This application claims benefit of EP Patent App. Ser. No. 14305938.4 filed Jun. 18, 2014, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The statements in this section merely provide background information related to the present disclosure and may not constitute prior art.
The present disclosure broadly relates to systems and methods for cementing subterranean wells and maintaining zonal isolation therein.
Good bonding between set cement and casing and between set cement and the formation is essential for effective zonal isolation. Poor bonding limits production and reduces the effectiveness of stimulation treatments. Communication between zones can be caused by inadequate mud removal, poor cement/formation bonding, expansion and contraction of the casing resulting from internal pressure variations or thermal stresses, and cement contamination by drilling or formation fluids. Under such circumstances a small gap or microannulus may form at the cement/casing or the cement/formation interface or both.
Cement systems that expand slightly after setting may provide a means for sealing microannuli and improving primary cementing results. The improved bonding may be the result of mechanical resistance or tightening of the cement against the pipe and formation.
Portland cement manufacturers generally limit the amount of certain alkaline impurities to avoid expansion of the set cement, a condition called “unsoundness.” In an unrestrained environment such as a road or building, expansion of the set cement can result in cracking and failure. In a wellbore environment, however, the cement is restrained by the casing and, when competent, the formation. Consequently, once the cement has expanded to eliminate void spaces, further expansion reduces internal porosity. Generally, expanding cements should be more flexible than the formation; otherwise, the cement may not expand toward the casing, risking the formation of a microannulus.
The presence or absence of cement in the annulus between casing and the formation (or between two casing strings) may be detected by acoustic logging. Among the tools currently available, sonic or ultrasonic imagers are commonly used. However, when a gas-filled microannulus exists, these tools are unable to detect the presence of cement behind. A common practice is to run logs while applying pressure inside the casing, thus causing the casing to expand and contact the cement sheath.
The present disclosure reveals methods for pre-stressing the cement sheath, thereby allowing the cement to maintain an acoustic coupling with the casing despite pressure and temperature variations, mechanical perturbations arising from well intervention operations and deposits of drilling fluid or spacer left on the casing surface.
In an aspect, embodiments relate to methods for cementing a subterranean well having a borehole. A cement slurry is prepared that comprises water, an inorganic cement and an expanding agent. The slurry is then placed in an annular region between a tubular body and a borehole wall, or between two tubular bodies. The slurry is allowed to harden and form a set cement. After setting, the expanding agent is allowed to react and cause the set cement to be in a state of compression within the annular region.
In a further aspect, embodiments relate to methods for maintaining zonal isolation in a wellbore. A cement slurry is prepared that comprises water, an inorganic cement and an expanding agent. The slurry is then placed in an annular region between a tubular body and a borehole wall, or between two tubular bodies. The slurry is allowed to harden and form a set cement. The dimensions of the tubular body are allowed to fluctuate in response to a temperature change, a pressure change, or a mechanical disturbance resulting from a well intervention or a combination thereof. The expanding agent is then allowed to react and cause the set cement to be in a state of compression within the annular region.
In yet a further aspect, embodiments relate to methods for determining the presence of cement behind a tubular body in a subterranean well. A cement slurry is prepared that comprises water, an inorganic cement and an expanding agent. The slurry is then placed in an annular region between a tubular body and a borehole wall, or between two tubular bodies. The slurry is allowed to harden and form a set cement. After setting, the expanding agent is allowed to react and cause the set cement to be in a state of compression within the annular region. An acoustic logging tool is then introduced into the tubular body. The tool measures the acoustic impedance, an amplitude, an attenuation or a bond index or a combination thereof, the measurements taken azimuthally, longitudinally or both along the tubular body.
The present disclosure will be described in terms of treatment of vertical wells, but is equally applicable to wells of any orientation. The disclosure will be described for hydrocarbon-production wells, but it is to be understood that the disclosed methods can be used for wells for the production of other fluids, such as water or carbon dioxide, or, for example, for injection or storage wells. It should also be understood that throughout this specification, when a concentration or amount range is described as being useful, or suitable, or the like, it is intended that any and every concentration or amount within the range, including the end points, is to be considered as having been stated. Furthermore, each numerical value should be read once as modified by the term “about” (unless already expressly so modified) and then read again as not to be so modified unless otherwise stated in context. For example, “a range of from 1 to 10” is to be read as indicating each and every possible number along the continuum between about 1 and about 10. In other words, when a certain range is expressed, even if only a few specific data points are explicitly identified or referred to within the range, or even when no data points are referred to within the range, it is to be understood that the Applicants appreciate and understand that any and all data points within the range are to be considered to have been specified, and that the Applicants have possession of the entire range and all points within the range.
In this disclosure, the tubular body may be any string of tubulars that may be run into the wellbore and at least partially cemented in place. Examples include casing, liner, solid expandable tubular, production tubing and drill pipe.
In an aspect, embodiments relate to methods for cementing a subterranean well having a borehole. A cement slurry is prepared that comprises water, an inorganic cement and an expanding agent. The slurry is then placed in an annular region between a tubular body and a borehole wall, or between two tubular bodies. The slurry is allowed to harden and form a set cement. After setting, the expanding agent is allowed to react and cause the set cement to be in a state of compression within the annular region.
The method may further comprise allowing the dimensions of the tubular body to fluctuate in response to a temperature change, a pressure change, or a mechanical disturbance resulting from a well intervention or a combination thereof. The method may also further comprise allowing the set cement to expand and maintain the state of compression after the dimensional fluctuation of the tubular body.
In a further aspect, embodiments relate to methods for maintaining zonal isolation in a wellbore. A cement slurry is prepared that comprises water, an inorganic cement and an expanding agent. The slurry is then placed in an annular region between a tubular body and a borehole wall, or between two tubular bodies. The slurry is allowed to harden and form a set cement. The dimensions of the tubular body are allowed to fluctuate in response to a temperature change, a pressure change, or a mechanical disturbance resulting from a well intervention or a combination thereof. The expanding agent is then allowed to react and cause the set cement to be in a state of compression within the annular region.
In yet a further aspect, embodiments relate to methods for determining the presence of cement behind a tubular body in a subterranean well. A cement slurry is prepared that comprises water, an inorganic cement and an expanding agent. The slurry is then placed in an annular region between a tubular body and a borehole wall, or between two tubular bodies. The slurry is allowed to harden and form a set cement. After setting, the expanding agent is allowed to react and cause the set cement to be in a state of compression within the annular region. An acoustic logging tool is then introduced into the tubular body. The tool measures the acoustic impedance, an amplitude, an attenuation or a bond index or a combination thereof, the measurements taken azimuthally, longitudinally or both along the tubular body.
For all aspects, the viscosity of the cement slurry during placement may be lower than 1000 cP at a shear rate of 100 s−1. The inorganic cement may comprise portland cement, calcium aluminate cement, fly ash, blast furnace slag, lime/silica blends, zeolites, magnesium oxychloride, geopolymers or chemically bonded phosphate ceramics or combinations thereof.
For all aspects, the expanding agent may comprise calcium oxide, magnesium oxide or calcium sulfate hemihydrate or combinations thereof. The expanding agent may be present at a concentration between 5% and 25% by weight of cement.
For all aspects, the cement expansion may be delayed. The expanding agent may be encapsulated or held as an internal phase of an emulsion.
For all aspects the cement slurry may further comprise silica, diatomaceous earth, gilsonite, hematite, ilmenite, manganese tetraoxide, barite, glass or ceramic microspheres or combinations thereof.
The following examples are provided to more fully illustrate the disclosure. These examples are not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure in any way.
All of the experiments presented here were performed with Class G oilwell cement. For the confined expansion measurements described in Example 1, the expanding agent was hard-burned magnesium oxide (MgO). The MgO was present at concentrations of 5%, 14%, and 25% by weight of cement (BWOC). The 5% concentration is at the upper end of what is typically used in the field. Slurries were prepared at a water-to-solids ratio of 0.41, and mixed by hand or with a low-speed paddle mixer. No other additives were used. For confined expansion testing, approximately 50 g of slurry was used. The expansion tests were conducted at 85° C. and ambient pressure.
For the logging experiments described in Example 2, Class G cement was used, and the expanding agent was a mixture of hard-burned CaO and hard-burned MgO. The CaO/MgO weight ratio was 1.43. CaO and MgO hydrate in similar ways to generate expansion, but CaO tends to be much more reactive at a given temperature than MgO. These experiments were conducted with a neat cement slurry or one with 12% BWOC of expanding agent. In both cases the water-to-solids ratio was 0.41. Small amounts of dispersant, anti-settling agent, and antifoaming agent were also added to generate a stable slurry. Mixing was performed in a Waring high-speed blender with a capacity of 4 L. Because the logging test requires about 7 L of slurry, two batches were prepared for each test and combined.
To measure the effects of expanding agents under confined conditions, a temperature-controlled confinement cell was designed and built (
The steel cylinder is screwed inside a heating/insulator chamber 103 where a glycol bath is heated up with a resistance heater 104. Tests can be performed at temperatures between room temperature and about 95° C. The upper limit is defined by the inability to prevent water escaping from the cement as vapor, since the device is not pressure-tight. Two thermocouples are placed near the heater and near the cement sample. They are connected to the heater power supply box and are used to maintain a fixed set-point temperature.
Two general modes of operation can be used with the expansion cell: fixed displacement of the piston (in which case the compressive load is measured) and fixed load applied to the piston (in which case the displacement of the piston is measured). The experiments reported here were conducted in fixed displacement mode.
To simulate hydration of cement placed against a permeable formation containing water, a porous ceramic disk 105 that was saturated with water was placed on top of the cement sample 106, with a layer of filter paper between to keep the disk clean. The piston was then inserted into the cylinder until it made contact with the porous disk. Additional water 108 was poured on top of the piston, and then finally a layer of high-boiling-point silicon oil was added to prevent evaporation of the water. Holes in the piston allowed water access between the sample and reservoir. As the cement and expanding agent reacted, volume lost to chemical shrinkage was replaced by external water flowing into the slurry from above, keeping the pores of the sample saturated. To simulate hydration of cement placed against a tight formation that supplies no water to the cement, the piston was placed directly in contact with the cement and a thick layer of lubricant was used to prevent water evaporation from the specimen. In this case, chemical shrinkage desaturated the pore system, causing some shrinkage that may have been compensated by the expanding agent.
After 1 week, compressive stresses ranging from about 90-750 psi (0.6-5 MPa) had developed in the samples, with the stress level roughly proportional to the MgO concentration. The kinetics of load development did not follow the kinetics of MgO hydration. Whereas the hydration of MgO exhibited a declining rate that nearly reached a plateau after a several days, the load development was still increasing strongly after one week.
One confinement test was also performed with 14% BWOC of the more reactive expanding agent consisting of a blend of hard-burned CaO and MgO (
The effect of water availability on the development of expansive stress within the cement was also explored, as shown in
The same comparison for 25% bwoc MgO (
An apparatus was built to study the acoustic response of cement systems or additives in different controlled configurations in an annular geometry typical of a wellbore (
A laboratory version of an Ultrasonic Imager Tool (USIT), available from Schlumberger, may be placed inside the inner casing. This tool consists of a piezoelectric transducer mounted on a control arm that can move the transducer both axially and azimuthally. The transducer operates between 250-750 kHz and is designed for use at ambient pressure. With this setup, the acoustic impedance of the annulus at different locations can be measured, and an impedance map of the entire annulus can be generated. High impedance indicates that cement is well bonded to the inner casing, while low impedance values indicate poor bonding or the presence of a microannulus. This logging setup has a vertical resolution of about 25 mm and an azimuthal resolution of approximately 5°.
After preparing a slurry as described earlier, the slurry was pumped slowly into the annulus from below. A layer of silicone oil was poured on top of the slurry to prevent drying. No external water was provided to the cement. Immediately after placement of the cement slurry in the annulus, the inner casing was pressurized hydraulically to 3000 psi [20.7 MPa] using a pressure sleeve. The purpose of this step was to allow a drop in casing pressure to be simulated at later times after the cement has set, by removing the hydraulic pressure. Such a step will often cause the cement to debond from the casing. Because the logging tool and pressure sleeve could not be inside the casing at the same time, logging of the annulus was begun only after the pressure sleeve was removed.
The logging procedure allowed the acoustic impedance of the annulus material to be characterized over a vertical distance of 250 mm and the entire 360° azimuthal angle. These measurements were converted into an impedance map of the annulus material, as shown by an example in
A series of two experiments using the logging apparatus of
The apparatus of Example 2 (
For both experiments, the device was first heated to 30° C. and then the slurry was poured into place. While the slurry was still liquid, the casing was expanded mechanically to the equivalent of 9 MPa. The cement was cured for 24 h at 30° C., and then heated to 85° C. for 8 h, and then further cured at 30° C. until the cement was 48 h old. At that point, the casing pressure was removed (causing the casing to contract), the apparatus was allowed to cool to 23° C., and the logging commenced. The purpose of the 8-h heat treatment at 85° C. was to generate additional pre-stress from the MgO present in the expanding agent; however, it was also applied to the neat cement system to provide a valid control experiment. The pre-stress level was measured independently at around 3.5 MPa (
Logging experiments were conducted in the apparatus after the pressure decrease and at later times.
Although various embodiments have been described with respect to enabling disclosures, it is to be understood that this document is not limited to the disclosed embodiments. Variations and modifications that would occur to one of skill in the art upon reading the specification are also within the scope of the disclosure, which is defined in the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
14305938 | Jun 2014 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2015/035919 | 6/16/2015 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/195596 | 12/23/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1265655 | Henderson et al. | May 1918 | A |
1344461 | Thomas et al. | Jun 1920 | A |
1394273 | Carrier et al. | Oct 1921 | A |
1852696 | Chaffee et al. | Apr 1932 | A |
2329148 | van Leeuwen | Sep 1943 | A |
2465278 | Schenker et al. | Mar 1949 | A |
3221548 | Wilson et al. | Dec 1965 | A |
3265151 | Anderson et al. | Aug 1966 | A |
3303461 | Edwards et al. | Feb 1967 | A |
3308426 | Wilson et al. | Mar 1967 | A |
3691518 | Schuster | Sep 1972 | A |
3696884 | Lafleur | Oct 1972 | A |
3811529 | Crawford | May 1974 | A |
3884710 | Allen et al. | May 1975 | A |
3952741 | Baker | Apr 1976 | A |
4002483 | Daugherty et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4205994 | Moyer, Jr. et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4255798 | Havira | Mar 1981 | A |
4328038 | Briggs | May 1982 | A |
4332619 | Gandy et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4391329 | Gallus | Jul 1983 | A |
4419136 | Rice | Dec 1983 | A |
4495606 | Smith | Jan 1985 | A |
4607698 | Wood | Aug 1986 | A |
4741401 | Walles et al. | May 1988 | A |
4757479 | Masson et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4797159 | Spangle | Jan 1989 | A |
4871179 | Bell et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4893285 | Masson et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4986354 | Cantu et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5118527 | Wilson | Jun 1992 | A |
5275654 | Cowan | Jan 1994 | A |
5650004 | Yon | Jul 1997 | A |
5741357 | Sheikh | Apr 1998 | A |
5942031 | Cheung | Aug 1999 | A |
6105673 | Harris et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6209646 | Reddy et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6675895 | Shehab | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6743470 | Pellerite et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6909969 | Calvert et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6966376 | Vaeth et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7150317 | Barolak et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7156174 | Roddy et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7494544 | Go Boncan | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7525872 | Tang et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7663969 | Tang et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7670627 | Shefer et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7712530 | Edgley et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
7722954 | Santra et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7773454 | Barolak et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7988782 | Rice et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8157008 | Lilley | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8273426 | Laramay et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8336620 | Williams et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
20010026863 | Hirano et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020037306 | Van Koppenhagen et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020166698 | Beato et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030156494 | McDaniel et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030216866 | Edward Calvert et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040109894 | Shefer et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040147406 | Go Boncan | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040168801 | Reddy et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040234597 | Shefer et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050123596 | Kohane et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050167107 | Roddy | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050190648 | Tang et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050205248 | Barolak et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050234649 | Calvert et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060162930 | Gronsveld et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060198243 | Tang et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060269752 | Holland et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070206439 | Barolak et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070219758 | Bloomfield | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080073082 | Thiercelin | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080131709 | Hanson et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20100126718 | Lilley | May 2010 | A1 |
20110048701 | Williams et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110240302 | Coludrovich | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120018154 | James | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120080184 | Jahangir | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120175118 | Khatri et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120188236 | Legendre et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120247774 | Li et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130065755 | Taylor et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130161006 | Robisson | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20140052376 | Guo | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140102704 | Patil et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140121136 | Mirakyan et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140144634 | Nguyen | May 2014 | A1 |
20150107493 | Rice | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20160032706 | Bornaz et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20170121587 | Allouche et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170349805 | Muss et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20190161669 | Droger et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
104692694 | Jun 2015 | CN |
3704783 | Aug 1988 | DE |
19801610 | Jul 1999 | DE |
0073335 | Mar 1983 | EP |
0098778 | Jan 1984 | EP |
0254342 | Jan 1988 | EP |
0098778 | Mar 1989 | EP |
1275983 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1464959 | Oct 2004 | EP |
1698912 | Sep 2006 | EP |
2113546 | Nov 2009 | EP |
2169027 | Mar 2010 | EP |
2246408 | Nov 2010 | EP |
2615151 | Jul 2013 | EP |
2676944 | Dec 2013 | EP |
S5841756 | Mar 1983 | JP |
2009263164 | Nov 2009 | JP |
2452758 | Jun 2012 | RU |
WO1988004729 | Jun 1988 | WO |
9322537 | Nov 1993 | WO |
WO1997030246 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO2002087959 | Nov 2002 | WO |
03048526 | Jun 2003 | WO |
03106809 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO2004088302 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2005030174 | Apr 2005 | WO |
2005061846 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO2005089458 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2007041420 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2008034461 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO2008047107 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2010140032 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO2010141037 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO2011126667 | Oct 2011 | WO |
WO2012027334 | Oct 2011 | WO |
WO2012177262 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2013023949 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2015047301 | Apr 2015 | WO |
2015195596 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2017137788 | Aug 2017 | WO |
2017137789 | Aug 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Brufatto et al., “From Mud to Cement—Building Gas Wells”: Oilfield Review Autumn 2003, p. 62-p. 76. |
Zhen—New Cementing Technologies Successfully Solved the problems in shallow Gas, Low Temperature and Easy Leakage Formations, SPE131810—CPS/SPE International Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition in China held in Beijing, China, Jun. 8-10, 2010 (17 pages). |
Moroni et al., Achieving Long-tern isolation for thin gas zones in the Adriatic sea region, SPE92193—SPE Western Regional Meeting held in Irvine, CA, U.S.A., Mar. 30-Apr. 1, 2005 (11 pages). |
Robert Van Kuijk et al: “A Novel Ultrasonic Cased-Hole Imager for Enhanced Cement Evaluation”, Proceedings of International Petroleum Technology Conference, Jan. 1, 2005, (14 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in the related PCT application PCT/US2015/035919, dated Sep. 24, 2015 (9 pages). |
Boukhelifa et al., Evaluation of Cement Systems for Oil and Gas Wells Zonal Isolation in a Full-Scale Annular Geometry, SPE 87195—IADC/SPE Drilling Conference held in Dallas, Texas, U.S.A., Mar. 2-4, 2004 (15 pages). |
Belrute et al.,—Attenuation of Casing Cemented with Conventional and Expanding Cements Across Heavy-Oil and Sandstone Formations, SPE18027—SPE Drilling Engineering, Sep. 1992 (7 pages). |
Jin et al., “Preparation, characterization and application of octadecyl modified magnesium oxide microspheres”, Analytica Chemica Acta, vol. 693, pp. 54-61, 2011. |
Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS), US, Mar. 25, 1991, XP000193363, ISSN: 0009-2258, abstract, p. 353. |
International Search Report issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2016/000261 dated Jan. 12, 2016; 7 pages. |
Written Opinion issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2016/000261 dated Jan. 12, 2016; 12 pages. |
Wicks et al., “Modeling and Field Trials of the Effective Tractoring Force of Axial Vibration Tools”, SPE 170327, SPE Deepwater Drilling and Completions Conference, Sep. 10-11, 2014, 11 pages. |
Musso et al., “Expanding Cement Compositions”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/307,430 (unpublished) filed on Jun. 17, 2014; 20 pages. |
American Concrete Institute 223R-10 Guide for the Use of Shrinkage-Compensating Concrete, 2010. |
Van Kuijk et al., “A Novel Ultrasonic Cased-Hole Imager for Enhanced Cement Evaluation”, IPTC 10546, Proceedings of International Petroleum Technology Conference, Jan. 1, 2005, 14 pages. |
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 16/091,778 dated Sep. 3, 2019, 10 pages. |
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 16/077,174 dated Mar. 8, 2021; 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170121587 A1 | May 2017 | US |