The semiconductor industry currently spends in excess of one billion U.S. dollars each year manufacturing silicon wafers that must exhibit very flat and smooth surfaces. Known techniques to manufacture smooth and even-surfaced silicon wafers are plentiful. The most common of these involves the process known as Chemical Mechanical Polishing (CMP) which includes the use of a polishing pad in combination with an abrasive slurry. Of central importance in all CMP processes is the attainment of high performance levels in aspects such as uniformity of polished wafer, smoothness of the IC circuitry, removal rate for productivity, longevity of consumables for CMP economics, etc.
The present disclosure provides CMP pad dressers and associated methods thereof. In one aspect, for example, a CMP pad dresser can include a matrix layer and a monolayer of a plurality of superabrasive particles embedded in the matrix layer, where each superabrasive particle in the monolayer protrudes from the matrix layer. The difference in the protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the next highest protruding tip of the monolayer of superabrasive particles can be less than or equal to about 20 microns, and the difference in protrusion distance between the highest 1% of the protruding tips of the monolayer of superabrasive particles are within about 80 microns or less. In one specific aspect, a rigid support is coupled to the matrix layer.
In another aspect, the difference in protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the next highest protruding tip of the monolayer of superabrasive particles is less than or equal to about 15 microns. In yet another aspect, the difference in protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the next highest protruding tip of the monolayer of superabrasive particles is less than or equal to about 10 microns. In a further aspect, the difference in protrusion distance between the highest 10 protruding tips of the monolayer of superabrasive particles are within about 30 microns or less. In another aspect, the difference in protrusion distance between the highest 100 protruding tips of the monolayer of superabrasive particles are within about 50 microns or less. In yet another aspect, the difference in protrusion distance between the highest 1% of the protruding tips of the first monolayer of superabrasive particles are within about 50 microns or less. In another aspect, the difference in protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the second highest protruding tip is less than or equal to about 10 microns. In yet another aspect, the difference in protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the 10th highest protruding tip is less than or equal to about 20 microns. In a further aspect, the difference in protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the 100th highest protruding tip is less than or equal to about 40 microns. In another aspect, the highest protruding tip protrudes from the matrix layer to a height greater than or equal to about 50 microns.
In another aspect, a CMP pad dresser is provided. Such a dresser can include a first monolayer of superabrasive particles disposed on one side of a metal support layer and a second monolayer of superabrasive particles disposed on the metal support layer on an opposite side from the first monolayer. The superabrasive particles of the second monolayer are positioned to have substantially the same distribution as the superabrasive particles of the first monolayer, and a rigid support is coupled to the second monolayer of superabrasive particles opposite the first monolayer.
In yet another aspect, a method of making a CMP pad dresser includes disposing a first monolayer of superabrasive particles on a metal support layer and disposing a second monolayer of superabrasive particles on the metal support layer on a side opposite the first monolayer. The superabrasive particles of the second monolayer are positioned to have substantially the same distribution as the superabrasive particles of the first monolayer. The method further includes bonding the first monolayer of superabrasive particles and the second monolayer of superabrasive particles to the metal support layer such that symmetrical forces due to the substantially similar distribution between the first monolayer and the second monolayer precludes substantial warping of the metal support layer. In one aspect, the method can further include coupling the second monolayer of superabrasive particles to a rigid support.
In one aspect, the bonding of at least one of the first monolayer and the second monolayer is by brazing with a braze material. In another aspect, the bonding of at least one of the first monolayer and the second monolayer is under heat and pressure. In one specific aspect, the heat and pressure bonds at least one of the first monolayer and the second monolayer directly to the metal support layer. In another specific aspect, the bonding of at least one of the first monolayer and the second monolayer further includes disposing a sintering compound on the metal support layer in contact with at least one of the first monolayer and the second monolayer and sintering the sintering compound to bond the at least one of the first monolayer and the second monolayer to the metal support layer. In one specific aspect, the method further includes infiltrating the sintering compound with a braze material during bonding.
In yet another aspect, a method of minimizing warpage of a CMP pad dresser during manufacture is provided. Such a method can include substantially equalizing warping forces on opposing sides of a metal support layer during bonding of a plurality of superabrasive particles thereto, wherein warpage of the support layer is minimized during bonding due to the equalized forces on opposing sides. In one aspect, substantially equalizing forces includes arranging the plurality of superabrasive particles on opposing sides of the support layer such that the plurality of superabrasive particles has substantially the same distribution on either side of the support layer to substantially equalize warping forces during bonding.
In a further aspect, a CMP pad dresser is provided. Such a dresser can include a plurality of superabrasive particles arranged as a working surface, wherein the difference in protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the second highest protruding tip is less than or equal to about 10 microns, the difference in protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the 10th highest protruding tip is less than or equal to about 20 microns, the difference in protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the 100th highest protruding tip is less than or equal to about 40 microns, and the highest protruding tip has a protrusion distance of greater than or equal to about 50 microns.
There has thus been outlined, rather broadly, various features of the invention so that the detailed description thereof that follows may be better understood, and so that the present contribution to the art may be better appreciated. Other features of the present invention will become clearer from the following detailed description of the invention, taken with the accompanying claims, or may be learned by the practice of the invention.
It will be understood that the above figures are merely for illustrative purposes in furthering an understanding of the invention. Further, the figures are not drawn to scale, thus dimensions, particle sizes, and other aspects may, and generally are, exaggerated to make illustrations thereof clearer. Therefore, departure can be made from the specific dimensions and aspects shown in the figures in order to produce the heat spreaders of the present invention.
Before the present invention is disclosed and described, it is to be understood that this invention is not limited to the particular structures, method steps, or materials disclosed herein, but is extended to equivalents thereof as would be recognized by those ordinarily skilled in the relevant arts. It should also be understood that terminology employed herein is used for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting.
It must be noted that, as used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an” and, “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “a diamond particle” includes one or more of such particles and reference to “the layer” includes reference to one or more of such layers.
In describing and claiming the present invention, the following terminology will be used in accordance with the definitions set forth below.
As used herein, the terms “conditioner” and “dresser” can be used interchangeably, and refer to a tool used to condition or dress a pad, such as a CMP pad.
As used herein, “dressing segment” refers to a dressing or conditioning element of a CMP pad dresser. Dressing segments are utilized in the present invention to carry superabrasive particles having leveled tips. Thus superabrasive particles are introduced into a CMP pad dresser by the incorporation of multiple dressing segments. It should be noted that a variety of techniques of attaching the dressing segments to the substrates, and a variety of techniques of attaching the superabrasive particles to the dressing segments, are discussed herein. It is to be understood that all of these various attachment mechanisms can be used interchangeably herein: that is, if a method of attaching a dressing segment to a substrate is discussed herein, the method of attachment discussed can also be used to attach a superabrasive particles to a dressing segment. For any particular CMP pad dresser being discussed, however, it is understood that attachment methods of the superabrasive particles to the dressing segments can differ from, or can be the same as, the method used to attach the dressing segments to the pad conditioner substrate.
As used herein, “superabrasive” may be used to refer to any crystalline, or polycrystalline material, or mixture of such materials which has a Mohr's hardness of about 8 or greater. In some aspects, the Mohr's hardness may be about 9.5 or greater. Such materials include but are not limited to diamond, polycrystalline diamond (PCD), cubic boron nitride (cBN), polycrystalline cubic boron nitride (PcBN), corundum and sapphire, as well as other superabrasive materials known to those skilled in the art. Superabrasive materials may be incorporated into the present invention in a variety of forms including particles, grits, films, layers, pieces, segments, etc. In some cases, the superabrasive materials of the present invention are in the form of polycrystalline superabrasive materials, such as PCD and PcBN materials.
As used herein, “organic material” refers to a semisolid or solid complex or mix of organic compounds. “Organic material layer” and “organic matrix” may be used interchangeably, and refer to a layer or mass of a semisolid or solid complex or mix of organic compounds, including resins, polymers, gums, etc. The organic material can be a polymer or copolymer formed from the polymerization of one or more monomers. In some cases, such organic material can be adhesive.
As used herein, the process of “brazing” is intended to refer to the creation of chemical bonds between the carbon atoms of the superabrasive particles/materials and the braze material. Further, “chemical bond” means a covalent bond, such as a carbide or boride bond, rather than mechanical or weaker inter-atom attractive forces. Thus, when “brazing” is used in connection with superabrasive particles a true chemical bond is being formed. However, when “brazing” is used in connection with metal to metal bonding the term is used in the more traditional sense of a metallurgical bond. Therefore, brazing of a superabrasive segment to a tool body does not necessarily require the presence of a carbide former.
As used herein, “particle” is as used herein in connection with diamond particles, and refers to a particulate form of diamond. Such particles may take a variety of shapes, including round, oblong, square, euhedral, etc., can be either single crystal or polycrystalline, and can have a number of mesh sizes. As is known in the art, “mesh” refers to the number of holes per unit area as in the case of U.S. meshes. All mesh sizes referred to herein are U.S. mesh unless otherwise indicated. Further, mesh sizes are generally understood to indicate an average mesh size of a given collection of particles since each particle within a particular “mesh size” may actually vary over a small distribution of sizes.
As used herein, “sharp portion” means any narrow portion to which a crystal or particle may come, including but not limited to corners, apexes, ridges, edges, obelisks, and other protrusions. In some cases, corners and/or apexes are formed at the convergence of more than two faces of the particle or crystal, or other body, disposed in intersecting planes. In other aspects, edges and/or ridges may be formed at the convergence of two or at least two faces of the particle or crystal, or other body, disposed in intersecting planes. In some aspects, “sharp portion” can include a portion that is broken, chipped, cracked, jagged, and the like. In some aspects, degrees of sharpness can be correlated with the geometric angle formed by the particle, crystal, or other body, at the location in question. In some aspects, an angle of 90 degrees or less can be considered sharp. In other aspects, an angle of 60 degrees or less can be considered sharp. In yet other aspects, and angle of 45 degrees or less, or 30 degrees or less can be considered to be sharp.
As used herein, “peripherally located,” “peripheral location” and the like, mean any particle of a dresser that is located in an area that originates at the leading edge or outer rim of a dresser and extends inwardly towards the center for up to about 90% of the radius of the dresser. In some aspects, the area may extend inwardly from about 20% to 90% of the radius. In other aspects, the area may extend in to about 50% of the radius. In yet another aspect, the area may extend in to about 33% of the radius of a dresser (i.e. 66% away from the center).
As used herein, “working end” refers to an end of a particle which is oriented towards the CMP pad and during a dressing operation makes contact with the pad. Most often the working end of a particle will be distal from a substrate to which the particle is attached.
As used herein, “attitude” means the position or arrangement of a superabrasive particle in relation to a defined surface, such as a substrate to which it is attached, or a CMP pad to which it is to be applied during a work operation. For example, a superabrasive particle can have an attitude that provides a specific portion of the particle in orientation toward a CMP pad.
As used herein, “sintering” refers to the joining of two or more individual particles to form a continuous solid mass. The process of sintering involves the consolidation of particles to at least partially eliminate voids between particles.
The term “metallic” refers to both metals and metalloids. Metals include those compounds typically considered metals found within the transition metals, alkali and alkali earth metals. Examples of metals are Ag, Au, Cu, Al, and Fe. Metalloids include specifically Si, B, Ge, Sb, As, and Te. Metallic materials also include alloys or mixtures that include metallic materials. Such alloys or mixtures may further include additional additives. In the present invention, carbide formers and carbon wetting agents may be included as alloys or mixtures, but are not anticipated to be the only metallic component. Examples of such carbide formers are Sc, Y, Ti, Zr, Hf, V, Nb, Cr, Mo, Mn, Ta, W, and Tc. Examples of carbon wetting agents are Co, Ni, Mn, and Cr.
As used herein, “infiltrating” refers to a situation where a material is heated to its melting point and then flows as a liquid through the interstitial voids between particles.
As used herein, the term “substantially” refers to the complete or nearly complete extent or degree of an action, characteristic, property, state, structure, item, or result. For example, an object that is “substantially” enclosed would mean that the object is either completely enclosed or nearly completely enclosed. The exact allowable degree of deviation from absolute completeness may in some cases depend on the specific context. However, generally speaking the nearness of completion will be so as to have the same overall result as if absolute and total completion were obtained.
The use of “substantially” is equally applicable when used in a negative connotation to refer to the complete or near complete lack of an action, characteristic, property, state, structure, item, or result. For example, a composition that is “substantially free of” particles would either completely lack particles, or so nearly completely lack particles that the effect would be the same as if it completely lacked particles. In other words, a composition that is “substantially free of” an ingredient or element may still actually contain such item as long as there is no measurable effect thereof.
As used herein, the term “about” is used to provide flexibility to a numerical range endpoint by providing that a given value may be “a little above” or “a little below” the endpoint.
As used herein, a plurality of items, structural elements, compositional elements, and/or materials may be presented in a common list for convenience. However, these lists should be construed as though each member of the list is individually identified as a separate and unique member. Thus, no individual member of such list should be construed as a de facto equivalent of any other member of the same list solely based on their presentation in a common group without indications to the contrary.
Concentrations, amounts, and other numerical data may be expressed or presented herein in a range format. It is to be understood that such a range format is used merely for convenience and brevity and thus should be interpreted flexibly to include not only the numerical values explicitly recited as the limits of the range, but also to include all the individual numerical values or sub-ranges encompassed within that range as if each numerical value and sub-range is explicitly recited. As an illustration, a numerical range of “about 1 to about 5” should be interpreted to include not only the explicitly recited values of about 1 to about 5, but also include individual values and sub-ranges within the indicated range. Thus, included in this numerical range are individual values such as 2, 3, and 4 and sub-ranges such as from 1-3, from 2-4, and from 3-5, etc., as well as 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, individually. This same principle applies to ranges reciting only one numerical value as a minimum or a maximum. Furthermore, such an interpretation should apply regardless of the breadth of the range or the characteristics being described.
The Invention
The present disclosure generally provides CMP pad dressers and associated methods that can be utilized in conditioning (e.g., smoothing, polishing, dressing) a CMP pad. Pad conditioners of the present invention can be advantageously utilized, for example, in dressing CMP pads that are used in polishing, finishing or otherwise affecting semiconductor materials. Specifically, the present disclosure concerns CMP pad dressers having superabrasive particles with substantially leveled tips. Traditional CMP pad dresser manufacturing methods, even many of those describing techniques for leveling superabrasive particle tips prior to fixation, generally contain significant variation in tip height across the surface of the dresser. Often, the superabrasive particles are affixed to the CMP pad dresser support in a manner that disrupts any leveling that has occurred. For example, fixation techniques that utilize high heat and/or pressure can cause warping of the dresser support as the dresser cools. Thus, unless steps are taken to avoid such warpage, superabrasive particles are not maintained in their leveled state following cooling of the dresser. This can be particularly problematic with brazing techniques.
Accordingly, minimizing the warpage of the metal support layer can maintain a greater degree of leveling of superabrasive particle tips in the finished tool. When heat and/or pressure are used to make a superabrasive tool, warpage of the metal support layer can cause great variations in tip height level, even for those particles that were leveled prior to heating and/or applying pressure. By distributing the warpage forces equally or substantially equally on both sides of the metal support layer through the arrangement of the superabrasive particles, these forces effectively cancel each other with respect to the degree of warping occurring in the metal support layer, thus also minimizing the relative height movement of the superabrasive particles relative to one another.
The present CMP pad dressers include a layer of superabrasive particles having substantially leveled tips across the working surface of the finished CMP pad dresser. A variety of techniques can be utilized to maintain tip leveling, and any such technique is considered to be within the present scope. A few non-limiting examples of such techniques are described below.
In one aspect, as is shown in
In another aspect, the difference in protrusion distance the difference in protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the second highest protruding tip is less than or equal to about 10 microns. In yet another aspect, the difference in protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the 10th highest protruding tip is less than or equal to about 20 microns. In a further aspect, the difference in protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the 100th highest protruding tip is less than or equal to about 40 microns. In yet a further aspect, the highest protruding tip protrudes from the matrix layer to a height greater than or equal to about 50 microns. In another aspect, the highest protruding tip has a protrusion distance of greater than or equal to about 50 microns.
It is noted that the recited protrusion distances can include a distribution across the entire monolayer surface or a discrete area or segment of the monolayer. For example, the highest 1% of protruding tips can be located around the periphery of the monolayer. In another example, discrete regions of leveled superabrasive particle tips can be located within a larger area of superabrasive particles having a lower protrusion distance than the leveled portion. It is also contemplated that the monolayer can include multiple regions or segments of superabrasive particles that are leveled as described, within a larger area of superabrasive particles having a lower protrusion distance.
Various methods can be utilized to measure superabrasive particle tip height to determine the difference in protrusion distance between tips. As such, any method for making such a determination is considered to be within the present scope. It should be noted that for the purposes of the present disclosure, the term “protrusion” refers to the height of a particle relative to some reference point. Techniques for such measurements can include direct measurements of the tip heights relative to a reference point such as, for example, the highest particle tip, a surface of a rigid support, the bottom surface of the matrix, etc. Measurements of particle height from the surface of the matrix material can be problematic, however, due to the irregular nature of such materials due to wicking around the superabrasive particles. In those cases whereby the matrix material is uniform, such a surface may be used to determine particle height. Additionally, a relative protrusion or height difference between two particles would be the difference in the heights between these particles measured from a common reference point. Furthermore, in some cases the superabrasive particles may lie along a slope, curvature, or some other arrangement that is not parallel to the metal support layer. In these cases, the protrusion height would be normalized against the slope, curvature, or other arrangement so that the relative protrusion height difference between particles can be measured in the absence of the slope, curvature, etc. It should be noted that superabrasive particle tip height leveling can, in some cases, be independent from the positioning or patterning of the superabrasive particles across the surface of the dresser.
One example of a direct measurement technique can include an optical scanning process to evaluate superabrasive particle tip positions. In one such process, an optical scanner can scan the surface of the CMP pad dresser to determine the height of the superabrasive particle tips relative to a fixed point. For example, the scanner can scan downward in space toward the dresser until the highest tip is located. The highest tip can then be set to the reference point, and the scanner can continue scanning in a direction toward the dresser measuring the distance from the reference point to each superabrasive particle tip across the surface of the dresser. Accordingly, the difference in protrusion distance between all of the superabrasive particles across the dresser can be directly measured.
Furthermore, measurement techniques can also include indirect measurements, such as, for example, applying the diamond monolayer to a deformable substrate that deforms relative to the protrusion distance of the particle tips. The diamond monolayer can be pressed into the deformable substrate and/or moved across the deformable substrate to form a scratch pattern therein. Tip height can thus be extrapolated from such indirect measurements.
A variety of materials are contemplated for use as superabrasive particles. Any superabrasive known that can be utilized in a CMP pad dresser should be considered to be within the present scope. Non-limiting examples of such materials include diamond materials, nitride materials, ceramics, and the like. In one aspect, the superabrasive particles include diamond materials. Such diamond materials can include natural or synthetic diamond, single crystal, polycrystalline, and the like. In another aspect, the superabrasive particles include cubic boron nitride materials. Additionally, various diamond particles sizes can be used, including mesh sizes such as 10/20, 30/40, 80/90, 90/100, 100/120, 120/140, 140/170, 170/200, 200/230, 230/270, 270/325, and 325/400.
Additionally, the plurality the superabrasive particles can be oriented so as to affect dressing performance of a CMP pad. Orienting the superabrasive particles in a specific attitude in relation to the CMP pad to be dressed creates different asperities in the pad surface, thus altering the performance of the CMP pad. Different asperities retain slurry in different manners and thus polish a workpiece differently according to asperity depth, width, density, etc. The superabrasive particles of a CMP pad dresser can be oriented according to the desired polishing characteristics of the CMP pad. For example, if the superabrasive particles predominantly have an apex oriented towards the CMP pad, the asperities of the pad will be narrow and deep. The advantages of narrow and deep asperities are that the pad can better retain the polishing slurry, and thus the polishing rate of the wafer increases. However, the increased polishing rate may also increase the wear rate of the superabrasive particles. As such, wear rate may vary depending on the attitude of the superabrasive particles, and therefore, the orientation of each superabrasive particle may be considered when designing a device with desired performance characteristics. Generally speaking, superabrasive particle attitudes that provide higher dressing rates (i.e. deeper penetration into a pad) also wear particles out at a higher rate.
In contrast, if the superabrasive particles are oriented with a face towards the pad, the resulting asperities may polish at a lower rate. The face of the particle is generally thought to be more durable, but does not typically cut deep and narrow asperities in the pad, but rather asperities that are shallow and broad. Therefore the face portion of a particle will dress a CMP pad at a reduced rate compared to the apex portion of a particle, but the superabrasive particle will wear at a much lower rate.
The edge portions of a superabrasive particle have dressing and wear characteristics that are between those of the face and apex portions. It has been thought that if the edge portion is utilized to dress a CMP pad, the asperities are not as deep or narrow as those dressed with an apex portion, but may provide asperities having desirable intermediate characteristics. Further, the edge portion of the particle does not wear at such a high rate as that of an apex.
In one aspect, the plurality of superabrasive particles are substantially all configured in an attitude having either an apex portion oriented toward a pad to be dressed. In another aspect, the plurality of superabrasive particles are substantially all configured in an attitude having either an edge portion oriented toward a pad to be dressed. In yet another aspect, the plurality of superabrasive particles can be configured in an attitude having a sharp portion oriented towards a pad to be dressed.
A CMP pad dresser having such substantially leveled tip arrangements can have a low scratch rate because superabrasive particles are less likely to pull out of the matrix layer due to their more uniform protrusion distribution compared to traditional dressers. Additionally, the more uniform protrusion distributions of such a dressers allows the conditioning of CMP pads in such a manner as to facilitate good polishing rates while at the same time extending the effective working life of the dresser. These benefits can be affected by, for example, uniform asperity spacing and size distribution in the CMP pad.
In one aspect of the present disclosure, superabrasive tip leveling can be accomplished by manufacturing the CMP pad dresser in such a way that the effects of warpage are minimized. For example, in one aspect a CMP pad dresser can be made in at least a two stage process, where the first stage is performed in a manner that minimizes perturbations of the leveled tips in a process that would normally significantly move the superabrasive tips out of a leveled arrangement, such as, for example, by brazing. The second stage of the process can further enhance the leveling of superabrasive particle tips across the CMP pad dresser.
Various exemplary configurations of CMP pad dressers having substantially leveled tips are contemplated. In one aspect, for example, a CMP pad dresser can include a first monolayer of superabrasive particles disposed on one side of a metal support layer and a second monolayer of superabrasive particles disposed on the metal support layer on an opposite side from the first monolayer. The superabrasive particles of the second monolayer are positioned to have substantially the same distribution as the superabrasive particles of the first monolayer. A rigid support is coupled to the second monolayer of superabrasive particles opposite the first monolayer to provide support to the dresser.
As is shown in
The metal support layer can be any material capable of supporting the diamond monolayer during tool formation. Such materials can include, without limitation, metal materials, metal alloy materials, braze alloy materials, ceramic materials, composites, and the like.
In one aspect, the superabrasive particles can be arranged into a predetermined pattern. Such a pattern can be a uniformly distributed pattern or a non-uniformly distributed pattern. Additionally, a variety of techniques are contemplated to facilitate the arrangement of superabrasive particles into a predetermined pattern. Predetermined is understood to mean a non-random pattern that has been determined prior to arranging the superabrasive particles. In one aspect, a predetermined pattern can also apply to a predetermined spacing between particles. Non-limiting examples of such techniques include arrangement by a template, arrangement using spots of adhesives, arrangement on a first substrate followed by a pattern specific transfer from the first substrate to the metal support layer, and the like, including combinations thereof. The superabrasive particles from either of the monolayers can be temporarily held in position in the predetermined pattern using a variety of techniques, including, without limitation, adhesives, dimpled locations on the metal support matrix, a supporting compound such as, for example, a wax, and the like, including combinations thereof. In one specific aspect, the superabrasive particles can be temporarily coupled to the metal support layer using an adhesive that then volatilizes away and is eliminated during construction of the dresser.
In one aspect, the predetermined pattern can be a uniformly distributed grid. In another aspect, the predetermined pattern can be an annular configuration having a central region devoid of superabrasive particles. In one specific aspect, the annular configuration can include an annular ring. In another specific aspect, the annular configuration can include a portion of an annular ring. In yet another aspect, an annular configuration can include one or more concentric annular rings nested inside one another. In other aspects, the monolayer distribution can be discrete radial regions, spiral regions, and the like.
The disposition of a monolayer of superabrasive particles on each side of the metal layer thus moderates the thermal shrinkage from the brazing temperature that would otherwise buckle a distribution of superabrasive particles arranged on just one side. By applying a monolayer to each side of the metal support layer, warping forces such as thermal movement and pressure can be equalized or substantially equalized on both sides. As such, the warpage of the metal support layer can be minimized. In other words, the forces responsible for warping are applied substantially equally to each side of the metal layer and can thus at least partially cancel one another out, thus minimizing warpage that can otherwise occur. In some aspects, the superabrasive particles making up the monolayers on each side of the metal layer can have matching configurations, patterns, or orientations to one another. In this way there can be a substantially matching spatial arrangement of superabrasive particles on each side of the metal layer. In another aspect, the configurations, patterns, or orientations can be different or varied from one another, or may be partially matching. In yet another aspect, the patterned placement of the superabrasive particles on one side of the metal support layer can be substantially aligned with the pattern of superabrasive particles on the other side of the metal layer so that particle locations match one another. In some aspects, there can be a direct correspondence between the spatial positioning of superabrasive particles on one side of the metal support layer and the spatial positioning of superabrasive particles on the other side of the metal support layer. In another aspect, the patterns of superabrasive particles may match or substantially match one another, but may be offset on opposite sides of the metal support layer so that particle locations do not match one another.
In another aspect, as is shown in
The bonding material can be any material capable of securing superabrasive particles therein. Non-limiting examples of bonding materials include metal brazes, metal braze alloys, organic matrix materials, sintered materials, electroplated materials, and the like, including combinations thereof.
In one aspect, for example, the superabrasive particles can be brazed to the metal support layer, and thus the bonding material can be a metal braze or metal braze alloy. Metal brazing techniques are known in the art. A green braze material can be applied to the metal support layer on or around the superabrasive particles. The metal braze can be applied in any know configuration, including braze sheets, powders, pastes, sprays, and the like, including combinations thereof. Once applied to the metal support layer, the braze can be heated and melted to coat at least a portion of the metal support layer and to bond the superabrasive particles. The heating temperature can vary depending on the braze material used, but in one aspect can be from about 700° C. to about 1200° C. The superabrasive particles in the first and second monolayer are thus arranged such that thermal forces exerted on the metal support layer during heating and cooling are substantially equalize in order to minimize warping.
In one non-limiting example, the superabrasive particles can be bonded to the metal support layer by brazing with a nickel-based alloy containing chromium. In another example, the brazing can include pressing the superabrasive particles with a flat ceramic material that cannot be bonded to the braze in order to level the superabrasive particle tips. Various braze alloys are contemplated, including non-limiting examples such as BNi2, BNi7, and the like.
Additionally, in one aspect at least one of the first and second monolayers of superabrasive particles can be coupled to the metal support layer by an electrodeposition process, and thus the bonding material can be an electrodeposited metal material. As an example of a suitable method for positioning and retaining abrasive materials prior to and during the electrodeposition process, a mold can be used that includes an insulating material that can effectively prevent the accumulation of electrodeposited material on the molding surface. Superabrasive particles can be held on the molding surface of the mold during electro deposition. As such, the accumulation of electrodeposited material can be prevented from occurring on the particle tips and the working surface of the pad conditioner substrate. Such techniques are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/292,938, filed Dec. 2, 2005, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
In another aspect, the superabrasive particles can be bonded to the metal support layer by sintering, and thus the bonding material can include a sintering material. For example, the bonding of the superabrasive particles to the metal support layer can include disposing a sintering compound on the metal support layer in contact with at least one of the first monolayer and the second monolayer and sintering the sintering compound to bond the at least one of the first monolayer and the second monolayer to the metal support layer. Suitable sintering methods will be readily appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art having possession of this disclosure. Basically, a sintering compound is applied around the superabrasive particles and in contact with the metal support layer. The sintering compound can be any known sintering material that can be used to secure superabrasive particles to a substrate. Non-limiting examples of such materials can include metal and metal alloy powders, ceramic powders, and the like. One specific non-limiting example of a sintering compound is cobalt powder.
Once the sintering compound has been applied around the superabrasive particles and to the metal support substrate, heat and in some cases pressure can be applied to cause sintering to occur. In some aspects, a braze or braze alloy can be infiltrated into the sintering compound during bonding to further strengthen the bonding material matrix.
In another aspect, as is shown in
In yet another aspect, as is shown in
The rigid support can be made from any material compatible with the abrading or dressing process. Such materials can include polymeric materials, metal materials, ceramic materials, glasses, composites, and the like. In one aspect, the rigid support can be a polymeric material and the second monolayer of superabrasive particles can be embedded therein using heat, pressure, adhesives, etc. In some aspects, the rigid support can be a non-polymeric material such as a metal layer. In such cases, the superabrasive particles can be bonded to the rigid support by adhesive attachment, soldering, brazing, electroplating, and the like. For brazing techniques, care can be taken to minimize or eliminate warpage in the metal layer during the heating and cooling process. In another aspect, one or more magnetic elements can be placed into the rigid support to attract and hold the CMP pad dresser in place, thus forming a temporary attachment. An optional locking mechanism can be utilized to further immobilize the CMP pad dresser to the rigid support during use. In some aspects the rigid support can include surface features to hold the dresser in place during rotational movement against a CMP pad. The rigid support can have approximately the same diameter as the metal support layer, a larger diameter than the metal support layer, or, in some cases, a smaller diameter than the metal support layer.
In another aspect, a CMP pad dresser can be comprised of a plurality of dressing segments having a plurality of leveled superabrasive particles tips, where the plurality of dressing segments are held in place by a rigid support. Such a design allows a plurality of smaller dressing segments to be manufactured having precisely leveled tips. Smaller diameter metal support layers in these dressing segments can be made by processes involving heat and/or pressure with less warpage due to their smaller size. For example, a 4 inch diameter metal disc can exhibit greater warping due to brazing as compared to a 0.5 inch diameter metal disc. Thus thermal distortion and particle floating problems are decreased. A plurality of such dressing segments can then be coupled to a larger diameter rigid support by processes that do not introduce significant warpage, such as bonding in an organic material. Such dressing segments can have one or more layer(s) of superabrasive particles coupled to a support layer. In one aspect, a segment can have a single layer of superabrasive particles coupled to a metal support layer. In another aspect, a segment can have a layer of superabrasive particles coupled to each side of a metal support layer, as has been described herein. Thus, this process allows the manufacture of CMP pad dressers that can have precise tip protrusion tolerances. Additionally, in one aspect, each dressing segment can have at least three superabrasive particles that protrude to the greatest extent. If the three highest protruding superabrasive particles on every dressing segment are leveled across the entire rigid support, a CMP pad dresser is made having very precise tip leveling across the entire surface. If, for example, ten dressing segments are used to make the CMP pad dresser, then the highest protruding thirty superabrasive particles in the tool will have effectively the same protrusion distance and be substantially leveled. Various additional details regarding dressing segments are detailed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/034,213, filed Feb. 24, 2011, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Various organic materials are contemplated for use as a rigid support and/or to be used to secure the second monolayer of superabrasive particles and/or the dressing segments to the rigid support. Examples of suitable organic matrix materials include, without limitation, amino resins, acrylate resins, alkyd resins, polyester resins, polyamide resins, polyimide resins, polyurethane resins, phenolic resins, phenolic/latex resins, epoxy resins, isocyanate resins, isocyanurate resins, polysiloxane resins, reactive vinyl resins, polyethylene resins, polypropylene resins, polystyrene resins, phenoxy resins, perylene resins, polysulfone resins, acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene resins, acrylic resins, polycarbonate resins, polyimide resins, and mixtures thereof. In one specific aspect, the organic material can be an epoxy resin. In another aspect, the organic material can be a polyimide resin. In yet another aspect, the organic material can be a polyurethane resin.
Additionally, so-called “reverse casting” methods can be used to accurately orient and attach the dressing segments to the rigid support. Such methods can include initially securing the plurality of dressing segments to a substrate using a “mask” material. The portions of the dressing segments protruding from the mask material can then be attached to the rigid support using the methods discussed herein, after which (or during which), the masking material can be removed.
When an organic material is utilized, methods of curing the organic material can be a variety of processes known to one skilled in the art that cause a phase transition in the organic material from at least a pliable state to at least a rigid state. Curing can occur, without limitation, by exposing the organic material to energy in the form of heat, electromagnetic radiation, such as ultraviolet, infrared, and microwave radiation, particle bombardment, such as an electron beam, organic catalysts, inorganic catalysts, or any other curing method known to one skilled in the art.
In one aspect of the present invention, the organic material can be a thermoplastic material. Thermoplastic materials can be reversibly hardened and softened by cooling and heating respectively. In another aspect, the organic material layer may be a thermosetting material. Thermosetting materials cannot be reversibly hardened and softened as with the thermoplastic materials. In other words, once curing has occurred, the process can be essentially irreversible, if desired.
As a more detailed list of what is described above, organic materials that may be useful in embodiments of the present invention include, but are not limited to: amino resins including alkylated urea-formaldehyde resins, melamine-formaldehyde resins, and alkylated benzoguanamine-formaldehyde resins; acrylate resins including vinyl acrylates, acrylated epoxies, acrylated urethanes, acrylated polyesters, acrylated acrylics, acrylated polyethers, vinyl ethers, acrylated oils, acrylated silicons, and associated methacrylates; alkyd resins such as urethane alkyd resins; polyester resins; polyamide resins; polyimide resins; reactive urethane resins; polyurethane resins; phenolic resins such as resole and novolac resins; phenolic/latex resins; epoxy resins such as bisphenol epoxy resins; isocyanate resins; isocyanurate resins; polysiloxane resins including alkylalkoxysilane resins; reactive vinyl resins; resins marketed under the Bakelite™ trade name, including polyethylene resins, polypropylene resins, epoxy resins, phenolic resins, polystyrene resins, phenoxy resins, perylene resins, polysulfone resins, ethylene copolymer resins, acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) resins, acrylic resins, and vinyl resins; acrylic resins; polycarbonate resins; and mixtures and combinations thereof. In one aspect of the present invention, the organic material may be an epoxy resin. In another aspect, the organic material may be a polyimide resin. In yet another aspect, the organic material may be a polyurethane resin.
Numerous additives may be included in the organic material to facilitate its use. For example, additional crosslinking agents and fillers may be used to improve the cured characteristics of the organic material layer. Additionally, solvents may be utilized to alter the characteristics of the organic material in the uncured state. Also, a reinforcing material may be disposed within at least a portion of the solidified organic material layer. Such reinforcing material may function to increase the strength of the organic material layer, and thus further improve the retention of the individual abrasive segments. In one aspect, the reinforcing material may include ceramics, metals, or combinations thereof. Examples of ceramics include alumina, aluminum carbide, silica, silicon carbide, zirconia, zirconium carbide, and mixtures thereof.
Additionally, in one aspect a coupling agent or an organometallic compound may be coated onto the surface of a superabrasive material to facilitate the retention of the superabrasive particles in the organic material via chemical bonding. A wide variety of organic and organometallic compounds is known to those of ordinary skill in the art and may be used. Organometallic coupling agents can form chemicals bonds between the superabrasive materials and the organic material, thus increasing the retention of the superabrasive materials therein. In this way, the organometallic coupling agent can serve as a bridge to form bonds between the organic material and the surface of the superabrasive material. In one aspect of the present invention, the organometallic coupling agent can be a titanate, zirconate, silane, or mixture thereof. The amount of organometallic coupling agent used can depend upon the coupling agent and on the surface area of the superabrasive material. Oftentimes, 0.05% to 10% by weight of the organic material layer can be sufficient.
Specific non-limiting examples of silanes suitable for use in the present invention include: 3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxy silane (available from Dow Corning as Z-6040); γ-methacryloxy propyltrimethoxy silane (available from Union Carbide Chemicals Company as A-174); β-(3,4-epoxycyclohexyl)ethyltrimethoxy silane, γ-aminopropyltriethoxy silane, N-(β-aminoethyl)-γ-aminopropylmethyldimethoxy silane (available from Union Carbide, Shin-etsu Kagaku Kogyo K.K., etc.). Specific non-limiting examples of titanate coupling agents include: isopropyltriisostearoyl titanate, di(cumylphenylate)oxyacetate titanate, 4-aminobenzenesulfonyldodecylbenzenesulfonyl titanate, tetraoctylbis(ditridecylphosphite) titanate, isopropyltri(N-ethylamino-ethylamino) titanate (available from Kenrich Petrochemicals. Inc.), neoalkyoxy titanates such as LICA-01, LICA-09, LICA-28, LICA-44 and LICA-97 (also available from Kenrich), and the like. Specific non-limiting examples of aluminum coupling agents include acetoalkoxy aluminum diisopropylate (available from Ajinomoto K.K.), and the like. Specific non-limiting examples of zirconate coupling agents include: neoalkoxy zirconates, LZ-01, LZ-09, LZ-12, LZ-38, LZ-44, LZ-97 (all available from Kenrich Petrochemicals, Inc.), and the like. Other known organometallic coupling agents, e.g., thiolate based compounds, can be used in the present invention and are considered within the scope of the present invention.
In other aspects of the present disclosure, superabrasive particle tips can be leveled by reducing the protrusions of particles that are outside of the desired tolerance range. Once such particles are identified, various techniques can be utilized to reduce such protrusions. In one aspect, for example, mechanical abrasion of the dresser can reduce the protruding particles. In another aspect, a vibration tool can be used to individually break such particles. In yet another aspect, a laser such as a Nd:YAG laser can be used to disrupt such particles.
In another aspect of the present disclosure, a method of making a CMP pad dresser can include disposing a first monolayer of superabrasive particles on a metal support layer, and disposing a second monolayer of superabrasive particles on the metal support layer on a side opposite the first monolayer. The superabrasive particles of the second monolayer are positioned to have substantially the same distribution as the superabrasive particles of the first monolayer. The method can further include bonding the first monolayer of superabrasive particles and the second monolayer of superabrasive particles to the metal support layer such that symmetrical forces due to the substantially similar distribution between the first monolayer and the second monolayer precludes substantial warping of the metal support layer.
In yet another aspect, disposing at least one of the first monolayer of superabrasive particles or the second monolayer of superabrasive particles can include adhering a plurality of superabrasive particles to an adhesive transfer sheet in a predetermined pattern established by apertures in a template, and removing the template from the adhesive transfer sheet such that the plurality of superabrasive particles remain adhered to the adhesive transfer sheet in the predetermined pattern. The plurality of superabrasive particles is then transferred with the adhesive transfer sheet to the metal support layer, and the adhesive transfer sheet is removed from the plurality of superabrasive particles to form at least one of the first monolayer of superabrasive particles or the second monolayer of superabrasive particles.
In a further aspect of the present disclosure, a method of minimizing warpage of a CMP pad dresser during manufacture can include substantially equalizing warping forces on opposing sides of a metal support layer during bonding of a plurality of superabrasive particles thereto, wherein warpage of the support layer is minimized during bonding due to the equalized forces on opposing sides. In one aspect, substantially equalizing forces includes arranging the plurality of superabrasive particles on opposing sides of the support layer such that the plurality of superabrasive particles has substantially the same distribution on either side of the support layer to substantially equalize warping forces during bonding.
In yet a further aspect of the present disclosure, a CMP pad dresser can include a plurality of superabrasive particles arranged as a working surface, where the difference in protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the second highest protruding tip of the first monolayer of superabrasive particles is less than or equal to about 20 microns, and where the difference in protrusion distance between the highest 1% of the protruding tips of the first monolayer of superabrasive particles, excluding the highest protruding tip, are within about 80 microns.
In another aspect, a CMP pad dresser can include a plurality of superabrasive particles arranged as a working surface, where the difference in protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the second highest protruding tip is less than or equal to about 10 microns, the difference in protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the 10th highest protruding tip is less than or equal to about 20 microns, the difference in protrusion distance between the highest protruding tip and the 100th highest protruding tip is less than or equal to about 40 microns, and the highest protruding tip has a protrusion distance of greater than or equal to about 50 microns.
It is noted that, while the above disclosure refers primarily to CMP pad dressers, other precision grinding and/or abrading tools are considered to be within the present scope. As such, the techniques and teaching disclosed herein can additionally be applied to such tools.
Additionally, it is noted that traditional CMP processing techniques, including pad dressing, has limited the critical dimension of integrated circuits. The presently disclosed CMP dressing devices and techniques can, however, allows processing of wafers having integrated circuit critical dimensions of less than or equal to 45 nm, 32 nm, 28 nm, or 22 nm.
Of course, it is to be understood that the above-described arrangements are only illustrative of the application of the principles of the present invention. Numerous modifications and alternative arrangements may be devised by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention and the appended claims are intended to cover such modifications and arrangements. Thus, while the present invention has been described above with particularity and detail in connection with what is presently deemed to be the most practical and preferred embodiments of the invention, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that numerous modifications, including, but not limited to, variations in size, materials, shape, form, function and manner of operation, assembly and use may be made without departing from the principles and concepts set forth herein.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/489,074, filed on May 23, 2011, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
187593 | Brown et al. | Feb 1877 | A |
1854071 | Schacht | Apr 1932 | A |
1988065 | Wooddell | Jan 1935 | A |
2027087 | Buckner | Jan 1936 | A |
2027307 | Schacht | Jan 1936 | A |
2033991 | Melton | Mar 1936 | A |
2035521 | Benner | Mar 1936 | A |
RE20660 | Schacht | Feb 1938 | E |
2184348 | Kirchner | Dec 1939 | A |
2187624 | Melton | Jan 1940 | A |
2194253 | Benner | Mar 1940 | A |
2268663 | Kuzmick | Jan 1942 | A |
2281558 | Cross | May 1942 | A |
2307461 | Guth | Jan 1943 | A |
2318570 | Carlton | May 1943 | A |
2334572 | Melton | Nov 1943 | A |
2612348 | Catallo | Sep 1952 | A |
2725693 | Smith | Dec 1955 | A |
2811960 | Fessel | Nov 1957 | A |
2867086 | Haley | Jan 1959 | A |
2876086 | Raymond | Mar 1959 | A |
2947608 | Hall | Aug 1960 | A |
2652951 | Simpson | Sep 1960 | A |
2952951 | Simpson | Sep 1960 | A |
3067551 | Maginnis | Dec 1962 | A |
3121981 | Hurst | Feb 1964 | A |
3127715 | Christensen | Apr 1964 | A |
3146560 | Hurst | Sep 1964 | A |
3276852 | Lemelson | Oct 1966 | A |
3293012 | Smiley | Dec 1966 | A |
3372010 | Parsons | Mar 1968 | A |
3377411 | Charvat | Apr 1968 | A |
3416560 | Bruno | Dec 1968 | A |
3440774 | Curn | Apr 1969 | A |
3593382 | Miller | Jul 1971 | A |
3608134 | Cook | Sep 1971 | A |
3625666 | James | Dec 1971 | A |
3630699 | Catlin | Dec 1971 | A |
3631638 | Yoshikawa et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
3664662 | Linz | May 1972 | A |
3706650 | Eisner | Dec 1972 | A |
2078354 | Webster | Apr 1973 | A |
3743489 | Wentorf et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
3767371 | Wentorf et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3802130 | Lindenbeck | Apr 1974 | A |
3819814 | Pope | Jun 1974 | A |
3852078 | Wakatsuki et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3894673 | Lowder et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
3982358 | Fukuda | Sep 1976 | A |
4018576 | Lowder et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4078906 | Green | Mar 1978 | A |
4149881 | D'Silva | Apr 1979 | A |
4151154 | Berger | Apr 1979 | A |
4155721 | Fletcher | May 1979 | A |
4182628 | D'Silva | Jan 1980 | A |
4188194 | Gorrigan | Feb 1980 | A |
4201601 | D'Silva | May 1980 | A |
4211294 | Multakh | Jul 1980 | A |
4211924 | Muller et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4224380 | Bovenkerk et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4228214 | Steigelman et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4229186 | Wilson | Oct 1980 | A |
4273561 | Villalobos | Jun 1981 | A |
4287168 | Wentorf et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4289503 | Corrigan | Sep 1981 | A |
4341532 | Oide | Jul 1982 | A |
4355489 | Heyer et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4405411 | Inoue et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4481016 | Campbell et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4525179 | Gigl | Jun 1985 | A |
4547257 | Iizuka et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4551195 | Iizuka et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4565034 | Sekiya | Jan 1986 | A |
4610699 | Yazu et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4617181 | Yazu et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4629373 | Hall | Dec 1986 | A |
4632817 | Yazu et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4662896 | Dennis | May 1987 | A |
4669522 | Griffin | Jun 1987 | A |
4680199 | Vontell et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4712552 | Pangburn | Dec 1987 | A |
4737162 | Grazen | Apr 1988 | A |
4749514 | Murakami et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4770907 | Kimura | Sep 1988 | A |
4776861 | Frushour | Oct 1988 | A |
4780274 | Barr | Oct 1988 | A |
4797241 | Peterson et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4828582 | Frushour | May 1989 | A |
4849602 | Gardner | Jul 1989 | A |
4863573 | Moore et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4866888 | Murai et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4883500 | Deakins et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4908046 | Wiand | Mar 1990 | A |
4916869 | Oliver | Apr 1990 | A |
4923490 | Johnson et al. | May 1990 | A |
4925457 | deKok et al. | May 1990 | A |
4927619 | Tsuji | May 1990 | A |
4943488 | Sung et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4945686 | Wiand | Aug 1990 | A |
4949511 | Endo et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4954139 | Cerutti | Sep 1990 | A |
4968326 | Wiand | Nov 1990 | A |
5000273 | Horton et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5011513 | Zador et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5022895 | Wiand | Jun 1991 | A |
5024680 | Chen et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5030276 | Sung et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5037451 | Burnand et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5043120 | Corrigan | Aug 1991 | A |
5049165 | Tselesin | Sep 1991 | A |
5092082 | Padberg | Mar 1992 | A |
5092910 | deKok et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5116568 | Sung | May 1992 | A |
5131924 | Wiand | Jul 1992 | A |
5133782 | Wiand | Jul 1992 | A |
5137543 | Heath et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5151107 | Cho et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5164247 | Solanki et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5176155 | Rudolph, Jr. | Jan 1993 | A |
5190568 | Tselesin | Mar 1993 | A |
5194070 | Sumiya et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5194071 | Corrigan et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5195403 | Sani et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5195404 | Notter et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5197249 | Wiand | Mar 1993 | A |
5203881 | Wiand | Apr 1993 | A |
5232320 | Tank et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5243790 | Gagne | Sep 1993 | A |
5246884 | Jaso | Sep 1993 | A |
5247765 | Quintana | Sep 1993 | A |
5248317 | Tank | Sep 1993 | A |
5264011 | Brown et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5266236 | Bovenkerk | Nov 1993 | A |
5271547 | Carlson | Dec 1993 | A |
5273730 | Yoshida et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5295402 | Bovenkerk | Mar 1994 | A |
5314513 | Miller | May 1994 | A |
5328548 | Tsuji et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5364423 | Bigelow et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5374293 | Takashita et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5380390 | Tselesin | Jan 1995 | A |
5443032 | Vichr et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5453106 | Roberts | Sep 1995 | A |
5454343 | Eun et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5458754 | Sathrum et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5486131 | Cesna et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5492771 | Lowder et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5492774 | Tateno et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5496386 | Broberg et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5500248 | Iacovangelo et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5505272 | Clark | Apr 1996 | A |
5518443 | Fisher | May 1996 | A |
5527424 | Mullins | Jun 1996 | A |
5536202 | Appel et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5547417 | Breivogel et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5551959 | Martin et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5560745 | Roberts | Oct 1996 | A |
5560754 | Johnson et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5609286 | Anthon | Mar 1997 | A |
5620489 | Tselesin | Apr 1997 | A |
5660894 | Chen et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5669943 | Horton et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5674572 | Sarin et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5725421 | Goers et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5746931 | Graebner | May 1998 | A |
RE35812 | Oliver | Jun 1998 | E |
5772756 | Davies et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5776214 | Wood | Jul 1998 | A |
5779743 | Wood | Jul 1998 | A |
5791975 | Cesna et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5801073 | Robbins et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5816891 | Woo | Oct 1998 | A |
5820450 | Calhoun | Oct 1998 | A |
5833519 | Moore | Nov 1998 | A |
5851138 | Hempel, Jr. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855314 | Shiue et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5868806 | Nishio et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5885137 | Ploessl | Mar 1999 | A |
5902173 | Tanaka | May 1999 | A |
5916011 | Kim | Jun 1999 | A |
5919084 | Powell et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5921856 | Zimmer | Jul 1999 | A |
5924917 | Benedict et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5961373 | Lai | Oct 1999 | A |
5975988 | Christianson | Nov 1999 | A |
5976001 | Powell et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5976205 | Andrews et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980852 | Gurns et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980982 | Degawa et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5985228 | Corrigan et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6001008 | Fujimori et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6001174 | Fang | Dec 1999 | A |
6024824 | Krech | Feb 2000 | A |
6027659 | Billett | Feb 2000 | A |
6030595 | Sumiya et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6039641 | Sung | Mar 2000 | A |
6054183 | Zimmer et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6093280 | Kirchner et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6106382 | Sakaguchi | Aug 2000 | A |
6123612 | Goers | Sep 2000 | A |
6125612 | Main | Oct 2000 | A |
6159087 | Birang et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6159286 | Sung | Dec 2000 | A |
6179886 | Gordeev et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6190240 | Kinoshita et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6196911 | Preston et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6200360 | Imai et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206942 | Wood et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6213856 | Cho et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217413 | Christianson | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224469 | Ohmori et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6258138 | DeVoe et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6258201 | Krech | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6258237 | Gal-Or et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6281129 | Easter et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6284556 | Wang et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6286498 | Sung | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293854 | Kimura et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299508 | Gagliardi et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6299521 | Morimura et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312324 | Mitsui et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319108 | Adefris et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325709 | Nanda et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6346202 | Molnar | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6354918 | Togawa et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6354929 | Adefris et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6368198 | Sung et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371838 | Holzapfel | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371842 | Romero | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6372001 | Omar et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6394886 | Chen et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6409580 | Lougher et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6416878 | An | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6439986 | Myoung et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446740 | Eyre | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6458018 | Goers et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6478831 | Tselesin | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6497853 | Davies et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6544599 | Brown et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551176 | Garretson | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6605798 | Cullen | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6607423 | Areayan et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6616725 | Cho et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626167 | Kim et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6627168 | Ohsubo et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629884 | Goers | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6672943 | Vogtmann | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6679243 | Sung | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6692547 | Kim | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6694847 | Hiroyasu et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6722952 | Goers et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6749485 | James et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6755720 | Ishizaki et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6769969 | Duescher | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6790126 | Wood et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6818029 | Myoung et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6824455 | Osterheld et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6835365 | Davies et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6837979 | Uzho et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6884155 | Sung et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6899592 | Kojima et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6905571 | Sakuma et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6945857 | Doan et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6979357 | Fries et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7021995 | Toge et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7033408 | Fries et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7044990 | Ishizaki et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7066795 | Balagani et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7067903 | Tachibana et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7124753 | Sung | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7150677 | Yamashita et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7198553 | Goers | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7201645 | Sung | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7247577 | Palmgren et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7258708 | Sung | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7261621 | Moon et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7323049 | Sung | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7368013 | Sung | May 2008 | B2 |
7384436 | Sung | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7404857 | Sung | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7465217 | Kinoshita et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7494404 | Sung | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7507267 | Hall et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7585366 | Sung | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7641538 | Goers | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7651368 | Kendall et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7651386 | Sung | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7658666 | Sung | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7690971 | Sung | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7762872 | Sung | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7791188 | Sung | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7840305 | Behr et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7954483 | Kim et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8104464 | Sung | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8377158 | Palmgren et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8393934 | Sung | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8398466 | Sung et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8545583 | Duescher | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8777699 | Sung | Jul 2014 | B2 |
20010003884 | Wei et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010009844 | Cho et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010046835 | Wielonski et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020014041 | Baldonai et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020042200 | Fawcett | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020127962 | Cho et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020139680 | George | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020164928 | Tolles | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020173234 | Sung et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020182401 | Lawing | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030054746 | Nussbaumer | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030084894 | Sung | May 2003 | A1 |
20030092357 | Yoon et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030114094 | Myoung et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030207659 | Annen et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040009742 | Lin et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040023610 | Hu et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040060243 | Fries et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040079033 | Long | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040091627 | Ohara et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040107648 | Sung | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040180617 | Goers | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040203325 | Donohue | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040235406 | Duescher | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040238946 | Tachibana et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050032462 | Gagliardi et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050032469 | Duescher | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050060941 | Provow | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050095959 | Sung | May 2005 | A1 |
20050118939 | Duescher | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050215188 | Toge et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050227590 | Sung | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050260939 | Andrews et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060073774 | Sung | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060079160 | Balagani et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060079162 | Yamashita et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060128288 | An et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060135050 | Petersen et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143991 | Sung | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060213128 | Sung | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060254154 | Huang et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060258276 | Sung | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070051354 | Sung | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070051355 | Sung | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070060026 | Sung | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070066194 | Wielonski et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070093181 | Lugg et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070128994 | Sung | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070155298 | Sung | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070232074 | Ravi et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070249270 | Sung | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070254566 | Sung | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070264918 | Sung | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070266639 | Sung | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070295267 | Sung | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080014845 | Yimaz et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080076338 | Andrews et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080096479 | Sung | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080153398 | Sung | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080171503 | Sung | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080271384 | Puthanangady | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080292869 | Sung | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080296756 | Koch et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090068937 | Sung | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090093195 | Sung | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090094902 | Hou | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090123705 | Sung | May 2009 | A1 |
20090145045 | Sung | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090215363 | Sung | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090283089 | Sung | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100015898 | An et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100022174 | Chou et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100139174 | Sung | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100186479 | Borucki et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100203811 | Philipossian et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100221990 | Sung | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100248595 | Dinh-Ngoc et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100248596 | Sung | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100261419 | Sung | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110076925 | Sung | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110104989 | Boutaghou et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110192652 | Shen et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110212670 | Sung | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110252710 | Hall et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110275288 | Sung | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110293905 | Sung | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110296766 | Sung | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120192499 | Sung | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120241943 | Sung | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120244790 | Sung | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120260582 | Sung | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120302146 | Sung | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130225052 | Song et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1351922 | Jun 2002 | CN |
1494984 | May 2004 | CN |
0238434 | Mar 1987 | EP |
0264674 | Sep 1987 | EP |
0280657 | Aug 1988 | EP |
0331344 | Feb 1989 | EP |
0712941 | May 1996 | EP |
1075898 | Feb 2001 | EP |
2239011 | Jun 1991 | GB |
2366804 | Mar 2002 | GB |
06182184 | Jul 1994 | JP |
10128654 | May 1998 | JP |
10180618 | Jul 1998 | JP |
11048122 | Feb 1999 | JP |
11077536 | Mar 1999 | JP |
2000167774 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000343436 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2003071718 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2007-044823 | Feb 2007 | JP |
2007044823 | Feb 2007 | JP |
2004025401 | Jan 2009 | JP |
1020020036138 | May 2002 | KR |
200339181 | Jan 2004 | KR |
1020070063569 | Jun 2007 | KR |
WO 9427883 | Dec 1994 | WO |
WO 9527596 | Oct 1995 | WO |
WO 9531006 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO 9606732 | Mar 1996 | WO |
WO 9810897 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9851448 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9845091 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 9845092 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 0231078 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO 2004094106 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2006039413 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO2006124792 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2007032946 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO2008063599 | May 2008 | WO |
WO 2009043058 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO 2009064677 | May 2009 | WO |
WO 2012040374 | Mar 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT/US2012/039199; filed May 23, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; International Search Report dated Dec. 18, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/362,917, filed Jan. 13, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Dec. 31, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/168,110, filed Jul. 5, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; notice of allowance dated Jan. 18, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,198, filed Sep. 21, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Jul. 23, 2013. |
PCT/US2013/042538; filed May 23, 2013; Chien-Min Sung; international search report dated Aug. 27, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/726,786, filed Mar. 18, 2010; Chien-Min Sung; notice of allowance dated Sep. 4, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/255,823, filed Oct. 22, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; notice of allowance dated Dec. 26, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/726,786, filed Mar. 18, 2010; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Mar. 19, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/362,917, filed Jan. 31, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Apr. 10, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/407,634, filed Feb. 28, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Jun. 13, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/239, 189, filed Sep. 21, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Dec. 21, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/059,422, filed Mar. 31, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Jan. 24, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/153,176, filed Jun. 3, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Dec. 6, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/715,583, filed Mar. 2, 2010; Chien-Min Sung; notice of allowance dated Dec. 7, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/113,779, filed May 23, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Nov. 12, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/021,350, filed Feb. 4, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Mar. 20, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,189, filed Sep. 21, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; notice of allowance dated May 3, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/267,172, filed Nov. 7, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; notice of allowance dated Jan. 7, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,189, filed Sep. 21, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; notice of allowance dated Mar. 4, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/644,790, filed Oct. 4, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Jun. 17, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/416,201, filed Mar. 9, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Jun. 18, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/153,176, filed Jun. 3, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Jul. 1, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/113,779, filed May 23, 2011; Chien-Min Sung office action dated Jul. 2, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/794,164, filed Mar. 11, 2013; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Jul. 16, 2014. |
Colmonoy Technical Data Sheet; No. DSP-A; 1993. |
Endecott's Specifications; 2004. |
Kennametal Specification for DMHPM002 Hot Press Matrix N-50 Dec. 6, 2001. |
Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS), Wall Colmonoy Corporation; prepared Jul. 20, 1989. |
Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS); Kennametal; issued Jun. 11, 2004. |
Sung et al.; The Eastern Wind of Diamond Synthesis; New Diamond and Frontier Carpon Technology; 2003; pp. 47-61; vol. 13, No. 1. |
Sung et al; Mechanism of the Solvent-Assisted Graphite to Diamond Transition Under High Pressure: Implications for the Selection of Catalysts, High Temperatures-High Pressure; 1995/1996; pp. 523-546; vol. 27/28. |
Syndite, CTM302; Announcement, Elementsix Advancing Diamond; Jan. 14, 2003; http://www.e6.com/en/resourches/announcementsheets/CTM302.pdf; as accessed on Dec. 16, 2008. |
Sung et al.; The Eastern Wind of Diamond Symthesis; New Diamond and Frontier Carpon Technology; 2003; pp. 47-61; vol. 13, No. 1. |
Syndite, Elementsix Advancing Diamond; 2 pages; Jan. 14, 2003. |
U.S. Appl. No. 08/832,852, filed Apr. 4, 1997; Chien-Min Sung. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/447,620, filed Nov. 22, 1999; Chien-Min Sung. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/512,755, filed Aug. 29, 2006; Chien-Min Sung. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/239,198, filed Sep. 21, 2011; Chien-Min Sung. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/416,201, filed Mar. 9, 2012; Chien-Min Sung. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/479,148, filed May 23, 2012; Chien-Min Sung. |
Yasinaga et al; Advances in Abrasive Technology, III; Soc. of Grinding Engineers (SGE) in Japan; 2000. |
PCT Application PCT/US2011/052627; filed Sep. 21, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; International Search Report mailed May 11, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/362,917, filed Jan. 31, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Jun. 14, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/168,110, filed Jul. 5, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated May 14, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/059,422, filed Mar. 30, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Aug. 22, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/255,823, filed Oct. 21, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; notice of allowance dated Sep. 21, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/168,110, filed Jul. 5, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; notice of allowance dated Sep. 28, 2012. |
PCT Application PCT/US2007/024165; filed Nov. 16, 2007; Chien-Min Sung; Internaitonal Search Report mailed May 23, 2011. |
PCT Application PCT/US2011/052626; filed Sep. 21, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; International Search Report mailed May 2, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/255,823, filed Oct. 22, 2005; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued Mar. 7, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/267,172, filed Nov. 7, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued Jan. 3, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/267,172, filed Jan. 31, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued Jul. 9, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/715,583, filed Mar. 2, 2010; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued Mar. 21, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/715,583; filed Mar. 2, 2010; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued Aug. 9, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/715,583, filed Mar. 2, 2010; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued Oct. 25, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/328,338, filed Dec. 4, 2008; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued May 10, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/021,350, filed Feb. 4, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued Aug. 31, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/021,350, filed Feb. 4, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; office action issued Feb. 7, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/113/779, filed May 23, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Oct. 9, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/153,176, filed Jun. 3, 2011; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Oct. 10, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/407,634, filed Feb. 28, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Oct. 29, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/802,112, filed Mar. 13, 2013; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Nov. 6, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/644,790, filed Oct. 4, 2012; Chien-Min Sung; office action dated Dec. 24, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120302146 A1 | Nov 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61489074 | May 2011 | US |