Class of grain growth modifiers for the preparation of high chloride (111) tabular grain emulsions (II)

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to the precipitation of radiation sensitive silver halide emulsions useful in photography.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Radiation sensitive silver halide emulsions containing one or a combination of chloride, bromide and iodide ions have been long recognized to be useful in photography. Each halide ion selection is known to impart particular photographic advantages. Although known and used for many years for selected photographic applications, the more rapid developability and the ecological advantages of high chloride emulsions have provided an impetus for employing these emulsions over a broader range of photographic applications. As employed herein the term "high chloride emulsion" refers to a silver halide emulsion containing at least 50 mole percent chloride and less than 5 mole percent iodide, based on total silver.
During the 1980's a marked advance took place in silver halide photography based on the discovery that a wide range of photographic advantages, such as improved speed-granularity relationships, increased covering power (both on an absolute basis and as a function of binder hardening), more rapid developability, increased thermal stability, increased separation of native and spectral sensitization imparted imaging speeds, and improved image sharpness in both mono- and multi-emulsion layer formats, can be realized by increasing the proportions of selected tabular grain populations in photographic emulsions.
These various photographic advantages were associated with achieving emulsions in which tabular grains having {111} major faces account for at least 50 percent of total grain projected area, hereinafter referred to as {111} tabular grain emulsions. Although the art has succeeded in preparing high chloride {111} tabular grain emulsions, the inclusion of high levels of chloride as opposed to bromide, alone or in combination with iodide, has been difficult. The basic reason is that tabular grains are produced by incorporating parallel twin planes in grains grown under conditions favoring {111} crystal faces. The most prominent feature of tabular grains are their parallel {111} major crystal faces.
To produce successfully a high chloride tabular grain emulsion two obstacles must be overcome. First, conditions must be found that incorporate parallel twin planes into the grains. Second, the strong propensity of silver chloride to produce {100} crystal faces must be overcome by finding conditions that favor the formation of {111} crystal faces.
Through extensive investigations organic compounds, hereinafter referred to as grain growth modifiers, have been identified that efficiently produce high chloride {111} tabular grain emulsions. Aromatic N-heterocyclic compounds capable of acting as grain growth modifiers include those disclosed by Maskasky U.S. Pat. No. 4,400,463 (e.g., adenine), Maskasky U.S. Pat. No. 4,713,323 (e.g., 4-amino-pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine), Tufano et al U.S. Pat. No. 4,804,621 (e.g., 2,4-diamino-1,3,5-triazine), Maskasky U.S. Pat. No. 5,178,997 (e.g., 7-azaindole), Maskasky et al U.S. Pat. No. 5,178,998 (e.g., xanthine) and Maskasky U.S. Pat. No. 5,185,239 (e.g., 4,5,6-triaminopyrimidine). Dicationic bipyridinium salts capable of acting as grain growth modifiers include those described by Marimoto U.S. Pat. No. 4,983,508 (e.g., 1,1'-dibenzyl-4,4'-bipyridinium dichloride). Sulfur containing organic compounds capable of acting as grain growth modifiers include those described by Takada et al U.S. Pat. No. 4,783,398 (e.g., 2,4-thiazolidinedione) and Nishikawa et al U.S. Pat. No. 4,952,491 (e.g., 5-(3-ethyl-2(3)benzothiazolylidene)-3-.beta.-sulfoethyl-rhodanine).
Maskasky U.S. Pat. No. 5,298,387 teaches to prepare a high chloride {111} tabular grain emulsion in the presence of an N-heterocyclic grain growth modifier, specifically a 2-hydroaminoazine. Thereafter the adsorbed 2-hydroaminoazine can be released from the tabular grain surfaces and replaced by a 5-iodobenzoxazolium compound. Although 5-iodobenzoxazolium compounds are capable of stabilizing high chloride {111} tabular grains once formed, these compounds cannot be relied upon as grain growth modifiers to produce high chloride {111} tabular grains in the course of emulsion precipitation.
Pollet et al U.S. Pat. No. 3,982,947 discloses as useful antifoggants iodobenzenes substituted with a hydroxy or carboxy group and from 1 to 4 substituents chosen from the group consisting of hydrogen, halogen, alkyl, alkoxy, alkoxycarbonyl, sulfo, aryl, fused-on benzene, hydroxy and carboxy.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is based on the discovery of a new class of organic grain growth modifiers for use in the precipitation of high chloride {111} tabular grain emulsions.
In one preferred form the invention is directed to a process of preparing a high chloride {111} tabular grain emulsion, wherein tabular grains are formed having {111} major faces, containing at least 50 mole percent chloride and less than 5 mole percent iodide, based on silver, and accounting for at least 50 percent of total grain projected area, comprising introducing silver ion into a gelatino-peptizer dispersing medium containing a stoichiometric excess of chloride ions with respect to silver ions and a grain growth modifier, wherein the grain growth modifier is a phenol that is incapable of reducing silver chloride and has at least two iodo substituents.
DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
The present invention is directed to a process of preparing high chloride {111} tabular grain emulsions in the presence of a novel class of grain growth modifiers--specifically, a phenol (aryl hydroxide) that is incapable of reducing silver chloride and that has at least two iodo substituents, hereinafter also referred to as a polyiodophenyl.
In one simple form the phenol can be a hydroxy benzene containing at least two iodo substituents. It is synthetically most convenient to place the iodide substituents in at least two of the 2, 4 and 6 ring positions. When the benzene ring is substituted with only the one hydroxy group and iodo moieties, all of the possible combinations are useful as grain growth modifiers in the practice of the invention.
The hydroxy benzene with two or more iodo substituents remains a useful grain growth modifier when additional substituents are added, provided none of the additional substituents convert the compound to a reducing agent. Specifically, to be useful in the practice of the invention the phenol with two or more iodo substituents must be incapable of reducing silver chloride under the conditions of precipitation. Silver chloride is the most easily reduced of the photographic silver halides; thus, if a compound will not reduce silver chloride, it will not reduce any photographic silver halide. The reason for excluding compounds that are silver chloride reducing agents is that reduction of silver chloride as it is being precipitated creates Ag.degree. that produces photographic fog on processing.
Fortunately, phenols that are capable of reducing silver chloride are well known to the art, having been extensively studied for use as developing agents. For example, hydroquinones and catechols are well known developing agents as well as p-aminophenols. Thus, those skilled in the art through years of extensive investigation of developing agents have already determined which phenols are and are not capable of reducing silver chloride. According to James The Theory of the Photographic Process, 4th Ed., Macmillan, New York, 1977, Chapter 11, D. Classical Organic Developing Agents, 1. RELATION BETWEEN DEVELOPING ACTION AND CHEMICAL STRUCTURE, compounds that satisfy the following structure are developing agents: ##STR1## where, in the case of a phenol, a is hydroxy, a' is hydroxy or amino (including primary, secondary or tertiary amino), and n=1, 2 or 4.
From the foregoing it is apparent that the overwhelming majority of phenol substituents in addition to the required hydroxy and iodo substituents are incapable of rendering the phenols reducing agents for silver chloride. Such additional substituents, hereinafter referred to as photographically inactive substituents, include, but are not limited to, the following common classes of substituents for phenols: alkyl, cycloalkyl, alkenyl (e.g., allyl), alkoxy, aminoalkyl, aryl, aryloxy, acyl, halo (i.e., F, Cl or Br), nitro (NO.sub.2), and carboxy or sulfo (including the free acid, salt or ester). All aliphatic moieties of the above substituents preferably contain from 1 to 6 carbon atoms while all aryl moieties preferably contain from 6 to 10 carbon atoms. When the phenol contains two iodo substituents and an additional, photographically inactive substituent, the latter is preferably located para to the hydroxy group on the benzene ring.
It has been demonstrated that phenols contain two or three iodo substituents are highly effective as grain growth modifiers, but that phenols with a single iodo substituent are ineffective. This was not predicted and is, in fact, quite unexpected.
There are, of course, many varied phenols known to the art that are available for selection as grain growth modifiers in the practice of the invention. The following are specific illustrations of polyiodophenol grain growth modifiers contemplated for use in the practice of the invention: ##STR2##
An aqueous gelatino-peptizer dispersing medium is present during precipitation. Gelatino-peptizers include gelatin--e.g., alkali-treated gelatin (cattle bone and hide gelatin) or acid-treated gelatin (pigskin gelatin) and gelatin derivatives--e.g., acetylated gelatin, phthalated gelatin, and the like.
The process of the invention is not restricted to use with gelatino-peptizers of any particular methionine content. That is, gelatino-peptizers with all naturally occurring methionine levels are useful. It is, of course, possible, though not required, to reduce or eliminate methionine, as taught by Maskasky U.S. Pat. No. 4,713,323 or King et al U.S. Pat. No. 4,942,120, here incorporated by reference.
During the precipitation of photographic silver halide emulsions there is always a stoichiometric excess of halide ion present. This avoids the possibility of excess silver ion being reduced to metallic silver and resulting in photographic fog. The teaching of Maskasky U.S. Pat. No. 4,713,323 to maintain a chloride concentration during precipitation of at least 0.5M can be applied to the process of the invention, but it is a significant advantage of this invention that the stoichiometric excess of chloride ion in the dispersing medium can be maintained at a level of less than 0.5M while still obtaining a high aspect ratio tabular grain emulsion. It is generally preferred that the chloride ion concentration in the dispersing medium be less than 0.4M and, optimally, equal to or less than 0.25M.
The advantages of limiting the stoichiometric excess of chloride ion present in the reaction vessel during precipitation include (a) reduction of corrosion of the equipment (the reaction vessel, the stirring mechanism, the feed jets, etc.), (b) reduced consumption of chloride ion, (c) reduced washing of the emulsion after preparation, and (d) reduced chloride ion in effluent. It has also been observed that reduction in the chloride ion excess contributes to obtaining thinner tabular grains.
The grain growth modifiers of the invention are effective over a wide range of pH levels conventionally employed during the precipitation of silver halide emulsions. It is contemplated to maintain the dispersing medium within conventional pH ranges for silver halide precipitation, typically from 1.5 to 10, while the tabular grains are being formed, with a pH range of 2 to 7 being in most instances preferred. Within these pH ranges optimum performance of individual grain growth modifiers can be observed as a function of their specific structure. A strong mineral acid, such as nitric acid or sulfuric acid, or a strong mineral base, such as an alkali hydroxide, can be employed to adjust pH within a selected range. When a basic pH is to be maintained, it is preferred not to employ ammonium hydroxide, since it has the unwanted effect of acting as a ripening agent and is known to thicken tabular grains. However, it is possible to precipitate by the process of the invention high chloride {111} tabular grain emulsions in the presence of ammonium hydroxide or other conventional ripening agents (e.g., thioether or thiocyanate ripening agents) while limiting average tabular grain thicknesses to less than 0.3 .mu.m.
Any convenient conventional approach of monitoring and maintaining replicable pH profiles during repeated precipitations can be employed (e.g., refer to Research Disclosure Item 308,119, cited below). Maintaining a pH buffer in the dispersing medium during precipitation arrests pH fluctuations and facilitates maintenance of pH within selected limited ranges. Exemplary useful buffers for maintaining relatively narrow pH limits within the ranges noted above include sodium or potassium acetate, phosphate, oxalate and phthalate as well as tris(hydroxy-methyl)aminomethane.
In forming high chloride {111} tabular grain emulsions, the emulsions are in one preferred form high aspect ratio tabular grain emulsions. That is, the high chloride {111} tabular grains accounting for at least 50 percent of total grain projected area and having a thickness of less than 0.3 .mu.m exhibit an average aspect ratio of greater than 8. Aspect ratio is the ratio of tabular grain equivalent circular diameter (ECD) and thickness (t). In another preferred form the {111} tabular grain emulsions can be thin, intermediate aspect ratio emulsions. That is, the high chloride {111} tabular grains accounting for at least 50 percent of total grain projected area and having a thickness of less than 0.2 .mu.m exhibit an average aspect ratio of from 5 to 8.
A particularly preferred class of tabular grain emulsions are "ultrathin" tabular grain emulsions-- that is, tabular grain emulsions that have an average tabular grain thickness of less than 0.07 .mu.m. They are particularly suited for use in color photographic elements, particularly in minus blue recording layers, because the of their efficient utilization of silver, attractive speed-granularity relationships, and high levels of image sharpness, both in the emulsion layer and in underlying emulsion layers. A characteristic of ultrathin tabular grain emulsions that sets them apart from other tabular grain emulsions is that they do not exhibit reflection maxima within the visible spectrum, as is recognized to be characteristic of tabular grains having thicknesses in the 0.18 to 0.08 .mu.m range, as taught by Buhr et al, Research Disclosure, Vol. 253, Item 25330,May 1985. Research Disclosure is published by Kenneth Mason Publications, Ltd., Dudley House, 12 North St., Emsworth, Hampshire P010 7DQ, England. In multilayer photographic elements overlying emulsion layers with mean tabular grain thicknesses in the 0.18 to 0.08 .mu.m range require care in selection, since their reflection properties differ widely within the visible spectrum. The choice of ultrathin tabular grain emulsions in building multilayer photographic elements eliminates spectral reflectance dictated choices of different mean grain thicknesses in the various emulsion layers overlying other emulsion layers. Hence, the use of ultrathin tabular grain emulsions not only allows improvements in photographic performance, it also offers the advantage of simplifying the construction of multilayer photographic elements.
Generally photographic emulsions can exhibit average ECD's ranging up to 10 .mu.m, although for most photographic applications average ECD's of less than 5 .mu.m are preferred. The Examples demonstrate average grain thicknesses of substantially less than 0.2 .mu.m. Since the precipitation process of the invention allows tabular grain growth with limited thickening of the tabular grains once formed, it is apparent that very high average aspect ratios well in excess of 100 are possible. For most photographic applications preferred average aspect ratios are in the range of from greater than 8 to 50.
The advantages of tabular grain emulsions stem not only from their average aspect ratios, but also from their relatively limited thicknesses. Therefore, another common definition of preferred tabular grain emulsions is in terms of their tabularity. Preferred emulsions prepared by the process of the invention exhibit high tabularity. A tabular grain emulsion exhibits high tabularity when
ECD.div.t.sup.2 >25
where ECD and t are both average values measured in micrometers (.mu.m). This relationship can also be expressed as follows:
AR.div.t>25
where AR is average aspect ratio and t is average tabular grain thickness measured in .mu.m.
It is, of course, preferred to maximize the proportion of total grain projected area accounted for by {111} tabular grains. It is generally preferred to obtain {111} tabular grain projected areas of at least 70 percent and optimally at least 90 percent of total grain projected area.
For tabular grains to satisfy the projected area requirement it is necessary first to induce twinning in the grains as they are being formed, since only grains having two or more parallel twin planes will assume a tabular form. Second, to realize favorably average aspect ratios or tabularities after twinning has occurred, it is necessary to restrain precipitation onto the major {111} crystal faces of the tabular grains, since this has the effect of thickening the grains. The polyiodophenol grain growth modifiers of this invention are effective during precipitation to facilitate tabular grain formation by twinning to satisfy tabular grain projected area requirements and to facilitate limited tabular grain growth to achieve preferred tabular grain thicknesses, average aspect ratios and tabularities.
Instead of employing only a polyiodophenol grain growth modifier of this invention to perform each of the twinning and tabular grain thickness control functions, it is possible to employ another, conventional growth modifier to perform one of these two functions or to supplement the polyiodophenol grain growth modifier in performing one or both of these functions.
It is specifically contemplated to employ in combination with the polyiodophenol grain growth modifiers of this invention an organic grain growth modifier chosen from among the aromatic N-heterocyclic grain growth modifiers disclosed by Maskasky U.S. Pat. No. 4,400,463,Maskasky U.S. Pat. No. 4,713,323, Tufano et al U.S. Pat. No. 4,804,621,Maskasky U.S. Pat. No. 5,178,997,Maskasky et al U.S. Pat. No. 5,178,998 and Maskasky U.S. Pat. No. 5,185,239; a dicationic bipyridinium salt, such as described by Marimoto U.S. Pat. No. 4,983,508; or a sulfur containing organic grain growth modifier of the type disclosed by Takada et al U.S. Pat. No. 4,783,398 and Nishikawa et al U.S. Pat. No. 4,952,491; the disclosures of each of these patents being here incorporated by reference.
It is generally recognized that introducing twin planes in the grains at a very early stage in their formation offers the capability of producing thinner tabular grains than can be achieved when twinning is delayed. For this reason it is usually preferred that the conditions within the dispersing medium prior to silver ion introduction at the outset of precipitation be chosen to favor twin plane formation. To facilitate twin plane formation it is contemplated to incorporate a grain growth modifier in the dispersing medium prior to silver ion addition. When one of the conventional organic grain growth modifiers are relied upon exclusively for twin plane formation, a conventional concentration level, taught in the patents cited above, can be employed. When the polyiodophenol is employed as the sole grain growth modifier during twin plane formation, useful concentrations are demonstrated in the Examples below. When the polyiodophenol and a conventional grain growth modifier are employed in concentration during twin plane formation, proportionate weightings of their concentrations can be undertaken.
The maximum concentration of many conventional grain growth modifiers in the dispersing medium is often limited by their solubilities. Fortunately, the polyiodophenol grain growth modifiers of this invention can contain solubilizing substituents that remove solubility as a factor in selecting maximum concentrations. Another approach is to add the grain growth modifier as a solid dispersion. This has the advantage of providing a source capable of continuously releasing grain growth modifier into solution as grain surface area increases during precipitation.
Once a stable multiply twinned grain population has been formed within the dispersing medium, the primary, if not exclusive, function the grain growth modifier is called upon to perform is to restrain precipitation onto the major {111} crystal faces of the tabular grains, thereby retarding thickness growth of the tabular grains. In a well controlled tabular grain emulsion precipitation, once a stable population of multiply twinned grains has been produced, tabular grain thicknesses can be held essentially constant.
The amount of grain growth modifier required to control thickness growth of the tabular grain population is a function of the total grain surface area. By adsorption onto the {111} surfaces of the tabular grains the grain growth modifier restrains precipitation onto the grain faces and shifts further growth of the tabular grains to their edges.
The benefits of this invention can be realized using any amount of grain growth modifier that is effective to retard thickness growth of the tabular grains. It is generally contemplated to have present in the emulsion during tabular grain growth sufficient grain growth modifier to provide a monomolecular adsorbed layer over at least 25 percent, preferably at least 50 percent, of the total {111} grain surface area of the emulsion grains. Higher amounts of adsorbed grain growth modifier are, of course, feasible. Adsorbed grain growth modifier coverages of 80 percent of monomolecular layer coverage or even 100 percent are contemplated. In terms of tabular grain thickness control there is no significant advantage to be gained by increasing grain growth modifier coverages above these levels. Any excess grain growth modifier that remains unadsorbed is normally depleted in post-precipitation emulsion washing.
Prior to introducing silver salt into the dispersing medium at the outset of the precipitation process, no grains are present in the dispersing medium, and the initial grain growth modifier concentrations in the dispersing medium are therefore more than adequate to provide initially the monomolecular coverage levels noted above. As tabular grain growth progresses it is a simple matter to add grain growth modifier, as needed, to maintain monomolecular coverages at desired levels, based on knowledge of amount of silver ion added and the geometrical forms of the grains being grown. If grain growth modifier has been initially added in excess of its solubility limit, undissolved grain growth modifier can enter solution as additional dispersing medium is introduced during grain growth. This can reduce or even eliminate any need to add grain growth modifier to the reaction vessel as grain growth progresses.
Since silver bromide and silver iodide are markedly less soluble than silver chloride, it is appreciated that bromide and/or iodide ions, if introduced into the dispersing medium, are incorporated into the grains in preference to the chloride ions. The inclusion of bromide ions in even small amounts has been observed to improve the tabularities of the emulsions. Bromide ion concentrations of up to 50 mole percent, based on total silver are contemplated, but to increase the advantages of high chloride concentrations it is preferred to limit the presence of other halides so that chloride accounts for at least 80 mole percent, based on silver, of the completed emulsion. Iodide can be also incorporated into the grains as they are being formed in concentrations of up to 5 mole percent, based on silver, but it is preferred to limit iodide concentrations to 2 mole percent or less based on total silver. Thus, the process of the invention is capable of producing high chloride tabular grain emulsions in which the tabular grains consist essentially of silver chloride, silver bromochloride, silver iodochloride, silver iodobromochloride or silver bromoiodochloride, where the halides are designated in order of ascending concentrations.
Either single-jet or double-jet precipitation techniques can be employed in the practice of the invention, although the latter is preferred. Grain nucleation can occur before or instantaneously following the addition of silver ion to the dispersing medium. While sustained or periodic subsequent nucleation is possible, to avoid polydispersity and reduction of tabularity, once a stable grain population has been produced in the reaction vessel, it is preferred to precipitate additional silver halide onto the existing grain population.
In one approach silver ion is first introduced into the dispersing medium as an aqueous solution, such as a silver nitrate solution, resulting in instantaneous grain nuclei formation followed immediately by addition of the growth modifier to induce twinning and tabular grain growth. Another approach is to introduce silver ion into the dispersing medium as preformed seed grains, typically as a Lippmann emulsion having an average grain ECD of less than 0.05 .mu.m. A small fraction of the Lippmann grains serve as deposition sites while the remaining Lippmann grains dissociate into silver and halide ions that precipitate onto grain nuclei surfaces. Techniques for using small, preformed silver halide grains as a feedstock for emulsion precipitation are illustrated by Mignot U.S. Pat. No. 4,334,012, Saito U.S. Pat. No. 4,301,241, Solberg et al U.S. Pat. No. 4,433,048 and Antoniades et al U.S. Pat. No. 5,250,403, the disclosures of which are here incorporated by reference. In still another approach, immediately following silver halide seed grain formation within or introduction into a reaction vessel, a separate step is provided to allow the initially formed grain nuclei to ripen. During the ripening step the proportion of untwinned grains can be reduced, thereby increasing the tabular grain content of the final emulsion. Also, the thickness and diameter dispersities of the final tabular grain population can be reduced by the ripening step. Ripening can be performed by stopping the flow of reactants while maintaining initial conditions within the reaction vessel or increasing the ripening rate by adjusting pH, the chloride ion concentration, and/or increasing the temperature of the dispersing medium. The pH, chloride ion concentration and grain growth modifier selections described above for precipitation can be first satisfied from the outset of silver ion precipitation or during the ripening step.
Except for the distinguishing features discussed above, precipitation according to the invention can take any convenient conventional form, such as disclosed in Research Disclosure Vol. 225, January 1983, Item 22534, and Vol. 308, December 1989, Item 308,119 (particularly Section I) and Maskasky U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,400,463 and 4,713,323, the disclosures of which are here incorporated by reference. It is typical practice to incorporate from about 20 to 80 percent of the total dispersing medium into the reaction vessel prior to nucleation. At the very outset of nucleation a peptizer is not essential, but it is usually most convenient and practical to place peptizer in the reaction vessel prior to nucleation. Peptizer concentrations of from about 0.2 to 10 (preferably 0.2 to 6) percent, based on the total weight of the contents of the reaction vessel are typical, with additional peptizer and other vehicles typically be added to emulsions after they are prepared to facilitate coating.
Once the nucleation and growth steps have been performed the emulsions can be applied to photographic applications following conventional practices. The emulsions can be used as formed or further modified or blended to satisfy particular photographic aims. It is possible, for example, to practice the process of this invention and then to continue grain growth under conditions that degrade the tabularity of the grains and/or alter their halide content. It is also common practice to blend emulsions once formed with emulsions having differing grain compositions, grain shapes and/or tabular grain thicknesses and/or aspect ratios.

EXAMPLES
The invention can be better appreciated by reference to the following examples.
EXAMPLE 1
AgCl Tabular Grain Emulsion Made Using 1.1 mmole/Ag mole of GGM-2
To a stirred reaction vessel containing 400 mL of a solution at pH 6.0 and at 60.degree. C. that was 2 % by weight in bone gelatin (.apprxeq.55 micromoles methionine per gram of gelatin) that was 0.040M in NaCl and 0.20M in sodium acetate was added 0.20 g of GGM-2 dissolved in 4 mL of methanol as the grain growth modifier. Then a 4M AgNO.sub.3 solution and a 4.1M NaCl solution were added. The AgNO.sub.3 solution was added at 0.2 mL/min. for 2 min.; then its flow rate was linearly accelerated to 2.5 mL/min. during 20 min. and maintained at this rate until a total of 0.40 mole of silver had been added. The NaCl solution was added at a similar rate as needed to maintain a constant pCl of 1.5. The pH was maintained at 6.0.+-.0.2 with a dilute NaOH solution.
The resulting high chloride {111} tabular grain emulsion contained a tabular grain population with an average diameter of 1.1 .mu.m, an average thickness of 0.08 .mu.m, an average aspect ratio of 14 and an average tabularity of 175. The {111} tabular grains accounted for 80% of that of the total grain projected area.
EXAMPLE 2
AgCl Tabular Grain Emulsion Made Using 0.54 mmole/Ag mole of GGM-2
This example was prepared similarly to that of Example 1, except that 0.10 g of GGM-2 dissolved in 2 mL of methanol was added as the grain growth modifier.
The resulting high chloride {111} tabular grain emulsion contained a tabular grain population with an average diameter of 1.1 .mu.m, an average thickness of 0.15 .mu.m, an average aspect ratio of 7.3 and an average tabularity of 48.7. The {111} tabular grains accounted for approximately 80% of total grain projected area.
EXAMPLE 3
AgCl Ultrathin Tabular Grain Emulsion Made Using 2.16 mmole/Ag mole of GGM-2
This example was prepared similarly to that of Example 1, except that 0.40 g of GGM-2 dissolved in 8 mL of methanol was added as the grain growth modifier.
The resulting high chloride {111} tabular grain emulsion contained a tabular grain population with an average diameter of 1.2 .mu.m, an average thickness of 0.05 .mu.m, an average aspect ratio of 24 and an average tabularity of 480. The {111} tabular grains accounted for approximately 90% of total grain projected area. The exceptionally low average thicknesses of the tabular grains placed the emulsion in the ultrathin (<0.07 .mu.m) tabular grain category.
EXAMPLE 4
AgCl Ultrathin Tabular Grain Emulsion Made Using 3.19 mmole/Ag mole of GGM-2
This example was prepared similarly to that of Example 3, except that the precipitation was stopped after 0.27 mole of silver had been added.
The resulting ultrathin tabular grain emulsion contained a tabular grain population with an average diameter of 1.1 .mu.m, an average thickness of 0.04 .mu.m, an average aspect ratio of 28 and an average tabularity of 700. The {111} tabular grains accounted for approximately 90% of total grain projected area. Again, the emulsion was an ultrathin tabular grain emulsion.
EXAMPLE 5
AgCl Tabular Grain Emulsion Made Using 1.5 mmole/Ag mole of GGM-3
To a stirred reaction vessel containing 400 mL of a solution at pH 2.0 and at 60.degree. C. that was 1% in oxidized bone gelatin (<5 micromoles methionine per gram of gelatin), and 0.040M in NaCl, was added 0.158 g of GGM-3 dissolved in 3 mL of methanol as the grain growth modifier. Then a 4M AgNO.sub.3 solution and a 4.1M NaCl solution were added. The AgNO.sub.3 solution was added at 0.2 mL/min. for 2 min. then its flow rate was linearly accelerated to 2.5 mL/min. during 20 min. and maintained at this rate until a total of 0.27 mole of silver had been added. The NaCl solution was added at a similar rate as needed to maintain a constant pCl of 1.5. The pH remained in the range of 2.0.+-.0.2 without adjustment.
The resulting high chloride {111} tabular grain emulsion contained a {111} tabular grain population with an average diameter of 2.1 .mu.m, an average thickness of 0.10 .mu.m, an average aspect ratio of 21 and an average tabularity of 210. The {111} tabular grains accounted for approximately 80% of total grain projected area.
EXAMPLE 6
AgBrCl (0.5 mole % Br) Tabular Grain Emulsion Made Using 3.0 mmole/Ag mole of GGM-11
To a stirred reaction vessel containing 400 mL of a solution at pH 6.0 and at 60.degree. C. that was 1% in oxidized bone gelatin, 0.128M in NaCl was added 0.28 g of GGM-11 dissolved in 5 mL of ammonium hydroxide as the grain growth modifier. Then a 2M AgNO.sub.3 solution and a 2.3M NaCl solution were added for 0.5 min. at 5.0 mL/min. The additions were stopped for 10 min. Then the AgNO.sub.3 solution was added at 0.40 mL/min. for 1 min., after which time its flow rate was linearly accelerated to 5.0 mL/min. during 30 min. and maintained at this rate until a total of 0.20 mole of silver had been added. The NaCl solution was added at a similar rate as needed to maintain a constant pCl of 0.89. The pH was maintained at 6.0.+-.0.2 with a dilute NaOH solution.
The resulting high chloride {111} tabular grain emulsion contained a {111} tabular grain population with an average diameter of 2.1 .mu.m, an average thickness of 0.09 .mu.m, an average aspect ratio of 23 and an average tabularity of 256. The {111} tabular grains accounted for approximately 65% of that of the total grain projected area.
EXAMPLE 7
AgBrCl (10.7 mole % Br) Tabular Grain Emulsion Made Using 1.0 mmole/Ag mole of GGM-12
To a stirred reaction vessel containing 400 mL of a solution at pH 6.0 and at 60.degree. C. that was 1% in oxidized bone gelatin, 0.125M in NaCl and 2.5 mM in NaBr, was added 0.176 g of GGM-12 dissolved in 19 mL of water as the grain growth modifier. Then a 2M AgNO.sub.3 solution and a solution 2.0M in NaCl and 0.20M in NaBr were added for 0.5 min. at 5.0 mL/min. Then the additions were stopped and the temperature was increased to 75.degree. C. at a rate of 5.degree. C. per 3 min. After 10 min. at 75.degree. C., the AgNO.sub.3 solution addition was started at 0.40 mL/min. for 1 min. then its flow rate was linearly accelerated to 5.0 mL/min. during 30 min. and maintained at this rate until a total of 0.15 mole of silver had been added. The NaCl-NaBr solution was added at a similar rate as needed to maintain a constant pCl of 0.90. The pH was maintained at 6.0.+-.0.2 with a dilute NaOH solution.
The resulting high chloride {111} tabular grain emulsion contained a {111} tabular grain population with an average diameter of 0.9 .mu.m, an average thickness of 0.13 .mu.m, an average aspect ratio of 6.9 and an average tabularity of 53. The {111} tabular grain population accounted for approximately 55% of the total grain projected area.
EXAMPLE 8
AgCl Ultrathin Tabular Grain Emulsion Made Using 6.0 mmole/Ag mole of GGM-2
This example was prepared similarly to that of Example 1, except that 0.764 g of GGM-2 dissolved in 15 mL of methanol was added as the grain growth modifier.
The resulting high chloride {111} tabular grain emulsion contained a {111} tabular grain population with an average diameter of 1.2 .mu.m, an average thickness of 0.04 .mu.m, an average aspect ratio of 30 and an average tabularity of 750. The {111} tabular grains accounted for approximately 80% of total grain projected area. The emulsion was an ultrathin tabular grain emulsion.
Comparative Examples 9 to 19 Inclusive
These emulsions were prepared similarly to the one described in Example 8, except that the solution of GGM-2 was replaced by a solution of the compound to be tested in an amount given in Table I below. Also, the reaction vessel was adjusted and maintained throughout the precipitation at the pH shown in Table I. The results are presented in Table I.
TABLE I______________________________________ G.G.M. Major Level Emulsion Compound Tested as (mmole/ GrainEmulsion Grain Growth Modifier Ag mole) pH Population______________________________________Example 8 2,4,6-triiodophenol 6.0 6.0 tabularComp. 2-iodophenol 6.0 6.0 cubicEx. 9Comp. 4-iodophenol 6.0 6.0 cubicEx. 10Comp. 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid 6.0 6.0 cubicEx. 11Comp. 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid 6.0 3.0 cubicEx. 12Comp. 3,5-diiodoanthranilic 6.0 6.0 cubic*Ex. 13 acidComp. 3,5-diiodoanthranilic 6.0 2.0 cubicEx. 14 acidComp. 3,5-diiodo-4-pyridone-1- 6.0 6.0 cubicEx. 15 acetic acidComp. 3,5-diiodo-4-pyridone-1- 2.0 6.0 cubicEx. 16 acetic acidComp. 3,5-diiodo-4-pyridone-1- 2.0 2.0 cubicEx. 17 acetic acidComp. 2,4,6-tribromophenol 6.0 6.0 cubicEx 18Comp. 2,4,6-trinitrophenol 6.0 6.0 cubicEx. 19 (picric acid)______________________________________ *{110} faces were also observed on the cubic grains
Only the 2,4,6-triiodophenol (GGM-2), Example 8, produced a high chloride {111} tabular grain emulsion. The remaining compounds of Table I tested for utility as grain growth modifiers either lacked two iodo substituents or where not phenols (i.e., lacked the required hydroxy substituent). The tribromo analogue of GGM-2 was ineffective as a grain growth modifier. In each of the comparative Examples the compound tested did not produce a {111} tabular grain emulsion, the majority the grains having {100} crystal faces and the majority of grains being cubic.
The invention has been described in detail with particular reference to preferred embodiments thereof, but it will be understood that variations and modifications can be effected within the spirit and scope of the invention.

Number	Name	Date
3982947	Pollet et al.	Sep 1976
4400463	Maskasky	Aug 1983
4713323	Maskasky	Dec 1987
4783398	Takada et al.	Nov 1988
4804621	Tufano et al.	Feb 1989
4952491	Nishikawa et al.	Aug 1990
4983508	Ishiguro et al.	Jan 1991
5178997	Maskasky	Jan 1993
5178998	Maskasky et al.	Jan 1993
5185239	Maskasky	Feb 1993
5298387	Maskasky	Mar 1994

Class of grain growth modifiers for the preparation of high chloride (111) tabular grain emulsions (II)

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

US Classifications

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

US Referenced Citations (11)