1. The Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to methods that employ endodontic instruments in preparing a root canal of a tooth for receiving a sealer and/or filler material. More particularly, the invention relates to methods and systems for cleaning a root canal of a tooth with an endodontic file comprising a super-elastic nickel-titanium (“NiTi”) alloy with application of ultrasonic energy.
2. The Relevant Technology
When a root canal of a living tooth becomes infected or abscessed, discomfort and, in many cases, severe pain can result. In the early days of dentistry the only solution was to extract the tooth. More recently, however, dental practitioners have developed procedures for successfully removing the pulp material that includes the nerve of the tooth, which has become necrotic and/or infected. After careful preparation of the root canal that contains the nerve material, the canal is refilled with an inert filling material, such as gutta percha. This process allows the patient to retain the tooth.
To achieve a successful root canal restoration, the dental practitioner must carefully and, as completely as possible, remove the infected pulp material. The removal process typically includes shaping the root canal so that it can be effectively and successfully filled and sealed with an inert material to reduce the possibility of further infection.
Cleaning and shaping the root canal in preparation for receiving a sealing and/or filling material is achieved by the use of metal endodontic instruments that include cutting surfaces for removing tissue in the root canal. Since root canals are seldom straight, often having bends and twists, at least some endodontic instruments are flexible so as to allow the instrument to follow the curvature of the root canal. Currently preferred materials of construction include stainless steel and super-elastic NiTi alloys. Because of their excellent flexibility, NiTi files are often preferred in cleaning portions of the root canal exhibiting a high degree of curvature and tortuosity.
Another development relates to the application of ultrasonic energy to a stainless steel endodontic file while cleaning the root canal. While it has been possible to employ stainless steel files with ultrasonic powered handpieces, the use of super-elastic NiTi endodontic files with ultrasound has not been possible, as the super-elastic NiTi files will quickly break (i.e., within a few seconds) when subjected to ultrasonic energy. Failure of any type of endodontic file within a root canal of a tooth, particularly where the broken distal end of the file is engaged within root canal tissue, can be disastrous or catastrophic, resulting in a broken instrument fragment that can become tightly lodged within the root canal. Broken instrument fragment removal is very difficult, and sometimes impossible without loss of the tooth.
It would be an improvement in the art to provide methods and systems that allow combined use of ultrasonic treatment with super-elastic NiTi endodontic files in cleaning a root canal, while minimizing risk of file breakage within the root canal. Such methods and systems would allow ultrasonic endodontic cleaning with not only stainless steel files, which are significantly stiffer than super-elastic NiTi files, but would provide the benefits of ultrasonic endodontic treatment in cleaning portions of root canals that are heavily curved.
According to one aspect, the present invention is directed to method for cleaning a root canal of a tooth that employ both a NiTi super-elastic endodontic file and application of ultrasonic energy in a manner that surprisingly does not result in breakage of the NiTi super-elastic endodontic file. Such a method may include inserting an endodontic file into a root canal of a tooth, the endodontic file including a working portion comprising a super-elastic NiTi alloy. The root canal is cleaned by moving the working portion of the endodontic file within the root canal so that the working portion of the file cuts or abrades tissue within the root canal. Ultrasonic energy is applied to the endodontic file, the tooth, or both in order to assist in breaking up and removing necrotic tissue in the root canal of the tooth. Application of ultrasonic energy to the NiTi file in the manner disclosed herein does not result in breakage of the endodontic file for a period of at least 3 minutes.
Another aspect involves a method for cleaning a root canal of a tooth comprising coupling an endodontic file with a chuck of an ultrasonic powered handpiece assembly so that an exposed portion of the endodontic file extends at least 22 mm beyond the chuck. The endodontic file includes a working portion comprising a super-elastic NiTi alloy. At least a portion of the exposed portion of the endodontic file is inserted into a root canal of a tooth, and the root canal is cleaned by moving the working portion of the endodontic file within the root canal so that the working portion of the endodontic file cuts or abrades tissue within the root canal. Ultrasonic energy is applied to the endodontic file in order to assist in breaking up and removing necrotic tissue in the root canal of the tooth, and application of the ultrasonic energy does not result in breakage of the endodontic file for at least 3 minutes.
The inventor has unexpectedly found that when a NiTi endodontic file is coupled into an ultrasonic powered handpiece, and the file is coupled in a manner that provides at least 22 mm of exposed length, the NiTi file does not quickly break upon application of ultrasonic energy as normally occurs when applying ultrasonic energy to a NiTi file. Without wishing to be bound by any particular theory, it is postulated that lengths shorter than 22 mm allow the natural resonance frequency of the NiTi file to be more quickly and efficiently excited, resulting in formation of harmonic waves that quickly cause breakage of the file. It is postulated that where the exposed length of the NiTi file is maintained to be at least 22 mm, excitation of the natural resonance frequency of the NiTi file is limited or otherwise impaired, allowing the super-elastic file to be used with an ultrasonic powered handpiece without immediate breakage. Such a result is surprising and unexpected, as although stainless steel files can be routinely used with ultrasonic powered handpieces, up to now it has been impossible to employ a super-elastic endodontic file in an ultrasonic powered handpiece without almost immediate in-canal breakage, as the file quickly shatters or otherwise breaks as a result of application of the ultrasonic energy.
Another aspect of the present invention is directed to a system for use in a method for cleaning a root canal of a tooth while employing a super-elastic NiTi endodontic file and an ultrasonic powered handpiece, while preventing breakage of the NiTi file for a sufficiently long period (e.g., 3 minutes) to allow its use. Such a system includes a connector for use with an ultrasonic powered handpiece, the connector including a chuck at a distal end for coupling an endodontic file into the connector. The system also includes at least one endodontic file including a working portion comprising a super-elastic nickel-titanium alloy, the endodontic file being coupleable into the chuck of the connector so that an exposed portion of the endodontic file extending beyond the chuck is at least 22 mm in length when the file is coupled with the chuck.
Application of ultrasound energy to an endodontic file as disclosed herein can also “activate” debriding and cleaning agents. Cleaning and debriding agents work better when they are agitated because “fresh” or “non-reacted” material is caused to more intimately interact with the endodontic surfaces being treated. Such activation occurs when using NiTi endodontic files and also occurs when using other endodontic files, such as stainless steel files. Ultrasonic vibration of endodontic files can facilitate penetration of chemical agents into spaces, crevices and pores within a root canal.
These and other benefits, advantages and features of the present invention will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims, or may be learned by the practice of the invention as set forth hereinafter.
To further clarify the above and other advantages and features of the present invention, a more particular description of the invention will be rendered by references to specific embodiments thereof, which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is appreciated that these drawings depict only typical embodiments of the invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope. The invention will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings in which:
The invention generally relates to methods and related systems for cleaning and shaping a root canal of a tooth employing a super-elastic NiTi endodontic file while applying ultrasonic energy during the cleaning procedure. Examples method include inserting an endodontic file into a root canal of a tooth in which the file includes a working portion comprising a super-elastic NiTi alloy. The root canal is cleaned by moving the working portion of the file within the root canal so that the working portion of the file cuts or abrades tissue within the root canal. Ultrasonic energy is applied to the file, tooth, or both in order to assist in breaking up and removing necrotic tissue in the root canal during cleaning. The ultrasonic energy is applied in a manner that does not result in breakage of the file for a period of at least 3 minutes. Related systems include apparatus for performing the inventive methods.
The “coronal phase” typically involves exposing pulp chamber 32. This can be achieved, for example, through the use of a dental burr. Once access to pulp chamber 32 has been achieved, pulp material within chamber 32 may be removed.
After the operative coronal portion 38 has been adequately prepared, an X ray image of the tooth may be taken to identify the length of the root canal 34 to better identify the preferred working length for one or more endodontic instruments used in cleaning middle portion 40 and apical portion 42. According to one embodiment, a single file is having a length that can reach the apex can be used to clean both middle portion 40 and apical portion 42, whether starting with the middle portion 40 first and then cleaning the apical portion 42, or starting in the apical portion 42.
After identifying the root canal length, the practitioner may select an endodontic file instrument or a set of endodontic file instruments with a file length corresponding to the length of middle portion 40 or both middle portion 40 and apical portion 42. The length of each file used to clean middle portion 40 and apical portion 42 depends on the tooth being cleaned, but is generally in a range from about 20 mm to about 35 mm. During cleaning of middle portion 40, the selected endodontic file may be inserted into root canal 34 down through operative middle portion 40 without extending substantially into apical portion 42. Once substantially all pulp material is removed from operative middle portion 40, the same or different file can be used to clean apical portion 42. For example, a specially configured apical file may be used for removing the pulp within apical portion 42 when a single file used to clean both portions is not used.
Apical files may typically be formed of a super-elastic NiTi alloy so that they may more easily follow the anatomical contour of root canal 34. As described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,980,853, herein incorporated by reference in its entirety, such apical files may also include a cutting portion adjacent the distal end of the file that is limited in length so that it does not extend proximally upward the entire length of the shaft of the endodontic file, but is limited in length so as to not abrade or cut tissue which it may contact in the proximally located middle and coronal portions during cleaning of the apical portion. While described in the context of techniques by which the middle portion is cleaned separately from the apical portion, it will be understood that other techniques are also possible, e.g., one may clean middle and apical portions 40, 42 at the same time using one or more files.
Middle portion 40, and particularly apical portion 42, of root canal 34 may include portions which deviate substantially from a straight contour. Within such highly curved portions of the root canal 34, it can be difficult to clean root canal 34 in a manner that closely follows the anatomical curvature of the root. Stainless steel and NiTi are materials typically employed in file manufacture. Stainless steel files generally exhibit greater stiffness and strength as compared to NiTi files, which are substantially more flexible due to super-elastic characteristics of the NiTi alloy from which they are formed.
When attempting to clean such a highly curved portion of a root canal, there is a risk that ledging will occur. Ledging occurs when the tip of an endodontic file does not have sufficient flexibility to follow the anatomical contour of a root canal as it encounters a curve. Rather, the tip bores into the sidewall of the root canal, forming a ledge in the sidewall, which can be highly undesirable. Because of the relatively greater flexibility of NiTi endodontic files, such files are generally preferred in cleaning highly curved portions of the root canal, as they are generally less prone to ledging compared to stainless steel files.
Endodontic files are provided in configurations for manual manipulation, as well as for coupling with a chuck of a powered dental handpiece, for automated manipulation. For example, manually manipulated endodontic files may include an enlarged grippable handle at a proximal end for gripping within the practitioner's hand during cleaning. An endodontic file configured for coupling into a powered handpiece may include any of various keyed structures adjacent a proximal end, or may simply include a generally straight proximal shaft that is received into a chuck of a powered handpiece assembly.
An advantage associated with at least some powered handpieces is their ability to provide ultrasonic energy to the endodontic file. As described above, current practice limits application of ultrasound energy to stainless steel files, but does not permit combining application of ultrasound energy with the use of NiTi files, as NiTi files quickly break upon exposure to ultrasonic energy. As described above, failure of a file within a root canal can be catastrophic, as it can be difficult, if not impossible, to retrieve the broken file fragments. Thus, while the benefits of ultrasonic energy are available when cleaning root canals using a stainless steel file, any attempt to employ a NiTi with ultrasound is too risky and cannot be employed.
Moreover, because of the risk of ledging, stiffer stainless steel files are best suited for cleaning straighter portions of root canals. Use of stainless steel files in a curved root canal portion comes with increased risk of ledging. Ultrasound energy can exacerbate ledging. When attempting to navigate a highly curved root canal portion with a stainless steel file while applying ultrasonic energy, more ledging actually occurs (or the tendency to ledge is increased) than without application of ultrasonic energy. Because up to now it has not been possible to employ Ni—Ti endodontic files with ultrasonic energy without fear of immediate catastrophic in-canal breakage, standard practice dictates that, when cleaning the more curved portions of root canals using NiTi files, the procedure cannot be performed while applying ultrasound energy due to the extremely high risk of breakage. This is unfortunate because applying ultrasound energy could be very beneficial when cleaning curved root canals.
Unexpectedly, the inventor has found a method by which ultrasonic energy may be applied to a NiTi endodontic file while delaying or preventing breakage of the NiTi file so that it may be used in an endodontic procedure without fear of the file breaking during the procedure. The combined use of ultrasonic energy and NiTi files may be employed when cleaning any portion of the root canal, although it will be apparent that its use may be particularly advantageous within highly curved root canal portions, which may more typically be present in the middle portion and especially the apical portion of the root canal.
As shown in
Referring to
In an embodiment, exposed portion 52 of the NiTi file is at least 22 mm in length, at least 23 mm in length, at least 24 mm in length, or at least 25 mm in length. As a non-limiting example, a total length of the NiTi file 50 may be at least 28 mm, at least 29 mm, at least 30 mm in length, at least 31 mm in length, or at least 32 mm in length. It is theorized that fatigue-induced failure of the NiTi file 50 occurs as a result of resonance effects caused by application of the ultrasonic energy, such that the ultrasonic energy excites the natural resonance frequency of the NiTi file, creating standing waves and resulting in much faster breakage than what occurs in stainless steel files. Such failure is believed to result from propagation of a fatigue-induced crack originating at defects in the NiTi material (e.g., inclusions, micro-fissures, etc.).
A typical NiTi file 50 may have a composition including from about 52 to about 60 (e.g., about 57) weight percent nickel and about 40 to about 48 (e.g., about 41) weight percent titanium. Other components may be included in some nickel-titanium super-elastic alloys e.g., the nickel-titanium alloy may be a nickel-titanium-chromium alloy, a nickel-titanium-copper alloy, or a nickel-titanium-niobium alloy. Any other super-elastic alloys may also be suitable for use in methods according to the present invention (e.g., even those that may not be based on nickel-titanium). Such super-elastic alloys may be cold worked to increase their stiffness. In some embodiments, the degree of cold working may retard or block super elastic behavior, strictly speaking (i.e., they may exhibit cold- work induced pseudo-elastic behavior rather than strict super-elastic behavior). Nevertheless, such cold-worked alloys are within the scope of the present invention and meaning of the term “super-elastic nickel-titanium alloys”, as employed herein.
The applied ultrasound energy may have a frequency that closely matches the natural resonance frequency of the NiTi material from which the endodontic file is formed. The applied ultrasonic energy may typically have a frequency in a range of about 25 kHz to about 35 kHz (e.g., about 28 kHz to about 30 kHz). The natural resonance frequency of typical NiTi alloys from which endodontic files are formed is believed to be about 27 kHz. It is believed that by increasing the exposed length 52 of file 50 (i.e., that portion that extends beyond the coupling chuck), the resonance effects are sufficiently reduced or otherwise retarded to increase the exposure time required to result in file breakage. In any case, the inventor has observed that longer exposed portion file lengths, particularly exposed portion lengths of at least 22 mm, exhibit significantly reduced file breakage as compared to shorter file lengths.
Illustrated connector 150 further comprises a central portion 156 between threaded male insert 154 or other coupling means and chuck 152. Central portion 156 may include an elbow bend 158 defining a proximal central portion 156a and a distal central portion 156b. The longitudinal axes of proximal central portion 156a and the coupling means at the proximal end (e.g., threaded male insert 154) may be substantially aligned with one another, while a longitudinal axis of distal central portion 156b may be angled to be substantially perpendicular relative to the longitudinal axis of chuck 152 and the NiTi endodontic file.
In addition to being affected by the length of the exposed portion of file 50, it is also believed that the angle provided between the longitudinal axis of the chuck (and file 50 received therein) and the distal central portion 156b of the connector (i.e., where the central portion intersects the chuck) may also have an effect on how quickly ultrasound energy induced failure of the NiTi endodontic file 50 occurs. In the illustrated configuration, this angle is perpendicular, or about 90°. In several embodiments, this angle may be within about 25° of perpendicular, within about 20° of perpendicular, within about 10° of perpendicular, within about 5° of perpendicular, or within about 3° of perpendicular.
The presence of elbow bend 158 within central portion 156 provides an angle between the coupling means (e.g., threaded male insert 154) and the NiTi endodontic file 50 that is different than the angle between file 50 and distal central portion 156b, as described above. For example, while the angle between distal central portion 156b and the Ni—Ti endodontic file 50 may be 90°, the angle between the Ni—Ti endodontic file 50 and the coupling means (e.g., threaded male insert 154) (and thus the ultrasonic powered handpiece) may be greater than 90° (e.g., about 110° , 115° , or 120°). In other words, in several embodiments, elbow bend 158 may provide an angle between proximal central portion 156a and distal central portion 156b that is from about 1° to about 45°, 5° to about 40°, or 10° to about 20°. Such an elbow bend 158 may assist the practitioner in providing a more ergonomic angle between the ultrasonic powered handpiece 54 gripped within the practitioner's hand and the NiTi endodontic file 50 inserted into the root canal 34 of the tooth 30, while providing an optimal angle between the NiTi endodontic file 50 and the distal portion 156b adjacent chuck 152, which may act to further lengthen the period of time available to the practitioner before the NiTi file 50 breaks.
Connector 150 advantageously includes means for adjusting the exposed portion length 52 of an inserted NiTi endodontic file 50. For example, coupling knob 160 may serve to open and close a chuck coupling mechanism within chuck 152, so that one may insert the NiTi endodontic file 50 to a deeper or more shallow degree within chuck 152, and then tighten knob 160 once a desired exposed portion length 52 of the NiTi file 50 is provided. Thus, for somewhat longer files (e.g., 27 mm or 30 mm files), the practitioner may seat the file more deeply within chuck 152 than for a relatively shorter file (e.g., 23 mm or 25 mm) For example, in order for a 25 mm file to provide an exposed portion of at least 22 mm, no more than 3 mm of the proximal end of the file shaft should be received within chuck 152. With a 30 mm file, as much as 8 mm of the proximal end of the file shaft could be received within chuck 152, while still providing at least 22 mm of exposed length. Of course, more than 22 mm may be exposed to provide even longer ultrasound working times before the NiTi file 50 would need to be removed.
The inventor has found that NiTi file 50 may be consistently employed with ultrasound for 3 1-minute cycles or more, 5 1-minute cycles or more, 8 1-minute cycles or more, or 10 1-minute cycles or more, without breakage occurring. 10 or more cycles may be possible with a 30 mm file (e.g., a 30-02 file). One may employ cycle times having a duration as desired. For example, one may employ a cycle time from about 30 seconds to about 2 minutes (e.g., 1 minute). One may desire to remove the NiTi file 50 in between cycles (e.g., to irrigate the canal to aid in debris removal, etc.). One may perform several cycles (e.g., 3 cycles, 5 cycles, 8 cycles, 10 cycles, 3-10 cycles, 3-8 cycles, etc.) to complete cleaning one or more particular portions of the root canal. The total working time during which ultrasonic energy is applied to the NiTi file may be monitored by the practitioner (or by the powered handpiece 54) to ensure that the file is removed and discarded before failure occurs. For example, one NiTi file may provide sufficient working time before failure when used in accordance with the presently described inventive methods. In another embodiment, one may elect to remove and discard the file after a certain period of use (e.g., after 3 minutes of cumulative use, 5 minutes of cumulative use, 8 minutes of cumulative use, or 10 minutes of cumulative use) and replace the NiTi file with a new file. “Time of use” as described above may refer to the time the file is exposed to ultrasonic energy, not counting any rest periods in between cycles.
In several embodiments, the NiTi endodontic files employed with the present methods may have an actual shaft length (e.g., typically measured from any enlarged head for coupling within chuck 152) that is at least 23 mm or at least 25 mm (e.g., 25 mm to 30 mm) The inventor has found that while NiTi endodontic files are available in shorter lengths (e.g., 15 and 20 mm), such files are too short, and break easily and quickly upon exposure to ultrasonic energy. Files that are at least somewhat longer provide sufficient length to allow them to be coupled into a chuck in a manner so that at least 22 mm of length is exposed, significantly lengthening the time provided before ultrasound induced failure occurs. Typical files may include a taper of 2% (e.g., −02 in the typical naming convention). Other tapers (or no taper) may alternative be provided.
The diameter of the NiTi endodontic file may also have an effect on achievable ultrasonic working time before failure occurs. For example, a larger diameter file may better resist breakage than a smaller diameter file. Where the diameter is sufficiently large, lower exposed lengths may be provided (e.g., between about 22 mm and about 23 mm, perhaps even less than 22 mm), while still providing sufficient working time (e.g., at least 3 minutes) to allow the practitioner to complete the desired procedure.
Exemplary NiTi files employed in the present methods may include, but are not limited to those having diameters of 0.08 mm, 0.1 mm, 0.15 mm, 0.2 mm, 0.25 mm, 0.3 mm, 0.35 mm, 0.4 mm, 0.45 mm, 0.5 mm, 0.55 mm, 0.6 mm, 0.7 mm, and 0.8 mm. Preferably, the diameter of the NiTi files may be greater than or equal to 0.25 mm. The files may have lengths of more than 20 mm, such as 23 mm, 25 mm, 27 mm, and 30 mm.
Any of various ultrasonic generators available for use with stainless steel files may be used. For example, a suitable ultrasonic generator is ENAC, available from Osada.
Another ultrasonic generator that may be employed is TIGON, available from W&H Dentalwerks. A connector similar to that shown in
Application of ultrasound energy to endodontic files can also “activate” debriding and cleaning agents. Cleaning and debriding agents work better when they are agitated because “fresh” or “non-reacted” material is caused to more intimately interact with the endodontic surfaces being treated. Ultrasonic vibration of both NiTi endodontic files and endodontic files made of other materials, such as stainless steel, can facilitate penetration of chemical agents into spaces, crevices and pores within a root canal.
While
Because such an instrument does not include flutes or other cutting surfaces, it may exhibit less surface area as compared to a similarly sized instrument having cutting surfaces. Such a decreased surface area may limit surface exposure of inclusions or other imperfections within the NiTi material, making the instrument less likely to break. In other words, such an instrument may exhibit a lower density of surface imperfections that might serve to initiate and/or propagate breakage of the instrument. For purposes of simplicity, the term “endodontic file” as used herein is to be broadly construed to include such smooth instruments, as well as those including cutting edges or surfaces.
It will be appreciated that the powered handpieces 54 may move the endodontic files in any suitable mode (e.g., rotation, reciprocating rotational movement, etc.). Alternatively, the only movement of the file provided by the powered handpiece may be the high frequency vibration provided by the ultrasonic energy. Where desired, the practitioner may manually provide additional movement (e.g., up and down, rotational, reciprocating rotation, etc.) to the file within the root canal during use. Thus, there may be multiple sources of file movement applied during use.
A working example similar to that shown in
The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US14/28406 | 3/14/2014 | WO | 00 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61790726 | Mar 2013 | US |