Communication interface and testing method therefore

Abstract

A method for testing a bidirectional communication interface comprising a transmitter (8) and a receiver (7) connected to a some transmission line (4) comprises the steps of a) repeatedly emitting (S3, S7, S14) a test signal in a first frequency range by the transmitter (8), each of said emitted test signals being associated to a reference time mark,b) receiving response signals (S4, S8) in a second frequency range associated to said test signals at the receiver (7) such that the reference time marks of their associated test signals are synchronized, yielding a superimposed response signal,c) based on the superimposed response signal, judging (S11, S18) the interface to be in order or not in order.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Further features and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the subsequent description of embodiments thereof referring to the drawings.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a telecommunication network in which the invention is applicable;

FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a network side modem, a subscriber's modem and a subscriber line connecting the two; and

FIG. 3 is a flowchart of a test method executed by the network side modem of FIG. 2.

Claims

1. A method for testing a bidirectional communication interface comprising a transmitter and a receiver connected to a same transmission line, wherein a) a test signal in a first frequency range is repeatedly emitted by the transmitter, each of said emitted test signals being associated to a reference time mark,b) response signals in a second frequency range associated to said test signals are received at the receiver such that the reference time marks of their associated test signals are synchronized, yielding a superimposed response signal,c) based on the superimposed response signal, the interface is judged to be in order or not in order.And whereinin a first phase of step a) the transmitter is amplitude controlled to emit the test signal in a first frequency range at a first amplitude, and in a first phase of step b) a first amplitude of the response signal received at the same time at the receiver is detected,in a second phase of step a) the transmitter is amplitude controlled to emit the test signal at a second amplitude, and in a second phase of step b) a second amplitude of the response signal received at the same time at the receiver is detected,and in step c) the interface is judged to be in order or not in order based on the first and second amplitudes of the superimposed response signals obtained in said first and second phases, respectively.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein at the first amplitude of the test signal the transmitter is expected not to generate noise at the second frequency whereas at the second amplitude of the test signal, the transmitter is expected to generate noise at the second frequency, and step c) comprises the steps c1) of comparing the difference amount (Δ) between the first and second amplitudes of the received signal to a given limit (Δ1), and c2) of judging the interface to be out of order if the difference amount is below a given limit.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein if the difference amount (Δ) between the first and second amplitudes of the received signal is above the given limit (Δ1), the second amplitude of the test signal is reduced and steps b) and c1) are repeated until the difference amount (Δ) is below the given limit, and the interface is judged to be out of order if the thus obtained second amplitude is below a predetermined limit (Amin).

4. The method of claim 1 wherein at the first amplitude of the test signal the transmitter is expected not to generate noise at the second frequency, and if the difference between the first and second amplitudes of the received signal is below a given limit, the second amplitude of the test signal is increased and steps b) and c1) are repeated until either the second amplitude has reached a predefined maximum level or the difference amount is above the given limit, and the interface is judged to be out of order if the thus obtained second amplitude is below a predetermined limit.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein at the second amplitude of the test signal the transmitter is expected to generate noise at the second frequency, and if the difference between the first and second amplitudes of the received signal is below a given limit, the first amplitude of the test signal is decreased and steps a) and c1) are repeated until either the first amplitude has reached a predefined minimum level or the difference amount is above the given limit, and the interface is judged to be out of order if the thus obtained first amplitude is above a predetermined limit.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein steps a) to c) are repeated periodically and wherein the DMT signal comprises at least one carrier modulated with payload data.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the interface is between a subscriber line and a communication network, further comprising a step d) of transmitting a message indicating one of the first and second amplitudes of the received signal, the difference between these two amplitudes and the result of the judgment to a central station of the communication network.

8. The method of claim 7, further comprising the step of sending a trigger command for carrying out steps a) to d) from the central station of the network to said interface.