The invention relates to a combinatorial logic circuit.
Logic circuits are used on a very large scale in various applications. The overall trend in the development of logic circuits is increasing their switching speed and lowering their supply voltage for maintaining reasonable power dissipation within the chips. Furthermore, the use of differential-in differential-out circuits has increased for obtaining a maximum output swing for the signals.
Following the above-mentioned trend, current-controlled CMOS circuits have been introduced. U.S. Pat. No. 6,424,194 discloses a family of logic circuits using current-controlled CMOS logic fabricated in conventional CMOS process technology. There are implemented various logic circuits as inverters/buffers, level shifters, NAND, NOR, XOR gates etc. It is observed that when the circuits are provided with more than one input differential signal, there are three levels of transistors between a positive supply terminal VDD and ground e.g. a current source level, a first input level and a second input level when a two-input circuit is considered. Because of the stacking, the supply voltage cannot be lowered below VGS+2(VGS−VT)+ΔV where VGS is the gate-source voltage of one of the CMOS transistors VT is the threshold voltage of the process and ΔV is the voltage drop on the resistors R coupled between the stacked transistors and the positive supply terminal. Dummy transistors are provided at one output of the gates for matching the loading conditions at both outputs. It is observed that due to process variation the common-mode voltage levels in the drains of the output transistors differ, which results in additional noise and limits the maximum output swing.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a combinatorial logic circuit providing a large output swing. This object is achieved in a device comprising:
It is observed that a DC level at the first output terminal is VDD−R1*I1 and a DC level at the second output terminal is VDD−R2*I2. It is desirable to have the DC level at the first output equal to the DC level at the second output for obtaining a relatively large common mode rejection ratio. The current source determines the same DC level at the outputs and therefore increases a common mode rejection ratio of the circuit. As a direct consequence, the output noise is reduced and the output swing is increased.
In an embodiment of the invention the circuit first logic block and the second logic block are substantially identical. When substantially identical circuits are used, the time allocated to the design process is shortened. Furthermore, the first and the second resistor means are preferably resistors of equal resistance. In an embodiment, each block comprises a first transistor coupled in parallel to a second transistor, each transistor receiving a respective first single ended logical signal and second single ended logical signal, said transistors being further coupled to a current source and to a third transistor, which is controlled by a DC signal, the DC signal being substantially equal with an average voltage level between a logical HIGH voltage level and a logical LOW voltage level of the respective first and second single ended signals. Having two substantially identical blocks simplifies the design and implementation of the circuit. Ideally, the output signals are centered to half of the supply voltage of the circuit and the output signals are symmetric to that value. Because of the technological processes involved in obtaining the circuit, the centerline is no longer the ideal one and the output swing is reduced. For obtaining a maximum swing at the output of the circuit it is applied a DC signal acting as a threshold voltage for the circuit, the DC signal being substantially dependent on the levels of the input signals. In this application it is considered that two transistors are coupled in parallel if they have their respective drains or collectors coupled each other and their respective sources or emitters coupled each other.
In another embodiment of the invention, each logic block receives a combination of first and second components of differential signals, the first and the second component being substantially in antiphase to each other. This embodiment is particularly suitable when differential input signals are used. A further advantage is that we may still use the block structure adapted for single ended signals for differential signals.
In another embodiment of the invention each logic block comprises a first circuit coupled to a second circuit, each circuit comprising a first transistor coupled in parallel to a second transistor, said transistors being further coupled to a third transistor, said transistors being controlled by some of the first and second components of the differential signals. In a particular implementation the circuit implements a differential XOR logic function, which is particularly suitable to be used in high-speed communication networks in data and clock recovery blocks, respectively.
The embodiments refer to implementations in MOS technology but using n type channel but the inventive concept may be applied mutatis-mutandis to other technologies as e.g. GaAs, SiGe, etc. and/or using other types of transistors as p channel type transistors, PNP or NPN transistors, etc. As a consequence the terminals gate, source, drain correspond to base, emitter and collector, respectively.
The above and other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description of exemplary embodiments of the invention with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
A first output terminal Q− is coupled to the first block B1 and to the first resistor R1. A second output terminal Q+ is coupled to the second logic block B2 and to the second resistor R2. A first current source I0 is coupled to the first output terminal Q− for providing a first supply current I1 through the first resistor R1, which is substantially equal to a second supply current I2 through the second resistor R2. It is observed that a DC level at the first output terminal is VDD−R1*I1 and a DC level at the second output terminal is VDD−R2*I2. For obtaining a relatively large common mode rejection ratio it is desirable to have the DC level at the first output equal to the DC level at the second output. The current source determines the same DC level at the outputs and therefore increases the common mode rejection ratio of the circuit. As a direct consequence, the output noise is reduced and the output swing is increased. Preferable, the circuit first logic block B1 and the second logic block B2 are substantially identical. When substantially identical circuits are used, the time allocated to the design process is shortened.
Returning to
It is observed that the voltage corresponding to a HIGH logical level is VDD−R*I0 and the voltage corresponding to a LOW logical level is VDD−2*R*I0. Hence, the output voltage swing is determined by the product R*I0. A larger swing gives lower common-mode voltages at the output. This contradicts with the low supply voltage requirements. A differential logic swing of about 400 mVpp . . . 600 mVpp should be sufficient for high-speed applications as e.g. high speed serial communications.
In Table 2, VCM1 refers to the controlling voltage of the block B1 and VCM2 refers to the controlling voltage of the block B2. Practical implementations of the functions are shown in
It is remarked that the scope of protection of the invention is not restricted to the embodiments described herein. Neither is the scope of protection of the invention restricted by the reference numerals in the claims. The word ‘comprising’ does not exclude other parts than those mentioned in the claims. The word ‘a(n)’ preceding an element does not exclude a plurality of those elements. Means forming part of the invention may both be implemented in the form of dedicated hardware or in the form of a programmed processor. The invention resides in each new feature or combination of features.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
04103647 | Jul 2004 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2005/052384 | 7/18/2005 | WO | 00 | 8/15/2007 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2006/013492 | 2/9/2006 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6424194 | Hairapetian | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6700413 | Chou | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6972597 | Kim | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6977526 | Li | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7098697 | Kucharski et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7126382 | Keil | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7250790 | Guiraud | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7425844 | Chung et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7474126 | Payne | Jan 2009 | B2 |
20020084806 | Yang | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030214327 | Huang et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040051563 | Zhang | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040085089 | Yin | May 2004 | A1 |
20040100307 | Wong et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040183569 | Choe | Sep 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4030631 | Apr 1992 | DE |
WO 2005076478 | Aug 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070285119 A1 | Dec 2007 | US |