Patent Grant
10840112
The present invention relates to a specialized yttrium oxide comprising solid solution ceramic which is highly resistant to plasmas in general, particularly resistant to corrosive plasmas of the kind used in the etching of semiconductor substrates.
This section describes background subject matter related to the disclosed embodiments of the present invention. There is no intention, either express or implied, that the background art discussed in this section legally constitutes prior art.
Corrosion (including erosion) resistance is a critical property for apparatus components and liners used in semiconductor processing chambers, where corrosive environments are present. Example of corrosive plasma environments include plasmas used for cleaning of processing apparatus and plasmas used to etch semiconductor substrates. Plasmas used for plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition processes often tend to be corrosive as well. This is especially true where high-energy plasma is present and combined with chemical reactivity to act upon the surface of components present in the environment. The reduced chemical reactivity of an apparatus component surface or of a liner surface is also an important property when corrosive gases alone are in contact with processing apparatus surfaces.
Process chambers and component apparatus present within processing chambers which are used in the fabrication of electronic devices and micro-electro-mechanical structures (MEMS) are frequently constructed from aluminum and aluminum alloys. Surfaces of a process chamber and component apparatus present within the chamber are frequently anodized to provide a degree of protection from the corrosive environment. However, the integrity of the anodization layer may be deteriorated by impurities in the aluminum or aluminum alloy, so that corrosion begins to occur early, shortening the life span of the protective coating. Ceramic coatings of various compositions have been used in place of the aluminum oxide layer mentioned above, and have been used over the surface of the anodized layer to improve the protection of the underlying aluminum-based materials. However, current materials used for protective layers deteriorate over time and eventually leave the aluminum alloy subject to attack by the plasma, even though the life span of the protective layer is extended over that of anodized aluminum.
Yttrium oxide is a ceramic material which has shown considerable promise in the protection of aluminum and aluminum alloy surfaces which are exposed to fluorine-containing plasmas of the kind used in the fabrication of semiconductor devices. A yttrium oxide coating has been used and applied over an anodized surface of a high purity aluminum alloy process chamber surface, or a process component surface, to produce excellent corrosion protection (e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 6,776,873, mentioned above). In one application, the '873 Patent provides a processing chamber component resistant to a plasma including fluorine and oxygen species. The processing chamber component typically comprises: a high purity aluminum substrate, where particulates formed from mobile impurities present in the aluminum are carefully controlled to have a particular size distribution; an anodized coating on a surface of the high purity aluminum substrate; and, a protective coating comprising yttrium oxide overlying the anodized coating. The protective coating may include aluminum oxide up to about 10% by weight, and typically comprises 99.95% by weight or greater yttrium oxide. The protective coating is typically applied using a method such as spray coating, chemical vapor deposition, or physical vapor deposition.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,798,016 describes the use of aluminum oxide as a coating layer for chamber walls or as a coating layer for a chamber liner. The '016 Patent further discloses that since aluminum is reactive with a number of plasmas, it is recommended that aluminum oxide or a coating thereof be disposed on the liner or chamber walls because aluminum oxide tends to be chemically inert. In addition, a protective coating may be applied over the surfaces of the liner and/or chamber walls. Examples which are given include Al2O3, Sc2O3, or Y2O3.
U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2001/0003271 A1 discloses a film of Al2O3, or Al2O3 and Y2O3, formed on an inner wall surface of the chamber and on those exposed surfaces of the members within the chamber which require a high corrosion resistance and insulating property. An example is given of a processing chamber where a base material of the chamber may be a ceramic material (Al2O3, SiO2, AlN, etc.), aluminum, or stainless steel, or other metal or metal alloy, which has a sprayed film over the base material. The film may be made of a compound of a III-B element of the periodic table, such as Y2O3. The film may substantially comprise Al2O3 and Y2O3. A sprayed film of yttrium-aluminum-garnet (YAG) is also mentioned. The sprayed film thickness is said to range from 50 μm to 300 μm.
In another application, a ceramic composition of matter comprising a ceramic compound (e.g. Al2O3) and an oxide of a Group IIIB metal (e.g. Y2O3) has been used for a dielectric window of a reactor chamber where substrates are processed in a plasma of a processing gas (e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 6,352,611). The ceramic compound may be selected from silicon carbide, silicon nitride, boron carbide, boron nitride, aluminum nitride, aluminum oxide, and mixtures thereof; however, aluminum oxide is said to be available in a pure form which does not outgas. The Group IIIB metal may be selected from the group consisting of scandium, yttrium, the cerium subgroup, and the yttrium subgroup; however, yttrium is preferred, with the oxide being yttrium oxide. The preferred process for forming or producing the dielectric member is by thermal processing of a powdered raw mixture comprising the ceramic compound, the oxide of a Group IIIB metal, a suitable additive agent, and a suitable binder agent.
In another application, a protective coating for a semiconductor processing apparatus component is described. The protective coating comprises aluminum or an aluminum alloy, where the coating includes a material selected from, for example, but not limited to: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (YAG); an oxide of an element selected from the group consisting of Y, Sc, La, Ce, Eu, and Dy; a fluoride of an element selected from the group consisting of Y, Sc, La, Ce, Eu, and Dy; and combinations thereof is used (e.g. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/898,113 of Sun et al., filed Jul. 22, 2004, mentioned above). The coating is applied to a substrate surface by thermal/flame spraying, plasma spraying, sputtering, or chemical vapor deposition (CVD). The coating is placed in compression by applying the coating at a substrate surface temperature of at least about 150-200° C.
The kinds of protective coatings described above have been used to protect exposed surfaces of a plasma source gas distribution plate of the kind used in semiconductor and MEMS processing apparatuses. However, due to the concentration of reactive species which are present at the surface of the gas distribution plate, the lifetime of the gas distribution plate has typically been limited, from about 8 processing days to about 80 processing days, depending on the corrosivity of the plasma created in the processing chamber. To increase the lifetime of a component such as a gas distribution plate, a gas distribution plate was fabricated from a solid yttrium oxide-comprising substrate, as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/918,232 of Sun et al., mentioned above. The solid yttrium oxide-comprising substrate contains up to about 10% aluminum oxide in some instances. The solid yttrium oxide-comprising substrate typically comprises about 99.99% yttrium oxide.
As device geometry continues to shrink, the on-wafer defect requirements become more stringent, as particulate generation from apparatus within the processing chamber increases in importance. For plasma dry etch chambers running various halogen, oxygen, and nitrogen chemistries, such as F, Cl, Br, O, N, and various combinations thereof, for example, the selection of the material used for apparatus components and chamber liners becomes more critical. The materials with good plasma resistance performance (which also have adequate mechanical, electrical and thermal properties), can reduce particle generation, metal contamination, and provide prolonged component life. This translates to low costs of manufacturing, reduced wafer defects, increased lifetime, and increased mean time between cleaning. Ceramic materials which have been used in such applications include Al2O3, AlN, and SiC. However, the plasma resistance properties of these ceramic materials is not adequate in many instances, particularly when a fluorine plasma source gas is involved. The recent introduction of Y2O3 ceramic shows improved plasma resistance properties, but this material generally exhibits weak mechanical properties that limits its applications for general use in semiconductor processing components, processing kits, and chamber liners.
Semiconductor processing conditions expose semiconductor processing apparatus, such as the interior of processing chambers and the surfaces of components within the processing chambers, to a variety of chemical reagents and plasma ions which attack processing apparatus surfaces. The effect of the attack on an apparatus surface is frequently referred to as erosion of the apparatus surface. It is possible to reduce the erosion rate by selecting a particular material composition for the apparatus surfaces. A protective material may be applied as a coating over the apparatus surface; however, this may not be the best solution to avoiding erosion. The coating is constantly getting thinner (eroding) during a plasma etch, and there is an increased risk that the substrate beneath the coating will be attacked by the plasma penetrating the coating layer. The coating layer may flake off during plasma processing due to residual stress. While such problems will be significantly reduced by using a coating of the erosion-resistant materials described in embodiments herein, in many instances it may be advantageous to form an entire apparatus component from the erosion-resistant materials. However, frequently the materials which are more erosion-resistant are more crystalline, and an improvement in erosion resistance comes at a cost, in the form of decreased mechanical properties (such as ductility) of the apparatus. Ceramic materials which are formed from an oxide of a Group IIIA, IIIB, IVB and VB element, or combinations thereof, have been demonstrated to provide erosion resistance to halogen-comprising plasmas. Embodiments of the present invention pertain to reducing the erosion rate of a ceramic material, typically comprising a Group IIIA, IIIB, IVB, or a Group VB element, or combinations thereof, while maintaining acceptable mechanical properties or improving mechanical properties of the component parts made of the ceramic material.
In one embodiment, sintered ceramics are formed which contain a single solid solution phase or which are multi-phase, such as two phase and three phase. The multi-phase ceramics typically contain a yttrium aluminate phase and one or two solid solution phases formed from yttrium oxide, zirconium oxide and/or rare earth oxides. The sintered ceramic has been evaluated under various plasma processing conditions to determine erosion resistance. The materials which were erosion tested were also tested for mechanical properties. For example, ceramic materials formed from starting compositions in which the Y2O3, yttrium oxide, molar concentration ranges from about 50 mole % to about 75 mole %; the ZrO2, zirconium oxide, molar concentration ranges from about 10 mole % to about 30 mole %; and, the Al2O3, aluminum oxide, molar concentration ranges from about 10 mole % to about 30 mole % provide excellent erosion resistance to halogen-containing plasmas while providing advanced mechanical properties which enable handling of solid ceramic processing components with less concern about damage to a component. In many embodiments, a starting composition for the ceramic materials may be one that comprises Y2O3 molar concentration ranges from about 55 mole % to about 65 mole %, ZrO2 molar concentration ranges from about 15 mole % to about 25 mole %, and Al2O3 molar concentration ranges from about 10 mole % to about 25 mole %. When the erosion rate is of great concern, the starting material concentration of the ceramic material may be one that comprises Y2O3 molar concentration ranges from about 55 mole % to about 65 mole %, the ZrO2 molar concentration ranges from about 20 mole % to about 25 mole % and the Al2O3 molar concentration 10 mole % to about 15 mole %. In one embodiment, to produce a solid apparatus component, these starting material formulations are compacted into a pelletized form and are sintered using a method selected from pressureless sintering, hot-press sintering (HP), or hot isostatic press sintering (HIP). These sintering techniques are well known in the art.
In other embodiments, the starting material compositions listed above may be used to form a ceramic coating over the surface of a variety of metal and ceramic substrates, including, but not limited to, aluminum, aluminum alloy, stainless steel, alumina, aluminum nitride and quartz, using a technique well known in the art, such as plasma spraying, for example and not by way of limitation. Typically the aluminum alloy used is a high purity aluminum alloy of the kind described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,776,873, mentioned above. However, with the improved mechanical properties which have been obtained, it is recommended that solid ceramic apparatus components be used when possible, to avoid the eventual failure of the apparatus to function properly due to interfacial problems between the coating and the underlying substrate, or to prevent a sudden failure of plasma resistance due to the coating layer flaking off, or to prevent plasma penetration of the coating layer through defects which may be exposed from within the coating layer as the coating layer becomes thinner due to erosion.
The addition of zirconium oxide powder to yttrium oxide powder at a concentration of zirconium oxide, ranging from about 0.1 mole % to about 65 mole %, after consolidation by conventional ceramic processing, provides a single solid solution with a cubic yttria crystal structure phase or a cubic fluorite-type crystal structure phase, or provides a mixed solid solution of cubic yttria crystal structure phase and cubic fluorite-type crystal structure phase. For the cubic yttria crystal structure, the cell parameter of the solid solution is smaller than that of the pure cubic yttrium oxide crystalline structure, due to the formation of yttrium vacancy. For the cubic fluorite-type crystal structure, the cell parameter of the solid solution is smaller than that of the pure cubic fluorite-type structure, due to the formation of oxygen vacancy. The smaller cell parameter improves the plasma resistance properties of the solid solution of zirconium oxide in yttrium oxide. For example, the erosion rate of a pure solid yttrium oxide ceramic in a CF4/CHF3 plasma is about 0.3 μm/hr. The erosion rate (the rate at which a surface is removed in μm (of thickness)/hr) of a solid ceramic of about 69 mole % yttrium oxide and about 31 mole % zirconium oxide is about 0.1 μm/hr, a 3 times slower erosion rate than pure solid yttrium oxide. This unexpected decrease in erosion rate extends the lifetime of a process chamber liner or an internal apparatus component within the process chamber, so that the replacement frequency for such apparatus is reduced, reducing apparatus down time; and, the particle and metal contamination level generated during a plasma process is reduced, enabling a device fabrication with ever shrinking geometry with reduced overall cost of the processing apparatus per wafer processed, on the average.
While the 0.1 μm/hr erosion rate for the zirconium oxide-containing yttrium oxide solid solution is surprisingly better than that of yttrium oxide at 0.3 μm/hr, and considerably better than of a solid aluminum oxide ceramic at 1.44 μm/hr in the CF4/CHF3 plasma, the mechanical properties of the zirconium oxide-containing yttrium oxide solid solution illustrate that an improvement in flexural strength and fracture toughness would be helpful.
In one embodiment, the flexural strength and fracture toughness of the zirconium oxide-containing yttrium oxide solid solution are achieved, by adding various amounts of aluminum oxide to the formula for the solid solution ceramic to form an additional yttrium aluminate phase. The mixture of oxides was pelletized by unidirectional mechanical pressing or cold isostatic pressing of a granular powder formed by spray drying, in combination with a typical content of binders. The green body was then pressureless sintered using techniques generally known in the art. The addition of 10 mole % to 30 mole % of alumina significantly improved the mechanical properties of the sintered ceramic composition in terms of flexural strength and fracture toughness, as discussed subsequently herein. This surprising change in mechanical properties, which indicates that fabricated parts could be handled with less risk of fracture, was achieved with minimal effect on the plasma erosion rate of the ceramic material. For example, the erosion rate of the ceramic containing 69 mole % yttrium oxide and 31 mole % zirconium oxide, after exposure to a plasma containing CF4 and CHF3, was about 0.1 μm/hr. For the ceramic containing about 14 mole % aluminum oxide, the erosion rate after exposure to the same plasma was also about 0.1 μm/hr. For the ceramic containing about 25 mole % aluminum oxide, the erosion rate after exposure to the same plasma was about 0.22 μm/hr. The relationship between aluminum oxide content, increase in flexural strength, and increase in erosion rate is not a linear relationship. However, one of skill in the art can optimize the formula with minimal experimentation, in view of the information provided herein.
As an alternative to adding aluminum oxide to a multi-phase metal stable composition containing yttrium oxide and zirconium oxide, it is possible to add HfO2, hafnium oxide; Sc2O3, scandium oxide; Nd2O3, neodymium oxide; Nb2O5, niobium oxide; Sm2O3, samarium oxide; Yb2O3, ytterbium oxide; Er2O3, erbium oxide; Ce2O3 (or CeO2), cerium oxide, or combinations thereof. In the instance where one of these alternative oxides is used, the concentration of the oxide in the starting material formulation ranges from about 0.1 mole % to about 90 mole %, and typically ranges from about 10 mole % to about 30 mole %.
After mixing of at least one of the alternative oxides listed above with the Y2O3 and ZrO2 powders used to form a solid solution, the combination of powders was compacted by unidirectionally mechanical pressing or cold isostatic pressing of the granular powder formed by spray drying with a typical content of binders. The green body was then pressureless sintered using techniques known in the art. Upon cooling of the sintered body, a single phase or two phase solid solution forms, where the solid solution is a “multi-element-doped” solid solution. One solid solution exhibits a cubic yttria crystal structure, and another solid solution exhibits the cubic fluorite-type crystal structure. The solid solution has excellent plasma resistance, typically better erosion resistance than that of the aluminum oxide-comprising solid solutions discussed herein. However, the mechanical properties of the yttria-zirconia-alumina system are somewhat better. All of these multi-doped solid solutions exhibit excellent plasma erosion resistance and improved mechanical properties in comparison with previously known yttrium oxide-zirconium oxide solid solutions.
As a preface to the detailed description, it should be noted that, as used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents, unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
When the word “about” is used herein, this is intended to mean that the nominal value presented is precise within ±10%.
Bulk yttrium oxide has been shown to have very good corrosion resistance upon exposure to fluorine plasma and other corrosive plasmas which are typically used in semiconductor manufacturing processes (such as etch processes and chemical vapor deposition processes). However, pure crystalline yttrium oxide, while offering very good corrosion resistance to various etchant plasmas, does not offer good mechanical properties in terms of flexural strength and fracture toughness, for example. To improve the overall performance and handling capabilities of semiconductor component parts and liners, there is a need to improve the mechanical properties from those available in pure crystalline yttrium oxide. To obtain the improvement in mechanical properties, it is necessary to form an alloy of yttrium oxide with a compatible oxide. The improvement in mechanical properties is needed to be accomplished without harming the very good plasma erosion properties of the pure yttrium oxide.
In consideration of the Gibbs Formation Free Energy of various ceramic materials which might be compatible with yttrium oxide, we determined that it is more difficult to form fluorides than oxides for yttrium and aluminum elements, so that yttrium oxide and aluminum oxide are expected to provide good resistance to a fluorine-containing plasma. The Gibbs Formation Free Energy of zirconium fluoride is similar to that for yttrium fluoride. Further, in a homogeneous amorphous oxyfluoride, or a glass-ceramic composite oxyfluoride, increasing the zirconium fluoride content can decrease the free energy of the final oxyfluoride to make it more stable.
Tables One-Three, below, provides the etch plasma compositions and etch plasma processing conditions which were used for evaluation of a series of test coupon materials. There were three basic different sets of etch plasma conditions which were used for the erosion rate testing: 1) Trench etching, where the etch plasma source gas and etch process conditions were representative of etching a trench feature size beyond 65 nm technology, i.e. smaller than 65 nm, into a multilayered semiconductor substrate. Such a substrate typically includes an antireflective coating (ARC or BARC) layer, an organic or inorganic dielectric layer, a metal layer, and an etch stop layer. Contact Via etching, where the etch plasma source gas and etch process conditions were representative of etching a contact via having an aspect ratio of about 30 in production and 40 plus in the developed device substrate, and having a diameter of beyond 65 nm technology into a multilayered semiconductor substrate including a buried ARC (BARC) layer, a dielectric layer and a stop layer; and 3) Metal etching, here the etch plasma source gas and etch process conditions were representative of etching an overlying titanium nitride hard mask and an aluminum layer, where the etch plasma source gas and etch process conditions are beyond 65 nm technology.
The trench etching process and the contact via etching process were carried out in the ENABLER™ processing system, and the metal etching process was carried out in the DPS™ processing system, all available from Applied Materials, Inc. of Santa Clara, Calif.
1Plasma Source Power in W.
2Pressure in mTorr.
3Substrate Bias Power in W.
4Substrate Temperature in ° C.
5Time in seconds.
1Plasma Source Power in W.
2Pressure in mTorr.
3Substrate Bias Power in W.
4Substrate Temperature in ° C.
5Time in seconds.
1Plasma Source Power in W.
2Substrate Bias Power in W.
3Pressure in mTorr.
4Substrate Temperature in ° C.
5Time in seconds.
Aluminum oxide has frequently been used as a protective layer or liner when a semiconductor process makes use of an etchant plasma. Using aluminum oxide as the base comparative material, we determined the relative etch rates, in a Trench Etch (CF4/CHF3) environment. With aluminum oxide having a relative erosion rate of 1, we found that the relative erosion rate of quartz was about 2.2 times that of aluminum oxide. The relative erosion rate of silicon carbide was about 1.6 times that of aluminum oxide. The relative erosion rate of zirconia was about 0.8 times that of aluminum oxide. The relative erosion rate of pure yttrium oxide was about 0.19 times that of aluminum oxide. The relative erosion rate of a yttrium oxide, zirconium oxide, aluminum oxide ceramic composite, formed from 55 mole % yttrium oxide, 20 mole % zirconium oxide, and 25 mole % aluminum oxide was about 0.2 times that of aluminum oxide. The relative erosion rate of a yttrium oxide, zirconium oxide, aluminum oxide ceramic composite, formed from 63 mole % yttrium oxide, 23 mole % zirconium oxide, and 14 mole % aluminum oxide was about 0.05 times that of aluminum oxide.
With reference to the trench etching method described above, the sample substrate test coupon erosion rates measured were as follows. The erosion rate of aluminum oxide was 1.1 μm/hr. The erosion rate of bulk yttrium oxide was 0.3 μm/hr. The erosion rate of a the a yttrium oxide, zirconium oxide, aluminum oxide ceramic composite, formed from 55 mole % yttrium oxide, 20 mole % zirconium oxide, and 25 mole % aluminum oxide was 0.1 μm/hr. The erosion rate of a yttrium oxide, zirconium oxide, aluminum oxide ceramic composite, formed from 63 mole % yttrium oxide, 23 mole % zirconium oxide, and 14 mole % aluminum oxide was 0.07 μm/hr.
With reference to the via etching method described above, the sample substrate test coupon erosion rates measured were as follows. The erosion rate of aluminum oxide was not measured. The erosion rate of bulk yttrium oxide was 0.16 μm/hr. The erosion rate of a the a yttrium oxide, zirconium oxide, aluminum oxide solid solution, formed from 55 mole % yttrium oxide, 20 mole % zirconium oxide, and 25 mole % aluminum oxide was 0.21 μm/hr. The erosion rate of a yttrium oxide, zirconium oxide, aluminum oxide solid solution, formed from 63 mole % yttrium oxide, 23 mole % zirconium oxide, and 14 mole % aluminum oxide was 0.22 μm/hr.
With reference to the metal etching method described above, the sample substrate test coupon erosion rates measured were as follows. The erosion rate of aluminum oxide was 4.10 μm/hr. The erosion rate for bulk yttrium oxide was 0.14 μm/hr. The erosion rate of a the a yttrium oxide, zirconium oxide, aluminum oxide ceramic composite, formed from 55 mole % yttrium oxide, 20 mole % zirconium oxide, and 25 mole % aluminum oxide was 0.10 μm/hr. The erosion rate of a yttrium oxide, zirconium oxide, aluminum oxide ceramic composite, formed from 63 mole % yttrium oxide, 23 mole % zirconium oxide, and 14 mole % aluminum oxide was 0.18 μm/hr.
The yttrium-oxide-containing ceramic composites include: 1) yttrium oxide-zirconium oxide solid solution; and 2) yttrium aluminate, when the composition was yttrium oxide 100 parts by weight, zirconium oxide 20 parts by weight, and aluminum oxide 10 parts by weight (This composition is the same as 63 mole % yttrium oxide, 23 mole % zirconium oxide, and 14 mole % aluminum oxide); or when the composition was yttrium oxide 100 parts by weight, zirconium oxide 20 parts by weight, and aluminum oxide 20 parts by weight (This composition is the same as 55 mole % yttrium oxide, 20 mole % zirconium oxide, and 25 mole % aluminum oxide). All of the photomicrographs are at a magnification of 1,000 times.
The surface roughness of the bulk yttrium oxide shown in
Looking at the erosion rates for the three test coupons, it appears that the 1,000 times magnification for the post-etch coupons shows better surface characteristics related to the erosion rates of the coupons. The erosion rates were 0.16 μm/hr for the solid yttrium oxide shown in
Table Four below shows comparative physical and mechanical properties for the bulk, pure yttrium oxide ceramic and for various yttrium-oxide containing solid solution ceramics.
A review of the plasma erosion rate clearly shows the advantages of the solid solution yttrium oxide, zirconium oxide, aluminum oxide ceramics which have been described herein. We have demonstrated that it is possible to reduce the erosion rate of a ceramic material of this kind, while maintaining acceptable mechanical properties, which enable easier handling of the apparatus without risk of damage to the apparatus.
Combinations of yttrium oxide, zirconium oxide and aluminum oxide have been evaluated, and we have discovered that ceramic materials formed from starting compositions in which the Y2O3, yttrium oxide, molar concentration ranges from about 50 mole % to about 75 mole %; the ZrO2, zirconium oxide, molar concentration ranges from about 10 mole % to about 30 mole %; and, the Al2O3, aluminum oxide, molar concentration ranges from about 10 mole % to about 30 mole %, provide excellent erosion resistance to halogen containing plasmas while providing advanced mechanical properties which enable handling of solid ceramic processing components with less concern about damage to a component. In many applications, a starting composition for the ceramic materials may be one in which Y2O3 molar concentration ranges from about 55 mole % to about 65 mole %, the ZrO2 molar concentration ranges from about 10 mole % to about 25 mole % and the Al2O3 molar concentration ranges from about 10 mole % to about 20 mole %. When the erosion rate is of great concern, starting material concentration of the ceramic material may be one in which Y2O3 molar concentration ranges from about 55 mole % to about 65 mole %, the ZrO2 molar concentration ranges from about 20 mole % to about 25 mole % and the Al2O3 molar concentration 5 mole % to about 10 mole %.
Starting material compositions of the kind described above may be used to form a ceramic coating over the surface of a variety of metal or ceramic substrates, including but not limited to aluminum, aluminum alloy, stainless steel, alumina, aluminum nitride, and quartz, using a technique well known in the art, such as plasma spray, for example and not by way of limitation. However, with the improved mechanical properties which have been obtained, it is recommended that solid ceramic apparatus components be used when possible, to prevent sudden failure of plasma resistance due to coating layer flaking off, or defects in the coating which appear as the coating thins, or the formation of metal contamination by mobile impurities from the underlying substrate which migrate into the coating.
The addition of a concentration of zirconium oxide, ranging from about 0.1 mole % to about 65 mole % to what was a pure yttrium oxide, provides a solid solution of yttrium oxide and zirconium oxide with the cubic yttria crystal structure or cubic fluorite-type crystal structure, where the cell parameter is smaller than that of the pure structure, due to the formation of yttrium vacancy/oxygen vacancy, respectively. The smaller cell parameter of the solid solution crystal structure improves the plasma resistance properties of the solid solution of zirconium oxide in yttrium oxide. For example, the erosion rate of a solid yttrium oxide ceramic in a CF4/CHF3 plasma of the kind used to etch a trench in a multilayered semiconductor substrate is about 0.3 μm/hr. The erosion rate of a solid solution ceramic of about 69 mole % yttrium oxide and about 31 mole % zirconium oxide is about 0.1 μm/hr, a 3 times slower etch rate than solid yttrium oxide. This unexpected decrease in etch rate extends the lifetime of a process chamber liner or an internal apparatus component within the process chamber, so that: the replacement frequency for such apparatus is reduced, reducing apparatus down time; the particle amount generated during a process is reduced, improving the product properties; the metal contamination generated during a process is reduced, advancing the product properties; and the overall will reduce the overall cost of the processing apparatus per wafer processed will be reduced, on the average.
While the 0.1 μm/hr erosion rate for the zirconium oxide-containing yttrium oxide solid solution is surprisingly better than that of yttrium oxide at 0.3 μm/hr, and considerably better than of a solid aluminum oxide ceramic at 1.44 μm/hr in the CF4/CHF3 plasma, the mechanical properties of the zirconium oxide-containing yttrium oxide solid solution illustrate that an improvement in flexural strength and fracture toughness would be helpful.
In one embodiment, the flexural strength and fracture toughness of the zirconium oxide-containing yttrium oxide solid solution are achieved, by adding various amounts of aluminum oxide to the formula for the solid solution ceramic to form an additional yttrium aluminate phase. The mixture of oxides was compacted by unidirectional mechanical pressing or cold isostatic pressing of a granular powder formed by spray drying, in combination with a typical content of binders. The green body was then pressureless sintered using techniques generally known in the art. The addition of 10 mole % to 30 mole % of alumina significantly improved the mechanical properties of the sintered ceramic composition in terms of flexural strength and fracture toughness. For example, the erosion rate of the ceramic containing 69 mole % yttrium oxide and 31 mole % zirconium oxide, after exposure to a plasma containing CF4 and CHF3, was about 0.1 μm/hr. For the ceramic containing about 14 mole % aluminum oxide, the erosion rate after exposure to the same plasma was also about 0.1 μm/hr. For the ceramic containing about 25 mole % aluminum oxide, the erosion rate after exposure to the same plasma was about 0.2 μm/hr. With respect to the mechanical properties, for example, an overall starting composition which is about 69 mole % yttrium oxide and about 31 mole % zirconium oxide, after sintering exhibits a flexural strength of about 137 MPa, and a fracture toughness of 1.3 MPa·m1/2, as discussed above. When the overall ceramic composition is about 63 mole % yttrium oxide, about 23 mole % zirconium oxide, and about 14 mole % aluminum oxide, after sintering the flexural strength is about 215 MPa and the fracture toughness is about 1.6 Mpa·m1/2. When the overall ceramic composition is about 55 mole % yttrium oxide, about 20 mole % zirconium oxide, and about 25 mole % aluminum oxide, after sintering the flexural strength is about 172 MPa and the fracture toughness is about 1.7 MPa·m1/2. The relationship between aluminum oxide content, increase in flexural strength, and increase in erosion rate is not a linear relationship. However, one of skill in the art can optimize the formula with minimal experimentation, in view of the information provided herein.
As an alternative to adding aluminum oxide to a multi-phase metal stable composition containing yttrium oxide and zirconium oxide is to add HfO2, hafnium oxide; Sc2O3, scandium oxide; Nd2O3, neodymium oxide; Nb2O5, niobium oxide; Sm2O3, samarium oxide; Yb2O3, ytterbium oxide; Er2O3, erbium oxide; Ce2O3 (or CeO2), cerium oxide, or combinations thereof. In the instance where these alternative compounds are used, the concentration of the alternative compound in the starting material formulation ranges from about 0.1 mole % to about 90 mole %. Typically the concentration used will range from about 10 mole % to about 30 mole %.
After mixing of at least one of the alternative oxides listed above with the Y2O3 and ZrO2 powders used to form a solid solution, the combination of powders was compacted by unidirectionally mechanical pressing or cold isostatic pressing of the granular powder formed by spray drying with a typical content of binders. The green body was then pressureless sintered using techniques known in the art. Upon cooling of the sintered body, a single phase or two phase solid solution forms, where the solid solution is a “multi-element-doped” solid solution. One solid solution exhibits a cubic yttria crystal structure, and another solid solution exhibits the cubic fluorite-type crystal structure. The solid solution has excellent plasma resistance, typically better erosion resistance than that of the aluminum oxide-comprising solid solutions discussed herein. However, the mechanical properties of the yttria-zirconia-alumina system are somewhat better. All of these multi-doped solid solutions exhibit excellent plasma erosion resistance and improved mechanical properties in comparison with previously known yttrium oxide-zirconium oxide solid solutions.
Typical applications for a yttrium oxide-comprising substrate of the kind described herein include, but are not limited to components used internal to a plasma processing chamber, such as a lid, lid-liner, nozzle, gas distribution plate or shower head, electrostatic chuck components, shadow frame, substrate holding frame, processing kit, and chamber liner. All of these components are well known in the art to those who do plasma processing.
The above described exemplary embodiments are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention, as one skilled in the art can, in view of the present disclosure, expand such embodiments to correspond with the subject matter of the invention claimed below.
The present application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/998,723, filed Nov. 26, 2013, which is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/986,040, filed Mar. 25, 2013, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/199,521, filed Aug. 31, 2011, which is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/660,068, filed Feb. 19, 2010, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/796,210, filed Apr. 27, 2007, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties. The present application is also related to a series of applications filed by various inventors of the present application, many of which relate to the use of a yttrium-oxide comprising ceramic in the form of a coating, to provide a plasma-resistant surface which is useful in semiconductor processing applications. The applications include U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/075,967 of Sun et al., filed Feb. 14, 2002, entitled: “Yttrium Oxide Based Surface Coating for Semiconductor IC Processing Vacuum Chambers;” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/898,113 of Sun et al., filed Jul. 22, 2004, entitled: “Clean, Dense Yttrium Oxide Coating Protecting Semiconductor Processing Apparatus;” and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/918,232, of Sun et al., filed Aug. 13, 2004, entitled: “Gas Distribution Plate Fabricated from a Solid Yttrium Oxide-Comprising Substrate.” Additional related applications filed, which are a divisional and a continuation application of above-listed applications, include: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/595,484 of Wang et al., filed Nov. 10, 2006, entitled: “Cleaning Method Used in Removing Contaminants from the Surface of an Oxide or Fluoride Comprising a Group III Metal,” which is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/898,113; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/592,905 of Wang et al., filed Nov. 3, 2006, entitled: “Cleaning Method Used in Removing Contaminants from a Solid Yttrium Oxide-Containing Substrate,” which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/918,232. The subject matter of all of these patents and applications is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3868351 | Hand et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
| 4098612 | Rhodes et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
| 4166880 | Loferski et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
| 4328294 | Tanaka et al. | May 1982 | A |
| 4328295 | Tanaka et al. | May 1982 | A |
| 4360598 | Otagiri et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4370393 | Watanabe et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
| 4576874 | Spengler et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4629537 | Hsu | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4645716 | Harrington et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4656455 | Tanino et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
| 5011761 | Cagnin et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5069938 | Lorimer et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5102496 | Savas | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5162133 | Bartha et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5366585 | Robertson et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5407121 | Koopman et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5413877 | Griffith | May 1995 | A |
| 5488825 | Davis et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5488925 | Kumada | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5589002 | Su | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5605637 | Shan et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5651797 | Laube | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5680013 | Dornfest et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5746875 | Maydan et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5762748 | Banholzer et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5798016 | Oehrlein et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5827791 | Pauliny et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5879523 | Wang et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5888884 | Wojnarowski | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5900283 | Vakil et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5902763 | Waku et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5904800 | Mautz | May 1999 | A |
| 5942039 | Kholodenko et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5986338 | Nakajima | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5993594 | Wicker et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5993976 | Sahoo et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6027629 | Hisamoto et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6027792 | Yamamoto et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6069103 | Kwon | May 2000 | A |
| 6100633 | Okumura et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6123791 | Han et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6143432 | de Rochemont et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6153270 | Russmann et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6170429 | Schoepp et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6183897 | Hartvigsen et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6237528 | Szapucki et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6352611 | Han et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6383964 | Nakahara et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6399499 | Lee | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6408786 | Kennedy et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6447937 | Murakawa et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6492042 | Morita et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6521046 | Tanaka et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6547978 | Ye et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6548424 | Putkonen | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6565984 | Wu et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6592707 | Shih et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6620520 | O'Donnell et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6641697 | Han et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6641941 | Yamada et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6645585 | Ozono | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6682627 | Shamouilian et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6730422 | Litton et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6773751 | O'Donnell et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6776873 | Sun et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6777353 | Putkonen | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6777873 | Hashikawa | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6780787 | O'Donnell et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6783863 | Harada et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6783875 | Yamada et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6805952 | Chang et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6830622 | O'Donnell et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6858332 | Yamada | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6858546 | Niinisto et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6884516 | Harada et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6916559 | Murakawa et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6933254 | Morita et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6942929 | Han et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6983892 | Noorbakhsh et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7101819 | Rosenflanz et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7137353 | Saigusa et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7147544 | Rosenflanz | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7147749 | Nishimoto et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7148167 | Shikata et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7163585 | Nishimoto et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7166166 | Saigusa et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7166200 | Saigusa et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7168267 | Rosenflanz et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7186466 | Zhu et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7220497 | Chang | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7226673 | Yamada et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7255898 | O'Donnell et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7291408 | Litton et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7351658 | Putkonen | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7429350 | Saint-Ramond et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7479304 | Sun et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7494723 | Harada et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7498272 | Niinisto et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7501000 | Rosenflanz et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7501001 | Rosenflanz et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7510585 | Rosenflanz | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7608553 | Fujita et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7696117 | Sun et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7862901 | Darolia et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 8016948 | Wang et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8021762 | Taylor et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8034734 | Sun et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8067067 | Sun et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8367227 | Sun et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8623527 | Sun et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8728967 | Taylor et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8871312 | Sun | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 9051219 | Sun et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9440886 | Sun | Sep 2016 | B2 |
| 9616559 | Slack | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9884787 | Sun | Feb 2018 | B2 |
| 20010003271 | Otsuki | Jun 2001 | A1 |
| 20020009560 | Ozono | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020015853 | Wataya et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020018921 | Yamada et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020086118 | Chang et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020110698 | Singh | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020127853 | Hubacek et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020142611 | O'Donnell et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020177001 | Harada et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020190652 | Do et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030010446 | Kajiyama et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030027049 | Barker et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030029563 | Kaushal et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030034130 | Fujita et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030051811 | Uchimaru et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030075109 | Arai | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030110708 | Rosenflanz | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030127049 | Han et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030134134 | Simpson et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030152813 | Paz de Araujo et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030203120 | Tsukatani et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030215643 | Morita et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030215665 | Bruce et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030215996 | Putkonen | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040002221 | O'Donnell et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040023047 | O'Donnell et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040038085 | Litton et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040038086 | Litton et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040060657 | Saigusa et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040067392 | Yamada et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040149210 | Fink | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040159984 | Isomura et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040191545 | Han et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040216667 | Mitsuhashi et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040229078 | Maeda | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040245089 | Lawson | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040245098 | Eckerson | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050003240 | O'Donnell | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050037193 | Sun et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050056218 | Sun et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050065012 | Rosenflanz et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050123288 | Ito et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050161061 | Shih et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050215059 | Davis et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050227118 | Uchimaru et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050274320 | Murugesh et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050279457 | Matsudo et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060037536 | Kobayashi et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060040508 | Ji et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060042754 | Yoshida et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060043067 | Kadkhodayan et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060073354 | Watanabe et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20070032072 | Sidhwa | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070109713 | Miyaji et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070134416 | Wang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070151581 | Wang et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070197368 | Ysukuma et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070237971 | Saint-Ramond et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070274837 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080026160 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080029032 | Sun et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080160172 | Taylor et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080213496 | Sun et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080213617 | Taylor et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080220209 | Taylor et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080237543 | Kobayashi et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080264564 | Sun et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080264565 | Sun et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090025751 | Wang et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090036292 | Sun et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090087615 | Sun et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090108507 | Messing et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090214825 | Sun et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20100160143 | Sun et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100272982 | Dickinson et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20110036874 | Wang et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110110293 | Hart et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20120003102 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120034469 | Sun et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120035046 | Rosenflanz | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120122651 | Taylor et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20130224498 | Sun et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130295326 | Doesburg et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130330507 | Taylor et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140178632 | Taylor et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140334939 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20150056218 | Jeffries et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150143677 | Sun et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20160326060 | Sun | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20180044246 | Sun | Feb 2018 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1412150 | Apr 2003 | CN |
| 1699279 | Nov 2005 | CN |
| 19955134 | May 2001 | DE |
| 0293198 | Nov 1988 | EP |
| 1088803 | Apr 2001 | EP |
| 1158072 | Nov 2001 | EP |
| 1310466 | May 2003 | EP |
| S61031352 | Feb 1986 | JP |
| H03287797 | Dec 1991 | JP |
| 06065706 | Mar 1994 | JP |
| H11251304 | Sep 1999 | JP |
| 2000001362 | Jan 2000 | JP |
| 2000012666 | Jan 2000 | JP |
| 2001023908 | Jan 2001 | JP |
| 2001049419 | Feb 2001 | JP |
| 2001089229 | Apr 2001 | JP |
| 2001179080 | Jul 2001 | JP |
| 2001181042 | Jul 2001 | JP |
| 2001203256 | Jul 2001 | JP |
| 2001244246 | Sep 2001 | JP |
| 2001308011 | Nov 2001 | JP |
| 2001322871 | Nov 2001 | JP |
| 2002080270 | Mar 2002 | JP |
| 2002087878 | Mar 2002 | JP |
| 2002249864 | Sep 2002 | JP |
| 2002255647 | Sep 2002 | JP |
| 2003146751 | May 2003 | JP |
| 2003238250 | Aug 2003 | JP |
| 2003282688 | Oct 2003 | JP |
| 2004269951 | Sep 2004 | JP |
| 2004292270 | Oct 2004 | JP |
| 2005206421 | Aug 2005 | JP |
| 2005335991 | Dec 2005 | JP |
| 2006089338 | Apr 2006 | JP |
| 2006097114 | Apr 2006 | JP |
| 2007145702 | Jun 2007 | JP |
| 1020040048343 | Jun 2004 | KR |
| 20070021061 | Feb 2007 | KR |
| 381643 | May 1973 | SU |
| 722715 | Mar 1980 | SU |
| 2004003968 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| 2007008999 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| 2009017766 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Suzuki, “Phase transition temperature of fluorite-type ZrO2—Y2O,” Solid State Ionics, pp. 211-216, 1995, 6 pages. |
| Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2018-217295 dated Jun. 25, 2019, 8 pages. |
| “Plasma Spray” SemiCon Precision Industries Inc. 2005, Jun. 16, 2007, http://www.semiconprecision.com/plasma.htm. |
| “Surface Preparation” SemiCon Precision Industries Inc. 2005, Jun. 16, 2007, http://www.semiconprecision.com/surface_prep.htm. |
| European Search Report of corresponding EP Application Patent Application No. 08154940.4 Oct. 2010. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion of International Patent Application No. PCT/US08/09221 dated Nov. 18, 2008. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20190157113 A1 | May 2019 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13986040 | Mar 2013 | US |
| Child | 13998723 | US | |
| Parent | 12660068 | Feb 2010 | US |
| Child | 13199521 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13998723 | Nov 2013 | US |
| Child | 16252348 | US | |
| Parent | 13199521 | Aug 2011 | US |
| Child | 13986040 | US | |
| Parent | 11796210 | Apr 2007 | US |
| Child | 12660068 | US |
