The invention relates to near-wall cooling channels for gas turbine components such as blades, vanes, and shroud elements.
Components in the hot gas flow path of gas turbines often have internal cooling channels. Cooling effectiveness is important in order to minimize thermal stress on these components. Cooling efficiency is important in order to minimize the volume of air diverted from the compressor for cooling. Film cooling provides a film of cooling air on outer surfaces of a component via holes from internal cooling channels. Film cooling can be inefficient, because so many holes are needed that a high volume of cooling air is required. Thus, film cooling has been used selectively in combination with other techniques. Impingement cooling is a technique in which perforated baffles are spaced from a back surface of a component opposite a heated surface to create impingement jets of cooling air against the back surface. It is also known to provide serpentine cooling channels in a component.
The trailing edge portion of a gas turbine airfoil may include up to about ⅓ of the total airfoil external surface area. A trailing edge is thin for aerodynamic efficiency, so it receives heat input on its two opposed exterior surfaces that are relatively close to each other, and thus a relatively high coolant flow rate is required to maintain mechanical integrity. Trailing edge cooling channels have been configured in various ways to increase efficiency. For example U.S. Pat. No. 5,370,499 discloses a mesh of coolant exit channels in the trailing edge. Trailing edge exit channels commonly have a transverse sectional profile that is rectangular, circular, or oval.
The present invention increases heat transfer efficiency and uniformity in cooling channels such as those in the trailing edge of turbine airfoils, thus reducing the coolant flow volume needed.
The invention is explained in the following description in view of the drawings that show:
The fins 44 may have heights that follow a convex profile such as 56A or 56B, providing a maximum fin height H at mid-width of the near-wall inner surface 48. These fins 44 increase the surface area of the near-wall surfaces 48, 50, and also increase the flow in the corners C. The taller middle fins slow the flow 22 centrally, while the shorter distal fins allow faster flow in the corners C. The combination of convex sides 52, 54 and convex fin height profile 56A, 56B has a synergy that focuses cooling toward the channel corners C.
Dimensions of the channel profile 46 may be selected using known engineering methods. The following proportions are provided as an example only. These length units are dimensionless and may be sized proportionately in any unit of measurement or scale, since proportion is the relevant aspect exemplified in this drawing. In one embodiment, angle A=60°, and the relative dimensions are B=1.00, D=0.05, H=0.20, W1=1.00, W2=0.60. Here, the minimum channel width W2 is 60% of the near-wall width W1. In general, the minimum channel width W2 may be 80% or less of the near wall width W1, or 65% or less in certain embodiments. One or more proportions and/or dimensions may vary along the length of the cooling channel. For example, dimension B may vary somewhat with the thickness of the trailing edge without varying dimension H in one embodiment.
The present channels 36, 36B are useful in any near-wall cooling application, such as in vanes, blades, shrouds, and possibly in combustors and transition ducts of gas turbines. They are ideal for a parallel series of small, near-wall channels, such as trailing edge coolant exit channels of airfoils, because they increase the uniformity of cooling of a parallel series of channels. The present channels may be formed by any known fabrication technique—for example by casting an airfoil over a positive ceramic core that is chemically removed after casting.
A benefit of the invention is that the near-wall distal corners C of the channels remove more heat than in prior cooling channels for a given coolant flow volume. This improves efficiency, effectiveness, and uniformity of cooling by overcoming the tendency of coolant to flow slower in the corners. Increasing the corner cooling helps compensate for the cooling reduction in the gaps G between channels. The invention also provides increased heat transfer area along the primary surface to be cooled through the use of the fins 44 which are not used along other surfaces of the cooling channel.
While various embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described herein, it will be obvious that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes and substitutions may be made without departing from the invention herein. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention be limited only by the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5063662 | Porter | Nov 1991 | A |
5215431 | Derrien | Jun 1993 | A |
5269058 | Wiggs | Dec 1993 | A |
5370499 | Lee | Dec 1994 | A |
5496151 | Coudray | Mar 1996 | A |
5498133 | Lee | Mar 1996 | A |
5503529 | Anselmi | Apr 1996 | A |
5511946 | Lee | Apr 1996 | A |
5586866 | Wettstein | Dec 1996 | A |
5629834 | Kodama | May 1997 | A |
5690473 | Kercher | Nov 1997 | A |
5695320 | Kercher | Dec 1997 | A |
5695321 | Kercher | Dec 1997 | A |
5700132 | Lampes | Dec 1997 | A |
5752801 | Kennedy | May 1998 | A |
5813836 | Starkweather | Sep 1998 | A |
6086328 | Lee | Jul 2000 | A |
6190129 | Mayer | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6254334 | LaFleur | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273682 | Lee | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289981 | Tokizaki | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6379118 | Lutum | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6514042 | Kvasnak | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6837683 | Dailey | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6874987 | Slinger | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6932570 | Heyward | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6969237 | Hudson | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6981840 | Lee | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6984102 | Bunker | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7011502 | Lee | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7044210 | Usui | May 2006 | B2 |
7080972 | Rawlinson | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7114923 | Liang | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7131818 | Cunha | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7182576 | Bunker | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7186084 | Bunker | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7273351 | Kopmels | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7296973 | Lee | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7328580 | Lee | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7414839 | Yu | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7544044 | Liang | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7563072 | Liang | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7665956 | Mitchell | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7694522 | Nakae | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7866950 | Wilson, Jr. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
8057183 | Liang | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8066483 | Liang | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8092175 | Beeck | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8092177 | Liang | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8096766 | Downs | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8151617 | Feng | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8162609 | Liang | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8167537 | Plank | May 2012 | B1 |
8257809 | Morrison | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8317475 | Downs | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8322988 | Downs | Dec 2012 | B1 |
20050274506 | Bhatti | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20070258814 | Metrisin | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20110132563 | Merrill | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110132564 | Merrill | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120034077 | Jairazbhoy | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120207614 | Lee | Aug 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10248548 | Oct 2002 | DE |
1630653 | Mar 2006 | EP |
2258925 | Dec 2010 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140286791 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12985553 | Jan 2011 | US |
Child | 14299066 | US |