The field of the invention relates to compact ported cylinder constructions for opposed-piston engines.
A cylinder for an internal combustion engine may be constructed by boring an engine block or by inserting a liner (also called a sleeve) into a cylindrical space formed in an engine block. The following description presumes a cylinder with a liner construction; however the underlying principles apply as well to a bored construction.
A cylinder liner of an opposed-piston engine has a cylindrical inner wall that provides a bore with a longitudinal axis. Intake and exhaust ports are formed in the liner wall and located on respective sides of a central portion of the liner. Each port includes a plurality of port openings disposed in an annular array along a respective circumference of the liner, and adjacent openings are separated by solid portions of the liner wall called “bridges” or “bars”. (In some descriptions, each opening is referred to as a “port”; however, the construction of a circumferential array of such “ports” is no different than the port constructions described herein.) So constructed, the liner forms a “ported cylinder” when received in an opposed-piston engine.
When considering packaging in many applications, the length of a cylinder is one of the primary challenges of an opposed-piston engine. This is because there are two pistons coaxially disposed for opposed sliding motion in the bore between a top dead center location (hereinafter, “TDC”) and a bottom dead center location (hereinafter, “BDC”). Thus, the cylinder must be long enough to accommodate at least twice the length of each piston; in other words, the length of the cylinder is generally ≥4× the piston length. Any incremental reduction in these fundamental length limitations is therefore desirable when reduction in the engine profile is pursued.
Commonly-owned U.S. Pat. No. 8,935,998 describes a compact cylinder liner construction for an opposed-piston engine. As per a typical opposed-piston application including a ported liner, each piston in the cylinder is associated with a respective one of the two ports. In most applications, each piston has an upper ring pack adjacent the top land of the piston crown for containing combustion, and a lower ring pack in its lower skirt portion with which lubricant (engine oil) is scraped from the bore. Generally, the piston is somewhat longer than the longitudinal distance between the ring packs. When the piston is at TDC, the oil control (lower) ring pack is positioned near the outer edge of the port with which the piston is associated. The '998 patent describes a transition pattern in the bore diameter that permits an oil control ring pack to more closely approach the outer edge of the port when the piston is at TDC. This allows the length of the piston to be shortened, thereby leading to a reduction in the required cylinder length.
It is known that two-stroke cycle, opposed-piston engines provide superior power densities and brake thermal efficiencies as compared to their four-stroke counterparts. However, the length of the cylinder places a hurdle in the path of broad acceptance of opposed-piston technologies, especially in transportation applications where engine compartment space is limited. Accordingly, further reductions in cylinder length will extend the range of applications of opposed-piston technology.
The invention provides for a compact, ported cylinder for an opposed-piston engine in which the exhaust port is of such a length as to cause it to be fully open before the piston associated with it reaches BDC during an expansion stroke. In this regard the height of the exhaust port is considered to be truncated with respect to a prior art exhaust port in which the port is only fully open when the associated piston reaches BDC.
The liner bore has a central portion where opposed pistons reach respective top dead center locations to form a combustion chamber. The central portion of the bore transitions to respective end portions that extend from the intake and exhaust ports to respective open ends of the liner. A respective piston bottom dead center location is in each end portion. An end portion also includes the bridges and openings of a port and the remaining liner portion from the port to the nearest open end of the liner.
Each port has inner and outer edges that are spaced apart in a longitudinal direction of the liner such that the inner edge is nearest an injector plane orthogonal to the longitudinal axis of the bore and the outer edge is furthest from the injector plane. The outer edge of the port is disposed in the bore at a location spaced inwardly of the liner, in the direction of the injector plane, from the top of the associated piston when at BDC. As a consequence, the oil control ring pack of the associated piston can be located nearer the upper ring pack, thereby reducing the length of the piston, which, in turn enables reduction of the length of the cylinder.
Each piston has a crown 20c, 22c and a skirt 20s, 22s. The crown has an upper land 20l, 22l and a circular peripheral edge 20p, 22p where the upper land meets the end surface 20e, 22e of the crown. Below the upper land, a series of circumferential ring grooves is provided in the piston sidewall to receive a compression ring pack 20r, 22r. The compression ring pack includes at least two piston rings; in some instances, the topmost piston ring (the ring nearest the upper land) is a compression ring which seals the combustion chamber. A series of circumferential grooves in the lower portion of the piston skirt receive an oil control ring pack 20o, 22o. The oil control ring pack includes at least two piston rings; in some instances, the topmost ring (the ring nearest the upper ring pack) is an oil scraper ring, which maintains a consistent thickness of oil between an open end and a port. The exhaust and intake ports 14 and 16 of the cylinder liner 11 are similarly constructed. In this regard, each port includes at least one annular array of openings 28e, 28i along a respective circumference of the cylinder 11. For convenience, the port openings are shown with identical shapes, but it is frequently the case that the exhaust port openings will be of a different shape, and larger, than the intake port openings.
In a two-stroke cycle operation of the opposed-piston engine 10 presume that the piston end surfaces 20e and 22e are in the central portion of the cylinder liner 11, near TDC, at the moment of combustion, as shown in
In some cases, the pistons may be out of phase with one another. For example, crankshaft 1 to which the exhaust piston 20 is coupled (the “exhaust crank”) may lead crankshaft 2 to which the intake piston 22 is coupled (the “intake crank”), thereby causing the exhaust piston 20 to lead the intake piston 22, in which case the exhaust port 14 will be opened (and closed) before the intake port 16. As the exhaust piston 20 traverses the exhaust port 14, moving toward BDC, combustion gases will start to exit the exhaust port. The intake port 16 will then begin to open as the intake piston 22 traverses it toward BDC. Pressurized fresh air (“charge air”) will enter the cylinder bore 12 and begin to scavenge any remaining combustion gases out of the exhaust port 14. As the pistons 20 and 22 travel through their respective BDC positions and start to return to TDC in a compression stroke, charge air continues to flow into the bore until the exhaust port 14 is closed by the exhaust piston 20 and the intake port 16 is closed by the intake piston 22. At this point, as the exhaust and intake pistons 20 and 22 continue sliding towards TDC the charge air trapped in the cylinder bore 12 by closure of the ports 14 and 16 is increasingly compressed, which raises its temperature. When the end surfaces 20e and 22e of the two pistons are adjacent as per
Referring now to
As best seen in
As best seen in
As best seen in
Presume now that the construction of the cylinder liner of
The compact cylinder liner construction according to the invention can be further understood with reference to the positional relationships between the cylinder and piston during engine operation, while the piston moves between TDC and BDC. In this regard, with reference to
As per
Reduction of the length of the liner may be seen in
Although compact cylinder construction according to the invention is illustrated by reduction of exhaust port height, this is not meant to exclude the achievement of the same goals by reducing intake port height in the same manner or by reducing both exhaust and intake port height as disclosed.
Once port height according to the invention is incorporated into the design of a two-stroke, opposed-piston engine for the purpose of reducing cylinder length, other design tradeoffs are possible. For example, If a two-stroke, opposed-piston engine of a given displacement shares equal stroke lengths for the intake and the exhaust pistons, then there is a limit to how short the ports may become before the engine performance suffers. At this limit, the exhaust port shortening relative to the intake port shortening is almost always considerably greater. In a specific case of an engine with 200 mm combined stroke (100 mm intake and 100 mm exhaust), I have found that the shortening of the exhaust port may be on the order of 10 mm-14 mm, while the shortening of the intake port may be on the order of 2 mm-3 mm. The total shortening potential is therefore 12 mm-17 mm. For the same combined stroke of 200 mm, the exhaust stroke may be increased to 120 mm if the intake stroke is reduced to 80 mm. If the same proportions are assumed, the exhaust end of the cylinder may be reduced by 12 mm-16.8 mm, and the intake end may be reduced by 1.6 mm-2.4 mm. The total shortening potential in this example could then be 13.6 mm-19.2 mm. Thus, there is the potential to shorten a two-stroke, opposed-piston engine of a given displacement even further if unequal strokes are applied.
Although principles of ported cylinder and piston constructions have been described with reference to presently preferred embodiments, it should be understood that various modifications can be made without departing from the spirit of the described principles. Accordingly, the patent protection accorded to these principles is limited only by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1808664 | Koschka | Jun 1931 | A |
2170020 | Gerlach | Aug 1939 | A |
2393085 | Wuehr | Jan 1946 | A |
2624328 | Grinham et al. | Jan 1953 | A |
2925073 | Millar | Feb 1960 | A |
3866581 | Herbert | Feb 1975 | A |
4480597 | Noguchi | Nov 1984 | A |
5213067 | Kramer | May 1993 | A |
6953010 | Hofbauer | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7438038 | Azevedo et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
8413632 | Sand | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8935998 | Tebbe | Jan 2015 | B1 |
9068498 | Callahan | Jun 2015 | B2 |
20050103287 | Hofbauer | May 2005 | A1 |
20100024759 | Dobransky | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20120186561 | Bethel et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120306207 | Gudgeon | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130199503 | Callahan et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140216425 | Callahan | Aug 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4335515 | Apr 1995 | DE |
1124052 | Mar 2007 | EP |
1041852 | Sep 1966 | GB |
WO 2009061873 | May 2009 | WO |
WO 2015038425 | Mar 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT application PCT/US2016/058777, dated Jan. 12, 2017. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT application PCT/US2014/054235, dated Feb. 3, 2015. |
Pirault, J and Flint, M. Opposed Piston Engines: Evolution, Use, and Future Applications, SAE International, Warrendale Penna., Oct. 2009, Section 3.2: Junkers Jumo 2005; pp. 55-106. |
Pirault, J and Flint, M. Opposed Piston Engines: Evolution, Use, and Future . Applications, SAE International, Warrendale Penna., Oct. 2009, Section 3.3: Junkers Jumo 2007B2; pp. 102-119. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170122185 A1 | May 2017 | US |