Many invasive medical procedures require the use of radiation to visualize and track the location of an inserted device. For example, procedures involving catheter insertion, such as invasive electrophysiology procedures, rely on fluoroscopy or other radioactive imaging techniques to help navigate and position the catheter within a patient's body at a particular site, such as in the heart or inside a blood vessel in the circulatory system.
High dosages of radiation may have long term adverse health effects. A patient may be directly exposed only once or twice to radiation during such procedures and avoid such adverse effects. However, physicians, medical technicians and staff can experience a large cumulative radiation dosage over time, both directly and indirectly, from conducting many procedures.
To protect the operator and staff from this radiation, shielding such as lead aprons, gowns, glasses, skirts, etc., is worn. Such lead clothing, especially a lead apron, is quite heavy and uncomfortable, and its use has been associated with cervical and lumbar spine injury or degradation.
The various embodiments include a catheter positioning system having a sled member configured to accept a handle of a catheter and a sled base configured to move the sled member along a length of the sled base in order to position the catheter within a patient, that also features a counterweight moveably coupled to the sled base by a drive mechanism that is configured to move the counterweight in order to reduce shifting of the center of mass of the sled member, sled base and counterweight as the sled member is moved along the sled base. In an embodiment, the counterweight is moveably coupled to the sled base and the drive mechanism is configured so that the counterweight moves along the length of the sled base. In an embodiment, the drive mechanism includes a cable coupled between the counterweight and the sled member and passing around at least one pulley that is configured so that the counterweight moves in a direction opposite to that of the sled member. In an embodiment in which the counterweight has a weight substantially similar to that of the sled member the drive mechanism may be configured so that the counterweight moves the same distance as the sled member, though in the opposite direction. If the counterweight has a weight substantially different from that of the sled member, the drive mechanism may be configured so that the counterweight moves a distance that is approximately equal to the distance moved by the sled member times the ratio of the weight of the sled member divided by the weight of the counterweight. In an embodiment, the drive mechanism may include a drive motor and at least one gear coupled to the drive motor.
In a further embodiment, the catheter positioning system may include a sensor coupled to the catheter positioning system, and a control system coupled to the sensor that is configured to control the drive mechanism to move the counterweight based on data from the sensor. In this embodiment, the sensor may be any one or more of a tilt sensor, a pressure sensor, a stress sensor, and a strain sensor. Overall, the counterweight may be configured on the catheter positioning system to move in response to movements of the sled member so that a bending moment applied to a support structure supporting the sled base remains approximately constant.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated herein and constitute part of this specification, illustrate exemplary embodiments of the invention, and together with the general description given above and the detailed description given below, serve to explain the features of the invention.
Various embodiments will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts. References made to particular examples and implementations are for illustrative purposes and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention or the claims.
Various embodiments provide systems and methods for reducing bending moments in a catheter positioning system during catheterization procedures. The embodiment systems allow a physician to remotely control a catheter position within a patient while being positioned away from sources of radiation used for imaging, thereby avoiding harm associated with repeated exposure to radiation or caused by heavy protective gear. A catheter positioning device provides a telerobotic capability to advance and rotate an attached catheter within a patient's body. The catheter positioning device may also be used to actuate the catheter, such as by controlling an actuator on a catheter's handle to deflect a tip to help in navigation. An example of a catheter positioning device is disclosed in PCT Application PCT/US2009/0311357, which published as WO 1009/092059 and is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for details of the catheter positioning device.
A catheter positioning system such as disclosed in WO 1009/092059 functions to advance or withdraw the catheter longitudinally in order to advance or withdraw the catheter within the patient's body. Since the catheter enters the patient's body at a single point, the catheter positioning system may include a rail or sled base along which a sled member holding the catheter handle advances, and a support structure that holds the rail or sled base in a fixed orientation with respect to the patient. For example, the support structure may be a bridge or arm that extends over a table to hold the catheter positioning system rail or sled base at a fixed elevation an angle with respect to the patient.
The sled member may itself include drive motors for rotating the catheter handle, and thus may be heavy. As the sled member advances along the rail or sled base, the distance between the sled member and the support structure holding the rail or sled base will change. As a result, a bending moment applied to the support structure will change as the moment arm (i.e., the distance between the sled member and the support structure) changes. For example, when the catheter is fully withdrawn from the patient and the sled member near a distal end of the rail or sled base, the bending moment applied to the support structure may be significantly greater than when the catheter is partially inserted such that the sled member is positioned near the support structure. Patient safety requires that the angle of insertion of the catheter remain as steady as possible, so the support structure must be sufficiently rigid as to accommodate this change in bending moment without deflecting during a procedure. However, this requirement may add substantial mass and cost to the support structure, and limit the types of support structures that may be implemented.
In various embodiments the catheter positioning device address the problem of changes in the bending moment applied to a support structure by including a counterweight system configured to maintain a consistent center of mass of the system as a catheter is positioned. In overview, the counterweight may be of sufficient mass and coupled to a drive mechanism that moves the mass in conjunction with movement of the sled member so as to at least partially overcome changes in the bending moment applied to a support structure. By functioning to maintain an approximately consistent center of mass system, embodiment counterweight systems may help to keep the catheter positioning device stable during catheterization procedures, while reducing the strength and weight of the device support structures.
In an embodiment, the counterweight may be moved by various mechanical mechanisms, such as a pulley system or gear drive, in response to the motion of the sled member of the catheter positioning system. In further embodiments, a control system may control movement of the counterweight based on one or more sensors for detecting the position of the sled member along the rail or sled base, bending stress applied to the support structure, and/or strain in various parts of the catheter positioning device or support structure.
The sled base may be held in position above a patient or operating table 120 by a bridge (not shown) or support arm 112 that includes a sled base support structure 114 that holds the sled base 102 in a fixed position and orientation. The arm 112 may be extended or rotated to position the sled base 102 relative to a patient on the operating table 120. The sled base may also include a nose cone 116 that supports insertion of the catheter into a patient. A catheter may be advanced along the sled base 102 by the sled member 104 so that it passes through the nose cone 116 and into the patient.
The sled base 102 may include a sterile barrier configured to support and protect the catheter. The sterile barrier may include a resealable delivery channel configured to receive and guide the catheter along the sled base as it is advanced by the sled member 104. For example, the catheter may be inserted into the delivery channel and then the catheter handle 118 may be connected to the sled member 104 (such as by using the modular plate 106 discussed below) such that the catheter is driven forward by translation of the sled member 104 along the resealable delivery channel in the sled base 102 and through the nose cone 116 into the patient.
The sled member 104 may be coupled to a modular plate 106 to which a catheter handle 118 may be attached. Many alternate modular plates 106 that may be swapped out so that the catheter positioning system may be used with many different types of catheters. Depending on the kind of catheter that is desired for a procedure, an appropriate modular plate 106 may be attached to the sled member 104 and the catheter may be attached to the module plate 106. The modular plate 106 may also integrate with any actuators on the catheter handle 118 thereby allowing an operator to control the actuators via the remote controller 124.
The sled member 104 may be rotated by a drive mechanism in order to rotate a catheter connected to the modular plate 106. This rotation may be controlled remotely via the remote controller 124. By controlling translation along the sled base 102, rotation of the sled member 104, and actuation of the catheter's handle via the modular plate 106, an operator may position or use the catheter in any way necessary for a desired operation. Further, an operator may control each of these degrees of freedom (i.e., translation, rotation, and actuation) remotely with the remote controller 124.
A remote controller 124 may be connected to a programmable control system 132 by a wired connector 136 or a wireless data link (not shown). The programmable control system 132 may also be connected to the catheter positioning device 100 by a wired connector 134 or a wireless data link (not shown). The programmable control system 132 may output command signals to the positioning device 100 based on training or programming, such as programmed movements for automatic positioning of the catheter.
The counterweight 202 creates a bending moment M2, which may be applied as a torque about the support structure 114 that is approximately equal to the bending moment M1. Because the bending moment M2 is applied on the opposite side of the support structure 114, the bending moment M2 applies a force in the opposite direction of the bending moment M1 applied by sled member 104 (e.g., due to the support structure 114 acting as a fulcrum). The moment arm 210 of the counterweight 202 extends from the center of mass of the counterweight 202 to the center of the support structure 114. The moment arm 208 of the sled member 104 extends from the center of mass of the sled member 104 to the center of the support structure 114. Thus, the support structure 114 may translate downward forces applied from the counterweight 202 side of the sled base 102 to an upward force on the sled member 104 side of the sled base 102.
As the sled member 104 advances on the sled base 102 to position the catheter, its moment arm 208 changes. For example, the moment arm 208 may decrease as it approaches a mid-point of the support structure 114. The moment arm 208 may increase as it approaches full travel in a direction away from the support structure 114. Thus, because the force of the sled member 104 (e.g., mass or weight) remains constant, the bending moment M1 applied to the support structure 114 from the sled member 104 changes in direct proportion to the length of the moment arm 208, such as r1.
To counter this change in the bending moment M1 applied due to the sled member 104 and to help prevent deflection and tilting of the sled base 102, a bending moment M2 may be exerted by the counterweight 202 that counters the bending moment M1. As the position of the sled base 102 changes, the position of the counterweight 202 may be changed in the opposite direction by moving the counterweight 202 towards or away from the support structure 114 to increase or decrease its moment arm 210. If the counterweight 202 and sled member 104 are on opposite sides of the support structure 114, the moments may act about the same axis (i.e., the support structure 114) but in opposite directions with the support structure 114 acting as a fulcrum (e.g., similar to children balancing on a seesaw).
In embodiments in which the sled member 104 and counterweight 202 weigh the same, then the counterweight 202 may be moved a distance equal to the distance of travel of the sled member 104 (though in an opposite direction). In other embodiments, the mass of the counterweight 202 may be different from that of the sled member 104. In such embodiments, the amount of travel of the counterweight 202 may be equal to the distance of travel of the sled member times the ratio of the masses of the sled member to the counterweight. Again, this is because bending moment is equal to the weight times the moment arm. In examples, such as when the support structure is located toward one end of the sled base 102, an insufficient amount of distance on the counterweight 202 side of the sled base 102 may exist between the end of the sled base 102 and the support structure 114. Limiting the range of movement of the counterweight 202. Thus, the limited range of movement of the counterweight 202 may be compensated for by increasing its mass compared to the sled member 104. Thus, a relatively shorter moment arm 210 may nevertheless produce a sufficient bending moment M2 to compensate for the bending moment M2 when the mass of the counterweight 202 is increased.
In the various embodiments, any of a number of drive mechanisms may be used to move the counterweight 202 in response to movements of the sled member 104
In further embodiments, as illustrated in
In a further embodiment illustrated in
In another embodiment illustrated in
In a further embodiment, a cable linkage between the sled member 104 and counterweight 202 may include a block and tackle arrangement to enable use of a counterweight that is different from the weight of the sled member. For example, instead of a direct linkage, the counterweight 202 may be coupled to a pulley and the cable fixed to the sled base after passing through the pulley. In this configuration the counterweight will move half as far as the sled member 104 in either direction, so the counterweight may weigh twice as much as the sled member 104.
In further embodiments, the counterweight may be coupled with a retrieval mechanism configured to move the counterweight in the opposite direction. For example, as the sled member 104 moves backwards, a retrieval mechanism may move the counterweight 202 in the opposite direction and draw up any slack in the cable 304. Various retrieval mechanisms may be used, such as a second cable and pulley connected to a motor or the front of the sled member.
In a further embodiment, the counterweight 202b and sled member 104 may have different weights, as illustrated in
In a further embodiment, a counterweight may be moved by a drive system (e.g., an electric motor) controlled by a control system in response to sensors that detect a need for balancing. For example, one or more sensors may detect weight, pressure, bending stress, strain, deflection of the sled base or other parameters of one or more components of the catheter positioning system. Based on data from of the sensors, the control system may reposition the counterweight accordingly to adjust the magnitude of force applied to the system by the counterweight. The control system may continue making adjustments based on feedback from the sensors until the desired state (e.g., a balanced total moment, zero total moment, a desired steady state response, etc.) is achieved.
Such an embodiment is illustrated in
In various embodiments, one or more damping systems may be used to stabilize the catheter positioning system. The damping systems may resist motion of the catheter positioning system, thereby preventing any sudden or jerky movements of the sled base, nose cone, or introducer that may cause deflections and interfere with catheter positioning procedures. Damping systems may help counter movement even when the sled member and counterweight are stationary, such as by resisting unintentional movement from bumps or snags.
In various embodiments a passive damping system may include one or more shock absorbers or dashpots. For example,
Alternate embodiments include active damping systems featuring motion compensating mechanisms coupled to a control system with sensors.
While various embodiments, including preferred embodiments, have been described, the invention is only limited by the scope of the claims. Those skilled in the art will recognize that the methods and systems of the present invention have many applications, may be implemented in many manners and, as such, is not to be limited by the preceding exemplary embodiments and examples. Additionally, the functionality of the components of the preceding embodiments may be implemented in different manners. Further, it is to be understood that the steps in the embodiments may be performed in any suitable order, combined into fewer steps or divided into more steps. Thus, the scope of the present invention covers conventionally known and future developed variations and modifications to the system components described herein, as would be understood by those skilled in the art.
The present invention claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/870,311, entitled “COMPONENTS AND METHODS FOR BALANCING A CATHETER CONTROLLER SYSTEM WITH A COUNTERWEIGHT,” filed Aug. 27, 2013, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4549538 | Schadrack, III et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4721123 | Cosentino et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
5226892 | Boswell | Jul 1993 | A |
5644551 | Carmichael et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5649956 | Jensen et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5682890 | Kormos et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5810880 | Jensen et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814038 | Jensen et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5827313 | Ream | Oct 1998 | A |
5855583 | Wang et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6007550 | Wang et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6063095 | Wang et al. | May 2000 | A |
6080181 | Jensen et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6096004 | Meglan et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6132368 | Cooper | Oct 2000 | A |
6171234 | White et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6171277 | Ponzi | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6200315 | Gaiser et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6346072 | Cooper | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6396232 | Haanpaa et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6398755 | Belef et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6413264 | Jensen et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6445984 | Kellogg | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6461372 | Jensen et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6527782 | Hogg et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6620174 | Jensen et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6726675 | Beyar | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6788999 | Green | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6850817 | Green | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6963792 | Green | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6974465 | Belef et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6999852 | Green | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7006895 | Green | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7090683 | Brock et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7118582 | Wang et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7169141 | Brock et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7204844 | Jensen et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7214230 | Brock et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7276044 | Ferry et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7314230 | Kumagai et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7331967 | Lee et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7357774 | Cooper | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7371210 | Brock et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7377906 | Selkee | May 2008 | B2 |
7537570 | Kastelein | May 2009 | B2 |
7630752 | Viswanathan | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7648513 | Green et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7758564 | Long | Jul 2010 | B2 |
8046049 | Govari et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8480618 | Wenderow | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8672880 | Cohen et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
20010053879 | Mills et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020042620 | Julian et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020072704 | Mansouri-Ruiz | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020120254 | Julian et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020177789 | Ferry et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183723 | Belef et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040077942 | Hall et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040254566 | Plicchi | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050038412 | Rabiner et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050065435 | Rauch et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050113719 | Saadat | May 2005 | A1 |
20050203382 | Govari et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209614 | Fenter | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050222554 | Wallace et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050228440 | Brock | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050277874 | Selkee | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283140 | Jensen et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060009735 | Viswanathan et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060041181 | Viswanathan et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060084911 | Belef et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060084945 | Moll et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095022 | Moll et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060161136 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161137 | Orban et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161138 | Orban et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167441 | Wang et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060178559 | Kumar et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060229587 | Beyar | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235436 | Anderson et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060270915 | Ritter et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060293643 | Wallace et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070012135 | Tierney et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016174 | Millman et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070019330 | Wolfersberger | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070021776 | Jensen et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070043338 | Moll et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043455 | Viswanathan et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070149946 | Viswanathan et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070233044 | Wallace et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239172 | Lee et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250073 | Brock et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250074 | Brock et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070260115 | Brock et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276423 | Green | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070283263 | Zawde et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070299479 | Saksena | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080009791 | Cohen et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080039869 | Mills et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080045892 | Ferry et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080059598 | Garibaldi et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080119824 | Weitzner et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080119872 | Brock et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080125793 | Brock et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080125794 | Brock et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080140087 | Barbagli | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147091 | Cooper | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080183136 | Lenker et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080215065 | Wang et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080245946 | Yu | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080249536 | Stahler et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080300592 | Weitzner et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090012533 | Barbagli et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090082722 | Munger et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090105639 | Weitzner et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105645 | Kidd et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090248043 | Tierney et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100010475 | Teirstein et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100256558 | Olson et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110077590 | Plicchi et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20120182134 | Doyle | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120184955 | Pivotto et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120197182 | Millman et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120220931 | Cohen | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130138118 | Doyle | May 2013 | A1 |
20130317519 | Romo | Nov 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2007527296 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2005087128 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2007008967 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2009092059 | Jul 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
WIPO, International Preliminary Report on Patentability; PCT/US2006/027024; Jan. 16, 2008; 8pgs. |
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, First Office Action, Oct. 30, 2009, Chinese Patent Application 200680025512.7, “Remotely Controlled Catheter Insertion System,” with English translation, (24 pgs. total). |
Chinese Application 200680025512.7, State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, Office Action dated Feb. 13, 2012. |
Chinese Application 200980102420.8, State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, Office Action dated Feb. 16, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Intl Application PCT/US2009/031357. International Bureau of WIPO, Jul. 29, 2010. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, Intl Application PCT/US2009/031357. International Search Authority, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (ISA/US), Mar. 19, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/051,736, Final Office Action dated Nov. 5, 2012. |
Hein et al., “Robot Supported Insertion of Catheters for Hyperthermia and Branch Therapy,” Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 1998, pp. 660-663. |
Macoviak, “Catheter System for Surgical Access and Circulatory Support of the Heart,” USPTO, Official Gazette, vol. 1278, Jan. 6, 2004. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/051,736, Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 17, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,397, Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 19, 2012. |
Canadian Application 2,646,846, Office Action dated Sep. 19, 2012. |
Extended European Search Report of Apr. 17, 2013; European Application No. 09702983.9. |
Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-543298; Office Action of Mar. 19, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/461,463, Final Office Action dated Jun. 27, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/461,463, Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 31, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/515,005, Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 11. 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/078,663, Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150066052 A1 | Mar 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61870311 | Aug 2013 | US |