The present invention relates to a printing machine. More particularly, the present invention relates to a label applicator for use with an offset printer for printing and labeling containers.
It is desirable to apply a printed image to containers such as cans and cups. Such a printed image may be an advertisement, decorative image, or any other desirable print for a surface of the container. It has become desirable to additionally apply a label to the container so that the label is positioned at a prescribed location relative to the printed image. For example, the label may be a game piece, or a coupon good toward the purchase of a product.
In this specification and in the attached claims, the word “label” is intended to apply to any item which is configured to be attached to a container in a predetermined location to provide information or to serve as a game piece or coupon. A game piece is illustratively a one-, two-, or multiple-ply label that typically includes a portion separable by a consumer to expose an indication of whether the consumer wins some kind of prize related to the contest or promotion.
According to the present disclosure, an apparatus is provided for applying a label to an object such as a container, can, or cup during the process of printing an image on the object. It should be understood, however, that the present disclosure is not limited to application of labels only to containers.
The apparatus comprises a printer and a label applicator coupled to the printer. Illustratively, a holder engages the object and moves the object relative to the printer and the label applicator. The label applicator applies a label to a first surface area of the object when the first surface area is near the label applicator. The printer prints an image on a second surface area of the object when the second surface area is near the printer.
The application of the label to the object is coordinated with the printing of an image on the object. With such coordination, the label can be positioned in a prescribed or predetermined position relative to the printed image.
According to an illustrated embodiment, the label applicator is positioned relative to the printer so that the label can be applied to the first surface area of the object at substantially the same time that the image is printed on the second surface area of the object. The label applicator includes a retainer for retaining the label in a first position for a prescribed period of time while the object is being printed. Illustratively, the object is rotated while being printed. At the proper time, the retainer moves the label toward the object. A control system couples the printer to the label applicator to coordinate the printing of the object such that the label is in a predetermined position relative to the printed image. The control system may include a processor coupled to the printer and a second processor coupled to the label applicator.
The illustrative control system includes a programmable limit switch coupled to the printer, wherein the programmable limit switch is configured to determine the position of the object relative to the printer and report that position via outputs. The illustrative control system further includes an actuator coupled to the label applicator and coupled to the outputs of the programmable limit switch, wherein the actuator is configured to control the label applicator in response to signals from the programmable limit switch. Illustratively, the control system may include a resolver and/or an encoder configured to determine the cycle position of the apparatus.
Vacuum pressure is used to retain the label in the first position, and positive pressure (in the form of an air blast) is used to move the label toward the object. In an illustrative embodiment, the label is applied to the object prior to the completion of printing, and printed image is omitted from the portion of the object covered by the label.
It will be appreciated that one aspect of the invention is a combination of a container printer and a label applicator. The label applicator is configured to apply a label to a prescribed area of each container while each container rotates about an axis. The printer comprises a printing head and a container feeder that is configured to present each container to the printing head. Each container rotates about its own axis adjacent the printing head, while the label applicator is positioned and configured to apply a label to each container during its rotation.
Additional features of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon consideration of the following detailed description of preferred embodiments exemplifying the best mode of carrying out the invention as presently perceived.
The detailed description particularly refers to the accompanying figures in which:
A machine such as an offset printer 10, as shown in
The illustration in
Label applicator 12 includes a label feeder 13, an arm 15 (often referred to in the art as a snorkel) extending from the label feeder into offset printer 10, and a retainer 34. Label feeder 13 includes a label dispensing reel 18 for supplying adhesive labels 20 on a backing 22, as shown in FIG. 2. Backing 22 is directed through directing rollers 24 past applicator head 26 to intake reel 32 by tension applied by takeup roller 31. As backing 22 moves through applicator head 26, labels 20 are removed from backing 22 and subsequently applied to an object, such as a container 14. Illustratively, label feeder 13 (also known as a “label head” in the art) is manufactured by CTM Integration Inc. of Salem, Ohio as model 360. The label applicator 12, as ordered from CTM Integration Inc., is supplied with a processor-type control system (referred to as an actuator herein) to be described hereinafter, which control system is coupled to the printer control system (referred to as a programmable limit switch 80 herein).
Illustratively, label applicator 12 is also provided with adjustment levers 23, 25. Adjustment lever 23 provides for movement of pressure arm 21, the pressure arm 21 configured to position backing 22 and labels 20 proximate to peel plate 28. Adjustment lever 25 provides adjustment of a brush (not shown) for optimal tracking of backing 22.
In the illustrative embodiment, arm 15 includes a peel plate 28, as shown in detail in
Upon separation from backing 22, label 20 is retained by a retainer 34. Retainer 34 can be any suitable means for temporarily retaining label 20 in a first position prior to label 20 being transferred to container 14. Illustratively, as shown in
In the preferred embodiment shown in
RVB head 36, as shown in assembly view in
Illustratively, pad 42 is configured to have a raised portion 52 having a flat side 54, shown in
Offset printer 10 operates substantially as follows. Objects, such as containers 14, are fed into offset printer 10 and positioned on holders such as the illustrative mandrels 58 (shown in FIG. 2). In the disclosed embodiment, mandrels 58 apply a vacuum pressure to each container 14 in order to secure the container to the mandrel during processing. Each container 14 is then directed with mandrel 58 to a position such that the container 14 is disposed near or proximate to a print wheel 60. Print wheel 60 can be any container-printing device known in the art, and illustratively includes printing blankets 62 mounted on the periphery of print wheel 60. Print wheel 60 rotates about a central axis 66, as seen from FIG. 1. The rotational movement of print wheel 60 cyclically presents printing blankets 62 before inking units 64, whereby each inking unit 64 applies a certain color of ink to print blankets 62 for eventual transfer to containers 14.
Illustratively, print wheel 60 moves counterclockwise about central axis 66 as seen from
As each container 14 is positioned to be disposed near print wheel 60, a printing blanket 62 contacts outer surface 68 of container 14, as shown in
As print wheel 60 and printing blanket 62 cooperate to impart a printed image 16 on container 14, label applicator 12 operates to apply a label on the container 14 at a prescribed position relative to printed image 16, as shown in FIG. 3. An encoder or programmable limit switch 80, shown diagrammatically in
The illustrative programmable limit switch 80 utilizes a resolver to indicate the relative cycle positions of the offset printer 10 and the object being printed. The Plus PS-6144 Series model resolver uses fixed and rotating coils of wire to generate an electronic signal that represents a shaft position. It will be appreciated, therefore, that such printers as the illustrative Van Dam Machine, B.V. printer may have controls, encoders, resolvers, etc. establishing the relative position of the print wheel 60. Illustratively, in accordance with the present invention, the outputs of such printer controls are coupled to the label applicator 12 to coordinate the label applicator with the operation of the offset printer 10.
For example, in the illustrative embodiment, programmable limit switch 80 includes at least one spare output channel for communicative coupling with label applicator 12. Illustratively, the Plus PS-6144 model disclosed above includes a spare output “channel 13” (not shown) which is coupled with an input of actuator 82 (shown in
Upon receiving the signal from the spare output channel, actuator 82 signals for label applicator 12 to apply a label 20 at a predetermined position on the container 14 using the process described herein. Each signal from the spare output channel of programmable limit switch 80 prompts actuator 82 to advance one cycle, thereby applying one label 20 to one container 14. The label applicator 12 “on” and “off” points relative to the cycle position can be adjusted with a keypad (not shown) provided with the programmable limit switch 80. In the illustrated embodiment, the actuator 82 is communicatively coupled with takeup roller 31 and valve 50 of applicator head 26 such that, upon signaling from the spare output channel, actuator 82 directs takeup roller 31 to advance, thereby presenting a label 20 to peel plate 28. In conjunction with peeling of a label from backing 22, valve 50 functions as described below to apply a label 20 to the presented container 14.
Label 20 separates from backing 22 as backing 22 corners around peel plate 28, as shown in FIG. 4. Upon separation from backing 22, label 20 is retained by retainer 34 until retainer 34 is signaled by the programmable limit switch 80 to initiate the transfer of label 20 to container 14. Illustratively, retainer 34 is an RVB head 36, as disclosed above, the RVB head being activated by valve 50 in combination with pneumatic feed 40. In the illustrated embodiment, RVB head 36 retains label 20 with vacuum pressure conducted through apertures 38. Upon signal from the programmable limit switch 80 to valve 50, RVB head 36 then applies positive pressure to apertures 38, forcing label 20 toward container 14.
During the printing process (while container 14 is in contact with printing blanket 62), container 14 rotates about its axis 70 at a high rate of speed, i.e. 300-600 RPM. In order to ensure proper application of label 20, RVB head 36 sends label 20 toward container 14 at a high velocity. In the illustrative embodiment, an air blast is used to apply the positive pressure. The requisite label velocity is accomplished with the provision of a number of apertures 38, as shown in
During and after application of label 20 to container 14, container 14 continues to rotate in direction 72, as shown in FIG. 3. In the illustrative embodiment, printing blanket 62 is recessed at an area 76 corresponding to the applied label 20 on container 14. Recessed area 76 is substantially aligned with label 20, as applied to container 14, such that no printing occurs over label 20 after it is applied. It should be understood that recess area 76 is not required, however, for printing to be omitted over label 20. The inking of printing blankets 62 can be controlled such that no ink is applied in the area of printing blankets 62 that will contact label 20.
Application of label 20 during the printing process eliminates a secondary operation that is more costly and largely duplicative in steps. If a label were to be applied after printing, the containers would first need to be loaded onto another machine, the machine would have to align the containers and search for the desired labeling area, and then apply the label. These extra steps and the extra machine are unnecessary with the use of the disclosed invention.
Although the invention has been described in detail with reference to certain preferred embodiments, variations and modifications exist within the scope and spirit of the invention as described and defined in the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1956862 | Gantz | May 1934 | A |
3291675 | Orkiff et al. | Dec 1966 | A |
3625412 | Rosenburg, Jr. | Dec 1971 | A |
3661075 | Amberg | May 1972 | A |
3685441 | Aebersold et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
3695176 | Van Der Roer | Oct 1972 | A |
3710712 | Demierre | Jan 1973 | A |
3739975 | Davidow | Jun 1973 | A |
3867882 | Ahlgren et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3905292 | Rossi | Sep 1975 | A |
RE28732 | von Hofe | Mar 1976 | E |
4042445 | Klund et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4119482 | Bennett | Oct 1978 | A |
4287824 | Boyle | Sep 1981 | A |
4306367 | Otto | Dec 1981 | A |
4332635 | Holbrook et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4337719 | vander Griendt et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4345393 | Price et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4368665 | Boyle | Jan 1983 | A |
4370665 | Scranton et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4372457 | Kunimoto et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4529871 | Davidson | Jul 1985 | A |
4559729 | White | Dec 1985 | A |
4561921 | Treiber | Dec 1985 | A |
4587926 | Dominico | May 1986 | A |
4612079 | Ostrow | Sep 1986 | A |
4620664 | Kaufman et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4813355 | Stork | Mar 1989 | A |
4834240 | Dagostine | May 1989 | A |
4846504 | MacGregor et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4892184 | vander Griendt et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4936208 | Tielrooy | Jun 1990 | A |
5074462 | Countee, Jr. | Dec 1991 | A |
5076613 | Kovacs | Dec 1991 | A |
5120392 | Butkevich et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5191979 | Nemeroff | Mar 1993 | A |
5232540 | Southwell et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5240173 | Dagostine | Aug 1993 | A |
5355797 | Tielrooy | Oct 1994 | A |
5409754 | Yasuda et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5425823 | Woodside, III | Jun 1995 | A |
5433572 | Swain et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5435862 | Williams et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5540795 | Franklin et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5550745 | Wurz | Aug 1996 | A |
5697549 | Yocum | Dec 1997 | A |
5713679 | Taylor | Feb 1998 | A |
5799574 | Williams et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5839581 | Vagedes | Nov 1998 | A |
5839599 | Lin | Nov 1998 | A |
5843252 | Murphy | Dec 1998 | A |
5865918 | Franklin et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
D410677 | Matsumoto et al. | Jun 1999 | S |
5954913 | Wurz et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5970865 | Horth et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5992892 | Schaefer et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5996664 | Gregoire | Dec 1999 | A |
5996887 | Cai et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006808 | Ewert et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6027018 | Yocum | Feb 2000 | A |
6139665 | Schmelzer et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6142331 | Breining et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6143105 | Nash et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6179030 | Rietheimer | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6206570 | Cortopassi | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6237843 | Falat et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6257136 | McCoy et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6257294 | Weisbeck | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6389971 | McKillip | May 2002 | B1 |
6811648 | Dominico | Nov 2004 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030015105 A1 | Jan 2003 | US |