COATED CUTTING TOOL

Abstract
A coated cutting tool includes a substrate and a coating layer formed onto the surface of the substrate. The coating layer contains an α-type aluminum oxide layer. A residual stress value at the (116) plane of the α-type aluminum oxide layer is greater than 0. A residual stress value at the (012) plane of the α-type aluminum oxide layer is smaller than 0.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a coated cutting tool.


BACKGROUND ART

It has heretofore been known a coated cutting tool having a substrate comprising a cemented carbide and a coating layer formed on the surface of the substrate. The coating layer comprises, for example, at least one kind of compound selected from the group consisting of a carbide, a nitride, a carbonitride, a carboxide and a carboxynitride of Ti. The coating layer may contain aluminum oxide. The coating layer may be a single layer or may contain two or more layers. The coating layer is formed on the surface of the substrate by the chemical vapor deposition method. A whole thickness of the coating layer is 3 to 20 μm. The coated cutting tool having such a coating layer is used for cutting processing of a steel, cast iron, etc.


In general, a tensile stress remains in the film formed on the surface of the tungsten carbide-based cemented carbide. When the tensile stress is remained in the film, fracture strength of the coated cutting tool is lowered and the coated cutting tool is easily fractured.


As a technique to release the tensile stress remained in the film, it has been known a technique in which cracks are generated at the film by shot peening (for example, see Patent Document 1).


It has been known a coated cutting tool comprising a substrate and a film formed onto the substrate, wherein the film contains a TiCN film having a tensile stress and an α type Al2O3 film having a compression stress, and the TiCN film is located between the substrate and the α type Al2O3 film (for example, see Patent Document 2).


PRIOR ART DOCUMENT
Patent Documents

Patent Document 1: JP Hei.5-116003A


Patent Document 2: WO 2006/064724A


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Problems to be Solved by the Invention

Cutting processing in recent years is remarkable in high-speed, high feeding and deep cutting, so that the tool life tends to be shortened than the conventional ones.


In the tool disclosed in the above-mentioned Patent Document 1, when a tensile stress remained in the film is released, fracture resistance of the tool is improved but there is a problem that wear resistance of the tool is lowered. The reason thereof is considered that a part of the film is peeled off from the crack generated at the film as a starting point.


The tool disclosed in the above-mentioned Patent Document 2 has a compression stress at the whole part of the α type Al2O3 film. Thus, the tool disclosed in the above-mentioned Patent Document 2 involves the problem that wear resistance is low.


The present invention has been done to solve these problems, and an object thereof is to improve wear resistance and fracture resistance of a coated cutting tool by controlling stress distribution of the coated cutting tool. In addition, an object of the present invention is to elongate the life of the tool.


Means to Solve the Problems

The present inventors have studied on the coated cutting tool from the above-mentioned viewpoints, and accomplished the following inventions. According to the present invention, wear resistance and fracture resistance of the tool can be improved. In addition, according to the present invention, a tool life can be elongated.


The summary of the present invention is as follows.


(1) A coated cutting tool which comprises a substrate and a coating layer formed on a surface of the substrate, wherein


the coating layer contains an α type aluminum oxide layer,


a residual stress value of the α type aluminum oxide layer at a (116) plane is larger than 0, and


a residual stress value of the α type aluminum oxide layer at a (012) plane is smaller than 0.


(2) The coated cutting tool of (1), wherein


the residual stress value of the α type aluminum oxide layer at the (116) plane is made A, then, A is 20≦A≦500 MPa, and


the residual stress value of the α type aluminum oxide layer at the (012) plane is made B, then, B is −800≦B≦−100 MPa.


(3) The coated cutting tool of (1) or (2), wherein the residual stress value is a value measured by a sin2ψ method.


(4) The coated cutting tool of any one of (1) to (3), wherein an average thickness of the α type aluminum oxide layer is 1 to 15 μm.


(5) The coated cutting tool of any one of (1) to (4), wherein


the tool further comprises a Ti compound layer containing a compound of a Ti element and at least one element selected from the group consisting of C, N, O and B, and


the Ti compound layer is formed between the substrate and the α type aluminum oxide layer.


(6) The coated cutting tool of any one of (1) to (5), wherein


the Ti compound layer contains a TiCN layer, and


an atomic ratio of C based on a total of C and N [C/(C+N)] contained in the TiCN layer is 0.7≦C/(C+N)≦0.9.


(7) The coated cutting tool of any one of (1) to (6), wherein


an average thickness of the coating layer is 3 to 30 μm, and


an average thickness of the Ti compound layer is 2 to 15 μm.


(8) The coated cutting tool of any one of (1) to (7), wherein the substrate is a cemented carbide, cermet, ceramics or a cubic boron nitride sintered body.


<Coated Cutting Tool>


The coated cutting tool of the present invention comprises a substrate and a coating layer formed on the surface of the substrate. The coated cutting tool is, for example, an insert for milling, an insert for turning processing, a drill or an end mill, etc.


<Substrate>


The substrate of the present invention is, for example, a cemented carbide, a cermet, ceramics, a cubic boron nitride sintered body, a diamond sintered body or a high speed steel. Among these materials, a cemented carbide, a cermet, ceramics or a cubic boron nitride sintered body is preferred since wear resistance and fracture resistance are excellent.


Incidentally, the surface of the substrate may be modified. When the substrate is a cemented carbide, for example, a β-free layer may be formed on the surface of the substrate. When the substrate is a cermet, a hardened layer may be formed on the surface of the substrate.


<Coating Layer>


An average thickness of the coating layer of the present invention is preferably 3 to 30 μm. If the thickness of the coating layer is less than 3 μm, wear resistance of the coating layer is lowered in some cases. If the thickness of the coating layer exceeds 30 μm, adhesiveness between the coating layer and the substrate, and fracture resistance of the coating layer are lowered in some cases. The average thickness of the coating layer is further preferably 3 to 20 μm.


<α Type Aluminum Oxide Layer>


The coating layer of the present invention contains an aluminum oxide layer. The aluminum oxide layer may be one layer or a plural number of layers. A crystal form of the aluminum oxide layer is an α type.


The residual stress value at the (116) plane of the α type aluminum oxide layer of the present invention is larger than 0 (MPa). That is, the residual stress at the (116) plane of the α type aluminum oxide layer of the present invention is a tensile stress.


The residual stress value at the (012) plane of the α type aluminum oxide layer of the present invention is smaller than 0 (MPa). That is, the residual stress at the (012) plane of the α type aluminum oxide layer of the present invention is a compression stress.


When the residual stress at the (116) plane of the α type aluminum oxide layer is a tensile stress and the residual stress at the (012) plane of the α type aluminum oxide layer is also a tensile stress, cracks are likely generated at the coating layer at the time of cutting processing, and fracture resistance of the coated cutting tool is lowered.


When the residual stress at the (012) plane of the α type aluminum oxide layer is a compression stress and the residual stress at the (116) plane of the α type aluminum oxide layer is also a compression stress, an energy necessary for a mechanical processing such as dry shot-blasting, etc., to the coating layer becomes high. When the energy of the mechanical processing is high, cracks are likely generated at the coating layer. When the cracks are generated at the coating layer, a part of the coating layer is easily peeled off by the impact at the time of cutting processing. Therefore, inherent properties of the coating layer cannot sufficiently be exhibited, and wear resistance of the coated cutting tool is lowered.


The compression stress herein mentioned means a kind of an internal stress (inherent strain) of the coating layer, and is a stress exhibited by the numerical value of “−” (minus). The compression stress is large means that the absolute value of the compression stress is large. The compression stress is small means that an absolute value of the compression stress is small.


The tensile stress herein mentioned means a kind of an internal stress (inherent strain) of the coating layer, and is a stress exhibited by the numerical value of “+” (plus). In the present specification, when it is simply mentioned as a residual stress, it includes both of the compression stress and the tensile stress.


When the residual stress value at the (116) plane of the α type aluminum oxide layer of the present invention is made A, then, A is preferably 20≦A≦500 MPa. If the residual stress value A at the (116) plane of the α type aluminum oxide layer is less than 20 MPa, wear resistance of the coating layer tends to be lowered. If the residual stress value A at the (116) plane of the α type aluminum oxide layer exceeds 500 MPa, fracture resistance of the coating layer tends to be lowered.


When the residual stress value at the (012) plane of the α type aluminum oxide layer of the present invention is made B, then, B is preferably −800≦B≦−100 MPa. If the residual stress value B at the (012) plane of the α type aluminum oxide layer is less than −800 MPa, cracks or peeling is/are likely generated at the coating layer, and wear resistance of the coating layer is lowered. If the residual stress value B at the (012) plane of the α type aluminum oxide layer exceeds −100 MPa, an effect obtained by providing the compression stress to the coating layer becomes small, so that fracture resistance of the coating layer is lowered.


The residual stress values (A and B) can be measured by the sin2ψ method using an X-ray stress measurement apparatus. Residual stress values at optional 10 points in the coating layer are measured by the sin2ψ method, and it is preferred to obtain an average value of the residual stress values at these 10 points. The optional 10 points in the coating layer which are portions to be measured are preferably so selected that these points are separated 0.1 mm or more from each other.


For measuring the residual stress value at the (012) plane of the α type aluminum oxide layer, the (012) plane of the α type aluminum oxide layer is selected. Specifically, a sample on which the α type aluminum oxide layer has been formed is analyzed by an X-ray diffractometer. And change in the diffraction angle of the (012) plane when the angle w formed by the normal line of the sample plane and the normal line of the lattice plane has been changed is examined.


For measuring the residual stress value at the (116) plane of the α type aluminum oxide layer, the (116) plane of the α type aluminum oxide layer is selected. Specifically, a sample on which the α type aluminum oxide layer has been formed is analyzed by an X-ray diffractometer. And change in the diffraction angle of the (116) plane when the angle ψ formed by the normal line of the sample plane and the normal line of the lattice plane has been changed is examined.


An incident angle of the X ray is different depending on the face of the crystal of the α type aluminum oxide layer.


A residual stress value B measured by selecting the (012) plane of the α type aluminum oxide layer is considered to show the residual stress relatively at the surface side of the α type aluminum oxide layer.


A residual stress value A measured by selecting the (116) plane of the α type aluminum oxide layer is considered to show the residual stress relatively at the inside of the α type aluminum oxide layer.


An average thickness of the α type aluminum oxide layer of the present invention is preferably 1 to 15 μm. If the average thickness of the α type aluminum oxide layer is less than 1 μm, crater wear resistance of the rake face is lowered in some cases. If the average thickness of the α type aluminum oxide layer exceeds 15 μm, peeling is likely generated at the coating layer, and fracture resistance of the coating layer is lowered in some cases.


<Ti Compound Layer>


The coating layer of the present invention preferably contains a Ti compound layer. If the coating layer contains the Ti compound layer, wear resistance of the coating layer is improved. The Ti compound layer may be one layer or a plural number of layers.


The Ti compound layer of the present invention may be formed between the substrate and the α type aluminum oxide layer, or may be formed at the outside of the α type aluminum oxide layer.


The Ti compound layer of the present invention is preferably formed onto the surface of the substrate. When the Ti compound layer is formed onto the surface of the substrate, adhesiveness between the substrate and the coating layer is improved.


The Ti compound layer of the present invention may be formed at the outermost side of the coating layer. When the Ti compound layer is formed at the outermost side of the coating layer, the used corner of the coated cutting tool can be easily identified.


The Ti compound layer contains a Ti compound. The Ti compound contains Ti as an essential element, and contains at least one element selected from the group consisting of C, N, O and B. The Ti compound layer may further contain at least one element selected from the group consisting of Zr, Hf, V, Nb, Ta, Cr, Mo, W, Al and Si. The Ti compound layer contains, for example, at least one selected from the group consisting of a TiN layer, a TiCN layer, a TiC layer, a TiAlCNO layer, a TiAlCO layer, a TiCNO layer and a TiCO layer.


An average thickness of the Ti compound layer of the present invention is preferably 2 to 15 μm. If the average thickness of the Ti compound layer is less than 2 μm, wear resistance of the coating layer tends to be lowered. If the average thickness of the Ti compound layer exceeds 15 μm, fracture resistance of the coating layer tends to be lowered.


The Ti compound layer of the present invention preferably contains a TiCN layer. When the Ti compound layer contains a TiCN layer, wear resistance of the Ti compound layer is improved. An atomic ratio of C based on the total of C and N [C/(C+N)] contained in the TiCN layer is preferably 0.7≦C/(C+N)≦0.9. If the C/(C+N) is less than 0.7, hardness of the coating layer is lowered whereby wear resistance of the coating layer is lowered in some cases. If the C/(C+N) exceeds 0.9, toughness of the coating layer is lowered whereby chipping resistance of the coating layer is lowered in some cases.


The atomic ratio of C based on the total of C and N [C/(C+N)] contained in the TiCN layer of the present invention can be measured, for example, by EPMA. Specifically, the amounts of C and N in the TiCN layer are quantified, respectively, by EPMA, whereby the C/(C+N) can be calculated.


[Forming Method of Coating Layer]


The respective layers constituting the coating layer of the coated cutting tool of the present invention can be formed, for example, by the following methods.


The TiN layer can be formed, for example, by the chemical vapor deposition method using the starting gas composition comprising TiCl4: 1.0 to 5.0 mol %, N2: 20 to 60 mol % and H2: the remainder, at a temperature of 850 to 920° C. and a pressure of 100 to 350 hPa.


The TiCN layer can be formed, for example, by the chemical vapor deposition method using the starting gas composition comprising TiCl4: 1.0 to 4.0 mol %, C3H6: 1.0 to 4.0 mol %, N2: 10 to 50 mol % and H2: the remainder, at a temperature of 700 to 900° C. and a pressure of 50 to 100 hPa. According to this procedure, a TiCN layer with C/(C+N)=0.7 to 0.9 can be formed.


The TiC layer can be formed by the chemical vapor deposition method using the starting gas composition comprising TiCl4: 1.0 to 3.0 mol %, CH4: 4.0 to 6.0 mol % and H2: the remainder, at a temperature of 990 to 1030° C. and a pressure of 50 to 100 hPa.


The α type aluminum oxide (Al2O3) layer can be formed by the chemical vapor deposition method using the starting gas composition comprising AlCl3: 1.0 to 5.0 mol %, CO2: 2.5 to 4.0 mol %, HCl: 2.0 to 3.0 mol %, H2S: 0.28 to 0.45 mol % and H2: the remainder, at a temperature of 900 to 1000° C. and a pressure of 60 to 80 hPa.


The TiAlCNO layer can be formed by the chemical vapor deposition method using the starting gas composition comprising TiCl4: 1.0 to 5.0 mol %, AlCl3: 1.0 to 2.0 mol %, CO: 0.4 to 1.0 mol %, N2: 30 to 40 mol % and H2: the remainder, at a temperature of 975 to 1025° C. and a pressure of 90 to 110 hPa.


The TiAlCO layer can be formed by the chemical vapor deposition method using the starting gas composition comprising TiCl4: 0.5 to 1.5 mol %, AlCl3: 1.0 to 5.0 mol %, CO: 2.0 to 4.0 mol % and H2: the remainder, at a temperature of 975 to 1025° C. and a pressure of 60 to 100 hPa.


The TiCNO layer can be formed by the chemical vapor deposition method using the starting gas composition comprising TiCl4: 1.0 to 5.0 mol %, CO: 0.4 to 1.0 mol %, N2: 30 to 40 mol % and H2: the remainder, at a temperature of 975 to 1025° C. and a pressure of 90 to 110 hPa.


The TiCO layer can be formed by the chemical vapor deposition method using the starting gas composition comprising TiCl4: 0.5 to 3.0 mol %, CO: 2.0 to 4.0 mol % and H2: the remainder, at a temperature of 975 to 1025° C. and a pressure of 60 to 100 hPa.


The coated cutting tool in which the residual stresses of the coating layer have been controlled can be obtained, for example, by the following methods.


After forming the coating layer onto the substrate, projection materials are projected to the surface of the coating layer by using dry shot-blasting or shot peening. A projection angle of the projection materials is preferably 2 to 10°. The projection materials are preferably cubic boron nitride (cBN). When the dry shot-blasting or the shot peening treatment is applied to the rake face, the flank face is preferably subjected to masking so that the projection materials do not hit the same. To the contrary, when the dry shot-blasting or the shot peening treatment is applied to the flank face, the rake face is preferably subjected to masking. An average particle diameter of the projection materials is preferably 100 to 150 μm. A projection speed of the projection materials is preferably 85 to 150 m/sec.


Thicknesses of the respective layers contained in the coating layer can be measured, for example, by using an optical microscope, a scanning electron microscope (SEM) or a field emission type scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM). Specifically, the cross-sectional structure of the coated cutting tool is observed by using an optical microscope, a scanning electron microscope (SEM) or a field emission type scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM). Incidentally, the thicknesses of the respective layers contained in the coating layer are preferably measured at the position near to 50 μm toward the rake face from the cutting edge. The thicknesses of the respective layers contained in the coating layer are preferably measured at three or more portions, and an average value of the thicknesses at the measured three portions.


Compositions of the respective layers contained in the coating layer can be measured by using an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS), a wavelength dispersive X-ray spectrometer (WDS) or an electron probe microanalyzer (EPMA). For example, the compositions of the respective layers can be measured by analyzing the cross-sectional structure of the coated cutting tool using these apparatuses.


The composition of the TiCN layer can be measured by using an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS), a wavelength dispersive X-ray spectrometer (WDS) or an electron probe microanalyzer (EPMA). For example, the composition of the TiCN layer can be measured by analyzing the cross-sectional structure of the coated cutting tool using these apparatuses.


Effects of the Invention

The coated cutting tool of the present invention has high wear resistance and excellent fracture resistance. Accordingly, the coated cutting tool of the present invention has a longer life than those of the conventional tools.







EXAMPLES

In the following, the present invention is explained by referring to Examples, but the present invention is not limited by these.


According to the procedure mentioned below, a coated cutting tool (a sample) having a substrate and a coating layer formed onto the surface of the substrate was prepared. A sectional surface of the sample was observed by SEM at the neighbor of 50 μm from the cutting edge of the prepared sample toward the center portion of the rake face of the prepared sample. A thickness of the coating layer of the coated cutting tool (the sample) was measured at the three portions, and an average value of the thickness of the measured three portions was obtained.


The residual stress of the α type aluminum oxide layer contained in the coating layer was measured by the sin2ψ method using an X-ray stress measurement apparatus. The residual stress of the α type aluminum oxide layer was measured at the optional ten points in the coating layer, and an average value of the measured residual stresses was obtained.


A cutting insert made of a cemented carbide having a JIS standard CNMA120408 shape with a composition of 93.6WC-6.0Co-0.4Cr3C2 (% by mass) was used as the substrate. After round honing was applied to the cutting blade ridge line portion of the substrate by a SiC brush, the surface of the substrate was washed.


After washing the surface of the substrate, the substrate was conveyed to an external heating type chemical vapor deposition apparatus. At the inside of an external heating type chemical vapor deposition apparatus, a coating layer was formed onto the surface of the substrate. The formation conditions of the coating layer are shown in Table 1. The constitution and the average thickness of the coating layer are shown in Table 2.












TABLE 1






Temper-
Pressure



Kind of coating layer
ature (° C.)
(hPa)
Composition of starting materials (mol %)


















α type Al2O3
1000
70
AlCl3: 2.7%, CO2: 3.3%, HCl: 2.5%, H2S: 0.3%,





H2: 91.2%


TiN
900
400
TiCl4: 3.2%, N2: 40%, H2: 56.8%


TiC
1000
75
TiCl4: 2.4%, CH4: 4.6%, H2: 93%


TiCN [C/(C + N): 0.6]
800
75
TiCl4: 3.0%, CH3CN: 0.3%, H2: 96.7%


TiCN [C/(C + N): 0.7]
800
75
TiCl4: 2.5%, C3H6: 1.0%, N2: 20%, H2: 76.5%


TiCN [C/(C + N): 0.8]
800
75
TiCl4: 2.5%, C3H6: 2.5%, N2: 20%, H2: 75%


TiCN [C/(C + N): 0.9]
800
75
TiCl4: 2.5%, C3H6: 4.0%, N2: 10%, H2: 83.5%


TiCN [C/(C + N): 0.95]
800
75
TiCl4: 2.5%, C3H6: 6.0%, N2: 5%, H2: 86.5%


TiCNO
1000
100
TiCl4: 3.5%, CO: 0.7%, N2: 35.5%, H2: 60.3%


TiAlCNO
1000
100
TiCl4: 3.8%, AlCl3: 1.5%, CO: 0.7%, N2: 35.2%,





H2: 58.8%


TiCO
1000
80
TiCl4: 1.3%, CO: 2.7%, H2: 96%


TiAlCO
1000
80
TiCl4: 1.1%, AlCl3: 3.9%, CO: 2.8%, H2: 92.2%

















TABLE 2








Coating layer












α type
Average



Ti compound layer
Al2O3
thickness













First layer
Second layer
Third layer
layer
of whole

















Average

Average

Average
Average
coating



Compo-
thickness
Compo-
thickness
Compo-
thickness
thickness
layer


Sample No.
sition
(μm)
sition
(μm)
sition
(μm)
(μm)
(μm)


















Present
TiN
0.3
TiCN
8
TiCNO
0.5
8
16.8


product1










Present
TiN
0.3
TiCN
2
TiCNO
0.5
2
4.8


product2










Present
TiN
0.3
TiCN
13
TiCNO
0.5
13
26.8


product3










Present
TiC
0.3
TiCN
8
TiCNO
0.5
8
16.8


product4










Present
TiN
0.3
TiCN
8
TiCNO
0.5
8
16.8


product5










Present
TiN
0.3
TiCN
8
TiCNO
0.5
8
16.8


product6










Present
TiN
0.3
TiCN
8
TiCNO
0.5
8
16.8


product7










Present
TiN
0.3
TiCN
8
TiCNO
0.5
8
16.8


product8










Present
TiN
0.3
TiCN
8
TiCNO
0.5
8
16.8


product9










Present
TiN
0.3
TiCN
8
TiCNO
0.5
8
16.8


product10










Present
TiN
0.3
TiCN
8
TiAlCNO
0.5
8
16.8


product11










Present
TiN
0.3
TiCN
8
TiCNO
0.5
8
16.8


product12










Present
TiC
0.3
TiCN
8
TiCO
0.5
8
16.8


product13










Present
TiN
0.3
TiCN
8
TiAlCO
0.5
8
16.8


product14










Comparative
TiN
0.2
TiCN
1
TiCNO
0.3
1
2.5


product1










Comparative
TiN
0.5
TiCN
15
TiCNO
0.5
17
33.0


product2










Comparative
TiN
0.3
TiCN
8
TiCNO
0.5
8
16.8


product3










Comparative
TiN
0.3
TiCN
8
TiCNO
0.5
8
16.8


product4










Comparative
TiN
0.3
TiCN
8
TiCNO
0.5
8
16.8


product5










Comparative
TiN
0.3
TiCN
8
TiCNO
0.5
8
16.8


product6










Comparative
TiN
0.3
TiCN
8
TiCNO
0.5
8
16.8


product7










Comparative
TiN
0.3
TiCN
8
TiCNO
0.5
8
16.8


product8










Comparative
TiN
0.3
TiCN
8
TiCNO
0.5
8
16.8


product9










Comparative
TiN
0.3
TiCN
8
TiCNO
0.5
8
16.8


product10









With regard to Present products 1 to 14, after forming the coating layer, the dry shot-blasting was applied to the rake face and the flank face, respectively, under the conditions shown in Table 3. At this time, when the rake face was to be processed, the flank face was masked so that the projection materials did not hit thereto. When the flank face was to be processed, the rake face was masked.


With regard to Comparative products 1 to 9, after forming the coating layer, the dry shot-blasting or the wet shot-blasting was applied under the conditions shown in Table 4. With regard to Comparative product 10, neither the dry shot-blasting nor the wet shot-blasting was applied.














TABLE 3








Average







particle size





of projection
Projection
Projection



Shot-
Projection
materials
speed
angle


Sample No.
blasting
materials
(μm)
(m/sec)
(°)




















Present
Dry
cBN
120
120
10


product 1


Present
Dry
cBN
100
120
5


product 2


Present
Dry
cBN
120
120
10


product 3


Present
Dry
cBN
120
120
10


product 4


Present
Dry
cBN
120
120
10


product 5


Present
Dry
cBN
120
120
10


product 6


Present
Dry
cBN
120
120
10


product 7


Present
Dry
cBN
120
120
10


product 8


Present
Dry
cBN
120
150
10


product 9


Present
Dry
cBN
120
100
10


product 10


Present
Dry
cBN
120
120
10


product 11


Present
Dry
cBN
120
120
10


product 12


Present
Dry
cBN
120
120
10


product 13


Present
Dry
cBN
120
120
10


product 14





















TABLE 4








Average







particle size





of projection
Projection
Projection



Shot-
Projection
materials
speed
angle


Sample No.
blasting
materials
(μm)
(m/sec)
(°)




















Comparative
Dry
cBN
120
120
60


product 1


Comparative
Wet
Al2O3
30
100
45


product 2


Comparative
Wet
Al2O3
30
100
45


product 3


Comparative
Wet
Al2O3
30
100
45


product 4


Comparative
Dry
Al2O3
120
120
45


product 5


Comparative
Dry
Al2O3
120
120
45


product 6


Comparative
Wet
Al2O3
30
100
45


product 7


Comparative
Dry
Al2O3
120
120
45


product 8


Comparative
Dry
Al2O3
120
120
60


product 9








Comparative
No treatment


product 10









The residual stress of the α type aluminum oxide layer was measured by the sin2ψ method using an X-ray stress measurement apparatus. The measured results of the residual stress of the α type aluminum oxide layer are shown in Table 5.











TABLE 5









α type aluminum oxide layer










Residual stress
Residual stress



value A (MPa) at
value B (MPa) at


Sample No.
(116) plane (MPa)
(012) plane (MPa)












Present product 1
200
−400


Present product 2
50
−300


Present product 3
200
−400


Present product 4
200
−400


Present product 5
200
−400


Present product 6
200
−400


Present product 7
200
−400


Present product 8
200
−400


Present product 9
50
−700


Present product 10
400
−200


Present product 11
200
−400


Present product 12
200
−400


Present product 13
250
−320


Present product 14
190
−360


Comparative product 1
−30
−200


Comparative product 2
400
100


Comparative product 3
400
100


Comparative product 4
400
100


Comparative product 5
−200
−300


Comparative product 6
−200
−300


Comparative product 7
550
200


Comparative product 8
−200
−1000


Comparative product 9
−100
−900


Comparative product 10
730
620









An atomic ratio of C based on the total of C and N [C/(C+N)] contained in the TiCN layer was measured by using EPMA. Specifically, an atomic ratio at the position of 50 μm from the cutting edge of the coated cutting tool toward the center portion of the rake face was measured by EPMA.












TABLE 6








TiCN



Sample No.
C/(C + N)



















Present product 1
0.8



Present product 2
0.8



Present product 3
0.8



Present product 4
0.8



Present product 5
0.7



Present product 6
0.9



Present product 7
0.8



Present product 8
0.8



Present product 9
0.8



Present product 10
0.8



Present product 11
0.8



Present product 12
0.8



Present product 13
0.75



Present product 14
0.6



Comparative product 1
0.8



Comparative product 2
0.8



Comparative product 3
0.6



Comparative product 4
0.95



Comparative product 5
0.8



Comparative product 6
0.8



Comparative product 7
0.8



Comparative product 8
0.8



Comparative product 9
0.8



Comparative product 10
0.8










By using the obtained samples (tools), Cutting test 1 and Cutting test 2 were carried out. Cutting test 1 is a test to evaluate wear resistance of the tool. Cutting test 2 is a test to evaluate fracture resistance of the tool.


[Cutting Test 1]

  • Work piece material: FCD600
  • Shape of work piece material: Disc having φ180 mm×L20 mm (a square hole with φ75 mm at the center of the disc)
  • Cutting speed: 150 m/min
  • Feed: 0.35 mm/rev
  • Depth of cut: 2.0 mm
  • Coolant: Used


In Cutting test 1, the work piece material was cut using the sample to measure the life of the sample (tool). Specifically, the processing time until a maximum wear width of the flank face of the sample reached 0.3 mm was measured.


[Cutting Test 2]

  • Work piece material: FC200
  • Shape of work piece material: Disc having φ180 mm×L20 mm with two grooves having a width of 15 mm (a hole with φ65 mm at the center of the disc)
  • Cutting speed: 400 m/min
  • Feed: 0.35 mm/rev
  • Depth of cut: 2.0 mm
  • Coolant: Used


In Cutting test 2, the work piece material was cut using the sample to measure the life of the sample (tool). Specifically, the number of impacts until the sample was fractured or the maximum wear width of the flank face of the sample reached 0.3 mm was measured. The number of impacts means a number of times in which the sample and the work piece material have been contacted. When the number of impacts reached 20,000 times, the test was finished. Five specimens were prepared for each sample. With regard to each sample, the number of impacts was measured five times. An average value of the number of impacts which had been measured five times was calculated.












TABLE 7









Cutting test 1
Cutting test 2



Wear test
Fracture test












Tool life
Damaged
Tool life
Damaged


Sample No.
(min)
state
(times)
state














Present
45
Normal wear
18000
Fractured


product 1


Present
35
Normal wear
20000
Normal wear


product 2


Present
55
Normal wear
16000
Fractured


product 3


Present
45
Normal wear
18000
Fractured


product 4


Present
40
Normal wear
19000
Fractured


product 5


Present
50
Normal wear
17000
Fractured


product 6


Present
45
Normal wear
17000
Fractured


product 7


Present
45
Normal wear
18000
Fractured


product 8


Present
40
Normal wear
19500
Fractured


product 9


Present
45
Normal wear
17000
Fractured


product 10


Present
45
Normal wear
18000
Fractured


product 11


Present
45
Normal wear
18000
Fractured


product 12


Present
38
Normal wear
17000
Fractured


product 13


Present
35
Normal wear
16500
Fractured


product 14


Comparative
10
Normal wear
18000
Fractured


product 1


Comparative
20
Fractured
3000
Fractured


product 2


Comparative
15
Normal wear
12000
Fractured


product 3


Comparative
25
Chipping
8000
Fractured


product 4


Comparative
20
Peeling of
7000
Fractured


product 5

coating film


Comparative
30
Normal wear
11000
Fractured


product 6


Comparative
45
Normal wear
5000
Fractured


product 7


Comparative
20
Normal wear
18000
Fractured


product 8


Comparative
25
Normal wear
17000
Fractured


product 9


Comparative
35
Fractured
1500
Fractured


product 10









As shown in Table 7, wear resistance and fracture resistance of Present products are improved. Present products had longer processing times until these reached the tool life and had much number of impacts than those of Comparative products. From these results, it can be understood that the tool lives of Present products are markedly longer than those of Comparative products.


UTILIZABILITY IN INDUSTRY

The coated cutting tool of the present invention has high wear resistance and excellent fracture resistance. The coated cutting tool of the present invention has longer life than those of the conventional tools, so that it has high utilizability in industry.

Claims
  • 1-8. (canceled)
  • 9. A coated cutting tool which comprises a substrate and a coating layer formed on a surface of the substrate, wherein the coating layer contains an α-type aluminum oxide layer,a residual stress value of the α-type aluminum oxide layer at a (116) plane is greater than 0, anda residual stress value of the α-type aluminum oxide layer at a (012) plane is smaller than 0.
  • 10. The coated cutting tool according to claim 9, wherein if the residual stress value of the α-type aluminum oxide layer at the (116) plane is given by A, then A is 20≦A≦500 MPa, andif the residual stress value of the α-type aluminum oxide layer at the (012) plane is given by B, then B is −800≦B≦−100 MPa.
  • 11. The coated cutting tool according to claim 9, wherein the residual stress value is a value measured by a sin2ψ method.
  • 12. The coated cutting tool according to claim 9, wherein an average thickness of the α-type aluminum oxide layer is 1 to 15 μm.
  • 13. The coated cutting tool according to claim 9, wherein the tool further comprises a Ti compound layer containing a compound of a Ti element and at least one element selected from the group consisting of C, N, O and B, andthe Ti compound layer is formed between the substrate and the α-type aluminum oxide layer.
  • 14. The coated cutting tool according to claim 13, wherein the Ti compound layer contains a TiCN layer, andan atomic ratio of C based on a total of C and N [C/(C+N)] contained in the TiCN layer is 0.7≦C/(C+N)≦0.9.
  • 15. The coated cutting tool according to claim 13, wherein an average thickness of the coating layer is 3 to 30 μm, andan average thickness of the Ti compound layer is 2 to 15 μm.
  • 16. The coated cutting tool according to claim 9, wherein the substrate is a cemented carbide, cermet, ceramics or a cubic boron nitride sintered body.
  • 17. The coated cutting tool according to claim 9, wherein if the residual stress value of the α-type aluminum oxide layer at the (116) plane is given by A, then A is 20≦A≦500 MPa;if the residual stress value of the α-type aluminum oxide layer at the (012) plane is given by B, then B is −800≦B≦−100 MPa; andthe residual stress value is a value measured by a sin2ψ method.
  • 18. The coated cutting tool according to claim 9, wherein an average thickness of the α-type aluminum oxide layer is 1 to 15 μm;the tool further comprises a Ti compound layer containing a compound of a Ti element and at least one element selected from the group consisting of C, N, O and B, andthe Ti compound layer is formed between the substrate and the α-type aluminum oxide layer.
  • 19. The coated cutting tool according to claim 18, wherein the Ti compound layer contains a TiCN layer, andan atomic ratio of C based on a total of C and N [C/(C+N)] contained in the TiCN layer is 0.7≦C/(C+N)≦0.9.
  • 20. The coated cutting tool according to claim 19, wherein an average thickness of the coating layer is 3 to 30 μm, andan average thickness of the Ti compound layer is 2 to 15 μm.
  • 21. The coated cutting tool according to claim 20, wherein the substrate is a cemented carbide, cermet, ceramics or a cubic boron nitride sintered body.
  • 22. The coated cutting tool according to claim 9, wherein an average thickness of the coating layer is 3 to 30 μm;an average thickness of the a-type aluminum oxide layer is 1 to 15 μm;the tool comprises a Ti compound layer formed between the substrate and the α-type aluminum oxide layer;the Ti compound layer contains a TiCN layer; andan atomic ratio of C based on a total of C and N [C/(C+N)] contained in the TiCN layer is 0.7≦C/(C+N)≦0.9.
  • 23. The coated cutting tool according to claim 22, wherein if the residual stress value of the α-type aluminum oxide layer at the (116) plane is given by A, then A is 20≦A≦500 MPa, andif the residual stress value of the α-type aluminum oxide layer at the (012) plane is given by B, then B is −800≦B≦−100 MPa.
  • 24. The coated cutting tool according to claim 23, wherein the substrate is a cemented carbide, cermet, ceramics or a cubic boron nitride sintered body.
  • 25. The coated cutting tool according to claim 22, wherein the substrate is a cemented carbide, cermet, ceramics or a cubic boron nitride sintered body.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
2013-232520 Nov 2013 JP national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/JP2014/079548 11/7/2014 WO 00