is the magnetic field. Additionally the field index needs to be maintained below 0.2,because at this value the periodicity of radial oscillations and vertical oscillations of the beam coincide in a νr=2 νZ resonance. The betatron frequencies are defined by νr=(1−n)1/2 and νZ=n1/2 The ferromagnetic pole face is designed to shape the magnetic field generated by the coils so that the field index n is maintained positive and less than 0.2 in the smallest diameter consistent with a 250 MeV beam in the given magnetic field.
As the beam exits the extraction channel it is passed through a beam formation system 125 that can be programmably controlled to create a desired combination of scattering angle and range modulation for the beam. Examples of beam forming systems useful for that purpose are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/949,734,titled “A Programmable Particle Scatterer for Radiation Therapy Beam Formation”, filed Sep. 24, 2004,and U.S. provisional patent application Ser. 60/590,088,filed Jul. 21, 2005,both of which are incorporated in their entirety by this reference.
During operation, the plates absorb energy from the applied radio frequency field as a result of conductive resistance along the surfaces of the plates. This energy appears as heat and is removed from the plates using water cooling lines 108 that release the heat in a heat exchanger 113.
Stray magnetic fields exiting from the cyclotron are limited by both the pillbox magnet yoke (which also serves as a shield) and a separate magnetic shield 114. The separate magnetic shield includes of a layer 117 of ferromagnetic material (e.g., steel or iron) that encloses the pillbox yoke, separated by a space 116. This configuration that includes a sandwich of a yoke, a space, and a shield achieves adequate shielding for a given leakage magnetic field at lower weight.
As mentioned, the gantry allows the synchrocyclotron to be rotated about the horizontal rotational axis 532. The truss structure 516 has two generally parallel spans 580, 582. The synchrocyclotron is cradled between the spans about midway between the legs. The gantry is balanced for rotation about the bearings using counterweights 122, 124 mounted on ends of the legs opposite the truss.
The gantry is driven to rotate by an electric motor mounted to one of the gantry legs and connected to the bearing housings by drive gears and belts or chains. The rotational position of the gantry is derived from signals provided by shaft angle encoders incorporated into the gantry drive motors and the drive gears.
At the location at which the ion beam exits the cyclotron, the beam formation system 125 acts on the ion beam to give it properties suitable for patient treatment. For example, the beam may be spread and its depth of penetration varied to provide uniform radiation across a given target volume. The beam formation system can include passive scattering elements as well as active scanning elements.
All of the active systems of the synchrocyclotron (the current driven superconducting coils, the RF-driven plates, the vacuum pumps for the vacuum acceleration chamber and for the superconducting coil cooling chamber, the current driven ion source, the hydrogen gas source, and the RF plate coolers, for example), are controlled by appropriate synchrocyclotron control electronics (not shown).
The control of the gantry, the patient support, the active beam shaping elements, and the synchrocyclotron to perform a therapy session is achieved by appropriate therapy control electronics (not shown).
As shown in
For safety and aesthetic reasons, a therapy room 160 is constructed within the vault. The therapy room is cantilevered from walls 154, 156, 150 and the base 162 of the containing room into the space between the gantry legs in a manner that clears the swinging gantry and also maximizes the extent of the floor space 164 of the therapy room. Periodic servicing of the accelerator can be accomplished in the space below the raised floor. When the accelerator is rotated to the down position on the gantry, full access to the accelerator is possible in a space separate from the treatment area. Power supplies, cooling equipment, vacuum pumps and other support equipment can be located under the raised floor in this separate space.
Within the treatment room, the patient support 170 can be mounted in a variety of ways that permit the support to be raised and lowered and the patient to be rotated and moved to a variety of positions and orientations.
Additional information concerning the design of the accelerator can be found in U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/760,788,entitled HIGH-FIELD SUPERCONDUCTING SYNCHROCYCLOTRON (T. Antaya), filed Jan. 20, 2006, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/463,402,entitled MAGNET STRUCTURE FOR PARTICLE ACCELERATION (T. Antaya, et al.), filed Aug. 9, 2006,and U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/850,565, entitled CRYOGENIC VACUUM BREAK PNEUMATIC THERMAL COUPLER (Radovinsky et al.), filed Oct. 10, 2006, all of which are incorporated in their entireties by reference here.
Other implementations are within the scope of the following claims.
This application is entitled to the benefit of the filing date of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/738,404, filed Nov. 18, 2005, the entire text of which is incorporated by reference here.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2615129 | McMillan | Oct 1952 | A |
3175131 | Burleigh et al. | Mar 1965 | A |
3432721 | Naydan et al. | Mar 1969 | A |
3679899 | Dimeff | Jul 1972 | A |
3689847 | Verster | Sep 1972 | A |
3868522 | Bigham et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3925676 | Bigham et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
3958327 | Marancik et al. | May 1976 | A |
3992625 | Schmidt et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4038622 | Purcell | Jul 1977 | A |
4047068 | Ress et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4112306 | Nunan | Sep 1978 | A |
4129784 | Tschunt et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4139777 | Rautenbach | Feb 1979 | A |
4197510 | Szu | Apr 1980 | A |
4220866 | Symmons et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4336505 | Meyer | Jun 1982 | A |
4345210 | Tran | Aug 1982 | A |
4353033 | Kurasawa | Oct 1982 | A |
4507614 | Prono et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4507616 | Blosser et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4589126 | Augustsson et al. | May 1986 | A |
4633125 | Blosser et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4641057 | Blosser et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4641104 | Blosser et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4680565 | Jahnke | Jul 1987 | A |
4705955 | Mileikowsky | Nov 1987 | A |
4710722 | Jahnke | Dec 1987 | A |
4726046 | Nunan | Feb 1988 | A |
4734653 | Jahnke | Mar 1988 | A |
4737727 | Yamada et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4739173 | Blosser et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4745367 | Dustmann et al. | May 1988 | A |
4754147 | Maughan et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4769623 | Marsing et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4771208 | Jongen et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4783634 | Yamamoto et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4808941 | Marsing | Feb 1989 | A |
4812658 | Koehler | Mar 1989 | A |
4843333 | Marsing et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4865284 | Gosis et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4868843 | Nunan | Sep 1989 | A |
4868844 | Nunan | Sep 1989 | A |
4870287 | Cole et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4880985 | Jones | Nov 1989 | A |
4902993 | Krevent | Feb 1990 | A |
4904949 | Wilson | Feb 1990 | A |
4905267 | Miller et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4917344 | Prechter et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4943781 | Wilson et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4987309 | Klasen et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4996496 | Kitamura et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5017789 | Young et al. | May 1991 | A |
5017882 | Finlan | May 1991 | A |
5036290 | Sonobe et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5039057 | Prechter et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5039867 | Nishihara et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5072123 | Johnsen | Dec 1991 | A |
5111173 | Matsuda et al. | May 1992 | A |
5117194 | Nakanishi et al. | May 1992 | A |
5117212 | Yamamoto et al. | May 1992 | A |
5117829 | Miller et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5166531 | Huntzinger | Nov 1992 | A |
5189687 | Bova et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5240218 | Dye | Aug 1993 | A |
5260581 | Lesyna et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5278533 | Kawaguchi | Jan 1994 | A |
5317164 | Kurokawa | May 1994 | A |
5336891 | Crewe | Aug 1994 | A |
5341104 | Anton et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5349198 | Takanaka | Sep 1994 | A |
5365742 | Boffito et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5374913 | Pissantezky et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5382914 | Hamm et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5405235 | Lebre et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5440133 | Moyers et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5461773 | Kawaguchi | Oct 1995 | A |
5463291 | Carroll et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5511549 | Legg et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5521469 | Laisne | May 1996 | A |
5585642 | Britton et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5668371 | Deasy et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5726448 | Smith et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5778047 | Mansfield et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5811944 | Sampayan et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818058 | Nakanishi et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5821705 | Caporaso et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5825845 | Blair et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5841237 | Alton | Nov 1998 | A |
5846043 | Spath | Dec 1998 | A |
5851182 | Sahadevan | Dec 1998 | A |
5866912 | Slater et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5874811 | Finlan et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5895926 | Britton et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5920601 | Nigg et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5929458 | Nemezawa et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5993373 | Nonaka et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6034377 | Pu | Mar 2000 | A |
6057655 | Jongen | May 2000 | A |
6061426 | Linders et al. | May 2000 | A |
6094760 | Nonaka et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6265837 | Akiyama et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6268610 | Pu | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278239 | Caporaso et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6279579 | Riaziat et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6316776 | Hiramoto et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6433336 | Jongen et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6433349 | Akiyama et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6441569 | Janzow | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6443349 | Van Der Burg | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6476403 | Dolinskii et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6492922 | New | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501981 | Schweikard et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6621889 | Mostafavi | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6683318 | Haberer et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6683426 | Kleeven | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6693283 | Eickhoff et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6710362 | Kraft et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6717162 | Jongen | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6769806 | Moyers | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6774383 | Norimine et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6777700 | Yanagisawa et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6800866 | Amemiya et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6803591 | Muramatsu et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6814694 | Pedroni | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6891177 | Kraft et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6914396 | Symons et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
7014361 | Ein-Gal | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7026636 | Yanagisawa et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7173385 | Caporaso et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7208748 | Sliski et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7348579 | Pedroni | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7402963 | Sliski | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7466085 | Nutt | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7476883 | Nutt | Jan 2009 | B2 |
20030048080 | Amemiya et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030152197 | Moyers | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163015 | Yanagisawa et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030183779 | Norimine et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030234369 | Glukhoy | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040000650 | Yanagisawa et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040056212 | Yanagisawa et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040061077 | Muramatsu et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040061078 | Muramatsu et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040085023 | Chistyakov | May 2004 | A1 |
20040098445 | Baumann et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111134 | Muramatsu et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040118081 | Reimoser et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040149934 | Yanagisawa et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040173763 | Moriyama et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040174958 | Moriyama et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040183033 | Moriyama et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040183035 | Yanagisawa et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040200982 | Moriyama et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040200983 | Fujimaki et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040213381 | Harada | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040227104 | Matsuda et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040232356 | Norimine et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040240626 | Moyers | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050089141 | Brown | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050161618 | Eros | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050184686 | Caporaso et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050228255 | Saracen et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234327 | Saracen et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050247890 | Norimine et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060126792 | Li | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060284562 | Hruby et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070001128 | Sliski et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070013273 | Albert et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070014654 | Haverfield et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070023699 | Yamashita et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070092812 | Caporaso et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070145916 | Caporaso et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070171015 | Antaya | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070181519 | Khoshnevis | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080093567 | Gall | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080218102 | Sliski | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090096179 | Stark et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090140671 | O'Neal, III et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090140672 | Gall et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090200483 | Gall et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2753397 | Jun 1978 | DE |
31 48 100 | Jun 1983 | DE |
3530446 | Aug 1984 | DE |
41 01 094 | May 1992 | DE |
4411171 | Oct 1995 | DE |
0194728 | Sep 1986 | EP |
0 277 521 | Aug 1988 | EP |
0208163 | Jan 1989 | EP |
0222786 | Jul 1990 | EP |
0221987 | Jan 1991 | EP |
0499253 | Aug 1992 | EP |
0 306 966 | Apr 1995 | EP |
0 388 123 | May 1995 | EP |
0 465 597 | May 1997 | EP |
0 864 337 | Sep 1998 | EP |
0 776 595 | Dec 1998 | EP |
1 069 809 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1 153 398 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1 294 445 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1 348 465 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1 358 908 | Nov 2003 | EP |
1 371 390 | Dec 2003 | EP |
1 402 923 | Mar 2004 | EP |
0 911 064 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1 430 932 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1430932 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1 454 653 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1 454 654 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1 454 655 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1 454 656 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1 454 657 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1 477 206 | Nov 2004 | EP |
1 605 742 | Dec 2005 | EP |
1738798 | Jan 2007 | EP |
1826778 | Aug 2007 | EP |
1949404 | Jul 2008 | EP |
2 560 421 | Aug 1985 | FR |
2911843 | Aug 2008 | FR |
957342 | May 1964 | GB |
2015821 | Sep 1979 | GB |
2 361 523 | Oct 2001 | GB |
43-23267 | Oct 1968 | JP |
61-80800 | Apr 1986 | JP |
62-150804 | Jul 1987 | JP |
62-186500 | Aug 1987 | JP |
63-149344 | Jun 1988 | JP |
63-218200 | Sep 1988 | JP |
63-226899 | Sep 1988 | JP |
1-276797 | Nov 1989 | JP |
4-94198 | Mar 1992 | JP |
04-128717 | Apr 1992 | JP |
04-129768 | Apr 1992 | JP |
04-273409 | Sep 1992 | JP |
04-337300 | Nov 1992 | JP |
05-341352 | Dec 1993 | JP |
06233831 | Aug 1994 | JP |
06233831 | Aug 1994 | JP |
06-036893 | Oct 1994 | JP |
2007-260939 | Oct 1995 | JP |
07260939 | Oct 1995 | JP |
08-173890 | Jul 1996 | JP |
08-264298 | Oct 1996 | JP |
09-162585 | Jun 1997 | JP |
10-071213 | Mar 1998 | JP |
11-47287 | Feb 1999 | JP |
11-102800 | Apr 1999 | JP |
11-243295 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2000-294399 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2001-6900 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001-129103 | May 2001 | JP |
2002-164686 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2009-515671 | Apr 2009 | JP |
300137 | Nov 1969 | SU |
569 635 | Aug 1977 | SU |
200930160 | Jul 2009 | TW |
200934682 | Aug 2009 | TW |
200939908 | Sep 2009 | TW |
200940120 | Oct 2009 | TW |
WO 8607229 | Dec 1986 | WO |
WO90012413 | Oct 1990 | WO |
WO 9203028 | Feb 1992 | WO |
WO 9302536 | Feb 1993 | WO |
WO 9817342 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO9939385 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 0040064 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0049624 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0126569 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0207817 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 03039212 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 03092812 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 2004026401 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2004101070 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO2007061937 | May 2007 | WO |
WO 2007061937 | May 2007 | WO |
WO2007084701 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO2007130164 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO2007145906 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO2008030911 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2009048745 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO2009-070173 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO2009-070588 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO2009-073480 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO 2009048745 | Nov 2009 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080093567 A1 | Apr 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60738404 | Nov 2005 | US |