Connector having improved high-voltage surge performance

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6247940
  • Patent Number
    6,247,940
  • Date Filed
    Monday, August 23, 1999
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 19, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
The high-voltage surge performance of a Centronic connector (100) is improved through increasing the free-air distance (120′, 120″) between adjacent pins (102′, 102″) by tapering the portions of pin bodies (301′, 301″) that extend outwardly from the insulating molding (101) of the connector. The bodies may taper either monotonically (FIG. 5) or concavely (FIG. 7). Additional improvement is obtained by extending the tapered pin-body portions into the molding (FIG. 6) and/or by making the molding with ribs (800) that extend outwardly between adjacent pins (FIG. 8) or by thickening the molding.
Description




TECHNICAL FIELD




This invention relates to the configuration of electrical connectors.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Myriads of designs exist for electrical connectors. Most include a plurality of closely-spaced contacts for connecting to individual conductors of electrical signals. Many of these connector designs have become de jure or de facto standards for different applications. A representative of such a connector is the communications industry-standard Centronic connector, which mounts on printed circuit leads of a circuit board and connects the circuit board to off-board multi-lead cables.




Equipment in which such connectors are typically used must often pass rigorous electrical tests before it can be sold. For example, telecommunications equipment in which the Centronic connector is used to connect to external communications lines must in many countries pass a high-voltage surge test wherein the conductors of the connector must withstand a 1 KV surge signal without arcing (shorting) to adjacent conductors. The connector is designed to pass such foreseen tests.




Unfortunately, some jurisdictions have seen fit to impose more stringent tests over time. For example, some jurisdictions now require the above-mentioned telecommunications equipment to pass a 1.5 KV high-voltage surge test. Such tests were not foreseen and therefore not taken into consideration in the design of the connector, with the consequence that the connector does not pass this test. Of course, one can redesign the connector to pass the test, e.g., by increasing the spacing of the connector's conductors, or one can substitute a different kind of connector that is robust enough to pass the test. But the use of such different, non-standard, connectors would destroy the equipment's compliance with the industry standards and would also require the use of non-standard external telecommunications connectors that would subsequently attach to these non-standard connectors.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




This invention is directed to meeting these needs and solving these problems of the prior art. Generally according to the invention, a standard connector is modified in such a way that it meets more stringent high-voltage surge tests, yet still complies with the industry-standard specification for that connector. This is achieved through increasing the free-air distance between adjacent conductors (“pins”) of the connector by modifying their shape but without changing their size, position, or separation.




Specifically, according to the invention, in a connector that has an insulating molding and a plurality of conductive pins extending from the molding, each pin has a base that extends partly out of the molding with a leg of the pin narrower than the base in that portion extending from the base. The base tapers to the leg along an entire length thereof between the leg and the molding. The taper may be monotonic or concave. Preferably, the tapered portion of the base extends into the molding. Also preferably, the molding defines ribs that extend outwardly therefrom between adjacent pins.











These and other features and advantages of the invention will become evident from the following description of an illustrative embodiment of the invention considered together with the drawing.




BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING





FIG. 1

is a side view of a conventional Centronic connector;





FIG. 2

is an end view of the connector of

FIG. 1

;





FIGS. 3 and 4

are top views of two conventional embodiments of adjacent pins of the connector of

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 5

is a top view of a first embodiment of adjacent pins of the connector of

FIG. 1

modified according to the invention;





FIG. 6

is a top view of a second embodiment of adjacent pins of the connector of

FIG. 1

modified according to the invention;





FIG. 7

is a top view of a third embodiment of adjacent pins of the connector of

FIG. 1

modified according to the invention; and





FIG. 8

is a top view of a fourth embodiment of adjacent pins of the connector of

FIG. 1

modified according to the invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION





FIG. 1

shows a side view and

FIG. 2

shows an end view of a standard Centronic connector


100


. Connector


100


includes an insulating (plastic) molding


101


through which extend two rows of a plurality of pins


102


. Connector


100


mounts on an edge of a printed circuit (PC) board


110


. The two rows of pins


102


straddle the edge of PC board


110


and connect to printed leads


111


of PC board


110


with one row of pins


102


on each face of PC board


110


.





FIGS. 3 and 4

show a top view of two adjacent pins


102


in more detail. Each pin


102


is made from a sheet of metal. It includes a wider base


301


which extends through and out of molding


101


, and a narrower leg


300


which extends from base


301


and connects pin


102


to a PC lead


111


by being soldered thereto. Pins


102


are evenly spaced from each other, and the shortest distance between them is distance


120


between their bases


301


. Bases


301


typically are rectangular as shown in

FIG. 3

, or rectangular-chamfered as shown in FIG.


4


.




During a high-voltage surge test, it is free-air distance


120


between adjacent pins


102


that determines what voltage pins


102


can withstand without arcing. (The distance between pins


102


within molding


101


is not critical, because molding


101


is a better insulator than air.) Therefore, to increase the voltage that pins


102


can withstand without arcing, it is desirable to increase free-air distance


120


between adjacent pins


102


. But this must be done without changing the size or the spacing of pins


102


, which are dictated by the standard for connector


100


as well as by pin mechanical-strength considerations.




According to the invention, free-air distance


120


between adjacent pins


102


is increased without changing the size or the spacing of pins


102


. Various ways of accomplishing this are shown in

FIGS. 5-8

.

FIG. 5

shows a pair of adjacent pins


102


′ that have the portion of base


301


′ which extends from molding


101


shaped substantially as a triangle, monotonically tapering toward leg


300


. Therefore, at all points along pin


102


the new free-air distance


120


′ between pins


102


′ is greater than or equal to distance


120


. To ensure that distance


120


′ is always greater that distance


120


along bases


301


′, the tapered portion of base


301


′ extends into molding


101


, as shown in FIG.


6


. This may be accomplished either by making the tapered portion longer, or by making molding


101


thicker.





FIG. 7

shows an alternative embodiment, with a pair of adjacent pins


102


″ that have the portion of base


301


″ which extends from molding


101


concavely curved and tapering toward leg


300


. Therefore, at all points along pin


102


″, the new free-air distance


120


″ between pins


102


″ is greater than or equal to distance


120


. Moreover, at substantially all points along the tapered portion of bases


301


″, free-air distance


120


″ is greater than free-air distance


120


′ of the embodiment of FIG.


5


. Tapered portions of bases


301


″ may likewise extend into molding


101


in the manner of FIG.


6


. Moreover, free-air distance


120


″ may be further increased by using a molding


101


′ that has ribs


800


which extend outwardly between adjacent pins


102


″, as shown in

FIG. 8

or the molding can be made thicker. Such a molding


101


′ may also be used to advantage with the embodiment of

FIGS. 3-6

.




Of course, various changes and modifications to the illustrative embodiments described above will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Such changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and the scope of the invention and without diminishing its attendant advantages. It is therefore intended that such changes and modifications be covered by the following claims except insofar as limited by the prior art.



Claims
  • 1. In an electrical connector for edge connecting a printed circuit board having a plurality of printed circuit paths and the electrical connector having an insulating molding and a plurality of conductive pins extending from a front surface of the molding with the front surface of the electrical connector being opposite a back surface, each pin having a base extending partly out of the front surface of the molding and a leg narrower than the base extending from the base, away from the front surface and making electrical contact with one of the plurality of printed circuit paths on the connected printed circuit board the improvement comprising:the front surface of the molding being flat; and the base tapering to the leg along an entire length thereof between the leg and the front surface of the molding; a free-air distance between adjacent bases of the plurality of pins a high-voltage surge rating between the adjacent bases of the plurality of pins becoming greater as a distance from the front surface along the entire length increases such that the greater free-air distance between adjacent bases provides.
  • 2. The improvement of claim 1 wherein:the base tapers monotonically.
  • 3. The improvement of claim 1 wherein:the base tapers concavely.
  • 4. The improvement of claim 1 wherein:the tapered length of the base extends into the molding.
US Referenced Citations (5)
Number Name Date Kind
4209798 Beretta Jun 1980
4506238 Endoh et al. Mar 1985
4807087 Sawaya Feb 1989
5096428 Lwee et al. Mar 1992
6015316 Matsubara Jan 2000