Consistent interface for feed event, feed event document and feed event type

Description

A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The subject matter described herein relates generally to the generation and use of consistent interfaces (or services) derived from a business object model. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to the generation and use of consistent interfaces or services that are suitable for use across industries, across businesses, and across different departments within a business.

BACKGROUND

Transactions are common among businesses and between business departments within a particular business. During any given transaction, these business entities exchange information. For example, during a sales transaction, numerous business entities may be involved, such as a sales entity that sells merchandise to a customer, a financial institution that handles the financial transaction, and a warehouse that sends the merchandise to the customer. The end-to-end business transaction may require a significant amount of information to be exchanged between the various business entities involved. For example, the customer may send a request for the merchandise as well as some form of payment authorization for the merchandise to the sales entity, and the sales entity may send the financial institution a request for a transfer of funds from the customer's account to the sales entity's account.

Exchanging information between different business entities is not a simple task. This is particularly true because the information used by different business entities is usually tightly tied to the business entity itself. Each business entity may have its own program for handling its part of the transaction. These programs differ from each other because they typically are created for different purposes and because each business entity may use semantics that differ from the other business entities. For example, one program may relate to accounting, another program may relate to manufacturing, and a third program may relate to inventory control. Similarly, one program may identify merchandise using the name of the product while another program may identify the same merchandise using its model number. Further, one business entity may use U.S. dollars to represent its currency while another business entity may use Japanese Yen. A simple difference in formatting, e.g., the use of upper-case lettering rather than lower-case or title-case, makes the exchange of information between businesses a difficult task. Unless the individual businesses agree upon particular semantics, human interaction typically is required to facilitate transactions between these businesses. Because these “heterogeneous” programs are used by different companies or by different business areas within a given company, a need exists for a consistent way to exchange information and perform a business transaction between the different business entities.

Currently, many standards exist that offer a variety of interfaces used to exchange business information. Most of these interfaces, however, apply to only one specific industry and are not consistent between the different standards. Moreover, a number of these interfaces are not consistent within an individual standard.

SUMMARY

In a first aspect, a tangible computer readable medium includes program code for providing a message-based interface for exchanging information about events and user input for which users are notified in a feed system. The medium comprises program code for receiving via a message-based interface derived from a common business object model, where the common business object model includes business objects having relationships that enable derivation of message-based interfaces and message packages, the message-based interface exposing at least one service as defined in a service registry and from a heterogeneous application executing in an environment of computer systems providing message-based services, a first message for querying information about feed events according to specified selection elements that includes a first message package derived from the common business object model and hierarchically organized in memory as a feed event query message entity and a feed event package comprising a feed event entity, where the feed event entity includes a universally unique identifier (UUID) and system administrative data, and where the feed event entity comprises at least one creation identity entity.

The medium further comprises program code for processing the first message according to the hierarchical organization of the first message package, where processing the first message includes unpacking the first message package based on the common business object model.

The medium further comprises program code for sending a second message to the heterogeneous application responsive to the first message, where the second message includes a second message package derived from the common business object model to provide consistent semantics with the first message package.

Implementations can include the following. The feed event entity further includes at least one of the following: a source object name, a source object type name, source change context eXtensible Markup Language (XML) encoded text, a source object identifier (ID), source object add/delete nodes XML encoded text, a source object has children indicator, a source parent object ID, and a children counter value.

In another aspect, a distributed system operates in a landscape of computer systems providing message-based services defined in a service registry. The system comprises a graphical user interface comprising computer readable instructions, embedded on tangible media, for querying information about feed events according to specified selection elements using a request.

The system further comprises a first memory storing a user interface controller for processing the request and involving a message including a message package derived from a common business object model, where the common business object model includes business objects having relationships that enable derivation of message-based service interfaces and message packages, the message package hierarchically organized as a feed event query message entity and a feed event package comprising a feed event entity, where the feed event entity includes a universally unique identifier (UUID) and system administrative data, and where the feed event entity comprises at least one creation identity entity.

The system further comprises a second memory, remote from the graphical user interface, storing a plurality of message-based service interfaces derived from the common business object model to provide consistent semantics with messages derived from the common business object model, where one of the message-based service interfaces processes the message according to the hierarchical organization of the message package, where processing the message includes unpacking the first message package based on the common business object model.

Implementations can include the following. The first memory is remote from the graphical user interface. The first memory is remote from the second memory.

In another aspect, a tangible computer readable medium includes program code for providing a message-based interface for exchanging a language-dependent document describing an event or an input created directly by a user. The medium comprises program code for receiving via a message-based interface derived from a common business object model, where the common business object model includes business objects having relationships that enable derivation of message-based interfaces and message packages, the message-based interface exposing at least one service as defined in a service registry and from a heterogeneous application executing in an environment of computer systems providing message-based services, a first message for querying feed event documents according to specified selection elements, the first message including a first message package derived from the common business object model and hierarchically organized in memory as a feed event document query message entity and a feed event document package comprising a feed event document entity, where the feed event document entity includes a universally unique identifier (UUID), a feed event UUID and a feed event type code, and where the feed event document entity comprises at least one feed event type entity and at least one feed event entity.

Implementations can include the following. The feed event document entity further includes at least one of the following: a textual description of the feed event, additional text and a language code.

In another aspect, a distributed system operates in a landscape of computer systems providing message-based services defined in a service registry. The system comprises a graphical user interface comprising computer readable instructions, embedded on tangible media, for querying feed event documents according to specified selection elements, the first message using a request.

The system further comprises a first memory storing a user interface controller for processing the request and involving a message including a message package derived from a common business object model, where the common business object model includes business objects having relationships that enable derivation of message-based service interfaces and message packages, the message package hierarchically organized as a feed event document query message entity and a feed event document package comprising a feed event document entity, where the feed event document entity includes a universally unique identifier (UUID), a feed event UUID and a feed event type code, and where the feed event document entity comprises at least one feed event type entity and at least one feed event entity.

Implementations can include the following. The first memory is remote from the graphical user interface. The first memory is remote from the second memory.

In another aspect, a tangible computer readable medium includes program code for providing a message-based interface for exchanging information about types of events for which users are notified by a feed. The medium comprises program code for receiving via a message-based interface derived from a common business object model, where the common business object model includes business objects having relationships that enable derivation of message-based interfaces and message packages, the message-based interface exposing at least one service as defined in a service registry and from a heterogeneous application executing in an environment of computer systems providing message-based services, a first message for querying information about feed event types according to specified selection elements that includes a first message package derived from the common business object model and hierarchically organized in memory as a feed event type query message entity and a feed event type package comprising a feed event type entity, where the feed event type entity includes a code and content type text, and where the feed event type entity comprises at least one relevant element entity and at least one documentation entity.

Implementations can include the following. The feed event type entity further includes at least one of the following: a compilation rule name, a subscription automatic indicator, a subscription default indicator, additional context type text, and a usage context type name.

In another aspect, a distributed system operates in a landscape of computer systems providing message-based services defined in a service registry. The system comprises a graphical user interface comprising computer readable instructions, embedded on tangible media, for querying information about feed event types according to specified selection elements using a request.

The system further comprises a first memory storing a user interface controller for processing the request and involving a message including a message package derived from a common business object model, where the common business object model includes business objects having relationships that enable derivation of message-based service interfaces and message packages, the message package hierarchically organized as a feed event type query message entity and a feed event type package comprising a feed event type entity, where the feed event type entity includes a code and content type text, and where the feed event type entity comprises at least one relevant element entity and at least one documentation entity.

Implementations can include the following. The first memory is remote from the graphical user interface. The first memory is remote from the second memory.

The details of one or more implementations of the subject matter described in this specification are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, aspects, and advantages of the subject matter will become apparent from the description, the drawings, and the claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 depicts a flow diagram of the overall steps performed by methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein.

FIG. 2 depicts a business document flow for an invoice request in accordance with methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein.

FIGS. 3A-B illustrate example environments implementing the transmission, receipt, and processing of data between heterogeneous applications in accordance with certain embodiments included in the present disclosure.

FIG. 4 illustrates an example application implementing certain techniques and components in accordance with one embodiment of the system of FIG. 1.

FIG. 5A depicts an example development environment in accordance with one embodiment of FIG. 1.

FIG. 5B depicts a simplified process for mapping a model representation to a runtime representation using the example development environment of FIG. 5A or some other development environment.

FIG. 6 depicts message categories in accordance with methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein.

FIG. 7 depicts an example of a package in accordance with methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein.

FIG. 8 depicts another example of a package in accordance with methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein.

FIG. 9 depicts a third example of a package in accordance with methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein.

FIG. 10 depicts a fourth example of a package in accordance with methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein.

FIG. 11 depicts the representation of a package in the XML schema in accordance with methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein.

FIG. 12 depicts a graphical representation of cardinalities between two entities in accordance with methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein.

FIG. 13 depicts an example of a composition in accordance with methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein.

FIG. 14 depicts an example of a hierarchical relationship in accordance with methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein.

FIG. 15 depicts an example of an aggregating relationship in accordance with methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein.

FIG. 16 depicts an example of an association in accordance with methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein.

FIG. 17 depicts an example of a specialization in accordance with methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein.

FIG. 18 depicts the categories of specializations in accordance with methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein.

FIG. 19 depicts an example of a hierarchy in accordance with methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein.

FIG. 20 depicts a graphical representation of a hierarchy in accordance with methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein.

FIGS. 21A-B depict a flow diagram of the steps performed to create a business object model in accordance with methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein.

FIGS. 22A-F depict a flow diagram of the steps performed to generate an interface from the business object model in accordance with methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein.

FIG. 23 depicts an example illustrating the transmittal of a business document in accordance with methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein.

FIG. 24 depicts an interface proxy in accordance with methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein.

FIG. 25 depicts an example illustrating the transmittal of a message using proxies in accordance with methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein.

FIG. 26A depicts components of a message in accordance with methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein.

FIG. 26B depicts IDs used in a message in accordance with methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein.

FIGS. 27A-E depict a hierarchization process in accordance with methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein.

FIG. 28 illustrates an example method for service enabling in accordance with one embodiment of the present disclosure.

FIG. 29 is a graphical illustration of an example business object and associated components as may be used in the enterprise service infrastructure system of the present disclosure.

FIG. 30 illustrates an example method for managing a process agent framework in accordance with one embodiment of the present disclosure.

FIG. 31 illustrates an example method for status and action management in accordance with one embodiment of the present disclosure.

FIG. 32 depicts an example Feed Event Object Model.

FIG. 33 depicts an example Feed Event Document Object Model.

FIG. 34 depicts an example Feed Event Type Object Model.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A. Overview

Methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein facilitate e-commerce by providing consistent interfaces that are suitable for use across industries, across businesses, and across different departments within a business during a business transaction. To generate consistent interfaces, methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein utilize a business object model, which reflects the data that will be used during a given business transaction. An example of a business transaction is the exchange of purchase orders and order confirmations between a buyer and a seller. The business object model is generated in a hierarchical manner to ensure that the same type of data is represented the same way throughout the business object model. This ensures the consistency of the information in the business object model. Consistency is also reflected in the semantic meaning of the various structural elements. That is, each structural element has a consistent business meaning. For example, the location entity, regardless of in which package it is located, refers to a location.

From this business object model, various interfaces are derived to accomplish the functionality of the business transaction. Interfaces provide an entry point for components to access the functionality of an application. For example, the interface for a Purchase Order Request provides an entry point for components to access the functionality of a Purchase Order, in particular, to transmit and/or receive a Purchase Order Request. One skilled in the art will recognize that each of these interfaces may be provided, sold, distributed, utilized, or marketed as a separate product or as a major component of a separate product. Alternatively, a group of related interfaces may be provided, sold, distributed, utilized, or marketed as a product or as a major component of a separate product. Because the interfaces are generated from the business object model, the information in the interfaces is consistent, and the interfaces are consistent among the business entities. Such consistency facilitates heterogeneous business entities in cooperating to accomplish the business transaction.

Generally, the business object is a representation of a type of a uniquely identifiable business entity (an object instance) described by a structural model. In the architecture, processes may typically operate on business objects. Business objects represent a specific view on some well-defined business content. In other words, business objects represent content, which a typical business user would expect and understand with little explanation. Business objects are further categorized as business process objects and master data objects. A master data object is an object that encapsulates master data (i.e., data that is valid for a period of time). A business process object, which is the kind of business object generally found in a process component, is an object that encapsulates transactional data (i.e., data that is valid for a point in time). The term business object will be used generically to refer to a business process object and a master data object, unless the context requires otherwise. Properly implemented, business objects are implemented free of redundancies.

The architectural elements also include the process component. The process component is a software package that realizes a business process and generally exposes its functionality as services. The functionality contains business transactions. In general, the process component contains one or more semantically related business objects. Often, a particular business object belongs to no more than one process component. Interactions between process component pairs involving their respective business objects, process agents, operations, interfaces, and messages are described as process component interactions, which generally determine the interactions of a pair of process components across a deployment unit boundary. Interactions between process components within a deployment unit are typically not constrained by the architectural design and can be implemented in any convenient fashion. Process components may be modular and context-independent. In other words, process components may not be specific to any particular application and as such, may be reusable. In some implementations, the process component is the smallest (most granular) element of reuse in the architecture. An external process component is generally used to represent the external system in describing interactions with the external system; however, this should be understood to require no more of the external system than that able to produce and receive messages as required by the process component that interacts with the external system. For example, process components may include multiple operations that may provide interaction with the external system. Each operation generally belongs to one type of process component in the architecture. Operations can be synchronous or asynchronous, corresponding to synchronous or asynchronous process agents, which will be described below. The operation is often the smallest, separately-callable function, described by a set of data types used as input, output, and fault parameters serving as a signature.

The architectural elements may also include the service interface, referred to simply as the interface. The interface is a named group of operations. The interface often belongs to one process component and process component might contain multiple interfaces. In one implementation, the service interface contains only inbound or outbound operations, but not a mixture of both. One interface can contain both synchronous and asynchronous operations. Normally, operations of the same type (either inbound or outbound) which belong to the same message choreography will belong to the same interface. Thus, generally, all outbound operations to the same other process component are in one interface.

The architectural elements also include the message. Operations transmit and receive messages. Any convenient messaging infrastructure can be used. A message is information conveyed from one process component instance to another, with the expectation that activity will ensue. Operation can use multiple message types for inbound, outbound, or error messages. When two process components are in different deployment units, invocation of an operation of one process component by the other process component is accomplished by the operation on the other process component sending a message to the first process component.

The architectural elements may also include the process agent. Process agents do business processing that involves the sending or receiving of messages. Each operation normally has at least one associated process agent. Each process agent can be associated with one or more operations. Process agents can be either inbound or outbound and either synchronous or asynchronous. Asynchronous outbound process agents are called after a business object changes such as after a “create”, “update”, or “delete” of a business object instance. Synchronous outbound process agents are generally triggered directly by business object. An outbound process agent will generally perform some processing of the data of the business object instance whose change triggered the event. The outbound agent triggers subsequent business process steps by sending messages using well-defined outbound services to another process component, which generally will be in another deployment unit, or to an external system. The outbound process agent is linked to the one business object that triggers the agent, but it is sent not to another business object but rather to another process component. Thus, the outbound process agent can be implemented without knowledge of the exact business object design of the recipient process component. Alternatively, the process agent may be inbound. For example, inbound process agents may be used for the inbound part of a message-based communication. Inbound process agents are called after a message has been received. The inbound process agent starts the execution of the business process step requested in a message by creating or updating one or multiple business object instances. Inbound process agent is not generally the agent of business object but of its process component. Inbound process agent can act on multiple business objects in a process component. Regardless of whether the process agent is inbound or outbound, an agent may be synchronous if used when a process component requires a more or less immediate response from another process component, and is waiting for that response to continue its work.

The architectural elements also include the deployment unit. Each deployment unit may include one or more process components that are generally deployed together on a single computer system platform. Conversely, separate deployment units can be deployed on separate physical computing systems. The process components of one deployment unit can interact with those of another deployment unit using messages passed through one or more data communication networks or other suitable communication channels. Thus, a deployment unit deployed on a platform belonging to one business can interact with a deployment unit software entity deployed on a separate platform belonging to a different and unrelated business, allowing for business-to-business communication. More than one instance of a given deployment unit can execute at the same time, on the same computing system or on separate physical computing systems. This arrangement allows the functionality offered by the deployment unit to be scaled to meet demand by creating as many instances as needed.

Since interaction between deployment units is through process component operations, one deployment unit can be replaced by other another deployment unit as long as the new deployment unit supports the operations depended upon by other deployment units as appropriate. Thus, while deployment units can depend on the external interfaces of process components in other deployment units, deployment units are not dependent on process component interaction within other deployment units. Similarly, process components that interact with other process components or external systems only through messages, e.g., as sent and received by operations, can also be replaced as long as the replacement generally supports the operations of the original.

Services (or interfaces) may be provided in a flexible architecture to support varying criteria between services and systems. The flexible architecture may generally be provided by a service delivery business object. The system may be able to schedule a service asynchronously as necessary, or on a regular basis. Services may be planned according to a schedule manually or automatically. For example, a follow-up service may be scheduled automatically upon completing an initial service. In addition, flexible execution periods may be possible (e.g. hourly, daily, every three months, etc.). Each customer may plan the services on demand or reschedule service execution upon request.

FIG. 1 depicts a flow diagram 100 showing an example technique, perhaps implemented by systems similar to those disclosed herein. Initially, to generate the business object model, design engineers study the details of a business process, and model the business process using a “business scenario” (step 102). The business scenario identifies the steps performed by the different business entities during a business process. Thus, the business scenario is a complete representation of a clearly defined business process.

After creating the business scenario, the developers add details to each step of the business scenario (step 104). In particular, for each step of the business scenario, the developers identify the complete process steps performed by each business entity. A discrete portion of the business scenario reflects a “business transaction,” and each business entity is referred to as a “component” of the business transaction. The developers also identify the messages that are transmitted between the components. A “process interaction model” represents the complete process steps between two components.

After creating the process interaction model, the developers create a “message choreography” (step 106), which depicts the messages transmitted between the two components in the process interaction model. The developers then represent the transmission of the messages between the components during a business process in a “business document flow” (step 108). Thus, the business document flow illustrates the flow of information between the business entities during a business process.

FIG. 2 depicts an example business document flow 200 for the process of purchasing a product or service. The business entities involved with the illustrative purchase process include Accounting 202, Payment 204, Invoicing 206, Supply Chain Execution (“SCE”) 208, Supply Chain Planning (“SCP”) 210, Fulfillment Coordination (“FC”) 212, Supply Relationship Management (“SRM”) 214, Supplier 216, and Bank 218. The business document flow 200 is divided into four different transactions: Preparation of Ordering (“Contract”) 220, Ordering 222, Goods Receiving (“Delivery”) 224, and Billing/Payment 226. In the business document flow, arrows 228 represent the transmittal of documents. Each document reflects a message transmitted between entities. One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the messages transferred may be considered to be a communications protocol. The process flow follows the focus of control, which is depicted as a solid vertical line (e.g., 229) when the step is required, and a dotted vertical line (e.g., 230) when the step is optional.

During the Contract transaction 220, the SRM 214 sends a Source of Supply Notification 232 to the SCP 210. This step is optional, as illustrated by the optional control line 230 coupling this step to the remainder of the business document flow 200. During the Ordering transaction 222, the SCP 210 sends a Purchase Requirement Request 234 to the FC 212, which forwards a Purchase Requirement Request 236 to the SRM 214. The SRM 214 then sends a Purchase Requirement Confirmation 238 to the FC 212, and the FC 212 sends a Purchase Requirement Confirmation 240 to the SCP 210. The SRM 214 also sends a Purchase Order Request 242 to the Supplier 216, and sends Purchase Order Information 244 to the FC 212. The FC 212 then sends a Purchase Order Planning Notification 246 to the SCP 210. The Supplier 216, after receiving the Purchase Order Request 242, sends a Purchase Order Confirmation 248 to the SRM 214, which sends a Purchase Order Information confirmation message 254 to the FC 212, which sends a message 256 confirming the Purchase Order Planning Notification to the SCP 210. The SRM 214 then sends an Invoice Due Notification 258 to Invoicing 206.

During the Delivery transaction 224, the FC 212 sends a Delivery Execution Request 260 to the SCE 208. The Supplier 216 could optionally (illustrated at control line 250) send a Dispatched Delivery Notification 252 to the SCE 208. The SCE 208 then sends a message 262 to the FC 212 notifying the FC 212 that the request for the Delivery Information was created. The FC 212 then sends a message 264 notifying the SRM 214 that the request for the Delivery Information was created. The FC 212 also sends a message 266 notifying the SCP 210 that the request for the Delivery Information was created. The SCE 208 sends a message 268 to the FC 212 when the goods have been set aside for delivery. The FC 212 sends a message 270 to the SRM 214 when the goods have been set aside for delivery. The FC 212 also sends a message 272 to the SCP 210 when the goods have been set aside for delivery.

The SCE 208 sends a message 274 to the FC 212 when the goods have been delivered. The FC 212 then sends a message 276 to the SRM 214 indicating that the goods have been delivered, and sends a message 278 to the SCP 210 indicating that the goods have been delivered. The SCE 208 then sends an Inventory Change Accounting Notification 280 to Accounting 202, and an Inventory Change Notification 282 to the SCP 210. The FC 212 sends an Invoice Due Notification 284 to Invoicing 206, and SCE 208 sends a Received Delivery Notification 286 to the Supplier 216.

During the Billing/Payment transaction 226, the Supplier 216 sends an Invoice Request 287 to Invoicing 206. Invoicing 206 then sends a Payment Due Notification 288 to Payment 204, a Tax Due Notification 289 to Payment 204, an Invoice Confirmation 290 to the Supplier 216, and an Invoice Accounting Notification 291 to Accounting 202. Payment 204 sends a Payment Request 292 to the Bank 218, and a Payment Requested Accounting Notification 293 to Accounting 202. Bank 218 sends a Bank Statement Information 296 to Payment 204. Payment 204 then sends a Payment Done Information 294 to Invoicing 206 and a Payment Done Accounting Notification 295 to Accounting 202.

Within a business document flow, business documents having the same or similar structures are marked. For example, in the business document flow 200 depicted in FIG. 2, Purchase Requirement Requests 234, 236 and Purchase Requirement Confirmations 238, 240 have the same structures. Thus, each of these business documents is marked with an “O6.” Similarly, Purchase Order Request 242 and Purchase Order Confirmation 248 have the same structures. Thus, both documents are marked with an “O1.” Each business document or message is based on a message type.

From the business document flow, the developers identify the business documents having identical or similar structures, and use these business documents to create the business object model (step 110). The business object model includes the objects contained within the business documents. These objects are reflected as packages containing related information, and are arranged in a hierarchical structure within the business object model, as discussed below.

Methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein then generate interfaces from the business object model (step 112). The heterogeneous programs use instantiations of these interfaces (called “business document objects” below) to create messages (step 114), which are sent to complete the business transaction (step 116). Business entities use these messages to exchange information with other business entities during an end-to-end business transaction. Since the business object model is shared by heterogeneous programs, the interfaces are consistent among these programs. The heterogeneous programs use these consistent interfaces to communicate in a consistent manner, thus facilitating the business transactions.

Standardized Business-to-Business (“B2B”) messages are compliant with at least one of the e-business standards (i.e., they include the business-relevant fields of the standard). The e-business standards include, for example, RosettaNet for the high-tech industry, Chemical Industry Data Exchange (“CIDX”), Petroleum Industry Data Exchange (“PIDX”) for the oil industry, UCCnet for trade, PapiNet for the paper industry, Odette for the automotive industry, HR-XML for human resources, and XML Common Business Library (“xCBL”). Thus, B2B messages enable simple integration of components in heterogeneous system landscapes. Application-to-Application (“A2A”) messages often exceed the standards and thus may provide the benefit of the full functionality of application components. Although various steps of FIG. 1 were described as being performed manually, one skilled in the art will appreciate that such steps could be computer-assisted or performed entirely by a computer, including being performed by either hardware, software, or any other combination thereof.

B. Implementation Details

As discussed above, methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein create consistent interfaces by generating the interfaces from a business object model. Details regarding the creation of the business object model, the generation of an interface from the business object model, and the use of an interface generated from the business object model are provided below.

Turning to the illustrated embodiment in FIG. 3A, environment 300 includes or is communicably coupled (such as via a one-, bi- or multi-directional link or network) with server 302, one or more clients 304, one or more or vendors 306, one or more customers 308, at least some of which communicate across network 312. But, of course, this illustration is for example purposes only, and any distributed system or environment implementing one or more of the techniques described herein may be within the scope of this disclosure. Server 302 comprises an electronic computing device operable to receive, transmit, process and store data associated with environment 300. Generally, FIG. 3A provides merely one example of computers that may be used with the disclosure. Each computer is generally intended to encompass any suitable processing device. For example, although FIG. 3A illustrates one server 302 that may be used with the disclosure, environment 300 can be implemented using computers other than servers, as well as a server pool. Indeed, server 302 may be any computer or processing device such as, for example, a blade server, general-purpose personal computer (PC), Macintosh, workstation, Unix-based computer, or any other suitable device. In other words, the present disclosure contemplates computers other than general purpose computers as well as computers without conventional operating systems. Server 302 may be adapted to execute any operating system including Linux, UNIX, Windows Server, or any other suitable operating system. According to one embodiment, server 302 may also include or be communicably coupled with a web server and/or a mail server.

As illustrated (but not required), the server 302 is communicably coupled with a relatively remote repository 335 over a portion of the network 312. The repository 335 is any electronic storage facility, data processing center, or archive that may supplement or replace local memory (such as 327). The repository 335 may be a central database communicably coupled with the one or more servers 302 and the clients 304 via a virtual private network (VPN), SSH (Secure Shell) tunnel, or other secure network connection. The repository 335 may be physically or logically located at any appropriate location including in one of the example enterprises or off-shore, so long as it remains operable to store information associated with the environment 300 and communicate such data to the server 302 or at least a subset of plurality of the clients 304.

Illustrated server 302 includes local memory 327. Memory 327 may include any memory or database module and may take the form of volatile or non-volatile memory including, without limitation, magnetic media, optical media, random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), removable media, or any other suitable local or remote memory component. Illustrated memory 327 includes an exchange infrastructure (“XI”) 314, which is an infrastructure that supports the technical interaction of business processes across heterogeneous system environments. XI 314 centralizes the communication between components within a business entity and between different business entities. When appropriate, XI 314 carries out the mapping between the messages. XI 314 integrates different versions of systems implemented on different platforms (e.g., Java and ABAP). XI 314 is based on an open architecture, and makes use of open standards, such as eXtensible Markup Language (XML)™ and Java environments. XI 314 offers services that are useful in a heterogeneous and complex system landscape. In particular, XI 314 offers a runtime infrastructure for message exchange, configuration options for managing business processes and message flow, and options for transforming message contents between sender and receiver systems.

XI 314 stores data types 316, a business object model 318, and interfaces 320. The details regarding the business object model are described below. Data types 316 are the building blocks for the business object model 318. The business object model 318 is used to derive consistent interfaces 320. XI 314 allows for the exchange of information from a first company having one computer system to a second company having a second computer system over network 312 by using the standardized interfaces 320.

While not illustrated, memory 327 may also include business objects and any other appropriate data such as services, interfaces, VPN applications or services, firewall policies, a security or access log, print or other reporting files, HTML files or templates, data classes or object interfaces, child software applications or sub-systems, and others. This stored data may be stored in one or more logical or physical repositories. In some embodiments, the stored data (or pointers thereto) may be stored in one or more tables in a relational database described in terms of SQL statements or scripts. In the same or other embodiments, the stored data may also be formatted, stored, or defined as various data structures in text files, XML documents, Virtual Storage Access Method (VSAM) files, flat files, Btrieve files, comma-separated-value (CSV) files, internal variables, or one or more libraries. For example, a particular data service record may merely be a pointer to a particular piece of third party software stored remotely. In another example, a particular data service may be an internally stored software object usable by authenticated customers or internal development. In short, the stored data may comprise one table or file or a plurality of tables or files stored on one computer or across a plurality of computers in any appropriate format. Indeed, some or all of the stored data may be local or remote without departing from the scope of this disclosure and store any type of appropriate data.

Server 302 also includes processor 325. Processor 325 executes instructions and manipulates data to perform the operations of server 302 such as, for example, a central processing unit (CPU), a blade, an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), or a field-programmable gate array (FPGA). Although FIG. 3A illustrates a single processor 325 in server 302, multiple processors 325 may be used according to particular needs and reference to processor 325 is meant to include multiple processors 325 where applicable. In the illustrated embodiment, processor 325 executes at least business application 330.

At a high level, business application 330 is any application, program, module, process, or other software that utilizes or facilitates the exchange of information via messages (or services) or the use of business objects. For example, application 330 may implement, utilize or otherwise leverage an enterprise service-oriented architecture (enterprise SOA), which may be considered a blueprint for an adaptable, flexible, and open IT architecture for developing services-based, enterprise-scale business solutions. This example enterprise service may be a series of web services combined with business logic that can be accessed and used repeatedly to support a particular business process. Aggregating web services into business-level enterprise services helps provide a more meaningful foundation for the task of automating enterprise-scale business scenarios Put simply, enterprise services help provide a holistic combination of actions that are semantically linked to complete the specific task, no matter how many cross-applications are involved. In certain cases, environment 300 may implement a composite application 330, as described below in FIG. 4. Regardless of the particular implementation, “software” may include software, firmware, wired or programmed hardware, or any combination thereof as appropriate. Indeed, application 330 may be written or described in any appropriate computer language including C, C++, Java, Visual Basic, assembler, Perl, any suitable version of 4GL, as well as others. For example, returning to the above mentioned composite application, the composite application portions may be implemented as Enterprise Java Beans (EJBs) or the design-time components may have the ability to generate run-time implementations into different platforms, such as J2EE (Java 2 Platform, Enterprise Edition), ABAP (Advanced Business Application Programming) objects, or Microsoft's .NET. It will be understood that while application 330 is illustrated in FIG. 4 as including various sub-modules, application 330 may include numerous other sub-modules or may instead be a single multi-tasked module that implements the various features and functionality through various objects, methods, or other processes. Further, while illustrated as internal to server 302, one or more processes associated with application 330 may be stored, referenced, or executed remotely. For example, a portion of application 330 may be a web service that is remotely called, while another portion of application 330 may be an interface object bundled for processing at remote client 304. Moreover, application 330 may be a child or sub-module of another software module or enterprise application (not illustrated) without departing from the scope of this disclosure. Indeed, application 330 may be a hosted solution that allows multiple related or third parties in different portions of the process to perform the respective processing.

More specifically, as illustrated in FIG. 4, application 330 may be a composite application, or an application built on other applications, that includes an object access layer (OAL) and a service layer. In this example, application 330 may execute or provide a number of application services, such as customer relationship management (CRM) systems, human resources management (HRM) systems, financial management (FM) systems, project management (PM) systems, knowledge management (KM) systems, and electronic file and mail systems. Such an object access layer is operable to exchange data with a plurality of enterprise base systems and to present the data to a composite application through a uniform interface. The example service layer is operable to provide services to the composite application. These layers may help the composite application to orchestrate a business process in synchronization with other existing processes (e.g., native processes of enterprise base systems) and leverage existing investments in the IT platform. Further, composite application 330 may run on a heterogeneous IT platform. In doing so, composite application may be cross-functional in that it may drive business processes across different applications, technologies, and organizations. Accordingly, composite application 330 may drive end-to-end business processes across heterogeneous systems or sub-systems. Application 330 may also include or be coupled with a persistence layer and one or more application system connectors. Such application system connectors enable data exchange and integration with enterprise sub-systems and may include an Enterprise Connector (EC) interface, an Internet Communication Manager/Internet Communication Framework (ICM/ICF) interface, an Encapsulated PostScript (EPS) interface, and/or other interfaces that provide Remote Function Call (RFC) capability. It will be understood that while this example describes a composite application 330, it may instead be a standalone or (relatively) simple software program. Regardless, application 330 may also perform processing automatically, which may indicate that the appropriate processing is substantially performed by at least one component of environment 300. It should be understood that automatically further contemplates any suitable administrator or other user interaction with application 330 or other components of environment 300 without departing from the scope of this disclosure.

Returning to FIG. 3A, illustrated server 302 may also include interface 317 for communicating with other computer systems, such as clients 304, over network 312 in a client-server or other distributed environment. In certain embodiments, server 302 receives data from internal or external senders through interface 317 for storage in memory 327, for storage in DB 335, and/or processing by processor 325. Generally, interface 317 comprises logic encoded in software and/or hardware in a suitable combination and operable to communicate with network 312. More specifically, interface 317 may comprise software supporting one or more communications protocols associated with communications network 312 or hardware operable to communicate physical signals.

Network 312 facilitates wireless or wireline communication between computer server 302 and any other local or remote computer, such as clients 304. Network 312 may be all or a portion of an enterprise or secured network. In another example, network 312 may be a VPN merely between server 302 and client 304 across wireline or wireless link. Such an example wireless link may be via 802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.20, WiMax, and many others. While illustrated as a single or continuous network, network 312 may be logically divided into various sub-nets or virtual networks without departing from the scope of this disclosure, so long as at least portion of network 312 may facilitate communications between server 302 and at least one client 304. For example, server 302 may be communicably coupled to one or more “local” repositories through one sub-net while communicably coupled to a particular client 304 or “remote” repositories through another. In other words, network 312 encompasses any internal or external network, networks, sub-network, or combination thereof operable to facilitate communications between various computing components in environment 300. Network 312 may communicate, for example, Internet Protocol (IP) packets, Frame Relay frames, Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) cells, voice, video, data, and other suitable information between network addresses. Network 312 may include one or more local area networks (LANs), radio access networks (RANs), metropolitan area networks (MANs), wide area networks (WANs), all or a portion of the global computer network known as the Internet, and/or any other communication system or systems at one or more locations. In certain embodiments, network 312 may be a secure network associated with the enterprise and certain local or remote vendors 306 and customers 308. As used in this disclosure, customer 308 is any person, department, organization, small business, enterprise, or any other entity that may use or request others to use environment 300. As described above, vendors 306 also may be local or remote to customer 308. Indeed, a particular vendor 306 may provide some content to business application 330, while receiving or purchasing other content (at the same or different times) as customer 308. As illustrated, customer 308 and vendor 06 each typically perform some processing (such as uploading or purchasing content) using a computer, such as client 304.

Client 304 is any computing device operable to connect or communicate with server 302 or network 312 using any communication link. For example, client 304 is intended to encompass a personal computer, touch screen terminal, workstation, network computer, kiosk, wireless data port, smart phone, personal data assistant (PDA), one or more processors within these or other devices, or any other suitable processing device used by or for the benefit of business 308, vendor 306, or some other user or entity. At a high level, each client 304 includes or executes at least GUI 336 and comprises an electronic computing device operable to receive, transmit, process and store any appropriate data associated with environment 300. It will be understood that there may be any number of clients 304 communicably coupled to server 302. Further, “client 304,” “business,” “business analyst,” “end user,” and “user” may be used interchangeably as appropriate without departing from the scope of this disclosure. Moreover, for ease of illustration, each client 304 is described in terms of being used by one user. But this disclosure contemplates that many users may use one computer or that one user may use multiple computers. For example, client 304 may be a PDA operable to wirelessly connect with external or unsecured network. In another example, client 304 may comprise a laptop that includes an input device, such as a keypad, touch screen, mouse, or other device that can accept information, and an output device that conveys information associated with the operation of server 302 or clients 304, including digital data, visual information, or GUI 336. Both the input device and output device may include fixed or removable storage media such as a magnetic computer disk, CD-ROM, or other suitable media to both receive input from and provide output to users of clients 304 through the display, namely the client portion of GUI or application interface 336.

GUI 336 comprises a graphical user interface operable to allow the user of client 304 to interface with at least a portion of environment 300 for any suitable purpose, such as viewing application or other transaction data. Generally, GUI 336 provides the particular user with an efficient and user-friendly presentation of data provided by or communicated within environment 300. For example, GUI 336 may present the user with the components and information that is relevant to their task, increase reuse of such components, and facilitate a sizable developer community around those components. GUI 336 may comprise a plurality of customizable frames or views having interactive fields, pull-down lists, and buttons operated by the user. For example, GUI 336 is operable to display data involving business objects and interfaces in a user-friendly form based on the user context and the displayed data. In another example, GUI 336 is operable to display different levels and types of information involving business objects and interfaces based on the identified or supplied user role. GUI 336 may also present a plurality of portals or dashboards. For example, GUI 336 may display a portal that allows users to view, create, and manage historical and real-time reports including role-based reporting and such. Of course, such reports may be in any appropriate output format including PDF, HTML, and printable text. Real-time dashboards often provide table and graph information on the current state of the data, which may be supplemented by business objects and interfaces. It should be understood that the term graphical user interface may be used in the singular or in the plural to describe one or more graphical user interfaces and each of the displays of a particular graphical user interface. Indeed, reference to GUI 336 may indicate a reference to the front-end or a component of business application 330, as well as the particular interface accessible via client 304, as appropriate, without departing from the scope of this disclosure. Therefore, GUI 336 contemplates any graphical user interface, such as a generic web browser or touchscreen, that processes information in environment 300 and efficiently presents the results to the user. Server 302 can accept data from client 304 via the web browser (e.g., Microsoft Internet Explorer or Netscape Navigator) and return the appropriate HTML or XML responses to the browser using network 312.

More generally in environment 300 as depicted in FIG. 3B, a Foundation Layer 375 can be deployed on multiple separate and distinct hardware platforms, e.g., System A 350 and System B 360, to support application software deployed as two or more deployment units distributed on the platforms, including deployment unit 352 deployed on System A and deployment unit 362 deployed on System B. In this example, the foundation layer can be used to support application software deployed in an application layer. In particular, the foundation layer can be used in connection with application software implemented in accordance with a software architecture that provides a suite of enterprise service operations having various application functionality. In some implementations, the application software is implemented to be deployed on an application platform that includes a foundation layer that contains all fundamental entities that can used from multiple deployment units. These entities can be process components, business objects, and reuse service components. A reuse service component is a piece of software that is reused in different transactions. A reuse service component is used by its defined interfaces, which can be, e.g., local APIs or service interfaces. As explained above, process components in separate deployment units interact through service operations, as illustrated by messages passing between service operations 356 and 366, which are implemented in process components 354 and 364, respectively, which are included in deployment units 352 and 362, respectively. As also explained above, some form of direct communication is generally the form of interaction used between a business object, e.g., business object 358 and 368, of an application deployment unit and a business object, such as master data object 370, of the Foundation Layer 375.

Various components of the present disclosure may be modeled using a model-driven environment. For example, the model-driven framework or environment may allow the developer to use simple drag-and-drop techniques to develop pattern-based or freestyle user interfaces and define the flow of data between them. The result could be an efficient, customized, visually rich online experience. In some cases, this model-driven development may accelerate the application development process and foster business-user self-service. It further enables business analysts or IT developers to compose visually rich applications that use analytic services, enterprise services, remote function calls (RFCs), APIs, and stored procedures. In addition, it may allow them to reuse existing applications and create content using a modeling process and a visual user interface instead of manual coding.

FIG. 5A depicts an example modeling environment 516, namely a modeling environment, in accordance with one embodiment of the present disclosure. Thus, as illustrated in FIG. 5A, such a modeling environment 516 may implement techniques for decoupling models created during design-time from the runtime environment. In other words, model representations for GUIs created in a design time environment are decoupled from the runtime environment in which the GUIs are executed. Often in these environments, a declarative and executable representation for GUIs for applications is provided that is independent of any particular runtime platform, GUI framework, device, or programming language.

According to some embodiments, a modeler (or other analyst) may use the model-driven modeling environment 516 to create pattern-based or freestyle user interfaces using simple drag-and-drop services. Because this development may be model-driven, the modeler can typically compose an application using models of business objects without having to write much, if any, code. In some cases, this example modeling environment 516 may provide a personalized, secure interface that helps unify enterprise applications, information, and processes into a coherent, role-based portal experience. Further, the modeling environment 516 may allow the developer to access and share information and applications in a collaborative environment. In this way, virtual collaboration rooms allow developers to work together efficiently, regardless of where they are located, and may enable powerful and immediate communication that crosses organizational boundaries while enforcing security requirements. Indeed, the modeling environment 516 may provide a shared set of services for finding, organizing, and accessing unstructured content stored in third-party repositories and content management systems across various networks 312. Classification tools may automate the organization of information, while subject-matter experts and content managers can publish information to distinct user audiences. Regardless of the particular implementation or architecture, this modeling environment 516 may allow the developer to easily model hosted business objects 140 using this model-driven approach.

In certain embodiments, the modeling environment 516 may implement or utilize a generic, declarative, and executable GUI language (generally described as XGL). This example XGL is generally independent of any particular GUI framework or runtime platform. Further, XGL is normally not dependent on characteristics of a target device on which the graphic user interface is to be displayed and may also be independent of any programming language. XGL is used to generate a generic representation (occasionally referred to as the XGL representation or XGL-compliant representation) for a design-time model representation. The XGL representation is thus typically a device-independent representation of a GUI. The XGL representation is declarative in that the representation does not depend on any particular GUI framework, runtime platform, device, or programming language. The XGL representation can be executable and therefore can unambiguously encapsulate execution semantics for the GUI described by a model representation. In short, models of different types can be transformed to XGL representations.

The XGL representation may be used for generating representations of various different GUIs and supports various GUI features including full windowing and componentization support, rich data visualizations and animations, rich modes of data entry and user interactions, and flexible connectivity to any complex application data services. While a specific embodiment of XGL is discussed, various other types of XGLs may also be used in alternative embodiments. In other words, it will be understood that XGL is used for example description only and may be read to include any abstract or modeling language that can be generic, declarative, and executable.

Turning to the illustrated embodiment in FIG. 5A, modeling tool 340 may be used by a GUI designer or business analyst during the application design phase to create a model representation 502 for a GUI application. It will be understood that modeling environment 516 may include or be compatible with various different modeling tools 340 used to generate model representation 502. This model representation 502 may be a machine-readable representation of an application or a domain specific model. Model representation 502 generally encapsulates various design parameters related to the GUI such as GUI components, dependencies between the GUI components, inputs and outputs, and the like. Put another way, model representation 502 provides a form in which the one or more models can be persisted and transported, and possibly handled by various tools such as code generators, runtime interpreters, analysis and validation tools, merge tools, and the like. In one embodiment, model representation 502 maybe a collection of XML documents with a well-formed syntax.

Illustrated modeling environment 516 also includes an abstract representation generator (or XGL generator) 504 operable to generate an abstract representation (for example, XGL representation or XGL-compliant representation) 506 based upon model representation 502. Abstract representation generator 504 takes model representation 502 as input and outputs abstract representation 506 for the model representation. Model representation 502 may include multiple instances of various forms or types depending on the tool/language used for the modeling. In certain cases, these various different model representations may each be mapped to one or more abstract representations 506. Different types of model representations may be transformed or mapped to XGL representations. For each type of model representation, mapping rules may be provided for mapping the model representation to the XGL representation 506. Different mapping rules may be provided for mapping a model representation to an XGL representation.

This XGL representation 506 that is created from a model representation may then be used for processing in the runtime environment. For example, the XGL representation 506 may be used to generate a machine-executable runtime GUI (or some other runtime representation) that may be executed by a target device. As part of the runtime processing, the XGL representation 506 may be transformed into one or more runtime representations, which may indicate source code in a particular programming language, machine-executable code for a specific runtime environment, executable GUI, and so forth, which may be generated for specific runtime environments and devices. Since the XGL representation 506, rather than the design-time model representation, is used by the runtime environment, the design-time model representation is decoupled from the runtime environment. The XGL representation 506 can thus serve as the common ground or interface between design-time user interface modeling tools and a plurality of user interface runtime frameworks. It provides a self-contained, closed, and deterministic definition of all aspects of a graphical user interface in a device-independent and programming-language independent manner. Accordingly, abstract representation 506 generated for a model representation 502 is generally declarative and executable in that it provides a representation of the GUI of model representation 502 that is not dependent on any device or runtime platform, is not dependent on any programming language, and unambiguously encapsulates execution semantics for the GUI. The execution semantics may include, for example, identification of various components of the GUI, interpretation of connections between the various GUI components, information identifying the order of sequencing of events, rules governing dynamic behavior of the GUI, rules governing handling of values by the GUI, and the like. The abstract representation 506 is also not GUI runtime-platform specific. The abstract representation 506 provides a self-contained, closed, and deterministic definition of all aspects of a graphical user interface that is device independent and language independent.

Abstract representation 506 is such that the appearance and execution semantics of a GUI generated from the XGL representation work consistently on different target devices irrespective of the GUI capabilities of the target device and the target device platform. For example, the same XGL representation may be mapped to appropriate GUIs on devices of differing levels of GUI complexity (i.e., the same abstract representation may be used to generate a GUI for devices that support simple GUIs and for devices that can support complex GUIs), the GUI generated by the devices are consistent with each other in their appearance and behavior.

Abstract representation generator 504 may be configured to generate abstract representation 506 for models of different types, which may be created using different modeling tools 340. It will be understood that modeling environment 516 may include some, none, or other sub-modules or components as those shown in this example illustration. In other words, modeling environment 516 encompasses the design-time environment (with or without the abstract generator or the various representations), a modeling toolkit (such as 340) linked with a developer's space, or any other appropriate software operable to decouple models created during design-time from the runtime environment. Abstract representation 506 provides an interface between the design time environment and the runtime environment. As shown, this abstract representation 506 may then be used by runtime processing.

As part of runtime processing, modeling environment 516 may include various runtime tools 508 and may generate different types of runtime representations based upon the abstract representation 506. Examples of runtime representations include device or language-dependent (or specific) source code, runtime platform-specific machine-readable code, GUIs for a particular target device, and the like. The runtime tools 508 may include compilers, interpreters, source code generators, and other such tools that are configured to generate runtime platform-specific or target device-specific runtime representations of abstract representation 506. The runtime tool 508 may generate the runtime representation from abstract representation 506 using specific rules that map abstract representation 506 to a particular type of runtime representation. These mapping rules may be dependent on the type of runtime tool, characteristics of the target device to be used for displaying the GUI, runtime platform, and/or other factors. Accordingly, mapping rules may be provided for transforming the abstract representation 506 to any number of target runtime representations directed to one or more target GUI runtime platforms. For example, XGL-compliant code generators may conform to semantics of XGL, as described below. XGL-compliant code generators may ensure that the appearance and behavior of the generated user interfaces is preserved across a plurality of target GUI frameworks, while accommodating the differences in the intrinsic characteristics of each and also accommodating the different levels of capability of target devices.

For example, as depicted in example FIG. 5A, an XGL-to-Java compiler 508A may take abstract representation 506 as input and generate Java code 510 for execution by a target device comprising a Java runtime 512. Java runtime 512 may execute Java code 510 to generate or display a GUI 514 on a Java-platform target device. As another example, an XGL-to-Flash compiler 508B may take abstract representation 506 as input and generate Flash code 526 for execution by a target device comprising a Flash runtime 518. Flash runtime 518 may execute Flash code 516 to generate or display a GUI 520 on a target device comprising a Flash platform. As another example, an XGL-to-DHTML (dynamic HTML) interpreter 508C may take abstract representation 506 as input and generate DHTML statements (instructions) on the fly which are then interpreted by a DHTML runtime 522 to generate or display a GUI 524 on a target device comprising a DHTML platform.

It should be apparent that abstract representation 506 may be used to generate GUIs for Extensible Application Markup Language (XAML) or various other runtime platforms and devices. The same abstract representation 506 may be mapped to various runtime representations and device-specific and runtime platform-specific GUIs. In general, in the runtime environment, machine executable instructions specific to a runtime environment may be generated based upon the abstract representation 506 and executed to generate a GUI in the runtime environment. The same XGL representation may be used to generate machine executable instructions specific to different runtime environments and target devices.

According to certain embodiments, the process of mapping a model representation 502 to an abstract representation 506 and mapping an abstract representation 506 to some runtime representation may be automated. For example, design tools may automatically generate an abstract representation for the model representation using XGL and then use the XGL abstract representation to generate GUIs that are customized for specific runtime environments and devices. As previously indicated, mapping rules may be provided for mapping model representations to an XGL representation. Mapping rules may also be provided for mapping an XGL representation to a runtime platform-specific representation.

Since the runtime environment uses abstract representation 506 rather than model representation 502 for runtime processing, the model representation 502 that is created during design-time is decoupled from the runtime environment. Abstract representation 506 thus provides an interface between the modeling environment and the runtime environment. As a result, changes may be made to the design time environment, including changes to model representation 502 or changes that affect model representation 502, generally to not substantially affect or impact the runtime environment or tools used by the runtime environment. Likewise, changes may be made to the runtime environment generally to not substantially affect or impact the design time environment. A designer or other developer can thus concentrate on the design aspects and make changes to the design without having to worry about the runtime dependencies such as the target device platform or programming language dependencies.

FIG. 5B depicts an example process for mapping a model representation 502 to a runtime representation using the example modeling environment 516 of FIG. 5A or some other modeling environment. Model representation 502 may comprise one or more model components and associated properties that describe a data object, such as hosted business objects and interfaces. As described above, at least one of these model components is based on or otherwise associated with these hosted business objects and interfaces. The abstract representation 506 is generated based upon model representation 502. Abstract representation 506 may be generated by the abstract representation generator 504. Abstract representation 506 comprises one or more abstract GUI components and properties associated with the abstract GUI components. As part of generation of abstract representation 506, the model GUI components and their associated properties from the model representation are mapped to abstract GUI components and properties associated with the abstract GUI components. Various mapping rules may be provided to facilitate the mapping. The abstract representation encapsulates both appearance and behavior of a GUI. Therefore, by mapping model components to abstract components, the abstract representation not only specifies the visual appearance of the GUI but also the behavior of the GUI, such as in response to events whether clicking/dragging or scrolling, interactions between GUI components and such.

One or more runtime representations 550a, including GUIs for specific runtime environment platforms, may be generated from abstract representation 506. A device-dependent runtime representation may be generated for a particular type of target device platform to be used for executing and displaying the GUI encapsulated by the abstract representation. The GUIs generated from abstract representation 506 may comprise various types of GUI elements such as buttons, windows, scrollbars, input boxes, etc. Rules may be provided for mapping an abstract representation to a particular runtime representation. Various mapping rules may be provided for different runtime environment platforms.

Methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein provide and use interfaces 320 derived from the business object model 318 suitable for use with more than one business area, for example different departments within a company such as finance, or marketing. Also, they are suitable across industries and across businesses. Interfaces 320 are used during an end-to-end business transaction to transfer business process information in an application-independent manner. For example the interfaces can be used for fulfilling a sales order.

1. Message Overview

To perform an end-to-end business transaction, consistent interfaces are used to create business documents that are sent within messages between heterogeneous programs or modules.

a) Message Categories

As depicted in FIG. 6, the communication between a sender 602 and a recipient 604 can be broken down into basic categories that describe the type of the information exchanged and simultaneously suggest the anticipated reaction of the recipient 604. A message category is a general business classification for the messages. Communication is sender-driven. In other words, the meaning of the message categories is established or formulated from the perspective of the sender 602. The message categories include information 606, notification 608, query 610, response 612, request 614, and confirmation 616.

(1) Information

Information 606 is a message sent from a sender 602 to a recipient 604 concerning a condition or a statement of affairs. No reply to information is expected. Information 606 is sent to make business partners or business applications aware of a situation. Information 606 is not compiled to be application-specific. Examples of “information” are an announcement, advertising, a report, planning information, and a message to the business warehouse.

(2) Notification

A notification 608 is a notice or message that is geared to a service. A sender 602 sends the notification 608 to a recipient 604. No reply is expected for a notification. For example, a billing notification relates to the preparation of an invoice while a dispatched delivery notification relates to preparation for receipt of goods.

(3) Query

A query 610 is a question from a sender 602 to a recipient 604 to which a response 612 is expected. A query 610 implies no assurance or obligation on the part of the sender 602. Examples of a query 610 are whether space is available on a specific flight or whether a specific product is available. These queries do not express the desire for reserving the flight or purchasing the product.

(4) Response

A response 612 is a reply to a query 610. The recipient 604 sends the response 612 to the sender 602. A response 612 generally implies no assurance or obligation on the part of the recipient 604. The sender 602 is not expected to reply. Instead, the process is concluded with the response 612. Depending on the business scenario, a response 612 also may include a commitment, i.e., an assurance or obligation on the part of the recipient 604. Examples of responses 612 are a response stating that space is available on a specific flight or that a specific product is available. With these responses, no reservation was made.

(5) Request

A request 614 is a binding requisition or requirement from a sender 602 to a recipient 604. Depending on the business scenario, the recipient 604 can respond to a request 614 with a confirmation 616. The request 614 is binding on the sender 602. In making the request 614, the sender 602 assumes, for example, an obligation to accept the services rendered in the request 614 under the reported conditions. Examples of a request 614 are a parking ticket, a purchase order, an order for delivery and a job application.

(6) Confirmation

A confirmation 616 is a binding reply that is generally made to a request 614. The recipient 604 sends the confirmation 616 to the sender 602. The information indicated in a confirmation 616, such as deadlines, products, quantities and prices, can deviate from the information of the preceding request 614. A request 614 and confirmation 616 may be used in negotiating processes. A negotiating process can consist of a series of several request 614 and confirmation 616 messages. The confirmation 616 is binding on the recipient 604. For example, 100 units of X may be ordered in a purchase order request; however, only the delivery of 80 units is confirmed in the associated purchase order confirmation.

b) Message Choreography

A message choreography is a template that specifies the sequence of messages between business entities during a given transaction. The sequence with the messages contained in it describes in general the message “lifecycle” as it proceeds between the business entities. If messages from a choreography are used in a business transaction, they appear in the transaction in the sequence determined by the choreography. This illustrates the template character of a choreography, i.e., during an actual transaction, it is not necessary for all messages of the choreography to appear. Those messages that are contained in the transaction, however, follow the sequence within the choreography. A business transaction is thus a derivation of a message choreography. The choreography makes it possible to determine the structure of the individual message types more precisely and distinguish them from one another.

2. Components of the Business Object Model

The overall structure of the business object model ensures the consistency of the interfaces that are derived from the business object model. The derivation ensures that the same business-related subject matter or concept is represented and structured in the same way in all interfaces.

The business object model defines the business-related concepts at a central location for a number of business transactions. In other words, it reflects the decisions made about modeling the business entities of the real world acting in business transactions across industries and business areas. The business object model is defined by the business objects and their relationship to each other (the overall net structure).

Each business object is generally a capsule with an internal hierarchical structure, behavior offered by its operations, and integrity constraints. Business objects are semantically disjoint, i.e., the same business information is represented once. In the business object model, the business objects are arranged in an ordering framework. From left to right, they are arranged according to their existence dependency to each other. For example, the customizing elements may be arranged on the left side of the business object model, the strategic elements may be arranged in the center of the business object model, and the operative elements may be arranged on the right side of the business object model. Similarly, the business objects are arranged from the top to the bottom based on defined order of the business areas, e.g., finance could be arranged at the top of the business object model with CRM below finance and SRM below CRM.

To ensure the consistency of interfaces, the business object model may be built using standardized data types as well as packages to group related elements together, and package templates and entity templates to specify the arrangement of packages and entities within the structure.

a) Data Types

Data types are used to type object entities and interfaces with a structure. This typing can include business semantic. Such data types may include those generally described at pages 96 through 1642 (which are incorporated by reference herein) of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/803,178, filed on May 11, 2007 and entitled “Consistent Set Of Interfaces Derived From A Business Object Model”. For example, the data type BusinessTransactionDocumentID is a unique identifier for a document in a business transaction. Also, as an example, Data type BusinessTransactionDocumentParty contains the information that is exchanged in business documents about a party involved in a business transaction, and includes the party's identity, the party's address, the party's contact person and the contact person's address. BusinessTransactionDocumentParty also includes the role of the party, e.g., a buyer, seller, product recipient, or vendor.

The data types are based on Core Component Types (“CCTs”), which themselves are based on the World Wide Web Consortium (“W3C”) data types. “Global” data types represent a business situation that is described by a fixed structure. Global data types include both context-neutral generic data types (“GDTs”) and context-based context data types (“CDTs”). GDTs contain business semantics, but are application-neutral, i.e., without context. CDTs, on the other hand, are based on GDTs and form either a use-specific view of the GDTs, or a context-specific assembly of GDTs or CDTs. A message is typically constructed with reference to a use and is thus a use-specific assembly of GDTs and CDTs. The data types can be aggregated to complex data types.

To achieve a harmonization across business objects and interfaces, the same subject matter is typed with the same data type. For example, the data type “GeoCoordinates” is built using the data type “Measure” so that the measures in a GeoCoordinate (i.e., the latitude measure and the longitude measure) are represented the same as other “Measures” that appear in the business object model.

b) Entities

Entities are discrete business elements that are used during a business transaction. Entities are not to be confused with business entities or the components that interact to perform a transaction. Rather, “entities” are one of the layers of the business object model and the interfaces. For example, a Catalogue entity is used in a Catalogue Publication Request and a Purchase Order is used in a Purchase Order Request. These entities are created using the data types defined above to ensure the consistent representation of data throughout the entities.

c) Packages

Packages group the entities in the business object model and the resulting interfaces into groups of semantically associated information. Packages also may include “sub”-packages, i.e., the packages may be nested.

Packages may group elements together based on different factors, such as elements that occur together as a rule with regard to a business-related aspect. For example, as depicted in FIG. 7, in a Purchase Order, different information regarding the purchase order, such as the type of payment 702, and payment card 704, are grouped together via the PaymentInformation package 700.

Packages also may combine different components that result in a new object. For example, as depicted in FIG. 8, the components wheels 804, motor 806, and doors 808 are combined to form a composition “Car” 802. The “Car” package 800 includes the wheels, motor and doors as well as the composition “Car.”

Another grouping within a package may be subtypes within a type. In these packages, the components are specialized forms of a generic package. For example, as depicted in FIG. 9, the components Car 904, Boat 906, and Truck 908 can be generalized by the generic term Vehicle 902 in Vehicle package 900. Vehicle in this case is the generic package 910, while Car 912, Boat 914, and Truck 916 are the specializations 918 of the generalized vehicle 910.

Packages also may be used to represent hierarchy levels. For example, as depicted in FIG. 10, the Item Package 1000 includes Item 1002 with subitem xxx 1004, subitem yyy 1006, and subitem zzz 1008.

Packages can be represented in the XML schema as a comment. One advantage of this grouping is that the document structure is easier to read and is more understandable. The names of these packages are assigned by including the object name in brackets with the suffix “Package.” For example, as depicted in FIG. 11, Party package 1100 is enclosed by <PartyPackage> 1102 and </PartyPackage> 1104. Party package 1100 illustratively includes a Buyer Party 1106, identified by <BuyerParty> 1108 and </BuyerParty> 1110, and a Seller Party 1112, identified by <SellerParty> 1114 and </SellerParty>, etc.

d) Relationships

Relationships describe the interdependencies of the entities in the business object model, and are thus an integral part of the business object model.

(1) Cardinality of Relationships

FIG. 12 depicts a graphical representation of the cardinalities between two entities. The cardinality between a first entity and a second entity identifies the number of second entities that could possibly exist for each first entity. Thus, a 1:c cardinality 1200 between entities A 1202 and X 1204 indicates that for each entity A 1202, there is either one or zero 1206 entity X 1204. A 1:1 cardinality 1208 between entities A 1210 and X 1212 indicates that for each entity A 1210, there is exactly one 1214 entity X 1212. A 1:n cardinality 1216 between entities A 1218 and X 1220 indicates that for each entity A 1218, there are one or more 1222 entity Xs 1220. A 1:cn cardinality 1224 between entities A 1226 and X 1228 indicates that for each entity A 1226, there are any number 1230 of entity Xs 1228 (i.e., 0 through n Xs for each A).

(2) Types of Relationships

(a) Composition

A composition or hierarchical relationship type is a strong whole-part relationship which is used to describe the structure within an object. The parts, or dependent entities, represent a semantic refinement or partition of the whole, or less dependent entity. For example, as depicted in FIG. 13, the components 1302, wheels 1304, and doors 1306 may be combined to form the composite 1300 “Car” 1308 using the composition 1310. FIG. 14 depicts a graphical representation of the composition 1410 between composite Car 1408 and components wheel 1404 and door 1406.

(b) Aggregation

An aggregation or an aggregating relationship type is a weak whole-part relationship between two objects. The dependent object is created by the combination of one or several less dependent objects. For example, as depicted in FIG. 15, the properties of a competitor product 1500 are determined by a product 1502 and a competitor 1504. A hierarchical relationship 1506 exists between the product 1502 and the competitor product 1500 because the competitor product 1500 is a component of the product 1502. Therefore, the values of the attributes of the competitor product 1500 are determined by the product 1502. An aggregating relationship 1508 exists between the competitor 1504 and the competitor product 1500 because the competitor product 1500 is differentiated by the competitor 1504. Therefore the values of the attributes of the competitor product 1500 are determined by the competitor 1504.

An association or a referential relationship type describes a relationship between two objects in which the dependent object refers to the less dependent object. For example, as depicted in FIG. 16, a person 1600 has a nationality, and thus, has a reference to its country 1602 of origin. There is an association 1604 between the country 1602 and the person 1600. The values of the attributes of the person 1600 are not determined by the country 1602.

(3) Specialization

Entity types may be divided into subtypes based on characteristics of the entity types. For example, FIG. 17 depicts an entity type “vehicle” 1700 specialized 1702 into subtypes “truck” 1704, “car” 1706, and “ship” 1708. These subtypes represent different aspects or the diversity of the entity type.

Subtypes may be defined based on related attributes. For example, although ships and cars are both vehicles, ships have an attribute, “draft,” that is not found in cars. Subtypes also may be defined based on certain methods that can be applied to entities of this subtype and that modify such entities. For example, “drop anchor” can be applied to ships. If outgoing relationships to a specific object are restricted to a subset, then a subtype can be defined which reflects this subset.

As depicted in FIG. 18, specializations may further be characterized as complete specializations 1800 or incomplete specializations 1802. There is a complete specialization 1800 where each entity of the generalized type belongs to at least one subtype. With an incomplete specialization 1802, there is at least one entity that does not belong to a subtype. Specializations also may be disjoint 1804 or nondisjoint 1806. In a disjoint specialization 1804, each entity of the generalized type belongs to a maximum of one subtype. With a nondisjoint specialization 1806, one entity may belong to more than one subtype. As depicted in FIG. 18, four specialization categories result from the combination of the specialization characteristics.

e) Structural Patterns

(1) Item

An item is an entity type which groups together features of another entity type. Thus, the features for the entity type chart of accounts are grouped together to form the entity type chart of accounts item. For example, a chart of accounts item is a category of values or value flows that can be recorded or represented in amounts of money in accounting, while a chart of accounts is a superordinate list of categories of values or value flows that is defined in accounting.

The cardinality between an entity type and its item is often either 1:n or 1:cn. For example, in the case of the entity type chart of accounts, there is a hierarchical relationship of the cardinality 1:n with the entity type chart of accounts item since a chart of accounts has at least one item in all cases.

(2) Hierarchy

A hierarchy describes the assignment of subordinate entities to superordinate entities and vice versa, where several entities of the same type are subordinate entities that have, at most, one directly superordinate entity. For example, in the hierarchy depicted in FIG. 19, entity B 1902 is subordinate to entity A 1900, resulting in the relationship (A,B) 1912. Similarly, entity C 1904 is subordinate to entity A 1900, resulting in the relationship (A,C) 1914. Entity D 1906 and entity E 1908 are subordinate to entity B 1902, resulting in the relationships (B,D) 1916 and (B,E) 1918, respectively. Entity F 1910 is subordinate to entity C 1904, resulting in the relationship (C,F) 1920.

Because each entity has at most one superordinate entity, the cardinality between a subordinate entity and its superordinate entity is 1:c. Similarly, each entity may have 0, 1 or many subordinate entities. Thus, the cardinality between a superordinate entity and its subordinate entity is 1:cn. FIG. 20 depicts a graphical representation of a Closing Report Structure Item hierarchy 2000 for a Closing Report Structure Item 2002. The hierarchy illustrates the 1:c cardinality 2004 between a subordinate entity and its superordinate entity, and the 1:cn cardinality 2006 between a superordinate entity and its subordinate entity.

3. Creation of the Business Object Model

FIGS. 21A-B depict the steps performed using methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein to create a business object model. Although some steps are described as being performed by a computer, these steps may alternatively be performed manually, or computer-assisted, or any combination thereof. Likewise, although some steps are described as being performed by a computer, these steps may also be computer-assisted, or performed manually, or any combination thereof.

As discussed above, the designers create message choreographies that specify the sequence of messages between business entities during a transaction. After identifying the messages, the developers identify the fields contained in one of the messages (step 2100, FIG. 21A). The designers then determine whether each field relates to administrative data or is part of the object (step 2102). Thus, the first eleven fields identified below in the left column are related to administrative data, while the remaining fields are part of the object.

MessageID
Admin

ReferenceID

CreationDate

SenderID

AdditionalSenderID

ContactPersonID

SenderAddress

RecipientID

AdditionalRecipientID

ContactPersonID

RecipientAddress

ID
Main Object

AdditionalID

PostingDate

LastChangeDate

AcceptanceStatus

Note

CompleteTransmission Indicator

Buyer

BuyerOrganisationName

Person Name

FunctionalTitle

DepartmentName

CountryCode

StreetPostalCode

POBox Postal Code

Company Postal Code

City Name

DistrictName

PO Box ID

PO Box Indicator

PO Box Country Code

PO Box Region Code

PO Box City Name

Street Name

House ID

Building ID

Floor ID

Room ID

Care Of Name

AddressDescription

Telefonnumber

MobileNumber

Facsimile

Email

Seller

SellerAddress

Location

LocationType

DeliveryItemGroupID

DeliveryPriority

DeliveryCondition

TransferLocation

NumberofPartialDelivery

QuantityTolerance

MaximumLeadTime

TransportServiceLevel

TranportCondition

TransportDescription

CashDiscountTerms

PaymentForm

PaymentCardID

PaymentCardReferenceID

SequenceID

Holder

ExpirationDate

AttachmentID

AttachmentFilename

DescriptionofMessage

ConfirmationDescriptionof Message

FollowUpActivity

ItemID

ParentItemID

HierarchyType

ProductID

ProductType

ProductNote

ProductCategoryID

Amount

BaseQuantity

ConfirmedAmount

ConfirmedBaseQuantity

ItemBuyer

ItemBuyerOrganisationName

Person Name

FunctionalTitle

DepartmentName

CountryCode

StreetPostalCode

POBox Postal Code

Company Postal Code

City Name

DistrictName

PO Box ID

PO Box Indicator

PO Box Country Code

PO Box Region Code

PO Box City Name

Street Name

House ID

Building ID

Floor ID

Room ID

Care Of Name

AddressDescription

Telefonnumber

MobilNumber

Facsimile

Email

ItemSeller

ItemSellerAddress

ItemLocation

ItemLocationType

ItemDeliveryItemGroupID

ItemDeliveryPriority

ItemDeliveryCondition

ItemTransferLocation

ItemNumberofPartialDelivery

ItemQuantityTolerance

ItemMaximumLeadTime

ItemTransportServiceLevel

ItemTranportCondition

ItemTransportDescription

ContractReference

QuoteReference

CatalogueReference

ItemAttachmentID

ItemAttachmentFilename

ItemDescription

ScheduleLineID

DeliveryPeriod

Quantity

ConfirmedScheduleLineID

ConfirmedDeliveryPeriod

ConfirmedQuantity

Next, the designers determine the proper name for the object according to the ISO 11179 naming standards (step 2104). In the example above, the proper name for the “Main Object” is “Purchase Order.” After naming the object, the system that is creating the business object model determines whether the object already exists in the business object model (step 2106). If the object already exists, the system integrates new attributes from the message into the existing object (step 2108), and the process is complete.

If at step 2106 the system determines that the object does not exist in the business object model, the designers model the internal object structure (step 2110). To model the internal structure, the designers define the components. For the above example, the designers may define the components identified below.

ID
Purchase

AdditionalID
Order

PostingDate

LastChangeDate

AcceptanceStatus

Note

CompleteTransmission

Indicator

Buyer

Buyer

BuyerOrganisationName

Person Name

FunctionalTitle

DepartmentName

CountryCode

StreetPostalCode

POBox Postal Code

Company Postal Code

City Name

DistrictName

PO Box ID

PO Box Indicator

PO Box Country Code

PO Box Region Code

PO Box City Name

Street Name

House ID

Building ID

Floor ID

Room ID

Care Of Name

AddressDescription

Telefonnumber

MobileNumber

Facsimile

Email

Seller

Seller

SellerAddress

Location

Location

LocationType

DeliveryItemGroupID

Delivery-

DeliveryPriority

Terms

DeliveryCondition

TransferLocation

NumberofPartialDelivery

QuantityTolerance

MaximumLeadTime

TransportServiceLevel

TranportCondition

TransportDescription

CashDiscountTerms

PaymentForm

Payment

PaymentCardID

PaymentCardReferenceID

SequenceID

Holder

ExpirationDate

AttachmentID

AttachmentFilename

DescriptionofMessage

ConfirmationDescriptionof

Message

FollowUpActivity

ItemID

Purchase

ParentItemID

Order

HierarchyType

Item

ProductID

Product

ProductType

ProductNote

ProductCategoryID

ProductCategory

Amount

BaseQuantity

ConfirmedAmount

ConfirmedBaseQuantity

ItemBuyer

Buyer

ItemBuyerOrganisation

Name

Person Name

FunctionalTitle

DepartmentName

CountryCode

StreetPostalCode

POBox Postal Code

Company Postal Code

City Name

DistrictName

PO Box ID

PO Box Indicator

PO Box Country Code

PO Box Region Code

PO Box City Name

Street Name

House ID

Building ID

Floor ID

Room ID

Care Of Name

AddressDescription

Telefonnumber

MobilNumber

Facsimile

Email

ItemSeller

Seller

ItemSellerAddress

ItemLocation

Location

ItemLocationType

ItemDeliveryItemGroupID

ItemDeliveryPriority

ItemDeliveryCondition

ItemTransferLocation

ItemNumberofPartial

Delivery

ItemQuantityTolerance

ItemMaximumLeadTime

ItemTransportServiceLevel

ItemTranportCondition

ItemTransportDescription

ContractReference

Contract

QuoteReference

Quote

CatalogueReference

Catalogue

ItemAttachmentID

ItemAttachmentFilename

ItemDescription

ScheduleLineID

DeliveryPeriod

Quantity

ConfirmedScheduleLineID

ConfirmedDeliveryPeriod

ConfirmedQuantity

During the step of modeling the internal structure, the designers also model the complete internal structure by identifying the compositions of the components and the corresponding cardinalities, as shown below.

PurchaseOrder

1

Buyer

0 . . . 1

Address

0 . . . 1

ContactPerson

0 . . . 1

Address
0 . . . 1

Seller

0 . . . 1

Location

0 . . . 1

Address

0 . . . 1

DeliveryTerms

0 . . . 1

Incoterms

0 . . . 1

PartialDelivery

0 . . . 1

QuantityTolerance

0 . . . 1

Transport

0 . . . 1

CashDiscount

0 . . . 1

Terms

MaximumCashDiscount

0 . . . 1

NormalCashDiscount

0 . . . 1

PaymentForm

0 . . . 1

PaymentCard

0 . . . 1

Attachment

0 . . . n

Description

0 . . . 1

Confirmation

0 . . . 1

Description

Item

0 . . . n

HierarchyRelationship

0 . . . 1

Product

0 . . . 1

ProductCategory

0 . . . 1

Price

0 . . . 1

NetunitPrice
0 . . . 1

ConfirmedPrice

0 . . . 1

NetunitPrice
0 . . . 1

Buyer

0 . . . 1

Seller

0 . . . 1

Location

0 . . . 1

DeliveryTerms

0 . . . 1

Attachment

0 . . . n

Description

0 . . . 1

ConfirmationDescription

0 . . . 1

ScheduleLine

0 . . . n

DeliveryPeriod
1

ConfirmedScheduleLine

0 . . . n

After modeling the internal object structure, the developers identify the subtypes and generalizations for all objects and components (step 2112). For example, the Purchase Order may have subtypes Purchase Order Update, Purchase Order Cancellation and Purchase Order Information. Purchase Order Update may include Purchase Order Request, Purchase Order Change, and Purchase Order Confirmation. Moreover, Party may be identified as the generalization of Buyer and Seller. The subtypes and generalizations for the above example are shown below.

Purchase

1

Order

PurchaseOrder

Update

PurchaseOrder Request

PurchaseOrder Change

PurchaseOrder

Confirmation

PurchaseOrder

Cancellation

PurchaseOrder

Information

Party

BuyerParty

0 . . . 1

Address

0 . . . 1

ContactPerson

0 . . . 1

Address
0 . . . 1

SellerParty

0 . . . 1

Location

ShipToLocation

0 . . . 1

Address

0 . . . 1

ShipFromLocation

0 . . . 1

Address

0 . . . 1

DeliveryTerms

0 . . . 1

Incoterms

0 . . . 1

PartialDelivery

0 . . . 1

QuantityTolerance

0 . . . 1

Transport

0 . . . 1

CashDiscount

0 . . . 1

Terms

MaximumCash Discount

0 . . . 1

NormalCashDiscount

0 . . . 1

PaymentForm

0 . . . 1

PaymentCard

0 . . . 1

Attachment

0 . . . n

Description

0 . . . 1

Confirmation

0 . . . 1

Description

Item

0 . . . n

HierarchyRelationship

0 . . . 1

Product

0 . . . 1

ProductCategory

0 . . . 1

Price

0 . . . 1

NetunitPrice

0 . . . 1

ConfirmedPrice

0 . . . 1

NetunitPrice

0 . . . 1

Party

BuyerParty

0 . . . 1

SellerParty

0 . . . 1

Location

ShipTo

0 . . . 1

Location

ShipFrom

0 . . . 1

Location

DeliveryTerms

0 . . . 1

Attachment

0 . . . n

Description

0 . . . 1

Confirmation

0 . . . 1

Description

ScheduleLine

0 . . . n

Delivery

1

Period

ConfirmedScheduleLine

0 . . . n

After identifying the subtypes and generalizations, the developers assign the attributes to these components (step 2114). The attributes for a portion of the components are shown below.

Purchase

1

Order

ID

1

SellerID

0 . . . 1

BuyerPosting

0 . . . 1

DateTime

BuyerLast

0 . . . 1

ChangeDate

Time

SellerPosting

0 . . . 1

DateTime

SellerLast

0 . . . 1

ChangeDate

Time

Acceptance

0 . . . 1

StatusCode

Note

0 . . . 1

ItemList

0 . . . 1

Complete

Transmission

Indicator

BuyerParty

0 . . . 1

StandardID

0 . . . n

BuyerID

0 . . . 1

SellerID

0 . . . 1

Address

0 . . . 1

ContactPerson

0 . . . 1

BuyerID
0 . . . 1

SellerID
0 . . . 1

Address
0 . . . 1

SellerParty

0 . . . 1

Product

0 . . . 1

RecipientParty

VendorParty

0 . . . 1

Manufacturer

0 . . . 1

Party

BillToParty

0 . . . 1

PayerParty

0 . . . 1

CarrierParty

0 . . . 1

ShipTo

0 . . . 1

Location

StandardID

0 . . . n

BuyerID

0 . . . 1

SellerID

0 . . . 1

Address

0 . . . 1

ShipFrom

0 . . . 1

Location

The system then determines whether the component is one of the object nodes in the business object model (step 2116, FIG. 21B). If the system determines that the component is one of the object nodes in the business object model, the system integrates a reference to the corresponding object node from the business object model into the object (step 2118). In the above example, the system integrates the reference to the Buyer party represented by an ID and the reference to the ShipToLocation represented by an into the object, as shown below. The attributes that were formerly located in the PurchaseOrder object are now assigned to the new found object party. Thus, the attributes are removed from the PurchaseOrder object.

PurchaseOrder

ID

SellerID

BuyerPostingDateTime

BuyerLastChangeDateTime

SellerPostingDateTime

SellerLastChangeDateTime

AcceptanceStatusCode

Note

ItemListComplete

TransmissionIndicator

BuyerParty

ID

SellerParty

ProductRecipientParty

VendorParty

ManufacturerParty

BillToParty

PayerParty

CarrierParty

ShipToLocation

ID

ShipFromLocation

During the integration step, the designers classify the relationship (i.e., aggregation or association) between the object node and the object being integrated into the business object model. The system also integrates the new attributes into the object node (step 2120). If at step 2116, the system determines that the component is not in the business object model, the system adds the component to the business object model (step 2122).

Regardless of whether the component was in the business object model at step 2116, the next step in creating the business object model is to add the integrity rules (step 2124). There are several levels of integrity rules and constraints which should be described. These levels include consistency rules between attributes, consistency rules between components, and consistency rules to other objects. Next, the designers determine the services offered, which can be accessed via interfaces (step 2126). The services offered in the example above include PurchaseOrderCreateRequest, PurchaseOrderCancellationRequest, and PurchaseOrderReleaseRequest. The system then receives an indication of the location for the object in the business object model (step 2128). After receiving the indication of the location, the system integrates the object into the business object model (step 2130).

4. Structure of the Business Object Model

The business object model, which serves as the basis for the process of generating consistent interfaces, includes the elements contained within the interfaces. These elements are arranged in a hierarchical structure within the business object model.

5. Interfaces Derived from Business Object Model

Interfaces are the starting point of the communication between two business entities. The structure of each interface determines how one business entity communicates with another business entity. The business entities may act as a unified whole when, based on the business scenario, the business entities know what an interface contains from a business perspective and how to fill the individual elements or fields of the interface. As illustrated in FIG. 27A, communication between components takes place via messages that contain business documents (e.g., business document 27002). The business document 27002 ensures a holistic business-related understanding for the recipient of the message. The business documents are created and accepted or consumed by interfaces, specifically by inbound and outbound interfaces. The interface structure and, hence, the structure of the business document are derived by a mapping rule. This mapping rule is known as “hierarchization.” An interface structure thus has a hierarchical structure created based on the leading business object 27000. The interface represents a usage-specific, hierarchical view of the underlying usage-neutral object model.

As illustrated in FIG. 27B, several business document objects 27006, 27008, and 27010 as overlapping views may be derived for a given leading object 27004. Each business document object results from the object model by hierarchization.

To illustrate the hierarchization process, FIG. 27C depicts an example of an object model 27012 (i.e., a portion of the business object model) that is used to derive a service operation signature (business document object structure). As depicted, leading object X 27014 in the object model 27012 is integrated in a net of object A 27016, object B 27018, and object C 27020. Initially, the parts of the leading object 27014 that are required for the business object document are adopted. In one variation, all parts required for a business document object are adopted from leading object 27014 (making such an operation a maximal service operation). Based on these parts, the relationships to the superordinate objects (i.e., objects A, B, and C from which object X depends) are inverted. In other words, these objects are adopted as dependent or subordinate objects in the new business document object.

For example, object A 27016, object B 27018, and object C 27020 have information that characterize object X. Because object A 27016, object B 27018, and object C 27020 are superordinate to leading object X 27014, the dependencies of these relationships change so that object A 27016, object B 27018, and object C 27020 become dependent and subordinate to leading object X 27014. This procedure is known as “derivation of the business document object by hierarchization.”

Business-related objects generally have an internal structure (parts). This structure can be complex and reflect the individual parts of an object and their mutual dependency. When creating the operation signature, the internal structure of an object is strictly hierarchized. Thus, dependent parts keep their dependency structure, and relationships between the parts within the object that do not represent the hierarchical structure are resolved by prioritizing one of the relationships.

Relationships of object X to external objects that are referenced and whose information characterizes object X are added to the operation signature. Such a structure can be quite complex (see, for example, FIG. 27D). The cardinality to these referenced objects is adopted as 1:1 or 1:C, respectively. By this, the direction of the dependency changes. The required parts of this referenced object are adopted identically, both in their cardinality and in their dependency arrangement.

The newly created business document object contains all required information, including the incorporated master data information of the referenced objects. As depicted in FIG. 27D, components Xi in leading object X 27022 are adopted directly. The relationship of object X 27022 to object A 27024, object B 27028, and object C 27026 are inverted, and the parts required by these objects are added as objects that depend from object X 27022. As depicted, all of object A 27024 is adopted. B3 and B4 are adopted from object B 27028, but B1 is not adopted. From object C 27026, C2 and C1 are adopted, but C3 is not adopted.

FIG. 27E depicts the business document object X 27030 created by this hierarchization process. As shown, the arrangement of the elements corresponds to their dependency levels, which directly leads to a corresponding representation as an XML structure 27032.

The following provides certain rules that can be adopted singly or in combination with regard to the hierarchization process. A business document object always refers to a leading business document object and is derived from this object. The name of the root entity in the business document entity is the name of the business object or the name of a specialization of the business object or the name of a service specific view onto the business object. The nodes and elements of the business object that are relevant (according to the semantics of the associated message type) are contained as entities and elements in the business document object.

The name of a business document entity is predefined by the name of the corresponding business object node. The name of the superordinate entity is not repeated in the name of the business document entity. The “full” semantic name results from the concatenation of the entity names along the hierarchical structure of the business document object.

The structure of the business document object is, except for deviations due to hierarchization, the same as the structure of the business object. The cardinalities of the business document object nodes and elements are adopted identically or more restrictively to the business document object. An object from which the leading business object is dependent can be adopted to the business document object. For this arrangement, the relationship is inverted, and the object (or its parts, respectively) are hierarchically subordinated in the business document object.

Nodes in the business object representing generalized business information can be adopted as explicit entities to the business document object (generally speaking, multiply TypeCodes out). When this adoption occurs, the entities are named according to their more specific semantic (name of TypeCode becomes prefix). Party nodes of the business object are modeled as explicit entities for each party role in the business document object. These nodes are given the name <Prefix><Party Role>Party, for example, BuyerParty, ItemBuyerParty. BTDReference nodes are modeled as separate entities for each reference type in the business document object. These nodes are given the name <Qualifier><BO><Node>Reference, for example SalesOrderReference, OriginSalesOrderReference, SalesOrderItemReference. A product node in the business object comprises all of the information on the Product, ProductCategory, and Batch. This information is modeled in the business document object as explicit entities for Product, ProductCategory, and Batch.

Entities which are connected by a 1:1 relationship as a result of hierarchization can be combined to a single entity, if they are semantically equivalent. Such a combination can often occurs if a node in the business document object that results from an assignment node is removed because it does not have any elements.

The message type structure is typed with data types. Elements are typed by GDTs according to their business objects. Aggregated levels are typed with message type specific data types (Intermediate Data Types), with their names being built according to the corresponding paths in the message type structure. The whole message type structured is typed by a message data type with its name being built according to the root entity with the suffix “Message”. For the message type, the message category (e.g., information, notification, query, response, request, confirmation, etc.) is specified according to the suited transaction communication pattern.

In one variation, the derivation by hierarchization can be initiated by specifying a leading business object and a desired view relevant for a selected service operation. This view determines the business document object. The leading business object can be the source object, the target object, or a third object. Thereafter, the parts of the business object required for the view are determined. The parts are connected to the root node via a valid path along the hierarchy. Thereafter, one or more independent objects (object parts, respectively) referenced by the leading object which are relevant for the service may be determined (provided that a relationship exists between the leading object and the one or more independent objects).

Once the selection is finalized, relevant nodes of the leading object node that are structurally identical to the message type structure can then be adopted. If nodes are adopted from independent objects or object parts, the relationships to such independent objects or object parts are inverted. Linearization can occur such that a business object node containing certain TypeCodes is represented in the message type structure by explicit entities (an entity for each value of the TypeCode). The structure can be reduced by checking all 1:1 cardinalities in the message type structure. Entities can be combined if they are semantically equivalent, one of the entities carries no elements, or an entity solely results from an n:m assignment in the business object.

After the hierarchization is completed, information regarding transmission of the business document object (e.g., CompleteTransmissionIndicator, ActionCodes, message category, etc.) can be added. A standardized message header can be added to the message type structure and the message structure can be typed. Additionally, the message category for the message type can be designated.

Invoice Request and Invoice Confirmation are examples of interfaces. These invoice interfaces are used to exchange invoices and invoice confirmations between an invoicing party and an invoice recipient (such as between a seller and a buyer) in a B2B process. Companies can create invoices in electronic as well as in paper form. Traditional methods of communication, such as mail or fax, for invoicing are cost intensive, prone to error, and relatively slow, since the data is recorded manually. Electronic communication eliminates such problems. The motivating business scenarios for the Invoice Request and Invoice Confirmation interfaces are the Procure to Stock (PTS) and Sell from Stock (SFS) scenarios. In the PTS scenario, the parties use invoice interfaces to purchase and settle goods. In the SFS scenario, the parties use invoice interfaces to sell and invoice goods. The invoice interfaces directly integrate the applications implementing them and also form the basis for mapping data to widely-used XML standard formats such as RosettaNet, PIDX, xCBL, and CIDX.

The invoicing party may use two different messages to map a B2B invoicing process: (1) the invoicing party sends the message type InvoiceRequest to the invoice recipient to start a new invoicing process; and (2) the invoice recipient sends the message type InvoiceConfirmation to the invoicing party to confirm or reject an entire invoice or to temporarily assign it the status “pending.”

An InvoiceRequest is a legally binding notification of claims or liabilities for delivered goods and rendered services—usually, a payment request for the particular goods and services. The message type InvoiceRequest is based on the message data type InvoiceMessage. The InvoiceRequest message (as defined) transfers invoices in the broader sense. This includes the specific invoice (request to settle a liability), the debit memo, and the credit memo.

InvoiceConfirmation is a response sent by the recipient to the invoicing party confirming or rejecting the entire invoice received or stating that it has been assigned temporarily the status “pending.” The message type InvoiceConfirmation is based on the message data type InvoiceMessage. An InvoiceConfirmation is not mandatory in a B2B invoicing process, however, it automates collaborative processes and dispute management.

Usually, the invoice is created after it has been confirmed that the goods were delivered or the service was provided. The invoicing party (such as the seller) starts the invoicing process by sending an InvoiceRequest message. Upon receiving the InvoiceRequest message, the invoice recipient (for instance, the buyer) can use the InvoiceConfirmation message to completely accept or reject the invoice received or to temporarily assign it the status “pending.” The InvoiceConfirmation is not a negotiation tool (as is the case in order management), since the options available are either to accept or reject the entire invoice. The invoice data in the InvoiceConfirmation message merely confirms that the invoice has been forwarded correctly and does not communicate any desired changes to the invoice. Therefore, the InvoiceConfirmation includes the precise invoice data that the invoice recipient received and checked. If the invoice recipient rejects an invoice, the invoicing party can send a new invoice after checking the reason for rejection (AcceptanceStatus and ConfirmationDescription at Invoice and InvoiceItem level). If the invoice recipient does not respond, the invoice is generally regarded as being accepted and the invoicing party can expect payment.

FIGS. 22A-F depict a flow diagram of the steps performed by methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein to generate an interface from the business object model. Although described as being performed by a computer, these steps may alternatively be performed manually, or using any combination thereof. The process begins when the system receives an indication of a package template from the designer, i.e., the designer provides a package template to the system (step 2200).

Package templates specify the arrangement of packages within a business transaction document. Package templates are used to define the overall structure of the messages sent between business entities. Methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein use package templates in conjunction with the business object model to derive the interfaces.

The system also receives an indication of the message type from the designer (step 2202). The system selects a package from the package template (step 2204), and receives an indication from the designer whether the package is required for the interface (step 2206). If the package is not required for the interface, the system removes the package from the package template (step 2208). The system then continues this analysis for the remaining packages within the package template (step 2210).

If, at step 2206, the package is required for the interface, the system copies the entity template from the package in the business object model into the package in the package template (step 2212, FIG. 22B). The system determines whether there is a specialization in the entity template (step 2214). If the system determines that there is a specialization in the entity template, the system selects a subtype for the specialization (step 2216). The system may either select the subtype for the specialization based on the message type, or it may receive this information from the designer. The system then determines whether there are any other specializations in the entity template (step 2214). When the system determines that there are no specializations in the entity template, the system continues this analysis for the remaining packages within the package template (step 2210, FIG. 22A).

At step 2210, after the system completes its analysis for the packages within the package template, the system selects one of the packages remaining in the package template (step 2218, FIG. 22C), and selects an entity from the package (step 2220). The system receives an indication from the designer whether the entity is required for the interface (step 2222). If the entity is not required for the interface, the system removes the entity from the package template (step 2224). The system then continues this analysis for the remaining entities within the package (step 2226), and for the remaining packages within the package template (step 2228).

If, at step 2222, the entity is required for the interface, the system retrieves the cardinality between a superordinate entity and the entity from the business object model (step 2230, FIG. 22D). The system also receives an indication of the cardinality between the superordinate entity and the entity from the designer (step 2232). The system then determines whether the received cardinality is a subset of the business object model cardinality (step 2234). If the received cardinality is not a subset of the business object model cardinality, the system sends an error message to the designer (step 2236). If the received cardinality is a subset of the business object model cardinality, the system assigns the received cardinality as the cardinality between the superordinate entity and the entity (step 2238). The system then continues this analysis for the remaining entities within the package (step 2226, FIG. 22C), and for the remaining packages within the package template (step 2228).

The system then selects a leading object from the package template (step 2240, FIG. 22E). The system determines whether there is an entity superordinate to the leading object (step 2242). If the system determines that there is an entity superordinate to the leading object, the system reverses the direction of the dependency (step 2244) and adjusts the cardinality between the leading object and the entity (step 2246). The system performs this analysis for entities that are superordinate to the leading object (step 2242). If the system determines that there are no entities superordinate to the leading object, the system identifies the leading object as analyzed (step 2248).

The system then selects an entity that is subordinate to the leading object (step 2250, FIG. 22F). The system determines whether any non-analyzed entities are superordinate to the selected entity (step 2252). If a non-analyzed entity is superordinate to the selected entity, the system reverses the direction of the dependency (step 2254) and adjusts the cardinality between the selected entity and the non-analyzed entity (step 2256). The system performs this analysis for non-analyzed entities that are superordinate to the selected entity (step 2252). If the system determines that there are no non-analyzed entities superordinate to the selected entity, the system identifies the selected entity as analyzed (step 2258), and continues this analysis for entities that are subordinate to the leading object (step 2260). After the packages have been analyzed, the system substitutes the BusinessTransactionDocument (“BTD”) in the package template with the name of the interface (step 2262). This includes the “BTD” in the BTDItem package and the “BTD” in the BTDItemScheduleLine package.

6. Use of an Interface

The XI stores the interfaces (as an interface type). At runtime, the sending party's program instantiates the interface to create a business document, and sends the business document in a message to the recipient. The messages are preferably defined using XML. In the example depicted in FIG. 23, the Buyer 2300 uses an application 2306 in its system to instantiate an interface 2308 and create an interface object or business document object 2310. The Buyer's application 2306 uses data that is in the sender's component-specific structure and fills the business document object 2310 with the data. The Buyer's application 2306 then adds message identification 2312 to the business document and places the business document into a message 2302. The Buyer's application 2306 sends the message 2302 to the Vendor 2304. The Vendor 2304 uses an application 2314 in its system to receive the message 2302 and store the business document into its own memory. The Vendor's application 2314 unpacks the message 2302 using the corresponding interface 2316 stored in its XI to obtain the relevant data from the interface object or business document object 2318.

From the component's perspective, the interface is represented by an interface proxy 2400, as depicted in FIG. 24. The proxies 2400 shield the components 2402 of the sender and recipient from the technical details of sending messages 2404 via XI. In particular, as depicted in FIG. 25, at the sending end, the Buyer 2500 uses an application 2510 in its system to call an implemented method 2512, which generates the outbound proxy 2506. The outbound proxy 2506 parses the internal data structure of the components and converts them to the XML structure in accordance with the business document object. The outbound proxy 2506 packs the document into a message 2502. Transport, routing and mapping the XML message to the recipient 28304 is done by the routing system (XI, modeling environment 516, etc.).

When the message arrives, the recipient's inbound proxy 2508 calls its component-specific method 2514 for creating a document. The proxy 2508 at the receiving end downloads the data and converts the XML structure into the internal data structure of the recipient component 2504 for further processing.

As depicted in FIG. 26A, a message 2600 includes a message header 2602 and a business document 2604. The message 2600 also may include an attachment 2606. For example, the sender may attach technical drawings, detailed specifications or pictures of a product to a purchase order for the product. The business document 2604 includes a business document message header 2608 and the business document object 2610. The business document message header 2608 includes administrative data, such as the message ID and a message description. As discussed above, the structure 2612 of the business document object 2610 is derived from the business object model 2614. Thus, there is a strong correlation between the structure of the business document object and the structure of the business object model. The business document object 2610 forms the core of the message 2600.

In collaborative processes as well as Q&A processes, messages should refer to documents from previous messages. A simple business document object ID or object ID is insufficient to identify individual messages uniquely because several versions of the same business document object can be sent during a transaction. A business document object ID with a version number also is insufficient because the same version of a business document object can be sent several times. Thus, messages require several identifiers during the course of a transaction.

As depicted in FIG. 26B, the message header 2618 in message 2616 includes a technical ID (“ID4”) 2622 that identifies the address for a computer to route the message. The sender's system manages the technical ID 2622.

The administrative information in the business document message header 2624 of the payload or business document 2620 includes a BusinessDocumentMessageID (“ID3”) 2628. The business entity or component 2632 of the business entity manages and sets the BusinessDocumentMessageID 2628. The business entity or component 2632 also can refer to other business documents using the BusinessDocumentMessageID 2628. The receiving component 2632 requires no knowledge regarding the structure of this ID. The BusinessDocumentMessageID 2628 is, as an ID, unique. Creation of a message refers to a point in time. No versioning is typically expressed by the ID. Besides the BusinessDocumentMessageID 2628, there also is a business document object ID 2630, which may include versions.

The component 2632 also adds its own component object ID 2634 when the business document object is stored in the component. The component object ID 2634 identifies the business document object when it is stored within the component. However, not all communication partners may be aware of the internal structure of the component object ID 2634. Some components also may include a versioning in their ID 2634.

7. Use of Interfaces Across Industries

Methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein provide interfaces that may be used across different business areas for different industries. Indeed, the interfaces derived using methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein may be mapped onto the interfaces of different industry standards. Unlike the interfaces provided by any given standard that do not include the interfaces required by other standards, methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein provide a set of consistent interfaces that correspond to the interfaces provided by different industry standards. Due to the different fields provided by each standard, the interface from one standard does not easily map onto another standard. By comparison, to map onto the different industry standards, the interfaces derived using methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein include most of the fields provided by the interfaces of different industry standards. Missing fields may easily be included into the business object model. Thus, by derivation, the interfaces can be extended consistently by these fields. Thus, methods and systems consistent with the subject matter described herein provide consistent interfaces or services that can be used across different industry standards.

For example, FIG. 28 illustrates an example method 2800 for service enabling. In this example, the enterprise services infrastructure may offer one common and standard-based service infrastructure. Further, one central enterprise services repository may support uniform service definition, implementation and usage of services for user interface, and cross-application communication. In step 2801, a business object is defined via a process component model in a process modeling phase. Next, in step 2802, the business object is designed within an enterprise services repository. For example, FIG. 29 provides a graphical representation of one of the business objects 2900. As shown, an innermost layer or kernel 2901 of the business object may represent the business object's inherent data. Inherent data may include, for example, an employee's name, age, status, position, address, etc. A second layer 2902 may be considered the business object's logic. Thus, the layer 2902 includes the rules for consistently embedding the business object in a system environment as well as constraints defining values and domains applicable to the business object. For example, one such constraint may limit sale of an item only to a customer with whom a company has a business relationship. A third layer 2903 includes validation options for accessing the business object. For example, the third layer 2903 defines the business object's interface that may be interfaced by other business objects or applications. A fourth layer 2904 is the access layer that defines technologies that may externally access the business object.

Accordingly, the third layer 2903 separates the inherent data of the first layer 2901 and the technologies used to access the inherent data. As a result of the described structure, the business object reveals only an interface that includes a set of clearly defined methods. Thus, applications access the business object via those defined methods. An application wanting access to the business object and the data associated therewith usually includes the information or data to execute the clearly defined methods of the business object's interface. Such clearly defined methods of the business object's interface represent the business object's behavior. That is, when the methods are executed, the methods may change the business object's data. Therefore, an application may utilize any business object by providing the information or data without having any concern for the details related to the internal operation of the business object. Returning to method 2800, a service provider class and data dictionary elements are generated within a development environment at step 2803. In step 2804, the service provider class is implemented within the development environment.

FIG. 30 illustrates an example method 3000 for a process agent framework. For example, the process agent framework may be the basic infrastructure to integrate business processes located in different deployment units. It may support a loose coupling of these processes by message based integration. A process agent may encapsulate the process integration logic and separate it from business logic of business objects. As shown in FIG. 30, an integration scenario and a process component interaction model are defined during a process modeling phase in step 3001. In step 3002, required interface operations and process agents are identified during the process modeling phase also. Next, in step 3003, a service interface, service interface operations, and the related process agent are created within an enterprise services repository as defined in the process modeling phase. In step 3004, a proxy class for the service interface is generated. Next, in step 3005, a process agent class is created and the process agent is registered. In step 3006, the agent class is implemented within a development environment.

FIG. 31 illustrates an example method 3100 for status and action management (S&AM). For example, status and action management may describe the life cycle of a business object (node) by defining actions and statuses (as their result) of the business object (node), as well as, the constraints that the statuses put on the actions. In step 3101, the status and action management schemas are modeled per a relevant business object node within an enterprise services repository. In step 3102, existing statuses and actions from the business object model are used or new statuses and actions are created. Next, in step 3103, the schemas are simulated to verify correctness and completeness. In step 3104, missing actions, statuses, and derivations are created in the business object model with the enterprise services repository. Continuing with method 3100, the statuses are related to corresponding elements in the node in step 3105. In step 3106, status code GDT's are generated, including constants and code list providers. Next, in step 3107, a proxy class for a business object service provider is generated and the proxy class S&AM schemas are imported. In step 3108, the service provider is implemented and the status and action management runtime interface is called from the actions.

Regardless of the particular hardware or software architecture used, the disclosed systems or software are generally capable of implementing business objects and deriving (or otherwise utilizing) consistent interfaces that are suitable for use across industries, across businesses, and across different departments within a business in accordance with some or all of the following description. In short, system 100 contemplates using any appropriate combination and arrangement of logical elements to implement some or all of the described functionality.

Moreover, the preceding flowcharts and accompanying description illustrate example methods. The present services environment contemplates using or implementing any suitable technique for performing these and other tasks. It will be understood that these methods are for illustration purposes only and that the described or similar techniques may be performed at any appropriate time, including concurrently, individually, or in combination. In addition, many of the steps in these flowcharts may take place simultaneously and/or in different orders than as shown. Moreover, the services environment may use methods with additional steps, fewer steps, and/or different steps, so long as the methods remain appropriate.

FIG. 32 illustrates an example object model for a Feed Event business object 32000. Specifically, the object model depicts interactions among various components of the Feed Event business object 32000, as well as external components that interact with the Feed Event business object 32000 (shown here as 32002 and 32006). The Feed Event business object 32000 includes one or more elements, such as a Feed Event entity 32004. In some implementations, the elements included in the Feed Event business object 32000 can be hierarchical. Some or all of the elements included in the Feed Event business object 32000 can correspond to packages and/or entities in one or more message data types.

The Business Object Feed Event is an event or user input for which users are notified via a Feed. The business object Feed Event belongs to the process component User Convenience Accessories. The business object Feed Event belongs to the deployment unit Foundation. In some implementations, if a valid “Feed Event Subscription” to a particular business object event or situation exists, a snapshot of before and after business object structure values is taken and serialized into a feed event payload. Such information can subsequently be used for further asynchronous feed processing. The business object Feed Event has an object category of Technical Object and a technical category of Standard Business Object.

A Root Node can represent an event or user input for which users are notified via a Feed. The elements located directly at the node Feed Event are defined by the data type FeedEventElements. These elements include: UUID, SystemAdministrativeData, SourceObjectName, SourceObjectTypeName, SourceChangeContextXMLEncodedText, SourceObjectID, SourceObjectAddDeleteNodesXMLEncodedText, SourceObjectHasChildrenIndicator, SourceParentObjectID, and ChildrenCounterValue. UUID may be an alternative key, is a globally unique identifier for a Feed Event, and may be based on datatype GDT: UUID. SystemAdministrativeData includes administrative data that is stored in a system. This data can include system users and change dates/times and may be based on datatype GDT: SystemAdministrativeData. SourceObjectName may be optional, is a name of an object from which a feed event is derived, and may be based on datatype GDT: LANGUAGEINDEPENDENT_Name. SourceObjectTypeName may be optional, is a type name of an object from which a feed event is derived, and may be based on datatype GDT: LANGUAGEINDEPENDENT_Name. SourceChangeContextXMLEncodedText may be optional, is an XML (eXtensible Markup Language)-encoded text describing changes that occurred at an object from which a feed event is derived. In some implementations, the encoded text includes before-after-image(s) of nodes and elements which were changed. SourceChangeContextXMLEncodedText may be based on datatype GDT: LANGUAGEINDEPENDENT_Name, with a qualifier of XMLEncoded. SourceObjectID may be optional, is a unique identifier of an object from which a feed event is derived, and may be based on datatypeGDT: FeedBOInst. SourceObjectAddDeleteNodesXMLEncodedText may be optional, and includes XML-encoded text describing nodes that were added and/or deleted at an object from which a feed event is derived. SourceObjectAddDeleteNodesXMLEncodedText may be based on datatype GDT: LANGUAGEINDEPENDENT_Name, with a qualifier of XMLEncoded. SourceObjectHasChildrenIndicator may be optional, is an indicator that specifies whether a source object has children, and may be based on datatype GDT: Indicator, with a qualifier of HasChildren. SourceParentObjectID may be optional, is a feed event which is regarded as a parent of a current feed event, and may be based on datatype GDT: FeedString. ChildrenCounterValue may be optional, is a number of feed events which are regarded as children of a current feed event, and may be based on datatype GDT: CounterValue, with a qualifier of Children.

A CreationIdentity inbound association relationship may exist from the business object Identity/node Identity, with a cardinality of 1:CN, which represents an identity that created a feed event. A SelectAll query may be used to return the node IDs of all instances of the Root or some other node. The SelectAll query can be used to enable the initial load of data for a Fast Search Infrastructure (FSI). A Query by Elements query can be used to return a list of feed events according to specified selection elements. The elements are defined by the data type FeedEventElements. These elements include: UUID, SystemAdministrativeData, SourceObjectName, SourceObjectTypeName, SourceChangeContextXMLEncodedText, SourceObjectID, SourceObjectAddDeleteNodesXMLEncodedText, SourceObjectHasChildrenIndicator, SourceParentObjectID, and ChildrenCounterValue. UUID is a globally unique identifier for a Feed Event, and may be based on datatype GDT: UUID. SystemAdministrativeData includes administrative data that is stored in a system. This data can include system users and change dates/times and may be based on datatype GDT: SystemAdministrativeData. SourceObjectName is a name of an object from which a feed event is derived, and may be based on datatype GDT: LANGUAGEINDEPENDENT_Name. SourceObjectTypeName is a type name of an object from which a feed event is derived, and may be based on datatype GDT: LANGUAGEINDEPENDENT_Name. SourceChangeContextXMLEncodedText includes XML-encoded text describing changes that occurred at an object from which a feed event is derived. In some implementations, the encoded text can include before-after-image(s) of the nodes and elements which were changed. SourceChangeContextXMLEncodedText may be based on datatype GDT: LANGUAGEINDEPENDENT_Name, with a qualifier of XMLEncoded. SourceObjectID is a unique identifier of an object from which a feed event is derived, and may be based on datatype GDT: FeedBOInst. SourceObjectAddDeleteNodesXMLEncodedText is XML-encoded text describing nodes that were added and/or deleted at an object from which a feed event is derived, and may be based on datatype GDT: LANGUAGEINDEPENDENT_Name, with a qualifier of XMLEncoded. SourceObjectHasChildrenIndicator is an indicator that specifies whether a source object has children, and may be based on datatype GDT: Indicator, with a qualifier of HasChildren. SourceParentObjectID is a feed event which is regarded as a parent of a current feed event, and may be based on datatype GDT: FeedString. ChildrenCounterValue is a number of feed events which are regarded as children of a current feed event, and may be based on datatype GDT: CounterValue, with a qualifier of Children.

FIG. 33 illustrates an example object model for a Feed Event Document business object 33000. Specifically, the object model depicts interactions among various components of the Feed Event Document business object 33000, as well as external components that HI interact with the Feed Event Document business object 33000 (shown here as 33002 to 33008). The Feed Event Document business object 33000 includes one or more elements, such as a Feed Event Document entity 33010. In some implementations, the elements included in the Feed Event Document business object 33000 can be hierarchical. Some or all of the elements included in the Feed Event Document business object 33000 can correspond to packages and/or entities in one or more message data types.

The business object Feed Event Document is a language-dependent document describing an event or an input created directly by a user. The business object Feed Event Document belongs to the process component User Convenience Accessories. The business object Feed Event Document belongs to the deployment unit Foundation. In some implementations, if a user is assigned to a feed event subscription and a corresponding business event is triggered, the compilation rule of the feed event type is executed, and a feed text is generated and is written into a feed event document instance, which can then be referenced by receivers or feed recipients. The business object Feed Event Document has an object category of Technical Object and a technical category of Standard Business Object.

A Root Node can represent a language-dependent document describing an event or an input created by a user. The elements located at the node Feed Event Document are defined by the data type FeedEventDocumentElements. These elements include: UUID, FeedEventUUID, FeedEventTypeCode, Text, AdditionalText, and LanguageCode. UUID may be an alternative key, is a globally unique identifier for a Feed Event Document, and may be based on datatype GDT: UUID. FeedEventUUID is a globally unique identifier for a Feed Event upon which a current Feed Event Document is based, and may be based on datatype GDT: UUID. FeedEventTypeCode is a coded representation of a type of feed event which determines one or more characteristics of a current document, and may be based on datatype GDT: FeedEventTypeCode. Text may be optional, is a textual description of a feed event, and may be based on datatype GDT: LANGUAGEINDEPENDENT_Text. AdditionalText may be optional, is an additional textual description of a feed event, and may be based on datatype GDT: LANGUAGEINDEPENDENT_Text. LanguageCode may be optional, is a coded representation of the language of a current document, and may be based on datatype GDT: LanguageCode.

A FeedEventType inbound aggregation relationship may exist from the business object Feed Event Type/node Feed Event Type, with a cardinality of 1:CN, which represents a feed event type which determines one or more characteristics of a current document. A FeedEvent inbound aggregation relationship may exist from the business object Feed Event/node Feed Event, with a cardinality of 1:CN, which represents a feed event which is described by a current document.

A SelectAll query can be used to return the node IDs of all instances of a Root or some other node. The SelectAll query is used to enable an initial load of data for a Fast Search Infrastructure (FSI). A Query By Elements query can be used to return a list of feed event documents according to specified selection elements. These elements are defined by the data type FeedEventDocumentElements. These elements include: UUID, FeedEventUUID, FeedEventTypeCode, Text, AdditionalText, and LanguageCode. UUID is a globally unique identifier for a Feed Event Document, and may be based on datatype GDT: UUID. FeedEventUUID is a globally unique identifier for a Feed Event upon which a current Feed Event Document is based, and may be based on datatype GDT: UUID. FeedEventTypeCode is a coded representation of a type of feed event which determines one or more characteristics of a current document, and may be based on datatype GDT: FeedEventTypeCode. Text is a textual description of a feed event, and may be based on datatype GDT: LANGUAGEINDEPENDENT_Text. AdditionalText is an additional textual description of a feed event, and may be based on datatype GDT: LANGUAGEINDEPENDENT_Text. LanguageCode is a coded representation of the language of a current document, and may be based on datatype GDT: LanguageCode.

FIG. 34 illustrates an example object model for a Feed Event Type business object 34000. Specifically, the object model depicts interactions among various components of the Feed Event Type business object 34000, as well as external components that interact with the Feed Event Type business object 34000 (shown here as 34002 and 34010). The Feed Event Type business object 34000 includes elements 34004 through 34008. The elements 34004 through 34008 can be hierarchical, as depicted. For example, the Feed Event Type entity 34004 hierarchically includes entities Relevant Element 34006 and Documentation 34008. Some or all of the entities 34006 through 34008 can correspond to packages and/or entities in one or more message data types.

The business object Feed Event Type is a type of event for which users are notified by a Feed. The business object Feed Event Type belongs to the process component User Convenience Accessories. The business object Feed Event Type belongs to the deployment unit Foundation. The Feed Event Type can specify how feed documents are generated for feed events. The business object Feed Event Type can include predefined subscription metadata with attribute sets. In some implementations, a user is assigned e.g., subscribed to a particular feed event type that is associated with a particular feed event. Whenever a feed event is triggered, an attribute set and compilation program defined for the Feed Event Type can be used to determine corresponding text that is written to a feed event document. The Feed Event Type can specify: a context from which feed events are generated; a compilation rule for feed events; one or more rules for the subscription of users; and a set of business object node elements which are relevant for a feed event. The business object Feed Event Type has an object category of Business Configuration Object and a technical category of Pre Deliverable Object.

A Root Node represents a type of event for which users are notified by a Feed. The elements located directly at the node Feed Event Type are defined by the data type FeedEventTypeElements. These elements include: Code, ContextTypeText, CompilationRuleName, SubscriptionAutomaticIndicator, SubscriptionDefaultIndicator, AdditionalContextTypeText, and UsageContextThingTypeName. Code may be an alternative key, is a coded representation of the type of event for which users are notified by a Feed, and may be based on datatype GDT: FeedEventTypeCode. ContextTypeText is a textual representation of the type of context from which a feed event is derived, and may be based on datatype GDT: FeedEventTypeBOType. ContextTypeText can refer to a business object type or to a Feed status. CompilationRuleName may be optional, is a unique name of a compilation rule which can be used to generate feeds for a type of feed event, and may be based on datatype GDT: LANGUAGEINDEPENDENT_EXTENDED_Text. SubscriptionAutomaticIndicator may be optional, is an indicator that specifies whether or not a subscription of users to a current feed event type occurs automatically. In some implementations, if the indicator is true then users might not explicitly select or deselect the feed event type. SubscriptionAutomaticIndicator may be based on datatype GDT: Indicator, with a qualifier of Automatic. SubscriptionDefaultIndicator may be optional and may be based on datatype GDT: Indicator, with a qualifier of Default. AdditionalContextTypeText may be optional, is an additional type of context from which a feed event is derived, and may be based on datatype GDT: LANGUAGEINDEPENDENT_EXTENDED_Text. UsageContextThingTypeName may be optional, is a type name of a user interface component Thing Type which describes a context for a usage of a business object to which a feed event type is related. UsageContextThingTypeName may be based on datatype GDT: LANGUAGEINDEPENDENT_EXTENDED_Text.

The following composition relationships to subordinate nodes may exist: Relevant Element, with a cardinality of 1:CN; and Documentation, with a cardinality of 1:CN, which may be a text composition. The following enterprise service infrastructure actions may exist: Reset Finetuning, Notify Deployment, Check, and CreateWithReference.

A Select All query may be used to return the node IDs of all instances of a root or some other node, and may be used to enable the initial load of data for a Fast Search Infrastructure (FSI). A Query by Elements query may be used to return a list of all feed event types according to specified selection elements. The query elements are defined by the data type FeedEventTypeElementsQueryElements. These elements include: Code, LanguageCode, Name, ContextTypeText, SubscriptionAutomaticIndicator, SubscriptionDefaultIndicator, and AdditionalContextTypeText. Code is a coded representation of the type of event for which users are notified by a Feed, and may be based on datatype GDT: FeedEventTypeCode. LanguageCode may be based on datatype GDT: LanguageCode. Name may be based on datatype GDT: EXTENDED_Name. ContextTypeText is a textual representation of a type of context from which a feed event is derive, can refer to a business object type or to a Feed status, and may be based on datatype GDT: FeedEventTypeBOType. SubscriptionAutomaticIndicator is an indicator that specifies whether or not a subscription of users to a current feed event type occurs automatically. In some implementations, if the indicator is true then users might not explicitly select or deselect the feed event type. SubscriptionAutomaticIndicator may be based on datatype GDT: Indicator, with a qualifier of Automatic. SubscriptionDefaultIndicator may be based on datatype GDT: Indicator, with a qualifier of Default. AdditionalContextTypeText is a textual representation of an additional type of context from which a feed event is derived, and may be based on datatype GDT: LANGUAGEINDEPENDENT_EXTENDED_Text.

Relevant Element is an element of a business object node which is relevant for a Feed Event Type. When a change occurs at this element then a feed event is generated. The elements located directly at the node Relevant Element are defined by the data type FeedEventTypeAttributeSetElements. These elements include: FeedEventTypeCode, BusinessObjectNodeElementName, BusinessObjectNodeElementPathName, and Key. FeedEventTypeCode is a coded representation of a type of event for which users are notified by a feed, and may be based on datatype GDT: FeedEventTypecode. BusinessObjectNodeElementName is a name of an element from a business object node which is relevant for a feed event type, and may be based on datatype GDT: LANGUAGEINDEPENDENT_EXTENDED_Text. BusinessObjectNodeElementPathName may be optional, is a path of an element within a business object node hierarchy, and may be based on datatype GDT: LANGUAGEINDEPENDENT_EXTENDED_Text. Key may be an alternative key, is a unique key of a Feed Event Type Relevant Element, and may be based on datatype KDT: FeedEventTypeIDAttributeKey.

A FeedEventType inbound association relationship may exist from the business object Feed Event Type/node Feed Event Type, with a cardinality of 1:CN. The following specialization associations for navigation may exist to the node Feed Event Type: Parent, with a target cardinality of 1; and Root, with a target cardinality of 1. The following enterprise service infrastructure actions may exist: CreateWithReference, and Reset Finetuning.

A Select All query may be used to return the node IDs of all instances of the root or some other node, and may be used to enable the initial load of data for a Fast Search Infrastructure. A Query by Elements query may be used to return a list of all feed event type attribute sets according to specified selection elements. The query elements are defined by the data type FeedEventTypeAttributeSetElementsQuery. These elements include: FeedEventTypeCode, BusinessObjectNodeElementName, and BusinessObjectNodeElementPathName. FeedEventTypeCode is a coded representation of a type of event for which users are notified by a feed, and may be based on datatype GDT: FeedEventTypeCode. BusinessObjectNodeElementName is a name of an element from a business object node which is relevant for a feed event type, and may be based on datatype GDT: LANGUAGEINDEPENDENT_EXTENDED_Text. BusinessObjectNodeElementPathName is a path of an element within a business object node hierarchy, and may be based on datatype GDT: LANGUAGEINDEPENDENT_EXTENDED_Text.

The Documentation text node includes elements. The elements located directly at the node Documentation are defined by the data type FeedEventTypeDocumentationElements. These elements include: LanguageCode, FeedEventTypCode, Name, and Key. LanguageCode is a coded representation of a language of a document, and may be based on datatype GDT: LanguageCode. FeedEventTypCode is a coded representation of a type of event for which users are notified by a Feed, and may be based on datatype GDT: FeedEventTypeCode. Name may be optional, is a unique key of a Feed Event Type Documentation, and may be based on datatype GDT: EXTENDED_Name. Key may be an alternative key, is a unique key of a Feed Event Type Document, and may be based on datatype KDT: FeedEventTypeDocumentationKey.

A FeedEventType inbound association relationship may exist from the business object Feed Event Type/node Feed Event Type, with a cardinality of 1:CN. A UserInterfaceLanguage inbound association relationship may exist from the business object User Interface and Translation Language/node User Interface Language, with a cardinality of 1:CN, which represents the language of a document. The following specialization associations for navigation may exist to the node Feed Event Type: Parent, with a target cardinality of 1; and Root, with a target cardinality of 1.

A Select All query may be used to return the node IDs of all instances of the root or some other node, and may be used to enable an initial load of data for a Fast Search Infrastructure. A Query by Elements query may be used to return a list of all feed event type documentations according to specified selection elements. The query elements are defined by the data type FeedEventTypeDocumentationElementsQueryElements. These elements include: LanguageCode, FeedEventTypeCode, and Name. LanguageCode is a coded representation of the language of this documentation, and may be based on datatype GDT: LanguageCode. FeedEventTypeCode is a coded representation of the type of event for which users are notified by a Feed, and may be based on datatype GDT: FeedEventTypeCode. Name is a Name of an event type code, and may be based on datatype GDT: EXTENDED_Name.

A number of implementations have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. Accordingly, other implementations are within the scope of the following claims.

Claims

1. A non-transitory computer readable medium including program code for providing a message-based interface for exchanging information about events and user input for which users are notified in a feed system, the medium comprising: program code for receiving a first message via a message-based interface derived from a common business object model, where the common business object model includes business objects having relationships that enable derivation of message-based interfaces and message packages, the message-based interface exposing at least one service as defined in a service registry, the first message received from a heterogeneous application executing in an environment of computer systems providing message-based services, the first message for querying information about feed events according to specified selection elements, the first message including a first message package derived from the common business object model, the first message package hierarchically organized in memory based on the common business object model, the first message package including: at a first hierarchical level in the first message package, a feed event query message entity; andat the first hierarchical level in the first message package, a feed event package comprising, at a second hierarchical level in the first message package, a feed event entity, where the feed event entity includes, at a third hierarchical level in the first message package, a universally unique identifier (UUID), system administrative data, and at least one creation identity entity;program code for processing the first message according to the hierarchical organization of the first message package, where processing the first message includes unpacking the first message package based on the first message package's structure and the first message package's derivation from the common business object model, wherein the particular structure of the first message package is used at least in part to identify the purpose of the first message; andprogram code for sending a second message to the heterogeneous application responsive to the first message, where the second message includes a second message package derived from the common business object model to provide consistent semantics with the first message package.
2. The computer readable medium of claim 1, wherein the feed event entity further includes at least one of the following: a source object name, a source object type name, source change context eXtensible Markup Language (XML) encoded text, a source object identifier (ID), source object add/delete nodes XML encoded text, a source object has children indicator, a source parent object ID, and a children counter value.
3. A distributed system operating in a landscape of computer systems providing message-based services defined in a service registry, the system comprising: at least one processor operable to execute computer readable instructions embodied on non-transitory media;a graphical user interface executable by the at least one processor and comprising computer readable instructions, embedded on non-transitory media, for querying information about feed events according to specified selection elements using a request;a first memory storing a user interface controller executable by the at least one processor for processing the request and involving a message including a first message package derived from a common business object model, where the common business object model includes business objects having relationships that enable derivation of message-based service interfaces and message packages, the first message package hierarchically organized based on the common business object model, the hierarchical organization of the first message package including: at a first hierarchical level in the first message package, a feed event query message entity; andat the first hierarchical level in the first message package, a feed event package comprising, at a second hierarchical level in the first message package, a feed event entity, where the feed event entity includes, at a third hierarchical level in the first message package, a universally unique identifier (UUID), system administrative data, and at least one creation identity entity; anda second memory, remote from the graphical user interface, storing a plurality of service interfaces executable by the at least one processor and derived from the common business object model to provide consistent semantics with messages derived from the common business object model, where one of the service interfaces is operable to process the message via the service interface according to the hierarchical organization of the first message package, where processing the message includes unpacking the first message package based on the first message package's structure and the first message package's derivation from the common business object model, wherein the particular structure of the first message package is used at least in part to identify the purpose of the message.
4. The distributed system of claim 3, wherein the first memory is remote from the graphical user interface.
5. The distributed system of claim 3, wherein the first memory is remote from the second memory.
6. A non-transitory computer readable medium including program code for providing a message-based interface for exchanging a language-dependent document describing an event or an input created directly by a user, the medium comprising: program code for receiving a first message via a message-based interface derived from a common business object model, where the common business object model includes business objects having relationships that enable derivation of message-based interfaces and message packages, the message-based interface exposing at least one service as defined in a service registry, the first message received from a heterogeneous application executing in an environment of computer systems providing message-based services, the first message for querying feed event documents according to specified selection elements, the first message including a first message package derived from the common business object model, the first message package hierarchically organized in memory based on the common business object model, the first message package including: at a first hierarchical level in the first message package, a feed event document query message entity; andat the first hierarchical level in the first message package, a feed event document package comprising, at a second hierarchical level in the first message package, a feed event document entity, where the feed event document entity includes, at a third hierarchical level in the first message package, a universally unique identifier (UUID), a feed event UUID, a feed event type code, at least one feed event type entity, and at least one feed event entity;program code for processing the first message according to the hierarchical organization of the first message package, where processing the first message includes unpacking the first message package based on the first message package's structure and the first message package's derivation from the common business object model, wherein the particular structure of the first message package is used at least in part to identify the purpose of the first message; andprogram code for sending a second message to the heterogeneous application responsive to the first message, where the second message includes a second message package derived from the common business object model to provide consistent semantics with the first message package.
7. The computer readable medium of claim 6, wherein the feed event document entity further includes at least one of the following: a textual description of the feed event, additional text and a language code.
8. A distributed system operating in a landscape of computer systems providing message-based services defined in a service registry, the system comprising: at least one processor operable to execute computer readable instructions embodied on non-transitory media;a graphical user interface executable by the at least one processor and comprising computer readable instructions, embedded on non-transitory media, for querying feed event documents according to specified selection elements using a request;a first memory storing a user interface controller executable by the at least one processor for processing the request and involving a message including a first message package derived from a common business object model, where the common business object model includes business objects having relationships that enable derivation of message-based service interfaces and message packages, the first message package hierarchically organized based on the common business object model, the hierarchical organization of the first message package including: at a first hierarchical level in the first message package, a feed event document query message entity; andat the first hierarchical level in the first message package, a feed event document package comprising, at a second hierarchical level in the first message package, a feed event document entity, where the feed event document entity includes, at a third hierarchical level in the first message package, a universally unique identifier (UUID), a feed event UUID, a feed event type code, at least one feed event type entity, and at least one feed event entity; anda second memory, remote from the graphical user interface, storing a plurality of service interfaces executable by the at least one processor and derived from the common business object model to provide consistent semantics with messages derived from the common business object model, where one of the service interfaces is operable to process the message via the service interface according to the hierarchical organization of the first message package, where processing the message includes unpacking the first message package based on the first message package's structure and the first message package's derivation from the common business object model, wherein the particular structure of the first message package is used at least in part to identify the purpose of the message.
9. The distributed system of claim 8, wherein the first memory is remote from the graphical user interface.
10. The distributed system of claim 8, wherein the first memory is remote from the second memory.
11. A non-transitory computer readable medium including program code for providing a message-based interface for exchanging information about types of events for which users are notified by a feed, the medium comprising: program code for receiving a first message via a message-based interface derived from a common business object model, where the common business object model includes business objects having relationships that enable derivation of message-based interfaces and message packages, the message-based interface exposing at least one service as defined in a service registry, the first message received from a heterogeneous application executing in an environment of computer systems providing message-based services, the first message for querying information about feed event types according to specified selection elements, the first message including a first message package derived from the common business object model, the first message package hierarchically organized in memory based on the common business object model, the first message package including: at a first hierarchical level in the first message package, a feed event type query message entity; andat the first hierarchical level in the first message package, a feed event type package comprising, at a second hierarchical level in the first message package, a feed event type entity, where the feed event type entity includes, at a third hierarchical level in the first message package, a code and content type text, at least one relevant element entity and at least one documentation entity; andprogram code for sending a second message to the heterogeneous application responsive to the first message, where the second message includes a second message package derived from the common business object model to provide consistent semantics with the first message package.
12. The computer readable medium of claim 11, wherein the feed event type entity further includes at least one of the following: a compilation rule name, a subscription automatic indicator, a subscription default indicator, additional context type text, and a usage context type name.
13. A distributed system operating in a landscape of computer systems providing message-based services defined in a service registry, the system comprising: at least one processor operable to execute computer readable instructions embodied on non-transitory media;a graphical user interface executable by the at least one processor and comprising computer readable instructions, embedded on non-transitory media, for querying information about feed event types according to specified selection elements using a request;a first memory storing a user interface controller executable by the at least one processor for processing the request and involving a message including a first message package derived from a common business object model, where the common business object model includes business objects having relationships that enable derivation of message-based service interfaces and message packages, the first message package hierarchically organized based on the common business object model, the hierarchical organization of the first message package including: at a first hierarchical level in the first message package, a feed event type query message entity; andat the first hierarchical level in the first message package, a feed event type package comprising, at a second hierarchical level in the first message package, a feed event type entity, where the feed event type entity includes, at a third hierarchical level in the first message package, a code and content type text, at least one relevant element entity, and at least one documentation entity; anda second memory, remote from the graphical user interface, storing a plurality of service interfaces executable by the at least one processor and derived from the common business object model to provide consistent semantics with messages derived from the common business object model, where one of the service interfaces is operable to process the message via the service interface according to the hierarchical organization of the first message package, where processing the message includes unpacking the first message package based on the first message package's structure and the first message package's derivation from the common business object model, wherein the particular structure of the first message package is used at least in part to identify the purpose of the message.
14. The distributed system of claim 13, wherein the first memory is remote from the graphical user interface.
15. The distributed system of claim 13, wherein the first memory is remote from the second memory.

US Referenced Citations (455)

Number	Name	Date	Kind
3223321	Baumgartner	Dec 1965	A
5126936	Champion et al.	Jun 1992	A
5210686	Jernigan	May 1993	A
5247575	Sprague et al.	Sep 1993	A
5255181	Chapman et al.	Oct 1993	A
5321605	Chapman et al.	Jun 1994	A
5463555	Ward et al.	Oct 1995	A
5627764	Schutzman et al.	May 1997	A
5717925	Harper et al.	Feb 1998	A
5787237	Reilly	Jul 1998	A
5812987	Luskin et al.	Sep 1998	A
5953688	Su et al.	Sep 1999	A
5966695	Melchione et al.	Oct 1999	A
5970465	Dietrich et al.	Oct 1999	A
5970475	Barnes et al.	Oct 1999	A
5983284	Argade	Nov 1999	A
6044134	De La Huerga	Mar 2000	A
6047264	Fisher et al.	Apr 2000	A
6052525	Carlson et al.	Apr 2000	A
6058378	Clark et al.	May 2000	A
6073137	Brown et al.	Jun 2000	A
6092196	Reiche	Jul 2000	A
6104393	Santos-Gomez	Aug 2000	A
6115690	Wong	Sep 2000	A
6125391	Meltzer et al.	Sep 2000	A
6138118	Koppstein et al.	Oct 2000	A
6154732	Tarbox	Nov 2000	A
6222533	Notani et al.	Apr 2001	B1
6226675	Meltzer et al.	May 2001	B1
6229551	Huang	May 2001	B1
6275977	Nagai et al.	Aug 2001	B1
6295548	Klein et al.	Sep 2001	B1
6308163	Du et al.	Oct 2001	B1
6311165	Coutts et al.	Oct 2001	B1
6327700	Chen et al.	Dec 2001	B1
6331972	Harris et al.	Dec 2001	B1
6332163	Bowman-Amuah	Dec 2001	B1
6374252	Althoff et al.	Apr 2002	B1
6375252	Cheron et al.	Apr 2002	B1
6401101	Britton et al.	Jun 2002	B1
6424979	Livingston et al.	Jul 2002	B1
6434159	Woodward et al.	Aug 2002	B1
6438594	Bowman-Amuah	Aug 2002	B1
6442620	Thatte et al.	Aug 2002	B1
6446136	Pohlmann et al.	Sep 2002	B1
6457041	Hutchison	Sep 2002	B1
6496825	Klein et al.	Dec 2002	B1
6513019	Lewis	Jan 2003	B2
6523027	Underwood	Feb 2003	B1
6542912	Meltzer et al.	Apr 2003	B2
6591260	Schwarzhoff et al.	Jul 2003	B1
6643660	Miller et al.	Nov 2003	B1
6725122	Mori et al.	Apr 2004	B2
6738747	Tanaka et al.	May 2004	B1
6745229	Gobin et al.	Jun 2004	B1
6763353	Li et al.	Jul 2004	B2
6775647	Evans et al.	Aug 2004	B1
6826443	Makinen	Nov 2004	B2
6868370	Burbridge et al.	Mar 2005	B1
6937992	Benda et al.	Aug 2005	B1
6957230	Cameron et al.	Oct 2005	B2
6970844	Bierenbaum	Nov 2005	B1
6981222	Rush et al.	Dec 2005	B2
7010517	Bird et al.	Mar 2006	B2
7020594	Chacon	Mar 2006	B1
7039606	Hoffman et al.	May 2006	B2
7055132	Bogdan et al.	May 2006	B2
7069278	Telkowski et al.	Jun 2006	B2
7076449	Tsunenari et al.	Jul 2006	B2
7131069	Rush et al.	Oct 2006	B1
7206768	deGroeve et al.	Apr 2007	B1
7249157	Stewart et al.	Jul 2007	B2
7249195	Panec et al.	Jul 2007	B2
7269569	Spira et al.	Sep 2007	B2
7292965	Mehta et al.	Nov 2007	B1
7308440	Rajarajan et al.	Dec 2007	B2
7321864	Gendler	Jan 2008	B1
7340410	Vaillancourt et al.	Mar 2008	B1
7363271	Morimoto	Apr 2008	B2
7379931	Morinville	May 2008	B2
7383990	Veit	Jun 2008	B2
7406358	Preiss	Jul 2008	B2
7426520	Gorelik et al.	Sep 2008	B2
7451177	Johnson et al.	Nov 2008	B1
7454362	Hayes et al.	Nov 2008	B1
7481367	Fees et al.	Jan 2009	B2
7509278	Jones	Mar 2009	B2
7515697	Eng et al.	Apr 2009	B2
7516088	Johnson et al.	Apr 2009	B2
7523466	DeAngelis	Apr 2009	B2
7536697	Wiseman et al.	May 2009	B2
7559066	Ho et al.	Jul 2009	B2
7574383	Parasnis et al.	Aug 2009	B1
7580948	Sedky et al.	Aug 2009	B2
7617128	Greak	Nov 2009	B2
7617328	Lewis et al.	Nov 2009	B2
7627504	Brady et al.	Dec 2009	B2
7634482	Mukherjee et al.	Dec 2009	B2
7641110	Hursta et al.	Jan 2010	B2
7657466	Klingenberg et al.	Feb 2010	B2
7657575	Eberlein et al.	Feb 2010	B2
7689711	Brouk et al.	Mar 2010	B2
7711680	Barnes-Leon et al.	May 2010	B2
7761428	Herbst et al.	Jul 2010	B2
7788319	Schmidt et al.	Aug 2010	B2
7797204	Balent	Sep 2010	B2
7805383	Veit et al.	Sep 2010	B2
7813949	Grendel et al.	Oct 2010	B2
7853491	Wittmer et al.	Dec 2010	B2
7865426	Volpert	Jan 2011	B2
7873965	Hayton et al.	Jan 2011	B2
7895209	Spence et al.	Feb 2011	B2
7941236	Spearman	May 2011	B2
7962385	Falk et al.	Jun 2011	B2
8010376	Buchmann et al.	Aug 2011	B2
8082243	Gorelik et al.	Dec 2011	B2
8104681	Eisenson	Jan 2012	B2
8127035	Hood et al.	Feb 2012	B1
8150798	Ma et al.	Apr 2012	B2
8185430	Edwards et al.	May 2012	B2
8219444	Züerl et al.	Jul 2012	B2
8234375	Ghadialy et al.	Jul 2012	B2
8326795	Markovic	Dec 2012	B2
RE43905	Bierenbaum	Jan 2013	E
8370272	Wickel et al.	Feb 2013	B2
8396749	Koegler et al.	Mar 2013	B2
8396751	Becker et al.	Mar 2013	B2
8396768	Kaisermayr et al.	Mar 2013	B1
8401172	Duva et al.	Mar 2013	B1
8417593	Schmitt et al.	Apr 2013	B2
8423428	Grendel et al.	Apr 2013	B2
8433585	Sr et al.	Apr 2013	B2
8463666	Dorais et al.	Jun 2013	B2
8473317	Santoso et al.	Jun 2013	B2
8583680	Hoang	Nov 2013	B2
8589263	Doenig et al.	Nov 2013	B2
8666857	Roscoe et al.	Mar 2014	B2
8850454	Boullery et al.	Sep 2014	B2
20010042032	Crawshaw et al.	Nov 2001	A1
20010047372	Gorelik et al.	Nov 2001	A1
20020013721	Dabbiere et al.	Jan 2002	A1
20020026394	Savage et al.	Feb 2002	A1
20020046053	Hare et al.	Apr 2002	A1
20020052754	Joyce et al.	May 2002	A1
20020054170	Rush et al.	May 2002	A1
20020065680	Kojima et al.	May 2002	A1
20020072988	Aram	Jun 2002	A1
20020087481	Harif	Jul 2002	A1
20020087483	Harif	Jul 2002	A1
20020099634	Coutts et al.	Jul 2002	A1
20020107765	Walker	Aug 2002	A1
20020112171	Ginter et al.	Aug 2002	A1
20020138318	Ellis et al.	Sep 2002	A1
20020147668	Smith et al.	Oct 2002	A1
20020152104	Ojha et al.	Oct 2002	A1
20020152145	Wanta et al.	Oct 2002	A1
20020156693	Stewart et al.	Oct 2002	A1
20020156930	Velasquez	Oct 2002	A1
20020157017	Mi et al.	Oct 2002	A1
20020165872	Meltzer et al.	Nov 2002	A1
20020169657	Singh et al.	Nov 2002	A1
20020184070	Chen et al.	Dec 2002	A1
20020184147	Boulger	Dec 2002	A1
20020186876	Jones et al.	Dec 2002	A1
20020194045	Shay et al.	Dec 2002	A1
20030004799	Kish	Jan 2003	A1
20030028451	Ananian	Feb 2003	A1
20030041178	Brouk et al.	Feb 2003	A1
20030046639	Fai et al.	Mar 2003	A1
20030069648	Douglas et al.	Apr 2003	A1
20030083910	Sayal et al.	May 2003	A1
20030083955	Ookura	May 2003	A1
20030084428	Agostini et al.	May 2003	A1
20030086594	Gross	May 2003	A1
20030097287	Franz et al.	May 2003	A1
20030120502	Robb et al.	Jun 2003	A1
20030120665	Fox et al.	Jun 2003	A1
20030126077	Kantor et al.	Jul 2003	A1
20030167193	Jones et al.	Sep 2003	A1
20030171962	Hirth et al.	Sep 2003	A1
20030172007	Helmolt et al.	Sep 2003	A1
20030172135	Bobick et al.	Sep 2003	A1
20030172343	Leymaster et al.	Sep 2003	A1
20030177139	Cameron et al.	Sep 2003	A1
20030195815	Li et al.	Oct 2003	A1
20030204452	Wheeler	Oct 2003	A1
20030204637	Chong	Oct 2003	A1
20030208389	Kurihara et al.	Nov 2003	A1
20030212614	Chu et al.	Nov 2003	A1
20030216978	Sweeney et al.	Nov 2003	A1
20030220835	Barnes, Jr.	Nov 2003	A1
20030220875	Lam et al.	Nov 2003	A1
20030229522	Thompson et al.	Dec 2003	A1
20030229550	DiPrima et al.	Dec 2003	A1
20030233295	Tozawa et al.	Dec 2003	A1
20030236748	Gressel et al.	Dec 2003	A1
20040002883	Andrews et al.	Jan 2004	A1
20040006653	Kamen et al.	Jan 2004	A1
20040015366	Wiseman et al.	Jan 2004	A1
20040024662	Gray et al.	Feb 2004	A1
20040024862	Wall et al.	Feb 2004	A1
20040034577	Van Hoose et al.	Feb 2004	A1
20040039665	Ouchi	Feb 2004	A1
20040073510	Logan	Apr 2004	A1
20040083201	Sholl et al.	Apr 2004	A1
20040083233	Willoughby	Apr 2004	A1
20040122730	Tucciarone et al.	Jun 2004	A1
20040133445	Rajan et al.	Jul 2004	A1
20040138942	Pearson et al.	Jul 2004	A1
20040148227	Tabuchi et al.	Jul 2004	A1
20040167894	Ziv	Aug 2004	A1
20040172360	Mabrey et al.	Sep 2004	A1
20040186891	Panec et al.	Sep 2004	A1
20040187140	Aigner et al.	Sep 2004	A1
20040220910	Zang et al.	Nov 2004	A1
20040236660	Thomas et al.	Nov 2004	A1
20040254945	Schmidt et al.	Dec 2004	A1
20040267597	Kobrosly et al.	Dec 2004	A1
20040267714	Frid et al.	Dec 2004	A1
20050005190	Ofir et al.	Jan 2005	A1
20050015273	Iyer	Jan 2005	A1
20050021366	Pool et al.	Jan 2005	A1
20050033588	Ruiz et al.	Feb 2005	A1
20050038718	Barnes et al.	Feb 2005	A1
20050038744	Viijoen	Feb 2005	A1
20050049903	Raja	Mar 2005	A1
20050055369	Gorelik et al.	Mar 2005	A1
20050065987	Telkowski et al.	Mar 2005	A1
20050066240	Sykes et al.	Mar 2005	A1
20050071262	Kobeh et al.	Mar 2005	A1
20050080640	Bhaskaran et al.	Apr 2005	A1
20050102250	Carr et al.	May 2005	A1
20050108085	Dakar et al.	May 2005	A1
20050108168	Halpin et al.	May 2005	A1
20050108276	Sriram	May 2005	A1
20050131947	Laub et al.	Jun 2005	A1
20050149539	Cameron et al.	Jul 2005	A1
20050159997	John	Jul 2005	A1
20050171833	Jost et al.	Aug 2005	A1
20050182639	Dale	Aug 2005	A1
20050187797	Johnson	Aug 2005	A1
20050187866	Lee	Aug 2005	A1
20050194431	Fees et al.	Sep 2005	A1
20050194439	Zuerl et al.	Sep 2005	A1
20050197849	Fotteler et al.	Sep 2005	A1
20050197851	Veit	Sep 2005	A1
20050197878	Fotteler et al.	Sep 2005	A1
20050197881	Fotteler et al.	Sep 2005	A1
20050197882	Fotteler et al.	Sep 2005	A1
20050197886	Veit	Sep 2005	A1
20050197887	Zuerl et al.	Sep 2005	A1
20050197896	Veit et al.	Sep 2005	A1
20050197897	Veit et al.	Sep 2005	A1
20050197898	Veit et al.	Sep 2005	A1
20050197899	Veit et al.	Sep 2005	A1
20050197900	Veit	Sep 2005	A1
20050197901	Veit et al.	Sep 2005	A1
20050197902	Veit	Sep 2005	A1
20050197913	Grendel et al.	Sep 2005	A1
20050197928	Fotteler et al.	Sep 2005	A1
20050197941	Veit	Sep 2005	A1
20050209732	Audimoolam et al.	Sep 2005	A1
20050210406	Biwer et al.	Sep 2005	A1
20050216321	Veit	Sep 2005	A1
20050216359	Welter et al.	Sep 2005	A1
20050216371	Fotteler et al.	Sep 2005	A1
20050216421	Barry et al.	Sep 2005	A1
20050222888	Hosoda et al.	Oct 2005	A1
20050222896	Rhyne et al.	Oct 2005	A1
20050222945	Pannicke et al.	Oct 2005	A1
20050228821	Gold	Oct 2005	A1
20050234754	Veit	Oct 2005	A1
20050240488	Grendel et al.	Oct 2005	A1
20050246240	Padilla	Nov 2005	A1
20050256753	Veit et al.	Nov 2005	A1
20050278693	Brunell et al.	Dec 2005	A1
20060004934	Guldner et al.	Jan 2006	A1
20060005098	Lotz et al.	Jan 2006	A1
20060020515	Lee et al.	Jan 2006	A1
20060026552	Mazzitelli et al.	Feb 2006	A1
20060026586	Remmel et al.	Feb 2006	A1
20060036941	Neil	Feb 2006	A1
20060047574	Sundaram et al.	Mar 2006	A1
20060047598	Hansen	Mar 2006	A1
20060059005	Horn et al.	Mar 2006	A1
20060059059	Horn et al.	Mar 2006	A1
20060059060	Horn et al.	Mar 2006	A1
20060069598	Schweitzer et al.	Mar 2006	A1
20060069629	Schweitzer et al.	Mar 2006	A1
20060069632	Kahn et al.	Mar 2006	A1
20060074728	Schweitzer et al.	Apr 2006	A1
20060080338	Seubert et al.	Apr 2006	A1
20060085243	Cooper et al.	Apr 2006	A1
20060085336	Seubert et al.	Apr 2006	A1
20060085412	Johnson et al.	Apr 2006	A1
20060085450	Seubert et al.	Apr 2006	A1
20060089885	Finke et al.	Apr 2006	A1
20060095373	Venkatasubramanian et al.	May 2006	A1
20060106824	Stuhec	May 2006	A1
20060184435	Mostowfi	Aug 2006	A1
20060195563	Chapin et al.	Aug 2006	A1
20060212376	Snyder et al.	Sep 2006	A1
20060265259	Diana et al.	Nov 2006	A1
20060280302	Baumann et al.	Dec 2006	A1
20060282360	Kahn et al.	Dec 2006	A1
20070016601	Cameron et al.	Jan 2007	A1
20070027742	Emuchay et al.	Feb 2007	A1
20070027891	Schauerte et al.	Feb 2007	A1
20070043583	Davulcu et al.	Feb 2007	A1
20070055688	Blattner	Mar 2007	A1
20070061154	Markvoort et al.	Mar 2007	A1
20070067411	Angelov	Mar 2007	A1
20070067753	Pocklington et al.	Mar 2007	A1
20070078799	Huber-Buschbeck et al.	Apr 2007	A1
20070100491	Burrell et al.	May 2007	A1
20070112574	Greene	May 2007	A1
20070118391	Malaney et al.	May 2007	A1
20070124227	Dembo et al.	May 2007	A1
20070129978	Shirasu et al.	Jun 2007	A1
20070132585	Llorca et al.	Jun 2007	A1
20070150387	Seubert et al.	Jun 2007	A1
20070150836	Deggelmann et al.	Jun 2007	A1
20070156428	Brecht-Tillinger et al.	Jul 2007	A1
20070156545	Lin	Jul 2007	A1
20070156552	Manganiello	Jul 2007	A1
20070156690	Moser et al.	Jul 2007	A1
20070165622	O'Rourke et al.	Jul 2007	A1
20070174811	Kaetker et al.	Jul 2007	A1
20070208698	Brindley et al.	Sep 2007	A1
20070214065	Kahlon et al.	Sep 2007	A1
20070219864	Vollrath et al.	Sep 2007	A1
20070219941	Schnurr et al.	Sep 2007	A1
20070225949	Sundararajan et al.	Sep 2007	A1
20070226066	Brunner et al.	Sep 2007	A1
20070226090	Stratton	Sep 2007	A1
20070233574	Koegler et al.	Oct 2007	A1
20070255639	Seifert	Nov 2007	A1
20070265860	Herrmann et al.	Nov 2007	A1
20070265862	Freund et al.	Nov 2007	A1
20070288250	Lemcke et al.	Dec 2007	A1
20070294159	Cottle	Dec 2007	A1
20070295803	Levine et al.	Dec 2007	A1
20080005012	Deneef	Jan 2008	A1
20080016242	Panec et al.	Jan 2008	A1
20080021754	Horn et al.	Jan 2008	A1
20080027835	LeMasters et al.	Jan 2008	A1
20080027836	Chapin	Jan 2008	A1
20080040243	Chang et al.	Feb 2008	A1
20080046104	Van Camp et al.	Feb 2008	A1
20080046421	Bhatia et al.	Feb 2008	A1
20080065443	Gorur et al.	Mar 2008	A1
20080082422	Barrett	Apr 2008	A1
20080120129	Seubert et al.	May 2008	A1
20080120190	Joao et al.	May 2008	A1
20080120204	Conner et al.	May 2008	A1
20080120206	Weiler et al.	May 2008	A1
20080120313	O'Brien et al.	May 2008	A1
20080133303	Singh et al.	Jun 2008	A1
20080144791	Harifi et al.	Jun 2008	A1
20080154969	DeBie	Jun 2008	A1
20080162266	Griessmann et al.	Jul 2008	A1
20080184265	Kasi et al.	Jul 2008	A1
20080189360	Kiley et al.	Aug 2008	A1
20080196108	Dent et al.	Aug 2008	A1
20080208805	Wang et al.	Aug 2008	A1
20080215354	Halverson et al.	Sep 2008	A1
20080243578	Veit	Oct 2008	A1
20080250405	Farhangi et al.	Oct 2008	A1
20080263051	Kanyetzna et al.	Oct 2008	A1
20080288317	Kakar	Nov 2008	A1
20080300962	Cawston et al.	Dec 2008	A1
20080314981	Eisenson	Dec 2008	A1
20090006203	Fordyce et al.	Jan 2009	A1
20090063287	Tribout et al.	Mar 2009	A1
20090077074	Hosokawa	Mar 2009	A1
20090083088	Mathew et al.	Mar 2009	A1
20090089198	Kroutik	Apr 2009	A1
20090094274	Gorelik et al.	Apr 2009	A1
20090106133	Redmayne	Apr 2009	A1
20090144624	Barnes, Jr.	Jun 2009	A1
20090164497	Steinmaier et al.	Jun 2009	A1
20090171698	Suenderhauf et al.	Jul 2009	A1
20090171716	Suenderhauf et al.	Jul 2009	A1
20090192926	Tarapata	Jul 2009	A1
20090193432	McKegney et al.	Jul 2009	A1
20090199172	Zhong et al.	Aug 2009	A1
20090222360	Schmitt et al.	Sep 2009	A1
20090222749	Marinescu et al.	Sep 2009	A1
20090248429	Doenig et al.	Oct 2009	A1
20090248430	Hubert et al.	Oct 2009	A1
20090248431	Schoknecht et al.	Oct 2009	A1
20090248463	Piochon et al.	Oct 2009	A1
20090248473	Doenig et al.	Oct 2009	A1
20090248487	Santoso et al.	Oct 2009	A1
20090248547	Doenig et al.	Oct 2009	A1
20090248558	Hollberg et al.	Oct 2009	A1
20090248586	Kaisermayr et al.	Oct 2009	A1
20090248698	Rehmann	Oct 2009	A1
20090249358	Schuette	Oct 2009	A1
20090249362	Lindemann et al.	Oct 2009	A1
20090254971	Herz et al.	Oct 2009	A1
20090271245	Joshi et al.	Oct 2009	A1
20090276338	Masermann et al.	Nov 2009	A1
20090281865	Stoitsev	Nov 2009	A1
20090300544	Psenka et al.	Dec 2009	A1
20090300578	Neil	Dec 2009	A1
20090326988	Barth et al.	Dec 2009	A1
20090327009	Schmitt et al.	Dec 2009	A1
20090327105	Moussa et al.	Dec 2009	A1
20090327106	Bartelt et al.	Dec 2009	A1
20100001834	Brunswig et al.	Jan 2010	A1
20100014510	Boreli et al.	Jan 2010	A1
20100070391	Storr et al.	Mar 2010	A1
20100070395	Elkeles et al.	Mar 2010	A1
20100106555	Mneimneh et al.	Apr 2010	A1
20100131379	Dorais et al.	May 2010	A1
20100131394	Rutsch et al.	May 2010	A1
20100153240	Bold et al.	Jun 2010	A1
20100153297	Haaf et al.	Jun 2010	A1
20100161366	Clemens et al.	Jun 2010	A1
20100161425	Sideman	Jun 2010	A1
20100169888	Hare et al.	Jul 2010	A1
20100198631	Edwards et al.	Aug 2010	A1
20100217645	Jin et al.	Aug 2010	A1
20100217820	Brouk et al.	Aug 2010	A1
20100218245	Brouk et al.	Aug 2010	A1
20100241729	Angelov	Sep 2010	A1
20100306536	Brouk et al.	Dec 2010	A1
20110035323	Hamilton et al.	Feb 2011	A1
20110046775	Bailey et al.	Feb 2011	A1
20110077982	Roscoe et al.	Mar 2011	A1
20110077999	Becker et al.	Mar 2011	A1
20110078048	Becker et al.	Mar 2011	A1
20110088000	Mackay	Apr 2011	A1
20110153505	Brunswig et al.	Jun 2011	A1
20110153767	Coldicott et al.	Jun 2011	A1
20110196717	Colliat et al.	Aug 2011	A1
20110276360	Barth et al.	Nov 2011	A1
20110276636	Cheng et al.	Nov 2011	A1
20110307289	Hosur et al.	Dec 2011	A1
20110307295	Steiert et al.	Dec 2011	A1
20110307398	Reinhardt et al.	Dec 2011	A1
20110307409	Schiff et al.	Dec 2011	A1
20120089509	Kasriel et al.	Apr 2012	A1
20120117000	Haaf et al.	May 2012	A1
20120118983	Harris	May 2012	A1
20120166328	Spirgel	Jun 2012	A1
20120191604	Allin et al.	Jul 2012	A1
20120296919	Sinha et al.	Nov 2012	A1
20130021978	Tamura et al.	Jan 2013	A1
20130124232	Zhao et al.	May 2013	A1
20130144741	Becker et al.	Jun 2013	A1
20130159146	Schmitt et al.	Jun 2013	A1
20140058905	Kahn et al.	Feb 2014	A1
20140156763	Dubetz et al.	Jun 2014	A1

Foreign Referenced Citations (8)

Number	Date	Country
1501296	Jun 2004	CN
1609866	Apr 2005	CN
1632806	Jun 2005	CN
1765138	Apr 2006	CN
1767537	May 2006	CN
101174957	May 2008	CN
101288092	Oct 2008	CN
WO 2008005102	Jan 2008	WO

Non-Patent Literature Citations (442)

Entry
Altintas et al.; “Aurora Software Product Line”; Cybersoft Information Technologies Co.; 2005; pp. 1-8.
Annevelink et al.; “Heterogeneous Database Intergration in a Physician Workstation”; 1992; 5 pages.
Arsanjani, Ali; “Developing and Integrating Enterprise Components and Services”; Communications of the ACM; vol. 45, No. 10; Oct. 2002; pp. 31-34.
Aversano, Lerina et al.; “Introducing eServices in Business Process Models”; SEKE '02; Ischia Italy; Jul. 15-19, 2002; pp. 481-488.
Baker, Stacy; “Benefits of Assortment Planning”; Assortment Planning for Apparel Retailers—2005 Management Briefing; Just Style; Jun. 2005; 3 pages.
Bastide, Remi et al.; “Formal Specification of CORBA Services: Experience and Lessons Learned”; 2000; pp. 105-117.
Boetterweck, Goetz; “A Model-Driven Approach to the Engineering of Multiple User Interfaces”; Lecture Notes in Computer Science; 2007; vol. 4364/2007; pp. 106-115.
Born, Marc et al.; “Customizing UML for Component Design”; www.dot-profile.de; UML Workshop, Palm Springs, CA; Nov. 2000.
Bratthall, Lars G. et al.; “Integrating Hundreds of Products through One Architecture—The Industrial IT Architecture”; ICSE '02; Orlando, Florida; May 19-25, 2002; pp. 604-614.
Bussler, Christoph; “The Role of B2B Engines in B2B Integration Architectures”; SIGMOD Record; vol. 31, No. 1; Mar. 2002; pp. 67-72.
Carlson, David A.; “Designing XML Vocabularies with UML”; OOPSLA 2000 Companion; Minneapolis, Minnesota; 2000; pp. 95-96.
Coen-Porisini, Alberto et al.; “A Formal Approach for Designing CORBA-Based Applications”; ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology; vol. 12, No. 2; Apr. 2003; pp. 107-151.
Cole, James et al.; “Extending Support for Contracts in ebXML”; IEEE; 2001; pp. 119-127.
Damodaran, Suresh; “B2B Integration over the Internet with XML—RosettaNet Successes and Challenges”; WWW2004; May 17-22, 2004; pp. 188-195.
Definition of “header” and “message header”; Newton's Telecom Dictionary; 18th Edition; 2002; pp. 347, 464.
Diehl et al.; “Service Architecture for an Object-Oriented Next Generation Profile Register”; date unknown; 8 pages.
DiNitto, Elisabetta et al.; “Deriving Executable Process Descriptions from UML”; ICSE '02; May 19-25, 2002; pp. 155-165.
Dogac, Asuman et al.; “An ebXML Infrastructure Implementation through UDDI Registries and RosettaNet PIPs”; ACM SIGMOD; Madison, Wisconsin; Jun. 4-6, 2002; pp. 512-523.
“DOTS Inc. Selects Compass Software's smartmerchandising for Merchandise Planning and Assortment Planning”; PR Newswire; Dec. 11, 2002; 2 pages.
Eyal, Anat et al.; “Integrating and Customizing Heterogeneous E-Commerce Applications”; The VLDB Journal; Aug. 2001; pp. 16-38.
Fingar, Peter; “Component-Based Frameworks for E-Commerce”; Communications of the ACM; vol. 43, No. 10; Oct. 2000; pp. 61-66.
Fremantle, Paul et al.; “Enterprise Services”; Communications of the ACM; vol. 45, No. 10; Oct. 2002; pp. 77-79.
FSML-Financial Services Markup Language (Jul. 14, 1999) http://xml.coverpages.org/FSML-v1500a.pdf; pp. 1-159 (2 parts).
Gable, Julie; “Enterprise Application Integration”; Information Management Journal; Mar./Apr. 2002; pp. 48-52.
Gillibrand, David; “Essential Business Object Design”; Communications of the ACM; vol. 43, No. 2; Feb. 2000; pp. 117-119.
Glushko, Robert J. et al.; “An XML Framework for Agent-Based E-Commerce”; Communications of the ACM; vol. 42, No. 3; Mar. 1999; pp. 106-114.
Gokhale, Aniruddha et al.; “Applying Model-Integrated Computing to Component Middleware and Enterprise Applications”; Communications of the ACM; vol. 45, No. 10; Oct. 2002; pp. 65-70.
Gosain, Sanjay et al.; “The Impact of Common E-Business Interfaces”; Communications of the ACM; vol. 46, No. 2; Dec. 2003; pp. 186-195.
Gruhn, Volker et al.; “Workflow Management Based on Process Model Repositories”; IEEE 1998; pp. 379-388.
Han, Zaw Z. et al.; “Interoperability from Electronic Commerce to Litigation Using XML Rules”; 2003; pp. 93-94.
Hasselbring, Wilhelm; “Information System Integration”; Communications of the ACM; vol. 43, No. 6; Jun. 2000; pp. 33-38.
He, Ning et al.; “B2B Contract Implementation Using Windows DNS”; 2001; pp. 71-79.
“Header”, Newton's Telecom Dictionary; 12th Edition, 2004; pp. 389-390.
Himoff et al.; “MAGENTA Technology: Multi-Agent Systems for Industrial Logistics”; AAMAS'05; Jul. 25-29, 2005; 2005 ACM; pp. 60-66:1-7).
Hogg, K. et al.; “An Evaluation of Web Services in the Design of a B2B Application”; 27th Australasian Computer Science Conference; Dunedin, New Zealand; 2004; pp. 331-340.
Huhns, Michael N. et al.; “Automating Supply-Chain Mangement”; Jul. 15-19, 2002; pp. 1017-1024.
Jaeger, Dirk et al.; “Using UML for Software Process Modeling”; 1999; pp. 91-108.
Kappel, Gerti et al.; “A Framework for Workflow Management Systems Based on Objects, Rules, and Roles”; ACM Computing Surveys; ACM Press; vol. 32; Mar. 2000; 5 pages.
Karp, Alan H.; “E-speak E-xplained”; Communications of the ACM; vol. 46, No. 7; Jul. 2003; pp. 113- 118.
Ketabchi et al.; “Object-Oriented Database Management Support for Software Maintenance and Reverse Engineering”; Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Santa Clara University; 1989; 4 pages.
Khosravi, Navid et al.; “An Approach to Building Model Driven Enterprise Systems in Nebras Enterprise Framework”; OOPSLA '02: Companion of the 17th Annual ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications; Nov. 4-8, 2002; pp. 32-33.
Kim, Dan Jong et al.; “A Comparison of B2B E-Service Solutions”; Communications of the ACM; vol. 46, No. 12; Dec. 2003; pp. 317-324.
Kim, HyoungDo; “Conceptual Modeling and Specification Generation for B2B Business Processes Based on ebXML”; SIGMOD Record; vol. 31, No. 1; Mar. 2002; pp. 37-42.
Lee, Jinyoul et al.; “Enterprise Integration with ERP and EAI”; Communications of the ACM; vol. 46, No. 2; Feb. 2003; pp. 54-60.
Levi, Keith et al.; “A Goal-Driven Approach to Enterprise Component Identification and Specification”; Communications of the ACM; vol. 45, No. 10; Oct. 2002; pp. 45-52.
Lockemann et al.; “Flexibility through Multi-Agent Systems: Solutions or Illusions”; SOFSEM 2004; pp. 41-56.
Lynn, Chris; “Sony Enters Brand Asset Management Market”; The Seybold Report; Analyzing Publishing Technologies; Aug. 4, 2004; <www.Seybold365.com>; 3 pages.
Maamar, Zakaria et al.; “Toward Intelligent Business Objects”; Communications of the ACM; vol. 43, No. 10; Oct. 2000; pp. 99-101.
Mascolo et al.; “An Analytical Method for Performance Evaluation of Kanban Controlled Production Systems”; Operations Research; vol. 44, No. 1; 1996; pp. 50-64.
Medjahed, Brahim et al.; “Composing Web Services on the Semantic Web”; The VLDB Journal; vol. 12, No. 4, Sep. 23, 2003; pp. 333-351.
Medjahed, Brahim et al; “Business-to-Business Interactions: Issues and Enabling Technologies”; The VLDB Journal; vol. 12, No. 1; Apr. 3, 2003; pp. 59-89.
Meltzer, Bart et al.; “XML and Electronic Commerce: Enabling the Network Economy”; SIGMOD Record; ACM Press; vol. 27, No. 4; Dec. 1998; pp. 21-24.
Microsoft; “Creating an XML Web Service Proxy”; 2001; mshelp://ms.msdnqtr.2003apr.1033/cpguide/html/cpconcreatingwebserviceproxy.htm; 3 pages.
Proceedings of OMG Workshops; http://www.omg.org/news/meetings/workshops/proceedings.htm; pp. 1-3. Retrieved on Mar. 17, 2005.
Quix, Christoph et al.; “Business Data Management for Business-to-Business Electronic Commerce”; SIGMOD Record; vol. 31, No. 1; Mar. 2002; pp. 49-54.
SAP 2008 Annual Report; 256 pages.
“SAP Labs and HP Team to Advance Internet-Based Supply Chain Collaboration”; Business Editors and Technology Writers; Business Wire; New York; Feb. 3, 2000; 4 pages.
SAP Structured Entity Relationship Model (SAP-SERM) for R/3 System Release 4.0 (Part 1); Dec. 1998; 5954 pages.
SAP Structured Entity Relationship Model (SAP-SERM) for R/3 System Release 4.0 (Part 2); Dec. 1998; 7838 pages.
SAP Structured Entity Relationship Model (SAP-SERM) for R/3 System Release 4.0 Introduction and Index; Dec. 1998; 26 pages.
SAP; “BC-Central Maintenance and Transport Objects”; Release 4.6C; Apr. 200; 15 pages.
Schulze, Wolfgang et al.; “Standardising on Workflow-Management—The OMG Workflow Management Facility”; SIGGROUP Bulletin; vol. 19, No. 1; Apr. 1998; pp. 24-30.
Shi, Min-Hua et al.; “MQML-Message Queuing Markup Language”; Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Issues of E-Commerce and Web-Based Information Systems (WECWIS 2002); 2002; 8 pages.
Siegel, Jon; “OMG Overview: CORBA and the OMA in Enterprise Computing”; Communications of the ACM; vol. 41, No. 10; Oct. 1998; pp. 37-43.
Skonnard, Aaron et al.; “BizTalk Server 2000: Architecture and Tools for Trading Partner Integration”; MSDn Magazine; 2000; ms-help://ms.msdnqtr.2003apr.1033/dnmag00/htmal/biztalk.htm; 7 pages.
Soederstroem, Eva; “Standardising the Business Vocabulary of Standards”; SAC, Madrid, Spain; 2002; pp. 1048-1052.
Sprott, David; “Componentizing the Enterprise Application Packages”; Communications of the ACM; vol. 43, No. 4; Apr. 2000; pp. 63-69.
Statement in Accordance with the Notice from the European Patent Office dated Oct. 1, 2007 Concerning Business Methods—EPC; Official Journal of the European Patent Office; Munich; Nov. 1, 2007; pp. 592-593.
Stonebraker, Michael; “Too Much Middleware”; SIGMOD Record; vol. 31, No. 1; Mar. 2002; pp. 97-106.
Stumptner, Markus et al.; “On the Road to Behavior-Based Integration”; First Asia-Pacific Conferences on Conceptual Modelling; Dunedin, New Zealand; Jan. 2004; pp. 15-22.
Sutherland, Jeff; “Business Objects in Corporate Information Systems”; ACM Computing Surveys; vol. 27, No. 2; Jun. 1995; pp. 274-276.
Sutherland, Jeff; “Why I Love the OMG: Emergence of a Business Object Component Architecture”; StandardView; vol. 6, No. 1; Mar. 1998; pp. 4-13.
Tenenbaum, Jay M. et al.; “Eco System: An Internet Commerce Architecture”; IEEE; May 1997; pp. 48-55.
Terai, Koichi et al.; “Coordinating Web Services Based on Business Models”; 2003; pp. 473-478.
Trastour, David et al.; “Semantic Web Support for the Business-to-Business E-Commerce Lifecycle”; WWW2002, Honolulu, Hawaii; May 7-11, 2002; pp. 89-98.
“UML in the .com Enterprise: Modeling CORBA, Components, XML/XMI and Metadata Workshop”; <http://www.omg.org/news/meetings/workshops/uml—presentations.htm> retrieved on Mar. 17, 2005.
“Visual and Quantitative Assortment Planning Applications Drive Partnership and Profit”; PR Newswire; Jan. 12, 2006; 3 pages.
Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913+1828); Def. “merchandise”; <http://machaut.uchicago.edu/?resource=Webster%27s&word=merchandise&use1913=on&u>. Retrieved on Sep. 1, 2009.
Yang, J. et al.; “Service Deployment for Virtual Enterprises”; IEEE; 2001; pp. 107-115.
Yang, Jian et al.; “Interoperation Support for Electronic Business”; Communications of the ACM; vol. 43, No. 6; Jun. 2000; pp. 39-47.
Zencke, Peter; “Engineering a Business Platform”; SAP AG 2005; Engineering BPP; [Online] previously available at URL www.sap.com/community/pub/webcast/2006—01—16—Analyst—Summit—Vegas/2006—01—16—Analyst—Summit—Vegas—009.pdf ; 36 pages.
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC issued in European Application No. 07835755.5 on Feb. 22, 2012; 7 pages.
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC issued in related European Application No. 05757432.9 on Jan. 26, 2009; 4 pages.
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) issued in European Application No. 05757432.9 on Apr. 12, 2011; 5 pages.
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) issued in European Application No. 05766672.9 on Jul. 14, 2011; 4 pages.
Communication Pursuant to Rules 70(2) and 70a(2) EPC issued in related European Application No. 07835755.5 on Feb. 28, 2011; 6 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability under Chapter I issued in International Application No. PCT/US2005/019961 on Dec. 4, 2006; 6 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability under Chapter I issued in International Application No. PCT/US2005/021481 on Dec. 20, 2006; 6 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability under Chapter I issued in International Application No. PCT/US2005/021481 on Jul. 15, 2008.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability under Chapter I issued in International Application No. PCT/US2005/022137 on Dec. 28, 2006; 5 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability under Chapter I issued in International Application No. PCT/US2007/011378 on Nov. 17, 2008; 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/CN2011/001238 on May 3, 2012; 9 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/CN2010/073856 on Mar. 17, 2011; 8 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/CN2010/073864 on Mar. 3, 2011; 8 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/CN2010/073868 on Mar. 17, 2011; 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/IB2006/001401 on Aug. 27, 2008; 8 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/US2005/019961 on Sep. 22, 2005; 8 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/US2005/021481 on Apr. 11, 2006; 7 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/US2005/021481 on May 29, 2007; 6 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/US2005/022137 on May 12, 2006; 7 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/US2005/022137 on Sep. 23, 2005; 7 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/US2007/011378 on Apr. 30, 2008; 17 pages.
Supplementary European Search Report issued in related European Application No. 05766672.9 on Oct. 6, 2009; 3 pages.
Supplementary European Search Report issued in related European Application No. 05823434.5 on Sep. 28, 2009; 3 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/864,866 on Jul. 22, 2011; 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/864,866 on Mar. 13, 2012; 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,178 on Dec. 6, 2010; 4 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,178 on Sep. 2, 2011; 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,464 on Feb. 23, 2011; 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,464 on Feb. 6, 2012; 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,464 on Nov. 1, 2010; 4 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,065 on Oct. 9, 2012; 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,065 on Sep. 20, 2010; 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/364,538 on Dec. 13, 2010; 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/364,538 on Jul. 23, 2012; 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/364,538 on Jul. 26, 2011; 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/731,857 on Apr. 11, 2011; 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/731,857 on Dec. 14, 2011; 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/731,857 on Nov. 29, 2010; 4 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/731,857 on Oct. 9, 2012; 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/775,821 on Feb. 4, 2011; 4 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/775,821 on Jul. 16, 2010; 4 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/775,821 on Nov. 2, 2012; 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/775,821 on Oct. 22, 2010; 4 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/803,178 on May 17, 2011; 13 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/803,178 on Jul. 17, 2012; 15 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/864,832 on Aug. 23, 2010; 4 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/864,832 on Dec. 3, 2010; 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/864,832 on Jan. 9, 2012;12 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/864,832 on Jul. 30, 2012;12 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/864,832 on Jul. 7, 2011;11 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/864,832 on Mar. 24, 2010; 11 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/147,395 on Dec. 24, 2012; 11 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/147,395 on Oct. 26, 2010; 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/147,449 on Apr. 28, 2011; 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/155,368 on Mar. 14, 2011; 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/155,368 on Jul. 23, 2012; 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/155,368 on Nov. 8, 2011; 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/155,368 on Oct. 7, 2010; 4 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,065 on Feb. 15, 2012; 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,065 on Mar. 8, 2011; 5 pags.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/640,422 on May 22, 2012; 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/640,422 on Sep. 29, 2011; 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/775,821 on Dec. 30, 2011; 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/775,821 on Sep. 21, 2011; 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/864,786 on Nov. 7, 2012; 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/864,811 on Mar. 2, 2012; 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/864,811 on Nov. 14, 2011; 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/864,811 on Sep. 10, 2012; 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/059,971 on Jun. 28, 2012; 12 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,062 on Mar. 20, 2012; 16 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,062 on Nov. 9, 2012; 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,155 on Apr. 24, 2012; 15 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,171 on Oct. 3, 2012; 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,192 on Mar. 2, 2012; 18 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,192 on Oct. 29, 2012; 12 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/147,378 on Aug. 31, 2012; 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/147,378 on Nov. 9, 2011; 16 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/147,395 on May 4, 2011; 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/323,116 on Jun. 11, 2012; 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/323,139 on Mar. 14, 2012; 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/323,139 on Mar. 4, 2011; 13 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/571,140 on Mar. 20, 2012; 16 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/571,140 on Nov. 9, 2012; 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,618 on May 10, 2012; 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,639 on Sep. 24, 2012; 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/816,293 on Sep. 19, 2012; 7 pages.
Advisory Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/155,368 on Mar. 31, 2010; 3 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/640,422 on Apr. 2, 2009; 13 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,178 on Dec. 7, 2009; 6 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,178 on May 25, 2010; 19 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,464 on Aug. 5, 2009; 31 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,464 on Feb. 5, 2010; 57 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,464 on Jan. 22, 2009; 30 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/155,368 on Dec. 10, 2009; 43 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/155,368 on May 14, 2009; 6 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,065 on Jun. 24, 2009; 6 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/166,065 on Mar. 3, 2010; 25 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/364,538 on Aug. 4, 2009; 5 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/364,538 on Mar. 4, 2010; 40 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/640,422 on Dec. 30, 2009; 9 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/731,857 on Feb. 4, 2010; 22 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/731,857 on May 15, 2009; 11 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/775,821 on Jan. 22, 2010; 16 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/803,178 on Jun. 29, 2009; 5 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/803,178 on Mar. 4, 2010; 43 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/864,786 on Jun. 22, 2009; 7 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/864,786 on Mar. 3, 2010; 12 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/864,832 on Sep. 18, 2009; 14 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/864,863 on Dec. 22, 2011; 20 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/864,863 on Jul. 21, 2011; 29 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/864,866 on Feb. 3, 2011; 20 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/864,871 on Apr. 21, 2010; 20 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/864,871 on Oct. 1, 2010; 30 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/059,804 on Apr. 28, 2011; 14 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/059,860 on Aug. 3, 2011; 15 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/059,860 on Jan. 23, 2012; 16 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/059,867 on Aug. 18, 2009; 37 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/059,867 on Feb. 22, 2010; 24 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/059,971 on May 18, 2011; 13 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/059,971 on Nov. 4, 2010; 20 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,054 on Dec. 7, 2011; 15 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,054 on Jun. 29, 2011; 15 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,062 on Jul. 13, 2011; 16 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,149 on Aug. 26, 2010; 15 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,149 on Feb. 4, 2011; 19 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,155 on May 10, 2011; 8 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,155 on Oct. 31, 2011; 15 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,171 on Aug. 11, 2009; 11 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,171 on Jan. 26, 2011; 17 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,171 on Jul. 1, 2010; 19 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,171 on Mar. 1, 2012; 19 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,171 on Mar. 19, 2010; 10 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,192 on Apr. 14, 2011; 18 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,192 on Sep. 6, 2011; 18 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/147,399 on Jan. 26, 2011; 16 pages.
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/334,175 on May 27, 2011; 12 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/640,422 on May 14, 2010; 12 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/864,786 on Mar. 30, 2012; 12 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/864,811 on Jul. 26, 2011; 7 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/864,811 on Mar. 18, 2011; 10 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/059,804 on Nov. 14, 2011; 15 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,144 on Dec. 8, 2011; 18 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,144 on Jun. 23, 2011; 16 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/147,378 on Jun. 17, 2011; 10 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/147,414 on Apr. 14, 2011; 30 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/147,414 on Oct. 26, 2011; 27 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/323,116 on Jan. 27, 2012; 7 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/323,116 on Sep. 6, 2011; 8 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/571,140 on Sep. 26, 2011; 14 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/571,154 on Apr. 2, 2012; 13 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/571,154 on Aug. 15, 2012; 15 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,576 on Oct. 12, 2012; 11 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,618 on Dec. 22, 2011; 8 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,639 on May 24, 2012; 7 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,698 on Jan. 20, 2012; 10 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,698 on Jul. 20, 2012; 13 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,750 on Sep. 28, 2012; 66 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,802 on Jul. 20, 2012; 16 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,911 on Sep. 26, 2012; 14 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/816,083 on May 9, 2012; 20 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/816,083 on Sep. 21, 2012; 22 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/816,170 on Jul. 24, 2012; 9 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/816,268 on Oct. 11, 2012; 11 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/816,293 on Apr. 25, 2012; 10 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/192,543 on Aug. 28, 2012; 14 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/192,555 on Jul. 20, 2012; 7 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/192,574 on Oct. 24, 2012; 6 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/192,612 on Oct. 4, 2012; 12 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/349,477 on Jun. 29, 2012; 13 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/349,477 on Nov. 15, 2012; 15 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,881 on Dec. 21, 2012; 7 pages.
“Bank for International Settlements, Overview of the New Basel Capital Accord”, 18 pages; Apr. 2003.
Aziz, Jeff et al. “Calculating Credit Exposure and Credit Loss: A Case Study”; ALGO Research Quarterly, vol. 1, No. 1, Sep. 1998; 16 pages.
Baltopoulos, Ioannis, “Introduction to Web Services” Dept. of Computer Science, Imperial College London, CERN School of Computing (iCSC), 41 pages; 2005.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Consultative Document, Overview of the New Basel Capital Accord; Bank for International Settlements; 18 pages; Apr. 2003.
Business Object DTF, Common Business Objects, Ver 1.5; OMG Document bom; Framingham Corporate Center, Framingham, MA; 20 pages; Dec. 4, 1997.
Chinnapen-Rimer, Subendi et al.; “An XML Model for Use Across heterogeneous Client-Server Applications,” IEEE Transactions on Intrumentastion and Measurement, WOct. 2008, vol. 50, No. 10, pp. 2128-2135.
Chou et al. “Web Services for Service-Oriented Communication”, International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing, CollaborateCom 2006, pp. 18, 2006.
Intersystems, Evaluating Integration Software, Ensemble White Paper, 2007, http://www.intersystems.com/ensemble/whitepapers/pdf/evaluating-integration-software.pdf.
Kyal, Anat et al. “Integrating and customizing Heterogeneous e-commerce applications”, Computer Science Department, Tel Aviv University, Raman Aviv, 69978, Israel, Pub. Aug. 2, 2001, 23 pages.
Masoodian et al., “Recoled: A Group-aware Collaborative Text Editor for Capturing Document History” in Proceedings of IADIS International Conference on WWW/Internet, Lisbon, Portugal, Oct. 19-22, International Associate for Development of the Information Society, vol. 1, 323-330. (Date: 2005).
Nemuraite, Lina; “Business Object Modeling Framework for Distributed Enterprise”, Kaunas University of Technology, Launas, Lithuania, Jan. 1999; pp. 189-202.
Oracle Application Integration Architecture Enterprise Business Objects (EBO) Concepts—Concepts, Structure, Terminologies and Design Rules, An Oracle White Paper; 29 pages; Aug. 2009.
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) issued in European Application No. 06765436.8 on Jun. 9, 2015; 5 pages.
Summons to attend oral proceedings pursuant to Rule 115(1) EPS re EP Application No. 05766672.9-1955/1782356 dated Mar. 10, 2014; 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,464 on Sep. 26, 2013; 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/155,368 on Dec. 6, 2013; 11 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/155,368 on Jun. 13, 2013; 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/364,538 on Oct. 24, 2013; 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/640,422 on Apr. 23, 2012; 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/803,178 on May 27, 2014; 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/864,811 on Mar. 19, 2013; 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/864,832 on Jul. 3, 2013; 14 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/864,866 on Jan. 25, 2013; 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/864,871 on Aug. 14, 2013; 20 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/059,867 on Jul. 17, 2013; 22 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/059,971 on Aug. 12, 2014; 11 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,144 on Mar. 20, 2013; 12 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,149 on Jul. 9, 2013; 18 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,155 on Jan. 11, 2013; 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,178 on Feb. 14, 2013; 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/147,378 on Dec. 6, 2013; 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/147,414 on Jun. 19, 2013; 23 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/147,449 on Sep. 17, 2013; 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/323,116 on Jun. 27, 2013; 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/323,139 on Feb. 8, 2013; 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,618 on May 7, 2013; 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,802 on Nov. 27, 2012; 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,869 on May 20, 2015; 19 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/186,361 on Jun. 10, 2013; 11 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/192,548 on Jan. 10, 2014; 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/192,553 on May 1, 2013; 21 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/192,574 on Jun. 14, 2013; 11 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/192,599 on Sep. 12, 2013; 14 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/192,612 on Oct. 16, 2013; 16 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/349,477 on Oct. 25, 2013; 12 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/398,191 on Feb. 3, 2014; pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/398,200 on Nov. 6, 2014; 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/398,228 on Feb. 16, 2012; 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/398,331 on Feb. 16, 2012; 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,403 on Sep. 12, 2014; 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,418 on Sep. 25, 2014; 12 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,419 on Feb. 11, 2014; 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,667 on Jun. 10, 2014; 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,864 on Sep. 24, 2013; 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/591,780 on Feb. 10, 2015, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/591,804 on Apr. 8, 2015; 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/754,608 on Jul. 9, 2013; 12 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/770,508 on Mar. 26, 2014; 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/832,301 on May 26, 2015; 14 pages.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/832,561 on Jun. 1, 2015; 14 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,730 on Mar. 20, 2014; 15 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,670 on Jun. 24, 2013; 13 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/803,178 on Nov. 22, 2013; 7 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/059,804 on Aug. 1, 2014; 19 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/059,860 on Mar. 20, 2014; 24 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/059,860 on Sep. 17, 2013; 18 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/060,054 on Dec. 20, 2013; 14 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/571,576 on Aug. 1, 2014; 15 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,576 on Feb. 15, 2013; 13 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,698 on Aug. 15, 2014; 14 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,750 on May 7, 2015; 81 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,750 on Dec. 26, 2014; 75 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,750 on Feb. 21, 2013; 67 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,869 on Feb. 15, 2013; 27 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,869 on Jul. 18, 2013; 27 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,869 on Oct. 27, 2014; 31 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,911 on Feb. 25, 2013; 15 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/816,268 on Apr. 26, 2013; 17 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/816,268 on Mar. 21, 2014; 14 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/823,996 on Apr. 25, 2013; 8 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/823,996 on Mar. 22, 2013, 7 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13,535,587 on Dec. 6, 2013, 9 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13,535,667 on Jun. 26, 2013; 12 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/186,361 on Feb. 26, 2013, 10 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/192,543 on Dec. 13, 2012; 26 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/192,548 on Jun. 7, 2013; 15 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/192,553 on Feb. 11, 2013, 23 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/192,555 on Mar. 1, 2013; 11 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/192,555 on Sep. 13, 2013; 10 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/192,564 on Apr. 22, 2013; 21 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/192,564 on Nov. 6, 2013; 37 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/192,574 on Apr. 30, 2013; 5 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/192,590 on Oct. 18, 2013; 11 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/192,599 on Mar. 21, 2013; 29 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/218,876 on Apr. 5, 2013; 10 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/218,876 on Jul. 16, 2013; 14 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/218,876 on Oct. 4, 2013; 24 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/340,510 on Mar. 17, 2015; 6 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/340,510 on Aug. 14, 2014; 5 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/340,510 on Oct. 11, 2013; 7 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/349,477 on Jul. 22, 2013; 6 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/398,191 on Oct. 15, 2013; 9 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/398,200 on Jun. 25, 2014; 9 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/398,228 on Oct. 17, 2013; 8 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/398,269 on May 7, 2015; 20 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/398,331 on Oct. 24, 2013; 8 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/398,374 on Apr. 29, 2015; 14 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/398,374 on Apr. 4, 2014; 6 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/398,374 on Oct. 10, 2014; 12 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/398,438 on Dec. 19, 2014; 14 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,406 on Apr. 23, 2014; 10 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,419 on Apr. 19, 2013; 14 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,419 on Oct. 22, 2013; 11 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,433 on May 22, 2015; 18 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,433 on Aug. 2, 2013; 11 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,433 on Mar. 4, 2013; 11 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,433 on Nov. 21, 2014; 14 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,435 on Dec. 16, 2013; 15 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,435 on Jun. 21, 2013; 13 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,443 on Feb. 20, 2015; 12 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,443 on Sep. 19, 2014; 9 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,446 on Jan. 21, 2014; 14 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,446 on Jun. 25, 2014; 18 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,453 on Dec. 20, 2013; 21 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,453 on Jul. 5, 2013; 22 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,477 on Apr. 27, 2015; 7 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,477 on Jul. 21, 2014; 13 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,483 on Jun. 23, 2014; 10 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,483 on Nov. 21, 2013, 10 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,484 on Feb. 23, 2015; 8 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,512 on Jul. 5, 2013; 10 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,512 on Oct. 25, 2013; 16 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,521 on Apr. 16, 2013; 16 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,521 on Aug. 30, 2013; 15 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,546 on Aug. 29, 2014, 14 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,587 on Mar. 20, 2014; 11 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,600 on Dec. 5, 2013; 16 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,600 on Jun. 21, 2013; 14 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,625 on Aug. 15, 2013; 22 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,625 on Dec. 10, 2013; pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,648 on Dec. 16, 2013; 16 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,648 on Jun. 21, 2013; 14 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,664 on Aug. 11, 2014; 16 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,664 on Dec. 31, 2014; 13 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,667 on Feb. 25, 2015; 6 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,667 on Dec. 26, 2012; 9 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,667 on Sep. 22, 2014; 5 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,670 on Dec. 17, 2013; 15 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,674 on Dec. 16, 2013; 19 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,674 on Jul. 3, 2013; 17 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,703 on Feb. 28, 2014, 15 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,703 on Oct. 31, 2013, 11 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,722 on Dec. 17, 2013; 11 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,723 on Apr. 24, 2013; 16 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,723 on Aug. 23, 2013; 16 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,730 on Jul. 15, 2014; 17 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,730 on Sep. 23, 2014; 17 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,750 on Nov. 6, 2013; 20 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,831 on Apr. 2, 2014; 16 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,831 on Jul. 15, 2014; 18 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,831 on Sep. 24, 2014, 20 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,854 on Aug. 1, 2014; 19 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,854 on Feb. 5, 2014; 10 pages.
Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/535,864 on May 10, 2013; 9 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/591,756 on Jun. 20, 2014; 9 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/591,756 on Apr. 9, 2015; 8 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/591,756 on Nov. 14, 2014; 4 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/591,780 on Jun. 25, 2014; pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/591,780 on Oct. 16, 2014; 5 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/591,798 on Feb. 13, 2015; 22 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/591,798 on Aug. 1, 2014; 24 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/591,804 on Jan. 2, 2015; 10 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/591,804 on Jun. 23, 2014; 5 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/591,804 on Sep. 24, 2014, 9 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/626,352 on Mar. 13, 2015; 10 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/703,471 on Mar. 10, 2015; 14 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/703,471 on Sep. 10, 2014; 19 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/754,608 on Apr. 215, 2013; 15 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/770,508 on Oct. 7, 2013; 6 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/832,301 on Dec. 23, 2014; 15 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/832,387 on May 5, 2015; 66 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/832,387 on Dec. 8, 2014; 36 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/832,464 on Apr. 2, 2015; 12 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/832,561 on Dec. 24, 2014; 15 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/832,642 on Jan. 16, 2015; 20 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/832,688 on Aug. 27, 2014; 6 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/832,688 on Dec. 3, 2014, 7 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/832,688 on Mar. 14, 2014; 9 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/832,951 on Feb. 12, 2015; 10 pages.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/165,243 on Mar. 26, 2015; 17 pages.

Related Publications (1)

	Number	Date	Country
	20130219292 A1	Aug 2013	US

Consistent interface for feed event, feed event document and feed event type

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

Field of Search

CPC

International Classifications

Disclaimer

Term Extension

Abstract

Description

Claims

US Referenced Citations (455)

Foreign Referenced Citations (8)

Non-Patent Literature Citations (442)

Related Publications (1)