Patent Grant
11431544
The present disclosure relates to a coding and modulation apparatus and method. Further, the present disclosure relates to a transmission apparatus and method. Still further, the present disclosure relates to a computer program and a non-transitory computer-readable recording medium.
Modern communications systems typically employ, among other elements, a coding and modulation apparatus (as part of a transmission apparatus) and a decoding and demodulation apparatus (as part of a receiving apparatus). The coding and modulation apparatus is often part of a so called BICM (Bit Interleaved Coded Modulation) apparatus, which generally comprises (at the transmitter side) a serial concatenation of a FEC (Forward Error Correction) encoder, a bit interleaver, and a modulator, which uses spectral efficient modulation such as multilevel PAM (Pulse Amplitude Modulation), PSK (Phase Shift Keying), or QAM (Quadrature Amplitude Modulation). It should be noted that hereinafter, whenever QAM is mentioned it should be understood as a generally term covering PAM, PSK and QAM.
BICM allows for good performance over both non-fading and fading channels due to the use of the interleaver and/or the FEC encoder. It has a reasonable decoding complexity as opposed to multilevel coding (MLC) coding schemes and is thus used frequently in communications systems, such as in all DVB systems, powerline communications (e.g., Homeplug AV, DAB, LTE, WiFi, etc.).
Generally, the coding and modulation capacity, such as the BICM capacity in systems using a BICM apparatus, is considered as a target function, and it is desired to find optimum constellation points such that this capacity is maximized, often subject to a power normalization, i.e., the average power of the constellation points should be normalized to e.g. 1.
The “background” description provided herein is for the purpose of generally presenting the context of the disclosure. Work of the presently named inventor(s), to the extent it is described in this background section, as well as aspects of the description which may not otherwise qualify as prior art at the time of filing, are neither expressly or impliedly admitted as prior art against the present disclosure.
It is an object to provide a coding and modulation apparatus and method providing an increased or even maximized coding and modulation capacity. It is a further object to provide a demodulation and decoding apparatus and method as well as a corresponding computer program for implementing said methods and a non-transitory computer-readable recording medium for implementing said methods.
According to an aspect there is provided a coding and modulation apparatus comprising
According to a further aspect there is provided a transmission apparatus comprising
According to still further aspects corresponding methods, a computer program comprising program means for causing a computer to carry out the steps of the coding and modulation method disclosed herein, when said computer program is carried out on a computer, as well as a non-transitory computer-readable recording medium that stores therein a computer program product, which, when executed by a processor, causes the coding and modulation method disclosed herein to be performed are provided.
Preferred embodiments are defined in the dependent claims. It shall be understood that the claimed methods, the claimed computer program and the claimed computer-readable recording medium have similar and/or identical preferred embodiments as the claimed apparatus and as defined in the dependent claims.
One of the aspects of the disclosure is that the constellation points of the used constellations are not located on a regular grid with equidistant symbols, but rather on optimized locations, dependent on the channel characteristics, e.g., channel transition probabilities due to AWGN (Additive White Gaussian Noise), fading, etc. Further, the used constellation is selected (preferably in advance, but generally on the fly in other embodiments) dependent on the SNR (signal-to-noise ratio) and the desired total number of constellation points of the used constellation. A method how to find and optimize these non-uniform constellations (in the following called NUCs) will be explained below.
It should be noted that to every M-QAM, one can also think of the underlying sqrt(M)-PAM. Further, it should be noted that in other aspects the group of constellations defined in the claims comprises less constellations, e.g. only constellations for non-fading channels, only constellations for fading channels, only constellations for selected values of M, only constellation for M-QAM or sqrt(M)-PAM and/or constellations for less SNR values. In other words, less constellations may be contained in the group of constellations available for selection and subsequent use by the modulator, i.e. the group of constellations available for use by the modulator may comprise one or more of the constellations defined in the claims. Accordingly, the present disclosure is also directed to a coding and modulation apparatus and method that have a smaller group of constellations available for use (as explained above) and/or where less constellations are available for a particular value of M.
A QAM mapping consisting of M constellation points is denoted as M-QAM. If a (uniform or non-uniform) QAM allows separate encoding and decoding of each of its two dimensions (“inphase” and “quadrature phase” in the literature), then this QAM will be called a N2-QAM. This implies that the constellation can be designed by two N-PAM constellations, one for each dimension. N2-QAMs have significantly lower decoding complexity for ML-decoding, as only N constellation points have to be investigated, compared with N2 points for the M-QAM, when M=N2, but when the two dimensions cannot be separated (as is usually the case for N-PSK, e.g. 8-PSK, where 8 points are located on a unit circle). In addition QAM constellations that are completely defined by a single quadrant of the constellation will be called Q-QAM, with the other quadrants being derived from the first quadrant. E.g. normal uniform square QAM constellations (UC) are also Q-QAM constellations, due to their symmetry.
However, the constellation points of the QAM constellations considered in this disclosure are not located on a regular grid with equidistant symbols, but rather on optimized locations, dependent on the channel characteristics, e.g., channel transition probabilities due to AWGN, fading, etc.
It should be noted that the constellation position vector w as defined in the claims must not necessarily contain the constellation points of the first quadrant of the constellation, but could also contain the constellation points of any of the four quadrants (expressed by the definition “of a first quadrant” in the claims). Due to the quadrant symmetry this leads to constellations with a different bit mapping but with identical performance. The constellation position vector w in the tables defined herein should therefore be considered as an example for all four symmetric constellations with different bit mapping but identical performance.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description of the disclosure and the following detailed description are exemplary, but are not restrictive, of the disclosure.
A more complete appreciation of the disclosure and many of the attendant advantages thereof will be readily obtained as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Referring now to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals designate identical or corresponding parts throughout the several views,
It should be noted that the constellation position vector w as defined in the claims must not necessarily contain the constellation points of the first quadrant of the constellation, but could also contain the constellation points of any of the four quadrants (expressed by the definition “of a first quadrant” in the claims). Due to the quadrant symmetry this leads to constellations with a different bit mapping but with identical performance. The constellation position vector w in the tables defined herein should therefore be considered as an example for all four symmetric constellations with different bit mapping but identical performance.
In other embodiments of the coding and modulation apparatus 10 additional elements may be provided, such as a BCH encoder, an LCPC encoder, a bit interleaver and/or a demultiplexer (for demultiplexing bits of encoded data into the cell words). Some or all of these elements may separate elements or may be part of the encoder 11. For instance, a BICM device as conventionally used in the transmission apparatus of a DVB system may be used as coding and modulation apparatus 10.
In other embodiments of the transmission apparatus 20 addition elements may be provided, such as an input processing unit, a frame building unit and/or an OFDM generation unit as e.g. conventionally used in transmission apparatus of a DVB system.
A receiving apparatus 40 generally comprises a receiver 41 that receives one or more transmission streams, a deconverter 42 that deconverts the received one or more transmission streams into constellation values, and a demodulation and decoding apparatus 43 that demodulates and decodes said constellation values into output data. The demodulation and decoding apparatus 43 generally comprises a demodulator 44 for demodulating constellation values of a non-uniform constellation into cell words, and a decoder 45 for decoding cell words into output data words, wherein based on the total number M of constellation points of the constellation, the signal-to-noise ratio in dB and the channel characteristics, a non-uniform constellation is selected from the group of constellations comprising the same predetermined constellations as used in the coding and modulation apparatus 10.
The preferred demodulation and decoding considers soft values as opposed to hard decided values (0 and 1). Soft values represent the continuously distributed received values (possibly after A/D conversion including quantization) by more than two states (as in the case of binary (hard) decision). The reason is that for hard decision, the NUCs are generally not optimal. Nowadays, BICM receivers typically are soft receivers anyway.
Generally, data (e.g. communications data, broadcast data, etc.) shall be transmitted from a transmission apparatus 20 to one or more of said receiving apparatus 40 over a transmission channel 50, 50′. The transmission channel 50, 50′ can be unicast channel, multicast channel, a broadcast channel and may be employed as one-directional or bi-directional channel (i.e. having a return channel from the receiving apparatus to the transmission apparatus).
In an embodiment the modulator 12 is configured to use a non-uniform constellation based on the total number M of constellation points of the constellation, the required signal-to-noise ratio SNR for error free decoding in dB and the channel characteristics. In broadcasting applications the constellation is generally not selected dependent on the SNR in the receiver, but dependent on the SNR that is required for error free decoding with a used channel code (if a code is used, for example LDPC codes in case of DVB 2nd generation transmission systems) for an expected channel characteristic, e.g., static reception or multipath fading.
The total number M of constellation points is generally selected according to the desired payload throughput jointly with the code rate of the FEC encoder. The SNR for error free decoding for typical channel characteristic is generally known, e.g. by simulation. In broadcasting the channel characteristics of the receivers are not known, i.e. a compromise is selected. For instance, in broadcasting for each code rate of the FEC encoder one non-uniform constellation is selected, optimized for an SNR that is a compromise for all channel characteristics.
The transmitter generally targets a certain scenario. For instance, a broadcast transmission over cable or satellite considers the channel to be just a non-fading AWGN (appropriate channel model), while a terrestrial broadcaster typically considers the channel to be a fading channel, e.g. with Rayleigh distribution, as several echoes are usually received.
In another embodiment the modulator 12 is configured to adaptively select a non-uniform constellation based on the total number M of constellation points of the constellation, the signal-to-noise ratio SNR in dB and the channel characteristics, wherein said signal-to-noise ratio SNR in dB and channel characteristics are received from a receiving device 40 to which data shall be transmitted. Such an adaptive selection of the constellation is generally only possible with a return channel in unicast environments. A non-uniform constellation may be adapted e.g. in time and/or frequency domain, e.g. for different OFDM sub carriers.
Depending on the SNR the optimum value for M and the code rate of the FEC encoder can be selected, which offers the highest throughput (equivalent to CB). In other words, for a large SNR a high value of M is selected leading to a high data throughput (and vice versa).
The channel characteristics describe the statistical properties of the channel, e.g., the extent of the multipath propagation of the transmission channel between transmitter and receiver. If the channel is characterized by no multipath propagation, corresponding to the AWGN channel, the required SNR for error free decoding is relatively low, i.e. the NUC has to be selected accordingly for optimum performance. If the transmission channel is characterized by strong multipath propagation, the required SNR for error free reception is larger compared to a channel without multipath propagation, i.e. a NUC optimized for higher SNR has to be used. Further, the NUCs should be optimized taking the fading characteristics into account, as will be discussed below.
As mentioned above, the number M of the constellation points of the constellations is selected according to the desired payload throughput. Larger values of M allow for higher data throughput, but require a larger SNR for error free reception. This is further influenced by the code rate of the FEC encoder, if any FEC encoder is used.
Another explanation (which is closely related to the optimization task) is that for each SNR, optimized constellations are proposed for different M. The optimization target is the BICM capacity. For an expected SNR, say 15 dB of SNR should be guaranteed, M is chosen, for which the respective optimized NUC yields the largest BICM capacity. As a general rule it holds that for low SNR a low value of M should be selected and vice versa. But from a theoretical point of view, it turns out that high M is generally optimum, e.g., choosing M=4096 or M=1024 is preferred, because even for low SNR, the optimized NUC will “look (almost) like” a constellation with effectively smaller M, as several points will overlap. However, modulation and demodulation complexity increase with increasing M, so a tradeoff has to be considered.
As mentioned above known communications systems often employ among other blocks a so called BICM apparatus which may also be used as coding and modulation apparatus according to the present disclosure. The maximum possible capacity over a BICM apparatus is described by the BICM capacity CB:
where I denotes the i-th bit label of the constellation point, and m is the total number of bits/QAM symbol point. Altogether the QAM constellation consists of M=2m constellation points, each assigned a particular bit label (00 . . . 00, 00 . . . 01, . . . , 11 . . . 11). In (1), E[·] denotes expectation operator, p(rk) is the probability density function (pdf) of the received symbols, sk is the transmitted symbol according to a particular bit label, k is the discrete time (or subcarrier index in case of OFDM modulation), xl is a particular symbol of the set of all constellation symbols, this set being denoted by (=symbol alphabet, with cardinality M=2m).
p(rk|sk=xl) is the likelihood function (transition probability—defined by the channel characteristics) that rk is received given the fact that sk=xl was transmitted. The subset bi includes all symbols from
, where the i-th bit label is b (either b=0 or b=1).
As seen in (1), CB is a 2-dimensional integral. If only constellations are considered that can be split into two 1-dim. PAM constellations, it is easy to see that
CB(2-dim.)=2×CB(1-dim.) (2)
All investigated channels here include AWGN (only or after the fading channel). This can be described by the signal-to-noise ratio SNR, typically in dB:
SNR=10*log10(Es/σ2), (3)
where Es is the average symbol power of the QAM constellation (typically normalized to 1), and σ2 is the variance (=power) of the additive white Gaussian noise (which is assumed to be of zero-mean).
In (2), the 1-dimensional consideration for CB (1-dim.) uses an N-PAM constellation, which has only half the symbol power, if just the projection on the in-phase or quadrature-phase, respectively, is taken. However, if again a power normalization to 1 is considered, the noise variance by a factor of 2 is increased. Thus, to be more precise, the target function for the optimization process considered is given by
CB(2-dim. at SNR x)=2×CB(1-dim. at SNR x/2), (4)
where the 1-dimensional PAM has normalized power 1, thus just half the SNR (here, in absolute values, i.e. not in dB) as explained above. The 1-dimensional BICM capacity is also computed according to (1), where the 2-dimensional integral becomes a 1-dimensional integral with rk∈,
being the set of real numbers.
This equation (4) is optimized, given all degrees of freedom, namely the constellation points of the underlying 1-dim. constellation, subject to the power constraint, i.e.
For example, a regular 4-QAM consists of constellation points (ejπ/4, ej7π/4, e3π/4, ej5π/4), as can be seen in
The above example can be extended to higher order N2-QAMs, with N>2. Then the underlying N-PAM describes for one component the 1st, 3rd, 5th and so on bit label, while for the other component it describes the 2nd, 4th, 6th and so on label.
Constellation shaping is generally known and has a long history. Only in recent years, constellations were investigated which maximize the BICM capacity CB. In [6], the authors propose an heuristic approach to maximize CB by forcing the underlying PAM to approach a Gauss-like form (as is well known from Shannon's capacity theorem, the optimum constellation over the AWGN channel should have a Gaussian distribution; note that this means that there is an infinite number of continuously distributed input signals, having a Gaussian distribution, i.e., symbols with small power should occur more frequently than symbols with large power). There is no proof that this maximizes CB, indeed those NUCs designed according to this method do not maximize CB. The resulting NUCs are in general no N2 NUCs, i.e., a 2-dimensional NUC was optimized, not the underlying PAM. However, in N. Muhammad, “Coding and modulation for spectral efficient transmission”, Ph.D. dissertation, Universität Stuttgart, Institut für Nachrichtenübertragung, Pfaffenwaldring 47, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany, June 2006, the first time constellations have been directly optimized with respect to the target function CB.. For this method two differences to the current method occur:
As described above, two problems arise when solving the optimization:
With respect to problem a) (improper integral: integration border selection), as seen in eq. (1), the BICM capacity involves an integral from − infinity to + infinity (=improper integral). Any numerical solution of this integral has to consider finite integration borders such as from −b to +b, with b sufficiently large. Matlab provides several functions for numerical integration, even for improper integrals, such as the function “quad”, which internally optimizes the appropriate integration borders b. However, it has been observed that even these functions yield numerical instabilities and do not end up with the correct integral.
It can be observed that the integrant in (1) approaches 0 if the variable rk is sufficiently large (b→Inf). So a naïve approach would be to stepwise increase the variable rk, until the integrant falls below a certain threshold (say 10−300 or if it even becomes exactly 0) and chose this value for the integration border b. However, it has further been observed that the integrant can take on very small values even before it converges to 0 for large variables, as can be seen in the two examples depicted in
Note that for 30 dB, many very small integrant values occur in the interval [−2,2] and any optimized integration border would be misleading in this interval. Thus, it is proposed to find the optimum (=numerically correct) integration border b as follows:
With respect to problem b) (integrant) it has further been observed that the integrant of the BICM capacity integral can cause numerical instabilities for large SNR values. As can be seen in eq. (1), the integrant consists of sums, including terms such as
x*log(x), x*log(1/x), or x*1/log(x).
The value of x is e.g. the transition probability p(rk|s_k=xl), or a pdf or includes parts thereof. The values of x become increasingly small (even approaching 0) if the SNR is very large, as the pdfs typically correspond to Gaussian distributions. Thus, the following limits might occur:
lim{x
Note that in theory, each limit converges to 0 (see l'Hospital's rule), but in a numerical computation, values such as + or − infinite or NaN (“not a number”) will occur. Thus, the following is proposed: during the computation of each element (i.e., each addend in the integrant of (1)), the value has to be checked if it is finite (otherwise infinite or NaN), and replace it by 0 in case it is not finite. Only this way, reliable integration results can be obtained.
The presented optimization is preferably based on the Matlab's fmincon function for constrained nonlinear optimization: the target function is the BICM capacity, the constraints are as follows:
The function fmincon requires an initial set of dof, where the values were taken from a regular, i.e. uniform constellation, but a random mutation was applied on them. It is to be noted that the resulting values should still be in increasing order, otherwise the Gray bit labeling is not fulfilled anymore. The NUCs will be described by their degrees of freedom, e.g., a 64-NUC optimized for the AWGN channel at SNR=11.5 dB yields the following values (optimized degrees of freedom):
As described before, the first entry (1.6405) corresponds to the bit label 000, the next one (1.0073) to 001 and so on. The 2-dim. 64-NUC is then obtained by symmetry, where both in-phase and quadrature-phase component of the NUC are based on the 8-PAM NUC.
The creation of the 2-dim. NUC based on the optimized degrees of freedom will be explained in more detail below.
Since the performance of NUCs depends on the SNR value they are optimized for, a thorough selection is preferably carried out depending on the (FEC) code rate to achieve optimum performance. If the channel characteristics are known, the required SNR value for FEC convergence can be determined by simulation. Then the NUC that has been optimized for this SNR value is chosen for best performance. If the SNR at the receiver is lower than this SNR decoding threshold, the constellation is not optimal. However, this is no drawback, since the BICM capacity is too low for successful decoding anyhow. On the other hand if the SNR at the receiver is clearly higher than the decoding threshold, a sufficient amount of BICM capacity for successful decoding is available, even though the NUC is suboptimal for this SNR range. Therefore, the NUC needs to be optimized for the SNR value at the waterfall region (i.e., decoding threshold for (quasi-) error free decoding) of the FEC. As the SNR value of the waterfall region depends on the code rate of the FEC, a different NUC is selected for each code rate.
The SNR value for (quasi-) error free decoding also depends on the channel characteristics of the receiver. For instance the required SNR for error free decoding of the DVB-T2 LDPC code in the AWGN channel is 0.8 dB, whereas 2.5 dB are required in the Rayleigh P1 multipath channel. The selected NUC for each code rate is thus not optimal in all channel environments and a tradeoff is necessary in a broadcasting environment that suits all (or most) users in the network. In a point-to-point network with return channel, the optimal NUC may be selected based on the measured channel characteristics in the receiver.
In the following some more explanation is provided regarding the definition of the non-uniform QAM constellations. Each input cell word (y0,q . . . ym−1,q) (i.e. provided to the modulator) shall be modulated using a non-uniform QAM constellation to give a constellation point zq prior to normalization, where m corresponds to the number of bits per QAM symbol m=log2(M). It should be noted that the parameter q used here for discrete time or subcarrier index corresponds to the parameter k as used in the above. The exact values of the real and imaginary components Re(zq) and Im(zq) for each combination of the relevant input bits y0 . . . m−1,q are given in the following tables for the various constellation sizes depending on the NUC position vector.
In the following the Q-NUC optimization will be described, i.e. the optimization of a 2-dimensional constellation that is derived from a single quadrant. The above described optimization of a N2-QAM requires the optimization of sqrt(M)/2−1 degrees of freedom. Since the optimization of a 2-dimensional QAM constellation has 2*M degrees of freedom (real and imaginary part of each constellation point) the optimization is significantly more time consuming. This is also caused by the need of calculating the BICM capacity during the optimization for the 2-dimensional case instead of the 1-dimensional case. Since the optimum 2D-constellations for the 16-QAM case are symmetric with respect to the different quadrants of the constellations, the following simplifications can be applied during the optimization: Only one quadrant of the constellation is optimized during the constellation, reducing the degrees of freedom during the optimization from 2*M to M/2. From this quadrant the remaining quadrants can be derived, leading to a so called QQAM constellation. However, care must be taken to ensure that the properties of the bit labeling of the constellation points are retained. If the first quadrant is Gray-Mapped, offering a maximum Hamming distance of 1, the same must be ensured for the remaining quadrants of the QQAM constellation. This is ensured by the algorithm defined below.
To uniquely define a 16-QQAM only 8 real values are required, corresponding to 4 complex values representing the constellation points of the first quadrant. Based on the QQAM approach 16-QQAM, 32-QQAM, 64QQAM, 256-QQAM and 1024-QQAM constellations have been optimized, clearly outperforming the N2-QAM constellations, especially in the low SNR regime. The performance of the 16-QQAM, 32-QQAM, 64-QQAM, 256-QQAM and 1024-QQAM constellations is depicted in
In the following the definition of the NUC position vectors obtained by use of the above described approach for obtaining QQAM constellations is provided. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is always denoted in dB.
a) 16QQAM—AWGN Channel
b) 32QQAM—AWGN Channel
c) 64QQAM—AWGN Channel
d) 256QQAM—AWGN Channel
e) 1kQQAM—AWGN Channel
Next, a definition of the QQAM constellation shall be provided. Each input cell word (y0, . . . , ym−1) shall be modulated using a non-uniform QQAM constellations to give a constellation point zq prior to normalization, where m corresponds to the number of bits per QAM symbol m=log2(M). The vector of complex constellation points x0 . . . M−1 for all combinations of the input bits y0 . . . m−1 (corresponding to the decimal values 0 to M−1) are given in the above shown tables for the various constellation sizes depending on the QQAM position vector w0 . . . b−1, which defines the constellation point positions of a first quadrant of the non-uniform constellation. The length b of the QQAM position vector w is defined by b=M/4. The QQAM position vector defines a first quadrant of the constellation (e.g. representing the first quadrant of a cartesian coordinate system according to which the constellation is oriented), namely the constellation points with the decimal values 0 (e.g. y0 . . . m=0000 in case of a 16-QQAM) to b−1 (e.g. y0 . . . m=0011 in case of a 16-QQAM), while the constellation points of the remaining quadrants are derived as follows:
x0 . . . b−1=w0 . . . b−1 (1. quadrant I)
xb . . . 2b−1=conj(w0 . . . b−1) (2. quadrant II)
x2b . . . 3b−1=−conj(w0 . . . b−1) (3. quadrant IV)
x3b . . . 4b−1=−w0 . . . b−1 (4. quadrant III)
with conj being the complex conjugate. For example, for SNR=2 dB, the corresponding constellation point zq for a 16-QQAM defined by the QQAM position vector (w0 . . . 3)=(0.5879+0.4053i, 1.0566+0.6114i, 0.4053+0.5879i, 0.6114+1.0566i) and the input cell word (y0 . . . ym−1)=(1100) is x12=−w0=−0.5879−0.4053i. The complete constellation for this NUC position vector for SNR=2 dB for 16-QQAM is shown in the
As mentioned above the constellation position vector w as defined herein does not necessarily contain the constellation points of the first quadrant of the constellation, but could also contain the constellation points of any of the four quadrants. Due to the quadrant symmetry this leads to constellations with a different bit mapping but with identical performance. The constellation position vector w in the tables defined herein should therefore be considered as an example for all four symmetric constellations with different bit mapping but identical performance.
Obviously, numerous modifications and variations of the present disclosure are possible in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the disclosure may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein (e.g., if the NUC position vectors are rounded to a smaller number of digits).
In the claims, the word “comprising” does not exclude other elements or steps, and the indefinite article “a” or “an” does not exclude a plurality. A single element or other unit may fulfill the functions of several items recited in the claims. The mere fact that certain measures are recited in mutually different dependent claims does not indicate that a combination of these measures cannot be used to advantage.
In so far as embodiments of the disclosure have been described as being implemented, at least in part, by software-controlled data processing apparatus, it will be appreciated that a non-transitory machine-readable medium carrying such software, such as an optical disk, a magnetic disk, semiconductor memory or the like, is also considered to represent an embodiment of the present disclosure. Further, such a software may also be distributed in other forms, such as via the Internet or other wired or wireless telecommunication systems.
A circuit that may be used for implementing one or more of the elements of the claimed apparatus is a structural assemblage of electronic components including conventional circuit elements, integrated circuits including application specific integrated circuits, standard integrated circuits, application specific standard products, and field programmable gate arrays. Further a circuit includes central processing units, graphics processing units, and microprocessors which are programmed or configured according to software code. A circuit does not include pure software, although a circuit includes the above-described hardware executing software.
Any reference signs in the claims should not be construed as limiting the scope.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13166018 | Apr 2013 | EP | regional |
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/447,589, filed Jun. 20, 2019, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/899,501, filed Feb. 20, 2018, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/786,725, filed Oct. 23, 2015 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,906,396), which is a National Stage of International Application No. PCT/EP2014/058719, filed Apr. 29, 2014, and claims priority to European Application No. 13166018.5, filed Apr. 30, 2013, the entire contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8750398 | Ko et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8867640 | Ko et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 9094276 | Ko et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9148251 | Ko et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9680684 | Stadelmeier et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9813279 | Loghin | Nov 2017 | B2 |
| 9906392 | Hwang et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
| 10868706 | Loghin | Dec 2020 | B2 |
| 10958498 | Stadelmeier | Mar 2021 | B2 |
| 20050047517 | Georgios et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050220197 | Noda | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20070115864 | Bar-Ness et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20090034635 | Golitschek Edler Von Elbwart et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090097582 | Barsoum et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090129477 | Yang | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090168909 | Stadelmeier et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090220034 | Ramprashad | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20100210301 | Dietz et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20110090948 | Zhou et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110260327 | Ko et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110274211 | Ko et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20130064313 | Gatti | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20140269960 | Petrov | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140270012 | Sagi | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140314177 | Choi et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20150049844 | Stott | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150163085 | Stadelmeier et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150222471 | Myung et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1490972 | Apr 2004 | CN |
| 1863182 | Nov 2006 | CN |
| 101106435 | Jan 2008 | CN |
| 101291200 | Oct 2008 | CN |
| 101640940 | Feb 2010 | CN |
| 101779453 | Jul 2010 | CN |
| 101867438 | Oct 2010 | CN |
| 102292982 | Dec 2011 | CN |
| 103036845 | Apr 2013 | CN |
| 2 031 786 | Mar 2009 | EP |
| 2 134 051 | Dec 2009 | EP |
| 2 211 493 | Jul 2010 | EP |
| 2 375 666 | Oct 2011 | EP |
| 2 378 666 | Oct 2011 | EP |
| 2010-538502 | Dec 2010 | JP |
| 2010029615 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| 2010078472 | Jul 2010 | WO |
| 2015002507 | Jan 2015 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Liu et al., “APSK Constellation with Gray Mapping,” IEEE Communication Letters, vol. 15, No. 12, XP011389300, (Dec. 2011). pp. 1271-1273. |
| International Search Report issued in corresponding International Application No. PCT/EP14/058719 dated Aug. 22, 2014. |
| Erik Agrell, et al., On the Optimality of the Binary Reflected Gray Code, IEEE Transactions On Information Theory, vol. 50, No. 12, Dec. 2004, 13 pgs. |
| Giuseppe Caire et al., “Bit-Interleaved Coded Modulation”, IEEE Transactions On Information Theory, vol. 44, No. 3, May 1998, pp. 927-946. |
| G. Caire et al., “Capacity of Bit Interleaved Channels”, Electronics Letters, Jun. 6, 1996, vol. 32, No. 12, pp. 1060-1061. |
| Christine Fragouli et al.,“Turbo Codes with Non-Uniform Constellations”, ICC 2001. IEEE International Conference on Communications, 4 pages. |
| Le Goff, Stëphane Y., “Signal Constellations for Bit-Interleaved Coded Modulation”, IEEE Transactions On Information Theory, vol. 49, No. 1, Jan. 2003, p. 307-313 (7 pgs). |
| Haffenden, Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB): Implementation Guidelines for a Second Generation Television Broadcasting System DVB-T2, ETSI TR 102 831, vol. 10.04, 2010, 227 pages / Jan. 1, 2010. |
| Li, Jun, et al., “Rayleigh Flat Fading Channels Capacity”, Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Communication Networks and Services Research Conference (CNSR'05), 0-7695-2333-1/05 $20.00 © 2005 IEEE (4 pgs). |
| MOSS_TM-H1841_TM-NGH1259_Position_Table.pdf (2 pgs) 2011. |
| Muhammad, “Coding and Modulation for Spectral Efficient Transmission”, Institut für Nachrichtenübertragung der Universität Stuttgart, 2010 (173 pgs). |
| Nokia: “16-QAM for GERAN evolution”, 3GPP TSG GERAN#26, Schaumburg, US, Aug. 29-Sep. 2, 2005 (14 pgs). |
| Stott, Jonathan, “CM and BICM Limits for Rectangular Constellations”, JSGBBC 022 Aug. 2012 (92 pgs). |
| STOTT_TM-H2036_TM-NGH1453_Position_Table.pdf (2 pgs) 2012. |
| Wachsmann, et al., “Multilevel Codes: Theoretical Concepts and Practical Design Rules”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 45, No. 5, Jul. 1999, (31 pgs). |
| Chaudhari, (Oct. 7, 2016,), Wireless Pi. Wirelesspi.Com. Retrieved Feb. 23, 2022, from https://wirelesspi.com/quadrature-amplitude-modulation-qam/ (Year: 2016). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20210184910 A1 | Jun 2021 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16447589 | Jun 2019 | US |
| Child | 17184208 | US | |
| Parent | 15899501 | Feb 2018 | US |
| Child | 16447589 | US | |
| Parent | 14786725 | US | |
| Child | 15899501 | US |
