Computation of electrical properties of an IC layout

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7712068
  • Patent Number
    7,712,068
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, December 19, 2006
    18 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 4, 2010
    15 years ago
Abstract
A system for calculating electrical properties of features to be created in an integrated circuit. All or a portion of a desired layout design is corrected for photolithographic or other process distortions using one or more resolution enhancement techniques. A simulated layout image of a corrected layout is used as an input to a field solver program that calculates the electrical properties of the features as they will be printed on a wafer.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In the design of integrated circuits, it is important to be able to estimate the electrical properties of the various circuit features. Such electrical properties typically include resistance of conductors and capacitances between various circuit features. In areas of the circuit where timing is critical, the electrical properties must be accurately predicted if the circuit is to operate properly.


In conventional integrated circuit processing, a chip manufacturer provides data that is used in estimating the electrical properties. Such data may include the thickness and dielectric constants of the various layers of the integrated circuit as well as the minimum spacing and minimum size of the features that can be created on the circuit. In addition, the manufacturer may provide a general distortion factor by which circuit features created on a wafer differ from their desired size. For example, during processing, some features may be smaller than desired, while others may be larger than desired. This general distortion factor and other process data are used by a field solver program to estimate the electrical properties of the features in an integrated circuit to be manufactured.


The above approach works quite well for an integrated circuit designs where the pattern of features created on a wafer closely matches the desired layout pattern. However, the technique can produce errors for designs whereby process distortions cause the pattern created on a wafer to vary significantly from the desired layout pattern.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

To address the above-discussed problems, the present invention is a technique for improving the accuracy of integrated circuit electrical simulations by taking into account photolithographic and other distortions that may occur during processing.


In one embodiment of the invention, an integrated circuit layout design defines a number of features to be created on wafer. The layout design, or portion thereof, is corrected with one or more resolution enhancement techniques (RETs) such as optical and process correction (OPC) to improve the fidelity of the features to be created on a wafer. A print image simulation is performed on the corrected layout that estimates how the features of the IC design will be formed on a wafer. The simulated layout image is then used as an input to a field solver program to estimate the electrical properties of the integrated circuit features.


This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This summary is not intended to identify key features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing aspects and many of the attendant advantages of this invention will become more readily appreciated as the same become better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:



FIG. 1 illustrates a conventional process for determining electrical properties of features in an integrated circuit design;



FIG. 2 illustrates a process for determining electrical properties of features in an integrated circuit design in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 3 illustrates a desired layout pattern and a simulated layout image of the desired layout pattern;



FIG. 4 illustrates a hierarchical organization of a layout design and corresponding sets of polygons defining features in various layers of an integrated circuit; and



FIG. 5 illustrates a representative computer system for implementing the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

As indicated above, the present invention is a system for improving the accuracy of estimated electrical properties of features to be created in an integrated circuit.



FIG. 1 illustrates a conventional technique for estimating the electrical properties of features to be created in an integrated circuit (IC). With this technique, a process file 10 is received from an integrated circuit manufacturer. The process file 10 includes a number of parameters from the manufacturer that are required to estimate the electrical properties of the circuit features defined by an IC layout design. These parameters may include the thicknesses of the various layers in an integrated circuit as well as dielectric constants of the various layers. In addition, the process file may include the minimum spacing between features of the integrated circuit as well as the minimum feature size. These and other commonly used circuit parameters are used by a model generator 30 in conjunction with a field solver program 20 such as Raphael available from Synopsys, Quickcap available from Magma, Maxewell available from Ansoft, MCS2/MCS3 available from Mentor Graphics to develop equations or models that estimate the electrical properties of the various circuit features. The equations or models produced by the model generator 30 may be stored in a library 40 that is accessed by computer program to estimate the electrical properties of the various features in an entire layout design.


To estimate the electrical properties of the features in the layout design, a computer program receives all or a portion of a desired or target layout design 60 and analyzes the features with a full chip extraction program 70. The full chip extraction program 70 analyzes the features to be created in each layer of the integrated circuit to determine the electrical interactions between features in the same layer and between features in different layers of the integrated circuit. The full chip extraction program 70 interacts with the model library 40 to produce estimates of the electrical properties such as the resistance, capacitance or inductance of the various circuit features. The output of the full chip extraction program 70 is a netlist 80 that can be used by electrical circuit modeling programs, such as SPICE™ or others, to determine the electrical behavior of the circuit.


The system shown in FIG. 1 works quite well for photolithographic systems where the feature shapes defined in the desired layout closely match what is created on the wafer. However in photolithographic systems where the features to be created on a wafer are smaller than the wavelength of light used to expose the wafer, or where the features are placed very close to each other, optical and other process distortions may occur. For these types of layouts, the features patterns defined by the desired layout may bear little resemblance to how the features will be created on a wafer. For features that are distorted on a wafer, using the description of the features in the layout file to estimate the electrical properties of the features can lead to inaccuracies.



FIG. 2 illustrates one system for calculating the electrical properties of features to be created in an integrated circuit in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In the embodiment shown, at least a portion of the desired integrated circuit layout design 60 is read and supplied to a resolution enhancement technique (RET) tool such as an optical and process correction (OPC) engine 100 that compensates for distortions that may occur during the photolithographic printing process. Such distortions may include optical distortions or process distortions such as etch effects, etc. In general, the OPC engine 100 operates to modify one or more features in the layout design by biasing the edges of the features either inwards or outwards to precompensate for the anticipated process distortions. The OPC engine 100 receives information from an optical and process model 105 that realistically captures the properties of the optical systems and processes that a manufacturer uses to produce a design on a silicon wafer. Inputs to the optical and process model 105 include optical parameters such as the numerical aperture, wavelength and illumination pattern used in the photolithographic tools. In addition, the optical and process model can be calibrated by comparing a desired test pattern with measurements made from a wafer on which the test pattern is formed. In one embodiment, CALIBRE™ Workbench Model Center available from Mentor Graphics of Wilsonville, Oreg., the assignee of the present invention, can be used to build the optical and process model 105. With the OPC correction, the features formed on a wafer will more closely match the desired target layout design. One suitable OPC engine 100 is the CALIBRE™ software suite available from Mentor Graphics.


The output of the OPC engine 100 is an OPC-corrected layout 120. The OPC-corrected layout 120 is analyzed by a print image simulation engine 130 such as Mentor Graphic's PRINT IMAGE function within CALIBRE that simulates how the features in the corrected layout design will be created on a wafer. In one embodiment, the print image simulation engine 130 interacts with the optical and process model 105 to simulate the photolithographic process that will be used to create the integrated circuit. The output of the print image simulation engine 130 is a simulated layout image 140 that defines a number of features as they will be created on a wafer. Typically, each feature in the simulated layout image 140 is defined as a polygon having a somewhat irregular shape due to the photolithographic and other process distortions. To estimate the electrical properties of the features as they will be created on the wafer, the features defined in the simulated layout image 140 are provided to the field solver program 150. The field solver 150 produces a netlist 80 defining individual parasitic capacitances, resistances or inductances for use by an electrical circuit simulation program.


The field solver program 150 may be the same as the field solver program 20 described above. However, the field solver should be able to handle the complex shapes of the features defined in simulated layout image. Such field solvers include the solvers base on the finite element method or the boundary element method. In one embodiment of the invention, the field solver program 150 is a finite element field solver program such as Maxewell available from Ansoft, MCS2/MCS3 available from Mentor Graphics.


In one embodiment of the invention, only a selected portion of the desired integrated circuit layout design 60 is subjected to the OPC engine 100 and used by the field solver program 150 to generate the netlist 80. However, if time and processing power permits, the entire desired layout design could be analyzed in this manner.


For those circuit features that are either larger in size, are not critical to the operation of the circuit or are not subject to such process distortions, the electrical properties of the features may be estimated using the process file 10, the field solver program 20, the model generator 30, the model library 40 and the full chip extraction tool 70 as described above.



FIG. 3 illustrates an example of a desired layout design 200 and a corresponding simulated layout image 250. The desired layout design 200 includes a number of features that are defined as a sequence of polygon vertices 202 in a layout description language such as GDSII™ or OASIS™. The desired layout design 200 may be defined hierarchically, whereby circuit features or groups of circuit features that are repeated in the layout design are defined as cells in the database along with references to each placement of the cells.


As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, photolithographic and other distortions often cause errors such that what is actually created on a wafer does not match the desired layout. Depending on the extent of the distortions, the circuit features may not operate as the circuit designer intended or may not operate at all.


To correct for the photolithographic distortions, the OPC correction engine 100 alters one or more of the polygons defined by the desired layout design so that what is created on the wafer more closely matches the desired layout. OPC engine 100 generally operates by dividing the edges of the polygons into a number of edge fragments and selectively biasing one or more of the edge fragments inwards or outwards to improve the fidelity of the feature created on the wafer. In addition, extra features such as hammerheads, serifs, or other patterns can be added to the layout features to improve their fidelity. In some cases, the resolution enhancement techniques may add additional features such as subresolution assist features (SRAFs) or phase shifters that are used to improve image fidelity. The simulated layout image 250 shown in FIG. 3 as determined by the print image function represents the features that will be created on a wafer from an OPC-corrected layout. The polygons defining the features as they will be formed on a wafer generally include a larger number of vertices 252 to define the irregular boundaries of the features.


In some embodiments, the field solver program 150 requires a particular description of a circuit layout in order to be able to compute the various electrical properties of the features in the layout. In one embodiment of the invention, the simulated layout image produced by the print image function is defined hierarchically such as shown in FIG. 4. A hierarchical layout description includes a top cell T and a number of subcells C1, C2, C3, . . . , C10. Each of the subcells defines a pattern of features (e.g., polygons) to be created on a wafer. Some field solver programs 150 require the feature polygons to be defined on a layer-by-layer basis such as a list of all the features in the poly layer, the diffusion 1 layer, the diffusion region 2 layer, the contact layer, the metal 1 layer, the metal 2 layer, etc. To convert the hierarchical description of the simulated layout image into a layer-by-layer format that the field solver program 150 can understand, the hierarchical description of the simulated layout image is analyzed to determine which features are in which layer of the integrated circuit. In one embodiment, a recursive tree searching algorithm is used to retrieve those features in each layer and to define files or other data collections for each layer of the integrated circuit.


The following is an example of an output file that defines a number of polygons in a simulated layout image. The file is ready by the field solver program 150 to estimate the electrical properties of the features. In the embodiment shown, each polygon is defined by the number of vertices in the polygon followed by the location of each vertex on a layout grid used by the field solver.

    • polygon 4
      • −0.070000 1.005000 0.070000 1.005000 0.070000 1.420000 −0.070000 1.420000
    • polygon 4
      • 0.375000 1.005000 0.630000 1.005000 0.630000 1.235000 0.375000 1.235000
    • polygon 14
      • 0.010000 0.740000 1.010000 0.740000 1.010000 1.010000 1.210000 1.010000 1.210000 1.230000 1.010000 1.230000 1.010000 1.530000 0.530000 1.530000 0.530000 1.810000 0.310000 1.810000 0.310000 1.410000 0.890000 1.410000 0.890000 0.860000 0.010000 0.860000
    • polygon 8
      • −0.200000 −0.070000 1.600000 −0.070000 1.600000 0.320000 1.040000 0.320000 1.040000 0.410000 0.820000 0.410000 0.820000 0.320000 −0.200000 0.320000
    • polygon 16
      • −0.200000 2.200000 0.020000 2.200000 0.020000 1.865000 −0.050000 1.865000 −0.050000 1.745000 0.170000 1.745000 0.170000 1.865000 0.160000 1.865000 0.160000 2.200000 0.820000 2.200000 0.820000 1.850000 1.040000 1.850000 1.040000 2.200000 1.600000 2.200000 1.600000 2.590000 −0.200000 2.590000
    • polygon 16
      • 1.250000 0.740000 1.470000 0.740000 1.470000 0.860000 1.450000 0.860000 1.450000 1.005000 1.470000 1.005000 1.470000 1.235000 1.450000 1.235000 1.450000 1.410000 1.470000 1.410000 1.470000 1.810000 1.250000 1.810000 1.250000 1.410000 1.330000 1.410000 1.330000 0.860000 1.250000 0.860000


The field solver program 150 computes the resistances of the various features as well as the capacitances between features from the files defining the features in the various circuit layers. Because the polygons in the simulated layout image of the OPC-corrected features accurately reflect the shape of the features as they will be formed on the wafer, the estimates of the electrical properties is more accurate than if the properties were computed from the desired layout directly. The netlist of the electrical properties computed for the OPC-corrected layout can be combined with one or more netlists created from the non-OPC-corrected layout data in order to simulate the electrical operation of the entire IC design.



FIG. 5 illustrates a representative computer system 300 that can be used to implement the present invention. A computer 302 receives a set of programmed instructions on a computer readable media 304 such as a CD-ROM, DVD, tape or computer communication link. The computer executes the instructions to read all or a portion of a desired layout from a database 306 or other storage media. The computer than performs one or more resolution enhancement techniques such as OPC to correct a portion of the desired layout for process distortions. The corrected layout data is used to generate a simulated layout image, which in turn is used to calculate the electrical properties of the features in the manner described above.


The computer 302 may be a stand alone or networked device. In addition, the computer 302 may be connected to other computers 324 through a communication link 320 such as the Internet. Processing of the layout may be distributed between connected computers.


While illustrative embodiments have been illustrated and described, it will be appreciated that various changes can be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: receiving a target layout design defining features to be created in an integrated circuit or portion thereof;producing a corrected layout of at least a portion of the target layout design including one or more of the features that are compensated for process distortions using one or more resolution enhancement techniques;producing a simulated corrected layout image by simulating how the features in the corrected layout will be formed on a wafer; andusing a computer producing a representation of electrical properties of the features in the corrected layout based on the simulated corrected layout image and using a field solver.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the simulated corrected layout image comprises polygons representing how the features in the corrected layout will be formed on the wafer and the electrical properties of the features in the corrected layout are computed by applying the polygons of the simulated corrected layout image to a finite element field solver.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more resolution enhancement techniques are implemented using an optical and process correction (OPC) tool.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 wherein the representation of the electrical properties comprises a portion of a netlist stored in a computer-readable medium.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising: producing a representation of electrical properties of features in at least one uncorrected portion of the target layout design; andcombining the representation of the electrical properties of the features in the at least one uncorrected portion of the target layout design with the representation of the electrical properties of the features in the corrected layout.
  • 6. A computer-readable storage device storing a sequence of instructions that is executable by a computer to perform a method, the method comprising: receiving a target layout design defining features to be created in an integrated circuit or portion thereof;producing a corrected layout of at least a portion of the target layout design including one or more of the features that are compensated for process distortions using one or more resolution enhancement techniques;producing a simulated corrected layout image by simulating how the features in the corrected layout will be formed on a wafer; andproducing a representation of electrical properties of the features in the corrected layout based on the simulated corrected layout image and using a field solver.
  • 7. A system comprising: a computer configured to execute a sequence of programmed instructions that causes the computer to: receive a target layout design defining features to be created in an integrated circuit or portion thereof;produce a corrected layout of at least a portion of the target layout design including features that are compensated for process distortions using one or more resolution enhancement techniques;produce a simulated corrected layout image by simulating how the features in the corrected layout will be formed on a wafer; andcompute the electrical properties of the features in the corrected layout based on the simulated corrected layout image and using a field solver.
  • 8. The method of claim 5, wherein the combining produces a portion of a netlist stored in a computer-readable medium.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the portion of the netlist describes individual capacitances, resistances, or inductances.
  • 10. The method of claim 8, further comprising simulating the electrical operation of the integrated circuit using the netlist.
  • 11. The method of claim 5, wherein the representation of the electrical properties of the features of the at least one uncorrected portion of the target layout design is produced using a full chip extraction program.
  • 12. The computer-readable storage device of claim 6, wherein the simulated corrected layout image comprises polygons representing how the features in the corrected layout will be formed on the wafer and the electrical properties of the features in the corrected layout are computed by applying the polygons of the simulated corrected layout image to the field solver.
  • 13. The computer-readable storage device of claim 6, wherein the one or more resolution enhancement techniques are implemented using an optical and process correction (OPC) tool.
  • 14. The computer-readable medium of claim 6, wherein the representation of the electrical properties comprises a portion of a netlist.
  • 15. The computer-readable storage device of claim 14, further comprising simulating the electrical operation of the integrated circuit using the netlist.
  • 16. The computer-readable storage device of claim 6, wherein the method further comprises: producing a representation of electrical properties of features in at least one uncorrected portion of the target layout design; andcombining the representation of the electrical properties of the features in the at least one uncorrected portion of the target layout design with the representation of the electrical properties of the features in the corrected layout.
  • 17. The computer-readable storage device of claim 16, wherein the combining produces a netlist stored in a computer-readable medium.
  • 18. The computer-readable storage device of claim 17, wherein the portion of the netlist describes individual capacitances, resistances, or inductances.
  • 19. A method for computing electrical properties of features in an integrated circuit layout design, comprising: receiving a target layout design defining features to be created in an integrated circuit or portion thereof;producing a corrected layout including one or more of the features that are compensated for photolithographic process distortions with one or more resolution enhancement techniques;producing a simulated corrected layout image by simulating how the features in the corrected layout will be formed on a wafer;using a description of the simulated corrected layout image as an input to a field solver to compute the electrical properties of the features using a computer;computing electrical properties for uncorrected features in the target layout design; andcombining the electrical properties of the uncorrected features with the electrical properties of the features defined by the corrected layout.
  • 20. The method of claim 19, wherein the combined electrical properties are stored in a netlist.
CROSS-REFERENCE(S) TO RELATED APPLICATION(S)

The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Nos. 60/774,334, filed Feb. 17, 2006, and 60/789,704, filed Apr. 5, 2006, which are herein expressly incorporated by reference.

US Referenced Citations (132)
Number Name Date Kind
4532650 Wihl et al. Jul 1985 A
4762396 Dumant et al. Aug 1988 A
5381343 Bamji et al. Jan 1995 A
5396584 Lee et al. Mar 1995 A
5452224 Smith, Jr. et al. Sep 1995 A
5502654 Sawahata Mar 1996 A
5566083 Fang Oct 1996 A
5610833 Chang et al. Mar 1997 A
5629860 Jones et al. May 1997 A
5723233 Garza et al. Mar 1998 A
5790416 Norton et al. Aug 1998 A
5815685 Kamon Sep 1998 A
5825647 Tsudaka Oct 1998 A
5879844 Yamamoto et al. Mar 1999 A
5901063 Chang et al. May 1999 A
5991006 Tsudaka Nov 1999 A
5999726 Ho Dec 1999 A
6016357 Neary et al. Jan 2000 A
6033814 Burdorf et al. Mar 2000 A
6038020 Tsukuda Mar 2000 A
6042257 Tsudaka Mar 2000 A
6047116 Murakami et al. Apr 2000 A
6049660 Ahn et al. Apr 2000 A
6056785 Chisaka May 2000 A
6077310 Yamamoto et al. Jun 2000 A
6080527 Huang et al. Jun 2000 A
6099581 Sakai Aug 2000 A
6120952 Pierrat et al. Sep 2000 A
6128067 Hashimoto Oct 2000 A
6175947 Ponnapalli et al. Jan 2001 B1
6187483 Capodieci et al. Feb 2001 B1
6226781 Nistler et al. May 2001 B1
6230299 McSherry et al. May 2001 B1
6243855 Kobayashi et al. Jun 2001 B1
6249904 Cobb Jun 2001 B1
6263299 Aleshin et al. Jul 2001 B1
6269472 Garza et al. Jul 2001 B1
6289412 Yuan et al. Sep 2001 B1
6301697 Cobb Oct 2001 B1
6314545 Kapur et al. Nov 2001 B1
6363516 Cano et al. Mar 2002 B1
6370679 Chang et al. Apr 2002 B1
6415421 Anderson et al. Jul 2002 B2
6425113 Anderson et al. Jul 2002 B1
6425117 Pasch et al. Jul 2002 B1
6430737 Cobb et al. Aug 2002 B1
6438729 Ho Aug 2002 B1
6449754 You et al. Sep 2002 B1
6453452 Chang et al. Sep 2002 B1
6453457 Pierrat et al. Sep 2002 B1
6467076 Cobb Oct 2002 B1
6470489 Chang et al. Oct 2002 B1
6499003 Jones et al. Dec 2002 B2
6499131 Savithri et al. Dec 2002 B1
6526549 You Feb 2003 B1
6536021 Keller et al. Mar 2003 B2
6560766 Pierrat et al. May 2003 B2
6574784 Lippincott et al. Jun 2003 B1
6620561 Winder et al. Sep 2003 B2
6625611 Teig et al. Sep 2003 B1
6637010 Yamamoto Oct 2003 B2
6643616 Granik et al. Nov 2003 B1
6643831 Chang et al. Nov 2003 B2
6649309 Mukherjee Nov 2003 B2
6668367 Cobb et al. Dec 2003 B2
6701492 Jaklic et al. Mar 2004 B2
6728946 Schellenberg et al. Apr 2004 B1
6748578 Cobb Jun 2004 B2
6792590 Pierrat et al. Sep 2004 B1
6817003 Lippincott et al. Nov 2004 B2
6857109 Lippincott Feb 2005 B2
6887633 Tang May 2005 B2
6901574 LaCour et al. May 2005 B2
6928634 Granik et al. Aug 2005 B2
6931613 Kauth et al. Aug 2005 B2
6973633 Lippincott et al. Dec 2005 B2
7010776 Gallatin et al. Mar 2006 B2
7013439 Robles et al. Mar 2006 B2
7017141 Anderson et al. Mar 2006 B2
7024655 Cobb Apr 2006 B2
7028284 Cobb et al. Apr 2006 B2
7047516 Futatsuya May 2006 B2
7069534 Sahouria et al. Jun 2006 B2
7073162 Cobb et al. Jul 2006 B2
7089511 Allen et al. Aug 2006 B2
7093206 Anand et al. Aug 2006 B2
7124380 Keller et al. Oct 2006 B2
7155689 Pierrat et al. Dec 2006 B2
7155699 Cobb Dec 2006 B2
7172838 Maurer et al. Feb 2007 B2
7174531 Schellenberg et al. Feb 2007 B2
7181721 Lippincott et al. Feb 2007 B2
7194704 Kotani et al. Mar 2007 B2
7237221 Granik et al. Jun 2007 B2
7240305 Lippincott Jul 2007 B2
7240321 Cobb et al. Jul 2007 B2
7269804 Tabery et al. Sep 2007 B2
7281234 Lippincott Oct 2007 B2
7293249 Robles et al. Nov 2007 B2
7324930 Cobb Jan 2008 B2
7367009 Cobb et al. Apr 2008 B2
7412675 Kauth et al. Aug 2008 B2
20020026621 Mukai Feb 2002 A1
20020100005 Anderson et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020104063 Chang et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020112216 Keller et al. Aug 2002 A1
20030005400 Karniewicz Jan 2003 A1
20030192013 Cote et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040010762 Habitz Jan 2004 A1
20040044984 Keogan et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040128643 Buechner et al. Jul 2004 A1
20050149901 Tang Jul 2005 A1
20050204322 Kotani et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050229125 Tabery et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050251771 Robles Nov 2005 A1
20050278686 Word et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050283747 Adam Dec 2005 A1
20060005154 Cobb et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060188796 Word Aug 2006 A1
20060199084 Word Sep 2006 A1
20060200790 Shang et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060236299 Sahouria et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060240342 Tang Oct 2006 A1
20060271888 Meuris et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070074143 Cobb et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070118826 Lippincott May 2007 A1
20070124708 Robles et al. May 2007 A1
20070198967 Ren et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070209030 Tabery et al. Sep 2007 A1
20080109766 Song et al. May 2008 A1
20080141195 Robles et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080148216 Chan et al. Jun 2008 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (10)
Number Date Country
09-319067 Dec 1997 JP
11-102380 Apr 1999 JP
2004-502961 Jan 2004 JP
9914637 Mar 1999 WO
9914638 Mar 1999 WO
0165315 Sep 2001 WO
0197096 Dec 2001 WO
2006127408 Nov 2006 WO
2006127438 Nov 2006 WO
2007097935 Aug 2007 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20070198967 A1 Aug 2007 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
60774334 Feb 2006 US
60789704 Apr 2006 US