This application is the National Stage of International Application No. PCT/EP2009/051630 filed Feb. 12, 2009, which claims the benefit of EP application number 08153134.5, filed Mar. 20, 2008, and GB application number 0810511.6, filed Jun. 10, 2008, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
This invention relates to a closure. In particular, it relates to the combination of a closure and a container, the container typically including threads. The closure is of the two-part type of closure, which comprises an inner cap or disc part, and a ring or skirt part.
Two-part closures typically comprise a cap or disc which is held onto a container by a skirt, which is sometimes referred to as a ring, or overcap. The two parts may be of the same material, or different materials as in a combination closure or “combo-cap” which uses a metal disc and a plastic skirt. The skirt often defines threads or lugs, which cooperate with complementary features on a container neck. Sealing material is conventionally applied to the disc to form a seal between the disc and the mouth of the container.
There are many examples of two-part closures, of which U.S. Pat. No. 3,446,381 A (PODESTA ET AL) is one of the older examples. That patent describes a two-part metallic cap with a separate disc and “sleeve-like” skirt. Another two-piece metallic cap from the same inventor is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 3,836,033 A (PODESTA). In U.S. Pat. No. 3,836,033 A the disc has an edge portion which projects beyond the container mouth, an annular portion which sits on the top edge of the container mouth and a middle portion covering the opening of the container. The entire middle portion of the disc moves between concave and convex configurations by pivoting of the annular portion about the top edge of the container mouth. Both of these closures can be used for containers such as glass bottles, pots and the like.
It has also been popular to provide screw threads or lugs on the skirt, whether this is of metal or of plastics material. For example, the skirt may be part of a threaded outer cap, as in U.S. Pat. No. 4,473,163 B (ERNST & CO.) in which the outer cap prises the inner cap off the container during unscrewing. This is particularly useful when the closure is used for the packaging of food products, which during processing “pull” a negative pressure, often called a “vacuum”. This vacuum creates a substantial resistance to opening. The two-piece cap of EP 1686070 A (PLATO PRODUCT CONSULTANTS V.O.F.) has a special feature to reduce torque on opening. This feature is similar to a dimple, which during opening, pushes up a disc-shaped inner cap to overcome the forces between jar and closure, which create the sealing of the package.
The 2-piece closure design allows the breaking of the container seal to be controlled. The initial twisting of the skirt is sometimes used to activate a tamper-evident feature, such as breaking a tamper-evident band, whilst the disc remains sealed to the container. Thereafter, a further feature may be provided on the skirt to prise the disc from the container, thereby breaking the seal between the disc and the container to equalise any difference between the internal pressure in the container and the external environment. This 2-stage opening reduces the torque required to open the closure and allows the closure to be removed more easily.
Although known features such as these can reduce the force necessary to break vacuum, there are still problems inherent in the combined opening force requirements of unscrewing and breaking the vacuum. This invention seeks to overcome those problems.
According to the present invention, there is provided a two-part closure comprising a disc and a skirt, in which the disc has a seal and a surrounding rim and is held moveably between an inwardly projecting rim at the upper end of the skirt and an annular inward projection on the skirt wall and/or lugs at the lower end of the skirt wall, the closure being adapted for use with a container and the sum of the distance (B) between the seal and the contact point of the disc rim and lower skirt rim, plus the effective thickness (A) of the lugs is greater than the distance (C) between the top of threads on the container and the top of the container.
The term “disc” is used to define the whole of an inner cap component and is not intended to infer that that component is simply a thin circular component. Preferably, the centre portion of the disc is a substantially flat planar panel and radially outwardly of this panel the disc is profiled for sealing a container to which the closure is attached, as discussed in more detail below.
It is thus possible to manufacture the closure of the invention from fairly stiff material, for example from a single piece of metal (e.g. steel) and as described in WO/2008/053014. In any event, the closure disc is not intended to be overly flexible or moveable from concave to convex and returning to concave as is required in U.S. Pat. No. 3,836,033 A, which is equivalent to FR 2177118.
The effective thickness of the lugs is the axial distance (A) between a position (X), which is the contact point between the lug and the top of the container thread, and a position (Y), which is the contact point of disc rim and skirt rim. The references refer to
The container, which the closure of the invention is suitable to close may be a jar or bottle (of glass or plastics material) or even a metal can. Although a usual use for the closure of the invention would be with a glass jar, the expressions are used interchangeably in this application. The jar generally includes threads but one or more waves, cams or projections may be used in the place of threads. A single continuous thread, as in a rolled-on thread, may also be provided on the jar.
During opening of the closure of the invention, the first stage of torque application to rotate the skirt and release the lug from the underside of the thread is distinctly separate from the second stage which is needed to prise the disc axially away from the container by forcing the lugs between the top of the threads and the underside of the disc rim. There is thus no effort required to slide the seal of the disc part relative to the top of the jar and the disc may audibly jump when the seal is broken on first opening.
The strength of the lugs required to prise the disc from the jar during opening is less than that required for lugs on a conventional twist closure as the lugs of the present invention only have to resist crushing between the thread and the disc and do not have to resist bending. Thinner material may thus be used to form the skirt. Although the disc is typically of metal for optimum barrier properties, for example, the skirt may be a plastics material or metal.
The most preferred embodiment of the invention is an all-metal closure. Of course, if both parts of the closure were made from the same piece of metal, this would result in cost saving, environmental and resources conservation, even if the panels and rings were mixed and matched from the metal sheets or discs from which they were formed. Also, the metal could be decorated, and decoration of skirt (ring) and disc matched for aesthetic purposes for example.
Where the closure is of metal, this is preferably steel. The thickness of steel may be less than that used for the manufacture of vacuum twist closures. Thus the steel used for the closures of the present invention may be less than 0.14 mm for closures of 48 mm nominal diameter and below, less than 0.15 mm for closures of 48 mm nominal diameter and below, less than 0.16 mm for closures of 66 mm nominal diameter and below, less than 0.17 mm for closures of 77 mm nominal diameter and below, less than 0.18 mm for closures of 82 mm nominal diameter and below, and less than 0.20 mm for closures of 110 mm nominal diameter and below. The metal may be a polymer-coated metal.
Generally, the inwardly projecting rim on the top of a metal skirt is curled inwardly to hide the upper cut edge. Not only does this enhance the appearance of the skirt, but it also provides a safe edge. The lower end of the skirt is also usually curled inwardly to obscure the lower cut edge of the skirt and to provide a smooth surface against which to push the rim of the disc part during opening. The rim of a metal disc part is usually curled (inwardly or outwardly) to obscure the cut edge of the disc and the disc part may be sealed or even filled with compound or sealing material. Cut edge protection may be enhanced by conventional processes such as by the use of roller-coated lacquers. Of course it is possible for all cut edges to be coated after cutting.
The radius of curvature of any of the curled regions, either on skirt or disc, is typically no less than 0.4 mm This gives a good appearance and smooth feel, and avoids damage to decoration or protective coatings, which could occur if the curl is too tight, for example.
The inwardly projecting rim on the top end of the skirt part may be discontinuous so that inwardly projecting rim portions are only provided where there is no lug opposite. This simplifies manufacture of the ring, particularly if the ring is made from plastic because ejection from the mould is simpler and insertion of the disc into a more flexible ring is easier.
In one embodiment, the height of the disc rim may vary around its circumference. Another alternative is for the height or thickness of the skirt lugs or adjacent curled regions to vary. In yet another embodiment, the height or thickness of the top of the container threads may vary. Any of these alternatives have the advantage that during the second stage of opening, the force to prise the disc from the top of the container is focussed at one part of the circumference, and so less torque is required.
Either or both of the surfaces of the disc and skirt, which contact one another when the container is closed, may undulate or include protrusions/dimples to provide a gap or gaps between the skirt and disc. This reduces the area, which might stick during handling and any gap or gaps provide ventilation between the skirt and disc. Spaces between skirt, disc and container dry more effectively in these closures after filling and closing a container. Furthermore, accidental movement of the skirt may be avoided and evidence of movement such as opening may be provided. Flexibility of the panel and/or ring allows release of stuck surfaces either individually (disc/ring) or when assembled into closures. Addition of solid or liquid slip material or non-stick coatings may limit application torque and minimise sticking.
For tamper evidence or to avoid accidental movement of the ring, the skirt may be joined to the disc by a breakable material or strap.
When the closure is used to close a container, the top of the skirt in one embodiment is typically a little higher than the top of the disc before the closure is tightened onto the jar, and may flex slightly in combination with the disc to become substantially level when the desired tightness is achieved. Over-tightening of the closure in so-called “top-belt driven cappers” may thus be avoided.
Although the closure of the invention does not require the entire middle portion of the disc to move between concave and convex as described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,836,033, it is common for the middle portion of closures of different types to have a small central bi-stable part or “button” which moves when internal vacuum is released and vice versa. This vacuum button feature may be included in the disc of our invention but it plays no part in any pivoting or in the sealing of the container itself.
Preferred embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the drawings, in which:
a and 14b are perspective views of a closure ring and closure with four inwardly projecting rim portions opposite gaps between lugs;
A retention feature, or features 45 is/are provided to position the disc 30 loosely within the ring 40, whilst allowing the disc 30 freedom to move rotationally relative to the ring 40 and limiting axial movement. The retention feature 45 may take the form of spaced projections around the circumference of the ring 40, or alternatively may be provided by a circumferential bead, either full or segmented. A channel 34 is provided about the inside periphery of the disc 30, surrounding a flat centre panel, and this channel is used to hold sealing material 36. The provision of the channel 34 ensures proper location of the sealing material to interface with the neck of a container 50 and also reduces the quantity of sealing material 36 because of its better and more accurate distribution. A portion of thread 52 is also shown in
The skirt 3 of
This ring below disc configuration has a smooth feel. When the closure is used to close a filled container, there is less risk of scuffing of the ring. For these reasons, this is the most preferred format for the invention. An alternative ring below disc closure may have the disc panel extending outside the top curl of the ring.
When the container is a glass jar which is closed by the ring below disc closure, it is well suited for stacking. The top of the closure may nest with a stacking bead around the bottom rim of the jar above.
In its form independently of any container, the disc 2 is free to move between a lower position when the curl on the disc abuts curl 12 and/or lug 13, and an upper position, as shown, when the disc abuts curl 11. The shoulder 6 of the disc of
Either curl may be inward or outward (reversed), with the ring above or below the panel. The curls may be partly or fully closed, rest on or in features of the disc 2 or ring 3, or other possible variants. In one arrangement, as shown in
Many features of the closures become more clear when closures are used to close a container. Although any screw container could be closed by any closure according to the invention, the drawings of
The relative positions of improved seal 10, underside of disc rim 24 and inwardly projecting lug 13 can be seen in
In the closed position of
Counter-rotation of the ring causes the lugs to move to positions above the adjacent threads and application of further torque causes lifting of the disc and full opening of the closure (see
In the final position of
In order for the seal to be broken, it is necessary for the sum of distances A+B to be greater than distance C. This invention is therefore not applicable to shallow cap-like closures.
An alternative version as shown in
The embodiment of
It is conventional to provide curls where an exposed edge of cut metal might otherwise be dangerous during handling, to obscure edges for cosmetic purposes, or to protect against corrosion.
Although the most preferred embodiments of closure shown in
Other features, which the closure may include, are flats or similar undulations 14 around the disc which form gaps 15 when inserted in skirt 3 (
Although the invention has predominantly been described with reference to an all-metal closure and a glass jar, the scope of the invention is also intended to include changes and modifications to materials etc and numbers of features such as lugs, as defined by the scope of the claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
08153134 | Mar 2008 | EP | regional |
0810511.6 | Jun 2008 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2009/051630 | 2/12/2009 | WO | 00 | 9/16/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/115377 | 9/24/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
470529 | Williams | Mar 1892 | A |
1349837 | Johnson | Aug 1920 | A |
1699069 | Huntar | Jan 1929 | A |
2139682 | Hothersall | Dec 1938 | A |
2166923 | Woodcock | Jul 1939 | A |
2216082 | Kronquest et al. | Sep 1940 | A |
2522301 | Rooney | Sep 1950 | A |
2527885 | Krueger | Oct 1950 | A |
2621622 | Henchert | Dec 1952 | A |
2702597 | Wickwire et al. | Feb 1955 | A |
2975740 | Smith et al. | Mar 1961 | A |
2991602 | Van De Kerke et al. | Jul 1961 | A |
D192757 | Foss et al. | May 1962 | S |
3068344 | Keinanen et al. | Dec 1962 | A |
3124872 | Knodel | Mar 1964 | A |
3157080 | Hanni | Nov 1964 | A |
3186003 | Gregory, Jr. et al. | May 1965 | A |
3380419 | Moloney | Apr 1968 | A |
3446381 | Podesta et al. | May 1969 | A |
3581691 | Ringler | Jun 1971 | A |
3802362 | Daniel et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3813972 | Van Alsburg | Jun 1974 | A |
3836033 | Podesta | Sep 1974 | A |
D240595 | Kress | Jul 1976 | S |
4003324 | Tate et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4004478 | Morgan | Jan 1977 | A |
D244065 | Daenen | Apr 1977 | S |
4022141 | Bartenstein | May 1977 | A |
4030432 | Miller et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4111330 | Jordan | Sep 1978 | A |
RE30746 | Stroobants et al. | Sep 1981 | E |
4299147 | Rogers | Nov 1981 | A |
D266906 | Guerette | Nov 1982 | S |
4473163 | Geiger | Sep 1984 | A |
4487539 | Taylor et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4762579 | Shimizu et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4808053 | Nagai et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4942777 | Fife | Jul 1990 | A |
5014491 | Tsukada et al. | May 1991 | A |
5078564 | Zago | Jan 1992 | A |
5325696 | Jentzsch et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5782599 | Moran et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5785198 | Credle, Jr. | Jul 1998 | A |
5839869 | Moran et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
D480304 | Stodd | Oct 2003 | S |
6662958 | German et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
D489005 | Miceli et al. | Apr 2004 | S |
D522364 | Hicks et al. | Jun 2006 | S |
D526740 | Xu | Aug 2006 | S |
D536975 | Smith et al. | Feb 2007 | S |
7461576 | Dickey | Dec 2008 | B2 |
D612196 | Furlong | Mar 2010 | S |
7731048 | Alvares et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
D628894 | Pontes | Dec 2010 | S |
8393192 | McEldowney et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
20040016758 | Richardson | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20070090111 | Alvares et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20100003109 | Ramsey et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2933547 | Mar 1981 | DE |
3619322 | Dec 1986 | DE |
0092884 | Nov 1983 | EP |
0599549 | Jun 1994 | EP |
1686070 | Aug 2006 | EP |
1918041 | May 2008 | EP |
620920 | May 1927 | FR |
769264 | Aug 1934 | FR |
2177118 | Nov 1973 | FR |
WO 9511104 | Apr 1995 | WO |
WO 2005063587 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2008053014 | May 2008 | WO |
WO 2009060291 | May 2009 | WO |
WO 2009115377 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO 2009130122 | Oct 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 12/988,933, filed Apr. 6, 2009, Dunwoody et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/361,421, filed May 11, 2010, Dunwoody et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/361,422, filed May 11, 2010, Dunwoody et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/361,424, filed May 11, 2010, Dunwoody et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/361,437, filed May 11, 2010, Dunwoody et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/361,441, filed May 11, 2010, Dunwoody et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/361,443, filed May 11, 2010, Dunwoody et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/361,446, filed May 11, 2010, Dunwoody et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/361,448, filed May 11, 2010, Dunwoody et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/361,449, filed May 11, 2010, Dunwoody et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/382,735, filed Jan. 6, 2011, Dunwoody. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/382,739, filed Jan. 6, 2011, Dunwoody. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/382,732, filed Jan. 6, 2011, Dunwoody. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/382,738, filed Jan. 6, 2011, Dunwoody. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/382,744, filed Jan. 6, 2011, Dunwoody. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110011866 A1 | Jan 2011 | US |