This invention relates to containers for storage, dispensing and preservation of compositions containing meloxicam.
Some pharmaceutical compositions as for example injectable compositions require to be sterilised prior to administration. These pharmaceutical compositions have to be manufactured and stored under sterile conditions. A multi-layered plastic polymeric container for the storage of a chemical composition that may or may not be sterilised is disclosed in WO2008/152122. The herein disclosed bottles have a volume of 50 ml to 500 ml. A plastic container made of polyethylene naphthylate with a closure device for storing and preserving a composition of sodium benzoate and cefdinir is disclosed in WO2007/087214.
It is crucial that the material of the container is pharmaceutically acceptable meaning that it should not interfere with the pharmaceutical composition or alter the quality of the compositions. The reverse must also be valid, that the pharmaceutical compositions should not interfere or alter the nature and/or composition of the container. Any alterations that may occur can result in the migration of chemicals from and to the container material and/or the pharmaceutical composition. Any chemicals from the container material that may mix with the solution will be impurities within the solution that may affect the solution by degrading the composition or may not be tolerated in any other way. Degradation may also occur over time under the action of oxygen, light and/or temperature. If the container and/or solution has been sterilised by for example irradiation, then this may also result in degradation of any of the material. The chemical properties of the pharmaceutical composition, such as the stability of the active ingredient may alter over time because of any interactions and thus reduce the lifetime of the formulation. Another interaction that has to be avoided is adsorption of any of the components, especially sodium benzoate, within the solution to the material of the bottle.
The pharmaceutical composition comprising meloxicam is a very frequently used drug for veterinary medicine for the treatment of for example pain, post-operative pain, inflammation, fever, diarrhea, lameness, problems with the locomotor apparatus, respiratory complaints, osteoarthritis. It is available not only in different formulations but also in dosage forms which are optimised for the use of a pharmaceutical composition for several animal species.
Oral suspensions of meloxicam with a concentration of 1.5 mg/ml are established for the treatment of dogs for more than 10 years. This formulation is revealed in the patent application WO99/49845.
In addition it was found that the drug is suitable for the treatment of cats as well. The palatability of the formulation in both dogs and cats is exceptional, thus ensuring an excellent compliance of drug treatment. For cats an oral suspension with 0.5 mg/ml of meloxicam has been developed, which allows accurate dosing according to the body weight of the animal.
Oral suspension of 0.5 mg/ml meloxicam for chronic treatment has been approved. This suspension is available in 25 ml high-density polyethylene (HDPE) bottles filled with 15 ml of the suspension. For both the 1.5 mg/ml and the 0.5 mg/ml suspension a decrease of the sodium benzoate content over time can be observed. It could be proven that this loss of the preservative is explained not by chemical degradation, but by adsorption of sodium benzoate to the bottle wall. Sodium benzoate is used as the preservative and is the only substance of the solution, which can be active as a preservative and because of its adsorption it needed to be assessed whether the formulation is still adequately preserved over the shelf-life of the product. It could be demonstrated that at a sodium benzoate content of 70% of the label claim of 0.15 mg/ml the formulation is still fulfilling all requirements of the European Pharmacopoeia for preservative efficacy. This approach of increasing the preservative in order to prolong the potential shelf-life of the formulation is undesirable as it cannot be completely excluded that preservatives may cause irritation or allergic reactions. It would be an unnecessary amount of preservatives that would be given to the animals.
For the acute treatment in cats a smaller bottle is required which contains enough of the pharmaceutical solution for the treatment of up to five (5) days. A container with approximately three (3) ml of an oral suspension comprising 0.5 mg/ml meloxicam would fulfil these requirements. In addition such a composition would allow the treatment of several other species like small dogs (with a body weight of 0.5 kg up to 5 kg), rabbits and guinea pigs. Thus the problem underlying the present invention was to provide a plastic container containing a pharmaceutical composition comprising benzoic acid or a derivative thereof or a pharmaceutical acceptable salt thereof and a COX-inhibitor of the oxicam-type or a pharmaceutical acceptable salt thereof avoiding a significant loss of benzoic acid or a derivative thereof during storage. Furthermore, the problem underlying the present invention was to provide a plastic container containing a pharmaceutical composition comprising sodium benzoate and meloxicam avoiding a significant loss of sodium benzoate during storage.
The present invention relates to a plastic container containing a pharmaceutical composition comprising benzoic acid or a derivative thereof or a pharmaceutical acceptable salt thereof and a COX-inhibitor of the oxicam-type or a pharmaceutical acceptable salt thereof, wherein the container material is selected from one or more members of the group consisting of a homopolymer of polypropylene (PP), a copolymer of polypropylene (PP), a homopolymer of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and a copolymer of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and optionally non-polymeric components. This container stores and/or preserves a pharmaceutical composition comprising sodium benzoate and meloxicam or a pharmaceutical acceptable salt thereof, wherein the container material is constituted of polypropylene (PP) or polyethylene terephthalate (PET), i.e. the container material is selected from the group consisting of homopolymer of polypropylene (PP), copolymer of polypropylene (PP), homopolymer of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and copolymer of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and optionally non-polymeric components. The container also includes a closure device for storing and preserving a pharmaceutical composition, which can also be connected to a dispensing device.
The plastic container for storing, preserving and/or dispensing a pharmaceutical composition comprising sodium benzoate and meloxicam or a pharmaceutical acceptable salt thereof has a volume of 3 to 11 ml with a total volume of the liquid composition of 2 ml to 10 ml.
The pharmaceutical composition that is stored and preserved within the bottle is a meloxicam-containing composition with meloxicam in a concentration of 0.2 mg/ml to 20 mg/ml. The pharmaceutical composition also comprises sodium benzoate in the concentration range of 0.8 mg/ml to 2.0 mg/ml.
Surprisingly the combination of the container according to the current invention and the pharmaceutical composition comprising meloxicam and sodium benzoate enables the composition to remain substantially stable over 18 months or at least 18 months.
The present invention relates to a plastic container containing a pharmaceutical composition comprising benzoic acid, a derivative or pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and an oxicam or a pharmaceutical acceptable salt thereof, characterised in that the container material is polypropylene (PP) or polyethylene terephthalate (PET). The plastic container is made of container material containing plastic/polymers such as PP or PET and optionally one or more, preferably one or two, most preferably one, non-polymeric components. Furthermore, the present invention relates to a plastic container containing a pharmaceutical composition comprising benzoic acid, a derivative or pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and a COX-inhibitor of the oxicam-type or a pharmaceutical acceptable salt thereof, wherein the container material is selected from one or more members, preferably one member, of the group consisting of a homopolymer of polypropylene (PP), a copolymer of polypropylene (PP), a homopolymer of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and a copolymer of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and optionally one or more non-polymeric components. The present invention also relates to a plastic container containing a pharmaceutical composition comprising sodium benzoate and meloxicam or a pharmaceutical acceptable salt thereof, wherein the container material is selected from one or more members, preferably one member, of the group consisting of a homopolymer of polypropylene (PP), a copolymer of polypropylene (PP), a homopolymer of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and a copolymer of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and optionally one or more non-polymeric components. The container is equipped with a closure device for storage and preservation of a pharmaceutical composition. The container allows a stable preservation of said composition for 18 months or at least 18 months. Throughout the whole specification, by the terms polypropylene (PP) is meant a homopolymer, one or more copolymers or a combination thereof, especially random copolymers. Throughout the whole specification, by the terms polyethylene terephthalate (PET) is meant a homopolymer, one or more copolymers or a combination thereof, especially random copolymers.
A vast variety of polymeric materials are commonly used for containers or packaging, which contain pharmaceutical compositions such as for example polyvinyl chloride (PVC), poly(ethylene-vinyl acetate) or any other polyolefin. Different types of containers made from different polymers are not suitable for the use in the current invention such as high-density polyethylene (HDPE), low-density polyethylene (LDPE), polycarbonate (PC) or glass. Only the material according to the current invention, polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET), is usable and fulfils for purpose of the invention. Different types of PP are suitable for the intended purpose such as but not limited to Purell RP270G white (Basell), RB845MO (Borealis), PPM R021 (Total Atofina). It has been surprisingly found that polypropylene and polyethylene terephthalate but particularly polypropylene does not result in any adsorption of the preservative from the solution onto the wall of the bottle and thus leads to an increased stability of the solution. Thus the invention relates to a plastic container containing a pharmaceutical composition comprising sodium benzoate and meloxicam or a pharmaceutical acceptable salt thereof, wherein the container material is polypropylene (PP) or polyethylene terephthalate (PET) with the purpose of storing and/or preserving a pharmaceutical composition. The container further comprises a closure device for storing and preserving a pharmaceutical composition. A suitable closure is e.g. a two-piece tamper-proof and child-resistant closure. A suitable type is e.g. a cap type LT.9171 supplied by Gerresheimer Boleslawiec S. A., Boleslawiec, Poland.
The inventions also relates to an oral dispenser of the pharmaceutical composition that can be connected to the container, which allows a precise administration of the pharmaceutical composition. Thus the bottle according to the invention is suitable for connecting a dispenser to the bottle opening. Due to the necessity of accurate but flexible dosing according to the body weight of the animal to be treated, oral dispensers are the first choice for administration of a specific volume of the formulation from the bottle. For this purpose plastic materials are more suitable due to the fact that the containers are slightly collapsible so that the pressure differences by pulling of a certain volume of liquid from the bottle can be neglected. The material of this dispensing equipment may comprise for example either polyethylene (PE), low-density polyethylene (LDPE) or high-density polyethylene (HDPE). The dispenser can be connected for administration of the pharmaceutical composition and disconnected after usage. Thus the plastic container can be connected to a dispensing device.
The dosing system as described above consists of a plastic adapter and a dosing syringe. The plastic adapter is pressed into the bottle with the bottom part. The adapter has a cylindrical and slightly conical shape. An example is given in
In case no dropper function is required, a plug-in device can be used instead. An example is given in
A plastic container for storing, preserving and/or dispensing a pharmaceutical composition comprising sodium benzoate and meloxicam or a pharmaceutical acceptable salt thereof wherein the liquid composition has a volume of 2 ml to 10 ml, 2.5 ml to 8 ml, 2.5 ml to 5 ml, preferably 3.5 ml to 4.5 ml, even more preferred 3 ml to 4.5 ml.
A plastic container for storing, preserving and/or dispensing a pharmaceutical composition, wherein said container has a volume of 3 ml to 11 ml, 3 ml to 10 ml, 3 ml to 8 ml, 3 ml to 5 ml, preferably 3.5 to 4.5, even more preferred containing a volume of 3 ml to 4 ml.
The container can for example have a volume of 8 ml and can contain a volume of liquid of 5 ml but is actually filled with a liquid volume of 3.5 to 4 ml in order to secure a dispensing volume of 3 ml.
A dispensing volume may be the volume that has to be guaranteed for availability and thus dosing.
Containers of the present invention may contain a solution or suspension comprising meloxicam and sodium benzoate. The preferred concentration of meloxicam in the pharmaceutical composition is 0.2 mg/ml to 20 mg/ml, preferably 0.5 mg/ml to 15 mg/ml, more preferably 0.5 mg/ml, 1.5 mg/ml or 15.0 mg/ml. The preferred concentration of sodium benzoate in the pharmaceutical composition is 0.8 mg/ml to 2.0 mg/ml, preferably 1.5 mg/ml.
The active ingredient can be any nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, which is a cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitor of the oxicam-type such as meloxicam, piroxicam, lornoxicam, tenoxicam, droxicam, isoxicam, preferably meloxicam.
The formulation used according to the invention may contain the oxicam compound as a base or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. Preferably the salt of meloxicam is selected from the group consisting of meglumine, sodium, potassium or ammonium salt, most preferably the meloxicam meglumine salt.
Other ingredients of the solution or suspension comprise commonly known agents for suspensions or solutions such as suspending agents, preservatives, flavouring agents, ph adjusters and solvents such as for example water that are used for said formulations. Specific examples for a typical suspension are displayed in table 1.
Suspending agents used may be for example organic hydrocolloid forming agents such as cellulose ether and/or silicon dioxide, preferably hydroxyethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose and/or silicon dioxide or colloidal anhydrous silica, preferably colloidal anhydrous silica and/or hydroxyethyl cellulose.
Preservatives used may be for example benzoic acid or any derivatives or salts thereof, preferably sodium benzoate.
Flavouring agents used may be for example sugar alcohols such as glycerol, sorbitol, mannitol, xylitol or artificial sweeteners such as saccharin or any of its salt, cyclamate, aspartame, sucralose, taumatin, or any of their salts, acesulfam-potassium, aqueous solutions thereof, or mixtures thereof, preferably sorbitol, glycerol saccharin or sodium saccharin and glycerol. Other flavouring agents may be artificial aromas such as an artificial fruit or meat aroma as for example honey, strawberry, raspberry, or beef or fish flavour, preferably honey.
The pH adjusters used may be for example sodium dihydrogen phosphate dihydrate/citric acid monohydrate buffer, glycine/HCl, K-hydrogen phthalate/HCl, citric acid/phosphate, citrate-phophate-borate/HCl or Britton-Robinson buffer, mixtures thereof or mixtures with other physiologically acceptable liquids such as glycerol or optionally aqueous solutions of sugar alcohols, preferably sodium dihydrogen phosphate dihydrate and citric acid monohydrate.
In a further embodiment the plastic container is made of PP or PET with a volume of 8 ml comprising meloxicam with a concentration of 0.5 mg/ml and sodium benzoate in a concentration of 1.5 mg/ml. More specifically said plastic container has a volume of 8 ml containing a pharmaceutical composition with a volume of 3.5 ml to 4 ml comprising meloxicam in a concentration of 0.5 mg/ml and sodium benzoate in a concentration of 1.5 mg/ml.
In a further embodiment the plastic container is made of PP or PET with a volume of 8 ml containing a pharmaceutical composition with a volume of 3.5 ml to 4 ml comprising meloxicam in a concentration of 1.5 mg/ml and sodium benzoate in a concentration of 0.8 mg/ml to 2.0 mg/ml, preferably 1.5 mg/ml.
In a further embodiment the plastic container is made of PP or PET with a volume of 8 ml containing a pharmaceutical composition with a volume of 3.5 ml to 4 ml comprising meloxicam in a concentration of 15.0 mg/ml and sodium benzoate in a concentration of 0.8 mg/ml to 2.0 mg/ml, preferably 1.5 mg/ml.
The preferred pharmaceutical composition filled into containers made of the different types of packaging has been subject to a long-term stability programme according to the conditions as described in the VICH guideline 3. The conditions used for storage were 25° C./60% r.h. (r.h.=relative humidity), 30° C./70% r.h., and 40° C./75% r.h.
The stability studies of a 0.5 mg/ml suspension were carried out with 3 ml and 4 ml of the suspension being filled into 5 ml HDPE bottles. It was found that the decrease of sodium benzoate over time was surprisingly high, even directly after filling the container a significant loss of the preservative due to adsorption was observed (see
Surprisingly, it was found that the decrease of sodium benzoate content over a time period of 18 months or at least 18 months is significantly lower in PP bottles than in bottles made of either HDPE or LDPE (see
The meloxicam assay is very stable over time and it is demonstrated that the type of packaging material has no impact on meloxicam, see
The bottle may be opaque or transparent, preferably opaque.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2795529 | Alburn et al. | Jun 1957 | A |
3288675 | Newmark et al. | Nov 1966 | A |
3849549 | Dempski et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3931212 | Satzinger et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
3947576 | Kuczkowski et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
4233299 | Trummlitz et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4482554 | Gebhardt et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4543200 | Sherman | Sep 1985 | A |
4628053 | Fries | Dec 1986 | A |
4748174 | Veronesi | May 1988 | A |
4794117 | Corbiere | Dec 1988 | A |
4802926 | Kussendrager et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4835187 | Reuter et al. | May 1989 | A |
4942167 | Chiesi et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5169847 | Nagy nee Kricsfalussy et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5283065 | Doyon et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5304561 | Sarfarazi | Apr 1994 | A |
5360611 | Robertson et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5380934 | Inoue et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5414011 | Fu et al. | May 1995 | A |
5654003 | Fuisz et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5700816 | Isakson et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5811446 | Thomas | Sep 1998 | A |
5824658 | Falk et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5886030 | Maniar | Mar 1999 | A |
5962012 | Lin et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6046191 | Hamley et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6071539 | Robinson et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6090800 | Unger et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6106862 | Chen et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6136804 | Nichtberger | Oct 2000 | A |
6156349 | Steinbach et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6166012 | Muller et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6180136 | Larson et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183779 | Ouali et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6184220 | Turck et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6187800 | Suri et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6221377 | Meyer | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6284269 | Struengmann et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6319519 | Woolfe et al. | Nov 2001 | B2 |
6495603 | Miyake et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6550955 | D'Silva | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6599529 | Skinhøj et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6605295 | Bellmann et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6630056 | Thibierge et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6669957 | Laruelle et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6682747 | Turck et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6869948 | Bock et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6986346 | Hochrainer et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7105512 | Morizono et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7969206 | Ito | Jun 2011 | B2 |
20020006440 | Cherukuri | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020016342 | Scolnick et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020035107 | Henke et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020058908 | Zierenberg et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020068088 | Gruber | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077328 | Hassan et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020099049 | Burch et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020106345 | Uhrich et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020187187 | Ohki et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030050305 | Tejada | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055051 | Morizono et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030109701 | Coppi et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030119825 | Folger et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030199482 | Seibert et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030220306 | Simmons et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040001883 | Matsui et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015126 | Zierenberg et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024041 | Selzer | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040024042 | Breyer | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040037869 | Cleverly et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040043992 | Tolba et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040110747 | Altman | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040171611 | Trummlitz et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040180092 | Henke et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040198826 | Baiker et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040204413 | Faour et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040204472 | Briggs et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040214753 | Britten et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040229038 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040234596 | Ohki et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040253312 | Sowden et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050038018 | Kanbe et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050147664 | Liversidge et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050187212 | Ohki et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050187213 | Lang et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050197332 | Altman | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050244491 | Ohki et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050245510 | Friton et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050277634 | Janott et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288280 | Friton et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060079516 | Henke et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060160793 | Altman | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060217431 | Daemmgen et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070077296 | Folger et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070099907 | Altman | May 2007 | A1 |
20070193894 | Macken et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070249727 | Martin et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080132493 | Folger et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080234380 | Shapiro | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080280840 | Lang et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20100233399 | Pradella et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110083985 | Folger et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110275618 | Folger et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120077764 | Freehauf et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130178467 | Henke et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140066440 | Folger et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140113893 | Folger et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
673675 | Nov 1996 | AU |
1102802 | Jun 1981 | CA |
2164100 | Jan 1995 | CA |
2166204 | Jan 1995 | CA |
2326517 | Oct 1999 | CA |
2404360 | Sep 2001 | CA |
2414063 | Dec 2001 | CA |
2469588 | Jun 2003 | CA |
2503396 | May 2004 | CA |
3434707 | Apr 1985 | DE |
3700172 | Jul 1987 | DE |
4217971 | Oct 1993 | DE |
19729879 | Jan 1999 | DE |
10010123 | Sep 2001 | DE |
10024752 | Nov 2001 | DE |
10032132 | Jan 2002 | DE |
10300323 | Oct 2004 | DE |
0002482 | Jun 1979 | EP |
0034432 | Aug 1981 | EP |
0093999 | Nov 1983 | EP |
0177870 | Apr 1986 | EP |
0179430 | Apr 1986 | EP |
0306984 | Mar 1989 | EP |
0360246 | Mar 1990 | EP |
0390071 | Oct 1990 | EP |
0422681 | Apr 1991 | EP |
0465235 | Jan 1992 | EP |
0560329 | Sep 1993 | EP |
0629392 | Dec 1994 | EP |
0945134 | Sep 1999 | EP |
1082966 | Mar 2001 | EP |
1190714 | Mar 2002 | EP |
1568369 | Aug 2005 | EP |
2065846 | Feb 1995 | ES |
2159564 | Oct 2001 | ES |
2437838 | Apr 1980 | FR |
2455875 | Jun 2009 | GB |
1251650 | May 1995 | IT |
47007352 | Mar 1972 | JP |
1299230 | Dec 1989 | JP |
11139971 | May 1999 | JP |
2001170083 | Jun 2001 | JP |
03535902 | Dec 2003 | JP |
3550782 | Aug 2004 | JP |
4018022 | Dec 2007 | JP |
04321624 | Aug 2009 | JP |
9301814 | Feb 1993 | WO |
9400420 | Jan 1994 | WO |
9509639 | Apr 1995 | WO |
9517178 | Jun 1995 | WO |
9518604 | Jul 1995 | WO |
9603387 | Feb 1996 | WO |
9603388 | Feb 1996 | WO |
9610999 | Apr 1996 | WO |
9611192 | Apr 1996 | WO |
9641625 | Dec 1996 | WO |
9703655 | Feb 1997 | WO |
9703667 | Feb 1997 | WO |
9717978 | May 1997 | WO |
9717989 | May 1997 | WO |
9729776 | Aug 1997 | WO |
9731631 | Sep 1997 | WO |
9817250 | Apr 1998 | WO |
9909988 | Mar 1999 | WO |
9912524 | Mar 1999 | WO |
9927906 | Jun 1999 | WO |
9949845 | Oct 1999 | WO |
9949867 | Oct 1999 | WO |
9959634 | Nov 1999 | WO |
0015195 | Mar 2000 | WO |
0108689 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0137838 | May 2001 | WO |
0152897 | Jul 2001 | WO |
0164268 | Sep 2001 | WO |
0187343 | Nov 2001 | WO |
0197813 | Dec 2001 | WO |
0285331 | Oct 2002 | WO |
0349733 | Jun 2003 | WO |
03049733 | Jun 2003 | WO |
03082297 | Oct 2003 | WO |
03097066 | Nov 2003 | WO |
2004004776 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2004026116 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2004026313 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2004037264 | May 2004 | WO |
2004089379 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2004103283 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2005002542 | Jan 2005 | WO |
2005004915 | Jan 2005 | WO |
2005079806 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2005097040 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2005105101 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2005115386 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2006000306 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2006100213 | Sep 2006 | WO |
2007013550 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2007039417 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2007087214 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2008152122 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2009049304 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2011046853 | Apr 2011 | WO |
2011107498 | Sep 2011 | WO |
2011138197 | Nov 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
METACAM Professional Insert, Boehringer Ingelheim, Jan. 2005. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2010/052128 mailed on Jan. 27, 2011. |
Abstract in English of JP2001170083, 2001. |
Abstract in English of JP4018022, 2007. |
Abstract in English of JP3550782, 2004. |
Abstract in English of WO199301814, 1993. |
Chemical Abstracts, vol. 118, No. 18, Abstract No. 175803, XP002087682, 1993, 1 page. |
Abstract in English of ES2065846, 1995. |
Gerritsen et al., “Prostaglandin Synthesis and Release from Cultured Human Trabecular-meshwork Cells and Scleral Fibroblasts”. Experimental Eye Research, vol. 43, No. 6, 1986, pp. 1089-1102. |
Herbort et al., “Anti-inflammatory Effect of Topical Diclofenac After Argon Laser Trabeculoplasty: Preliminary Results of a Placebo Controlled Study”. Klin. Monatsbl. Augenheik, vol. 200, No. 5, May 1992, pp. 358-361. |
Pharma Projects, Dialog File 928, Accession Nr. 0021312, Diclofenac, InSite Vision, 1996, 5 pages. |
Snyder et al., “Corticosteroid Treatment and Trabecular Meshwork Proteases in Cell and Organ Culture Supernatants”. Experimental Eye Research, vol. 57, No. 4, 1993, pp. 461-468. |
Masferrer et al., “Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors: A New Approach to the Therapy of Ocular Inflammation”. Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 41, Supp. 2, Feb. 1997, pp. S35-S40. |
Abstract in English for IT1251650, 1995. |
Li et al., “Degradation mechanism and kinetic studies of a novel anticancer agent, AG2034”. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 167, 1998, pp. 49-56. |
Bunji, Kouho, “Tissue Damage Due to Infections”. Drug Injection Handbook, Fundamentals of Blending Variation for Injection Drugs, Nanzando Co. Ltd., Tokyo, 1976, p. 5. |
Pharmaceutical Excipent Encyclopedia, Yakuji Nippo Ltd., Tokyo, 1994, pp. 2-5. |
Rudnic et al., “Oral Solid Dosage Forms”.,Gennaro, Editior, Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, 18th Edition, Mack Publishing Company, Easton, PA, 1990, pp. 1633-1645 and pp. 1654-1655. |
Saha et al., “Effect of solubilizing excipients on permeation of poorly water-soluble compounds across Caco-2 cell monolayers”. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, vol. 50, No. 3, 2000, pp. 403-411, Abstract accessed at http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=798854, accessed on Aug. 13, 2010, 3 pages. |
Schneeweis et al., “In Vivo and In Vitro Diclofenac Sodium Evaluation After Rectal Application of Soft Gelatine. Capsules Enabling Application Induced Transformation (AIT) into a Seminsolid System of Liquid Crystals (SSLC) for Controlled Release”. Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 14, No. 12, Dec. 1997, pp. 1726-1729. |
Sciencelab.com, “Lactose, Monohydrate, Spray-Dried Powder, NF”. Accessed at http://www.epoxy-paint.net/page/.S/PVAR/10419/SLL1453, Feb. 29, 2008, 2 pages. |
Sorbera et al., “Lumiracoxib Antiarthritic, COX-2 Inhibitor”. Drugs of the Future, vol. 27, No. 8, Aug. 2002, pp. 740-747. |
Stei et al., “Local Tissue Tolerability of Meloxicam, a New NSAID: Indications for Parental, Dermal and Mucosal Administration”. British Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 35, Supp. 1, 1996, pp. 44-50. |
Straus et al., “New Evidence for Stroke Prevention: Clinical Applications”. The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 288, No. 11, Sep. 2002, pp. 1396-1398. |
Straus et al., “New Evidence for Stroke Prevention: Scientific Review”. The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 288, No. 11, Sep. 2002, pp. 1388-1395. |
Sunose et al., “The Effect of Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitor, FK3311, on Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Canine Lung Transplantation”. Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, vol. 19, No. 1, Jan. 2000, p. 40. |
Tuerck et al., “Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Meloxicam”. Arzneimittel-Forschung, vol. 47, No. 3, 1997, pp. 253-258. |
Tunuguntla et al., “Management of Prostatitis”. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, vol. 5, No. 3, 2002, pp. 172-179. |
Vippagunta et al., “Crystalline solids”. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 48, 2001, pp. 3-26. |
Nell et al., “Comparison of vedaprofen and meloxicam in dogs with muskuloskeletal pain and inflammation”. Journal of Small Animal Practice, vol. 43, No. 5, May 2002, pp. 208-212 [Accessed at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12038853 on Sep. 27, 2013]. Abstract Only, 1 page. |
“Metacam(R)” FDA Animal & Veterinary Drug Labels, WEB site: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AnimalVeterinary/Products/ApprovedAnimalDrugProducts/DrugLabels/UCM050397.pdf> Accessed Jun. 8, 2010. |
“Committee for Veterinary Medicinal Products-Meloxicam (Extension to PIGS)—Summary Report (5)”. The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products, Veterinary Medicines and Information Technology, Dec. 2000, pp. 1-3. |
“Metacam (R) 0.5 mg/ml oral suspension for cats.” Boehringer Ingelheim Datasheet, WEB site: http://www.vetgb.com/vetgb—pdfs/metacamc—7a5c—vetgb.pdf> Accessed on Jun. 8, 2010. |
“Metacam(R)” FDA Animal & Veterinary Drug Labels, WEB site: http:/www.fda.gov/downloads/AnimalVeterinary/Products/ApprovedAnimalDrugProducts/DrugLabels/UCM050397.pdf> Accessed Jun. 8, 2010. |
“Types of Solutions”. University of Wisconsin, Stevens Point, Feb. 1, 2001, accessed at http://www.uwsp.edu/chemistry/tzamis/chem106pdfs/solutionexamples.pdf, Google date sheet included, 2 pages. |
Abstract in English of DE10024752, 2001. |
Abstract in English of FR2437838, 1980. |
Abstract in English of JP47007352, 1972. |
Abstract in English of DE3434707, 1985. |
Abstract in English of JP02906528, 1999. |
Abstract in English of JP11139971, 1999. |
Altman et al., “Efficacy Assessment of Meloxicam, a Preferential Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitor, in Acute Coronary Syndromes Without ST-Segment Elevation: The Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in Unstable Angina Treatment-2 (NUT-2) Pilot Study”. Circulation, vol. 106, 2002, pp. 191-195. |
Ansel et al., “Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Drug Delivery Systems”. Seventh Edition, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 1999, pp. 77-87. |
Bednarek et al., “Effect of steroidal and non-steroidal anti-imflammatory drugs in combination with long-acting oxytetracycline on non-specific immunity of calves suffering from enzootic bronchopneumonia”. Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 96, 2003, pp. 53-67. |
Bednarek et al., “The effect of steroidal and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on the cellular immunity of calves with experimentally-induced local lung inflammation”. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, vol. 71, 1999, pp. 1-15. |
Boehringer Ingelheim; Metacam (Meloxicam) Now Approved for Pigs and Mastitis in Dairy Cows; May 2003 Press Release; pp. 1-2. |
Cho et al., “In vitro effects of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae on inducible nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase-2 in porcine alveolar macrophages”. American Journal of Veterinary Research, vol. 64, No. 12, Dec. 2003, pp. 1514-1518. |
D'Yakov et al., “Long term use of Tamsulosin (omnic®) in Patients with Chronic Prostatitis”. Urologiia, vol. 5, 2002, pp. 10-12. |
Del Tacca et al., “Efficacy and Tolerability of Meloxicam, a COX-2 Preferential Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug”. Clinical Drug Investigation, vol. 22, No. 12, 2002, pp. 799-818. |
Dellabella et al., “Conservative Managment of Juxtavesical Calculi with Tamsulosin”. European Urology Supplements, vol. 2, No. 1, 2003, p. 81. |
Dow Chemicals Brochure, entitled “Using METHOCEL cellulose ethers for controlled release of drugs in hyrophilic matrix systems.” Publication Jul. 2000, Form No. 198-02075-700 AMS, pp. 1-36. |
Dunn et al., “Tamsulosin: A Review of its Pharmacology and Therapeutic Efficacy in the Management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms”. Drugs & Aging, vol. 19, No. 2, 2002, pp. 132-161. |
Engelhardt et al., “Meloxicam: Influence on Arachidonic Acid Metabolism”. Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 51, 1996, pp. 21-28. |
Ettmayer et al., “Lessons Learned from Marketed and Investigational Prodrugs”. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 47, No. 10, May 2004, pp. 2393-2404. |
European Search Report for EP10155400 dated Jun. 9, 2010. |
European Search Report for EP10162015 dated Aug. 30, 2010. |
Farkouh et al., “Comparison of lumiracoxib with naproxen and ibuprofen in the Therapeutic Arthritis Research and Gastrointestinal Event Trial (TARGET), cardiovascular outcomes: randomised controlled trial”. Lancet, vol. 364, Aug. 2004, pp. 675-684. |
Fitzgerald et al., “COX-2 inhibitors and the cardiovascular system”. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, vol. 19, No. 6, Supp. 25, Nov. 2001, pp. S31-S36. |
Fitzpatrick et al., “Recognising and Controlling Pain and Inflammation in Mastitis”. Proceedings of the British Mastitis Conference, Axient/Institute for Animal Health, Milk Development Council/Novartis Animal Health, 1998, pp. 36-44. |
Giuliani et al., “Role of Antithrombotic Therapy in Cardiac Disease”. Mayo Clinic Practice of Cardiology, Third Edition, Mosby, St. Louis, MO, 1996, pp. 1116-1121. |
Gollackner et al., “Increased apoptosis of hepatocyctes in vascular occulusion after orthotopic liver transplantation”. Transplant International, vol. 13, No. 1, 2000, pp. 49-53. |
Gruet et al., “Bovine mastitis and intramammary drug delivery: review and perspectives”. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 50, 2001, pp. 245-259. |
Guth et al., “Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of terbogrel, a combined thromboxane A2 receptor and synthase inhibitor, in healthy subjects”. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 58, No. 1, Jul. 2004, pp. 40-51. |
Hawkey et al., “Gastrointestinal Tolerability of Meloxicam Compared to Diclofenac in Osteoarthritis Patients”. British Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 37, No. 9, 1998, pp. 937-945. |
Hirsch et al, “Investigation on the efficacy of meloxicam in sows with mastitis-metritis-agalactia syndrome”. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 26, 2003, pp. 355-360. |
Hydrated Silica Webpage; http://science.kosmix.com/topic/hydrated—silica; Kosmix Corporation, Apr. 21, 2011, pp. 1-14. |
Jain et al., “Antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation”. Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy, vol. 15, No. 5, Sep. 2001, pp. 423-436. [Abstract Only]. |
Kimura et al., “Effect of cilostazol on platelet agrregation and experimental thrombosis”. Arzneimittel-Forschung, vol. 35, No. 7A, 1985, pp. 1144-1149. [Abstract Only]. |
Kumar et al., “Comparative Studies on Effect of Some Hydrophilic Polymers on the Dissolution Rate of a Poorly Water Soluble Drug, Meloxicam”. Indian Drugs, vol. 39, No. 6, Apr. 2002, pp. 323-329. |
Lieberman et al., “Tablet Formulation and Design” in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms: Tablets, vol. 1, Second Edition, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, New York, 1989, pp. 105-108. |
Luger et al., “Structure and physicochemical properties of meloxicam, a new NSAID”. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 5, 1996, pp. 175-187. |
Macdonald Campus of McGill University, “Mastitis in Dairy Cows”, published online, Jul. 2003, pp. 1-12. |
McDonald et al., “Calpain inhibitor I reduces the activation of nuclear factor-KappaB and Organ Injury/Dysfunction in Hemorrhagic Shock”. The FASEB Journal, vol. 15, Jan. 2001, pp. 171-186. |
Noble et al., “Meloxicam”. Drugs, vol. 51, No. 3, Mar. 1996, pp. 424-430. |
Parikh et al., Binders and Solvents, Chapter 4, Handbook of Pharmaceutical Granulation Technology, First Edition, Marcel Dekker,1997, pp. 59-67. |
Physicians' Desk Reference, 55th Edition, Medical Economics Company, Inc., 2001, pp. 981-984 and pp. 1404-1406. |
Rantanen et al., “Process Analysis of Fluidized Bed Granulation”. AAPS PharmsciTech, vol. 2, No. 4, Article 21, 2001, 8 pages. |
Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy, 19th Edition, vol. II, Mack Publishing Company, Easton, Pennsylvania, 1995, p. 1646. |
Robson et al., “Intrinsic acute renal failure (ARF) associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAId) use in juvenile cats undergoing routine desexing-16 cases 1998-2005”. May 2006, Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, vol. 20, No. 3, Abst. 109, p. 740. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110083985 A1 | Apr 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61250709 | Oct 2009 | US |