Robotic surgical systems and devices are well suited for use in performing minimally invasive medical procedures. For example, a robotic surgical system may be utilized to facilitate imaging, diagnosis, and treatment of tissues and vessels which may lie deep within a patient, and which may be preferably accessed only via naturally-occurring pathways such as blood vessels or the gastrointestinal tract.
One such robotic surgical system that may be utilized in a minimally invasive procedure is a robotic catheter system. A robotic catheter system utilizes a robot, external to the patient's body cavity, to insert a catheter through a small incision in a patient's body cavity and guide the catheter to a location of interest. Catheters may be steerable for movement in multiple axes, including axial translation (i.e., insertion and retraction), axial rotation, and deflection/articulation (including radial bending in multiple directions). To accomplish steering, one or more pullwires are attached to a distal articulating section of a catheter and extend through the catheter to at least the catheter's proximal end. The distal tip of the catheter may then be controlled via the pullwires (e.g., by selectively operating tensioning control elements, which control tension and/or displacement of the pullwires within the catheter instrument).
Kinematic modeling is utilized to predict catheter tip movement within the patient anatomy. The amount of displacement of a pullwire is generally proportional to the amount of articulation, enabling modeling of predicted catheter tip movement. However, at times, pullwire displacement may not result in the expected catheter tip articulation. Various elements can affect the amount of articulation for a given pullwire actuation, including the presence of unanticipated or un-modeled constraints imposed by the patient's anatomy, particularly given the tortuous path that the catheter must traverse. Additionally, pullwire displacement may result in an increase in pullwire tension rather than a change in catheter articulation if there is undetected slack in the pullwire. When unanticipated and un-modeled conditions or constraints exist, kinematic modeling may not accurately predict catheter tip movement leading to errors. Minimization of differences between actual and predicted kinematic functions is thus desirable to achieve a highly controllable robotic surgical system.
In robotic catheter systems, output shafts that actuate the pullwires connect the transmission elements in the catheter (e.g., pullwires) to motors in the robotic system. For the reasons discussed above, detecting load and/or torque on the output shafts as well as monitoring and controlling pullwire displacement may more accurately predict catheter tip movement than monitoring pullwire displacement alone.
Currently, some examples of robotic catheter systems are equipped with a rotary or shaft encoder. While the rotational position of the output shaft may be determined from the encoder, the torque applied at the output shaft may not be able to be precisely calculated because of variations in transmission efficiency and the effects of perturbations on the system due to catheter construction shape and use. Moreover, the encoder may not provide accurate information on load. For example, external forces on the catheter can change the loading on the catheter pullwires and, for a fixed position of the output shaft, in turn may change the torsion loading on the output shafts. As such, a need exists for improved load and/or torque sensing on the output shaft.
Another example of a robotic catheter system that utilizes a robot, external to the patient's body cavity, to insert and retract catheters and guidewires through a small incision in a patient's body cavity and guides the catheters/wires to a location of interest is described in U.S. application Ser. No. 13/835,136 and U.S. Ser. No. 13/839,967 (previously incorporated by reference). To accomplish linear translation (i.e., insertion and/or retraction) of the catheter or guidewire, this robotic catheter system uses a set of motors to rotate opposing wheels or rollers in opposite directions. In this system, the motors rotate to control the rate of linear translation. The angular rotation of the roller may be used to control the linear displacement of the catheter or guidewire. In other words, the linear travel of the catheter or wire is generally proportional to the angular rotation of the rollers. However, if higher insertion forces are encountered, the catheters or guidewires may slip between the rollers and not be inserted as far as intended. Some robotic systems incorporate torque sensors on the motors to measure the torque required to insert the catheter or guidewire.
In many robotic catheter systems, steering of the catheter is controlled by an instrument driver. The instrument driver may contain, for example, the one or more motors that drive the one or more output shafts. There is a need to keep the instrument driver of the robotic catheter system small so that it does not interfere with the available workspace in a surgical suite or catheterization lab. There are size constraints on all dimensions of the instrument driver. If the instrument driver of a surgical system is too wide, then it will obscure certain parts of the anatomy for an external imaging source such as a fluoroscopy system. If the instrument driver is too long, then the carriages cannot come close enough together on telescoping robotic systems, and the inner catheter cannot be inserted as far into the outer catheter, resulting in a need for longer catheters and a lack of control. If the instrument driver is too tall, then the angle of entry into the patient becomes too steep, resulting in access site injuries such as bleeding or hematomas.
A robotic vascular catheter system typically includes elongate members that include a sheath catheter, a leader catheter, and a guidewire. More generally, a robotic system for driving an elongate member into a patient lumen typically includes an outer elongate member, an inner elongate member, and a guidewire. Each is separately controllable and may telescope with respect to one another. For instance, a sheath carriage controls operation of the sheath (or outer elongate member) and is moveable along a generally axial direction aligned axially with the patient (referred to herein as the insertion axis), and a leader carriage controls operation of the leader (or inner elongate member) and a guidewire and is likewise moveable about the insertion axis of the patient. Typically, the leader carriage and the sheath carriage are positioned on an instrument driver often referred to as a remote catheter manipulator (RCM), which is supported by a setup joint (SUJ). Because the sheath carriage and leader carriage are traditionally aligned along the insertion axis, this configuration results in the RCM taking up significant space over the patient. If the RCM is too large, the system can interfere with other system operations (such as operation of the C-arm and/or monitors).
For instance, in some minimally-invasive surgery procedures, an imaging device such as a fluoroscopy system may be required in addition to the RCM. In such procedures, the imaging device may scan and image the entire body from the insertion site to the site of the medical procedure. If the RCM is too large, the RCM may obstruct the imaging device's ability to capture the entire desired imaging field.
Accordingly, despite the benefits of torque sensing, many robotic catheter systems do not have torque sensing due to the size constraints mentioned here. Therefore, there remains a need for a compact torque sensor that can provide the torque information needed to better control the catheter without increasing the size of the instrument driver.
In some embodiments, a robotic surgical system may include a control system electrically connectable to an input device and configured to receive information for positioning or orienting a catheter from the input device; the system may further include an instrument driver operatively connected to the control system. The instrument driver may include one or more articulation drive assemblies. Each articulation drive assembly may include: a motor configured to provide rotary output to actuate movement of an elongate member or other component of the surgical system; a gearbox configured to modify the rotary output of the motor; and a reactive torque sensor coaxial with and radially surrounding at least a portion of the rotary output motor and/or the gearbox. The motor may be at least partially within the reactive torque sensor to minimize height of the articulation drive assembly. The control system may be configured to actuate the motor in response to the information, from the input device, to drive an output shaft in communication with the elongate member. The instrument driver may be configured to determine an output shaft torque imparted by the output shaft to the elongate member. The reactive torque sensor may be coaxial with, and at least partially radially surround, both the rotary output motor and the gearbox. At least one of the gearbox and the motor may be mounted to the reactive torque sensor by a first mounting flange. The articulation drive assembly may be mounted to the instrument driver housing by the second mounting flange of the torque sensor. The first and second flanges may be configured to ground torque loads. The reactive torque sensor may further include at least one load cell configured to measure the output shaft torque. The articulation drive assembly may be configured to adjust a pullwire tension to impart motion to a tip of a catheter or elongate device or alternatively may be configured to rotate a drive wheel or roller on an active drive device to insert, retract, or rotate an elongate device. The system may further include a motor cable wrapped at least once around and communicatively coupled to at least one of the motor, the gearbox, and the torque sensor. The cable may be clock spring wound.
In some embodiments, an instrument driver for an elongate member of a robotic surgical system may include: a gearbox configured to actuate movement of the elongate member by driving an output shaft in communication with the elongate member; a rotary output motor axially-aligned with the gearbox and configured to drive the gearbox; and a reactive torque sensor radially surrounding the gearbox and configured to determine an output shaft torque imparted by the output shaft to the elongate member. The reactive torque sensor may provide a grounded mounting structure for the motor and gearbox. The reactive torque sensor may have a length shorter than the combined length of the motor and gearbox. The reactive torque sensor may have a length shorter than the gearbox. The rotary output motor may be a brushless low-profile outrunner motor. The instrument driver may further include a clock-spring style wound flat flex cable assembly configured to provide an electrical connection to the motor.
A method of measuring an output torque may include providing a rotary output shaft configured to actuate an elongate member, providing at least one output motor configured to actuate movement of the elongate member by driving the output shaft, and determining an output torque of the output shaft using a torque sensor disposed in surrounding relation to the motor. The method may further include establishing the sensor input as a reactive torque sensor input, the reactive torque sensor input measured via a connection between the reactive torque sensor and the motor. The method may further include providing a gearbox coupled to the motor. The method may further include modifying the output torque by sending a signal to the motor. The signal may be sent to the motor over a clock-spring style wound flat flex cable.
Referring now to the discussion that follows and also to the drawings, illustrative approaches to the disclosed assemblies are shown in detail. Although the drawings represent some possible approaches, the drawings are not necessarily to scale and certain features may be exaggerated, removed, or partially sectioned to better illustrate and explain the present disclosure. Further, the descriptions set forth herein are not intended to be exhaustive or otherwise limit or restrict the claims to the precise forms and configurations shown in the drawings and disclosed in the following detailed description.
As used herein, the term “catheter” may refer to any flexible elongate medical instrument.
Referring to
The operator workstation 112 may include a computer monitor to display an object, such as a catheter displayed within or relative to a body cavity or organ (e.g., a chamber of a patient's heart). In one example, an operator uses one or more input devices 120 to control the position of a catheter or other elongate instrument. In response to actuation of the input device by a user, the input device can output information for the desired position or orientation of the elongate instrument, including the three-dimensional spatial position and/or orientation of the distal end of a steerable elongate instrument. System components, including the operator workstation, electronics rack and the instrument driver, may be coupled together via a plurality of cables or other suitable connectors 118 to provide for data communication, or one or more components may be equipped with wireless communication components to reduce or eliminate cables 118. Communication between components may also be implemented over a network or over the internet. In this manner, a surgeon or other operator may control a surgical instrument while located away from or remotely from radiation sources. Because of the option for wireless or networked operation, the surgeon may even be located remotely from the patient in a different room or building.
The operator workstation 112, the electronic rack 114 and/or the instrument driver can form part of a control system 113. As will be explained below, the control system 113 can be configured to actuate a motor within the instrument driver 108 in response to information from the one or more input devices 120 and/or the instrument driver to drive an output shaft that can be used to control movement of one or more elongated members such as a sheath instrument 104 and/or an catheter instrument 106. The control system 113 can reside in one or more of the operator workstation 112, the electronic rack 114 and/or the instrument driver and/or in other components.
Referring now to
The articulation of catheters is normally performed by actuating pullwires that extend the length of the catheter and are attached to an articulating section of a catheter at or near the catheter's distal end. In order to articulate the catheter, the pullwire is manipulated and displaced at the proximal end to articulate the distal end of the catheter. Typically, the amount that an articulating section of a catheter articulates is determined by calculating the change in path length that an actuating pullwire takes. For a straight catheter, that length is equal to the articulating section, Lo. As the catheter bends (where α is the angle from the neutral axis, rc is the radius of the catheter, and τ is the articulation angle), the path length is equal to Lo−cos (α/90)*rc*τ. The difference—(α/90)*rc*τ—is the distance the pullwire must be actuated to make a catheter articulate to an angle τ, as illustrated in
In order to prepare a catheter to be manipulated and articulated by an instrument driver, the catheter is mounted to the instrument driver. More particularly, the catheter is provided with a splayer, which is mounted onto an interface plate. In some embodiments, as shown in
Embodiments with less or more than four pullwires are contemplated by the present disclosure. When, for example, a four-wire catheter 304 is coupled to the instrument driver 108, each drive shaft 316 thereof is thereby coupled to a different respective wire 504-510 (see
Robotic systems use these algorithms to determine the displacement of the pullwires to achieve the desired articulation of a catheter. However, differences between predicted and actual catheter position can result from the reliance by the kinematic model on certain assumptions and the lack of certain information. With rigid kinematics, simple geometry can be used to predict the location of any point along the rigid object given the following information: (1) a reference coordinate system; (2) an origin, or point in any coordinate system attached to the object; and (3) an orientation in any coordinate system attached to the object. Even with rigid structures, external forces, even gravity, may disrupt the ability to solve the location equation given the information above. If the above information is not sufficient to accurately describe the position of one point of an object from another point on the same object, then additional information must be provided, like the weight of the object, the forces acting on the object, the strength of the object, etc.
Standard equations and constants, like Poisson's ratio, Hertzian stresses, Modulus of Elasticity, and linear stress/strain equations can improve on the kinematic model but these methods break down once the strains exceed the standard elastic range (usually about 3%). For example, a slim bar may be straight under no distal loading and the equations to predict the location of the distal end are fairly effective. However, when a load is placed on the beam, the distal end will deflect, or strain under the load. Even in a purely elastic response to the load, the location or orientation of the distal end of the beam is impossible to predict without knowing the magnitude, the direction, and the location of the external load. Similarly, flexible instruments such as catheters with low strength can be deflected by unknown loads at unknown locations and in unknown directions. Yet, prediction of the location and orientation of the distal end of a catheter is an important aspect of a robotic catheter system. The orientation of the distal end of the catheter based on information measured at the proximal end can better be determined through embodiments of the present disclosure.
The exemplary illustrations herein may be applicable to a variety of ideas for effectively measuring tension in catheter pullwires, tension in pullwires in other surgical instruments and/or tension in components of other surgical or endoscopic instruments. Tension sensing may be used to enable or improve pretensioning, catheter control, slack wire management, catheter failure detection, etc., (e.g., as discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 9,173,713, previously incorporated by reference). The specific concepts presented herein may be applicable to techniques for obtaining torque measurements on output shafts of an instrument driver. Each will be addressed in further detail below.
The torque sensor 616 may be a component of the assembly configured to measure torque, and may act as a sensed mounting structure or load cell. It may be configured as a reactive torque sensor that measures torque induced strain using one or more self-contained strain gauges to create a load cell. The torque sensor 616 and components thereof may be configured to be communicatively coupled to another component or part of a system, such as the control system 113, in order to transmit and/or receive signals, such as a measured torque reading. For example, as explained further below, in some embodiments, the output torque produced by the motor 620 and/or gearbox 622 about the axis 619 can be measured or determined from a reaction torque required to prevent the motor 620 and/or gearbox 622 from turning. Advantageously, the use of a reactive torque sensor 616 may eliminate the need for a rotary signal transmission method, thereby reducing complexity and cost of the overall assembly 614. Advantageously, the use of the reactive torque sensor 616 according to certain embodiments described herein can result in a particularly compact torque sensor arrangement that can provide torque information to control a device used with an instrument driver without increasing the size or only minimally increasing the size of the instrument driver.
For clarity of description, as used herein, the terms “torque sensor,” “reactive torque sensor,” and “reaction torque sensor” interchangeably refer broadly, without limitation, to a device that converts a torsional mechanical input into an output such as an electrical signal and can be used to measure torque.
In some embodiments, the sensor 616 with integrated strain gauges 621 may be a flexure-based structure. In some embodiments, the torque sensor 616 may include mounting flanges 618 connected by struts 619 to create the flexure based structure. In some embodiments, the strain gauges 621 are attached to the struts 619 of the structure to ensure the strain is detected by a strain gauge 621. The length and thickness of the struts 619 of the flexure-based structure may be designed to allow a Wheatstone bridge or a strain gauge to sense torque-induced strain.
The torque sensor 616 may be hollow, have an inner lumen, or be otherwise configured to be disposed around the motor 620, gearbox 622, and/or encoder 626. In one embodiment, the torque sensor may form a ring around the motor 620, gearbox 622, and/or encoder 626. The torque sensor 616 may partially or completely radially surround and be coaxial with a portion of or the entirety of the motor 620, the gearbox 622, and/or the gearbox output shaft 624. For example, the torque sensor 616 may define an opening 617 (see
The assembly 614 may be configured such that the torque sensor 616 does not add any overall length to the assembly 614 along the axis 629. For example, the length of the assembly 614 along the axis 629 is the same length with or without the torque sensor 616. Some embodiments may be configured such that the torque sensor 616 does not add any overall length to the combined length of the motor 620 and the gearbox 622, such that the length of the motor 620 and the gearbox 622 combined is the same with or without the torque sensor 616. In some embodiments, the torque sensor 616 is shorter in length than the motor 620 and/or gearbox 622. In some embodiments, the torque sensor 616 is sized and shaped such that the motor 620, gearbox 622, and/or gearbox output shaft 624 do not extend radially beyond the torque sensor 616. The torque sensor 616 may circumscribe the motor 620 and/or the gearbox 622.
The torque sensor 616 may be configured to provide a main grounded mounting structure for the motor 620, the gearbox 622, and/or the encoder 626, which may otherwise be suspended and free floating. For example, one or more of the motor 620, the gearbox 622, and the encoder 626 may be mounted to the torque sensor 616 using one or more mounting flanges 618 or other component. The mounting flanges 618 may have any suitable shape and structure that facilitates mounting or attachment of the torque sensor 616 to another component. The mounting flanges 618 may include an upper flange and a lower flange. In some embodiments, the mounting flanges may form a ring. The upper flange may be a flange that is closer to the output shaft 624 than a lower flange. In some embodiments, a flange (e.g., the lower flange) may be mounted to the motor 620 and/or the gearbox 622. In some embodiments, a flange (e.g., the upper flange) or another part of the torque sensor 616 may ground torque loads by attaching to an instrument driver housing or another grounded structure. For example, a flange may be grounded to the chassis of an instrument. Thus, in some embodiments, the torque produced by the motor 620 and/or gear box 622 about the axis 619 (see
In some embodiments, the motor 620 may be a brushless low-profile outrunner motor 620; however, other kinds of motors may be used. In some embodiments, the gearbox 622 may be configured to increase torque and decrease rotational speed that is output from the motor 620, but other configurations may also be used. The output shaft 624 may be directly or indirectly connected to a component of a system to be driven (e.g., an elongate member). The encoder 626 may be any kind of measurement device configured to measure the rotational movement of one or more components. The encoder 626 may be an optical encoder, a magnetic encoder, or other kind of encoder. The cable 628 may be a cable for transmitting energy or signals and may be communicatively coupled to one or more of the torque sensor 616, the motor 620, the gearbox 622, the encoder 626 and/or other components. The cable 628 may be configured as a clock spring wound flat flex cable, which may minimize the torsional resistance that motor leads would normally produce. The cable may also be configured as a different kind of wrapped or other cabling system. The wound or wrapped configuration of the cable 628 may increase the usable resolution of the torque sensor 616. The cable 628 may be axially aligned with and surround or partially surround the torque sensor 616, motor 620, and gearbox 622.
While the various components of the assembly 614 have been illustrated as separate components, they need not be. For example, the gear box 622 may be incorporated into the motor 620. As another example, the torque sensor 616 need not be a separate apparatus. It may be integrated into a wall of the gearbox or motor, into a housing or grounded plane 623, and/or into another structure.
At block 1504, at least one output motor is provided. For example, as described above, exemplary output motors may be configured to actuate movement of the elongate member by rotating the output shaft.
At block 1506, an output torque of the output shaft is detected or determined (e.g., based at least upon one sensor input). In an example, a load beam, load cell, or a torque sensor (e.g., as described above as torque sensor 616) may be employed. In examples where a load cell is employed, the load cell may be configured to measure the output shaft torque based upon at least a deflection of the load cell. In an example, load cells may have a cantilever mounting within the instrument driver. In various embodiments, the output torque is detected or determined utilizing a torque sensor assembly disposed around one or more of the provided output shaft and output motor, as described above.
At block 1508, rotation of the output shaft may be modified (e.g., by adjusting one or more parameters of a motor or gearbox) based on the output torque. By modifying the rotation of the output shaft, tension on a pull wire coupled to the output shaft may be modified. Such a pull wire may be disposed within an elongate member. This may, for example, impart a bend or other motion to an articulating section of the elongate member. In another example, modifying the output from the output shaft may actuate a roller of an active drive system.
In one example embodiment of use for controlling output torque and/or controlling movement of an elongated member can include actuating movement of an elongated member by rotating an output shaft with a motor. Some embodiments can include detecting or determining output torque of the output shaft based at least in part upon on a sensor input. For example, the sensor input can be based upon the torque induced strain along a torque sensor which can be disposed around one or more of the output shaft or motor (e.g., as the reactive torque sensor 616 described herein). The method can also include actuating the motor in response to the measured or determined output torque to drive the output shaft. The rotation of the output shaft 624 can be modified (e.g. by adjusting one or more parameters of a motor or gearbox) based on the measured or determined output torque. The method of use can include modifying tension on a pull wire or another element of the system by modifying rotation of the output shaft in response to the measured or determined output torque. In some embodiments, the control system 113 is configured modify rotation of the output shaft in response to the measured or determined output torque.
In various embodiments, by determining and selectively modifying the output torque (e.g., rotation of the output shaft), the output torque can be carefully controlled. In some embodiments, this control enables a robotic catheter system to precisely and accurately tension one or more pull wires in an elongate member so that the resultant articulation of the elongate member precisely and accurately reflects the articulation commanded by a user at an input device based on improved modeling of predicted catheter tip movement.
The exemplary systems and components described herein (e.g., workstation 112, electronics rack 118, the control system 113, the exemplary instrument drivers, and/or any components thereof) may include a computer or a computer readable storage medium or computer readable memory that has stored thereon executable instructions and there can be one or more processors in communication with the computer readable memory that are configured of execute the instructions to implement the operation of drive and implement the various methods and processes described herein. In general, computing systems and/or devices, such as user input devices included in the workstation 112 and/or the control system 113 or any components thereof, merely as examples, may employ any of a number of computer operating systems, including, but by no means limited to, versions and/or varieties of the Microsoft Windows operating system, the Unix operating system (e.g., the Solaris operating system distributed by Oracle Corporation of Redwood Shores, Calif.), the AIX UNIX operating system distributed by International Business Machines of Armonk, N.Y., the Linux operating system, the Mac OS X and iOS operating systems distributed by Apple Inc. of Cupertino, Calif., and the Android operating system developed by the Open Handset Alliance.
Computing devices generally include computer-executable instructions, where the instructions may be executable by one or more computing devices such as those listed above. Computer-executable instructions may be compiled or interpreted from computer programs created using a variety of programming languages and/or technologies, including, without limitation, and either alone or in combination, Java, C, C++, Visual Basic, Java Script, Perl, etc. In general, a processor (e.g., a microprocessor) receives instructions, e.g., from a memory, a computer-readable medium, etc., and executes these instructions, thereby performing one or more processes, including one or more of the processes described herein. Such instructions and other data may be stored and transmitted using a variety of computer-readable media.
A computer-readable medium (also referred to as a processor-readable medium or computer readable memory) includes any non-transitory (e.g., tangible) medium that participates in providing data (e.g., instructions) that may be read by a computer (e.g., by a processor of a computer). Such a medium may take many forms, including, but not limited to, non-volatile media and volatile media. Non-volatile media may include, for example, optical or magnetic disks and other persistent memory. Volatile media may include, for example, dynamic random access memory (DRAM), which typically constitutes a main memory. Such instructions may be transmitted by one or more transmission media, including coaxial cables, copper wire and fiber optics, including the wires that include a system bus coupled to a processor of a computer. Common forms of computer-readable media include, for example, a floppy disk, a flexible disk, hard disk, magnetic tape, any other magnetic medium, a CD-ROM, DVD, any other optical medium, punch cards, paper tape, any other physical medium with patterns of holes, a RAM, a PROM, an EPROM, a FLASH-EEPROM, any other memory chip or cartridge, or any other medium from which a computer can read.
Databases, data repositories or other data stores described herein may include various kinds of mechanisms for storing, accessing, and retrieving various kinds of data, including a hierarchical database, a set of files in a file system, an application database in a proprietary format, a relational database management system (RDBMS), etc. Each such data store is generally included within a computing device employing a computer operating system such as one of those mentioned above, and are accessed via a network in any one or more of a variety of manners. A file system may be accessible from a computer operating system, and may include files stored in various formats. An RDBMS generally employs the Structured Query Language (SQL) in addition to a language for creating, storing, editing, and executing stored procedures, such as the PL/SQL language mentioned above.
In some examples, system elements may be implemented as computer-readable instructions (e.g., software) on one or more computing devices (e.g., servers, personal computers, etc.), stored on computer readable media associated therewith (e.g., disks, memories, etc.). A computer program product may have such instructions stored on computer readable media for carrying out the functions described herein.
With regard to the processes, systems, methods, etc. described herein, it should be understood that, although the steps of such processes, etc. have been described as occurring according to a certain ordered sequence, such processes could be practiced with the described steps performed in an order other than the order described herein. It further should be understood that certain steps could be performed simultaneously, that other steps could be added, or that certain steps described herein could be omitted. In other words, the descriptions of processes herein are provided for the purpose of illustrating certain examples, and should in no way be construed so as to limit the claims.
Accordingly, it is to be understood that the above description is intended to be illustrative and not restrictive. Many examples and applications other than the examples provided would be apparent upon reading the above description. The scope should be determined, not with reference to the above description, but should instead be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. It is anticipated and intended that future developments will occur in the technologies discussed herein, and that the disclosed systems and methods will be incorporated into such future examples. In sum, it should be understood that the application is capable of modification and variation.
All terms used in the claims are intended to be given their broadest reasonable constructions and their ordinary meanings as understood by those knowledgeable in the technologies described herein unless an explicit indication to the contrary in made herein. In particular, use of the singular articles such as “a,” “the,” “said,” etc. should be read to recite one or more of the indicated elements unless a claim recites an explicit limitation to the contrary.
The Abstract of the Disclosure is provided to allow the reader to quickly ascertain the nature of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims. In addition, in the foregoing Detailed Description, it can be seen that various features are grouped together in various examples for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed embodiments require more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive subject matter lies in less than all features of a single disclosed embodiment. Thus the following claims are hereby incorporated into the Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separately claimed subject matter.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application 62/329,617, filed Apr. 29, 2016, the entirety of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein for any and all purposes as if set forth herein in its entirety. Embodiments described in this application may be used in combination or conjunction with the subject matter described in one or more of the following, each of which is hereby fully incorporated by reference for any and all purposes as if set forth herein in their entireties: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/835,136, filed Mar. 15, 2013, entitled “ACTIVE DRIVE MECHANISM FOR SIMULTANEOUS ROTATION AND TRANSLATION;” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/839,967, filed Mar. 15, 2013, entitled “VASCULAR REMOTE CATHETER MANIPULATOR;” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/214,711, filed Mar. 14, 2013, entitled “CATHETER TENSION SENSING;” and U.S. Pat. No. 9,173,713, issued Nov. 3, 2015, entitled “TORQUE-BASED CATHETER ARTICULATION.”
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2556601 | Schofield | Jun 1951 | A |
2566183 | Forss | Aug 1951 | A |
2730699 | Gratian | Jan 1956 | A |
2884808 | Mueller | May 1959 | A |
3294183 | Riley et al. | Dec 1966 | A |
3472083 | Schnepel | Oct 1969 | A |
3513724 | Box | May 1970 | A |
3595074 | Johnson | Jul 1971 | A |
3734207 | Fishbein | May 1973 | A |
4141245 | Brandstetter | Feb 1979 | A |
4241884 | Lynch | Dec 1980 | A |
4243034 | Brandt | Jan 1981 | A |
4351493 | Sonnek | Sep 1982 | A |
4357843 | Peck et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4384493 | Grunbaum | May 1983 | A |
4507026 | Lund | Mar 1985 | A |
4530471 | Inoue | Jul 1985 | A |
4555960 | King | Dec 1985 | A |
4688555 | Wardle | Aug 1987 | A |
4745908 | Wardle | May 1988 | A |
4784150 | Voorhies et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4907168 | Boggs | Mar 1990 | A |
4945790 | Golden | Aug 1990 | A |
5207128 | Albright | May 1993 | A |
5234428 | Kaufman | Aug 1993 | A |
5256150 | Quiachon et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5277085 | Tanimura et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5350101 | Godlewski | Sep 1994 | A |
5426687 | Goodall et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5507725 | Savage et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5559294 | Hoium et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5767840 | Selker | Jun 1998 | A |
5779623 | Bonnell | Jul 1998 | A |
5792135 | Madhani et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5855583 | Wang et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5921968 | Lampropoulos et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5967934 | Ishida et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6084371 | Kress et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6154000 | Rastegar et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6171234 | White et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185478 | Koakutsu et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6272371 | Shlomo | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289579 | Viza et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6394998 | Wallace et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6401572 | Provost | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6436107 | Wang et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6487940 | Hart et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6491701 | Tierney et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6695818 | Wollschlager | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6726675 | Beyar | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6786896 | Madhani et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6827712 | Tovey et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
7044936 | Harding | May 2006 | B2 |
7172580 | Hruska et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7276044 | Ferry et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7615042 | Beyar et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7635342 | Ferry et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7766856 | Ferry et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7938809 | Lampropoulos et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7974674 | Hauck et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7998020 | Kidd et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8052636 | Moll et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8157308 | Pedersen | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8182415 | Larkin et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8291791 | Light et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8746252 | McGrogan et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8961533 | Stahler et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9173713 | Hart et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9204933 | Reis et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9326822 | Lewis et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9408669 | Kokish et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9452018 | Yu | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9457168 | Moll et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9498601 | Tanner et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9504604 | Alvarez | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9561083 | Yu et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9622827 | Yu et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9636184 | Lee et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9636483 | Hart et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9668814 | Kokish | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9713509 | Schuh et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9727963 | Mintz et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9737371 | Romo et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9737373 | Schuh | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9744335 | Jiang | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9763741 | Alvarez et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9788910 | Schuh | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9818681 | Machida | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9844412 | Bogusky et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9867635 | Alvarez et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9931025 | Graetzel et al. | Apr 2018 | B1 |
9949749 | Noonan et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9955986 | Shah | May 2018 | B2 |
9962228 | Schuh et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9980785 | Schuh | May 2018 | B2 |
9993313 | Schuh et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10016900 | Meyer et al. | Jul 2018 | B1 |
10022192 | Ummalaneni | Jul 2018 | B1 |
20010042643 | Krueger et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020045905 | Gerbi et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020098938 | Milbourne et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020117017 | Bernhardt et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020161355 | Wollschlager | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020177789 | Ferry et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20040015053 | Bieger | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040152972 | Hunter | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040243147 | Lipow | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050183532 | Najaf et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050222554 | Wallace et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060111692 | Hlavka et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060201688 | Jenner et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060237205 | Sia et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070000498 | Glynn et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070013336 | Nowlin et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070060879 | Weitzner et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070112355 | Salahieh | May 2007 | A1 |
20070149946 | Viswanathan | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070191177 | Nagai et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070245175 | Zheng et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070299427 | Yeung et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080039255 | Jinno et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046122 | Manzo et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080065103 | Cooper et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080147011 | Urmey | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080177285 | Brock et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080214925 | Wilson et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243064 | Stahler et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080249536 | Stahler et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080253108 | Yu et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262301 | Gibbons et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080302200 | Tobey | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090082722 | Munger et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090098971 | Ho et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090171371 | Nixon | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090247944 | Kirschenman et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100030023 | Yoshie | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100069833 | Wenderow et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100073150 | Olson et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100130987 | Wenderow et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100204646 | Plicchi et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100210923 | Li et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100248177 | Mangelberger et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110015484 | Alvarez et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110015648 | Alvarez et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110028991 | Ikeda et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110130718 | Kidd et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110147030 | Blum et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110238083 | Moll et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110261183 | Ma et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110277775 | Holop et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110288573 | Yates et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110306836 | Ohline et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120071621 | Yu | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120071894 | Tanner et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120071895 | Stahler et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120143226 | Belson et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120150154 | Brisson et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120186194 | Schlieper | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120191107 | Tanner et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120239012 | Laurent et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120283747 | Popovic | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130018400 | Milton et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130144116 | Cooper et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130231678 | Wenderow | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130304084 | Beira et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130317519 | Romo et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130345519 | Piskun et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140000411 | Shelton, IV et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140069437 | Reis et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140142591 | Alvarez et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140166023 | Kishi | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140222019 | Brudnick | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140276233 | Murphy | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276389 | Walker | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276394 | Wong et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276594 | Tanner et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276935 | Yu | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276936 | Kokish et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277334 | Yu et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140309649 | Alvarez et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140357984 | Wallace et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140364670 | Alvarez et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140379000 | Romo et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150051592 | Kintz | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150090063 | Lantermann et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150101442 | Romo | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150119638 | Yu et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150133963 | Barbagli | May 2015 | A1 |
20150142013 | Tanner et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150148600 | Ashinuma et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150164594 | Romo et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150164596 | Romo | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150182250 | Conlon et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150297864 | Kokish et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150327939 | Kokish et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150335480 | Alvarez et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150374445 | Gombert et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160001038 | Romo et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160166234 | Zhang | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160235946 | Lewis et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160270865 | Landey et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160287279 | Bovay et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160296294 | Moll et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160338783 | Romo et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160338785 | Kokish et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160346049 | Allen et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160354582 | Yu et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160374541 | Agrawal et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170007337 | Dan | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170007343 | Yu | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170071684 | Kokish et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170100199 | Yu et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170105804 | Yu | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170119413 | Romo | May 2017 | A1 |
20170119481 | Romo et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170119484 | Tanner et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170151028 | Ogawa et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170165011 | Bovay et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170172673 | Yu et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170202627 | Sramek et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170209073 | Sramek et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170209672 | Hart et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170252540 | Weitzner et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170290631 | Lee et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170296784 | Kokish | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170333679 | Jiang | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170340396 | Romo et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170365055 | Mintz et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170367782 | Schuh et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180025666 | Ho et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180042464 | Arai | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180049792 | Eckert | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180056044 | Choi et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180177383 | Noonan et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180177556 | Noonan et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180177561 | Mintz et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101500470 | Aug 2009 | CN |
102665590 | Sep 2012 | CN |
19649082 | Jan 1998 | DE |
102004020465 | Sep 2005 | DE |
1 442 720 | Aug 2004 | EP |
3 025 630 | Jun 2016 | EP |
2009-139187 | Jun 2009 | JP |
2010-046384 | Mar 2010 | JP |
WO 02074178 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 09092059 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO 11005335 | Jan 2011 | WO |
WO 13179600 | Dec 2013 | WO |
WO 15127231 | Aug 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Mayo Clinic, Robotic Surgery, https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/robotic-surgery/about/pac-20394974?p=1, downloaded from the internet on Jul. 12, 2018, 2 pp. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170312481 A1 | Nov 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62329617 | Apr 2016 | US |