The present invention relates to a computer assisted surgery system and a method for operating a computer assisted surgery system, and in particular to a computer assisted surgery system and a method for operating a computer assisted surgery system providing a virtual representation of a medical device to provide an easier application of the medical device, such as an implant or the like.
Fractures of the femoral neck, for example, may be treated by intramedullary nailing. In such treatments, a nail for intramedullary nailing typically comprises at least one bore hole for receiving a bone screw. The nail is generally introduced in the longitudinal direction of the femur, wherein the bone screw laterally extends at a certain angle with respect to the neck of the femur when the bone screw is received within the at least one bore hole. A certain problem of the surgeon is to predict the future or implanted position of such a nail or implant or parts thereof. In the past, the operator has acted in a trial and error manner to obtain a more or less optimum position of the implant. However, this may lead to a longer duration of the operation which may lead to higher stress for the patient. Further, for each trial, at least one X-ray image (e.g. a fluoroshot) is generally necessary in order to check the present position of the implant in order to evaluate its position.
“Computer assisted surgery for dynamic hip screw, using Surgix©, a novel intraoperative guiding system” by Amir Herman et al. in The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, Dec. 29, 2008; Volume 5, pages 45-50, describes a computer assisted surgery system using an image analysis technology in order to measure three-dimensional distances, visualize implant templates, and view a guided trajectory on standard fluoroscopy. A guiding system combines a set of X-ray opaque markers incorporated into transparent hardware as an aiming, positioning, and referring device. This device is attached to a guide wire. Fluoroscopic images are obtained by the surgeon and then are processed by an image processing engine which calculates a three-dimensional orientation relative to a C-arm and a drill trajectory in the image.
Further, a process for the acquisition of information intended for the insertion of a locking screw into an orifice of an endomedullary device is described in EP 1 491 151 B1. This document describes a process for the acquisition of information intended for the insertion of a locking screw into a distal locking hole of an endomedullary device. The described process includes taking two images of different orientations of the distal part of the endomedullary device using a radioscopic unit, acquisition of projection parameters, especially the position of the X-ray source and the projection plane of each image by locating a reference frame fixed on the endomedullary device and optionally another reference frame fixed on the radioscopic unit. The process further includes correcting any distortion of the images, segmenting the distal part of the endomedullary device in each image and calculating the attributes relating to the position of the device and to that of the holes, wherein the attributes comprise at least the contours of the device, its centre of gravity and its principal axis. Further, the process includes constructing the projection cone of the distal part of the device for each image, determining the intersection of the two projection cones, modelling of the endomedullary device on the basis of the intersection, determining a centre of a locking hole with the aid of the modelling and of the centres of gravity of the holes determined on the images, determining the orientation of the locking orifice in an iterative manner, and guiding of a drill tool.
U.S. Patent Publication No. 2009/0209851 filed Jan. 9, 2009, titled “STEREOTACTIC COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY METHOD AND SYSTEM” discloses a system and method of computer assisted surgery (CAS) using stereotactic navigation with three-dimensional (3D) visualization, and more specifically to a CAS system that is reactive and does not disrupt operating room workflow procedures, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The present invention provides a computer assisted surgery system and a method for operating a computer assisted surgery system allowing a simple and fast positioning of a medical device to be applied, such as an implant, for example.
According to one embodiment of the invention, there is provided a method for operating a computer assisted surgery system, the method comprising positioning of a reference body in relation to an anatomical structure, the reference body virtually representing a position of a medical device to be applied to the anatomical structure, detecting a position of the reference body in relation to the anatomical structure, superimposing the anatomical structure with a virtual representation of a medical device to be applied based on the detected position of the reference body in relation to the anatomical structure, providing rules for allowable ranges for applying the medical device in relation to the anatomical structure, modifying the position of the reference body, and optimizing the virtual position of the medical device to be applied with respect to the anatomical structure so as to obtain a best fit with respect to the rules for allowable ranges.
Thus, by using a virtual representation of a medical device to be applied, a future position of a real medical device can be predicted without the need of inserting this medical device during the phase of determining the final desired position of the medical device. Thus, the position of the medical device can be virtually optimized before inserting the medical device. This may lead to reducing the stress for the patient with respect to an incision and X-ray impact. Optimizing may include finding of the optimal location, orientation and geometry of the medical device, i.e. the implant. This optimizing may take place supported by a computer device. The reference body may be a particular add-on element as well as a medical tool having a unique geometry to identify the position thereof in imaging.
According to another embodiment of the invention, the position of a medical device includes dimensions, location, and orientation of the medical device.
Thus, the medical device can be virtually represented considering all relevant information with respect to an anatomical structure of the patient. Position may also be the geometry of the medical device, in particular out of a predetermined variety of medical devices.
According to yet another embodiment of the invention, detecting the positioned reference body in relation to an anatomical structure comprises taking two two-dimensional images from different angles and generating a three-dimensional representation based on the two two-dimensional images, and determining a spatial position of the reference body in relation to the anatomical structure based on the three-dimensional representation.
Thus, the anatomical structure as well as the virtual implant or the virtual medical device to be applied can be represented in a three-dimensional manner in order to give an overview over the correct positioning and dimensioning of the medical device to be applied.
According to still yet another embodiment of the invention, modifying may comprise rotating and/or displacing the reference body.
Thus, the reference body representing the position of the medical device can be virtually positioned with respect to the anatomical structure so as to find out the optimized position of the future positioned medical device within the rules provided, wherein the rules provide the allowable ranges for applying the medical device in relation to the anatomical structure.
According to still yet another embodiment of the invention, modifying may comprise selecting the medical device out of a predetermined group of a variety of medical devices.
Thus, for meeting the rules for allowable ranges, also the dimensions of the medical devices can be selected out of a predetermined group in order to find out an optimal implant type to be implanted, for example. The various types may have various geometries, e.g. lengths, inclination angles, and other geometric properties, corresponding to the various anatomical properties.
According to still yet another embodiment of the invention, the method of operating a computer assisted surgery system further comprises imaging the superposition of the anatomical structure and the virtual representation of the medical device to be inserted.
Thus, the surgeon is capable of in-situ controlling and monitoring of the ongoing process of the computer assisted surgery system, which may be of relevance when finally deciding whether the optimization is sufficient and to provide a final check by the surgeon in person.
According to still yet another embodiment of the invention, the position of the medical device to be applied is remote from the reference body. Preferably, the medical device is an implant. Preferably, the reference body is mountable to a medical tool, such as an aiming tool, for example.
Thus, the reference body does not have to be provided in the immediate vicinity of the medical device. Implants may be virtually represented that are not in direct vicinity of the reference body. This is particularly relevant for implants that have a final remote position with respect to an opening location of the incision. Further, also sub-implants can be virtually represented, such as a bone screw of an intramedullary nail, for example, when providing the reference body to an aiming tool.
According to still yet another embodiment of the invention, there is provided a program element, which, when being executed by a processor is adapted to carry out the inventive method for operating a computer assisted surgery system.
According to still yet another embodiment of the invention, there is provided a computer readable medium having stored the inventive program element.
Thus, the method for operating a computer assisted surgery system can be carried out on a computer and a computer program, respectively.
According to still yet another embodiment of the invention, there is provided a computer assisted surgery system comprising a reference body in relation to an anatomical structure, the reference body virtually representing a position of a medical device to be applied to the anatomical structure, a detector device being adapted for detecting a position of the reference body in relation to the anatomical structure, a database including virtual medical device information and a computation device being adapted for superimposing the anatomical structure with a virtual representation of a medical device to be applied, based on an output of the detector device and modifying the position of the reference body and optimizing the virtual position of the medical device to be applied with respect to the anatomical structure so as to obtain the best fit with respect to predetermined rules for allowable ranges for applying the medical device in relation to the anatomical structure.
Such a computer assisted surgery system allows to predict the future position of a medical device to be applied, such as an implant, for example, without the need for a trial and error procedure of a surgeon in order to meet the predetermined rules for allowable ranges for applying the medical device in relation to the anatomical structure, which rules may be provided in form of required distances, for example, to the surface of the bone, particular inclination angles between for example the longitudinal direction of the femur and the orientation of a femoral neck, and the like.
According to an embodiment of the invention, the data base includes a plurality of data sets for the medical device, wherein the data sets represent a variety of medical devices.
Thus, not only the orientation and the location of the medical device can be determined in order to meet the predetermined rules for allowable ranges, but also the dimensions of the medical device as such. This may be of relevance in particular when having a wide variety of anatomies requiring different dimensions with respect to the length, the diameter and particular angles of for example an intramedullary nail and the respective bone screws. According to an embodiment of the invention, the medical device is an implant.
According to still yet another embodiment of the invention, the system further comprises a medical tool being adapted for positioning the implant, wherein the reference body is mountable in a predefined manner to the medical tool.
Thus, the reference body may be used for representing an intramedullary nail, which is still not implanted in order to find the correct position of the intramedullary nail as well as the correct position of the future implanted bone screw before having inserted the intramedullary nail. However, the intramedullary nail may be considered as a reference body, as the intramedullary nail may have a unique form representing also the future position of a bone screw to be inserted. Thus, when having inserted the intramedullary nail being mounted to the medical tool, from the geometry of the intramedullary nail, the future position, i.e. the location, the dimension, and the orientation of the bone screw can be determined. It should be noted that the intramedullary nail can be used as a reference body representing the future position of a bone screw, for example. However, also a separate reference body can be used for representing for example the intramedullary nail, wherein such reference body may be fixed in a predetermined position to the medical tool or the nail in order to represent and predict the future position of the intramedullary nail. When knowing the geometry and orientation of the intramedullary nail, also the future position of a bone screw can be predicted by evaluating the reference body mounted to the medical tool.
It should be noted that the above described embodiments of the invention apply also for the method of operating the computer assisted surgery system, the computer assisted surgery system, the program element as well as the computer readable medium.
It should also be noted that the above feature may also be combined. The combination of the above features may also lead to synergetic effects, even if not explicitly described in detail.
These and other aspects of the present invention will become apparent from and elucidated with reference to the embodiments described hereinafter.
The present invention will be better understood on reading the following detailed description of non-limiting embodiments thereof, and on examining the accompanying drawings, in which:
In
When knowing the position of an intramedullary nail 200 with respect to the reference body, the variation of the position of the reference body, here mounted onto the medical tool 10, can be used to determine a future position of the intramedullary nail, even if the nail is not mounted to the medical tool 10. This can be seen from
When positioning the medical tool 10 onto the top of the femur bone, the modification of the position of the medical tool together with the reference body 100 allows determining a virtual representation of the later applied medical device. When having found the correct position of the medical device to be implanted, as shown in
It should be noted that according to the known geometry of the intramedullary nail and the predefined coupling of the intramedullary nail 200 to the medical tool 10 via the predefined coupling arrangement 205, 206, 15, 16, also the direction of the bone screw 210 is defined as well as the direction of the distal locking screw 220.
The reference body may also be mounted to an awl or bore tool, or to a targeting tool for representing an awl. When providing an awl with a reference body, the future position of the nail can be predicted based on the trajectory of the awl. Thus, the future position of the nail can be determined when producing the bore hole, e.g. by an awl or a drilling tool. In other words, it is possible to determine the future nail position in-situ when drilling the hole for the nail.
As shown in
It should be noted that the computer assisted surgery system may also assist in finding a better position or orientation of the reference body 100, 200. This can happen by giving detailed instructions to the surgeon in which the aiming tool direction should be moved to find the correct position. It is also possible to give a haptic feedback to the handgrip of the aiming tool, for example, so that the surgeon can directly recognize in which direction he should move the aiming tool. For this purpose respective actors can be placed to the handle or grip.
In practice stereotaxis with intra-operative X-ray imaging is used, wherein an awl 9 provided with a reference body 100 may be used to drill a bore hole for the nail, as illustrated in
In practice, an awl provided with a reference body may be used to drill a bore hole for the nail. When having entered the bone for a certain distance, the trajectory of the awl is substantially determined. However, slight corrections may be carried out depending on the depth of the awl. By producing two two-dimensional images, e.g. one in the AP-direction and one in the ML-direction, the anatomic structure can be visualized together with the already entered awl. The virtual representation of the nail allows to rotate and/or to translate the reference body so as to find the optimized position for the nail. The optimal nail position and optimal nail type may be determined automatically by the computation device based on the available data sets of the data-base so that the surgeon may receive a proposal for the nail position and the nail type, as well as the corresponding bone screw and/or the distal locking screw.
In another embodiment of the present invention, a computer program or a computer program element is provided that is characterized by being adapted to execute the method steps of the method according to one of the preceding embodiments, on an appropriate system.
The computer program element might therefore be stored on a computer unit, which might also be part of an embodiment of the present invention. This computing unit may be adapted to perform or induce a performing of the steps of the method described above. Moreover, it may be adapted to operate the components of the above described apparatus. The computing unit can be adapted to operate automatically and/or to execute the orders of a user. A computer program may be loaded into a working memory of a data processor. The data processor may thus be equipped to carry out the method of the invention.
This embodiment of the invention covers both, a computer program that right from the beginning uses the invention and a computer program that by means of an up-date turns an existing program into a program that uses the invention.
Further on, the computer program element might be able to provide all necessary steps to fulfill the procedure of an embodiment of the method as described above.
According to a further embodiment of the present invention, a computer readable medium, such as a CD-ROM, is presented wherein the computer readable medium has a computer program element stored on it which computer program element is described by the preceding section.
However, the computer program may also be presented over a network like the World Wide Web and can be downloaded into the working memory of a data processor from such a network. According to a further embodiment of the present invention, a medium for making a computer program element available for downloading is provided, which computer program element is arranged to perform a method according to one of the previously described embodiments of the invention.
It has to be noted that embodiments of the invention are described with reference to different subject matters. In particular, some embodiments are described with reference to method type claims whereas other embodiments are described with reference to the device type claims. However, a person skilled in the art will gather from the above and the following description that, unless otherwise notified, in addition to any combination of features belonging to one type of subject matter also any combination between features relating to different subject matters is considered to be disclosed with this application. However, all features can be combined providing synergetic effects that are more than the simple summation of the features.
It has to be noted that embodiments of the invention are described with reference to different subject matters. In particular, some embodiments are described with reference to apparatus type claims whereas other embodiments are described with reference to method type claims. However, a person skilled in the art will gather from the above and the following description that, unless other notified, in addition to any combination of features belonging to one type of subject matter also any combination between features relating to different subject matters, in particular between features of the apparatus type claims and features of the method type claims is considered to be disclosed with this application.
In the claims, the word “comprising” does not exclude other elements or steps, and the indefinite article “a” or “an” does not exclude a plurality. A single processor or other unit may fulfill the functions of several items re-cited in the claims. The mere fact that certain measures are re-cited in mutually different dependent claims does not indicate that a combination of these measures cannot be used to advantage.
A computer program may be stored and/or distributed on a suitable medium, such as an optical storage medium or a solid state medium supplied together with or as part of other hardware, but may also be distributed in other forms, such as via the internet or other wired or wireless telecommunication systems.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4475545 | Ender | Oct 1984 | A |
4622959 | Marcus | Nov 1986 | A |
5122141 | Simpson et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5436542 | Petelin et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5480402 | Kim | Jan 1996 | A |
5533143 | Takeo | Jul 1996 | A |
5622170 | Schulz | Apr 1997 | A |
5682886 | Delp et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5799055 | Peshkin et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5841830 | Barni et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5880976 | DiGioia, III et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6002859 | DiGioia, III et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6021343 | Foley et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6053918 | Spievack | Apr 2000 | A |
6069932 | Peshkin et al. | May 2000 | A |
6074394 | Krause | Jun 2000 | A |
6101543 | Alden et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6149592 | Yanof et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6198794 | Peshkin et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6205411 | DiGioia, III et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6221074 | Cole et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226548 | Foley et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6285902 | Kienzle, III et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6341231 | Ferre et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6370421 | Williams et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6428547 | Vilsmeier et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6450978 | Brosseau et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6470207 | Simon et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477400 | Barrick | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6503249 | Krause | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510241 | Vaillant et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6535756 | Simon et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6674883 | Wei et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6697664 | Kienzle, III et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6701174 | Krause et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711432 | Krause et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6718194 | Kienzle, III | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6725080 | Melkent et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6747646 | Gueziec et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6810280 | Strobel | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6856826 | Seeley et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6887245 | Kienzle, III et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6917827 | Kienzle, III | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6922581 | Kienzle, III | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7130676 | Barrick | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7167738 | Schweikard et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7203277 | Birkenbach et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7235076 | Pacheco | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7247157 | Prager et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
RE40176 | Peshkin et al. | Mar 2008 | E |
7392076 | Moctezuma de la Barrera | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7427200 | Noble et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7427272 | Richard et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7567834 | Clayton et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7570791 | Frank et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7726002 | Shimp et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7887545 | Fernandez et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7914532 | Shaver et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7966058 | Xue et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8090166 | Rappaport et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8611697 | Nathaniel et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
9109998 | Nathaniel et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9111180 | Rappaport et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9433390 | Nathaniel et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
20010036245 | Kienzle et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020188194 | Cosman | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040009459 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040030245 | Noble et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039259 | Krause et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040082849 | Schweikard et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040097922 | Mullaney | May 2004 | A1 |
20040171924 | Mire et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040230199 | Jansen et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243148 | Wasielewski | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040263535 | Birkenbach et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050021043 | Jansen et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027304 | Leloup et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050065617 | Moctezuma de la Barrera et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050075632 | Russell | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050288679 | Kienzle | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060015030 | Poulin et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060064095 | Senn et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064106 | Fernandez | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060084867 | Tremblay et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095040 | Schlienger et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060098851 | Shoham et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060161059 | Wilson | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173293 | Marquart et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060241416 | Marquart et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060281334 | Shin et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070038059 | Sheffer et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070038223 | Marquart et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070161929 | Maier | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070270680 | Sheffer et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080018643 | Feilkas | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080051910 | Kammerzell et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080075348 | Rappaport et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080089566 | Node-Langlois et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080119725 | Lloyd | May 2008 | A1 |
20080243191 | Tipirneni et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269596 | Revie et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281334 | Zheng et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294265 | Warkentine et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080319448 | Lavallee et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090209851 | Blau | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090234217 | Mire et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100030219 | Lerner et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100104150 | Saint Felix et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100168562 | Zhao et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110019884 | Blau | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110184477 | Dell'Oca et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110213379 | Blau et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110313418 | Nikonovas | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20130060146 | Yang et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130211244 | Nathaniel | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130322726 | Nathaniel | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20170128027 | Nathaniel et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1424673 | Jun 2003 | CN |
1203435 | May 2005 | CN |
101069640 | Nov 2007 | CN |
102005062610 | Jun 2007 | DE |
102005062611 | Jun 2007 | DE |
102007008521 | Aug 2007 | DE |
102007008522 | Aug 2007 | DE |
0738502 | Oct 1996 | EP |
1440664 | Jul 2004 | EP |
1491151 | Dec 2004 | EP |
1523950 | Apr 2005 | EP |
1859755 | Nov 2007 | EP |
1994914 | Nov 2008 | EP |
2895267 | Jun 2007 | FR |
2421187 | Jun 2006 | GB |
2000510730 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2005246059 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2008514296 | May 2008 | JP |
2010538753 | Dec 2010 | JP |
0209611 | Feb 2002 | WO |
03105659 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2003105659 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2004069040 | Aug 2004 | WO |
2005087125 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2007073733 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2007095917 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2007095918 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2007095919 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2007124099 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2009087214 | Jul 2009 | WO |
2011002903 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2012007054 | Jan 2012 | WO |
2012084056 | Jun 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Baumgaertner et al. “The Value of the Tip-Apex Distance in Predicting Failure of Fixation of Peritrochanteric Fractures of the Hip. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery”. 1995;77:1058-1064 (Year: 1995). |
Communication from EP Application No. 10153136 dated Aug. 17, 2011. |
Amir Herman et al.,The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 5; 45-50, Dec. 29, 2008. |
Jagannathan et al., Neurosurg Focus 20, 2, E9, pp. 1-6, 2006. |
International Search Report, PCT/EP2009/050210, dated Jun. 16, 2009. |
Joskowicz et al., IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway NJ, US, vol. 24, No. 5, May 1, 2005, pp. 624-635. |
PCT International Search Report PCT/EP2010/060314 dated Apr. 6, 2011. |
Thomas C. Kienzle III et al., “An Integrated CAD-Robotics System for Total Knee Replacement Surgery”, IEEE, 1993. |
Ziv Yaniv, Member, IEEE, and Leo Joskowicz, Senior Member, IEEE, Precise Robot-Assisted Guide Positioning for Distal Locking of Intramedullary Nails, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 24, No. 5, May 2005. |
Hofstetter et al., “Computer-Assisted Fluoroscopy-Based Reduction of Femoral Fractures and Antetorsion Correction”, Computer Aided Surgery 5:311-325 (2000). |
International Search Report for PCT/EP2012/004102 dated Feb. 27, 2013. |
Schulz et al., “Evidence Based Development of a Novel Lateral Fibula Plate (VariAx Fibula) Using a Real CT Bone Data Based Optimization Process During Device Development”, The Open Orthopaedics Journal, 6:1-7 (2012). |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/810,299 dated Jun. 4, 2015. |
Guoyan Zheng et al., Precise estimation of postoperative cup alignment from single standard X-ray radiograph with gonadal shielding, Proceedings of the 1Oth international conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention, Oct. 29-Nov. 2, 2007, Brisbane, Australia. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110213379 A1 | Sep 2011 | US |