Compensation technique for color shift in displays

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9418587
  • Patent Number
    9,418,587
  • Date Filed
    Monday, July 13, 2015
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 16, 2016
    8 years ago
Abstract
A system for maintaining a substantially constant display white point over an extended period of operation of a color display formed by an array of multiple pixels in which each of the pixels includes multiple subpixels having different colors, and each of the subpixels includes a light emissive device. The display is generated by energizing the subpixels of successively selected pixels, and the color of each selected pixel is controlled by the relatives levels of energization of the subpixels in the selected pixel. The degradation behavior of the subpixels in each pixel is determined, and the relative levels of energization of the subpixels in each pixel are adjusted to adjust the brightness shares of the subpixels to compensate for the degradation behavior of the subpixels. The brightness shares are preferably adjusted to maintain a substantially constant display white point.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention is directed generally to color displays that use light emissive devices such as OLEDs and, more particularly, to compensating for color shifts in such displays as the light emissive devices age.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Previous compensation technique for OLED displays considered backplane aging and OLED efficiency lost. The aging (and/or uniformity) of the panel was extracted and stored in lookup tables as raw or processed data. Then a compensation block used the stored data to compensate for any shift in the electrical parameters of the backplane (e.g., threshold voltage shift) or the OLED (e.g., shift in the OLED operating voltage). Such techniques can be used to compensate for OLED efficiency losses as well. These techniques are based on the assumption that the OLED color coordinates are stable despite reductions in the OLED efficiency. Depending on the OLED material and the required device lifetime, this can be a valid assumption. However, for OLED materials with low stability in color coordinates, this can result in excessive display color shifts and image sticking issues.


The color coordinates (i.e., chromaticity) of an OLED shift over time. These shifts are more pronounced in white OLEDs since the different color components that are combined in an OLED structure used to create white light can shift differently (e.g., the blue portion may age faster than the red or green portion of the combined OLED stack), leading to undesirable shifts in the display white point, which in turn lead to artifacts such as image sticking. Moreover, this phenomenon is applicable to other OLEDs as well, such as OLEds that consist of only single color components in a stack (i.e., single Red OLED stack, single GREEN OLED stack, etc.). As a result, color shifts that occur in the display can cause severe image sticking issues.


SUMMARY

Additional aspects of the invention will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art in view of the detailed description of various embodiments, which is made with reference to the drawings, a brief description of which is provided below.


In accordance with one embodiment, a system is provided for maintaining a substantially constant display white point over an extended period of operation of a color display formed by an array of multiple pixels in which each of the pixels includes multiple subpixels having different colors, and each of the subpixels includes a light emissive device. The display is generated by energizing the subpixels of successively selected pixels, and the color of each selected pixel is controlled by the relatives levels of energization of the subpixels in the selected pixel. The degradation behavior of the subpixels in each pixel is determined, and the relative levels of energization of the subpixels in each pixel are adjusted to adjust the brightness shares of the subpixels to compensate for the degradation behavior of the subpixels. The brightness shares are preferably adjusted to maintain a substantially constant display white point.


In one implementation, the light emissive devices are OLEDs, and the degradation behavior used is a shift in the chromaticity coordinates of the subpixels of a selected pixel, such as a white pixel in an RGBW display. The voltage at a current input to each OLED is measured and used in the determining the shift in the chromaticity coordinates.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention may best be understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.



FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram of system for compensating for color shifts in the pixels of a color display using OLEDs.



FIG. 2 is a CIE chromaticity diagram.



FIG. 3 is a flow chart of a procedure for compensating for color shifts in the system of FIG. 1.



FIG. 4A is a pair of graphs representing variations in the chromaticity coordinates Cx of the measured brightness values of two white OLEDs subjected to two different stress conditions, as a function of the difference between the measured OLED voltages and a non-aged reference OLED.



FIG. 4B is a pair of graphs representing variations in the chromaticity coordinates Cy of the measured brightness values of two white OLEDs subjected to two different stress conditions, as a function of the difference between the measured OLED voltages and a non-aged reference OLED.



FIG. 5 is a graph representing variations in a brightness correction factor as a function of the OLED voltage a white OLED subjected to one of stress conditions depicted in FIG. 4.



FIG. 6 is a functional block diagram of a modified system for compensating for color shifts in the pixels of a color display using OLEDs.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE ILLUSTRATED EMBODIMENTS

Although the invention will be described in connection with certain preferred embodiments, it will be understood that the invention is not limited to those particular embodiments. On the contrary, the invention is intended to include all alternatives, modifications and equivalent arrangements as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.



FIG. 1 illustrates a system in which the brightness of each subpixel is adjusted, based on the aging of at latest one of the subpixels in each pixel, to maintain a substantially constant display white point over time, such as the operating life of a display, e.g., 75,000 hours. For example, in an RGBW display, if the white OLED in a pixel loses part of its blue color component, thus producing a warmer white than desired, the blue OLED in that same pixel may be turned on along with the white OLED in that same pixel, during a white display. Similarly, in an RGB display, the brightness shares of the red, green and blue OLEDs may be dynamically adjusted over time in response to each OLED's degradation behavior, to keep the white point of the display substantially constant. In either case, the amount of change required in the brightness of each subpixel can be extracted from the shift in the color coordinates of one or more of the subpixels. This can be implemented by a series of calculations or by use of a look-up table containing pre-calculated values, to determine the correlation between shifts in the voltage or current supplied to a subpixel and/or the brightness of the light-emitting material in that subpixel.


Fixed initial color points of the subpixels may be used to calculate the brightness shares of the subpixels in each subpixel. Then during operation of the display, a correction unit determines a correction factor for each subpixel, e.g., by use of a lookup table. In FIG. 1, the initial subpixel color points and the video input signal for the display are supplied to an initial brightness share calculation unit 10, which determines the brightness shares for the red, green blue and white subpixels. These brightness shares are then adjusted by respective values ΔR, ΔG, ΔB and ΔW derived from a signal ΔWOLED that represents the aging of the white subpixel. The adjusted brightness shares are sent to a compensation unit 11, which adjusts the video signal according to the adjusted brightness shares and sends the adjusted video signals to a driver 12 coupled to an OLED display 13. The driver 12 generates the signals that energize the various subpixels in the display 13 to produce the desired luminance from each subpixel.


Different standards exist for characterizing colors. One example is the 1931 CIE standard, which characterizes colors by a luminance (brightness) parameter and two color coordinates x and y. The coordinates x and y specify a point on a CIE chromatacity diagram, as illustrated in FIG. 2, which represents the mapping of human color perception in terms of the two CIE parameters x and y. The colors that can be matched by combining a given set of three primary colors, such as red, green and blue, are represented in FIG. 2 by the triangle T that joins the coordinates for the three colors, within the CIE chromaticity diagram of FIG. 2.



FIG. 3 is a flow chart of a procedure for determining the brightness shares for the subpixels in an RGBW display from initial subpixel color points and the video input signal for the image to be displayed, which are the two inputs to the initial brightness share calculation unit 10 in FIG. 1. The procedure of FIG. 3 begins at step 101 by choosing two subpixels from the red, green and blue subpixels, such that the desired display white point is inside a triangle that can be formed with the color points of the two selected subpixels and the white subpixel. For example, the triangle T in FIG. 2 is defined by the red, green and white subpixel values from the following set of chromaticity coordinates of four RGBW subpixels and a display white point:

    • Blue subpixel=[0.154, 0.149]
    • Red subpixel=[0.67, 0.34]
    • Green subpixel=[0.29, 0.605]
    • White subpixel=[0.29, 0.31]
    • Display white point =[0.3138, 0.331]
    • It can be seen that the display white point falls inside the triangle T formed by connecting the chromaticity coordinates of the red, green and white subpixels.


After choosing two subpixels at step 101, it is assumed that the white subpixel is the third primary color, and then at step 102 the chromaticity coordinates of the red, green and blue subpixels (considering the blue and white subpixels to be the same at this stage) are converted to tristimulus parameters to facilitate calculation of the brightness shares of the red, green and blue subpixels to achieve the desired display white point. Any color on a CIE chromaticity diagram can be considered to be a mixture of three CIE primaries, which can be specified by three numbers X, Y and Z called tristimulus values. The tristimulus values X, Y and Z uniquely represent a perceivable hue, and different combinations of light wavelengths that give the same set of tristimulus values are indistinguishable to the human eye. Converting the chromaticity coordinates to tristimulus values permits the use of linear algebra to calculate a set of brightness shares for the red, green and blue subpixels to achieve the desired display white point.


Step 103 uses the tristimulus values to calculate the brightness shares for the red, green and blue subpixels to achieve the desired display white point. For the exemplary set of chromaticity coordinates and desired display white point set forth above, the brightness shares of the red, green and blue subpixels are BRW=6.43%, BGW=11.85% and BWW=81.72%, respectively. The same calculation can be used to calculate the brightness shares BR, BG and BB for the red, green and blue subpixels in an RGB display.


Step 104 assigns to the white subpixel the brightness share calculated for the blue subpixel, and these brightness shares will produce the desired display white point in an RGBW system. Video signals, however, are typically based on an RGB system, so step 105 converts the video signals Rrgb, Grgb and Brgb to modified RGBW values Wm, Rm, Gm and Bm by setting Wm equal to the minimum of Rrgb, Grgb and Brgb and subtracting the white portion of the red, green and blue pixels from the values of the signals Rrgb, Grgb and Brgb, as follows:

Wm=minimum of Rrgb, Grgb and Brgb
Rm=Rrgb−W
Gm=Grgb−W
Bm=Brgb−W


Step 106 then uses the calculated brightness shares for BRW, BGW and BWW to translate the modified values Wm, Rm, Gm, and Bm to actual values W, R, G and B for the four RGBW subpixels, as follows:

W=Wm*BWW
R=Rm+Wm*BRW/BR
G=Gm+Wm*BGW/BG
B=Bm+Wm*BBW/BB


The values W, G, R and B are the gray scales for the white, green, red and blue subpixels w, r, g, and b.



FIGS. 4A and 4B are graphs plotted from actual measurements of the brightness of two white OLEDs while being aged by passing constant currents through the OLEDs. The currents supplied to the two OLEDs were different, to simulate two different stress conditions #1 and #2, as indicated in FIGS. 4A and 4B, As the OLED material ages, the resistance of the OLED increases, and thus the voltage required to maintain a constant current through the OLED increases. For the curves of FIGS. 4A and 4B, the voltage applied to each aging OLED to maintain a constant current was measured at successive intervals and compared with the voltage measured across a non-aged reference OLED supplied with the same magnitude of current and subjected to the same ambient conditions as the aging OLED.


The numbers on the horizontal axes of FIGS. 4A and 4B represent ΔVOLED, which is the difference between the voltages measured for the aging OLED and the corresponding reference LED. The numbers on the vertical axes of FIGS. 4A and 4B represent the respective chromaticity coordinates Cx and Cy of the measured brightness values of the aging white OLEDs.


In order to compensate for the brightness degradation of a white subpixel as the white subpixel ages, the brightness shares of the red, green and blue subpixels can be to be adjusted to BRW=7.62%, BGW=8.92% and BWW=83.46%, respectively, at ΔVOLED=0.2; to BRW=8.82%, BGW=5.95% and BWW=85.23%, respectively, at ΔVOLED=0.4; and to BRW=10.03%, BGW=2.96% and BWW=87.01%, respectively, at ΔVOLED=0.6. These adjustments in the brightness shares of the subpixels are used in the compensation unit 11 to provide compensated video signals to the driver 12 that drives successive sets of subpixels in the display 13.



FIG. 6 illustrates a compensation system using OLED data extracted from a display 200 (in the form of either OLED voltage, OLED current, or OLED luminance) and corrects for color shifts. This system can be used for dynamic brightness share calculations in which the chromaticity coordinates of the subpixels do not remain fixed, but rather are adjusted from time to time to compensate for changes in the color point of each subpixel over time. These calculations can be done in advance and put into a lookup table.



FIG. 6 illustrates a system in which OLED data, such as OLED voltage, OLED current or OLED luminance, is extracted from an OLED display 200 and used to compensate for color shifts as the OLEDs age, to maintain a substantially constant display white point over time. A display measurement unit 201 measures both OLED data 202 and backplane data 203, and the backplane data 203 is sent to a compensation unit 206 for use in compensating for aging of backplane components such as drive transistors. The OLED data 202 is sent to a subpixel color point unit 204, a subpixel efficiency unit 205 and a compensation unit 206. The subpixel color point unit determines new color points for the individual subpixels based on the OLED data (e.g., by using a lookup table), and the new color points are sent to a subpixel brightness share calculation unit 207, which also receives the video input signal for the display. The brightness shares may be calculated in the same manner, described above, and are then used in the compensation unit 206 to make compensating adjustments in the signals supplied to the four subpixels in each pixel. Lookup tables can be used for a simpler implementation, and lookup tables for the color points and the color shares can even be merged into a single lookup table.


To compensate for the optical aging of the individual subpixels, the gray scales may be adjusted using the following value ΔVCL_W as the compensating adjustment for the white pixels:







Δ






V
CL_W


=



G
mW



(
W
)


·

K
CL_W







where







G
mW



(
W
)


=





v




1

pixel





w




(
W
)






KCL_W is a brightness correction factor for the white subpixels and may be determined from the empirically derived interdependency curves shown in FIG. 4 that relate OLED color shift to ΔVOLED. That measured data can be used to generate the graph of FIG. 5, which plots the brightness correction factor KCL_W as a function of ΔVOLED for a white pixel. Then assuming that any color shifts in the red, green and blue OLEDs are negligible, brightness correction factors Kb, Kr and Kg are computed from the KCL_W curve, using the same brightness shares for red, green and blue described above. The compensating adjustments for the red, green and blue OLEDs can then be calculated as follows:

ΔR=Kr(R)*ΔVCL_W
ΔG=Kg(G)*ΔVCL_W
ΔB=Kb(B)*ΔVCL_W


The final adjusted values of the gray scales for the red, green and blue OLEDs are calculated by adding the above values ΔR, ΔG and ΔB to the values derived from the original gray-scale values.


While particular embodiments, aspects, and applications of the present invention have been illustrated and described, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the precise construction and compositions disclosed herein and that various modifications, changes, and variations may be apparent from the foregoing descriptions without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method of maintaining a substantially constant display white point over an extended period of operation of a color display formed by an array of multiple pixels, each of said pixels including multiple subpixels having different colors and white, and each of said subpixels including a light emissive device, said method comprising receiving a video signal,controlling the color of a selected pixel by adjusting relative levels of energization of the subpixels in the selected pixel based on the video signal,determining a color shift degradation behavior based on aging of a white subpixel in the selected pixel, andre-adjusting the relative levels of energization of at least one of the color subpixels in the selected pixel to adjust brightness shares of said subpixels in said selected pixel to compensate for said color shift degradation, due to aging, of said white subpixel independently of other pixels in said array and based on said determined color shift degradation behavior of said white subpixel based on aging, said brightness shares being adjusted to maintain a substantially constant display white point.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 in which said color shift degradation behavior is a shift in the chromaticity coordinates of the said white subpixel.
  • 3. The method of claim 2 in which said brightness shares of said subpixels are adjusted by respective values ΔR, ΔG, ΔB, and ΔW derived from a signal ΔWOLED that represents the aging of the white subpixel, wherein ΔR, ΔG, ΔB, and ΔW are the adjustment values for red, green, blue and white subpixels in said selected pixel.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 in which said light emissive device in each subpixel is an OLED.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 in which said display is an RGBW display.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 in which said color shift degradation behavior based on aging is detected by measuring a voltage across said light emissive device in said white subpixel, and in which said color shift degradation behavior is related to the voltage across said light emissive device by an empirically determined dependency curve.
  • 7. The method of claim 1 which includes determining a shift in the chromaticity coordinates of the said white subpixel in the selected pixel as said white subpixel ages.
  • 8. A system for maintaining a substantially constant display white point over an extended period of operation of a color display, said system comprising a color display formed by an array of multiple pixels, each of said pixels including multiple subpixels having different colors and white and each of said subpixels including a light emissive device,drive circuitry for energizing the subpixels of a selected pixel and controlling the color of each selected pixel by adjusting relative levels of energization of the subpixels in the selected pixel based on a video signal, anda controller monitoring a color shift degradation behavior based on aging of a white subpixel in the selected pixel and re-adjusting the relative levels of energization of at least one of the color subpixels in the selected pixel to adjust brightness shares of said subpixels in said selected pixel to compensate for said color shift degradation, due to aging, of said white subpixel independently of other pixels in said array and based on said determined color shift degradation behavior of said white subpixel based on aging, said brightness shares being adjusted to maintain a substantially constant display white point.
  • 9. The system of claim 8 in which said color shift degradation behavior is a shift in the chromaticity coordinates of the said white subpixel.
  • 10. The system of claim 9 in which the controller adjusts the brightness shares of said subpixels by respective values of ΔR, ΔG, ΔB, and ΔW derived from a signal ΔWOLED that represents the aging of the white subpixel, wherein ΔR, ΔG, ΔB, and ΔW are the adjustment values for red, green, blue and white subpixels in said selected pixel.
  • 11. The system of claim 8 in which said light emissive device in each subpixel is an OLED.
  • 12. The system of claim 8 in which said display is an RGBW display.
  • 13. The system of claim 8 in which said color shift degradation behavior is detected by measuring a voltage across said light emissive device in said white subpixel, and in which said color shift degradation behavior based on aging is related to the voltage across said light emissive device by an empirically determined dependency curve.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
2669367 Jun 2009 CA national
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to and is a continuation of U.S. patent application No. 13/844,856, filed Mar. 16, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application No. 12/816,856, filed Jun. 16, 2010, which claims priority to Canadian Application No. 2,669,367 which was filed Jun. 16, 2009, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.

US Referenced Citations (517)
Number Name Date Kind
3506851 Polkinghorn Apr 1970 A
3774055 Bapat Nov 1973 A
4090096 Nagami May 1978 A
4160934 Kirsch Jul 1979 A
4354162 Wright Oct 1982 A
4943956 Noro Jul 1990 A
4996523 Bell Feb 1991 A
5153420 Hack Oct 1992 A
5198803 Shie Mar 1993 A
5204661 Hack Apr 1993 A
5266515 Robb Nov 1993 A
5489918 Mosier Feb 1996 A
5498880 Lee Mar 1996 A
5557342 Eto Sep 1996 A
5572444 Lentz Nov 1996 A
5589847 Lewis Dec 1996 A
5619033 Weisfield Apr 1997 A
5648276 Hara Jul 1997 A
5670973 Bassetti Sep 1997 A
5684365 Tang Nov 1997 A
5691783 Numao Nov 1997 A
5714968 Ikeda Feb 1998 A
5723950 Wei Mar 1998 A
5744824 Kousai Apr 1998 A
5745660 Kolpatzik Apr 1998 A
5748160 Shieh May 1998 A
5815303 Berlin Sep 1998 A
5870071 Kawahata Feb 1999 A
5874803 Garbuzov Feb 1999 A
5880582 Sawada Mar 1999 A
5903248 Irwin May 1999 A
5917280 Burrows Jun 1999 A
5923794 McGrath Jul 1999 A
5945972 Okumura Aug 1999 A
5949398 Kim Sep 1999 A
5952789 Stewart Sep 1999 A
5952991 Akiyama Sep 1999 A
5982104 Sasaki Nov 1999 A
5990629 Yamada Nov 1999 A
6023259 Howard Feb 2000 A
6069365 Chow May 2000 A
6091203 Kawashima Jul 2000 A
6097360 Holloman Aug 2000 A
6144222 Ho Nov 2000 A
6177915 Beeteson Jan 2001 B1
6229506 Dawson May 2001 B1
6229508 Kane May 2001 B1
6246180 Nishigaki Jun 2001 B1
6252248 Sano Jun 2001 B1
6259424 Kurogane Jul 2001 B1
6262589 Tamukai Jul 2001 B1
6271825 Greene Aug 2001 B1
6288696 Holloman Sep 2001 B1
6304039 Appelberg Oct 2001 B1
6307322 Dawson Oct 2001 B1
6310962 Chung Oct 2001 B1
6320325 Cok Nov 2001 B1
6323631 Juang Nov 2001 B1
6356029 Hunter Mar 2002 B1
6373454 Knapp Apr 2002 B1
6392617 Gleason May 2002 B1
6404139 Sasaki et al. Jun 2002 B1
6414661 Shen Jul 2002 B1
6417825 Stewart Jul 2002 B1
6433488 Bu Aug 2002 B1
6437106 Stoner Aug 2002 B1
6445369 Yang Sep 2002 B1
6475845 Kimura Nov 2002 B2
6501098 Yamazaki Dec 2002 B2
6501466 Yamagishi Dec 2002 B1
6518962 Kimura Feb 2003 B2
6522315 Ozawa Feb 2003 B2
6525683 Gu Feb 2003 B1
6531827 Kawashima Mar 2003 B2
6542138 Shannon Apr 2003 B1
6555420 Yamazaki Apr 2003 B1
6580408 Bae Jun 2003 B1
6580657 Sanford Jun 2003 B2
6583398 Harkin Jun 2003 B2
6583775 Sekiya Jun 2003 B1
6594606 Everitt Jul 2003 B2
6618030 Kane Sep 2003 B2
6639244 Yamazaki Oct 2003 B1
6668645 Gilmour Dec 2003 B1
6677713 Sung Jan 2004 B1
6680580 Sung Jan 2004 B1
6687266 Ma Feb 2004 B1
6690000 Muramatsu Feb 2004 B1
6690344 Takeuchi Feb 2004 B1
6693388 Oomura Feb 2004 B2
6693610 Shannon Feb 2004 B2
6697057 Koyama Feb 2004 B2
6720942 Lee Apr 2004 B2
6724151 Yoo Apr 2004 B2
6734636 Sanford May 2004 B2
6738034 Kaneko May 2004 B2
6738035 Fan May 2004 B1
6753655 Shih Jun 2004 B2
6753834 Mikami Jun 2004 B2
6756741 Li Jun 2004 B2
6756952 Decaux Jun 2004 B1
6756958 Furuhashi Jun 2004 B2
6771028 Winters Aug 2004 B1
6777712 Sanford Aug 2004 B2
6777888 Kondo Aug 2004 B2
6781567 Kimura Aug 2004 B2
6806497 Jo Oct 2004 B2
6806638 Lih et al. Oct 2004 B2
6806857 Sempel Oct 2004 B2
6809706 Shimoda Oct 2004 B2
6815975 Nara Nov 2004 B2
6828950 Koyama Dec 2004 B2
6853371 Miyajima Feb 2005 B2
6859193 Yumoto Feb 2005 B1
6873117 Ishizuka Mar 2005 B2
6876346 Anzai Apr 2005 B2
6885356 Hashimoto Apr 2005 B2
6900485 Lee May 2005 B2
6903734 Eu Jun 2005 B2
6909243 Inukai Jun 2005 B2
6909419 Zavracky Jun 2005 B2
6911960 Yokoyama Jun 2005 B1
6911964 Lee Jun 2005 B2
6914448 Jinno Jul 2005 B2
6919871 Kwon Jul 2005 B2
6924602 Komiya Aug 2005 B2
6937215 Lo Aug 2005 B2
6937220 Kitaura Aug 2005 B2
6940214 Komiya Sep 2005 B1
6943500 LeChevalier Sep 2005 B2
6947022 McCartney Sep 2005 B2
6954194 Matsumoto Oct 2005 B2
6956547 Bae Oct 2005 B2
6975142 Azami Dec 2005 B2
6975332 Arnold Dec 2005 B2
6995510 Murakami Feb 2006 B2
6995519 Arnold Feb 2006 B2
7023408 Chen Apr 2006 B2
7027015 Booth, Jr. Apr 2006 B2
7027078 Reihl Apr 2006 B2
7034793 Sekiya Apr 2006 B2
7038392 Libsch May 2006 B2
7057359 Hung Jun 2006 B2
7061451 Kimura Jun 2006 B2
7064733 Cok Jun 2006 B2
7071932 Libsch Jul 2006 B2
7088051 Cok Aug 2006 B1
7088052 Kimura Aug 2006 B2
7102378 Kuo Sep 2006 B2
7106285 Naugler Sep 2006 B2
7112820 Change Sep 2006 B2
7116058 Lo Oct 2006 B2
7119493 Fryer Oct 2006 B2
7122835 Ikeda Oct 2006 B1
7127380 Iverson Oct 2006 B1
7129914 Knapp Oct 2006 B2
7161566 Cok Jan 2007 B2
7164417 Cok Jan 2007 B2
7193589 Yoshida Mar 2007 B2
7224332 Cok May 2007 B2
7227519 Kawase Jun 2007 B1
7245277 Ishizuka Jul 2007 B2
7248236 Nathan Jul 2007 B2
7262753 Tanghe Aug 2007 B2
7274363 Ishizuka Sep 2007 B2
7310092 Imamura Dec 2007 B2
7315295 Kimura Jan 2008 B2
7321348 Cok Jan 2008 B2
7339560 Sun Mar 2008 B2
7355574 Leon Apr 2008 B1
7358941 Ono Apr 2008 B2
7368868 Sakamoto May 2008 B2
7397485 Miller Jul 2008 B2
7411571 Huh Aug 2008 B2
7414600 Nathan Aug 2008 B2
7423617 Giraldo Sep 2008 B2
7453054 Lee Nov 2008 B2
7474285 Kimura Jan 2009 B2
7502000 Yuki Mar 2009 B2
7528812 Tsuge May 2009 B2
7535449 Miyazawa May 2009 B2
7554512 Steer Jun 2009 B2
7569849 Nathan Aug 2009 B2
7576718 Miyazawa Aug 2009 B2
7580012 Kim Aug 2009 B2
7589707 Chou Sep 2009 B2
7609239 Chang Oct 2009 B2
7619594 Hu Nov 2009 B2
7619597 Nathan Nov 2009 B2
7633470 Kane Dec 2009 B2
7656370 Schneider Feb 2010 B2
7675485 Steer Mar 2010 B2
7800558 Routley Sep 2010 B2
7847764 Cok Dec 2010 B2
7859492 Kohno Dec 2010 B2
7868859 Tomida Jan 2011 B2
7876294 Sasaki Jan 2011 B2
7924249 Nathan Apr 2011 B2
7932883 Klompenhouwer Apr 2011 B2
7969390 Yoshida Jun 2011 B2
7978187 Nathan Jul 2011 B2
7994712 Sung Aug 2011 B2
8026876 Nathan Sep 2011 B2
8049420 Tamura Nov 2011 B2
8077123 Naugler, Jr. Dec 2011 B2
8115707 Nathan Feb 2012 B2
8208084 Lin Jun 2012 B2
8223177 Nathan Jul 2012 B2
8232939 Nathan Jul 2012 B2
8259044 Nathan Sep 2012 B2
8264431 Bulovic Sep 2012 B2
8279143 Nathan Oct 2012 B2
8339386 Leon Dec 2012 B2
8441206 Myers May 2013 B2
8493296 Ogawa Jul 2013 B2
20010002703 Koyama Jun 2001 A1
20010009283 Arao Jul 2001 A1
20010024181 Kubota Sep 2001 A1
20010024186 Kane Sep 2001 A1
20010026257 Kimura Oct 2001 A1
20010030323 Ikeda Oct 2001 A1
20010035863 Kimura Nov 2001 A1
20010038367 Inukai Nov 2001 A1
20010040541 Yoneda Nov 2001 A1
20010043173 Troutman Nov 2001 A1
20010045929 Prache Nov 2001 A1
20010052606 Sempel Dec 2001 A1
20010052940 Hagihara Dec 2001 A1
20020000576 Inukai Jan 2002 A1
20020011796 Koyama Jan 2002 A1
20020011799 Kimura Jan 2002 A1
20020012057 Kimura Jan 2002 A1
20020014851 Tai Feb 2002 A1
20020018034 Ohki Feb 2002 A1
20020030190 Ohtani Mar 2002 A1
20020047565 Nara Apr 2002 A1
20020052086 Maeda May 2002 A1
20020067134 Kawashima Jun 2002 A1
20020084463 Sanford Jul 2002 A1
20020101152 Kimura Aug 2002 A1
20020101172 Bu Aug 2002 A1
20020105279 Kimura Aug 2002 A1
20020117722 Osada Aug 2002 A1
20020122308 Ikeda Sep 2002 A1
20020158587 Komiya Oct 2002 A1
20020158666 Azami Oct 2002 A1
20020158823 Zavracky Oct 2002 A1
20020167471 Everitt Nov 2002 A1
20020167474 Everitt Nov 2002 A1
20020180369 Koyama Dec 2002 A1
20020180721 Kimura Dec 2002 A1
20020181276 Yamazaki Dec 2002 A1
20020186214 Siwinski Dec 2002 A1
20020190924 Asano Dec 2002 A1
20020190971 Nakamura Dec 2002 A1
20020195967 Kim Dec 2002 A1
20020195968 Sanford Dec 2002 A1
20030020413 Oomura Jan 2003 A1
20030030603 Shimoda Feb 2003 A1
20030043088 Booth Mar 2003 A1
20030057895 Kimura Mar 2003 A1
20030058226 Bertram Mar 2003 A1
20030062524 Kimura Apr 2003 A1
20030063081 Kimura Apr 2003 A1
20030071821 Sundahl Apr 2003 A1
20030076048 Rutherford Apr 2003 A1
20030090447 Kimura May 2003 A1
20030090481 Kimura May 2003 A1
20030107560 Yumoto Jun 2003 A1
20030111966 Mikami Jun 2003 A1
20030122745 Miyazawa Jul 2003 A1
20030122813 Ishizuki Jul 2003 A1
20030142088 LeChevalier Jul 2003 A1
20030151569 Lee et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030156101 Le Chevalier Aug 2003 A1
20030174152 Noguchi Sep 2003 A1
20030179626 Sanford Sep 2003 A1
20030185438 Osawa Oct 2003 A1
20030197663 Lee Oct 2003 A1
20030210256 Mori Nov 2003 A1
20030230141 Gilmour Dec 2003 A1
20030230980 Forrest Dec 2003 A1
20030231148 Lin Dec 2003 A1
20040032382 Cok Feb 2004 A1
20040041750 Abe Mar 2004 A1
20040066357 Kawasaki Apr 2004 A1
20040070557 Asano Apr 2004 A1
20040070565 Nayar Apr 2004 A1
20040090186 Kanauchi May 2004 A1
20040090400 Yoo May 2004 A1
20040095297 Libsch May 2004 A1
20040100427 Miyazawa May 2004 A1
20040108518 Jo Jun 2004 A1
20040135749 Kondakov Jul 2004 A1
20040140982 Pate Jul 2004 A1
20040145547 Oh Jul 2004 A1
20040150592 Mizukoshi Aug 2004 A1
20040150594 Koyama Aug 2004 A1
20040150595 Kasai Aug 2004 A1
20040155841 Kasai Aug 2004 A1
20040174347 Sun Sep 2004 A1
20040174349 Libsch Sep 2004 A1
20040174354 Ono Sep 2004 A1
20040178743 Miller Sep 2004 A1
20040183759 Stevenson Sep 2004 A1
20040196275 Hattori Oct 2004 A1
20040207615 Yumoto Oct 2004 A1
20040227697 Mori Nov 2004 A1
20040233125 Tanghe Nov 2004 A1
20040239596 Ono Dec 2004 A1
20040252089 Ono Dec 2004 A1
20040257313 Kawashima Dec 2004 A1
20040257353 Imamura Dec 2004 A1
20040257355 Naugler Dec 2004 A1
20040263437 Hattori Dec 2004 A1
20040263444 Kimura Dec 2004 A1
20040263445 Inukai Dec 2004 A1
20040263541 Takeuchi Dec 2004 A1
20050007355 Miura Jan 2005 A1
20050007357 Yamashita Jan 2005 A1
20050007392 Kasai Jan 2005 A1
20050017650 Fryer Jan 2005 A1
20050024081 Kuo Feb 2005 A1
20050024393 Kondo Feb 2005 A1
20050030267 Tanghe Feb 2005 A1
20050057484 Diefenbaugh Mar 2005 A1
20050057580 Yamano Mar 2005 A1
20050067970 Libsch Mar 2005 A1
20050067971 Kane Mar 2005 A1
20050068270 Awakura Mar 2005 A1
20050068275 Kane Mar 2005 A1
20050073264 Matsumoto Apr 2005 A1
20050083323 Suzuki Apr 2005 A1
20050088103 Kageyama Apr 2005 A1
20050110420 Arnold May 2005 A1
20050110807 Chang May 2005 A1
20050122294 Ben-David Jun 2005 A1
20050140598 Kim Jun 2005 A1
20050140610 Smith Jun 2005 A1
20050145891 Abe Jul 2005 A1
20050156831 Yamazaki Jul 2005 A1
20050162079 Sakamoto Jul 2005 A1
20050168416 Hashimoto Aug 2005 A1
20050179626 Yuki Aug 2005 A1
20050179628 Kimura Aug 2005 A1
20050185200 Tobol Aug 2005 A1
20050200575 Kim Sep 2005 A1
20050206590 Sasaki Sep 2005 A1
20050212787 Noguchi Sep 2005 A1
20050219184 Zehner Oct 2005 A1
20050225683 Nozawa Oct 2005 A1
20050248515 Naugler Nov 2005 A1
20050269959 Uchino Dec 2005 A1
20050269960 Ono Dec 2005 A1
20050280615 Cok Dec 2005 A1
20050280766 Johnson Dec 2005 A1
20050285822 Reddy Dec 2005 A1
20050285825 Eom Dec 2005 A1
20060001613 Routley Jan 2006 A1
20060007072 Choi Jan 2006 A1
20060007249 Reddy Jan 2006 A1
20060012310 Chen Jan 2006 A1
20060012311 Ogawa Jan 2006 A1
20060015272 Giraldo et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060022305 Yamashita Feb 2006 A1
20060027807 Nathan Feb 2006 A1
20060030084 Young Feb 2006 A1
20060038758 Routley Feb 2006 A1
20060038762 Chou Feb 2006 A1
20060044227 Hadcock Mar 2006 A1
20060066533 Sato Mar 2006 A1
20060077135 Cok Apr 2006 A1
20060077142 Kwon Apr 2006 A1
20060082523 Guo Apr 2006 A1
20060092185 Jo May 2006 A1
20060097628 Suh May 2006 A1
20060097631 Lee May 2006 A1
20060103611 Choi May 2006 A1
20060125740 Shirasaki et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060149493 Sambandan Jul 2006 A1
20060170623 Naugler, Jr. Aug 2006 A1
20060176250 Nathan Aug 2006 A1
20060208961 Nathan Sep 2006 A1
20060208971 Deane Sep 2006 A1
20060214888 Schneider Sep 2006 A1
20060231740 Kasai Oct 2006 A1
20060232522 Roy Oct 2006 A1
20060244697 Lee Nov 2006 A1
20060261841 Fish Nov 2006 A1
20060273997 Nathan Dec 2006 A1
20060279481 Haruna Dec 2006 A1
20060284801 Yoon Dec 2006 A1
20060284802 Kohno Dec 2006 A1
20060284895 Marcu Dec 2006 A1
20060290618 Goto Dec 2006 A1
20070001937 Park Jan 2007 A1
20070001939 Hashimoto Jan 2007 A1
20070008251 Kohno Jan 2007 A1
20070008268 Park Jan 2007 A1
20070008297 Bassetti Jan 2007 A1
20070057873 Uchino Mar 2007 A1
20070057874 Le Roy Mar 2007 A1
20070069998 Naugler Mar 2007 A1
20070075727 Nakano Apr 2007 A1
20070076226 Klompenhouwer Apr 2007 A1
20070080905 Takahara Apr 2007 A1
20070080906 Tanabe Apr 2007 A1
20070080908 Nathan Apr 2007 A1
20070097038 Yamazaki May 2007 A1
20070097041 Park May 2007 A1
20070103411 Cok et al. May 2007 A1
20070103419 Uchino May 2007 A1
20070115221 Buchhauser May 2007 A1
20070126672 Tada et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070164664 Ludwicki Jul 2007 A1
20070164938 Shin Jul 2007 A1
20070182671 Nathan Aug 2007 A1
20070236134 Ho Oct 2007 A1
20070236440 Wacyk Oct 2007 A1
20070236517 Kimpe Oct 2007 A1
20070241999 Lin Oct 2007 A1
20070273294 Nagayama Nov 2007 A1
20070285359 Ono Dec 2007 A1
20070290957 Cok Dec 2007 A1
20070290958 Cok Dec 2007 A1
20070296672 Kim Dec 2007 A1
20080001525 Chao Jan 2008 A1
20080001544 Murakami Jan 2008 A1
20080030518 Higgins Feb 2008 A1
20080036706 Kitazawa Feb 2008 A1
20080036708 Shirasaki Feb 2008 A1
20080042942 Takahashi Feb 2008 A1
20080042948 Yamashita Feb 2008 A1
20080048951 Naugler, Jr. Feb 2008 A1
20080055209 Cok Mar 2008 A1
20080055211 Ogawa Mar 2008 A1
20080074413 Ogura Mar 2008 A1
20080088549 Nathan Apr 2008 A1
20080088648 Nathan Apr 2008 A1
20080111766 Uchino May 2008 A1
20080116787 Hsu May 2008 A1
20080117144 Nakano et al. May 2008 A1
20080136770 Peker et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080150845 Ishii Jun 2008 A1
20080150847 Kim Jun 2008 A1
20080158115 Cordes Jul 2008 A1
20080158648 Cummings Jul 2008 A1
20080191976 Nathan Aug 2008 A1
20080198103 Toyomura Aug 2008 A1
20080211749 Weitbruch Sep 2008 A1
20080231558 Naugler Sep 2008 A1
20080231562 Kwon Sep 2008 A1
20080231625 Minami Sep 2008 A1
20080246713 Lee Oct 2008 A1
20080252223 Toyoda Oct 2008 A1
20080252571 Hente Oct 2008 A1
20080259020 Fisekovic Oct 2008 A1
20080290805 Yamada Nov 2008 A1
20080297055 Miyake Dec 2008 A1
20090058772 Lee Mar 2009 A1
20090109142 Takahara Apr 2009 A1
20090121994 Miyata May 2009 A1
20090146926 Sung Jun 2009 A1
20090160743 Tomida Jun 2009 A1
20090174628 Wang Jul 2009 A1
20090184901 Kwon Jul 2009 A1
20090195483 Naugler, Jr. Aug 2009 A1
20090201281 Routley Aug 2009 A1
20090206764 Schemmann Aug 2009 A1
20090213046 Nam Aug 2009 A1
20090244046 Seto Oct 2009 A1
20090262047 Yamashita Oct 2009 A1
20100004891 Ahlers Jan 2010 A1
20100026725 Smith Feb 2010 A1
20100039422 Seto Feb 2010 A1
20100039458 Nathan Feb 2010 A1
20100060911 Marcu Mar 2010 A1
20100079419 Shibusawa Apr 2010 A1
20100085282 Yu Apr 2010 A1
20100103160 Jeon Apr 2010 A1
20100165002 Ahn Jul 2010 A1
20100194670 Cok Aug 2010 A1
20100207960 Kimpe Aug 2010 A1
20100225630 Levey Sep 2010 A1
20100251295 Amento Sep 2010 A1
20100277400 Jeong Nov 2010 A1
20100315319 Cok Dec 2010 A1
20110050870 Hanari Mar 2011 A1
20110063197 Chung Mar 2011 A1
20110069051 Nakamura Mar 2011 A1
20110069089 Kopf Mar 2011 A1
20110069096 Li Mar 2011 A1
20110074750 Leon Mar 2011 A1
20110149166 Botzas Jun 2011 A1
20110169798 Lee Jul 2011 A1
20110175895 Hayakawa Jul 2011 A1
20110181630 Smith Jul 2011 A1
20110199395 Nathan Aug 2011 A1
20110227964 Chaji Sep 2011 A1
20110242074 Bert et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110273399 Lee Nov 2011 A1
20110292006 Kim Dec 2011 A1
20110293480 Mueller Dec 2011 A1
20120056558 Toshiya Mar 2012 A1
20120062565 Fuchs Mar 2012 A1
20120262184 Shen Oct 2012 A1
20120299970 Bae Nov 2012 A1
20120299978 Chaji Nov 2012 A1
20130027381 Nathan Jan 2013 A1
20130057595 Nathan Mar 2013 A1
20130112960 Chaji May 2013 A1
20130135272 Park May 2013 A1
20130162617 Yoon Jun 2013 A1
20130201223 Li et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130309821 Yoo Nov 2013 A1
20130321671 Cote Dec 2013 A1
20140111567 Nathan et al. Apr 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (127)
Number Date Country
1 294 034 Jan 1992 CA
2 109 951 Nov 1992 CA
2 249 592 Jul 1998 CA
2 368 386 Sep 1999 CA
2 242 720 Jan 2000 CA
2 354 018 Jun 2000 CA
2 432 530 Jul 2002 CA
2 436 451 Aug 2002 CA
2 438 577 Aug 2002 CA
2 463 653 Jan 2004 CA
2 498 136 Mar 2004 CA
2 522 396 Nov 2004 CA
2 443 206 Mar 2005 CA
2 472 671 Dec 2005 CA
2 567 076 Jan 2006 CA
2 526 782 Apr 2006 CA
2 541 531 Jul 2006 CA
2 550 102 Apr 2008 CA
2 773 699 Oct 2013 CA
1381032 Nov 2002 CN
1448908 Oct 2003 CN
1682267 Oct 2005 CN
1760945 Apr 2006 CN
102656621 Sep 2012 CN
0 158 366 Oct 1985 EP
1 028 471 Aug 2000 EP
1 111 577 Jun 2001 EP
1 130 565 Sep 2001 EP
1 194 013 Apr 2002 EP
1 335 430 Aug 2003 EP
1 372 136 Dec 2003 EP
1 381 019 Jan 2004 EP
1 418 566 May 2004 EP
1 429 312 Jun 2004 EP
145 0341 Aug 2004 EP
1 465 143 Oct 2004 EP
1 469 448 Oct 2004 EP
1 521 203 Apr 2005 EP
1 594 347 Nov 2005 EP
1 784 055 May 2007 EP
1854338 Nov 2007 EP
1 879 169 Jan 2008 EP
1 879 172 Jan 2008 EP
2395499 Dec 2011 EP
2 389 951 Dec 2003 GB
1272298 Oct 1989 JP
4-042619 Feb 1992 JP
6-314977 Nov 1994 JP
8-340243 Dec 1996 JP
09-090405 Apr 1997 JP
10-254410 Sep 1998 JP
11-202295 Jul 1999 JP
11-219146 Aug 1999 JP
11 231805 Aug 1999 JP
11-282419 Oct 1999 JP
2000-056847 Feb 2000 JP
2000-81607 Mar 2000 JP
2001-134217 May 2001 JP
2001-195014 Jul 2001 JP
2002-055654 Feb 2002 JP
2002-91376 Mar 2002 JP
2002-514320 May 2002 JP
2002-229513 Aug 2002 JP
2002-278513 Sep 2002 JP
2002-333862 Nov 2002 JP
2003-076331 Mar 2003 JP
2003-124519 Apr 2003 JP
2003-177709 Jun 2003 JP
2003-271095 Sep 2003 JP
2003-308046 Oct 2003 JP
2003-317944 Nov 2003 JP
2004-004675 Jan 2004 JP
2004-045648 Feb 2004 JP
2004-145197 May 2004 JP
2004-287345 Oct 2004 JP
2005-057217 Mar 2005 JP
2007-065015 Mar 2007 JP
2008-102335 May 2008 JP
4-158570 Oct 2008 JP
2003-195813 Jul 2013 JP
2004-0100887 Dec 2004 KR
342486 Oct 1998 TW
473622 Jan 2002 TW
485337 May 2002 TW
502233 Sep 2002 TW
538650 Jun 2003 TW
1221268 Sep 2004 TW
200727247 Jul 2007 TW
WO 9848403 Oct 1998 WO
WO 9948079 Sep 1999 WO
WO 0106484 Jan 2001 WO
WO 0127910 Apr 2001 WO
WO 0163587 Aug 2001 WO
WO 02067327 Aug 2002 WO
WO 03001496 Jan 2003 WO
WO 03034389 Apr 2003 WO
WO 03058594 Jul 2003 WO
WO 03063124 Jul 2003 WO
WO 03077231 Sep 2003 WO
WO 2004003877 Jan 2004 WO
WO 2004025615 Mar 2004 WO
WO 2004034364 Apr 2004 WO
WO 2004047058 Jun 2004 WO
WO 2004104975 Dec 2004 WO
WO 2005022498 Mar 2005 WO
WO 2005022500 Mar 2005 WO
WO 2005029455 Mar 2005 WO
WO 2005029456 Mar 2005 WO
WO 2005055185 Jun 2005 WO
WO 2006000101 Jan 2006 WO
WO 2006053424 May 2006 WO
WO 2006063448 Jun 2006 WO
WO 2006084360 Aug 2006 WO
WO 2007003877 Jan 2007 WO
WO 2007079572 Jul 2007 WO
WO 2007120849 Oct 2007 WO
WO 2009048618 Apr 2009 WO
WO 2009055920 May 2009 WO
WO 2010023270 Mar 2010 WO
WO 2010146707 Dec 2010 WO
WO 2011041224 Apr 2011 WO
WO 2011064761 Jun 2011 WO
WO 2011067729 Jun 2011 WO
WO 2012160424 Nov 2012 WO
WO 2012160471 Nov 2012 WO
WO 2012164474 Dec 2012 WO
WO 2012164475 Dec 2012 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (125)
Entry
Ahnood : “Effect of threshold voltage instability on field effect mobility in thin film transistors deduced from constant current measurements”; dated Aug. 2009.
Alexander : “Pixel circuits and drive schemes for glass and elastic AMOLED displays”; dated Jul. 2005 (9 pages).
Alexander : “Unique Electrical Measurement Technology for Compensation, Inspection, and Process Diagnostics of AMOLED HDTV”; dated May 2010 (4 pages).
Ashtiani : “AMOLED Pixel Circuit With Electronic Compensation of Luminance Degradation”; dated Mar. 2007 (4 pages).
Chaji : “A Current-Mode Comparator for Digital Calibration of Amorphous Silicon AMOLED Displays”; dated Jul. 2008 (5 pages).
Chaji : “A fast settling current driver based on the CCII for AMOLED displays”; dated Dec. 2009 (6 pages).
Chaji : “A Low-Cost Stable Amorphous Silicon AMOLED Display with Full V˜T- and V˜O˜L˜E˜D Shift Compensation”; dated May 2007 (4 pages).
Chaji : “A low-power driving scheme for a-Si:H active-matrix organic light-emitting diode displays”; dated Jun. 2005 (4 pages).
Chaji : “A low-power high-performance digital circuit for deep submicron technologies”; dated Jun. 2005 (4 pages).
Chaji : “A novel a-Si:H AMOLED pixel circuit based on short-term stress stability of a-Si:H TFTs”; dated Oct. 2005 (3 pages).
Chaji : “A Novel Driving Scheme and Pixel Circuit for AMOLED Displays”; dated Jun. 2006 (4 pages).
Chaji : “A Novel Driving Scheme for High Resolution Large-area a-Si:H AMOLED displays”; dated Aug. 2005 (3 pages).
Chaji : “A Stable Voltage-Programmed Pixel Circuit for a-Si:H AMOLED Displays”; dated Dec. 2006 (12 pages).
Chaji : “A Sub-μA fast-settling current-programmed pixel circuit for AMOLED displays”; dated Sep. 2007.
Chaji : “An Enhanced and Simplified Optical Feedback Pixel Circuit for AMOLED Displays”; dated Oct. 2006.
Chaji : “Compensation technique for DC and transient instability of thin film transistor circuits for large-area devices”; dated Aug. 2008.
Chaji : “Driving scheme for stable operation of 2-TFT a-Si AMOLED pixel”; dated Apr. 2005 (2 pages).
Chaji : “Dynamic-effect compensating technique for stable a-Si:H AMOLED displays”; dated Aug. 2005 (4 pages).
Chaji : “Electrical Compensation of OLED Luminance Degradation”; dated Dec. 2007 (3 pages).
Chaji : “eUTDSP: a design study of a new VLIW-based DSP architecture”; dated My 2003 (4 pages).
Chaji : “Fast and Offset-Leakage Insensitive Current-Mode Line Driver for Active Matrix Displays and Sensors”; dated Feb. 2009 (8 pages).
Chaji : “High Speed Low Power Adder Design With a New Logic Style: Pseudo Dynamic Logic (SDL)”; dated Oct. 2001 (4 pages).
Chaji : “High-precision, fast current source for large-area current-programmed a-Si flat panels”; dated Sep. 2006 (4 pages).
Chaji : “Low-Cost AMOLED Television with IGNIS Compensating Technology”; dated May 2008 (4 pages).
Chaji : “Low-Cost Stable a-Si:H AMOLED Display for Portable Applications”; dated Jun. 2006 (4 pages).
Chaji : “Low-Power Low-Cost Voltage-Programmed a-Si:H AMOLED Display”; dated Jun. 2008 (5 pages).
Chaji : “Merged phototransistor pixel with enhanced near infrared response and flicker noise reduction for biomolecular imaging”; dated Nov. 2008 (3 pages).
Chaji : “Parallel Addressing Scheme for Voltage-Programmed Active-Matrix OLED Displays”; dated May 2007 (6 pages).
Chaji : “Pseudo dynamic logic (SDL): a high-speed and low-power dynamic logic family”; dated 2002 (4 pages).
Chaji : “Stable a-Si:H circuits based on short-term stress stability of amorphous silicon thin film transistors”; dated May 2006 (4 pages).
Chaji : “Stable Pixel Circuit for Small-Area High-Resolution a-Si:H AMOLED Displays”; dated Oct. 2008 (6 pages).
Chaji : “Stable RGBW AMOLED display with OLED degradation compensation using electrical feedback”; dated Feb. 2010 (2 pages).
Chaji : “Thin-Film Transistor Integration for Biomedical Imaging and AMOLED Displays”; dated 2008 (177 pages).
European Search Report for Application No. EP 04 78 6661 dated Mar. 9, 2009.
European Search Report for Application No. EP 05 75 9141 dated Oct. 30, 2009 (2 pages).
European Search Report for Application No. EP 05 81 9617 dated Jan. 30, 2009.
European Search Report for Application No. EP 06 70 5133 dated Jul. 18, 2008.
European Search Report for Application No. EP 06 72 1798 dated Nov. 12, 2009.
European Search Report for Application No. EP 07 71 0608.6 dated Mar. 19, 2010.
European Search Report for Application No. EP 07 71 9579 dated May 20, 2009.
European Search Report for Application No. EP 07 81 5784 dated Jul. 20, 2010 (2 pages).
European Search Report for Application No. EP 10 16 6143, dated Sep. 3, 2010 (2 pages).
European Search Report for Application No. EP 10 83 4294.0-1903, dated Apr. 8, 2013, (9 pages).
European Supplementary Search Report for Application No. EP 04 78 6662 dated Jan. 19, 2007 (2 pages).
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 11 73 9485.8 mailed Aug. 6, 2013(14 pages).
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP 09 73 3076.5, mailed Apr. 27, (13 pages).
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP 11 16 8677.0, mailed Nov. 29, 2012, (13 page).
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP 11 19 1641.7 mailed Jul. 11, 2012 (14 pages).
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP 10834297 mailed Oct. 27, 2014 (6 pages).
Fossum, Eric R.. “Active Pixel Sensors: Are CCD's Dinosaurs?” SPIE: Symposium on Electronic Imaging. Feb. 1, 1993 (13 pages).
Goh , “A New a-Si:H Thin-Film Transistor Pixel Circuit for Active-Matrix Organic Light-Emitting Diodes”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 24, No. 9, Sep. 2003, pp. 583-585.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/CA2005/001007 dated Oct. 16, 2006, 4 pages.
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/CA2004/001741 dated Feb. 21, 2005.
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/CA2004/001742, Canadian Patent Office, dated Feb. 21, 2005 (2 pages).
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/CA2005/001007 dated Oct. 18, 2005.
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/CA2005/001897, mailed Mar. 21, 2006 (2 pages).
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/CA2007/000652 dated Jul. 25, 2007.
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/CA2009/000501, mailed Jul. 30, 2009 (4 pages).
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/CA2009/001769, dated Apr. 8, 2010 (3 pages).
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/IB2010/055481, dated Apr. 7, 2011, 3 pages.
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/IB2010/055486, Dated Apr. 19, 2011, 5 pages.
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/IB2014/060959, Dated Aug. 28, 2014, 5 pages.
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/IB2010/055541 filed Dec. 1, 2010, dated May 26, 2011; 5 pages.
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/IB2011/050502, dated Jun. 27, 2011 (6 pages).
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/IB2011/051103, dated Jul. 8, 2011, 3 pages.
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/IB2011/055135, Canadian Patent Office, dated Apr. 16, 2012 (5 pages).
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/IB2012/052372, mailed Sep. 12, 2012 (3 pages).
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/IB2013/054251, Canadian Intellectual Property Office, dated Sep. 11, 2013; (4 pages).
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/JP02/09668, mailed Dec. 3, 2002, (4 pages).
International Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/CA2004/001742, Canadian Patent Office, dated Feb. 21, 2005 (5 pages).
International Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/CA2005/001897, mailed Mar. 21, 2006 (4 pages).
International Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/CA2009/000501 mailed Jul. 30, 2009 (6 pages).
International Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2010/055481, dated Apr. 7, 2011, 6 pages.
International Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2010/055486, Dated Apr. 19, 2011, 8 pages.
International Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2010/055541, dated May 26, 2011; 6 pages.
International Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2011/050502, dated Jun. 27, 2011 (7 pages).
International Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2011/051103, dated Jul. 8, 2011, 6 pages.
International Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2011/055135, Canadian Patent Office, dated Apr. 16, 2012 (5 pages).
International Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2012/052372, mailed Sep. 12, 2012 (6 pages).
International Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2013/054251, Canadian Intellectual Property Office, dated Sep. 11, 2013; (5 pages).
Jafarabadiashtiani : “A New Driving Method for a-Si AMOLED Displays Based on Voltage Feedback”; dated 2005 (4 pages).
Kanicki, J., “Amorphous Silicon Thin-Film Transistors Based Active-Matrix Organic Light-Emitting Displays.” Asia Display: International Display Workshops, Sep. 2001 (pp. 315-318).
Karim, K. S., “Amorphous Silicon Active Pixel Sensor Readout Circuit for Digital Imaging.” IEEE: Transactions on Electron Devices. vol. 50, No. 1, Jan. 2003 (pp. 200-208).
Lee : “Ambipolar Thin-Film Transistors Fabricated by PECVD Nanocrystalline Silicon”; dated 2006.
Lee, Wonbok: “Thermal Management in Microprocessor Chips and Dynamic Backlight Control in Liquid Crystal Displays”, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Southern California (124 pages).
Liu, P. et al , Innovative Voltage Driving Pixel Circuit Using Organic Thin-Film Transistor for AMOLEDs, Journal of Display Technology, vol. 5, Issue 6, Jun. 2009 (pp. 224-227).
Ma E Y: “organic light emitting diode/thin film transistor integration for foldable displays” dated Sep. 15, 1997(4 pages).
Matsueda y : “35.1: 2.5-in. AMOLED with Integrated 6-bit Gamma Compensated Digital Data Driver”; dated May 2004.
Mendes E., “A High Resolution Switch-Current Memory Base Cell.” IEEE: Circuits and Systems. vol. 2, Aug. 1999 (pp. 718-721).
Nathan A. , “Thin Film imaging technology on glass and plastic” ICM 2000, proceedings of the 12 international conference on microelectronics, dated Oct. 31, 2001 (4 pages).
Nathan , “Amorphous Silicon Thin Film Transistor Circuit Integration for Organic LED Displays on Glass and Plastic”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 39, No. 9, Sep. 2004, pp. 1477-1486.
Nathan : “Backplane Requirements for active Matrix Organic Light Emitting Diode Displays,”; dated 2006 (16 pages).
Nathan : “Call for papers second international workshop on compact thin-film transistor (TFT) modeling for circuit simulation”; dated Sep. 2009 (1 page).
Nathan : “Driving schemes for a-Si and LTPS AMOLED displays”; dated Dec. 2005 (11 pages).
Nathan : “Invited Paper: a-Si for AMOLED—Meeting the Performance and Cost Demands of Display Applications (Cell Phone to HDTV)”, dated 2006 (4 pages).
Office Action in Japanese patent application No. JP2012-541612 dated Jul. 15, 2014. (3 pages).
Partial European Search Report for Application No. EP 11 168 677.0, mailed Sep. 22, 2011 (5 pages).
Partial European Search Report for Application No. EP 11 19 1641.7, mailed Mar. 20, 2012 (8 pages).
Philipp: “Charge transfer sensing” Sensor Review, vol. 19, No. 2, Dec. 31, 1999, 10 pages.
Rafati : “Comparison of a 17 b multiplier in Dual-rail domino and in Dual-rail D L (D L) logic styles”; dated 2002 (4 pages).
Safavian : “3-TFT active pixel sensor with correlated double sampling readout circuit for real-time medical x-ray imaging”; dated Jun. 2006 (4 pages).
Safavian : “A novel current scaling active pixel sensor with correlated double sampling readout circuit for real time medical x-ray imaging”; dated May 2007 (7 pages).
Safavian : “A novel hybrid active-passive pixel with correlated double sampling CMOS readout circuit for medical x-ray imaging”; dated May 2008 (4 pages).
Safavian : “Self-compensated a-Si:H detector with current-mode readout circuit for digital X-ray fluoroscopy”; dated Aug. 2005 (4 pages).
Safavian : “TFT active image sensor with current-mode readout circuit for digital x-ray fluoroscopy [5969D-82]”; dated Sep. 2005 (9 pages).
Safavian : “Three-TFT image sensor for real-time digital X-ray imaging”; dated Feb. 2, 2006 (2 pages).
Singh, “Current Conveyor: Novel Universal Active Block”, Samriddhi, S-JPSET vol. I, Issue 1, 2010, pp. 41-48 (12EPPT).
Smith, Lindsay I., “A tutorial on Principal Components Analysis,” dated Feb. 26, 2001 (27 pages).
Spindler , System Considerations for RGBW OLED Displays, Journal of the SID 14/1, 2006, pp. 37-48.
Stewart M. , “polysilicon TFT technology for active matrix oled displays” IEEE transactions on electron devices, vol. 48, No. 5, dated May 2001 (7 pages).
Vygranenko : “Stability of indium-oxide thin-film transistors by reactive ion beam assisted deposition”; dated 2009.
Wang : “Indium oxides by reactive ion beam assisted evaporation: From material study to device application”; dated Mar. 2009 (6 pages).
Yi He , “Current-Source a-Si:H Thin Film Transistor Circuit for Active-Matrix Organic Light-Emitting Displays”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 21, No. 12, Dec. 2000, pp. 590-592.
Yu, Jennifer: “Improve OLED Technology for Display”, Ph.D. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sep. 2008 (151 pages).
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/IB2014/058244, Canadian Intellectual Property Office, dated Apr. 11, 2014; (6 pages).
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/IB2014/059753, Canadian Intellectual Property Office, dated Jun. 23, 2014; (6 pages).
Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2014/059753, Canadian Intellectual Property Office, dated Jun. 12, 2014 (6 pages).
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/IB2014/060879, Canadian Intellectual Property Office, dated Jul. 17, 2014 (3 pages).
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP 14158051.4, mailed Jul. 29, 2014, (4 pages).
Office Action in Chinese Patent Invention No. 201180008188.9, dated Jun. 4, 2014 (17 pages)(w/English translation).
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/IB/2014/066932 dated Mar. 24, 2015.
Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB/2014/066932 dated Mar. 24, 2015.
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP 11866291.5, mailed Mar. 9, 2015, (9 pages).
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP 14181848.4, mailed Mar. 5, 2015, (8 pages).
Office Action in Chinese Patent Invention No. 201280022957.5, dated Jun. 26, 2015 (7 pages).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20160005350 A1 Jan 2016 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 13844856 Mar 2013 US
Child 14797278 US
Parent 12816856 Jun 2010 US
Child 13844856 US