Claims
- 1. An imaging element comprising:
- a support;
- an image forming layer superposed on the support; and
- an electrically conducting layer comprising:
- a smectite clay;
- a first polymeric binder which sufficiently intercalates inside or exfoliates said smectite clay; and
- a second polymeric binder which does not sufficiently intercalate inside or exfoliate said smectite clay.
- 2. The imaging element of claim 1, wherein said smectite clay comprises a synthetic hectorite clay.
- 3. The imaging element of claim 2, wherein said synthetic hectorite clay comprises a layered hydrous magnesium silicate.
- 4. The imaging element of claim 1, wherein said first polymeric binder is selected from the group consisting of poly vinyl alcohols, poly ethylene oxides, polyacrylamides, polystyrene sulfonates, hydrophilic colloids, polymers of styrene, polymers of styrene derivatives, interpolymers of styrene, interpolymers of styrene derivatives, alkyl acrylates, alkyl methacrylates, derivatives of alkyl acrylates, derivatives of alkyl methacrylates, olefins, acrylonitriles, polyurethanes and polyester ionomers.
- 5. The imaging element of claim 1, wherein said second polymeric binder is selected from the group consisting water soluble polymers, acrylics, styrenes, acrylonitriles, vinyl halides, butadienes, polyurethanes, polyesters, polyamides, and epoxides.
- 6. The imaging element of claim 1, wherein said support is selected from the group consisting of cellulose nitrate films, cellulose acetate films, poly(vinyl acetal) films, polystyrene films, poly(ethylene terephthalate) films, poly(ethylene naphthalate) films, polycarbonate films, glass, metals, papers and polymer-coated paper.
- 7. The imaging element of claim 1, wherein said electrically conducting layer further comprises a crosslinking agent.
- 8. The imaging element of claim 1, wherein said electrically conducting layer further comprises a surfactant.
- 9. The imaging element of claim 1, wherein said electrically conductive layer comprises 20 to 80 weight % of the smectite clay, 2 to 20 weight % of the first polymeric binder, and 20 to 80 weight % of the second polymeric binder.
- 10. The imaging element of claim 1 wherein a basal plane spacing of the smectite clay increases by at least 50 percent when the smectite clay first polymeric binder weight ratio is changed from 100:0 to 30:70.
Parent Case Info
This application relates to commonly assigned copending application Ser. No. 08/937,685, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,891,611 Express Mail No. EM031050112US, filed simultaneously herewith and hereby incorporated by reference for all that it discloses. This application relates to commonly assigned copending application Ser. No. 08/939,515, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,955,190 Express Mail No. EM031050090US, filed simultaneously herewith and hereby incorporated by reference for all that it discloses.
US Referenced Citations (19)
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number |
Date |
Country |
0 250 154 |
Dec 1987 |
EPX |
0 301 827 B1 |
Feb 1989 |
EPX |
Non-Patent Literature Citations (4)
Entry |
T. Lan, "Mechanism of Clay Tactoid Exfoliation in Epoxy-Clay Nanocomposites", Chem. Mater, 1995, 7, 2144-2150. |
Research Disclosure 38957, Sep. 1996, pp. 591-639. |
Research Disclosure 36544, Sep. 1994, pp. 501-541. |
Research Disclosure 37038, Feb. 1995, pp. 79-116. |