The present invention relates generally to a communication connector, and more particularly to a communication jack.
In an electrical communication system, it is sometimes advantageous to transmit data in the form of differential signals over a pair of conductive paths (i.e., a conductive path pair) rather than a single conductive path, where the transmitted signal comprises the voltage difference between the conductive paths without regard to the absolute voltages present. Each conductive path in a conductive path pair is capable of picking up electrical noise from outside sources, e.g., neighboring data lines, or other sources. Differential signals may be advantageous to use due to the fact that the signals are less susceptible to these outside sources.
A concern with differential signals is electrical noise that is caused by neighboring differential conductive path pairs, where the individual conductors on each conductive path pair couple (inductively or capacitively) in an unequal manner that results in added noise to the neighboring conductive path pair. This is referred to as crosstalk.
The ability of a data connector to support higher bandwidths depends, at least in part, on the amount of crosstalk that it adds to the system. Ideally, the connector should be transparent to the system, meaning it should not add any crosstalk to the system. For systems using RJ45 style connectors, as are known in the art, crosstalk is inherent to the conductor pair layout. For this type of connector, crosstalk reduction and suppression become critical. Some of the crosstalk reduction efforts focus on isolation, minimizing capacitive and inductive imbalances, and reducing the overall path length of conductors within the connector.
RJ45 connector parameters are defined by the ANSI/TIA-568-C.2 standard, and noise suppression typically takes place inside the communication jack 4 of the connector 2. The effectiveness of the suppression depends in part on (i) the distance from the plug contacts 12 on the communication plug 6 and the PICs 10 on the communication jack 4 to the compensation elements in the communication jack 4, and (ii) inductive and capacitive balance.
For interoperability and long term reliability, the communication jack 4 is also required to meet stringent physical and mechanical requirements, such as certain contact angles, normal force, and insertion cycles relative to the PICs 10 on the communication jack 4. Crosstalk suppression favors a shorter contact length, yet the mechanical requirements often require longer contacts than can be readily used for crosstalk suppression. In most cases, the length required to meet the mechanical requirements is a limiting factor. Hence, it becomes beneficial for higher bandwidth connectors to have PICs that meet mechanical requirements while remaining short enough to enable effective crosstalk suppression.
An exploded perspective illustration of one type of communication jack 4 is depicted in
The nose 16 may also include a flexible PCB 26 that provides crosstalk compensation when the flexible PCB 26 is in contact with the PICs 28. As shown, the flexible PCB 26 wraps around the same mandrel 34 as the PICs 28, and includes conductive traces on at least one side and/or layer that facilitate electrical contact with the PICs 28.
The interaction of the communication jack 4 and communication plug 6 may be seen in
However, while the communication jack of
Thus, manufacture of the circuit board components for communication jack 4 requires two different manufacturing processes for the flexible PCB 26 and the rigid PCB 18. In some cases, these processes can have etching tolerances at opposite ends of the tolerance spectrum. Such mismatch along the tolerance spectrum results in a mismatch in the balancing capacitors located on the flexible PCB 26 and the rigid PCB 18. The unbalanced capacitors will fail to cancel the crosstalk effectively and will yield a connector with poor performance. The limitations and complexity of the manufacture of the communication jack 4 may additionally require that the section of the PICs 28 from the sled mandrel 34 to the rigid PCB 18 be routed in a particular way that may add to coupling within the connector as well as between adjacent connectors. In order to reduce coupled crosstalk between the connectors, spacing must be increased between the connectors, or foil wrap must be added around the connector. The increased spacing reduces the number of connectors in a given space and addition of the foil increases the connector cost.
The present invention comprises, in at least one embodiment thereof, a communication jack which includes a housing with an aperture for receiving a communication plug, and a circuit board at least partially within the housing. The circuit board includes crosstalk compensation elements. A plurality of plug interface contacts are connected to the circuit board. At least one of the plurality of plug interface contacts includes a contact element layered with at least one spring element.
The present invention comprises, in another embodiment thereof, a communication system including electrical equipment connected to at least one communication jack. The jack includes a housing with an aperture for receiving a communication plug, and a circuit board at least partially within the housing. The circuit board includes crosstalk compensation elements. A plurality of plug interface contacts are connected to the circuit board. At least one of the plurality of plug interface contacts includes a contact element layered with at least one spring element.
The present invention comprises, in another embodiment thereof, a communication jack for compensating a source of crosstalk in a mated communication plug over a range of signal operating frequencies. The jack includes a plurality of plug interface contacts (PICs), where each PIC comprises a spring element, a contact element pivotally connected to the spring element, and an electrically insulating element, wherein the electrically insulating element connects the contact element to the spring element.
The present invention comprises, in another embodiment thereof, a communication system which includes an electrical equipment and a communication jack connected to the electrical equipment. The jack includes a plurality of plug interface contacts (PICs), where each PIC comprises a spring element, a contact element pivotally connected to the spring element, and an electrically insulating element, wherein the electrically insulating element connects the contact element to the spring element.
The present invention comprises, in another embodiment thereof, a communication jack for compensating a source of crosstalk in a mated communication plug over a range of signal operating frequencies, which includes a plurality of plug interface contacts (PICs). Each PIC has a spring element, an electrically insulating element, and a contact element. The contact element has a free end and a spring end, and the electrically insulating element is connected between the spring element and the spring end of the contact element.
The present invention comprises, in another embodiment thereof, a communication system which includes an electrical equipment and a communication jack connected to the electrical equipment. The jack includes a plurality of plug interface contacts (PICs). Each PIC has a spring element, an electrically insulating element, and a contact element. The contact element has a free end and a spring end, and the electrically insulating element is connected between the spring element and the spring end of the contact element.
The present invention comprises, in another embodiment thereof, a method of manufacturing a communication jack for compensating a source of crosstalk in a mated communication plug over a range of signal operating frequencies. The method Includes the steps of providing a printed circuit board comprising one or more crosstalk compensation circuits; and contacting a plug interface contact (PIC) to a contact on the printed circuit board, wherein the PIC comprises: a spring element, a contact element pivotally connected to the spring element, and an electrically insulating element, wherein the electrically insulating element connects the contact element to the spring element.
The present invention comprises, in another embodiment thereof, a communication jack, which includes at least one printed circuit board having a plurality of conductors arranged in respective signal pairs, wherein the at least one printed circuit board is subjected to a manufacturing variation. A first stage of at least one first capacitor is connected between one of the plurality of conductors for a first signal pair of the signal pairs and another of the plurality of conductors for a second signal pair of the signal pairs. A second stage includes at least one second capacitor of an opposite polarity of the first capacitor(s), where the second capacitor(s) is/are connected between the first signal pair and the second signal pair. At least one second capacitor includes a geometry that is chosen such that a net capacitance of the first stage and the second stage is minimized in the presence of the manufacturing variation.
The present invention comprises, in another embodiment thereof, a method of designing a communication jack. The method comprises the steps of: providing a circuit board at least partially within a jack housing and having a first stage of capacitors and a second stage of capacitors for at least partially improving an electrical performance of the jack; optimizing the first stage of capacitors and the second stage of capacitors for the electrical performance; and compensating for the effect of a manufacturing variation of the circuit board to minimize the effect of the manufacturing variation on the electrical performance.
An advantage of at least one embodiment of the present invention is a communication jack with a shorter electrical length between the point of contact with mating plug contacts and the first compensation stage in the jack.
Another advantage of at least one embodiment of the present invention is a communication jack with shorter PIC lengths thereby reducing the jack susceptibility to crosstalk.
Yet another advantage of at least one embodiment of the present invention is a communication jack that has improved electrical performance and is relatively cost effective to manufacture.
Yet another advantage of at least one embodiment of the present invention is a communication jack that reduces the effect of manufacturing variation on electrical performance.
The above-mentioned and other features and advantages of this invention, and the manner of attaining them, will become more apparent and the invention will be better understood by reference to the following description of an embodiment of the invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views. The exemplification set out herein illustrates preferred embodiments of the invention, in one form, and such exemplification is not to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention in any manner.
An exploded perspective illustration of the communication jack 44 is shown in
As described above, PICs in the communication jack 44 have both an electrical function and a mechanical function. The PICs optimize electrical functionality through the design of the contact elements 46. The contact elements 46 have shorter lengths relative to the PICs of typical communication jacks as described above. The shorter lengths of the contact elements 46 result in reduced coupling between the contacts, as described above.
However, for the illustrated example, the PICs must also provide a requisite contact normal force of about 100 grams on the plug contacts in the window of movement. The contact normal force is necessary to have a low-resistance interface for the communication plug. The PICs have improved mechanical functionality through the design of the mechanical spring elements 64. The mechanical spring elements 64 provide the communication jack 44 the requisite contact normal force between the PICs and the contacts of the plug 12.
The tradeoff between the electrical and mechanical functionalities of the PICs is addressed through the use of the electrically insulating elements 62. The electrically insulating elements 62 connect the contact elements 46 to the mechanical spring elements 64. In this manner, the contact elements 46 are electrically insulated from the mechanical spring elements 64, meaning the mechanical spring elements 64 do not extend the electrical length of the PICs. Rather, only the contact elements 46 of the PICs operate as part of the electrical circuit in the communication jack 44. Thus, the communication jack 44 reduces crosstalk at the contacts while still providing the requisite contact normal force.
As mentioned above, the contact elements 46 of each PIC are connected to the mechanical spring elements 64 via the electrically insulating elements 62. In some embodiments, the contact elements may be pivotally connected to the mechanical spring elements 64. Thus, the spring elements 64 may be made of a conductive material but still will not extend the electrical length of the PIC. Alternatively, the spring elements 64 may be made of a non-conductive material such that the electrically insulating elements 62 may be omitted.
The contact elements 46 may be manufactured using non-spring materials. As the mechanical spring elements 64 are electrically isolated from the contact elements 46, the mechanical spring elements 64 may be made longer to withstand the displacement of the contact elements 46 over a range of plug-contact crimp heights, including four- and six-position plug insertion. As a result of the electrically insulating elements 62, such an increase in the length of the mechanical spring elements 64 does not increase the electrical length of the PIC as a whole. This electrical isolation further essentially eliminates inductive and capacitive coupling between the mechanical spring elements 64 themselves.
Referring to the more detailed view of
In some embodiments, there may be eight PICs in the communication jack, as shown. Each of the PICs is identical and is formed in the same manner as the rest. As such, fabrication may be simplified. For example, the PICs may be stamped on one strip at 0.04 inches centerline. The shorter length of the PICs reduces the requisite strip width, and thus, overall material costs.
The mechanical spring elements 64 are similar to one another. The mechanical spring elements 64 may be made from plastic resin or ferrous metal, or other metal, to help lower costs.
In the expanded view, a plug contact 12 of the entering communication plug 6 is shown making contact with a contact element 46 of a PIC in the communication Jack. The contact element 46 is connected to an electrically insulating element 62 of the PIC that is in turn connected to a spring element 64 of the PIC. The contact element 46 may be described as having a free end 74 and a spring end 76. The electrically insulating element 62 is then connected between the spring element 64 and the spring end 76 of the contact element 46.
As the communication plug 6 enters, the plug contact 12 contacts the contact element 46 and forces the free end 74 of contact element 46 to rotate downwards like a lever. The spring end 76 of the contact element 46 contacts the horizontal rigid PCB 60 and in turn lifts up the insulating element 62, forcing the mechanical spring element 64 to move upward. The spring element 64 resists the upward motion, resulting in a contact normal force on the plug contacts 12. Thus, the mechanical integrity of the communication jack is enabled through the use of spring element 64.
Further, it can be seen from the expanded view that the electrical length of the PIC includes only the length of the contact element 46. Thus, the electrical length can be understood as the distance 72 between the free end 74 of the contact element 46 and the spring end 76 of the contact element 46. In some embodiments, this distance may be around 0.115 inches, and more particularly can be less than 0.160 inches. As described above, this design of the communication jack allows for reducing a source of crosstalk in a mated communication plug over a range of signal operating frequencies.
The horizontal rigid PCB 60 is designed to have the same thickness and core construction of the vertical rigid PCB 50. In this manner, the rigid PCBs may be fabricated together and may have compensating capacitors that change in the same manner. This helps improve production yield and allows the use of rigid PCBs, which reduces cost as compared to the flexible PCBs as used in other solutions. The horizontal rigid PCB 60 is connected to the vertical rigid PCB via right angle contacts 68 (shown in
Compensation circuits used in embodiments of the present invention may contain capacitors whose size and shape are designed such that when they are subjected to variation in manufacturing from such sources as etching, the net effect on the electrical performance of the jack is minimized. The capacitors are labeled in the drawings according to the conductive traces to which they are connected. Thus, C46 is a capacitor between the 4th and 6th conductive trace.
As is known in the art of PCB manufacturing, the etching of a PCB starts with a substrate with copper cladding, then a coating of etch resist is applied. Using the PCB artwork, the desired PCB pattern is imaged and developed, the PCB is then placed into a chemical bath for a specified period of time where the unwanted copper cladding is etched away, and the etch resist is stripped away leaving the final PCB artwork. Variations in any part of the process can create variations in the compensation capacitors. Examples of variation can be variation of the chemical composition of the chemical bath as a function of position within the bath, or exposure time variation of the PCB panel within the chemical bath, or copper cladding thickness variation.
More specifically, for pair combination 45-36 (C35, C46, C34, C56) a design criteria referred to as scenario 2 is used; for pair combination 36-12 (C13, C16) the scenario 1 design criteria is used; for pair combination 45-12 (C25, C15) the scenario 1 design criteria is used; for pair combination 36-78 C68 is a square in a single first stage; for pair combination 45-78 both C58 and C47 are square in a single first stage; and for pair combination 12-78 no compensation is needed.
To understand these scenarios, one must first understand that in many CAT6 and CAT6A jacks, a two stage compensation scheme is typically used where the first stage uses a capacitor of opposite polarity to the incident crosstalk caused by the plug, and the second stage uses a capacitor of the same polarity as the incident crosstalk caused by the plug. The first stage capacitor is typically larger than the second stage capacitor. The formula for capacitance between two plates is generally understood by the equation
C=∈r∈0A/d, (1)
where C is the capacitance in farads (F), ∈r is the relative dielectric constant of the material between the plates (typically about 4.4 when using FR4), ∈0 is permittivity of free space (8.85*10−12 F/m), A is the area of overlap of the two plates in square meters, and d is the distance between the two plates in meters.
Thus, the net crosstalk on the jack used to cancel the crosstalk caused by the plug is approximately the difference between the two capacitors in the first and second stages (neglecting other parasitic crosstalk elements elsewhere in the jack, mutual inductive coupling, and the frequency dependency of the coupling). This can be written as
Cnet=Cstage1−Cstage2, (2)
where Cnet is the net capacitance. Cstage 1 is the capacitance in stage 1, and Cstage 2 is the capacitance in stage 2. Equation 1 shows that capacitance is proportional to area. Therefore, if one assumes that both capacitors are created on the same circuit board panel (thus the same etching, dielectric material, and separation),
Cnet˜Astage 1−Astage 2, (3)
which states that the net capacitance is proportional to the difference in the area of overlap of the plate capacitors comprising stage 1 and stage 2 (Astage 1 and Astage 2, respectively).
Since the capacitors for stage 1 and stage 2 are made on the same panel, any over-etching or under-etching is assumed to affect both capacitors equally. Therefore, the change in net capacitance for a circuit board that is over-etched or under-etched is given by
ΔCnet˜ΔAstage 1−ΔAstage 2, (4)
where ΔCnet refers to the change in net capacitance, and ΔAstage 1 and ΔAstage 2 both refer to the change in area for stage 1 and stage 2, respectively. By selectively choosing the dimensions of the capacitors comprising stage 1 and stage 2, the overall ΔCnet can be minimized for different types of etching variation.
Four Scenarios
In general, there are four scenarios that must be examined. For reference, a jack using 2 stages of compensation can have a variety of methods of doing this compensation. Assuming all compensating crosstalk (of opposite polarity of the incident crosstalk caused by the plug) is located in stage 1, and all intentional crosstalk (of the same polarity as the incident crosstalk caused by the plug) is located in stage 2, there are four unique scenarios that should be examined because for a given pair combination, there are four coupling mechanisms. For example, pair combination 45-36 can have coupling between 3-4 and 5-6 (crosstalk) and coupling between 4-6 and 3-5 (compensating crosstalk). The four scenarios come from the fact that stage 1 can have 1 or 2 compensating elements, and stage 2 can have 1 or 2 compensating elements (resulting in four combinations).
For all scenarios addressed below, it is assumed that all capacitors are built with the same core thickness and, the same dielectric material, and are subject to the same over-etching or under-etching during PCB manufacturing. This assumption is reasonable if the capacitors are physically located near each other during PCB manufacturing (within a few inches). Additionally, these results assume no edge effects or other variations to the capacitance (i.e., equation 1 holds). These results can easily be slightly modified to account for the change in capacitance caused by capacitor edge effects, and/or other effects caused by distributed electrical parameters.
Scenario 1: 1 Capacitor in Stage 1, and 1 Capacitor in Stage 2
For this scenario, there is 1 capacitor in stage 1 and 1 capacitor in stage 2. The stage 1 capacitor is larger than the stage 2 capacitor. Due to the fact the stage 1 capacitor is larger, its area will vary more than the stage 2 capacitor for the same etching variation. Therefore, to minimize the change in the stage 1 capacitor 53 (see
Therefore, since the effective areas of overlap (A (stage 1) and B (stage 2)) of these capacitors are known,
X*X=A, (5)
and
Y*Z=B. (6)
Since the net capacitance (proportional to net area, Anet) between them is also set by the designer,
Anet,scenario 1(ideal case)=A−B=X2−Y*Z. (7)
Additionally, if we want to minimize the effect of etching, we can try to achieve the same Anet with an over-etching or under-etching of E (E will be positive with under-etching and negative with over-etching). This leads to the equation
Anet,scenario 1(with etching error E)=(X+E)2−(Y+E)*(Z+E)=X2−Y*Z. (8)
Solving equations 5 with respect to X gives
X=√A. (9)
Substituting this value of X into equation 8 gives
(√A+E)2−(Y+E)(Z+E)=(√A)2−Y*Z, (10)
which can be expanded to
A+2*E*√A+E2−Y*Z−Z*E−Y*E−E2=A−Y*Z. (11)
Cancelling identical terms on both sides of equation 11 gives
2*E*√A−Z*E−Y*E=0. (12)
Dividing both sides of equation 12 by E yields
2*√A−Z−Y=0. (13)
Substituting Y=B/Z (from equation 6) into equation 13, multiplying both sides of equation 13 by −1, and rearranging the terms, yields
Z−2*A+B/Z=0. (14)
Multiplying both sides of equation 14 by Z gives
Z2−2*Z*√A+B=0. (15)
This is a quadratic equation which can be solved for Z as
Z=√A±√(A−B). (16)
Similarly solving equation 13 for Y gives
Y=√A∓T(A−B). (17)
Also, X=√A (from equation 5).
Note that depending on the sign used in equation 16, the opposite sign must be used in equation 17. Also note that in equations 9, 16, and 17 the etching factor, E, is no longer in these equations; consequently, for any change in etching, these equations hold true. Thus, the net capacitance will not change given any change in etching. Therefore, for a two-stage compensating scheme having a first stage compensating capacitor of area A=X2, a second stage of B=Y*Z (rectangle), with Anet, scenario 1 (with etching error E)=Anet, scenario 1 (ideal case), equations 9, 16, and 17 can be used to determine X, Y, and Z.
Scenario 2: 2 Capacitors in Stage 1, and 2 Capacitors in Stage 2
In this scenario there are two capacitors in stage 1, and 2 capacitors in stage 2. See
X*X=A, (18)
W*W=C, (19)
Y*Z=B, (20)
and
T*U=D. (21)
For this scenario, Anet is equal to
Anet,scenario 2=A+C−B−D. (22)
Since the net area needs to be the same before and after any etching effects E, substituting equations 18 to 21 into equation 22,
Anet,scenario 2(ideal case)=X2+W2−Y*Z−T*U, (23)
and
Anet,scenario 2(with etching error E)=(X+E)2+(W+E)2−(Y+E)(Z+E)−(T+E)*(U+E). (24)
Following a similar derivation as scenario 1, Y and Z can be solved for as
Y=A+√C−(T+U)/2±√(((T+U)/2−√A−√C)2−B), (25)
Z=√A+√C−(T+U)/2∓√(((T+U)/2−√A−√C)2−B), (26)
and
X=√A,W=√C,and T*U=D (from equations 18, 19, and 21).
Note that Y and Z can both be interchanged.
Thus, for given areas A, B, C, and D and given dimensions T and U, one can find a Y and Z that eliminate the effect of etching. Equations 25 and 26 are the most important and most universal equations for this as all other scenarios can be derived from these equations. Note that equations 16 and 17 can be derived from equations 25 and 26 by setting C, T, and U equal to zero.
Under the special case where areas A=C and B=D, one can use equations 16 and 17 derived in scenario 1.
Scenario 3: 2 Capacitors in Stage 1, and 1 Capacitor in Stage 2
In this scenario, one can use equations 25 and 26 but set T and U (and consequently D) equal to zero.
Scenario 4: 1 Capacitor in Stage 1, and 2 Capacitors in Stage 2
In this scenario, one can use equations 25 and 26 but set C (and consequently W) equal to zero.
Communication jack 78 includes, among other things, a housing 79 into which a communication plug 6 enters, a horizontal rigid PCB 84, and a vertical rigid PCB 82. A portion of communication jack 78 is expanded to illustrate the mechanical and electrical functionalities of the communication jack.
In the second embodiment, contact between the horizontal rigid PCB 84 and the PICs of the communication jack is made through a clip-on style contact 90. In this embodiment, when the plug contacts 12 press downward on the contact elements 88 of the PICs, the PICs rotate around a centerline contact radius 92. Operation is as described above, with the contact normal force resulting from the resistance of spring elements 94. The PCBs 82, 84 can have compensation the same as, or similar to, that previously described for PCBs 50, 60, respectively.
As described above, the contact elements 88 are respectively connected to the spring elements 94 via electrically insulating elements 96. In some embodiments, the electrically insulating element 96 may be omitted if the spring element 94 is made of or coated with an insulating material, such as insert-molded plastic or a powder coating.
In the foregoing descriptions, the communication jack has been described as an RJ45 communication jack, such as a CAT6 or CAT6A jack. However, the invention described here is not limited to such an application. It may be applied just as well in other types and/or configurations of jacks or couplers. Other examples are possible as well.
The present invention may be used in a communication system such as that depicted in
The communication cables 108 may be unshielded twisted pair (UTP) cables, and more particularly, Category 6A cables that can operate at 10 GB/s. However, the present invention may be equally applied to or implemented in a variety of communications cables. Examples of possible communications cables include shielded cables, unshielded cables, CAT5E, CAT6, CAT6A, CAT7, CAT7A and other twisted pair Ethernet cables, and others. This list is not meant to be limiting, as other types of cables are possible as well.
Some of the communication cables 108 may be terminated directly into the equipment 110, and others may be terminated into the communication jacks 106, communication plugs 6, or combinations thereof. The use of communication jacks 106 may eliminate the need for the foil labels 100, and may further improve ANEXT, as described above. Further, the communication cables 108 may be processed into looms, or bundles, of cables and may be processed into preterminated looms.
Communication cables 108 may be used in a variety of structured cabling applications such as patch cords, zone cords, backbone cabling, and horizontal cabling, though the present invention is not limited to such applications. In general, the present invention may be used in military, industrial, telecommunications, computer, data communications, and other cabling applications.
A method of manufacturing the communication jack described above is also contemplated. The method may include providing a PCB that includes one or more crosstalk compensation circuits, and contacting a PIC to a contact on the PCB. The PIC may, as described above, include a spring element, a contact element pivotally connected to the spring element, and an electrically insulating element that connects the contact element to the spring element. As in the above-described embodiments, the PCB may be a rigid PCB, and the contact on the PCB may contact the PIC at the interface of the contact element and the electrically insulating element
An exploded view of jack 138 can be seen in
Like the jack previously described, jack 138 uses two rigid circuit boards 50, 60, and a separate spring 156 (
Alternatively, front sled assembly 142 can be modified to eliminate breakaway insulating caps 160. It may be advantageous to use an alternative front sled assembly 172 as shown in
An exploded view of jack 238 is shown in
Jack 238 of
PICs 244 are not laminated PICs; instead they are free-body layered PICs. Each of the layers of fixed end 264 of PIC 244 (see
In addition to simplified assembly, electrical performance benefits can be achieved by using the layered PIC design of jack 238.
Referring now to
Because PICs 332 are inserted into bottom side 336 of PCB 60A, the width of PICs 332 must be less than the diameter of holes 344. Therefore, to increase the width of PICs 332, holes 344 must also increase in diameter. Increasing PIC 332 width is mechanically and electrically advantageous as it increases PIC 332 stiffness, makes assembly handling easier, and provides lower electrical resistance. As the hole diameter increases, the edges of adjacent holes get closer in proximity unless holes 344 are staggered as shown in
Alternative embodiments of features 342 may include compliant shape made using shearing, forming, or coining operations individually or combined.
Other embodiments of the present invention can include PCB 60A and PCB 50A (see
The schematic for rigid PCB 60A is shown in
The schematic for the rigid PCB 50A is shown in
An additional embodiment is to have the same stack-up type for the rigid PCB 60A and rigid PCB 50A (4-layer and 2-layer, respectively), but with a different overall thickness (different than 0.062″). Another embodiment includes a rigid PCB 60A with a different thickness than the overall thickness for rigid PCB 50A. Another embodiment includes a 4-layer stack-up for rigid PCB 50A. The 4-layer stack-up can be from the top table in
Any of the embodiments of PCBs 50A and 60A can replace the PCBs 50 and 60, respectively.
While this invention has been described as having a preferred design, the present invention can be further modified within the spirit and scope of this disclosure. This application is therefore intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the invention using its general principles. Further, this application is intended to cover such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice in the art to which this invention pertains and which fall within the limits of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/425,130, filed Mar. 20, 2012, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/466,201, filed Mar. 22, 2011, the entire disclosure of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2476886 | Miller et al. | Jul 1949 | A |
3949180 | Ojima et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
4080027 | Benasutti | Mar 1978 | A |
4274691 | Abernethy et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4662702 | Furuya | May 1987 | A |
5163835 | Morlion et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5224884 | Singer et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5230632 | Baumberger et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5240420 | Roberts | Aug 1993 | A |
5716237 | Conorich et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5788515 | Mitra et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
6010367 | Wu | Jan 2000 | A |
6089923 | Phommachanh | Jul 2000 | A |
6106335 | Merchant et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6176742 | Arnett et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6360437 | Fukumoto et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6530810 | Goodrich et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6767257 | Arnett et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6786776 | Itano et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
7125288 | Schilling | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7294025 | Chen | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7367849 | Wang et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
RE41699 | Itano et al. | Sep 2010 | E |
7824231 | Marti et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8425255 | Erickson et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8641452 | Patel et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
20120052734 | Fukuda et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0645843 | Mar 1995 | EP |
2008060272 | May 2008 | WO |
2008076813 | Jun 2008 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140148057 A1 | May 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61466201 | Mar 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13425130 | Mar 2012 | US |
Child | 14170988 | US |