CMP pad dresser having leveled tips and associated methods

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8974270
  • Patent Number
    8,974,270
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, May 23, 2012
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 10, 2015
    9 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Examiners
    • Nguyen; George
    Agents
    • Thorpe North & Western LLP
  • CPC
  • US Classifications
    Field of Search
    • US
    • 451 443000
    • 451 444000
    • 451 548000
    • 451 056000
    • 051 295000
    • 051 309000
    • CPC
    • B24B53/12
    • B24B53/017
  • International Classifications
    • B24B53/12
    • H01L21/304
    • Disclaimer
      This patent is subject to a terminal disclaimer.
      Term Extension
      199
Abstract
CMP pad dressers having leveled tips and associated methods are provided. In one aspect, for example, a CMP pad dresser can include a matrix layer and a monolayer of a plurality of superabrasive particles embedded in the matrix layer, where each superabrasive particle in the monolayer protrudes from the matrix layer. The difference in the protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the next highest protruding tip of the monolayer of superabrasive particles is less than or equal to about 20 microns, and the difference in protrusion distance between the highest 1% of the protruding tips of the monolayer of superabrasive particles are within about 80 microns or less.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The semiconductor industry currently spends in excess of one billion U.S. dollars each year manufacturing silicon wafers that must exhibit very flat and smooth surfaces. Known techniques to manufacture smooth and even-surfaced silicon wafers are plentiful. The most common of these involves the process known as Chemical Mechanical Polishing (CMP) which includes the use of a polishing pad in combination with an abrasive slurry. Of central importance in all CMP processes is the attainment of high performance levels in aspects such as uniformity of polished wafer, smoothness of the IC circuitry, removal rate for productivity, longevity of consumables for CMP economics, etc.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present disclosure provides CMP pad dressers and associated methods thereof. In one aspect, for example, a CMP pad dresser can include a matrix layer and a monolayer of a plurality of superabrasive particles embedded in the matrix layer, where each superabrasive particle in the monolayer protrudes from the matrix layer. The difference in the protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the next highest protruding tip of the monolayer of superabrasive particles can be less than or equal to about 20 microns, and the difference in protrusion distance between the highest 1% of the protruding tips of the monolayer of superabrasive particles are within about 80 microns or less. In one specific aspect, a rigid support is coupled to the matrix layer.


In another aspect, the difference in protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the next highest protruding tip of the monolayer of superabrasive particles is less than or equal to about 15 microns. In yet another aspect, the difference in protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the next highest protruding tip of the monolayer of superabrasive particles is less than or equal to about 10 microns. In a further aspect, the difference in protrusion distance between the highest 10 protruding tips of the monolayer of superabrasive particles are within about 30 microns or less. In another aspect, the difference in protrusion distance between the highest 100 protruding tips of the monolayer of superabrasive particles are within about 50 microns or less. In yet another aspect, the difference in protrusion distance between the highest 1% of the protruding tips of the first monolayer of superabrasive particles are within about 50 microns or less. In another aspect, the difference in protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the second highest protruding tip is less than or equal to about 10 microns. In yet another aspect, the difference in protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the 10th highest protruding tip is less than or equal to about 20 microns. In a further aspect, the difference in protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the 100th highest protruding tip is less than or equal to about 40 microns. In another aspect, the highest protruding tip protrudes from the matrix layer to a height greater than or equal to about 50 microns.


In another aspect, a CMP pad dresser is provided. Such a dresser can include a first monolayer of superabrasive particles disposed on one side of a metal support layer and a second monolayer of superabrasive particles disposed on the metal support layer on an opposite side from the first monolayer. The superabrasive particles of the second monolayer are positioned to have substantially the same distribution as the superabrasive particles of the first monolayer, and a rigid support is coupled to the second monolayer of superabrasive particles opposite the first monolayer.


In yet another aspect, a method of making a CMP pad dresser includes disposing a first monolayer of superabrasive particles on a metal support layer and disposing a second monolayer of superabrasive particles on the metal support layer on a side opposite the first monolayer. The superabrasive particles of the second monolayer are positioned to have substantially the same distribution as the superabrasive particles of the first monolayer. The method further includes bonding the first monolayer of superabrasive particles and the second monolayer of superabrasive particles to the metal support layer such that symmetrical forces due to the substantially similar distribution between the first monolayer and the second monolayer precludes substantial warping of the metal support layer. In one aspect, the method can further include coupling the second monolayer of superabrasive particles to a rigid support.


In one aspect, the bonding of at least one of the first monolayer and the second monolayer is by brazing with a braze material. In another aspect, the bonding of at least one of the first monolayer and the second monolayer is under heat and pressure. In one specific aspect, the heat and pressure bonds at least one of the first monolayer and the second monolayer directly to the metal support layer. In another specific aspect, the bonding of at least one of the first monolayer and the second monolayer further includes disposing a sintering compound on the metal support layer in contact with at least one of the first monolayer and the second monolayer and sintering the sintering compound to bond the at least one of the first monolayer and the second monolayer to the metal support layer. In one specific aspect, the method further includes infiltrating the sintering compound with a braze material during bonding.


In yet another aspect, a method of minimizing warpage of a CMP pad dresser during manufacture is provided. Such a method can include substantially equalizing warping forces on opposing sides of a metal support layer during bonding of a plurality of superabrasive particles thereto, wherein warpage of the support layer is minimized during bonding due to the equalized forces on opposing sides. In one aspect, substantially equalizing forces includes arranging the plurality of superabrasive particles on opposing sides of the support layer such that the plurality of superabrasive particles has substantially the same distribution on either side of the support layer to substantially equalize warping forces during bonding.


In a further aspect, a CMP pad dresser is provided. Such a dresser can include a plurality of superabrasive particles arranged as a working surface, wherein the difference in protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the second highest protruding tip is less than or equal to about 10 microns, the difference in protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the 10th highest protruding tip is less than or equal to about 20 microns, the difference in protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the 100th highest protruding tip is less than or equal to about 40 microns, and the highest protruding tip has a protrusion distance of greater than or equal to about 50 microns.


There has thus been outlined, rather broadly, various features of the invention so that the detailed description thereof that follows may be better understood, and so that the present contribution to the art may be better appreciated. Other features of the present invention will become clearer from the following detailed description of the invention, taken with the accompanying claims, or may be learned by the practice of the invention.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a schematic side view of a CMP pad dresser in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 2 is a schematic side view of a CMP pad dresser in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 3 is a schematic side view of a CMP pad dresser in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 4 is a schematic side view of a CMP pad dresser in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; and



FIG. 5 is a schematic side view of a CMP pad dresser in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;





It will be understood that the above figures are merely for illustrative purposes in furthering an understanding of the invention. Further, the figures are not drawn to scale, thus dimensions, particle sizes, and other aspects may, and generally are, exaggerated to make illustrations thereof clearer. Therefore, departure can be made from the specific dimensions and aspects shown in the figures in order to produce the heat spreaders of the present invention.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Before the present invention is disclosed and described, it is to be understood that this invention is not limited to the particular structures, method steps, or materials disclosed herein, but is extended to equivalents thereof as would be recognized by those ordinarily skilled in the relevant arts. It should also be understood that terminology employed herein is used for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting.


It must be noted that, as used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an” and, “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “a diamond particle” includes one or more of such particles and reference to “the layer” includes reference to one or more of such layers.


DEFINITIONS

In describing and claiming the present invention, the following terminology will be used in accordance with the definitions set forth below.


As used herein, the terms “conditioner” and “dresser” can be used interchangeably, and refer to a tool used to condition or dress a pad, such as a CMP pad.


As used herein, “dressing segment” refers to a dressing or conditioning element of a CMP pad dresser. Dressing segments are utilized in the present invention to carry superabrasive particles having leveled tips. Thus superabrasive particles are introduced into a CMP pad dresser by the incorporation of multiple dressing segments. It should be noted that a variety of techniques of attaching the dressing segments to the substrates, and a variety of techniques of attaching the superabrasive particles to the dressing segments, are discussed herein. It is to be understood that all of these various attachment mechanisms can be used interchangeably herein: that is, if a method of attaching a dressing segment to a substrate is discussed herein, the method of attachment discussed can also be used to attach a superabrasive particles to a dressing segment. For any particular CMP pad dresser being discussed, however, it is understood that attachment methods of the superabrasive particles to the dressing segments can differ from, or can be the same as, the method used to attach the dressing segments to the pad conditioner substrate.


As used herein, “superabrasive” may be used to refer to any crystalline, or polycrystalline material, or mixture of such materials which has a Mohr's hardness of about 8 or greater. In some aspects, the Mohr's hardness may be about 9.5 or greater. Such materials include but are not limited to diamond, polycrystalline diamond (PCD), cubic boron nitride (cBN), polycrystalline cubic boron nitride (PcBN), corundum and sapphire, as well as other superabrasive materials known to those skilled in the art. Superabrasive materials may be incorporated into the present invention in a variety of forms including particles, grits, films, layers, pieces, segments, etc. In some cases, the superabrasive materials of the present invention are in the form of polycrystalline superabrasive materials, such as PCD and PcBN materials.


As used herein, “organic material” refers to a semisolid or solid complex or mix of organic compounds. “Organic material layer” and “organic matrix” may be used interchangeably, and refer to a layer or mass of a semisolid or solid complex or mix of organic compounds, including resins, polymers, gums, etc. The organic material can be a polymer or copolymer formed from the polymerization of one or more monomers. In some cases, such organic material can be adhesive.


As used herein, the process of “brazing” is intended to refer to the creation of chemical bonds between the carbon atoms of the superabrasive particles/materials and the braze material. Further, “chemical bond” means a covalent bond, such as a carbide or boride bond, rather than mechanical or weaker inter-atom attractive forces. Thus, when “brazing” is used in connection with superabrasive particles a true chemical bond is being formed. However, when “brazing” is used in connection with metal to metal bonding the term is used in the more traditional sense of a metallurgical bond. Therefore, brazing of a superabrasive segment to a tool body does not necessarily require the presence of a carbide former.


As used herein, “particle” is as used herein in connection with diamond particles, and refers to a particulate form of diamond. Such particles may take a variety of shapes, including round, oblong, square, euhedral, etc., can be either single crystal or polycrystalline, and can have a number of mesh sizes. As is known in the art, “mesh” refers to the number of holes per unit area as in the case of U.S. meshes. All mesh sizes referred to herein are U.S. mesh unless otherwise indicated. Further, mesh sizes are generally understood to indicate an average mesh size of a given collection of particles since each particle within a particular “mesh size” may actually vary over a small distribution of sizes.


As used herein, “sharp portion” means any narrow portion to which a crystal or particle may come, including but not limited to corners, apexes, ridges, edges, obelisks, and other protrusions. In some cases, corners and/or apexes are formed at the convergence of more than two faces of the particle or crystal, or other body, disposed in intersecting planes. In other aspects, edges and/or ridges may be formed at the convergence of two or at least two faces of the particle or crystal, or other body, disposed in intersecting planes. In some aspects, “sharp portion” can include a portion that is broken, chipped, cracked, jagged, and the like. In some aspects, degrees of sharpness can be correlated with the geometric angle formed by the particle, crystal, or other body, at the location in question. In some aspects, an angle of 90 degrees or less can be considered sharp. In other aspects, an angle of 60 degrees or less can be considered sharp. In yet other aspects, and angle of 45 degrees or less, or 30 degrees or less can be considered to be sharp.


As used herein, “peripherally located,” “peripheral location” and the like, mean any particle of a dresser that is located in an area that originates at the leading edge or outer rim of a dresser and extends inwardly towards the center for up to about 90% of the radius of the dresser. In some aspects, the area may extend inwardly from about 20% to 90% of the radius. In other aspects, the area may extend in to about 50% of the radius. In yet another aspect, the area may extend in to about 33% of the radius of a dresser (i.e. 66% away from the center).


As used herein, “working end” refers to an end of a particle which is oriented towards the CMP pad and during a dressing operation makes contact with the pad. Most often the working end of a particle will be distal from a substrate to which the particle is attached.


As used herein, “attitude” means the position or arrangement of a superabrasive particle in relation to a defined surface, such as a substrate to which it is attached, or a CMP pad to which it is to be applied during a work operation. For example, a superabrasive particle can have an attitude that provides a specific portion of the particle in orientation toward a CMP pad.


As used herein, “sintering” refers to the joining of two or more individual particles to form a continuous solid mass. The process of sintering involves the consolidation of particles to at least partially eliminate voids between particles.


The term “metallic” refers to both metals and metalloids. Metals include those compounds typically considered metals found within the transition metals, alkali and alkali earth metals. Examples of metals are Ag, Au, Cu, Al, and Fe. Metalloids include specifically Si, B, Ge, Sb, As, and Te. Metallic materials also include alloys or mixtures that include metallic materials. Such alloys or mixtures may further include additional additives. In the present invention, carbide formers and carbon wetting agents may be included as alloys or mixtures, but are not anticipated to be the only metallic component. Examples of such carbide formers are Sc, Y, Ti, Zr, Hf, V, Nb, Cr, Mo, Mn, Ta, W, and Tc. Examples of carbon wetting agents are Co, Ni, Mn, and Cr.


As used herein, “infiltrating” refers to a situation where a material is heated to its melting point and then flows as a liquid through the interstitial voids between particles.


As used herein, the term “substantially” refers to the complete or nearly complete extent or degree of an action, characteristic, property, state, structure, item, or result. For example, an object that is “substantially” enclosed would mean that the object is either completely enclosed or nearly completely enclosed. The exact allowable degree of deviation from absolute completeness may in some cases depend on the specific context. However, generally speaking the nearness of completion will be so as to have the same overall result as if absolute and total completion were obtained.


The use of “substantially” is equally applicable when used in a negative connotation to refer to the complete or near complete lack of an action, characteristic, property, state, structure, item, or result. For example, a composition that is “substantially free of” particles would either completely lack particles, or so nearly completely lack particles that the effect would be the same as if it completely lacked particles. In other words, a composition that is “substantially free of” an ingredient or element may still actually contain such item as long as there is no measurable effect thereof.


As used herein, the term “about” is used to provide flexibility to a numerical range endpoint by providing that a given value may be “a little above” or “a little below” the endpoint.


As used herein, a plurality of items, structural elements, compositional elements, and/or materials may be presented in a common list for convenience. However, these lists should be construed as though each member of the list is individually identified as a separate and unique member. Thus, no individual member of such list should be construed as a de facto equivalent of any other member of the same list solely based on their presentation in a common group without indications to the contrary.


Concentrations, amounts, and other numerical data may be expressed or presented herein in a range format. It is to be understood that such a range format is used merely for convenience and brevity and thus should be interpreted flexibly to include not only the numerical values explicitly recited as the limits of the range, but also to include all the individual numerical values or sub-ranges encompassed within that range as if each numerical value and sub-range is explicitly recited. As an illustration, a numerical range of “about 1 to about 5” should be interpreted to include not only the explicitly recited values of about 1 to about 5, but also include individual values and sub-ranges within the indicated range. Thus, included in this numerical range are individual values such as 2, 3, and 4 and sub-ranges such as from 1-3, from 2-4, and from 3-5, etc., as well as 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, individually. This same principle applies to ranges reciting only one numerical value as a minimum or a maximum. Furthermore, such an interpretation should apply regardless of the breadth of the range or the characteristics being described.


The Invention


The present disclosure generally provides CMP pad dressers and associated methods that can be utilized in conditioning (e.g., smoothing, polishing, dressing) a CMP pad. Pad conditioners of the present invention can be advantageously utilized, for example, in dressing CMP pads that are used in polishing, finishing or otherwise affecting semiconductor materials. Specifically, the present disclosure concerns CMP pad dressers having superabrasive particles with substantially leveled tips. Traditional CMP pad dresser manufacturing methods, even many of those describing techniques for leveling superabrasive particle tips prior to fixation, generally contain significant variation in tip height across the surface of the dresser. Often, the superabrasive particles are affixed to the CMP pad dresser support in a manner that disrupts any leveling that has occurred. For example, fixation techniques that utilize high heat and/or pressure can cause warping of the dresser support as the dresser cools. Thus, unless steps are taken to avoid such warpage, superabrasive particles are not maintained in their leveled state following cooling of the dresser. This can be particularly problematic with brazing techniques.


Accordingly, minimizing the warpage of the metal support layer can maintain a greater degree of leveling of superabrasive particle tips in the finished tool. When heat and/or pressure are used to make a superabrasive tool, warpage of the metal support layer can cause great variations in tip height level, even for those particles that were leveled prior to heating and/or applying pressure. By distributing the warpage forces equally or substantially equally on both sides of the metal support layer through the arrangement of the superabrasive particles, these forces effectively cancel each other with respect to the degree of warping occurring in the metal support layer, thus also minimizing the relative height movement of the superabrasive particles relative to one another.


The present CMP pad dressers include a layer of superabrasive particles having substantially leveled tips across the working surface of the finished CMP pad dresser. A variety of techniques can be utilized to maintain tip leveling, and any such technique is considered to be within the present scope. A few non-limiting examples of such techniques are described below.


In one aspect, as is shown in FIG. 1, a CMP pad dresser 10 includes a monolayer of a plurality of superabrasive particles 12 embedded in a matrix layer 14, such that each superabrasive particle in the monolayer protrudes from the matrix layer. The difference in protrusion distance 16 between the highest protruding tip 17 and the next highest protruding tip 18 of the monolayer of superabrasive particles is less than or equal to about 20 microns. In some aspects, the protrusion difference may be less than or equal to about 50 microns. Additionally, the difference in protrusion distance between the highest 1% of the protruding tips of the first monolayer of superabrasive particles are within about 80 microns or less. In other words, for the 1% of the plurality of superabrasive particles that have the highest protruding tips, the variance in protrusion distance for that 1% is less than or equal to about 80 microns. Thus, the two highest protruding superabrasive particle tips protrude to within about 20 microns or less of each other, and in addition, the highest protruding 1% of superabrasive particle tips protrude to within about 80 microns or less of each other. In another aspect, the difference in protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the next highest protruding tip of the monolayer of superabrasive particles is less than or equal to about 15 microns. In yet another aspect, the difference in protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the next highest protruding tip of the monolayer of superabrasive particles is less than or equal to about 10 microns. In a further aspect, the difference in protrusion distance between the highest 1% of the protruding tips of the first monolayer of superabrasive particles are within about 70 microns or less. In yet another aspect, the difference in protrusion distance between the highest 1% of the protruding tips of the first monolayer of superabrasive particles are within about 50 microns or less. In another aspect, and in addition to the protrusion variance of the highest two protruding tips, the difference in protrusion distance between the highest 10 protruding tips of the monolayer of superabrasive particles are within about 30 microns or less. In yet another aspect, the difference in protrusion distance between the highest 100 protruding tips of the monolayer of superabrasive particles are within about 50 microns or less. Additionally, in one aspect, the rigid support can be coupled to the matrix layer (not shown).


In another aspect, the difference in protrusion distance the difference in protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the second highest protruding tip is less than or equal to about 10 microns. In yet another aspect, the difference in protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the 10th highest protruding tip is less than or equal to about 20 microns. In a further aspect, the difference in protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the 100th highest protruding tip is less than or equal to about 40 microns. In yet a further aspect, the highest protruding tip protrudes from the matrix layer to a height greater than or equal to about 50 microns. In another aspect, the highest protruding tip has a protrusion distance of greater than or equal to about 50 microns.


It is noted that the recited protrusion distances can include a distribution across the entire monolayer surface or a discrete area or segment of the monolayer. For example, the highest 1% of protruding tips can be located around the periphery of the monolayer. In another example, discrete regions of leveled superabrasive particle tips can be located within a larger area of superabrasive particles having a lower protrusion distance than the leveled portion. It is also contemplated that the monolayer can include multiple regions or segments of superabrasive particles that are leveled as described, within a larger area of superabrasive particles having a lower protrusion distance.


Various methods can be utilized to measure superabrasive particle tip height to determine the difference in protrusion distance between tips. As such, any method for making such a determination is considered to be within the present scope. It should be noted that for the purposes of the present disclosure, the term “protrusion” refers to the height of a particle relative to some reference point. Techniques for such measurements can include direct measurements of the tip heights relative to a reference point such as, for example, the highest particle tip, a surface of a rigid support, the bottom surface of the matrix, etc. Measurements of particle height from the surface of the matrix material can be problematic, however, due to the irregular nature of such materials due to wicking around the superabrasive particles. In those cases whereby the matrix material is uniform, such a surface may be used to determine particle height. Additionally, a relative protrusion or height difference between two particles would be the difference in the heights between these particles measured from a common reference point. Furthermore, in some cases the superabrasive particles may lie along a slope, curvature, or some other arrangement that is not parallel to the metal support layer. In these cases, the protrusion height would be normalized against the slope, curvature, or other arrangement so that the relative protrusion height difference between particles can be measured in the absence of the slope, curvature, etc. It should be noted that superabrasive particle tip height leveling can, in some cases, be independent from the positioning or patterning of the superabrasive particles across the surface of the dresser.


One example of a direct measurement technique can include an optical scanning process to evaluate superabrasive particle tip positions. In one such process, an optical scanner can scan the surface of the CMP pad dresser to determine the height of the superabrasive particle tips relative to a fixed point. For example, the scanner can scan downward in space toward the dresser until the highest tip is located. The highest tip can then be set to the reference point, and the scanner can continue scanning in a direction toward the dresser measuring the distance from the reference point to each superabrasive particle tip across the surface of the dresser. Accordingly, the difference in protrusion distance between all of the superabrasive particles across the dresser can be directly measured.


Furthermore, measurement techniques can also include indirect measurements, such as, for example, applying the diamond monolayer to a deformable substrate that deforms relative to the protrusion distance of the particle tips. The diamond monolayer can be pressed into the deformable substrate and/or moved across the deformable substrate to form a scratch pattern therein. Tip height can thus be extrapolated from such indirect measurements.


A variety of materials are contemplated for use as superabrasive particles. Any superabrasive known that can be utilized in a CMP pad dresser should be considered to be within the present scope. Non-limiting examples of such materials include diamond materials, nitride materials, ceramics, and the like. In one aspect, the superabrasive particles include diamond materials. Such diamond materials can include natural or synthetic diamond, single crystal, polycrystalline, and the like. In another aspect, the superabrasive particles include cubic boron nitride materials. Additionally, various diamond particles sizes can be used, including mesh sizes such as 10/20, 30/40, 80/90, 90/100, 100/120, 120/140, 140/170, 170/200, 200/230, 230/270, 270/325, and 325/400.


Additionally, the plurality the superabrasive particles can be oriented so as to affect dressing performance of a CMP pad. Orienting the superabrasive particles in a specific attitude in relation to the CMP pad to be dressed creates different asperities in the pad surface, thus altering the performance of the CMP pad. Different asperities retain slurry in different manners and thus polish a workpiece differently according to asperity depth, width, density, etc. The superabrasive particles of a CMP pad dresser can be oriented according to the desired polishing characteristics of the CMP pad. For example, if the superabrasive particles predominantly have an apex oriented towards the CMP pad, the asperities of the pad will be narrow and deep. The advantages of narrow and deep asperities are that the pad can better retain the polishing slurry, and thus the polishing rate of the wafer increases. However, the increased polishing rate may also increase the wear rate of the superabrasive particles. As such, wear rate may vary depending on the attitude of the superabrasive particles, and therefore, the orientation of each superabrasive particle may be considered when designing a device with desired performance characteristics. Generally speaking, superabrasive particle attitudes that provide higher dressing rates (i.e. deeper penetration into a pad) also wear particles out at a higher rate.


In contrast, if the superabrasive particles are oriented with a face towards the pad, the resulting asperities may polish at a lower rate. The face of the particle is generally thought to be more durable, but does not typically cut deep and narrow asperities in the pad, but rather asperities that are shallow and broad. Therefore the face portion of a particle will dress a CMP pad at a reduced rate compared to the apex portion of a particle, but the superabrasive particle will wear at a much lower rate.


The edge portions of a superabrasive particle have dressing and wear characteristics that are between those of the face and apex portions. It has been thought that if the edge portion is utilized to dress a CMP pad, the asperities are not as deep or narrow as those dressed with an apex portion, but may provide asperities having desirable intermediate characteristics. Further, the edge portion of the particle does not wear at such a high rate as that of an apex.


In one aspect, the plurality of superabrasive particles are substantially all configured in an attitude having either an apex portion oriented toward a pad to be dressed. In another aspect, the plurality of superabrasive particles are substantially all configured in an attitude having either an edge portion oriented toward a pad to be dressed. In yet another aspect, the plurality of superabrasive particles can be configured in an attitude having a sharp portion oriented towards a pad to be dressed.


A CMP pad dresser having such substantially leveled tip arrangements can have a low scratch rate because superabrasive particles are less likely to pull out of the matrix layer due to their more uniform protrusion distribution compared to traditional dressers. Additionally, the more uniform protrusion distributions of such a dressers allows the conditioning of CMP pads in such a manner as to facilitate good polishing rates while at the same time extending the effective working life of the dresser. These benefits can be affected by, for example, uniform asperity spacing and size distribution in the CMP pad.


In one aspect of the present disclosure, superabrasive tip leveling can be accomplished by manufacturing the CMP pad dresser in such a way that the effects of warpage are minimized. For example, in one aspect a CMP pad dresser can be made in at least a two stage process, where the first stage is performed in a manner that minimizes perturbations of the leveled tips in a process that would normally significantly move the superabrasive tips out of a leveled arrangement, such as, for example, by brazing. The second stage of the process can further enhance the leveling of superabrasive particle tips across the CMP pad dresser.


Various exemplary configurations of CMP pad dressers having substantially leveled tips are contemplated. In one aspect, for example, a CMP pad dresser can include a first monolayer of superabrasive particles disposed on one side of a metal support layer and a second monolayer of superabrasive particles disposed on the metal support layer on an opposite side from the first monolayer. The superabrasive particles of the second monolayer are positioned to have substantially the same distribution as the superabrasive particles of the first monolayer. A rigid support is coupled to the second monolayer of superabrasive particles opposite the first monolayer to provide support to the dresser.


As is shown in FIG. 2, a first monolayer of superabrasive particles 22 is arranged on a surface of a metal support layer 24. A second monolayer of superabrasive particles 26 is arranged on the metal support layer 24 on a side that is opposite to the first monolayer. As is discussed further below, in some cases the first and second monolayers of superabrasive particles can be arranged such that corresponding superabrasive particles across the metal support layer are in substantial alignment, as is shown in FIG. 2. In other cases, the superabrasive particles of the first and second monolayers can be arranged in a substantially similar distribution, but may or may not be substantially aligned with one another across the metal support layer.


The metal support layer can be any material capable of supporting the diamond monolayer during tool formation. Such materials can include, without limitation, metal materials, metal alloy materials, braze alloy materials, ceramic materials, composites, and the like.


In one aspect, the superabrasive particles can be arranged into a predetermined pattern. Such a pattern can be a uniformly distributed pattern or a non-uniformly distributed pattern. Additionally, a variety of techniques are contemplated to facilitate the arrangement of superabrasive particles into a predetermined pattern. Predetermined is understood to mean a non-random pattern that has been determined prior to arranging the superabrasive particles. In one aspect, a predetermined pattern can also apply to a predetermined spacing between particles. Non-limiting examples of such techniques include arrangement by a template, arrangement using spots of adhesives, arrangement on a first substrate followed by a pattern specific transfer from the first substrate to the metal support layer, and the like, including combinations thereof. The superabrasive particles from either of the monolayers can be temporarily held in position in the predetermined pattern using a variety of techniques, including, without limitation, adhesives, dimpled locations on the metal support matrix, a supporting compound such as, for example, a wax, and the like, including combinations thereof. In one specific aspect, the superabrasive particles can be temporarily coupled to the metal support layer using an adhesive that then volatilizes away and is eliminated during construction of the dresser.


In one aspect, the predetermined pattern can be a uniformly distributed grid. In another aspect, the predetermined pattern can be an annular configuration having a central region devoid of superabrasive particles. In one specific aspect, the annular configuration can include an annular ring. In another specific aspect, the annular configuration can include a portion of an annular ring. In yet another aspect, an annular configuration can include one or more concentric annular rings nested inside one another. In other aspects, the monolayer distribution can be discrete radial regions, spiral regions, and the like.


The disposition of a monolayer of superabrasive particles on each side of the metal layer thus moderates the thermal shrinkage from the brazing temperature that would otherwise buckle a distribution of superabrasive particles arranged on just one side. By applying a monolayer to each side of the metal support layer, warping forces such as thermal movement and pressure can be equalized or substantially equalized on both sides. As such, the warpage of the metal support layer can be minimized. In other words, the forces responsible for warping are applied substantially equally to each side of the metal layer and can thus at least partially cancel one another out, thus minimizing warpage that can otherwise occur. In some aspects, the superabrasive particles making up the monolayers on each side of the metal layer can have matching configurations, patterns, or orientations to one another. In this way there can be a substantially matching spatial arrangement of superabrasive particles on each side of the metal layer. In another aspect, the configurations, patterns, or orientations can be different or varied from one another, or may be partially matching. In yet another aspect, the patterned placement of the superabrasive particles on one side of the metal support layer can be substantially aligned with the pattern of superabrasive particles on the other side of the metal layer so that particle locations match one another. In some aspects, there can be a direct correspondence between the spatial positioning of superabrasive particles on one side of the metal support layer and the spatial positioning of superabrasive particles on the other side of the metal support layer. In another aspect, the patterns of superabrasive particles may match or substantially match one another, but may be offset on opposite sides of the metal support layer so that particle locations do not match one another.


In another aspect, as is shown in FIG. 3, a first monolayer of superabrasive particles 32 is arranged on a surface of a metal support layer 34. A second monolayer of superabrasive particles 36 is arranged on the metal support layer 34 on a side that is opposite to the first monolayer. A bonding material 38 secures the first monolayer and the second monolayer to the metal support layer 34. The bonding material can be any material capable of securing the first and second monolayer to the metal support layer. In some aspect, the bonding material can be the same for securing the first monolayer and the second monolayer, while in other aspects, the bonding material can be different for securing the first monolayer and the second monolayer.


The bonding material can be any material capable of securing superabrasive particles therein. Non-limiting examples of bonding materials include metal brazes, metal braze alloys, organic matrix materials, sintered materials, electroplated materials, and the like, including combinations thereof.


In one aspect, for example, the superabrasive particles can be brazed to the metal support layer, and thus the bonding material can be a metal braze or metal braze alloy. Metal brazing techniques are known in the art. A green braze material can be applied to the metal support layer on or around the superabrasive particles. The metal braze can be applied in any know configuration, including braze sheets, powders, pastes, sprays, and the like, including combinations thereof. Once applied to the metal support layer, the braze can be heated and melted to coat at least a portion of the metal support layer and to bond the superabrasive particles. The heating temperature can vary depending on the braze material used, but in one aspect can be from about 700° C. to about 1200° C. The superabrasive particles in the first and second monolayer are thus arranged such that thermal forces exerted on the metal support layer during heating and cooling are substantially equalize in order to minimize warping.


In one non-limiting example, the superabrasive particles can be bonded to the metal support layer by brazing with a nickel-based alloy containing chromium. In another example, the brazing can include pressing the superabrasive particles with a flat ceramic material that cannot be bonded to the braze in order to level the superabrasive particle tips. Various braze alloys are contemplated, including non-limiting examples such as BNi2, BNi7, and the like.


Additionally, in one aspect at least one of the first and second monolayers of superabrasive particles can be coupled to the metal support layer by an electrodeposition process, and thus the bonding material can be an electrodeposited metal material. As an example of a suitable method for positioning and retaining abrasive materials prior to and during the electrodeposition process, a mold can be used that includes an insulating material that can effectively prevent the accumulation of electrodeposited material on the molding surface. Superabrasive particles can be held on the molding surface of the mold during electro deposition. As such, the accumulation of electrodeposited material can be prevented from occurring on the particle tips and the working surface of the pad conditioner substrate. Such techniques are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/292,938, filed Dec. 2, 2005, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.


In another aspect, the superabrasive particles can be bonded to the metal support layer by sintering, and thus the bonding material can include a sintering material. For example, the bonding of the superabrasive particles to the metal support layer can include disposing a sintering compound on the metal support layer in contact with at least one of the first monolayer and the second monolayer and sintering the sintering compound to bond the at least one of the first monolayer and the second monolayer to the metal support layer. Suitable sintering methods will be readily appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art having possession of this disclosure. Basically, a sintering compound is applied around the superabrasive particles and in contact with the metal support layer. The sintering compound can be any known sintering material that can be used to secure superabrasive particles to a substrate. Non-limiting examples of such materials can include metal and metal alloy powders, ceramic powders, and the like. One specific non-limiting example of a sintering compound is cobalt powder.


Once the sintering compound has been applied around the superabrasive particles and to the metal support substrate, heat and in some cases pressure can be applied to cause sintering to occur. In some aspects, a braze or braze alloy can be infiltrated into the sintering compound during bonding to further strengthen the bonding material matrix.


In another aspect, as is shown in FIG. 4, heat and pressure can be applied to bond the first monolayer of superabrasive particles 42 and/or the second monolayer of superabrasive particles 46 directly into the metal support layer 44. Thus, upon the application of heat and pressure, the metal support layer 44 is softened or partially melted. The superabrasive particles in one or more of the monolayers are then pressed into the metal support layer. A planar leveling surface can be used to apply pressure to the monolayer and thus maintain the level nature of the superabrasive particle tips as the superabrasive particles are pressed into the metal support layer. Upon cooling, the distribution of superabrasive particles on either side of the metal support layer at least partially equalizes the thermal forces acting on the metal support layer, thus minimizing warping.


In yet another aspect, as is shown in FIG. 5, a CMP pad dresser can include a first monolayer of superabrasive particles 52 and a second monolayer of superabrasive particles 56 coupled to a metal support layer 54. The superabrasive particles can be coupled to the metal support layer directly or via a bonding material. The second monolayer of superabrasive particles 56 is coupled to a rigid support 58. A portion of the rigid support 58 is shown removed in FIG. 5 to expose the second monolayer. The rigid support 58 can facilitate handling and use of the CMP pad dresser. By bonding the superabrasive particles of the second monolayer to the rigid support, the first monolayer of superabrasive particles remains exposed for CMP pad conditioning operations.


The rigid support can be made from any material compatible with the abrading or dressing process. Such materials can include polymeric materials, metal materials, ceramic materials, glasses, composites, and the like. In one aspect, the rigid support can be a polymeric material and the second monolayer of superabrasive particles can be embedded therein using heat, pressure, adhesives, etc. In some aspects, the rigid support can be a non-polymeric material such as a metal layer. In such cases, the superabrasive particles can be bonded to the rigid support by adhesive attachment, soldering, brazing, electroplating, and the like. For brazing techniques, care can be taken to minimize or eliminate warpage in the metal layer during the heating and cooling process. In another aspect, one or more magnetic elements can be placed into the rigid support to attract and hold the CMP pad dresser in place, thus forming a temporary attachment. An optional locking mechanism can be utilized to further immobilize the CMP pad dresser to the rigid support during use. In some aspects the rigid support can include surface features to hold the dresser in place during rotational movement against a CMP pad. The rigid support can have approximately the same diameter as the metal support layer, a larger diameter than the metal support layer, or, in some cases, a smaller diameter than the metal support layer.


In another aspect, a CMP pad dresser can be comprised of a plurality of dressing segments having a plurality of leveled superabrasive particles tips, where the plurality of dressing segments are held in place by a rigid support. Such a design allows a plurality of smaller dressing segments to be manufactured having precisely leveled tips. Smaller diameter metal support layers in these dressing segments can be made by processes involving heat and/or pressure with less warpage due to their smaller size. For example, a 4 inch diameter metal disc can exhibit greater warping due to brazing as compared to a 0.5 inch diameter metal disc. Thus thermal distortion and particle floating problems are decreased. A plurality of such dressing segments can then be coupled to a larger diameter rigid support by processes that do not introduce significant warpage, such as bonding in an organic material. Such dressing segments can have one or more layer(s) of superabrasive particles coupled to a support layer. In one aspect, a segment can have a single layer of superabrasive particles coupled to a metal support layer. In another aspect, a segment can have a layer of superabrasive particles coupled to each side of a metal support layer, as has been described herein. Thus, this process allows the manufacture of CMP pad dressers that can have precise tip protrusion tolerances. Additionally, in one aspect, each dressing segment can have at least three superabrasive particles that protrude to the greatest extent. If the three highest protruding superabrasive particles on every dressing segment are leveled across the entire rigid support, a CMP pad dresser is made having very precise tip leveling across the entire surface. If, for example, ten dressing segments are used to make the CMP pad dresser, then the highest protruding thirty superabrasive particles in the tool will have effectively the same protrusion distance and be substantially leveled. Various additional details regarding dressing segments are detailed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/034,213, filed Feb. 24, 2011, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.


Various organic materials are contemplated for use as a rigid support and/or to be used to secure the second monolayer of superabrasive particles and/or the dressing segments to the rigid support. Examples of suitable organic matrix materials include, without limitation, amino resins, acrylate resins, alkyd resins, polyester resins, polyamide resins, polyimide resins, polyurethane resins, phenolic resins, phenolic/latex resins, epoxy resins, isocyanate resins, isocyanurate resins, polysiloxane resins, reactive vinyl resins, polyethylene resins, polypropylene resins, polystyrene resins, phenoxy resins, perylene resins, polysulfone resins, acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene resins, acrylic resins, polycarbonate resins, polyimide resins, and mixtures thereof. In one specific aspect, the organic material can be an epoxy resin. In another aspect, the organic material can be a polyimide resin. In yet another aspect, the organic material can be a polyurethane resin.


Additionally, so-called “reverse casting” methods can be used to accurately orient and attach the dressing segments to the rigid support. Such methods can include initially securing the plurality of dressing segments to a substrate using a “mask” material. The portions of the dressing segments protruding from the mask material can then be attached to the rigid support using the methods discussed herein, after which (or during which), the masking material can be removed.


When an organic material is utilized, methods of curing the organic material can be a variety of processes known to one skilled in the art that cause a phase transition in the organic material from at least a pliable state to at least a rigid state. Curing can occur, without limitation, by exposing the organic material to energy in the form of heat, electromagnetic radiation, such as ultraviolet, infrared, and microwave radiation, particle bombardment, such as an electron beam, organic catalysts, inorganic catalysts, or any other curing method known to one skilled in the art.


In one aspect of the present invention, the organic material can be a thermoplastic material. Thermoplastic materials can be reversibly hardened and softened by cooling and heating respectively. In another aspect, the organic material layer may be a thermosetting material. Thermosetting materials cannot be reversibly hardened and softened as with the thermoplastic materials. In other words, once curing has occurred, the process can be essentially irreversible, if desired.


As a more detailed list of what is described above, organic materials that may be useful in embodiments of the present invention include, but are not limited to: amino resins including alkylated urea-formaldehyde resins, melamine-formaldehyde resins, and alkylated benzoguanamine-formaldehyde resins; acrylate resins including vinyl acrylates, acrylated epoxies, acrylated urethanes, acrylated polyesters, acrylated acrylics, acrylated polyethers, vinyl ethers, acrylated oils, acrylated silicons, and associated methacrylates; alkyd resins such as urethane alkyd resins; polyester resins; polyamide resins; polyimide resins; reactive urethane resins; polyurethane resins; phenolic resins such as resole and novolac resins; phenolic/latex resins; epoxy resins such as bisphenol epoxy resins; isocyanate resins; isocyanurate resins; polysiloxane resins including alkylalkoxysilane resins; reactive vinyl resins; resins marketed under the Bakelite™ trade name, including polyethylene resins, polypropylene resins, epoxy resins, phenolic resins, polystyrene resins, phenoxy resins, perylene resins, polysulfone resins, ethylene copolymer resins, acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) resins, acrylic resins, and vinyl resins; acrylic resins; polycarbonate resins; and mixtures and combinations thereof. In one aspect of the present invention, the organic material may be an epoxy resin. In another aspect, the organic material may be a polyimide resin. In yet another aspect, the organic material may be a polyurethane resin.


Numerous additives may be included in the organic material to facilitate its use. For example, additional crosslinking agents and fillers may be used to improve the cured characteristics of the organic material layer. Additionally, solvents may be utilized to alter the characteristics of the organic material in the uncured state. Also, a reinforcing material may be disposed within at least a portion of the solidified organic material layer. Such reinforcing material may function to increase the strength of the organic material layer, and thus further improve the retention of the individual abrasive segments. In one aspect, the reinforcing material may include ceramics, metals, or combinations thereof. Examples of ceramics include alumina, aluminum carbide, silica, silicon carbide, zirconia, zirconium carbide, and mixtures thereof.


Additionally, in one aspect a coupling agent or an organometallic compound may be coated onto the surface of a superabrasive material to facilitate the retention of the superabrasive particles in the organic material via chemical bonding. A wide variety of organic and organometallic compounds is known to those of ordinary skill in the art and may be used. Organometallic coupling agents can form chemicals bonds between the superabrasive materials and the organic material, thus increasing the retention of the superabrasive materials therein. In this way, the organometallic coupling agent can serve as a bridge to form bonds between the organic material and the surface of the superabrasive material. In one aspect of the present invention, the organometallic coupling agent can be a titanate, zirconate, silane, or mixture thereof. The amount of organometallic coupling agent used can depend upon the coupling agent and on the surface area of the superabrasive material. Oftentimes, 0.05% to 10% by weight of the organic material layer can be sufficient.


Specific non-limiting examples of silanes suitable for use in the present invention include: 3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxy silane (available from Dow Corning as Z-6040); γ-methacryloxy propyltrimethoxy silane (available from Union Carbide Chemicals Company as A-174); β-(3,4-epoxycyclohexyl)ethyltrimethoxy silane, γ-aminopropyltriethoxy silane, N-(β-aminoethyl)-γ-aminopropylmethyldimethoxy silane (available from Union Carbide, Shin-etsu Kagaku Kogyo K.K., etc.). Specific non-limiting examples of titanate coupling agents include: isopropyltriisostearoyl titanate, di(cumylphenylate)oxyacetate titanate, 4-aminobenzenesulfonyldodecylbenzenesulfonyl titanate, tetraoctylbis(ditridecylphosphite) titanate, isopropyltri(N-ethylamino-ethylamino) titanate (available from Kenrich Petrochemicals. Inc.), neoalkyoxy titanates such as LICA-01, LICA-09, LICA-28, LICA-44 and LICA-97 (also available from Kenrich), and the like. Specific non-limiting examples of aluminum coupling agents include acetoalkoxy aluminum diisopropylate (available from Ajinomoto K.K.), and the like. Specific non-limiting examples of zirconate coupling agents include: neoalkoxy zirconates, LZ-01, LZ-09, LZ-12, LZ-38, LZ-44, LZ-97 (all available from Kenrich Petrochemicals, Inc.), and the like. Other known organometallic coupling agents, e.g., thiolate based compounds, can be used in the present invention and are considered within the scope of the present invention.


In other aspects of the present disclosure, superabrasive particle tips can be leveled by reducing the protrusions of particles that are outside of the desired tolerance range. Once such particles are identified, various techniques can be utilized to reduce such protrusions. In one aspect, for example, mechanical abrasion of the dresser can reduce the protruding particles. In another aspect, a vibration tool can be used to individually break such particles. In yet another aspect, a laser such as a Nd:YAG laser can be used to disrupt such particles.


In another aspect of the present disclosure, a method of making a CMP pad dresser can include disposing a first monolayer of superabrasive particles on a metal support layer, and disposing a second monolayer of superabrasive particles on the metal support layer on a side opposite the first monolayer. The superabrasive particles of the second monolayer are positioned to have substantially the same distribution as the superabrasive particles of the first monolayer. The method can further include bonding the first monolayer of superabrasive particles and the second monolayer of superabrasive particles to the metal support layer such that symmetrical forces due to the substantially similar distribution between the first monolayer and the second monolayer precludes substantial warping of the metal support layer.


In yet another aspect, disposing at least one of the first monolayer of superabrasive particles or the second monolayer of superabrasive particles can include adhering a plurality of superabrasive particles to an adhesive transfer sheet in a predetermined pattern established by apertures in a template, and removing the template from the adhesive transfer sheet such that the plurality of superabrasive particles remain adhered to the adhesive transfer sheet in the predetermined pattern. The plurality of superabrasive particles is then transferred with the adhesive transfer sheet to the metal support layer, and the adhesive transfer sheet is removed from the plurality of superabrasive particles to form at least one of the first monolayer of superabrasive particles or the second monolayer of superabrasive particles.


In a further aspect of the present disclosure, a method of minimizing warpage of a CMP pad dresser during manufacture can include substantially equalizing warping forces on opposing sides of a metal support layer during bonding of a plurality of superabrasive particles thereto, wherein warpage of the support layer is minimized during bonding due to the equalized forces on opposing sides. In one aspect, substantially equalizing forces includes arranging the plurality of superabrasive particles on opposing sides of the support layer such that the plurality of superabrasive particles has substantially the same distribution on either side of the support layer to substantially equalize warping forces during bonding.


In yet a further aspect of the present disclosure, a CMP pad dresser can include a plurality of superabrasive particles arranged as a working surface, where the difference in protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the second highest protruding tip of the first monolayer of superabrasive particles is less than or equal to about 20 microns, and where the difference in protrusion distance between the highest 1% of the protruding tips of the first monolayer of superabrasive particles, excluding the highest protruding tip, are within about 80 microns.


In another aspect, a CMP pad dresser can include a plurality of superabrasive particles arranged as a working surface, where the difference in protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the second highest protruding tip is less than or equal to about 10 microns, the difference in protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the 10th highest protruding tip is less than or equal to about 20 microns, the difference in protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the 100th highest protruding tip is less than or equal to about 40 microns, and the highest protruding tip has a protrusion distance of greater than or equal to about 50 microns.


It is noted that, while the above disclosure refers primarily to CMP pad dressers, other precision grinding and/or abrading tools are considered to be within the present scope. As such, the techniques and teaching disclosed herein can additionally be applied to such tools.


Additionally, it is noted that traditional CMP processing techniques, including pad dressing, has limited the critical dimension of integrated circuits. The presently disclosed CMP dressing devices and techniques can, however, allows processing of wafers having integrated circuit critical dimensions of less than or equal to 45 nm, 32 nm, 28 nm, or 22 nm.


Of course, it is to be understood that the above-described arrangements are only illustrative of the application of the principles of the present invention. Numerous modifications and alternative arrangements may be devised by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention and the appended claims are intended to cover such modifications and arrangements. Thus, while the present invention has been described above with particularity and detail in connection with what is presently deemed to be the most practical and preferred embodiments of the invention, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that numerous modifications, including, but not limited to, variations in size, materials, shape, form, function and manner of operation, assembly and use may be made without departing from the principles and concepts set forth herein.

Claims
  • 1. A CMP pad dresser, comprising: a first monolayer of superabrasive particles disposed on and protruding from one side of a metal support layer, wherein the difference in protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the second highest protruding tip of the monolayer of superabrasive particles is less than or equal to about 50 microns;a second monolayer of superabrasive particles disposed on the metal support layer on an opposite side from the first monolayer, wherein the superabrasive particles of the second monolayer are positioned to have substantially the same distribution as the superabrasive particles of the first monolayer; anda rigid support coupled to the second monolayer of superabrasive particles opposite the first monolayer.
  • 2. The dresser of claim 1, wherein the plurality of superabrasive particles are arranged in at least one annular configuration having a central region devoid of superabrasive particles.
  • 3. The dresser claim 1, wherein the plurality of superabrasive particles are configured in an attitude having a sharp portion oriented towards a pad to be dressed.
  • 4. The dresser of claim 1, wherein the plurality of superabrasive particles are substantially all configured in an attitude having either an apex or an edge portion oriented toward a pad to be dressed.
  • 5. The dresser of claim 1, wherein the difference in protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the second highest protruding tip of the first monolayer of superabrasive particles is less than or equal to about 10 microns.
  • 6. The dresser of claim 5, wherein the difference in protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the 10th highest protruding tip of the first monolayer of superabrasive particles is less than or equal to about 20 microns.
  • 7. The dresser of claim 6, wherein the difference in protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the 100th highest protruding tip of the first monolayer of superabrasive particles is less than or equal to about 40 microns.
  • 8. The dresser of claim 1, wherein the difference in protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the second highest protruding tip of the first monolayer of superabrasive particles is less than or equal to about 20 microns.
PRIORITY DATA

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/489,074, filed on May 23, 2011, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (392)
Number Name Date Kind
187593 Brown et al. Feb 1877 A
1854071 Schacht Apr 1932 A
1988065 Wooddell Jan 1935 A
2027087 Buckner Jan 1936 A
2027307 Schacht Jan 1936 A
2033991 Melton Mar 1936 A
2035521 Benner Mar 1936 A
RE20660 Schacht Feb 1938 E
2184348 Kirchner Dec 1939 A
2187624 Melton Jan 1940 A
2194253 Benner Mar 1940 A
2268663 Kuzmick Jan 1942 A
2281558 Cross May 1942 A
2307461 Guth Jan 1943 A
2318570 Carlton May 1943 A
2334572 Melton Nov 1943 A
2612348 Catallo Sep 1952 A
2725693 Smith Dec 1955 A
2811960 Fessel Nov 1957 A
2867086 Haley Jan 1959 A
2876086 Raymond Mar 1959 A
2947608 Hall Aug 1960 A
2652951 Simpson Sep 1960 A
2952951 Simpson Sep 1960 A
3067551 Maginnis Dec 1962 A
3121981 Hurst Feb 1964 A
3127715 Christensen Apr 1964 A
3146560 Hurst Sep 1964 A
3276852 Lemelson Oct 1966 A
3293012 Smiley Dec 1966 A
3372010 Parsons Mar 1968 A
3377411 Charvat Apr 1968 A
3416560 Bruno Dec 1968 A
3440774 Curn Apr 1969 A
3593382 Miller Jul 1971 A
3608134 Cook Sep 1971 A
3625666 James Dec 1971 A
3630699 Catlin Dec 1971 A
3631638 Yoshikawa et al. Jan 1972 A
3664662 Linz May 1972 A
3706650 Eisner Dec 1972 A
2078354 Webster Apr 1973 A
3743489 Wentorf et al. Jul 1973 A
3767371 Wentorf et al. Oct 1973 A
3802130 Lindenbeck Apr 1974 A
3819814 Pope Jun 1974 A
3852078 Wakatsuki et al. Dec 1974 A
3894673 Lowder et al. Jul 1975 A
3982358 Fukuda Sep 1976 A
4018576 Lowder et al. Apr 1977 A
4078906 Green Mar 1978 A
4149881 D'Silva Apr 1979 A
4151154 Berger Apr 1979 A
4155721 Fletcher May 1979 A
4182628 D'Silva Jan 1980 A
4188194 Gorrigan Feb 1980 A
4201601 D'Silva May 1980 A
4211294 Multakh Jul 1980 A
4211924 Muller et al. Jul 1980 A
4224380 Bovenkerk et al. Sep 1980 A
4228214 Steigelman et al. Oct 1980 A
4229186 Wilson Oct 1980 A
4273561 Villalobos Jun 1981 A
4287168 Wentorf et al. Sep 1981 A
4289503 Corrigan Sep 1981 A
4341532 Oide Jul 1982 A
4355489 Heyer et al. Oct 1982 A
4405411 Inoue et al. Sep 1983 A
4481016 Campbell et al. Nov 1984 A
4525179 Gigl Jun 1985 A
4547257 Iizuka et al. Oct 1985 A
4551195 Iizuka et al. Nov 1985 A
4565034 Sekiya Jan 1986 A
4610699 Yazu et al. Sep 1986 A
4617181 Yazu et al. Oct 1986 A
4629373 Hall Dec 1986 A
4632817 Yazu et al. Dec 1986 A
4662896 Dennis May 1987 A
4669522 Griffin Jun 1987 A
4680199 Vontell et al. Jul 1987 A
4712552 Pangburn Dec 1987 A
4737162 Grazen Apr 1988 A
4749514 Murakami et al. Jun 1988 A
4770907 Kimura Sep 1988 A
4776861 Frushour Oct 1988 A
4780274 Barr Oct 1988 A
4797241 Peterson et al. Jan 1989 A
4828582 Frushour May 1989 A
4849602 Gardner Jul 1989 A
4863573 Moore et al. Sep 1989 A
4866888 Murai et al. Sep 1989 A
4883500 Deakins et al. Nov 1989 A
4908046 Wiand Mar 1990 A
4916869 Oliver Apr 1990 A
4923490 Johnson et al. May 1990 A
4925457 deKok et al. May 1990 A
4927619 Tsuji May 1990 A
4943488 Sung et al. Jul 1990 A
4945686 Wiand Aug 1990 A
4949511 Endo et al. Aug 1990 A
4954139 Cerutti Sep 1990 A
4968326 Wiand Nov 1990 A
5000273 Horton et al. Mar 1991 A
5011513 Zador et al. Apr 1991 A
5022895 Wiand Jun 1991 A
5024680 Chen et al. Jun 1991 A
5030276 Sung et al. Jul 1991 A
5037451 Burnand et al. Aug 1991 A
5043120 Corrigan Aug 1991 A
5049165 Tselesin Sep 1991 A
5092082 Padberg Mar 1992 A
5092910 deKok et al. Mar 1992 A
5116568 Sung May 1992 A
5131924 Wiand Jul 1992 A
5133782 Wiand Jul 1992 A
5137543 Heath et al. Aug 1992 A
5151107 Cho et al. Sep 1992 A
5164247 Solanki et al. Nov 1992 A
5176155 Rudolph, Jr. Jan 1993 A
5190568 Tselesin Mar 1993 A
5194070 Sumiya et al. Mar 1993 A
5194071 Corrigan et al. Mar 1993 A
5195403 Sani et al. Mar 1993 A
5195404 Notter et al. Mar 1993 A
5197249 Wiand Mar 1993 A
5203881 Wiand Apr 1993 A
5232320 Tank et al. Aug 1993 A
5243790 Gagne Sep 1993 A
5246884 Jaso Sep 1993 A
5247765 Quintana Sep 1993 A
5248317 Tank Sep 1993 A
5264011 Brown et al. Nov 1993 A
5266236 Bovenkerk Nov 1993 A
5271547 Carlson Dec 1993 A
5273730 Yoshida et al. Dec 1993 A
5295402 Bovenkerk Mar 1994 A
5314513 Miller May 1994 A
5328548 Tsuji et al. Jul 1994 A
5364423 Bigelow et al. Nov 1994 A
5374293 Takashita et al. Dec 1994 A
5380390 Tselesin Jan 1995 A
5443032 Vichr et al. Aug 1995 A
5453106 Roberts Sep 1995 A
5454343 Eun et al. Oct 1995 A
5458754 Sathrum et al. Oct 1995 A
5486131 Cesna et al. Jan 1996 A
5492771 Lowder et al. Feb 1996 A
5492774 Tateno et al. Feb 1996 A
5496386 Broberg et al. Mar 1996 A
5500248 Iacovangelo et al. Mar 1996 A
5505272 Clark Apr 1996 A
5518443 Fisher May 1996 A
5527424 Mullins Jun 1996 A
5536202 Appel et al. Jul 1996 A
5547417 Breivogel et al. Aug 1996 A
5551959 Martin et al. Sep 1996 A
5560745 Roberts Oct 1996 A
5560754 Johnson et al. Oct 1996 A
5609286 Anthon Mar 1997 A
5620489 Tselesin Apr 1997 A
5660894 Chen et al. Aug 1997 A
5669943 Horton et al. Sep 1997 A
5674572 Sarin et al. Oct 1997 A
5725421 Goers et al. Mar 1998 A
5746931 Graebner May 1998 A
RE35812 Oliver Jun 1998 E
5772756 Davies et al. Jun 1998 A
5776214 Wood Jul 1998 A
5779743 Wood Jul 1998 A
5791975 Cesna et al. Aug 1998 A
5801073 Robbins et al. Sep 1998 A
5816891 Woo Oct 1998 A
5820450 Calhoun Oct 1998 A
5833519 Moore Nov 1998 A
5851138 Hempel, Jr. Dec 1998 A
5855314 Shiue et al. Jan 1999 A
5868806 Nishio et al. Feb 1999 A
5885137 Ploessl Mar 1999 A
5902173 Tanaka May 1999 A
5916011 Kim Jun 1999 A
5919084 Powell et al. Jul 1999 A
5921856 Zimmer Jul 1999 A
5924917 Benedict et al. Jul 1999 A
5961373 Lai Oct 1999 A
5975988 Christianson Nov 1999 A
5976001 Powell et al. Nov 1999 A
5976205 Andrews et al. Nov 1999 A
5980852 Gurns et al. Nov 1999 A
5980982 Degawa et al. Nov 1999 A
5985228 Corrigan et al. Nov 1999 A
6001008 Fujimori et al. Dec 1999 A
6001174 Fang Dec 1999 A
6024824 Krech Feb 2000 A
6027659 Billett Feb 2000 A
6030595 Sumiya et al. Feb 2000 A
6039641 Sung Mar 2000 A
6054183 Zimmer et al. Apr 2000 A
6093280 Kirchner et al. Jul 2000 A
6106382 Sakaguchi Aug 2000 A
6123612 Goers Sep 2000 A
6125612 Main Oct 2000 A
6159087 Birang et al. Dec 2000 A
6159286 Sung Dec 2000 A
6179886 Gordeev et al. Jan 2001 B1
6190240 Kinoshita et al. Feb 2001 B1
6196911 Preston et al. Mar 2001 B1
6200360 Imai et al. Mar 2001 B1
6206942 Wood et al. Mar 2001 B1
6213856 Cho et al. Apr 2001 B1
6217413 Christianson Apr 2001 B1
6224469 Ohmori et al. May 2001 B1
6258138 DeVoe et al. Jul 2001 B1
6258201 Krech Jul 2001 B1
6258237 Gal-Or et al. Jul 2001 B1
6281129 Easter et al. Aug 2001 B1
6284556 Wang et al. Sep 2001 B1
6286498 Sung Sep 2001 B1
6293854 Kimura et al. Sep 2001 B1
6299508 Gagliardi et al. Oct 2001 B1
6299521 Morimura et al. Oct 2001 B1
6312324 Mitsui et al. Nov 2001 B1
6319108 Adefris et al. Nov 2001 B1
6325709 Nanda et al. Dec 2001 B1
6346202 Molnar Feb 2002 B1
6354918 Togawa et al. Mar 2002 B1
6354929 Adefris et al. Mar 2002 B1
6368198 Sung et al. Apr 2002 B1
6371838 Holzapfel Apr 2002 B1
6371842 Romero Apr 2002 B1
6372001 Omar et al. Apr 2002 B1
6394886 Chen et al. May 2002 B1
6409580 Lougher et al. Jun 2002 B1
6416878 An Jul 2002 B2
6439986 Myoung et al. Aug 2002 B1
6446740 Eyre Sep 2002 B2
6458018 Goers et al. Oct 2002 B1
6478831 Tselesin Nov 2002 B2
6497853 Davies et al. Dec 2002 B1
6544599 Brown et al. Apr 2003 B1
6551176 Garretson Apr 2003 B1
6605798 Cullen Aug 2003 B1
6607423 Areayan et al. Aug 2003 B1
6616725 Cho et al. Sep 2003 B2
6626167 Kim et al. Sep 2003 B2
6627168 Ohsubo et al. Sep 2003 B1
6629884 Goers Oct 2003 B1
6672943 Vogtmann Jan 2004 B2
6679243 Sung Jan 2004 B2
6692547 Kim Feb 2004 B2
6694847 Hiroyasu et al. Feb 2004 B2
6722952 Goers et al. Apr 2004 B2
6749485 James et al. Jun 2004 B1
6755720 Ishizaki et al. Jun 2004 B1
6769969 Duescher Aug 2004 B1
6790126 Wood et al. Sep 2004 B2
6818029 Myoung et al. Nov 2004 B2
6824455 Osterheld et al. Nov 2004 B2
6835365 Davies et al. Dec 2004 B1
6837979 Uzho et al. Jan 2005 B2
6884155 Sung et al. Apr 2005 B2
6899592 Kojima et al. May 2005 B1
6905571 Sakuma et al. Jun 2005 B2
6945857 Doan et al. Sep 2005 B1
6979357 Fries et al. Dec 2005 B2
7021995 Toge et al. Apr 2006 B2
7033408 Fries et al. Apr 2006 B2
7044990 Ishizaki et al. May 2006 B2
7066795 Balagani et al. Jun 2006 B2
7067903 Tachibana et al. Jun 2006 B2
7124753 Sung Oct 2006 B2
7150677 Yamashita et al. Dec 2006 B2
7198553 Goers Apr 2007 B2
7201645 Sung Apr 2007 B2
7247577 Palmgren et al. Jul 2007 B2
7258708 Sung Aug 2007 B2
7261621 Moon et al. Aug 2007 B2
7323049 Sung Jan 2008 B2
7368013 Sung May 2008 B2
7384436 Sung Jun 2008 B2
7404857 Sung Jul 2008 B2
7465217 Kinoshita et al. Dec 2008 B2
7494404 Sung Feb 2009 B2
7507267 Hall et al. Mar 2009 B2
7585366 Sung Sep 2009 B2
7641538 Goers Jan 2010 B2
7651368 Kendall et al. Jan 2010 B2
7651386 Sung Jan 2010 B2
7658666 Sung Feb 2010 B2
7690971 Sung Apr 2010 B2
7762872 Sung Jul 2010 B2
7791188 Sung Sep 2010 B2
7840305 Behr et al. Nov 2010 B2
7954483 Kim et al. Jun 2011 B2
8104464 Sung Jan 2012 B2
8377158 Palmgren et al. Feb 2013 B2
8393934 Sung Mar 2013 B2
8398466 Sung et al. Mar 2013 B2
8545583 Duescher Oct 2013 B2
8777699 Sung Jul 2014 B2
20010003884 Wei et al. Jun 2001 A1
20010009844 Cho et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010046835 Wielonski et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020014041 Baldonai et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020042200 Fawcett Apr 2002 A1
20020127962 Cho et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020139680 George Oct 2002 A1
20020164928 Tolles Nov 2002 A1
20020173234 Sung et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020182401 Lawing Dec 2002 A1
20030054746 Nussbaumer Mar 2003 A1
20030084894 Sung May 2003 A1
20030092357 Yoon et al. May 2003 A1
20030114094 Myoung et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030207659 Annen et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040009742 Lin et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040023610 Hu et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040060243 Fries et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040079033 Long Apr 2004 A1
20040091627 Ohara et al. May 2004 A1
20040107648 Sung Jun 2004 A1
20040180617 Goers Sep 2004 A1
20040203325 Donohue Oct 2004 A1
20040235406 Duescher Nov 2004 A1
20040238946 Tachibana et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050032462 Gagliardi et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050032469 Duescher Feb 2005 A1
20050060941 Provow Mar 2005 A1
20050095959 Sung May 2005 A1
20050118939 Duescher Jun 2005 A1
20050215188 Toge et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050227590 Sung Oct 2005 A1
20050260939 Andrews et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060073774 Sung Apr 2006 A1
20060079160 Balagani et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060079162 Yamashita et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060128288 An et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060135050 Petersen et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060143991 Sung Jul 2006 A1
20060213128 Sung Sep 2006 A1
20060254154 Huang et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060258276 Sung Nov 2006 A1
20070051354 Sung Mar 2007 A1
20070051355 Sung Mar 2007 A1
20070060026 Sung Mar 2007 A1
20070066194 Wielonski et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070093181 Lugg et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070128994 Sung Jun 2007 A1
20070155298 Sung Jul 2007 A1
20070232074 Ravi et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070249270 Sung Oct 2007 A1
20070254566 Sung Nov 2007 A1
20070264918 Sung Nov 2007 A1
20070266639 Sung Nov 2007 A1
20070295267 Sung Dec 2007 A1
20080014845 Yimaz et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080076338 Andrews et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080096479 Sung Apr 2008 A1
20080153398 Sung Jun 2008 A1
20080171503 Sung Jul 2008 A1
20080271384 Puthanangady Nov 2008 A1
20080292869 Sung Nov 2008 A1
20080296756 Koch et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090068937 Sung Mar 2009 A1
20090093195 Sung Apr 2009 A1
20090094902 Hou Apr 2009 A1
20090123705 Sung May 2009 A1
20090145045 Sung Jun 2009 A1
20090215363 Sung Aug 2009 A1
20090283089 Sung Nov 2009 A1
20100015898 An et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100022174 Chou et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100139174 Sung Jun 2010 A1
20100186479 Borucki et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100203811 Philipossian et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100221990 Sung Sep 2010 A1
20100248595 Dinh-Ngoc et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100248596 Sung Sep 2010 A1
20100261419 Sung Oct 2010 A1
20110076925 Sung Mar 2011 A1
20110104989 Boutaghou et al. May 2011 A1
20110192652 Shen et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110212670 Sung Sep 2011 A1
20110252710 Hall et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110275288 Sung Nov 2011 A1
20110293905 Sung Dec 2011 A1
20110296766 Sung Dec 2011 A1
20120192499 Sung Aug 2012 A1
20120241943 Sung Sep 2012 A1
20120244790 Sung Sep 2012 A1
20120260582 Sung Oct 2012 A1
20120302146 Sung Nov 2012 A1
20130225052 Song et al. Aug 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (41)
Number Date Country
1351922 Jun 2002 CN
1494984 May 2004 CN
0238434 Mar 1987 EP
0264674 Sep 1987 EP
0280657 Aug 1988 EP
0331344 Feb 1989 EP
0712941 May 1996 EP
1075898 Feb 2001 EP
2239011 Jun 1991 GB
2366804 Mar 2002 GB
06182184 Jul 1994 JP
10128654 May 1998 JP
10180618 Jul 1998 JP
11048122 Feb 1999 JP
11077536 Mar 1999 JP
2000167774 Jun 2000 JP
2000343436 Dec 2000 JP
2003071718 Mar 2003 JP
2007-044823 Feb 2007 JP
2007044823 Feb 2007 JP
2004025401 Jan 2009 JP
1020020036138 May 2002 KR
200339181 Jan 2004 KR
1020070063569 Jun 2007 KR
WO 9427883 Dec 1994 WO
WO 9527596 Oct 1995 WO
WO 9531006 Nov 1995 WO
WO 9606732 Mar 1996 WO
WO 9810897 Mar 1998 WO
WO 9851448 Mar 1998 WO
WO 9845091 Oct 1998 WO
WO 9845092 Oct 1998 WO
WO 0231078 Apr 2002 WO
WO 2004094106 Nov 2004 WO
WO 2006039413 Apr 2006 WO
WO2006124792 Nov 2006 WO
WO 2007032946 Mar 2007 WO
WO2008063599 May 2008 WO
WO 2009043058 Apr 2009 WO
WO 2009064677 May 2009 WO
WO 2012040374 Mar 2012 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (63)
Entry
PCT/US2012/039199; filed May 23, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; International Search Report dated Dec. 18, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/362,917, filed Jan. 13, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Dec. 31, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/168,110, filed Jul. 5, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; notice of allowance dated Jan. 18, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,198, filed Sep. 21, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Jul. 23, 2013.
PCT/US2013/042538; filed May 23, 2013; Chien-Min Sung; international search report dated Aug. 27, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/726,786, filed Mar. 18, 2010; Chien-Min Sung; notice of allowance dated Sep. 4, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/255,823, filed Oct. 22, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; notice of allowance dated Dec. 26, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/726,786, filed Mar. 18, 2010; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Mar. 19, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/362,917, filed Jan. 31, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Apr. 10, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/407,634, filed Feb. 28, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Jun. 13, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/239, 189, filed Sep. 21, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Dec. 21, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/059,422, filed Mar. 31, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Jan. 24, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/153,176, filed Jun. 3, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Dec. 6, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/715,583, filed Mar. 2, 2010; Chien-Min Sung; notice of allowance dated Dec. 7, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/113,779, filed May 23, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Nov. 12, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/021,350, filed Feb. 4, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Mar. 20, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,189, filed Sep. 21, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; notice of allowance dated May 3, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/267,172, filed Nov. 7, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; notice of allowance dated Jan. 7, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,189, filed Sep. 21, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; notice of allowance dated Mar. 4, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/644,790, filed Oct. 4, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Jun. 17, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/416,201, filed Mar. 9, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Jun. 18, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/153,176, filed Jun. 3, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Jul. 1, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/113,779, filed May 23, 2011; Chien-Min Sung office action dated Jul. 2, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/794,164, filed Mar. 11, 2013; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Jul. 16, 2014.
Colmonoy Technical Data Sheet; No. DSP-A; 1993.
Endecott's Specifications; 2004.
Kennametal Specification for DMHPM002 Hot Press Matrix N-50 Dec. 6, 2001.
Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS), Wall Colmonoy Corporation; prepared Jul. 20, 1989.
Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS); Kennametal; issued Jun. 11, 2004.
Sung et al.; The Eastern Wind of Diamond Synthesis; New Diamond and Frontier Carpon Technology; 2003; pp. 47-61; vol. 13, No. 1.
Sung et al; Mechanism of the Solvent-Assisted Graphite to Diamond Transition Under High Pressure: Implications for the Selection of Catalysts, High Temperatures-High Pressure; 1995/1996; pp. 523-546; vol. 27/28.
Syndite, CTM302; Announcement, Elementsix Advancing Diamond; Jan. 14, 2003; http://www.e6.com/en/resourches/announcementsheets/CTM302.pdf; as accessed on Dec. 16, 2008.
Sung et al.; The Eastern Wind of Diamond Symthesis; New Diamond and Frontier Carpon Technology; 2003; pp. 47-61; vol. 13, No. 1.
Syndite, Elementsix Advancing Diamond; 2 pages; Jan. 14, 2003.
U.S. Appl. No. 08/832,852, filed Apr. 4, 1997; Chien-Min Sung.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/447,620, filed Nov. 22, 1999; Chien-Min Sung.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/512,755, filed Aug. 29, 2006; Chien-Min Sung.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,198, filed Sep. 21, 2011; Chien-Min Sung.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/416,201, filed Mar. 9, 2012; Chien-Min Sung.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/479,148, filed May 23, 2012; Chien-Min Sung.
Yasinaga et al; Advances in Abrasive Technology, III; Soc. of Grinding Engineers (SGE) in Japan; 2000.
PCT Application PCT/US2011/052627; filed Sep. 21, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; International Search Report mailed May 11, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/362,917, filed Jan. 31, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Jun. 14, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/168,110, filed Jul. 5, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated May 14, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/059,422, filed Mar. 30, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Aug. 22, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/255,823, filed Oct. 21, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; notice of allowance dated Sep. 21, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/168,110, filed Jul. 5, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; notice of allowance dated Sep. 28, 2012.
PCT Application PCT/US2007/024165; filed Nov. 16, 2007; Chien-Min Sung; Internaitonal Search Report mailed May 23, 2011.
PCT Application PCT/US2011/052626; filed Sep. 21, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; International Search Report mailed May 2, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/255,823, filed Oct. 22, 2005; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued Mar. 7, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/267,172, filed Nov. 7, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued Jan. 3, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/267,172, filed Jan. 31, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued Jul. 9, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/715,583, filed Mar. 2, 2010; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued Mar. 21, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/715,583; filed Mar. 2, 2010; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued Aug. 9, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/715,583, filed Mar. 2, 2010; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued Oct. 25, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/328,338, filed Dec. 4, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued May 10, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/021,350, filed Feb. 4, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued Aug. 31, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/021,350, filed Feb. 4, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued Feb. 7, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/113/779, filed May 23, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Oct. 9, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/153,176, filed Jun. 3, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Oct. 10, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/407,634, filed Feb. 28, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Oct. 29, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,112, filed Mar. 13, 2013; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Nov. 6, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/644,790, filed Oct. 4, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Dec. 24, 2014.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120302146 A1 Nov 2012 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61489074 May 2011 US