1. Field of the Invention
Embodiments described herein generally relate to the planarization of substrates. More particularly, the embodiments described herein relate to the conditioning of polishing pads.
2. Description of the Related Art
Sub-quarter micron multi-level metallization is one of the key technologies for the next generation of ultra large-scale integration (ULSI). The multilevel interconnects that lie at the heart of this technology require planarization of interconnect features formed in high aspect ratio apertures, including contacts, vias, trenches and other features. Reliable formation of these interconnect features is very important to the success of ULSI and to the continued effort to increase circuit density and quality on individual substrates and die.
Multilevel interconnects are formed using sequential material deposition and material removal techniques on a substrate surface to form features therein. As layers of materials are sequentially deposited and removed, the uppermost surface of the substrate may become non-planar across its surface and require planarization prior to further processing. Planarization or “polishing” is a process in which material is removed from the surface of the substrate to form a generally even, planar surface. Planarization is useful in removing excess deposited material, removing undesired surface topography, and surface defects, such as surface roughness, agglomerated materials, crystal lattice damage, scratches, and contaminated layers or materials to provide an even surface for subsequent photolithography and other semiconductor manufacturing processes.
Chemical Mechanical Planarization, or Chemical Mechanical Polishing (CMP), is a common technique used to planarize substrates. CMP utilizes a chemical composition, such as slurries or other fluid medium, for selective removal of materials from substrates. In conventional CMP techniques, a substrate carrier or polishing head is mounted on a carrier assembly and positioned in contact with a polishing pad in a CMP apparatus. The carrier assembly provides a controllable pressure to the substrate, thereby pressing the substrate against the polishing pad. The pad is moved relative to the substrate by an external driving force. The CMP apparatus affects polishing or rubbing movements between the surface of the substrate and the polishing pad while dispersing a polishing composition to affect chemical activities and/or mechanical activities and consequential removal of materials from the surface of the substrate.
The polishing pad performing this removal of material must have the appropriate mechanical properties for substrate planarization while minimizing the generation of defects in the substrate during polishing. Such defects may be scratches in the substrate surface caused by raised areas of the pad or by polishing by-products disposed on the surface of the pad, such as accumulation of conductive material removed from the substrate precipitating out of the electrolyte solution, abraded portions of the pad, agglomerations of abrasive particles from polishing slurries, and the like. The polishing potential of the polishing pad generally lessens during polishing due to wear and/or accumulation of polishing by-products on the pad surface, resulting in reduced polishing qualities. This alteration of the polishing pad may occur in a non-uniform or localized pattern across the pad surface, which may promote uneven planarization of the conductive material. Thus, the pad surface must periodically be refreshed, or conditioned, to restore the polishing performance of the pad.
Therefore, there is a need for improved methods and apparatus for conditioning polishing pads.
Embodiments described herein generally relate to the planarization of substrates. More particularly, the embodiments described herein relate to the conditioning of polishing pads. In one embodiment, a method of conditioning a polishing pad is provided. The method comprises contacting a surface of the polishing pad with a conditioning disk, measuring a thickness of the polishing pad while sweeping the conditioning disk across the surface of the polishing pad, comparing the measured thickness of the polishing pad to a standard thickness polishing pad profile, and adjusting a dwell time of the conditioning disk based on the comparison of the measured thickness of the polishing pad to the standard thickness polishing pad profile.
In another embodiment, a method of conditioning a polishing pad is provided. The method comprises conditioning a polishing pad using an initial conditioning recipe while measuring a thickness of the polishing pad using an integrated inductive sensor, wherein the initial conditioning recipe comprises an initial sweep schedule based on an initial dwell time profile, comparing the measured thickness of the polishing pad to an initial pre-polishing pad thickness profile and using the difference to construct a measured pad wear profile, comparing the measured pad wear profile to a target pad wear profile, determining a revised dwell time profile based on the comparison of the measured pad wear profile to a target pad wear profile, developing a revised sweep schedule based on the revised dwell time profile, and adjusting a dwell time of the conditioning disk based on the revised sweep schedule.
So that the manner in which the above recited features of the present invention can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the invention, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to embodiments, some of which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments.
To facilitate understanding, identical reference numerals have been used, where possible, to designate identical elements that are common to the figures. It is contemplated that elements and features of one embodiment may be beneficially incorporated in other embodiments without further recitation.
Embodiments described herein generally provide methods and apparatus for the planarization of substrates. More particularly, the embodiments described herein provide methods and apparatus for the conditioning of polishing pads. Chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) pads require conditioning to maintain the surfaces yielding acceptable performance. However, conditioning not only regenerates the pad surface but also wears away the pad material and slurry transport grooves. Non-acceptable conditioning may result in non-uniform pad profiles, limiting the productive lifetimes of pads. Certain embodiments described herein use closed-loop control (CLC) of conditioning sweep to enable uniform groove depth removal across the pad, throughout pad life. A sensor may be integrated into the conditioning arm to enable in-situ and real-time monitoring of the thickness of the pad stack. Feedback from the thickness sensor may be used to modify pad conditioner dwell times across the pad surface, correcting for drifts in the pad profile that may arise as the pad and disk age. Pad profile CLC enables uniform reduction in groove depth with continued conditioning, providing longer consumables lifetimes and reduced operating costs.
Pad conditioning is used extensively in CMP to maintain acceptable process performance. On-wafer thin film material removal rates (MRR) deteriorate rapidly without periodic pad surface conditioning with an abrasive disk. Appropriate conditioning intervals are also required to maintain acceptable within-wafer non-uniformity (WIWNU) and defectivity throughout the life of a pad or pad set. However, conditioning not only regenerates but also wears away the pad top surface, including grooves used for slurry distribution. The effective lifetime of a pad can be reduced if the grooves are worn away unevenly. Non-acceptable conditioning may result in non-uniform pad profiles that limit the productive lifetimes of pads. Pad profile non-uniformity can have a significant impact on tool operating costs due to consumables replacement and subsequent process re-qualification.
The pad conditioning sweep schedule is one of the most significant factors affecting pad profile non-uniformity. For a rotary polishing tool, the across-platen travel of the conditioning disk is typically divided into radial conditioning zones. The residence time of the conditioning disk within each zone, or dwell time, can be adjusted to yield a desired sweep schedule. Typically, linear and sinusoidal sweep schedules which are fixed are commonly used. However, fixed sweep schedules often fail to correct for process drift and variations in the consumables (e.g., slurry) used.
Models designed to predict dwell time profiles yielding superior within-pad wear profile performance have been tested by measuring the pad stack thickness or groove depth profiles for extensively conditioned pads. Pad thickness profile measurements are not usually performed during polishing operations since they tend to be intrusive and are often destructive in nature. Currently conditioner sweep schedules are static, and once established do not self-adjust in response to process drift.
Embodiments described herein provide a closed-loop control method for correcting within-platen pad wear non-uniformity. A non-contacting sensor integrated into the pad conditioning arm may be used to monitor pad thickness or removal profiles both during active conditioning and independently of conditioning and polishing operations. Feedback from the integrated sensor is sent to an advanced process control (APC) system or controller, which compares the measured pad removal profile to a target removal profile. The APC system then modifies the conditioner dwell times for each zone in the sweep schedule to correct for deviations from the target pad wear profile. The closed-loop control method is expected to be insensitive to differences in disk design, front-side flatness and conditioning wear rate. The method can correct for non-acceptable initial sweep profile settings or for drift in the pad profile that may arise as the pad and disk age, enabling uniform within-pad wear profiles to be maintained throughout pad life. The method can also correct for variability in consumables such as slurries and disk-to-disk and pad-to-pad variation.
While the particular apparatus in which the embodiments described herein can be practiced is not limited, it is particularly beneficial to practice the embodiments in a Reflexion GT™ system, REFLEXION® LK CMP system, and MIRRA MESA® system sold by Applied Materials, Inc., Santa Clara, Calif. Additionally, CMP systems available from other manufacturers may also benefit from embodiments described herein. Embodiments described herein may also be practiced on overhead circular track polishing systems including the overhead track polishing systems described in commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/420,996, titled POLISHING SYSTEM HAVING A TRACK, filed Apr. 9, 2009, now published as US 2009/0258574, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Still referring to
In one embodiment, as depicted in
Each polishing station 124 includes a polishing pad 200 (See
The support assembly 246 is adapted to position the conditioning head 242 in contact with the polishing surface 130, and further is adapted to provide a relative motion therebetween. The conditioning arm 244 has a distal end coupled to the conditioning head 242 and a proximal end coupled to the base 247. The base 247 rotates to sweep the conditioning head 242 across the polishing surface 130 to condition the polishing surface 130. As a result of the relative motion of the conditioning head 242 with respect to the polishing surface 130 of the polishing pad 200, the displacement sensor 260 takes thickness measurements of the polishing surface 130 and the polishing pad 200.
The sensor coupled to the conditioning arm allows a thickness of the polishing pad 200 to be measured at various points during a portion of a normal operation cycle, while the accompanying logic allows the measurement data to be captured and displayed. In some embodiments, the displacement sensor 260 may utilize an inductive sensor.
In embodiments where the displacement sensor 260 is a laser based sensor, the thickness of the polishing pad 200 is measured directly. The conditioning arm 244 is in a fixed position with respect to the platen 240, and the laser is in a fixed position with respect to the arm. Consequently, the laser is in a fixed position with respect to the platen assembly 240. By measuring the distance to the processing pad and calculating the difference between the distance to the polishing pad 200 and the distance to the platen assembly 240, the remaining thickness of the polishing pad 200 may be determined. In some embodiments, the resolution of the thickness measurement using the laser based displacement sensor 260 may be within 25 um.
In embodiments where the displacement sensor 260 is an inductive sensor, the thickness of the polishing pad 200 is measured indirectly. The conditioning arm 244 is actuated around a pivot point until the conditioning head 242 comes in contact with the processing pad 200. An inductive sensor, which emits an electromagnetic field, is mounted to the end of the pivot based conditioning arm 244. In accordance with Faraday's law of induction, the voltage in a closed loop is directly proportional to the change in the magnetic field per change in time. The stronger the applied magnetic field, the greater the eddy currents developed and the greater the opposing field. A signal from the sensor is directly related to the distance from the tip of the sensor to the metallic platen assembly 240. As the platen assembly 240 rotates, the conditioning head 242 rides on the surface of the pad and the inductive sensor rises and falls with the conditioning arm 244 according to the profile of the polishing pad 200. As the inductive sensor gets closer to the metallic platen assembly 240, an indication of processing pad wear, the voltage of the signal increases. The signal from the sensor is processed and captures the variation in the thickness of the polishing pad assembly 200. In some embodiments, the resolution of the thickness measurement using the inductive sensor 260 may be within 1 um.
The conditioning head 242 is also configured to provide a controllable pressure or downforce to controllably press the conditioning head 242 toward the polishing surface 130. In one embodiment, the down force can be in a range between about 0.5 lbf (22.2 N) to about 14 lbf (62.3 N), for example, between about 1 lbf (4.45 N) and about 10 lbf (44.5 N). The conditioning head 242 generally rotates and/or moves laterally in a sweeping motion across the polishing surface 130. In one embodiment, the lateral motion of the conditioning head 242 may be linear or along an arc in a range of about the center of the polishing surface 130 to about the outer edge of the polishing surface 130, such that, in combination with the rotation of the platen assembly 240, the entire polishing surface 130 may be conditioned. The conditioning head 242 may have a further range of motion to move the conditioning head 242 off of the platen assembly 240 when not in use.
The conditioning head 242 is adapted to house a conditioning disk 248 to contact the polishing surface 130. The conditioning disk 248 may be coupled with the conditioning head 242 by passive mechanisms such as magnets and pneumatic actuators that take advantage of the existing up and down motion of the conditioning arm 244. The conditioning disk 248 generally extends beyond the housing of the conditioning head 242 by about 0.2 mm to about 1 mm in order to contact the polishing surface 130. The conditioning disk 248 can be made of nylon, cotton cloth, polymer, or other soft material that will not damage the polishing surface 130. Alternatively, the conditioning disk 248 may be made of a textured polymer or stainless steel having a roughened surface with diamond particles adhered thereto or formed therein. The diamond particles may range in size between about 30 microns to about 100 microns.
To facilitate control of the polishing system 100 and processes performed thereon, a controller 190 comprising a central processing unit (CPU) 192, memory 194, and support circuits 196, is connected to the polishing system 100. The CPU 192 may be one of any form of computer processor that can be used in an industrial setting for controlling various drives and pressures. The memory 194 is connected to the CPU 192. The memory 194, or computer-readable medium, may be one or more of readily available memory such as random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), floppy disk, hard disk, or any other form of digital storage, local or remote. The support circuits 196 are connected to the CPU 192 for supporting the processor in a conventional manner. These circuits include cache, power supplies, clock circuits, input/output circuitry, subsystems, and the like.
At block 320, the measured polishing pad thickness is compared to a standard polishing pad thickness profile, which may be a target value. The standard polishing pad thickness profile may be determined based on a flat removal profile (e.g., the uniform reduction in groove depth of the polishing pad).
At block 330, an adjustment of the dwell time of the conditioning disk is made based on the comparison performed in block 320. The “dwell time” of the conditioning disk is defined as the residence time of the conditioning disk within each conditioning zone. If the measured polishing pad thickness for a particular region of the polishing pad is greater than the standard polishing pad thickness, the dwell time of the conditioning disk will be increased for that particular conditioning zone during a polishing sweep. If the measured polishing pad thickness for a particular conditioning zone of the polishing pad is less than the standard polishing pad thickness, the dwell time of the conditioning disk will be decreased for that particular conditioning zone during the polishing sweep. Conditioning of the polishing surface may take place exclusively while a substrate is being processed (in-situ conditioning), may proceed between processing of substrates (ex-situ conditioning), or may be independent of conditioning. In some embodiments, conditioning may be continuous as substrates are positioned on the apparatus, processed, and removed from the apparatus (mixed conditioning). In other embodiments, conditioning may start before, during, or after polishing, and may end before, during, or after polishing.
The following non-limiting examples are provided to further illustrate embodiments described herein. However, the examples are not intended to be all inclusive and are not intended to limit the scope of the embodiments described herein.
Pad wear studies were conducted on a REFLEXION® LK 300 mm CMP system, available from Applied Materials, Inc. of Santa Clara, Calif., using IC1010 polyurethane pads, available from The Dow Chemical Company, and A165 diamond conditioning disks, available from 3M Corporation. The polisher was modified through the addition of a new pad conditioning arm design that features an integrated, non-contacting thickness sensor (See
Experiments were conducted for conditioning-only (ex-situ conditioning) and conditioning-during-polish cases (in-situ polishing). The pads were wetted with deionized water during conditioning-only runs and SEMI-SPERSE® 12 or SEMI-SPERSE® 25 (diluted 1:1 with deionized water), available from Cabot Corp., was used for the polishing runs. In the latter case, thermally oxidized silicon wafers or quartz disks from Quartz Unlimited were polished using a high removal rate interlevel dielectric (ILD) process with carrier head speeds of 87 rpm and average membrane pressures of 4.5 psi. For all runs, the platen speed was 93 rpm.
The pad conditioner was operated with a head speed of 95 rpm and an applied load of 9 lb (4.08 kg). The sweep rate was 19 sweeps per minute, with a sweep range of 1.7 inches (4.32 cm) to 14.7 inches (37.3 cm) divided into 13 equidistant zones. Pad removal profiles were compared for conditioning with fixed linear sweep schedules run in an open-loop mode (See
Conditioning-Only Runs
IC1010 pads were subjected to more than 10 hours of conditioning in the open-loop, fixed dwell run, and to 22 hours of conditioning under closed-loop control of dwell times. During the conditioning-only runs, DI water was used and there was no substrate contact with the pad. As shown in
The reason for this variation in dwell times is shown in
The useful pad lifetime is defined as the cumulative conditioning time for which the grooves in any region of the pad are worn down to 5 mils of depth remaining (e.g., 25 mils worn away for an initial groove depth of 30 mils). If the pad wear profile is not uniform, the fastest wearing region of the pad limits the useful pad lifetime rather than the average pad wear. As shown in
Conditioning-During-Polishing Runs
Conditioning during polishing yields within-pad removal profiles similar to those observed during conditioning alone. Results are compared for slurry polishing runs (e.g., silica slurry) on thermal oxide substrates or quartz disks, one in open-loop mode and one in closed-loop control mode, both with over 2,000 wafers polished (>20 hours of conditioning time). Again, the initial sweep schedules for the open-loop and closed-loop runs are initially identical and uniform (flat) across all zones (See
Pad wear results for the 2,000-wafer open-loop baseline run are presented in
A comparison of pad profile non-uniformity ranges for the conditioning-only and conditioning during polish extended runs is presented in Table 1. As measured with the pin gauge, groove depth variation was reduced by more than 40% using closed-loop pad profile control. Integrated sensor measurements indicated a profile non-uniformity reduction of greater than 75%.
Embodiments described herein provide a new approach to conditioning using closed-loop control (CLC) of conditioning sweep to enable uniform groove depth removal across the pad, throughout pad life. A non-contact sensor integrated into the conditioning arm enables the pad stack thickness to be monitored in-situ and in real time. Feedback from the thickness sensor is used to modify pad conditioner dwell times for each zone in the sweep schedule, correcting for drifts in the pad profile that may arise as the pad and disk age. Pad profile CLC enables uniform reduction in groove depth with continued conditioning, providing longer consumables lifetimes and reduced operating costs. Using closed-loop pad profile control, groove depth variation was reduced by more than 40% while useful pad life is predicted to increase by 20%.
Although certain embodiments herein are discussed in relation to grooved polishing pads, it should also be understood that the methods described herein are applicable to all non-metallic polishing pads including polishing pads without surface features and polishing pads with surface features (e.g., perforations, embossed surface features, etc.).
While the foregoing is directed to embodiments of the present invention, other and further embodiments of the invention may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof, and the scope thereof is determined by the claims that follow.
This application claims benefit of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/325,986, filed Apr. 20, 2010, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5974679 | Birang et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6040244 | Arai et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6045434 | Fisher, Jr. et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6186864 | Fisher, Jr. et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6488573 | Kobayashi et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6616513 | Osterheld | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6661224 | Linder | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6835116 | Oguri et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6872132 | Elledge et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7070479 | Faustmann et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7128803 | Owczarz et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7195536 | Swedek et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7306506 | Elledge | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7314401 | Chandrasekaran | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7413986 | Paik | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7840305 | Behr et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8043870 | Manens et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8078419 | Kobayashi et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8182709 | Heinrich et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
20030186627 | So | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20060196283 | Yang et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060226123 | Birang | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20090137190 | Togawa et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090191797 | Nabeya et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090280850 | Mathur et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090318060 | Dhandapani et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1979359 | Jun 2007 | CN |
202894742 | Apr 2013 | CN |
103676773 | Mar 2014 | CN |
1063056 | Dec 2000 | EP |
2001129754 | May 2001 | JP |
2009148876 | Jul 2009 | JP |
10-0223953 | Jul 1999 | KR |
10-0286415 | Mar 2001 | KR |
10-2001-0050233 | Jun 2001 | KR |
10-0289985 | Jul 2002 | KR |
10-2007-0115259 | Dec 2007 | KR |
I275451 | Mar 2007 | TW |
200819243 | May 2008 | TW |
WO 9903639 | Jan 1999 | WO |
2009137764 | Nov 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Dec. 9, 2011 in PCT/US2011/032447. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2011/032447 dated Oct. 23, 2012. |
Japanese Office Action for Japanese Application No. 2013-506182 dated Nov. 25, 2014. |
Chinese Office Action (with attached English translation) for Application No. 201180007366.6 dated Feb. 13, 2015; 13 total pages. |
Search Report and Office Action for Taiwan Application No. 100113575 dated Mar. 23, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110256812 A1 | Oct 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61325986 | Apr 2010 | US |