Multi-level metallization is commonly used in the integrated circuit industry to interconnect various components of a circuit and a system. Metals or metal alloys, such as copper or copper alloys, are used in these structures due to their low resistivity.
First, a barrier layer 52 and a seed layer 54 are deposited over the whole structure as shown in
The process of
a) is a view similar to
Conventionally, after the Cu layer 100 has been deposited on the barrier layer overlying the insulator layer 50 as shown in
The etching, electrochemical etching, or CMP process carried out to remove Cu from the field regions 58 is conventionally performed after the annealing operation.
The present invention proposes an approach to overcome the dishing and copper (or other conductor) remnant problems mentioned by establishing a structural difference between conductor layers in different regions on the substrate surface. More specifically, the present invention relates to a particular process for fabricating conductive structures in features of an insulator layer on a substrate, to a layered structure used in such a process, and to conductive structures produced by the process. According to the process, a layer of conductive material is applied over the insulator layer so that the layer of conductive material covers field regions adjacent the features and fills in the features. A grain size differential between the conductive material which covers the field regions and the conductive material which fills in the features is then established by annealing the layer of conductive material, and excess conductive material is removed to uncover the field regions and leave the conductive structures.
The layer of conductive material is applied so as to define a first layer thickness over the field regions and a second layer thickness in and over the features. The first layer thickness and the second layer thicknesses are dimensioned such that d1≦0.5d2, with d1 being the first layer thickness and d2 being the second layer thickness. Preferably, the first and second layer thicknesses are dimensioned such that d1≦0.3d2.
According to one embodiment of the invention, the layer of conductive material over the insulator layer is applied by depositing the layer of conductive material over the insulator layer, and partially removing the layer of conductive material from over the field regions to establish a desired thickness differential between the first and second layer thicknesses. According to another embodiment of the invention, the layer of conductive material over the insulator layer is applied by depositing a planarized layer of conductive material over the insulator layer to establish a desired thickness differential between the first and second layer thicknesses.
The layered structure is used in the process and includes the insulator layer on the substrate as well as the layer of conductive material covering the field regions and filling in the features. A grain size differential between the conductive material which covers the field regions and the conductive material which fills in the features is established in the conductive material layer by annealing.
a) is a partial cross-sectional view of a patterned insulator layer grown on a substrate surface and having overlying barrier and seed layers.
b) is a view similar to
c) is a view similar to
a) is a somewhat enlarged view similar to
b) is a view similar to
c) is a view similar to
d) is a view similar to
a)–7(c) illustrate sequential operations forming part of an inventive process including use of the Cu film shown in
When the copper layer of
One way of obtaining the structure of
The un-annealed, planarized layer 100 shown in
Other commonly assigned U.S. applications which may be of interest include Ser. No. 09/466,014, titled A VERTICALLY CONFIGURED CHAMBER USED FOR MULTIPLE PROCESS; Ser. No. 09/472,523, titled WORK PIECE CARRIER HEAD FOR PLATING AND POLISHING, filed Dec. 27, 1999; Ser. No. 09/511,278, titled PAD DESIGNS AND STRUCTURES FOR A VERSATILE MATERIALS PROCESSING APPARATUS, filed Feb. 23, 2000; Ser. No. 09/544,558, titled MODIFIED PLATING SOLUTION FOR PLATING AND PLANARIZATION AND PROCESS UTILIZING SAME, filed Apr. 6, 2000; Ser. No. 09/568,584, titled ANODE ASSEMBLY FOR PLATING AND PLANARIZING A CONDUCTIVE LAYER, filed May 11, 2000; and Ser. No. 09/621,969, titled PAD DESIGNS AND STRUCTURES WITH IMPROVED FLUID DISTRIBUTION, filed Jul. 21, 2000.
It has been found that the particularly desired grain structures represented in
Once an un-annealed, planarized, copper conductor layer or film 100 as shown in
Annealing is performed to enlarge the Cu grains in the features 56 so that the grains become as large as possible and voids are eliminated. Annealing parameters (times and temperatures) can be readily determined by one of ordinary skill in the art of metallurgy. A feature depth D of about 6 μm will be presumed by way of example. It will also be assumed that sufficient un-annealed, planarized, copper conductor film 100 has been deposited so that d1 in
Assuming again that copper is the conductor deposited on the patterned insulator, annealing can be performed over temperatures ranging, for example, from about 85° C. to about 250° C. These temperatures are not to be considered limiting. Air may be used as an ambient atmosphere when annealing is performed in a temperature range of about 85° C.–110° C. In this temperature range, annealing can be performed for one hour or more. At higher temperatures, up to about 250° C., annealing will commonly be performed in an inert or reducing atmosphere to avoid oxidation. At temperatures of about 200° C.–250° C., annealing can be performed for shorter times of, for example, 1–5 minutes. These times are not to be considered limiting. In the range of temperatures between about 110° C. and 200° C., again, annealing will commonly be performed in an inert or reducing atmosphere. As an example, at a temperature of about 150° C., the copper film 100 could be annealed for approximately one-half hour. Annealing times, however, will depend on the copper conductor film thickness and can be determined by one of ordinary skill in the art of metallurgy without undue experimentation.
After annealing, with the Cu film thicknesses d1 and d2 having the relationship mentioned above, the grain structure represented in
Various well known chemical compositions are used as etchants and electroetchants for different types of metal films. These compositions are well known to those of ordinary skill in the art of metallurgy. As examples of these well known compositions, for copper, solutions of H2SO4 (sulphuric acid) and H2O2 (hydrogen peroxide) are commonly used as etchants, while, typically, milder acids, such as H3PO4 (phosphoric acid), are used as electroetching solutions. Various etching and electroetching compositions and processes are discussed, for example, in Etching Compositions and Processes, M. J. Collie, Noyes Data Corporation, 1982, p. 3.
The annealed Cu grain size over the field regions 58 (typically less than 0.5 μm diameter, average) is substantially smaller than the annealed Cu grain size in and over the features 56 (typically up to and sometimes exceeding 5 μm, average), which is a function of the depth of the features. The density of the annealed Cu over the field regions 58, due to voids and other defects, may be in the 97%–100% range, while the corresponding density of the annealed Cu in and over the features 56 is ideally at 100% and, in reality, will be just about 100%. Although this density differential could improve removal properties, it is more important to have present the differential in grain size represented in
Small grain material has a larger concentration of grain boundaries than large grain material. Grain boundaries are “defective” regions as compared to the bulk of the grain, and are where etching or electroetching occurs. Etchants can be formulated to attack grain boundaries, and the rate of chemical attack or chemical etching for small grain material will be higher than that for large grain material. The same can be said for the rate of electroetching, since the same sort of material removal mechanism is present. Thus, in the example discussed above, excess annealed Cu will be removed, by etching or electroetching, from over the field regions 58 before it is removed from over the features 56.
Removal of excess annealed Cu can also be accomplished by CMP. The removal of any material by CMP, however, involves (1) a chemical reaction component, and (2) a mechanical material removal component. In a CMP material process, if the mechanical component of the process is doing most of the material removal, then small grain regions of material can actually have a lower removal rate than that of large grain regions. By contrast, if the chemical component of the CMP process is more dominant, then large grain regions of material will have the lower removal rate. Consequently, in the present application of CMP to remove excess Cu from over the channels 56 and the field regions 58, the CMP process will have to be adjusted so that the chemical component is strong and the small grain regions are removed faster than the large grain regions. Such an adjustment may be performed, for example, by using a relatively reactive chemical composition in the CMP process.
Through the use of etching, electroetching, or a properly selected CMP step, as described, on the grain structure represented in
An alternative way to obtain the structure of
a) shows a patterned insulator layer 50, a barrier layer 52, and a layer 100 of small grain Cu. As in the known process of
After a sufficient amount of Cu has been removed from over the field regions to bring the thickness d1 and d2 into the desired relationship, the small grained Cu is annealed. Annealing produces a differential in grain size, represented in the layered structure shown in
If certain parameters, such as etchant strength, are adjusted in the particular material removal process utilized, then other configurations can be obtained. The cross-sectional view of
Although the invention has been described in connection with the use of depositing Cu, it is similarly applicable to other conductors (metals and conductive metal alloys) which can be electroplated over a semiconductor substrate. The invention is applicable, for example, to depositing Ni, Au, Pt, Ag, Pd, or Rh on such a substrate.
The foregoing disclosure has been set forth merely to illustrate the invention and is not intended to be limiting. Since modifications of the disclosed embodiments incorporating the spirit and substance of the invention may occur to persons skilled in the art, the invention should be construed to include everything within the scope of the appended claims and equivalents thereof.
This is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 09/642,827 filed Aug. 22, 2000 claiming priority to Prov. No. 60/200,002 filed Apr. 27, 2000, incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3328273 | Creutz et al. | Jun 1967 | A |
| 4430173 | Boudot et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
| 4948474 | Miljkovic | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4954142 | Carr et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4975159 | Dahms | Dec 1990 | A |
| 5084071 | Nenadic et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5256565 | Bernhardt et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5354490 | Yu et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5516412 | Andricacos et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5523259 | Merchant et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5681215 | Sherwood et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5755859 | Brusic et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5762544 | Zuniga et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5770095 | Sasaki et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5773364 | Farkas et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5793272 | Burghartz et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5795215 | Guthrie et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5807165 | Uzoh et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5840629 | Carpio | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5858813 | Scherber et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5884990 | Burghartz et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5897375 | Watts et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5911619 | Uzoh et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5922091 | Tsai et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5930669 | Uzoh | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5933753 | Simon et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5954997 | Kaufman et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5985123 | Koon | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6004880 | Liu et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6017144 | Guo et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6027631 | Broadbent | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6063506 | Andricacos et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6066030 | Uzoh | May 2000 | A |
| 6074544 | Reid et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6103085 | Woo et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6136163 | Cheung et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6165555 | Jun et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6176992 | Talieh | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6191027 | Omura | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6228759 | Wang et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6297154 | Gross et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6335569 | Joshi | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6340633 | Lopatin et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6380083 | Gross | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6391774 | Takewaki | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6409904 | Uzoh et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6417571 | Nogami et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6451682 | Fujikawa et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6465354 | Sugai et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6465376 | Uzoh et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6471913 | Weaver et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6478935 | Ueno | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6508920 | Ritzdorf et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| PCT 9827585 | Jun 1998 | WO |
| WO 0026443 | May 2000 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20040052930 A1 | Mar 2004 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60200002 | Apr 2000 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 09642827 | Aug 2000 | US |
| Child | 10663318 | US |